Nikon D300 Decoding Numeric EXIF codes how?

In Aperture, many of the EXIF files contain single-digit numbers for items such as metering, exposure mode, etc. I've tried a number of searches, but have thus far been unable to turn up a chart that decodes these numbers into plain language such as Center-Weighted or Exposure Mode. Has anyone else already solved this problem?
Thanks!
Bob

try this on for size ...
http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/EXIF.html

Similar Messages

  • How does LR 1.3.1 support Nikon D300 Active D-Lighting?

    Is somebody able to explain in which way if at all LR 1.3.1 supports the ACTIVE D-Lighting facility of the new Nikon D300?
    The user manual explains that this function works directly on the RAW file and not on the jpeg like the normal D-Lighting of the D300, therefore I guess LR supports this function in some ways.
    In some german photo forums there are discussions going on if it works at all and if it works how it could work, unfortunately nobody really knows anything precise about it, just too much guesswork.
    I would be very happy if it anybody, hopefully from the development team, could shed some light into this topic.
    If LR doesn't support it, would it be better to shoot in jpeg fine with the active D-Lighting function switched on and do the required changes in LR based on jpeg instead of RAW?
    Thanks a lot, Andreas.

    It doesn't. The way that feature works on the RAW file is that it simply underexposes a little. Otherwise it is basically the same RAW file. The magic is all in the RAW processing. You can get the same effect on the RAW data by decreasing the ISO while keeping shutter and aperture constant. SInce Lightroom cannot read the tag in the RAW file that says, this is a active lighting image, it just interprets it as any other RAW file. I think someone from the ACR team posted on this ages ago in the ACR forum when the D300 came out. In general, do not expect Lightroom or ACR to use any of the camera maker's proprietary features if you shoot RAW. The active D-lighting effect is basically similar to the shadows, recovery and clarity control combined in an automatic adjustment. So you can mimic it yourself if you want.

  • How can i open a raw nikon D300s file in photoshop 7.0.1? [was: rescueranch]

    How can i open a raw nikon D300s file in photoshop 7.0.1?

    The D300s was first supported in Camera Raw 5.5
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html
    Raw 5.5 is only compatible with Photoshop CS4 and later
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/camera-raw-compatible-applications.html
    Your options:
    Join the Cloud, or
    Buy CS6, or
    Convert the Raw files from the D300s to DNGs using Adobe's free DNG converter
    http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/extend.displayTab2.html
    Then edit the DNGs in Photoshop 7.0.1

  • Unable to open Nikon D300 Raw in CS2. Why? How fix?

    I use Photoshop CS2, latest Vers. (9.0.2) and I have the Adobe Camera Raw latest update for CS2, vers. 3.7, installed, and confirmed via the help menu that it IS installed. I use Windows XP professional 5.1 serv. pack 2. Camera is a Nikon D300 which shoots RAW as well as JPG. I am unable to open camera raw ("NEF") photos. Get a message, "Could not complete your request because it is not the right kind of document."
    I have no clue why PS won't open the NEF. The only thing close on Adobe's help documents suggests that if I've installed Nikon's own Capture software, it could interfere. But I HAVE NOT installed that software, and have held off for exactly this reason to avoid any possible conflicts.
    I'd appreciate any help anyone can offer. Right now I'm frustrated beyond words both by the problem and by Adobe's online 'help.'

    The Nikon D300 was introduced after the latest (and last) ACR plug-in for CS2.
    A workaround is: download the latest DNG converter, convert yor NEF's to DNG format.
    This universal DNG format
    can be read by ACR 3.7.
    Hope this helps,
    Rob

  • How can i import raw files into iphoto from my Nikon D300?

    Just got a Nikon D300, and it will import jpg and tff, but not raw (nef) files-i prefer iphoto to their software- Nikon says to try talking to apple to find a way to do it- does anyone know any info that can help? I need to decide if I am keeping the camera-from other posts it doesn't look like buying aperture will help either- thanks.

    I would not ditch a camera because of this! If you like the camera, there will always be a way to import Canikon RAW files, though you may need to do some upgrading, and it may take some time for Apple to support a new camera.
    Message was edited by: Keith Barkley

  • How do i view Nef format pictures downloaded  from  Nikon D300 to Ps Cs3

    Hello,
    Wonder if any one can help.
    Trying to download camera raw format pictures from a Nikon D300 into photoshop CS3. All that can be seen is the icons ( but no picture) . A dialoge box appears with a message saying that 'Ps does not support this type of file' ( ie. Nef) and therefore cannot show it.
    Downoading to Photoshop bridge, the same issue appears where the icons are visible ( but no mininature image is shown.
    many thanks

    Robert-
    If your PSCS3 version is fully upgraded it should read Nikon D300 files via built-in ACR without difficulty. If not, contact Adobe tech support. DNG... no thank you.
    IMO you should also be running under either OS 10.4.11 or 10.5.3.
    ACR works fine if one prefers a Photoshop Bridge or Lightroom workflow, but better NEF conversion (and IMO workflow) is available to owners of strong Macs via Apple's Aperture. Best quality NEF conversions come from Nikon View (free) and from Nikon Capture NX, but IMO Nikon's workflow is lethargic.

  • Using Aperture with an external Hard Drive and my new camera (Nikon D300s)

    I have an older MacBook pro- basically had option upgrade comp or camera- went with the new Nikon D300s... my pro was maxed out so a friend helped me transfer my library to my external Harddrive (had a tra- after transfer of my library looking at only 721mb left (just a few photos)) but here is the issue- we have it set up when i load my cards that they go right to the external- but two things happen- my raw photos show as 'unsupported format' AND I can't figure out how to edit.... seriously so frustrated I am ready to go with a micro-puker computer and photoshop... this is NUTS! any help... o and I run AP 2 and I ain't dumping any more money in apple until they can show me they are working again... this is eating my profits!

    Well... I am going to say I am not ashamed to admit that I am not 100% sure. I basically gave my computer to my friend who is a computer guru as I was trying to download my first shoot with my new camera and I got a "not enough memory" message- and kinda freaked out.
    I have a WD external HD so it is mac friendly-
    I don't know how he moved it-- I know he said when he set it up to transfer it took close to 14 hours as it is USB (I know I can and should get a firewire port for it) - and to be truthful I don't know if it is referenced or managed. I know that I plug in the external and make sure it shows in on my computer then plug in my card reader and when i plug in my CF card... aperture opens and I set up a new project and it saves to the hard drive... yet is still showing on my aperture lib- so I am confused... and of course my "free" apple care ran out 6 months ago so I can't just call them or drive to denver and have them show me the solution... and I need one as I have a HUGE photo job in like 4 days

  • Some Nikon D300 NEF files don't appear in Bridge CS3 (Mac)

    Hi all,
    I'm using a Nikon D300 and just upgraded to CS3 on my MAC in no small part because the D300 was not supported by CS2. I am running into a problem though.
    I always shoot in both JPEG and RAW modes. When I open Bridge I always see each JPEG version of a shot.
    However, only about 50% of the time can I see the NEF (RAW) version of the thumbnail. The rest of the time I only see a generic "RAW" thumbnail with no image. This sporadic NEF viewability carries over to the preview pane when I select such a NEF file.
    Furthermore, Camera Raw cannot open the NEF files that are not visible in Bridge. When I try opening them I get a message saying "Could not complete your request because Photoshop does not recognize this file type."
    I have tried purging the Cache (through Tools) as some indicated in other forums threads but this has not helped. I have also downloaded the ACR 4.4 plugin and installed it in the correct library location.
    Has anyone else experienced this (whether on a Nikon or other camera)? Any advice?
    Thanks

    I've finally solved the problem with having only some of my NikonD300 NEF files viewable in Bridge/readable by Photoshop! Jon Michael Riley had said he was having similar problems so I wanted to make sure he and anyone else has the info on what worked for me.
    The issue does not have anything to do with purging the thumbnail cache or installing the latest version of Camera RAW 4.4.1. While they were good suggestions (offered by Adobe's Technical support people also), they do not resolve this particular issue.
    I read that an earlier version of what Jon described as "Nikon's clunky software" had corruption issues when images were first transfered from the camera via Nikon PictureProject Transfer. It looks like the latest incarnation has the same issues. Nikon products can see the transfered images without a problem. HOWEVER, Adobe Bridge/Photoshop cannot rectify the corruption issue caused by transferring photos using Nikon's utility.
    So here's the solution: DO NOT use Nikon PictureProject Transfer! It is a piece of garbage! Instead, make ADOBE PHOTO DOWNLOADER the default tool to transfer images from the camera. To make it default do the following:
    Open Bridge, pull down the Bridge CS3 Preferences. Select the "General" preferences set. On this screen you will see "Behavior". The first clickable box reads "When a camera is connected launch Adobe Photo Downloader". Select this box to render this the default transfer tool.
    If you still have the pictures on your memory cards you can re-transfer them using Adobe Photo Downloader. All your NEF files should now be readable by Bridge/Photoshop. I've told Adobe Tech Support about this problem with Nikon's software. Hopefully they'll be able to check this as an option if others call in with similar problems.
    Unfortunately I have not figured out how to repair the corruption in the files I transfered earlier using Nikon's piece of garbage software. Since I don't have the images on memory cards anymore I can't just re-transfer them. Does anyone have any thoughts on how to do this? Will I ever be able to access my earlier NEF shots?
    Cheers,
    Greg
    Thanks to everyone for trying to help resolve these issues.

  • Error opening New Nikon D300 RAW files on Iphoto and Preview

    hi,
    I've a new Nikon D300 and I've had problems when i try to import the RAW (.NEF) photos to my iphoto... it says that the file is unreadable either on Iphoto or Preview or even on Apple Aperture. How can i solve this problem? is there any update that i can do for that or Apple didn't upgrade the iPhoto yet? I l know the camera can take 14-bit Raw format photos but i'm not sure if it is taking them in 12-bit because it can take both. I have a Nikon D200 too and i've never had any problem uploading my Raw photos to iphoto. the only program that opens the photos yet is Photoshop CS3.
    hope, someone can help me.
    Many Thanks:
    Gonçalo Rendeiro

    hope this 10.5.2 solved the problem
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=306835

  • Viewing Nikon D300 images in finder

    Hi, Is there anyone out there using Nikon D300 with Mac Book Pro under OSX 10.5.1?
    Can you see the thumbnails? Can you see the NEF, TIFF, or PSD files in Finder?
    How do you view your photos?
    In Finder, if you click on one single pictures, does it close down your external drive and put you back in a clean desktop?
    Is there a fix? Is there a work around?
    Please help.
    Yes: it works find in LR and PS, but what about Finder and iphoto / email?

    The issue should only occur if you shoot raw. Currently OS X can only display/read certain RAW camera formats. These are OS level, meaning iPhoto, Preview, Mail, Aperture and others are effected. However adobe products are different because they use Adobe Camera RAW.
    I would expect JPEGs TIFFs and PSDs, both thumbnails and files, to view fine. RAW files will not view from the D300, but the D200 is supported.
    There is no way of knowing when support for the (not-so-)new files will be available. Rumor has it it will be 10.5.2, but only Apple knows that. You can head on over to the Aperture forum and read to see if some have work-arounds.

  • Aperture suddenly displaying "unsupported format" for Nikon D300s RAW files

    I am using Aperture 3.1.3 on my iMac 24 with Snow Leopard 10.6.8.   A couple of days ago I applied an update for Aperture RAW files that was in my update list, even though I don't use any of the cameras involved. 
    After that update Aperture gives me an "unsupported format" error on all my Nikon D300s RAW files. Every RAW file in the library.  I have never had a problem with this at any time over the last 2+ years of using Aperture.
    I have tried using time machine and rolling Aperture back to the end of July (my most recent backup) along with rolling back the RAW file plist. I then did a repair permissions, and reimported the photos after this.  I have rebooted numerous times.  All to no avail.  I have not yet tried a library rebuild that would be next if I must.
    I use a Referenced library, so I was able to check out individual RAW files with Adobe Camera RAW.   They open fine so there is no file corruption issue. 
    Any thoughts on what might be happening?  Any other file(s) associated with RAW conversion that I might need to roll back?   I do not see any mention of a problem like this when searching the web or the forum (although I may have missed something by not searching the correct terms).
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!

    The raw camera bundle is  /System/Library/CoreServices/RawCamera.bundle
    Go to /System/Library/CoreServices with the Finder, locate the the RawCamera.bundle package, select it and then do a File->Get Info on the package. You should have version 3.8.0, that is the latest and the one that you should have downloaded last week. If it is not 3.8.0 stop here and post back what version you do have, something isn't right.
    Assuming you have 3.8.0  use the Finder to navigate to /System/Library/CoreServices and then delete the RawCamera.bundle package. The Finder will ask you to authorize the delete.
    Then go to Digital Camera RAW Compatibility Update 3.7 download and install it. That will put you back to the last CameraRaw update before this one.
    See if that fixes your problem.
    As always when messing around with system files it is possible to mess things up so make sure you have a good backup before proceeding, And if any of these instructions make you nervous you might want to hold off doing them.
    good luck

  • Over exposure downloading from Nikon D300 to lightroom 2.3

    Following upgrade to Lightroom 2.3 when images are downloaded from my Nikon D300 (raw or jpeg) they are all overexposed after quickly appearing in preview.  How do I correct this.  Is this a camera or software problem
    David Neal

    I had the same problem with a D700.
    Applying the Standard profile will correct the colors but not exposure.
    Another thing to check is that you have not unable Advanced D-Light on your camera. Automode is the worst case because you don't even know how much over exposure is set!
    This camera option is a tricky one: it overexpose your photo and make a built in camera process to recover details in the over/under exposed zones.
    LR is not able to read this information (proprietary info in the NEF raw file) so the photo is over-exposed.
    One way is to use the exposure LR cursor (-0.25 can simulate a light ADL..) but you will never have the same photo because Nikon processing is different and specific for each over/under exposed zones: sometime using the LR exposure brush is necessary on this zones (darken a sky for example).
    Antoher thing is to desactive the Nikon ADL. You will then have nearly the same picture between LR Raw and your embedded Jpeg, you only need to  apply the Standard or Neutral LR profil to correct the colors.
    Then, if you want to recover some details in the over/under exposed zones, you  can add a LR exposure brush on these zones. The good thing is that you control manually what Nikon ADL do automatically...

  • Lightroom5 not recognising Nikon D300s RAW files

    Hi,  I have recently upgraded to a new iMac running OSx Mavericks.  Lightroom 5 is not recognising my Nikon d300s raw files (NEF).  According to everything I have read on the net it should as Lightroom is brand new and up to date.
    Any advice.?
    Thanks

    They all show up in the preview view finder but then I get the error message "The following files were not imported because they could not be read" with a list of the files underneath.
    This is the first time I have used Lightroom 5 with the D300s... having just changed computers and upgraded from Lightroom 4. I have also now found out I can't download JPegs either!?!?!? You know that feeling when you think "if it isn't broken don't fix it" that's how I'm feeling right now about buying the new computer and software!!

  • Aperture Nikon D300 RAW: 4304×2852 instead of 4288 × 2848?

    Aperture 2.0 seems to squeeze extra pixels out of my Nikon D300 RAW files compared to Capture NX.
    This messes up Apertures "+auto detection & import+" of RAW+JPG sets when you generate the JPGs using Capture NX. No problem when using the JPGs the camera created: Aperture silently imports those JPGs alongside the RAWs so you can "Generate Version from Master JPG"
    Where do these extra pixels come from, and is this "feature" unique to decoding of D300 files?

    Well both a pain and a blessing
    I used to shoot RAW+JPG and whenever I felt my JPGs were good I just used 'New Version From Master JPG' and select that one as the pick.
    I just imported a bunch of RAWs from a directory in which I also placed the batched Capture JPGs and Aperture was able to 'auto-stack' them by 2. A pitty the order of the first image isn't always the JPG...
    I'm not sure which RAW+JPG workflow is better at the moment

  • Lightroom changes colour in my RAW files captured with NIKON D300

    Dear All! Lightroom changes colour in my RAW files captured with NIKON D300. Some of the images are completely ruined. I am sure Adobe must be aware of this problem. What could be done? Is there a solution? Many thanks for your help. Regards, Stanislav

    You want "something different" but this "something different" is quite hard to define.
    I want a result which reflects the result on the camera. Have the feeling the display
    of the D800 is not the greatest, at least (not only the color issue which is often discussed)
    but also the exposure. Often I think I would need to compensate it, but then afterwards
    on the computer the non corrected version looks most of the time better.
    I think its interesting to see how allergic people react when the word jpeg comes up.
    This is also just a rendered result, just by the camera. There are many options in my cam.
    I like the vivid setting with some modifications. And that gives me a result I like.
    And if I like the result, why shall I spend way more time to replicate it?
    I do not talk about that I would want the jpeg, I only say that what I get color wise out of the
    box is how I would like to look at it. I still want the capability to fix for example exposure  in image,
    but I want the base the version I got from the jpeg view (or how the Nikon raw software could do).
    On Lightroom I did not manage to have a profile that looked as appealing to me.
    It also consumes way more time in my workflow to fix all pictures manually and results might differ.
    To work on an image you need a starting point, I do not say the jpeg look is always perfect and
    what I want all the time, but most of the time it is.
    You say yourself you use profiles. So why should there not be a profile which automatically adjusts to the camera settings.
    Its so frustrating to see a look which you like (the preview image when the pic is first accessed) and
    then Lightroom switches to its own rendering which is flat and which I do not like.
    For me its clearly something Adobe and/or Nikon should fix, like the mentioned "auto correct to preview look",
    Nikon profiles/settings/raw-details in Lightroom or for example a Nikon import module.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Cs6 how to make 2d map come out of 3d earth

    Hiya. I have a pic of earth...like this... and a map graphic like this... the background of both images is alpha ( transparent ). I wanna put the map over the earth and bend it so it conforms to the earth shape kinda close to the the scale and positi

  • Filter mail account in MAIL to PROXY scenario

    Hi all, I have a MAIL to PROXY scenario, and i would like receive emails only from specific adress. I try using Mail Package and add a condition in the receiver determination but it doesn´t work. Is there any way for do this? Regards,

  • Best way to divide iDVD project onto 2 DVDs?

    I have an iDVD project that I've spent sooooooo much time on, and after burning to DVD, the quality was awful (zigzaginess with movement in the shadow areas, etc etc). The project duration is 80:44 minutes. DVD capacity says 4.4GB of 4.2 GB. So would

  • I'm having trouble updating my apps in Creative Cloud.

    I keep getting an error message when the download is almost complete.

  • Lenovo K3 Note - Rooted When Purchased

    I have owned many Lenovo products which I have been very happy with, being satisfied with all their products I decided to purchase a K3 Note mobile phone. I was disappointed to find it was hacked when I purchased it and when I questioned the seller,