NIC problems on Solaris 10 X86

This has probably been asked/answered before but I couldn't locate it. My X86 install finally went through but I can't see weither (of 2) NIC cards, one is a D-link DFE-530 TX + and I have added the driver_alias commands but still can't see anything but localhost from ifconfig -a, any help would be appreciated...been up for 24 hours now.

There have been at least two different cards from Dlink, with similar model names.
There is the discontinued DFE-530TX and there is a current DFE-530TX+ model.
You may need to take the card out and confirm the actual model.
While you do that, examine the card and find its actual ethernet chipset.
If I recall corectly, the older card uses the DEC21140 family chip, which works natively in Solaris(x86) 7, 8, 9, and 10.
Dlink's website suggests the TX+ card uses the Realtek RTL8139 chipset,
and Dlink has a Unix driver package available for download for that 'plus' card,
although it is bundled inside their Windows-formatted self-extracting driver file for some ungodly reason.
So ... if you have the older card, it should just work.
And ... If you have the newer card, then you may as well get the drivers straight from RealTek.

Similar Messages

Problem Oracle10G Installation in Solaris-x86

Hai,
I am facing problem when installing Oracle10g on solaris machine.
I created user and group for oracle and also changed some kernel properties.after changing all requirements i am trying to run runInstaller...but it gave exception like this ...
Exception:
Starting Oracle Universal Installation...
Checking Installation requirements...
Checking Operating System version :
must be 5.6,5.7,5.8,5.9 Actual 5.10
failed <<<<
exsting oracle universal installer.log for this session can be found at /tmp/orainstaller/datetime....
I am using ---
Oracle version : Oracle Database 10g Release 1(10.1.0.3) for Solaris x86
Solaris Version : Solaris 5.10
can any one help me out from this problem....
Thanks in advance ....
-Lakesh

Oracle 10G release 1 only support up to Solaris 9.
You probably need to install 10G release 2. The second release of major Oracle version is always more stable anyway.
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/install.102/b15697/pre_install.htm#sthref110

Oracle 8i/9i on Solaris x86[Intel]...

Hello All,
I would like to know if Oracle 8i or 9i is available for Solaris Intel [x86] version. Its there for the SPARC platform. It would be nice if anyone could let me know about this. I need it to practise for my OCA/OCP exams....
Thanking you'll. Kindly email me on [email protected]
Best Wishes,
Plascio

A part the risk that instance crash can lead to validated transaction loss, Oracle 8i can run without no problems on Solaris 2.6 intel (I really found this problem on 2.7 but I think it exists also on 2.6)

Solaris x86 with card on-board

Hi all,
I got a problem when installing Solaris9 x86 on ibm NetVista Machine.
I have installed 2 other machines with separated network card sucessfully. I can configure to connecto to my LAN network.
But when install on 2 ibm NetVista machines (which include onboard network card ), It is fail to be configured to connect to the network in both following cases:
Case 1: I choose proper driver as Sun suggest for Intel VE Pro(R) 10/100 : iprb. And the Solaris detect successfully. I checked by "ifconfig -a" and saw the network card active on "iprb0".
Next, I following correct instructions to configure the network card to connect to the LAN. But when i ping IP (9.187.186.18) to other computer in our same subnet LAN,
The system display eg: "No anwer from 9.187.186.18"
I run the "snoop" command to view broadcasr ARP in an other terminal. The snoop terminal displays ARP signal boradcasting from the Solaris. However, it can nerver get ARPs from other computer in LAN.
Case 2: I add 3COM network driver to the solaris ( onboard card is no loger used ). The system can auto-detected this card and i can configure to connect to the network. The problem remain unchange.
Is there any special in IBM Netvista machine need to be configure under Solaris x86 or any particular configuarion for on-board network card. ???
Can any boy help me to solve this problem ??
Best regards,
Thang,
Vietsoftware Developer

However, it can nerver get ARPs from other computer in LAN.Are you perhaps running "snoop" on a box different from the one that you're trying to ping, and are you using
a switched ethernet? In that case it would be OK if you only see the ARP broadcast, because the ping target
box will send the ARP reply directly to the MAC of the requesting station (i.e. there's no ARP broadcast reply),
and an ethernet switch will send the ARP reply directly to the port where the station with the given destination
MAC is connected - no other port should see the reply.
If you're trying to ping 9.187.186.18 from the new Solaris x86 box, try to run snoop on the 9.187.186.18
system. 9.187.186.18 should see the ARP broadcast from the LAN, and the 9.187.186.18 box should list the
ARP response it sends back to the LAN.
Is there any special in IBM Netvista machine need to be configure under Solaris x86 or any particular
configuarion for on-board network card. ???I guess the interrupt handler for the NIC is not working, so the Solaris x86 sees no incomming packets.
See the "troubleshooting" section on the following page:
http://solaris-x86.org/documents/tutorials/rtls.mhtml

Content Server 6.0 Installation problem on Solaris

When I installed Content_Server_6.0_SP1_solaris_oracle on Solaris 10 ,I get the following error in log file.
dbg Bundled JRE is not binary compatible with host OS/Arch or it is corrupt. Testing bundled JRE failed.
How can I resolve it
please help me.
Regards
Sandeep

If I installed any installer for sparc Machine on x86.is there any problem.My Solaris machine is x86.
thanx.
Regards
Sandeep.

UCM 10gR3 installation problem on Solaris

Hi,
I have a problem installing Oracle Content Server 10gR3. When I run the setup script:
*$ cd <path>/UCM/ContentServer/solaris-x86/*
*$ ./setup.sh*
I get the following error:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Installer
I am running Solaris 10 on VirtualBox, and I have Oracle Database 10gR2 Installed. JDK 1.5.0_20 is installed with Solaris, but I have tried different JDK's, with no use.
I tried setting the CLASSPATH environment variable to ".;/usr/jdk/latest/lib;/usr/jdk/latest/jre/lib", and running the script again, but I got the same result.
Any Ideas?
Thanks in Advance.
Ayman Madkour
Edited by: Ayman Madkour on Nov 2, 2010 9:05 AM

hi,
we are working production environment, for that reason we have to install UCM 10gR3 on sun solaries OS.
UCM 11g will it support SUN Solaries OS ??
can you provide me for UCM Installation guide on sun solaries OS.
its very urgent requirement.please provide installation guide for SUN SOLARIES V.10 asap.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: 792821 on Nov 30, 2010 11:20 AM

Install error for Oracle 10g on Solaris x86 64-bit. NETCA won't run

Hi All,
I'm installing Oracle 10.2.0.1 on Solaris x86 64-bit. I run the Oracle installer and all runs well until the NETCA portion of the install. It then errors (error file below). When i attempt to run NETCA outside of the installer i'm getting the same error output. I have verified my OS version and that all dependent packages are installed. I'm not sure what is causing this. Any help would be greatly appriciated.
thanks, dave
ERROR FILE:
An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM.
Unexpected Signal : 11 occurred at PC=0xFEEF24E8
Function=strchr+0x8
Library=/lib/libc.so.1
Current Java thread:
     at oracle.net.common.NetGetEnv.getDNSDomain(Native Method)
     at oracle.net.ca.ConfigureProfile.setDefaultProfileParams(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.setupConfigObjects(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ca.InitialSetup.<init>(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.net.ca.NetCA.main(Unknown Source)
Dynamic libraries:
0x8050000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/bin/java
0xfefc0000      /lib/libthread.so.1
0xfefd0000      /lib/libdl.so.1
0xfeed0000      /lib/libc.so.1
0xfea00000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so
0xfee80000      /usr/lib/libCrun.so.1
0xfee50000      /lib/libsocket.so.1
0xfedc0000      /lib/libnsl.so.1
0xfeda0000      /lib/libm.so.1
0xfeeb0000      /usr/lib/libsched.so.1
0xfe9a0000      /lib/libm.so.2
0xfed50000      /lib/libscf.so.1
0xfe980000      /lib/libdoor.so.1
0xfe960000      /lib/libuutil.so.1
0xfe940000      /lib/libmd5.so.1
0xfe920000      /lib/libmp.so.2
0xfe8e0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/native_threads/libhpi.so
0xfe890000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libverify.so
0xfe850000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so
0xfe830000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libzip.so
0xf1a00000      /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8.so.3
0xfc780000      /usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/methods_en_US.UTF-8.so.3
0xf13c0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libawt.so
0xf0f90000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/libmlib_image.so
0xf0f30000      /data1/oracle/oracle/jdk/jre/lib/i386/motif21/libmawt.so
0xf0d50000      /usr/dt/lib/libXm.so.4
0xf0cf0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXt.so.4
0xf0cc0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXext.so.0
0xf1890000      /usr/openwin/lib/libXtst.so.1
0xf0c30000      /usr/openwin/lib/libX11.so.4
0xf0be0000      /usr/openwin/lib/libdps.so.5
0xf0a90000      /usr/openwin/lib/libSM.so.6
0xf0a70000      /usr/openwin/lib/libICE.so.6
0xf0a30000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnjni10.so
0xefe00000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libclntsh.so.10.1
0xefc60000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libnnz10.so
0xf0a10000      /lib/libkstat.so.1
0xefc40000      /lib/libgen.so.1
0xefc20000      /lib/librt.so.1
0xefbf0000      /lib/libaio.so.1
0xefbd0000      /data1/oracle/oracle/lib32/libldapjclnt10.so
Heap at VM Abort:
Heap
def new generation total 576K, used 343K [0xf1e00000, 0xf1ea0000, 0xf22e0000)
eden space 512K, 55% used [0xf1e00000, 0xf1e467f8, 0xf1e80000)
from space 64K, 96% used [0xf1e80000, 0xf1e8f798, 0xf1e90000)
to space 64K, 0% used [0xf1e90000, 0xf1e90000, 0xf1ea0000)
tenured generation total 1408K, used 338K [0xf22e0000, 0xf2440000, 0xf5e00000)
the space 1408K, 24% used [0xf22e0000, 0xf2334ab8, 0xf2334c00, 0xf2440000)
compacting perm gen total 4096K, used 3580K [0xf5e00000, 0xf6200000, 0xf9e00000)
the space 4096K, 87% used [0xf5e00000, 0xf617f170, 0xf617f200, 0xf6200000)
Local Time = Tue Aug 29 13:49:22 2006
Elapsed Time = 225
# The exception above was detected in native code outside the VM
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (1.4.2_05-b04 mixed mode)
#

I have the same problem on Linux Debian 3.0.
My /etc/hosts looks like:
127.0.0.1     localhost.localdomain     localhost
#192.168.100.1     bt.lan.home     bt
#192.168.100.5     jacek.lan.home     jacek
# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
::1     ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
ff02::1 ip6-allnodes
ff02::2 ip6-allrouters
ff02::3 ip6-allhostsPlease help.

How to integrate a Solaris x86 server on Sun Management Center ?

Hello people,
I want to integrate a Solaris x86 server on Sun Management Center platform.
If I'm not wrong, SunMC doesn't run for Solaris x86, server and client only as console with Java.
In speat of it, I try to install Sun Management Center 3.0 Agent for Solaris x86.
It seems to be ok, install packages, but when execute es-setup script, intents to create the following directory:
/opt/SUNWsymon/base/bin/sparc-sun-solaris2.8
I supose that in this directory, SunMC will install sparc binary files
At this point, I can't follow the installation and abort it.
Can anybody give me ideas to install and integrate my solaris x86 server on SunMC ?
Thanks

Hi Hisham,
hishooooo wrote:
Dear Gents,
I have one X86 Solaris Server configured and installed to be Sun Management Center Server.
successfully i could monitor the Sun Solaris Servers after i have installed the SMC agent on them.
my problem is that i could not install the SMC agent on Red Hat Linux. as i could not find an easy document or steps to do so.
could you guide please?If you still have a copy of your SunMC media around, the same ["es-inst"|http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-2215/command-line-1?l=en&a=view] program you use to install Solaris Agents should work on Linux as well. It autodetects OS type and will install Solaris packages or RPMs as appropriate.
Regards,
[email protected]
http://www.HalcyonInc.com

Help with evaluation for Solaris x86

Hello,
I would like to evaluate Oracle Identity Manager and Access Manager products at the latest version possible -- the host system(s) are Solaris x86 (SunOS .5.10) Unfortunately, I am having a bit of trouble compiling the list of packages/versions to achieve this for this platform. For instance, on the downloads page it appears that OIM is not available for Solaris x86, not even in older versions(?)
Thank you in advance,
Scott

Hi Scott,
I'm pretty sure that x86 Solaris is not yet certified to run the Identity Management suite. I've been involved in an evaluation process and we ran it all on RedHat Enterprise Server Release 4 Update 5, without too many problems.
cheers,
James

Core 2 Duo and solaris x86 11/06 works for me

This is FYI, since I seen (and posted) problems, but I haven't seen the solution posted.
I have successfully gotten solaris x86 11/06 to install and run on my core 2 duo machine. I had tried solaris x86 06/06, but I could only run in 32bit mode until patch 118855-19 was installed. It looks like 118855-33 is the baseline for 11/06.
With 06/06 I had to edit the grub command and add " kernel/unix" to the end of the 2nd line. This would force 32 bit mode rather than 64 bit. If I tried 64 bit, it would enter an endless reboot cycle. Once I installed the patch to 118855-19 I could run solaris 10 06/06 in 64 bit mode without issue.
Again, since solaris 10 11/06 is at 118855-33, it runs on my core2 machine straight from the install.
Hope this helps

On a laptop there is little point with running a 64-bit operating system unless it physically has more than 4gb of ram, or if you are processing datasets exceeding 4GB of ram. Unless you're into assembly or use Solaris for some reason to manipulate media, little is to be gained by using 64-bit versions if anything. The increased pointer, integer, and padding causes more memory to use for the same software, most software on 64-bit operating systems runs in 32-bit mode because there is no need to have 16 exabyte memory addressing capability for anything but media encoders, giant databases, or extremely bloated single-threaded software. Sun Java Creator takes a heck of a lot of ram, but even at peak it's still under 4GB. If you move files bigger than 4GB, the ability to memory map all 4096MB might have less overhead on a 64-bit operating system, but generally from an end-user perspective, especially on a fast Intel or Opteron system, you won't notice the difference much. Solaris is bi-arch, a large chunk of Windows Vista and XP x64 is bi-arch, and most of FreeBSD and Linux are bi-arch in 64-bit versions, as I said, no point in making everything 64-bit. 64-bit device drivers is an issue for every OS, you should stick with 32-bit on a laptop, and hold off on desktops unless you need extended assembly registers available only in 64-bit mode.

Solaris-x86 mount fat32 partition, the partition max size limit?

solaris10 x86, laptop, 10G FAT32 partition for windows & x86 exchange data.
the fat32 partition mount as normal, can be read fine.
but write some file by x86, that can not find by windows.
anyboy know did the solaris-x86 mount fat32 partition, the partition max size limit? or no limit, why this problem occur?

Mounting Windows partition in Solaris
The easiest way to share data now is to do it through a FAT32 partition. Solaris
recognises it as partition of type pcfs. It is specified as device:drive where drive is
either the DOS logical drive letter (c through z) or a drive number (1 through 24).
Drive letter c is equivalent to drive number 1 and represents the Primary DOS partition
on the disk; drive letters d through z are equivalent to drive numbers 2 through 24,
and represent DOS drives within the Extended DOS partition.Syntax is
mount -F pcfs device:drive /directroy-name
where directory name specifies the location where the file system is mounted.
To mount the first logical drive (d:) in the Extended DOS partition from an IDE hard
disk in the directory /d use
mount -F pcfs /dev/dsk/c0d0p0:d /d
You can use mount directory-name after appending following line is in
/etc/vfstab file
device:drive directory-name pcfs no rw
for example
c0d0s0:c /c pcfs no rw
If your windows partition like the following means
C: - NTFS, D:-FAT32, E:-NTFS, F:-FAT32
Then you can only mount D, F not C & E.
Mounting D Drive:
mount -F pcfs /dev/disk/c0d0p0:c /mountpoint
Mounting F Drive
mount -F pcfs /dev/disk/c0d0p0:d /mountpoint
The driveletter only for fat not including other file systems (ntfs or any linux filesystems).

Problems installing Solaris 10 on Dell PowerEdge 800

Hi,
I am experiencing some trouble when I attempt to install Solaris 10 on a Dell PowerEdge 800. It is equipped with two RAID disks controlled by a Dell CERC SATA 1.5/6ch (according to the BIOS).
The installation program reports that it cannot write to the disk. This happens when it is about to start installing files. Tried setting it to a single volume and disable RAID. Same thing. Read another article saying something about disabling IDE, well it doesn't seem to help ...
Any hints?

I have the same problem on a dell 750 with the SERC controller. I can add some more information but if you get a solution I would appreciate the detail.
1) If I install Solaris via the SERC in RAID 1 mode then the alarm on the SERC goes off as soon as I start to write to the disk.
2) I bypassed the SERC and installed on a single disk straight off the motherboard. Time the install crashed at the same point but this time the error message told me that the first available cylinder was number 3! Ah
3) I reconnected the disk via the SERC, rebuilt the RAID array and made a mistake. I created a RAID 0 (striped) array and installed the software starting from cylinder 3. I got a complete solaris install that rebooted fine and is fully working.
BUT I NEED A MIRRORED SYSTEM SO
4) I rebuild the machine again this time RAID 1 and again the crash occured at exactly the same point i.e. as soo as I start to write to the disk.
Whether or not DELL / Adaptec support Solaris should not be an issue. This is a BIOS configurable RAID controller that can be fully serviced (e.g. disks replaced) from the BIOS. The system sees the array as a disk via the controller and indeed it is seeing it.
The SERCs own data configuration data should be on sectors which are not visible to solaris VIA the SERC so we shouldnt be able to damage them but I suspect that this may not be the case.
I suspect that the answer is in the partition layout and who or what creates them (I dont mean the Solaris slices but the FDISK partitions)
To make matters worse, since I need the machine working I went back to disks straight of the motherboard and configured again and used metadevices to set up a fully mirrored systemas I have done many times before on sparc (but never on Solaris x86)
This worked fine but I thought that I would test bootability in the event of disk failure. There isnt any!
if disk 1 fails then the motherboard wont accept disk 2 unless you swap the cables and move it do disk 1 and by then the boot sectors are wrong for the address of the device. I can probably solve this by building both disks in slot one but who wants a mirrored server that you have to open up and move a cable when the disk fails. I think I may have to ditch SATA and go back to SCSI !

Vantec PCIe SATA controller, Solaris x86

I've searched all the online resources I can find, and don't see an answer to this. Is there a driver for this SATA controller for Sol. x86, and if so, where would I find it?
Output of uname -X:
System = SunOS
Node = p810
Release = 5.10
KernelID = Generic_139556-08
Machine = i86pc
BusType = <unknown>
Serial = <unknown>
Users = <unknown>
OEM# = 0
Origin# = 1
NumCPU = 4
Card is a Vantec UGT-IS100R, you can see more about it here:
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?Sku=V13-2602
PC is not COTS but homebuilt from various components. Motherboard is Asus M2N68-AM SE2. The card has one hard drive attached, a Western Digital Caviar, 1 TB. The card's a RAID controller, but with one disk it's obviously not doing any RAID stuff, and it recognizes the drive as a non-RAID device.
Boot drive is a 320 GB SATA connected directly to the motherboard (not to the Vantec). Windows 7, Slackware 12.2, and Solaris all installed just fine; Win7 and Slack recognize the Vantec and attached drive with no problems. Solaris seems to be working well in all other respects.
Thanks!
Phil

A little progress, and some more information.
1) I had downloaded Solaris 10 longer ago than I thought; I now have the latest-n-greatest (10/09). Output of uname -v is Generic_141445-09. This upgrade eliminated a message I was getting during boot with the older version:
ahci_port_reset port 1 the device hardware has been initialized and the power-up diagnostics failed
2) The Vantec card uses the JMicron 363 chip. After doing more web surfing, I found this thread relating to JMicron and OpenSolaris:
http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=376370
Essentially I'm getting the same results as the OP in that thread, except that prtconf already shows my card in AHCI mode. cfgadm -la shows the controller there; cfgadm -c configure results in "failed" status for the controller; and no matter what I can't get it to recognize the attached hard drive.
I don't want to upgrade the card's firmware; having that drive available under Solaris isn't as important as having the card and drive work under Win7 and Slackware, so if I just have to live without it I will. So ... any other ideas? Thanks!
Phil

Solaris x86 11/06 hung on Acer TravelMate 8210 Laptop

I've just installed Solaris x86 11/06 on my Acer TravelMate 8210 laptop. The installation was completed successfully. However, when the system is rebooted into Solaris, it is always hung at:
�Use is subject to license terms.�
This problem happens with both of the 32-bit and 64-bit kernel. While booting with the option �-kv�, the system always stops at:
�PCI Express-device: pci8086,2448@1e, pci_pci0
pci_pci0 is /pci@0,0/pci8086,2448@1e�
I�ve also tried to boot with the �-s� option, but it doesn�t help.
Is there anything else that I can try? Thank you in advance!
Here is my system spec:
http://reviews.cnet.com/Acer_TravelMate_8210_6597_Core_2_Duo_2_GHz_2_GB_RAM_160_GB_HDD/4507-3121_7-32114677.html?tag=nav
Before the installation, I ran the Solaris Installation Check Tool 1.2, and it said that the system is able to run Solaris.

I've just installed the Solaris Express DE 2/07 and still have the same problem.
Message was edited by:
ductuanon

Question about wide-screen monitor on Solaris x86

I have Solaris x86, version 10/2009 installed.
It works fine with any wide-screen monitor I plug in.
But when I use this 3rd party CAD/CAM software, any round
circle is being displayed as an oval shape. I believe that's because
on the wide-screen monitor, the width of the monitor is longer than the height.
Does anyone know if there's a setting to change so that I can view circles as true round circles instead of an oval shape? Thanks.

OK, I know what the problem is now.
But I need to change the resolution settings. Does anyone know how to change it on x86, version 10/2009?
I recall it being something like "kdmconfig"

NIC problems on Solaris 10 X86

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for