NIC directories not getting created under ISAPNP

AT-MIO-16X using NI-DAQ5.1 on Win98  (cross posted from the multifunction daq forum)
I am
setting up a spare board after one failed in system - the first board
reported failed when the Test Resources button was pressed.
A second board was tried in this system, with no success.
When
setting a second (similar PC specs) system up (it had been shelved),
the referenced directories are not being created during
the
installation of NI-DAQ and board. If I install and set the board up as
previously configured, matching the address/irq/dma channels,
the resource test reports "Not responding to the first IRQ". (No conflicts with resources reported.)
After
reading other postings (searched forums/knowledgebase, etc.), I tried
setting only the base address, and the resource test passes. 
Unfortunately,
when set up in this manner, the AIO and DIO seem to work but the
sinewave generator (test resources again) does not -
nor does waveform generation in our application.

Hello James,
In the future please refrain from posting the same question on multiple boards.
Go here for the active thread.
Regards,
Dan King

Similar Messages

  • Gateway registry not getting created

    Hi All
    We are installing Sun IDM gateway (Version: Sun Java System Identity Manager 7.0) on Windows Server 2003 R2 + Service Pack 2 based on the specified command line installation commands.
    But surprisingly its resgitry is not getting created under HKEY_LOCAK_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\. Due to this NDSExclusiveContext and other parameters cannot be set.
    Please advise

    I am having the same problem with this entry not being found in the registry. I've performed a search for 'Identity Manager' and found the gateway entry values here instead:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Sevices\IdentityManagerGateway
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Sevices\IdentityManagerGateway
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet002\Sevices\IdentityManagerGateway
    Please advise how to turn on the gateway loggin feature if this would make the specific entry to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE.... in the registry.
    Thanks.

  • Weblogic servers directory not getting created in the domain directory

    Hi
    I installed weblogic 12c(12.1.1.0) and then ran the config.sh to create the domain/managed servers directories.
    After the config.sh completely ran I am not seeing the servers directory under the domain directory. All other directories like config, bin are present under the domains directory.
    If anyone can let me know for weblogic-12c if they have come across such a issue during installation/configuration please reply to this thread.
    Thanks
    BharanB

    Hi,
    Weblogic servers directory do not gets created after domain creation or even managed server configuration. It will present itself only when you start the managed server for the first time, that is when it initializes all security attributes, diagnostic attributes (if configured) , etc..
    Perform server start and then check if it gets created or not.
    ## rank answer if it is helpful ##
    Thanks,
    Ranjan

  • AUC Asset not getting created when Internal Order is created

    Dear Experts,
    While Creating the internal order ( Object Class - Investment Measure)
    AuC (Asset Under Construction) not getting created automaticall . Note Investment profile is already there in the order.
    Following steps below are configured -
    1. Define the AuC Asset Class (with investment measure) - OAOA
    2. Define the Asset Class u2013 for Main Asset - OAOA
    3. Define Investment Profile - OITA
    a. Assign the AuC Asset Class (Step-1) in the investment profile
    4. Assign Investment Profile to Model Order - OITA
    5. Define Order Type (Investment) - KOT2
    a. Settlement Profile - OKO7
    b. Maintain Allocation Structures - OKO6
    Thanks
    Sanjai

    Hi Sreekanth,
    What is the setting needed to create AUC Automatically when an Internal order is created ?
    I have done all the setting, but still when I save Internal order neither AUC asset is getting created.
    So I went to extras selected create AUC and it went to AS01, but when I came back (F3) from AS01 to Internal Order and save , Auc Asset is not getting captured in the settlement rule. I even tried to give manually the AUC Asset in the settlement rule, for which sys is not allowing in the settlement rule.
    Any thoughts are highly appreciated
    Advance Thanks
    Sanjai

  • Transfer Requirement not getting created

    Hi All,
    My query as below;
    Production order is created using KANBAN (Control Cycle/Supply Area is defined) using classic KANBAN.
    WM is in place and all the setting related to TR/TO creation for WM movement type 103 is in place.
    When i am trying to receive this Production after completion it is not creating the TR/TO, while as material document is getting generated and shows the stock directly in interim storage type 901 without creating TR and TO.
    Further i checked there is indicator in Production order i.e "Kanban indicator" that gets checked automatically when Production order is created using KANBAN Processs and if i remove that indicator forcefully, TR and TO is getting created normally.
    Please provide some inputs where can be the problem and how TR and TO can be created normally eventhough KANBAN indicator is checked in Production order and where i can found the setting related to "KANBAN INDICATOR".
    Appreciate your help.

    Hi Maddy
    Thanks very much for your response.
    1. When you use KANBAN, you define separate KANBAN storage location, which is different from WM-managed replenishment storage locations, and separate KANBAN interim storage area with storage bin.
    Yes different storage location is defined which is not WM-managed in supply area.
    As you said Control Cycle is defined, see if the interface is properly defined for both of these Sloc.
    Where i can check whether interface is properly defined or not.
    2. See if you have defined the KANBAN replenishment strategy with Control type Transfer Requirements from a Storage Location which is being controlled by WM in the Customizing for Production under KANBAN > Replenishment Strategies > Define Stock Transfer Strategies
    Actually for a material two strategies are defined like;
    1) In-house Production strategies-0003-
    supply area is defined with storage location which is IM managed.
    And when this order is completed and i am trying to receive this in WM SLOC (usally whatever SLOC we have defined in supply area it proposes that SLOC at the time of receipt but i am changing this manually to WM managed SLOC) using transaction MIGO, it is directly taking the stock to 901 interim storage type and in total the stock increases but the problem is when TR is not getting created i am not able to take this to the storage bin as per strategies defined.
    2) Stock Transfer Strategies-This is working fine and in that TR/TO is working fine.
    3. For TO to get created automatically by the system from the transfer requirement, see if an indicator Automatic TO creation in the replenishment strategy is set or not. Yes this is set for stock transfer strategies but i didn't find option to check the TO creation automatically for in-house production strategy
    4. Also, check that you have set up a suitable replenishment movement type for KANBAN in the Customizing for Warehouse Management under Activities > Transfers > Define Movement Types (i.e.standard is 350 for KANBAN replenishment)-Yes this is also defined correctly.
    Appreciate your more inputs on this.

  • ChaRM transport not getting created

    Hi Experts,
    I am in SP20 EHP1. I am configuring ChRm flow. I have made the copy of SDHF to ZSHF. I have completed all the configurations.  I have made the copy of all the actions & statuses.
    I am having two actions in ZSHF while creating the transport requests as below.
    Option 1: Click the standard action "Set in Development". (copy of standard action). At that time the transport is getting created successfully.
    Option 2: Click the action "Create New Transport request" (Copy of standard action). At that time the transport is NOT getting created. Why i couldn't able create the transport using this copied action? In the transaction data tab ---> Actions tab, the details says that action "Processing HF_EXECUTE_ACTION Is Started" & @5C\QError@     Action could not be successfully executed
    Note:
    But if i use the standard transaction type SDHF, at that time using both standard actions, i could able to create transports.
    Need your valuable input

    Hi,
    Please check for the configurational table for which you are facing problem, its delivery class should be "C" under delivery & maintenance.
    You can get it checked by your ABAP team.
    hope this will help.
    Regards,
    AK

  • Sub node is not getting created

    Hi Experts
    I have IDOC to SOAP scenario, here the subnode is not getting created in the main node. please help me
    Structure is given below
    Source
    Matmas
          IDOC
              e1m -
    (1...9999 ) occurance
    Target
    Target
    XMLDATA  --- (1.. UNBOUNDED)
         SUBNODE1 ---(1.1)
              SUBNODE2 ---(1.)  -- UNDER SUBNODE1
              SUBNODE3----(0...UNBOUNDED) -- UNDER SUBNODE1.
    Quesion 1.
    now i want XMLDATA node to be repeated as many times as e1m comes from source along with both the subnodes 2 and 3 at target side.
    but i could see only subnode2 is getting created not the subnode3 while testing.
    May i know why is this happening.
    I want the SUBNODE3 also be created.
    Note the occurance of SUBNODE3  is 0.. unbounded
    Question 2:
    I want the SUBNODE3 also to be repeated as many times as e1m node comes from source.
    For example:
    e1m comes twice then the target should be as below
    XMLDATA  --- (1.. UNBOUNDED)    
    SUBNODE1 ---(1.1)
              SUBNODE2 ---(1.)  -- UNDER SUBNODE1
              SUBNODE3----(0...UNBOUNDED) -- UNDER SUBNODE1.
    SUBNODE3----(0...UNBOUNDED) -- UNDER SUBNODE1.
    XMLDATA  --- (1.. UNBOUNDED)    
    SUBNODE1 ---(1.1)
              SUBNODE2 ---(1.)  -- UNDER SUBNODE1
              SUBNODE3----(0...UNBOUNDED) -- UNDER SUBNODE1.
    SUBNODE3----(0...UNBOUNDED) -- UNDER SUBNODE1.
    Regards
    Lara

    Please see the below logic:
    E1MARAM --> XMLNODE
    E1MARAM --> useOneAsMany_customUDF -->SUBNODE3
    E1MARAM/MATNR -->  useOneAsMany_customUDF --> SUBNODE3/MATNR
    E1MARAM/xyzfield -->  useOneAsMany_customUDF --> SUBNODE3/xyzfield
    Source:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <MATMAS05>
       <IDOC>
          <E1MARAM>
             <MATNR>123</MATNR>
          </E1MARAM>
          <E1MARAM>
             <MATNR>1234</MATNR>
          </E1MARAM>
       </IDOC>
    </MATMAS05>
    Target
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <ns0:MT_Test xmlns:ns0="urn:test-2:test:area">
       <XMLDATA>
          <SUBNODE1>
             <SUBNODE2/>
             <SUBNODE3>
                <MATNR>123</MATNR>
             </SUBNODE3>
             <SUBNODE3>
                <MATNR>1234</MATNR>
             </SUBNODE3>
          </SUBNODE1>
       </XMLDATA>
       <XMLDATA>
          <SUBNODE1>
             <SUBNODE2/>
             <SUBNODE3>
                <MATNR>123</MATNR>
             </SUBNODE3>
             <SUBNODE3>
                <MATNR>1234</MATNR>
             </SUBNODE3>
          </SUBNODE1>
       </XMLDATA>
    </ns0:MT_Test>
    useOneAsMany_customUDF
    for(int i =0;i<var1.length;i++)
       for(int j=0;j<var1.length;j++)
          result.addValue(var1[j]);
        result.addContextChange();
    Hope it helps!

  • Excise invoice should not get created without PGI

    Hi,
    I have a scenario where the billing document is being generated by the customer without PGI after creation of outbound delivery for exports. (This is as per customer's requirement - Copy control maintained in VTFL for the same - copying requirements 11 )
    This creates a situation - excise invoice can be created without PGI - which creates problems for customer. This should not happen.
    Customer wants a check during the excise invoice creation - excise invoice should not get created if PGI has not been done.
    Kindly advise as to how this can be done.
    Regards,
    T Saravanan

    Dear Saravanan
    Two options are there
    -  in your existing routine itself, you can specify the control in such a way that unless the preceding document is PGId
    -  apply excise user exits like J_1I7_USEREXIT_EXCISE_BEF_SAVE to achieve the requirement.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Invoice is not getting created in Order related billing

    Dear all,
    I am trying to do a Order related billing. After creating the order i am going to VF01 and selecting the billing type i have created and trying to create the invoice. I am getting the error "No billing documents were generated. See log" when i am checking the Log its showing now errors.
    In case if my account determination procedure is wrong, system should allow me to create a Sales invoice and accounting document will not be generated. But in this case even the sales invoice is also not getting created.
    Please suggest me if there are any configuration changes i need to do to overcome this problem.

    Apart from the suggestion already given, also ensure that
    the order is not showing in incomplete log
    the order is not blocked for credit limit
    You can also cross check in VF04 whether system is fetching that sale order.  For information, once you execute VF04, by default, system will check only "Delivery related" check box.  You have to manually select "Order related" check box.
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • File not getting created in a different server

    My requirement.
    I have written a code in the BI system and now need to write an empty file (say a.done)in a directory /interfaces of PI system.
    I wrote using open data set and close data set however the file (a.done) is not getting created in the PI system even though the directory /interfaces exist.
    When I give any directory of that of BI system ,the file(a.done) is getting created i.e the file is getting created on the same server and not on the different server.
    Is there any function module or any other way for the file to get generated in the PI system.
    Please explain with an example.
    Regards,
    Vish

    Try to use  search FTP in se37 or checkout the below FM
    CALL FUNCTION 'EPS_FTP_MPUT'
      EXPORTING
        RFC_DESTINATION            =
    *   FILE_MASK                  = ' '
    *   LOCAL_DIRECTORY            = ' '
    *   REMOTE_DIRECTORY           = ' '
    *   OVERWRITE_MODE             = ' '
    *   TEXT_MODE                  = ' '
    *   TRANSMISSION_MONITOR       = 'X'
    *   RECORDS_PER_TRANSFER       = 10
    *   MONITOR_TITLE              =
    *   MONITOR_TEXT1              =
    *   MONITOR_TEXT2              =
    *   PROGRESS_TEXT              =
    * IMPORTING
    *   LOCAL_DIRECTORY            =
    *   REMOTE_DIRECTORY           =
    *   LOCAL_SYSTEM_INFO          =
    *   REMOTE_SYSTEM_INFO         =
    * TABLES
    *   FILE_LIST                  =
    * EXCEPTIONS
    *   CONNECTION_FAILED          = 1
    *   INVALID_VERSION            = 2
    *   INVALID_ARGUMENTS          = 3
    *   GET_DIR_LIST_FAILED        = 4
    *   FILE_TRANSFER_FAILED       = 5
    *   STOPPED_BY_USER            = 6
    *   OTHERS                     = 7
    IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
    * Implement suitable error handling here
    ENDIF.

  • Weblogic Domain not getting created in SOA Suite 11g R2

    I have installed the components of SOA Suite 11g R2 (11.1.1.3) on a single Windows XP SP3 machine (32 bit) following recommended procedures. I tried to configure Weblogic server using Domain Configuration utility. After navigating hrough the wizard, no Weblogic server profile is getting created in the doamin folder. Even the WL Admin server is not getting created. The Domain Configuration utility did not throw any errors.
    1) Is this problem related to Oracle repository for SOA suite 11g?
    2) Can the repository schemas (Oracle) hold multiple weblogic SOA domain information?

    Hi,
    Weblogic servers directory do not gets created after domain creation or even managed server configuration. It will present itself only when you start the managed server for the first time, that is when it initializes all security attributes, diagnostic attributes (if configured) , etc..
    Perform server start and then check if it gets created or not.
    ## rank answer if it is helpful ##
    Thanks,
    Ranjan

  • BP not getting created while creating employee

    Hi,
    When I Hire an employee a BP should be created for it. It used to happen earlier in the system but after we moved to another system this is not working.  Can someone please let me know the necessary config for this?
    I've the following settings:
    HRALX   ONUMB  = 2
    HRALX   OSUBG = MD
    The MD number range is from 90000000 to 9999999999. Should this number range be internal or external?
    When I use the HR_SYNC_PERSON report for an employee I get the error as
    "Determination of connections to object 'BP' of 'CP' '50000201' failed"
    "Object of type 'US' with ID '1122' does not exist or is inconsistent"
    "Determination of connections to object 'BP' of 'O' '50000101' failed" etc
    Also I need to upload the employee master data using LSMW and BP does not get created with LSMW also? Is there some specific config while using LSMW?
    Please help.

    Whenever you are uploading employees using LSMW, you need to run program HR_SYNC_PERSON.
    Pls refer to the following thread for further info:
    Assignment: Business partner for person '50000029' is not unique
    Regards,
    Dilek

  • Accounting doucment not get created for Credit Memo

    Hi
        When creating a cancellation doucment(vf11) for credit memo accounting document not get created.While I go for analysis then it is determining the G/L account.But not getting created the accounting doucment.
    When i select "Release to accounting" then it is giving a message like this:
    "Automatic clearing of billing document 951
    and canc. doc. 90000572 not poss."  as informatiion first
    and then later it is throwing an error message that "maintain correct number range"
    While for the same material or earlier cancellation happened and accounting doucment get created.
    Please help me out;How would i get this solved?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    You may also check for Number Range - Maintainance & Assignment.
    T. Code: SNRO
    Table/ View: RV_BELEG
    Here, Mantain Number Range.
    To Assign,
    T. Code: SM30
    T.Code: Bill_Num (or select if different in your case)
    Assign No. range to your combination of Sales OrgDist.ChannelBill Type i.e. for Cancelled Billing Doc. Type
    To Maintain Number Range for Accounting Documents,
    T. Code: FBN1
    Best Regards,
    Amit

  • SRM PR is not getting created in ECC backend

    Hello Experts,
    We are running SRM 7.0 with SRM-MDM Catalog, we are using SRM for shopping.  We do have PI 7.11 running in the Environment as well.
    We are on ECC 6.0 with Ehp 4.0
    Purchase Order:
    However we can see the PO creating successfully using PI.
    Question, in the SRM table (BBP_FUNCTION_MAP), we see the object type: BUS2012 for ERP 4.0 has adapter name: /SAPSRM/CL_SOA_ADPT_PO_CRT_ERP for when creating PO. Please see teh screen shot.
    is this the reason that we need PI?
    Purchase Requisition:
    PR Creation is not working:
    PR is not getting created in the ERP, PR uses Object type: BUS2105, Adpater CL_BBP_BS_ADAPTER_RQ_CRT_470 for ERP 4.0 System type, can you please tell me if the adapter is correct for ERP 4.0 system type?
    I also have a question to ask:
    1) Where did you see that PR/PO was send to PI System (PI1)? My understanding is that since ERP amd SRM are 2 ABAP Systems, why we cannot send the PR/PO directly to ERP system from SRM? Why do we need a middleware(PI) in between for this process? We should be able to USE BAPI function to do it correct?
    Please advice.
    Thanks
    Kumar

    yes, i could see a PR number with all this additional details as below.
    Table   BBP_PDBEI
    CLIENT                       453                                                              Client
    GUID                         4CAEFA58EB9D005CE1008000AC1C2031                                 Globally Unique identifier
    BE_LOG_SYSTEM                QA1400                                                           Logical System of Logistics Backend
    BE_OBJ_ITEM                                                                                Follow-On Object Item in Back-End System
    BE_OBJECT_TYPE               BUS2105                                                          Follow-On Document Object Type in Back-End System
    BE_OBJECT_ID                 2000000167                                                       Follow-On Document Object ID in Back-End System
    BE_REFOBJ_TYPE                                                                                Reference Object Type in Back-End System
    BE_REFOBJ                                                                                Reference Object in Back-End System
    BE_REFOBJ_ITEM                                                                                Reference Object Item in Back-End System
    BE_REFOBJ_SBITM                                                                               Reference Object Sub-Position in Backend System
    BE_REFOBJ_TYPE2                                                                               Reference Object Type in Back-End System
    BE_REFOBJ2                                                                                Reference Object in Back-End System
    BE_REFOBJ_ITEM2                                                                               Reference Object Item in Back-End System
    BE_REFOBJ_FYEAR2             0000                                                             Reference Document Object - Fiscal Year in Back-End System
    BE_STGE_LOC                                                                                Storage location
    BE_PLANT                     2016                                                             Plant
    BE_BATCH                                                                                Batch Number
    BE_VAL_TYPE                                                                                Valuation type
    BE_MOVE_REAS                 0000                                                             Reason for Movement
    BE_EXPERYDATE                00000000                                                         Shelf Life Expiration Date
    BE_PUR_GROUP                 206                                                              Purchasing group
    BE_PUR_ORG                   2000                                                             Purchasing organization
    BE_CO_CODE                   2000                                                             Company Code
    BE_DOC_TYPE                  CLRQ                                                             Purchase Requisition Document Type
    BE_ACCREQUIRED                                                                                Account Assignment for Logical Backend Required
    BE_SP_STK_IND                                                                                Key for Special Stock Section
    BE_INFO_REC                                                                                Number of purchasing info record
    BE_MOVE_TYPE                 201                                                              Movement type (inventory management)
    BE_PACKNO                    0000000000                                                       Package number
    BE_INTROW                    0000000000                                                       Internal line number for limits
    BE_ITEM_TEXT                                                                                Short Text of a Service Purchase Order Item
    BE_PO_PRICE                  1                                                                Price from Backend
    BE_UNLOAD_PT                 200                                                              Unloading Point in Backend
    BE_DEL_IND                                                                                Deletion Indicator in Backend Documents
    BE_TRACKING_NO                                                                                Requirement Tracking Number
    BE_COND_TYPE                                                                                Condition Key
    BE_COND_STEP                 000                                                              Level Number
    BE_COND_COUNTER              00                                                               Condition counter

  • WBS Elements not getting created in ECC Project System from CRM 7.0

    Dear all,
    We are trying to integrate SAP CRM 7.0 with SAP ECC-PS module. The objective is to bring in the marketing plan and elements data from the CRM system, and to create the corresponding WBS in project system. We have done most of the configuration as recommended by SAP in both the systems, and we see that the BDOCS are getting generated and sent to the ECC system. The following steps have been successfully completed:
    1.       Set up the RFC connections between the two systems
    2.       Selected the connection type as Middleware in CRM system.
    3.       Installed the cProject Add on in CRM box.
    4.       Created a project scenario (with project and network profiles) in the PS system and assigned the same in the CRM system.
    5.       The Project Scenario in PS config has the same name as the Project Type in CRM config.
    6.       Created and released the campaign ids being created in the CRM system.
    As already mentioned, we can see that the BDOCS are coming to the ECC system and are getting stored in BDOC_TRACK table. However the issue is that the corresponding WBS elements are not getting generated in the ECC system. Is there anything that that we are missing in the ECC box which would trigger the WBS element creation?
    Request you all to share your inputs which would be immensely beneficial for us in achieving this integration.
    Thanks and Kind Regards,
    Aditya Shrivastava

    Hello Aditya,
    We too are facing this issue.. if you have resolved the issue could you please let us know the solution ?
    Some inputs related to our system,
    We have upgrade from CRM 4.0 to CRM 7.0 SP07 and R/3 backend system is on 4.7 SP27, earlier we have completed the upgrade on sandbox without any issues which was upgrade to CRM 7.0 SP04 but with SP07 we are facing the problem of WBS Element not getting created in R/3.
    Your help is highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sumukh Kapoor.

Maybe you are looking for