NI7358 Acceleration time too long

Hi all,
First, let me introduces briefly our application for your better understanding before touch the problem.
We're using NI7358 to control 8 servo motors(Mitsubishi HC-KFS13, 100W, 3000RPM, 131072Counts/Rev) for pick and place. The amplifier is also Mitsubishi one MELSERVO-J2M-P8A. From view of NI7358 all 8 axes are open-loop stepper while amplifier will close-loop control the servo motors. One limitation here is this amplifier only can accept 200KPPS pulse rate input, so we set amplifier internal gear ratio to 4096/125 to achieve its maximum speed.
GearRatio=(3000rpm*131072count/60)/(200*1000counts/sec)
Then based on this ratio we can know the resolution of "stepper" in view of NI7358 is 4000RPM. (131072*125/4096)
Now our problem is:
The system requires these motors move in short distance(1200steps for NI7358) in the shortest time. So we want to shorten the acceleration/deceleration time as possible as we can. As we test the same application before using Keyence PLC as pulse generator, it can meet our target so we expect NI also can.
During testing using MAX under 1-D interactive, when I set Velocity=3000rpm, Accel/Decel=20000rps/s, target=1200steps, I can get the best result around 1040rpm(peak velocity) with Accel/Decel time around 50ms. The time is too long for us. If I set increase Accel/Deceleration to its maximum* NI7358 will stop pulse output at all(don't know why but suspect it's because of short distance)
* Maximum Accel/Deceleration(RPS/s) = Amax X (1/Ts) X (1/Ts) X (1/R) (refer to the description of "flex_load_rpsps")
   for our case: Amax=32counts/sample; Ts=0.25ms; R=4000steps/Rev, result is 128000(RPS/s)
Questions:
1. Is Amax=32counts/sample hardware fixed?
2. Any reason can cause NI7358 stop output pulse when I set maximum acceleration/decelration?
3. Does NI provide time-based profile instead of velocity one so we can set acceleration/deceleration time directly?
4. Can I use direct pulse output mode just like a pulse generator instead of current profile output?
5. Under open-loop mode, if I change PID & acceleration feedforward gain, do these will affect the output pulse performance?
6. If we change the control circuit from open-loop stepper to close-loop servo system, does it can solve our problem?
7. How does the trajectory generator produces the count/steps output during the acceleration? I create an excel file(attached below) try to draw out the relationship between the sample, velocity and acceleration, anyone can check for me it's correct or not?
My formula is here:
Position2 = Position1 + Velocity2*(Sample2-Sample1)
Velocity2  = Velocity1 + Acceleration*(Sample2-Sample1)
All comments are appreciated!
Attachments:
Profile Study.xls ‏28 KB

BO has no controls over VPN or network bamdwith, it takes what OS and DB drivers give it.
You'll need to identify at which point of the workflow to refresh the report the slowness is occuring.
You'll need to enable webi tracing and see how long the actual refresh take.
You'll need to enable network traces to see where in the network the slowdown is occuring.

Similar Messages

  • Average processing time too long in workload monitoring (ST03N)

    Hi expert,
    I wander why average processing time too long in workload monitoring (ST03N)
    for example
    avg.response time : 4700 (ms)
    avg.processing time : 4200 (ms)
    avg.CPU time : 300 (ms)
    avg.DB time : 200(ms)
    OS (CPU and memory ) status is nomal.
    please tell me why processing time too long and what do I check more.
    thanks

    Hi
    Processing Time is the total time taken i.e. Time when user clicks on submit button to send data to SAP System till the time SAP System processes everything and shows the updated screen back to the user. It includes Network Time also.
    Average Processing Time is the Processing Time per Dialog Step
    In ST03N workload Monitor, there are different Task Type like Dialog, Background, RFC, Update,..........
    Could you be more specific where do you find the Average Processing Time high ? I mean for which Task Type.
    If you have users complaining for Performance problem check their Network Time also.
    Let us know, if this information was helpful to you.
    with regards,
    Parin Hariyani

  • Elapsed Timer Too Long?

    Is there a limit to the duration I can input into an elapsed timer VI? In my program the user can specify a duration of up to 24 hrs. My program is supposed to hold current conditions for the specified durations. When the user sets it 1, 2, 3 or four hours it holds the current conditions fine. When they set it to 24 hours the current conditions are not held for 24 hours. Is this too long of a duration for this VI (86,400 seconds)?
    thanks.

    rchaoua wrote:
    The question regarding maximum duration a elapsed time VI has still not been answered.
    You can convert the "elapsed time" express VI to a plain VI by "right-click...open front panel" and inspect the code yourself. There are no secrets! You can see that it converts the timestamp to DBL and operates on the lower precision DBL values. This should be sufficient for much more than 24 hours, so something else is wrong in your case.
    Can you attach an example that shows the incorrect behavior (=premature elapsation?).
    rchaoua wrote:
    But I have another question; Can you have multiple elapsed time VI in a single piece of code and not have it affect the other elapsed VIs?  I have three elapsed timers in my code (in different panels) and get the sneaking supsicion that they are not behaving nicely with each other. But I am not sure. I was hoping someone has expereince with this scenario and could shed some light.
    The crucial subVIs are reentrant and thus there should be no interaction between multiple instances of the "elapsed time" express VI. Each will keep it's own state. Why do you suspect that they interact?
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

  • Profile WS run time too long

    My first test run (in dev) of the custom Java PWS against a SQL server database seems to be taking too long. Its seems to be taking appx. 1 second or more per user. This will be a problem when processing around 20,000 users. We can't have a PWS running for 4-6 hours everynight.
    I'd really appreciate any tips to optimize this for faster performance. I am opening DB Connection and running 2 queries for each users and clsoing the statement and connection. Can I do this another way so I open the DB connection(and maybe statement) for the Profile Source only once and release the connection etc. after the whole job is done or in case of errors.
    Please help as this could be a huge bottleneck for us!
    Thanks.
    Vanita
    Staples

    Hi Akash,
    Thanks for your quick reply. Unfortunately I don't have any signature field to limit the profile sync by. I am currently running the PWs in ToMCAT 4.1.30. We plan to deploy on WAS in dev. I am not sure if there is connection pooling being done by Tomcat in 4.1.30 version. Do you have any information on that? I am doing db connect and 2 property queries in the getuserproperties method.
    1. Would the connection pooling (if done in WAS) make any difference to the run time?
    2. Would opening the connection in initialize() method versus GetUserProperties() make any difference?
    As always, thanks for your help.
    Vanita
    ------- Akash Jain wrote on 3/1/05 1:25 PM -------Hi Vanita,On recent hardware, you should be able to perform an initial profile sync at at a rate of ~10/second. This means you should be able to perform your 20k users profile sync in under an hour. Resyncs should be much faster if you use a signature attribute.
    I'm going to assume you're hitting some database backend with a table structure like the following:Users Table String UserGUID Date LastModified
    Properties Table int PropID String UserGUID String PropValue
    You have your users keyed off a unique name - a GUID in this example - and properties in a seperate table keyed off PropID and GUID.
    Lets review the protocol and each step:a) initialize() - sends the parameters of the profile sync to the PWS, this is a good place to do a single query to your database in order to cache all user unique names and signatures (LastModified dates) in a HashTable. This will make re-syncs much faster since subsequent AttachToUser() and GetUserSignature() calls will be derived from this HashTable.b) attachToUser() - in this call you can simply lookup your user record against the HashTable created in Initialize(). If no entry is returned, then throw a NoSuchUserException. If a user does exist continue.c) getUserSignature() - again use the HashTable created in Initialize() to lookup the signature for this user. return it as a String.d) getUserProperties() - if called, this means the signature you sent back in step (c) has changed since the last profile sync. you now want to make a call to your properties table (a single DB call) to load all the property values for the user. return these as a UserPropertyInfo object.
    During an initital sync, you will always get to step (d) above. During re-syncs, assuming there is low churn, I'd say a max of 1% of your calls will get to step (d) and thus the re-sync should be an order of magnitude faster in most cases.
    With respect to database connections - if you are opening and closing a connection for each user, this is pretty poor with respect to performance. Your best bet in Java is to use a single connection (this is a single threaded process) which is setup in initialize(). In the shutdown() method, close this connection.
    I hope this helps, the combination of using a single connection, using the signature attribute and caching all the users unique names and signatures in one call at the start of the profile sync should drastically increase performance.
    Thanks,Akash

  • Download time too long

    Why is it taking too long to download a song?  Im talking HOURS if it even happens!

    Could you download the graphics dynamically as they are required?
    So, the air app would be the master 'app' and those additional 
    graphics are loaded from your server only when required? I'd bet this 
    would be the way you'd build it if the app were purely based online 
    and not via air?
    Dave Cates
    Managing Director
    Redemption Media Ltd
    www.redemptionmedia.co.uk
    Interactive internet, media & communications solutions.
    Sent from my iPhone

  • Macbook boot time too long

    Hello, boot time on my MacBook seems to be very long. Can you please take a look at my bootchart and tell me what do you think?
    And also the gnome login is very slow. More precisely, it takes too much time for the desktop to appear after logging in.
    Here is the bootchart:
    http://i49.tinypic.com/5yrk11.png
    Last edited by exapplegeek (2012-07-08 22:00:21)

    exapplegeek, your thread title is far too general. Please rephrase it such like: "Macbook boot time problem" as soon as possible.
    And leave the "[BOOTCHART]" part out.

  • Email loading times too long (Gmail, E75)

    Hi dudes, and thanks for reading.
    Email provider: Gmail
    Phone: E75
    Phone firmware: 202.12.01 (the newest)
    I'm getting pretty long waiting times when my phone loads my emails.
    I have set up an account to the phone's email application. It lists the emails in real time, but when I try to open an one, the loading time gets overwhelming.
    It is not a pleasure to use the email application.
    Can I do anything for this? Another app?
    Any help wuold be appreciated!!!

    Multiple reasons too hard to guess.
    First step of ts - reset network settings

  • Adobe webdynpro taking time too long

    Hi,
    Initially, I have Read Timed Out issue. I;ve incresed the Web Container timeout to 360 seconds. but now, when I run the program with Interavtive form, it tooks very long time. It's been 30 minutes and still going. I do see the log mentioned not found ServiceContext, Any idea what's wrong?
    [code]org.omg.CORBA.BAD_PARAM: Not found ServiceContext with id=0  vmcid: OMG  minor code: 26 completed: Maybe
         at com.sap.engine.services.iiop.internal.giop.ClientRequest.get_reply_service_context(ClientRequest.java:284)
         at com.sap.engine.services.ts.jts.ots.PortableInterceptor.ClientJTSInterceptor.receive_reply(ClientJTSInterceptor.java:91)
         at com.sap.engine.services.iiop.internal.giop.ClientRequest.dealReceiveReply(ClientRequest.java:133)
         at com.sap.engine.services.iiop.internal.giop.ClientRequest.dealReceiveReply(ClientRequest.java:125)
         at com.sap.engine.services.iiop.server.portable.Delegate.invoke(Delegate.java:282)
         at org.omg.CORBA.portable.ObjectImpl._invoke(ObjectImpl.java:457)
         at com.adobe.service._FontManagerStub.getAdobeServerFontDirectory(_FontManagerStub.java:33)
         at com.adobe.document.XMLFormService.getFontDirectories(Unknown Source)
         at com.adobe.document.XMLFormService.getCommonDir(Unknown Source)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:324)
         at com.adobe.service.ProcessResource$ManagerImpl.getConfigPropertyString(ProcessResource.java:1080)
         at com.adobe.service.Manager_Tie.getConfigPropertyString(Manager_Tie.java:55)
         at com.adobe.service._ManagerImplBase._invoke(_ManagerImplBase.java:101)
         at com.sap.engine.services.iiop.internal.InvokeHandlerHolder.invoke(InvokeHandlerHolder.java:35)
         at com.sap.engine.services.iiop.internal.giop.IncomingRequest.process(IncomingRequest.java:244)
         at com.sap.engine.services.iiop.internal.giop.ConnectionParser.readMessage(ConnectionParser.java:85)
         at com.sap.engine.services.iiop.server.CommunicationLayerImpl.request(CommunicationLayerImpl.java:209)
         at com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process(ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:33)
         at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41)
         at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
         at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
         at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:100)
         at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:170)[/code]

    OK. I found the problem. In one of the java parameters in the installation guide, It mentioned to add:
    -Dorg.omg.PortableInterceptor.ORBInitializerClass<b>.</b>com.sap.engine.services.ts.jts.ots.PortableInterceptor.JTSInitializer
    Well, looking at the rest of the parameter for -Dorg..Class, it always followed by <b>'='</b>, so I change into:
    -Dorg.omg.PortableInterceptor.ORBInitializerClass<b>=</b>com.sap.engine.services.ts.jts.ots.PortableInterceptor.JTSInitializer
    And now it is working just fine.

  • Windows 8.1 first boot time too long

    After Sysprep, windows 8.1 tooks long time to boot, is it normal?
    N.A.Malik

    Hi,
    Generally, when you sysprep an image and deploy it to other devices, it would prepare the device settings, registry update and other computer configuration. This phase would take some time. We call it as specialize and OOBE pass.
    Here we have a metric to assess the first boot time, you can take a look at this guide:
    First Boot Performance
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/jj130825.aspx
    Alex Zhao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Are Skype support response times too long for you?

    Just answer yes or no....
    ....and then tell me how long you waited.
    i.e. Yes 7 hours 
    I'm really interested in finding out how much I can rely on this forum for a quick response to problems as I use Skype to communicate with my customers, suppliers and colleagues worldwide.
    The response time to critical questions like "because of a 'technical problem at Skype" I can't allocate credit to my coworkers so as they can call up their contacts phones" - (a.k.a I want to give Skype some money) is unreasonably long. I'm trying to guage how long I can expect to wait.
    Sonic

    Hello  sonic,
    I see you are asking about response time on the forum for questions to be answered. 
    Well, it just depends on who is online at the time you post your question.  We have many professional users like TheUberOverlord and Primemover that are here all the time and answer qualified questions all day.  The Skype Enterprise Team are here 24/7 but are sometimes answering Chats from customers in the Live Chat Sessions of Skype Manager.
    If you want an immediate response, you need to log into your Skype Manager and click on the Chat Button in the top right of that screen and you will be connected to us immediately.  We are here 24/7 for your support.  It is a Business Class Service and we talk to customers from all over the world day and night. We are here to get customers PBX's and SIP compatable devices connected to Skype Connect and can answer most any question on products and devices.
    Thank You for using Skype and the Skype Community Forums.
    Regards,
    Victor S.
    Skype Enterprise Support

  • Urgent problem! please help. high speed digitizer, channel switch time too long!

    Dear all NI high speed digitizer experts:
     I post a question concerning the two-channel configuration using NI5154 digitizer (see Need help to configure a two-channel acquisition using NI5154 ).
     As we need to do some measurement using NI5154 very soon so purchase a DAQ board as suggested by Efrain is not a option for our coming experiment. So I try to configure the NI5154 a two channel acquisition. I configure the NI5154 to count pulse in two channels. Our experimental setup will send pulse to channel 0 for 400 ms and then stop. 100 ms later pulses from other source will be send to channel 1 for 2 s.  I thought the 100ms dead time in our setup would be long enough for the digitizer to switch from channel 0 to channel 1. But after some test I found the digitizer takes more time to switch between channels. 
    I made a test vi (NISCOPE-Timing.vi) just for count how many ms it takes for the digitizer to switch between channels. In the attached vi, if you run for only one channel one loop takes about 20 ms in my pc. If you run for two channels it takes about 130 ms for one loop. If you just run one channel twice the loop time is about 40 ms (I mean stop a channel and then restart the that channel).
    I don't understand why it takes so long to switch from channel 0 to channel 1.  As I tested the niScope Commit.vi consumes a lot of time for the second channel. Is there any way to avoid this? We can not extend the 100ms long dead time of out set up so I must get rid of this problem. 
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.
    Attachments:
    NiSCOPE-Timing.vi ‏34 KB

    Hi Lixin,
    There are a couple of different options that you may try. The first, which it sounds like you may not prefer, is to use the TRIG line on the 5154 and somehow find a way to route both sets of pulses to that line. You can either somehow connect both lines to the one input or use some sort of external switch since the signals will not come in at the same time.
    Unfortunately, what you re seeing in terms of the time it takes the board to reconfigure itself for a different trigger channel and re-inititiate is due to the settling time that is necessary for the board to be able to fully reach its specifications. The majority of settling usually occurs pretty quickly, but the board will wait for some time to get the best possible performance in terms of specs. If you are okay with reducing this settling time (and very slightly diminish the specified performance), then you can use an internal scope property to set the max settling time.
    I have attached a .rc file which must be placed in the LabVIEW directory for niScope to enable use of this property node. Please place the file in your ...\Program Files\National Instruments\<LabVIEW 2009>\instr.lib\niScope directory. Once the file is in that directory, restart LabVIEW, and you should be able to see a new category in the niScope Property Node tree titled "Internal". Under that category, you will have the Max Settling Time property, which gives the driver a maximum amount of time (in seconds) to wait for settling before beginning a new acquisition. Add this new property to your first property node at the beginning of your program. I tested this out with a value of 50 ms and found that my initiate went from ~125 ms to ~53 ms or so after reconfiguring the trigger channel and re-initiating.
    Hope this helps!
    Daniel S.
    National Instruments
    Attachments:
    niScopeMaxSettling.zip ‏1 KB

  • Migration assistant from MacBook Pro to iMac time too long.

    Okay. I know this has been asked a number of times but I have yet to find a discussion with the time span my macs have given me. Quick story: Migration assistant from 2006-ish model MacBook Pro with snow leopard to brand new iMac (got it three days ago). The absolute only option I have been given is to transfer via wifi, regardless if thunderbolt/firewire or Ethernet is plugged in. Nothing else will come up so I am forced to do a wifi transfer. My time span is about 124 hours, which is nuts. Given, I am transferring about 500gb (I'm a recording musician). Is this normal or is there something hosing up my transfer? It is moving, but very slowly. Since last night it has moved almost a quarter of the way. Has anyone else had this long of a wait? And no, I don't have a large external hd.

    Hello flyinghostie,
    If you've not already, you'll need to launch Migration Assistant on both systems. The article linked below provides further information that you may find helpful.
    OS X: How to migrate data from another Mac using Mountain Lion and earlier
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4889
    Cheers,
    Allen

  • Sign-in time too long (Win 8.1)

    Two days ago I received quite a strong new Win 8.1 computer (with SATA drive).
    I have opted for a LOCAL user only without a password.
    The boot process was extremely fast: the computer turns-on to the blue log-in screen in few seconds; and then pressing Enter the signing-in process was almost immediate.
    Then, a bad thing happened: I was lured by Microsoft to sign-in with a Microsoft account.
    Then, signing-in to my computer with this MS account (and password) took ages; I mean, something like a full one minute the computer was trying to sign-in until eventually succeeding.
    Understanding my mistake (why would I want an MS account?) I decided to disconnect from my Microsoft account, and return back to my nice local user.
    But now, the long waiting time to signing-in (even without a password, and with an automatic log-in) still remains: I wait like 25 sec when the blue screen and the white dot circulate repeatedly until my account is signed-in.
    What is going on?
    Help me!

    Hi,
    Did you mean after switch to local user account, it still took long time to sign in?
    Firstly please disable unnecessary startup program:
    1. Open Task manager;
    2. Jump to Startup tab, right click to disable the unnecessary applications one by one.
    If the issue still persists, refresh your computer for test:
    How to refresh, reset, or restore your PC
    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-IN/windows-8/restore-refresh-reset-pc
    Karen Hu
    TechNet Community Support

  • IPhoto launch time too long

    I now have a reasonably large iPhoto library. 12409 photos, 29.8GB. It's all on the internal drive of my MacBook Pro laptop. Running iPhoto 6.0.6, OS X 10.5.5
    Launching iPhoto takes a long time. It takes a long time (about 1 minute) for the iPhoto window to appear and "loading photos" to be done. Once that is done, iPhoto sits with a spinning beachball cursor for about 5 minutes before I can do anything.
    Additionally, iPhoto seems to crash intermittently, proving to be slow and unreliable.
    The organisation into albums and slideshows, as well as keywords/captions is very useful. Plus I have to use it to import the photos because one cannot access a Canon camera as a memory device like virtually every other camera.
    Otherwise I would have deleted the 475MB application from the disk. Talk about a bloated application!
    Can anyone provide an insight into how to make the load time reasonable?
    Cheers,
    Matt

    LarryHN wrote:
    Probably a user bloated disk - iPhoto works very well IF you have adequate resources - your crashing and slowness both point to free disk space
    Thanks for that constructive comment. I have 10GB free disk space and 2GB ram. Activity viewer shows the CPU is mostly idle, and plenty of free memory. iPhoto seems to be hung using about 5-10% cpu time.
    I do have lots of stuff on my drive, but the machine is not struggling for CPU or memory, so I hardly think that is problem.
    If I "Sample Process" on iPhoto it seems that it is spinning the beach ball whilst using about 5-10% of cpu time, mostly under a CFArraySort function call. Seems to me that the program design doesn't work very well with a library of 12000+photos.
    Is iPhoto 7 significantly better in this regard? If so, I'll consider upgrading in the future, but if it has the same problems then I'll look for an alternative solution. The current working order of iPhoto 6 is unacceptable.
    Thanks, Matt.

  • Loop time too long...?!

    I'm making an application which sends (digital)signals with a NI
    USB6009 (usb I/O).
    Now I want to send a pulse train with pulse widths of 1 ms. (so 1 ms
    high, 1 ms low)
    My problem is that the time needed in the loop(s) to produce the signal
    takes more then this 1 ms (in fact about 5 - 12 ms). The signals are
    constantly produced and cannot be fixed. Right now this is fixed to 1
    ms just for the test/dev phase of the program. Lateron they will be
    made via a random generator (1-700 ms).
    I already tried to use timed loops (LV8) but that don't seems to solve
    it... I Also tried to clean up all "unneccesary" code, so no extra
    delay is created, but still the loops take too much time.
    So I need a sollution which is fast enough to produce a pulse train
    like I mentioned before. Anyone any experience and/or sollutions on
    this? (so without any NI RT sollutions...)
    thanks!

    I'm nor familiar with this I/O hardware, but can't you make an output pulse train controlled by hardware? i.e. well over 1kHz rate?
    I do faintly recall being able to input a "pattern" into a buffer for high-speed digital I/O (Array of Booleans or U8 I think) which can then be updated at the required speed (well over 1kHz).
    Check the advanced Digital I/O VIs for your hardware.  Please bear in mind that I haven't done any DAQ I/O for a while, and have no experience beyone LV 6.1.
    In other words, if it turns out I'm talking rubbish, I kinda told you so........
    Just checked the DIO VIs present in LV 6.1, and it seems quite possible.  See the attached pic of my help file.  It should be easy enough to gewt this to output a pulse train.....
    Hope this helps anyway
    Shane.
    PS You also need to use DIO COnfig and DIO Start to set the ports and the speed of the updates.....
    Message Edited by shoneill on 03-08-2006 03:24 PM
    Using LV 6.1 and 8.2.1 on W2k (SP4) and WXP (SP2)
    Attachments:
    Hardware DIO.png ‏29 KB

Maybe you are looking for

  • Assigning a form field to a variable in XSL in rtf template

    Hi, I have this code: <?xdoxslt:set_variable($_XDOCTX, 'x', 0)?> <?if:_-Basic._Total_Jobs_=''?>0<?end if?> <?xdoxslt:set_variable($_XDOCTX, 'x', -Basic_._Total_Jobs_ )?> <?xdoxslt:get_variable($_XDOCTX, 'x')?> This code is supposed to be initialising

  • Getting error while implementing the Export to Excel in VC

    Hi By refering the following link, i have implemented  Export To Excell functionality in VC. When i copied the following formula in the respective formula window, then it is giving the following error. can any body awareof what is the problem. copied

  • GUI_DOWNLOAD : Extra Line

    Hi All, I am downloading the the internal table into a flat file using GUI_DOWNLOAD. I am getting an extra line at the end which is not required. I have debugged and found the content is correct. However in note pad a blank line apprers. Any help wou

  • I cant use facetime on my ipad2

    my facetite is not working it says is not connected to internet

  • Bug in auto-increment for MSSQL

    I am using kodo 3.1.0 and have a scenario where I am persisting a new object that uses an auto-increment PK and the database has an on-insert trigger that inserts a log into an audit table. At the database level, what is happing is: 1) kodo calls "in