No business area is assigned to the material

HI SAP Gurus
I tryed to create a Product cost controller (KKF6n). After I typed the Product version, I get this error "No business area is assigned to the material".
Could yo give me some information about this error.
Thanks
Emre

I checked already. They are assigned.
PLANT- DIV
PLT    DIV    BUARE
Z100   00     Z100
VAL AREA - DIVISION
PLT    DIV    BUARE
Z100   00     Z100
But what I found out under
IMG> E Structure >Assingment > Sales & Organization > Business Area Account assingment > Assign Business Area by Sales Area.
The Sales Area is not assigned to Business area and there is no possibility to assign it. (New Entries )

Similar Messages

No specification is assigned to the material in the BOM item

hello
when I want to create or modify certains BOM (cs02), i have this error message.
It is a warning, but nothing is done in the BOM.
Where does this error come from ?
And how to solve it ?
Thans

see below the error message :
Item material 421Z2811-2001 is not assigned to a specification
    Message no. CM_BOMBOS052
Diagnosis
    No specification is assigned to the material in the BOM item
    00125813-0240.
System Response
    The system cannot create a composition for the bill of material since
    there is no material-specification assignment.
Procedure
    Ensure that the items in the bill of material are assigned to one
    specification in each case before the composition is generated.
    Otherwise errors occur during generation and you have to repeat the
    process.
I Don't know, what is a spécification in a BOM ? Never we have used a "spécification"
@+

BBPGETVD - All backend descriptions are already assigned in the system

Hi together,
My target
I'd like to replicate vendors from R/3 with the same vendor numbers to the organizational structure of SRM.
I execute the transaction: BBPGETVD.
Settings:
System: TERCLNT303 (defined Backendsystem)
Supplier: 4100000005
Object Id: 50000667 (PPOMV_BBP)
x Only Transfer R/3 numbers
Start Transfer
error message "All backend descriptions are already assigned in the system"
If I select: If R/3 Number assignment is not possible: Internal Number Assigmente then the system works and create:
a) BP-Number in table: BUT000
b) R/3 Vendor Number in table: VENMAP.
Why I can't create same vendor numbers in tables: BUT000 and VENMAP ?
Kind Regards
Edited by: Hermann-Josef Wessels on Oct 31, 2010 9:00 PM
Edited by: Hermann-Josef Wessels on Oct 31, 2010 9:15 PM
Edited by: Hermann-Josef Wessels on Oct 31, 2010 9:54 PM

Please can some one guide me here . I am having issue in replicating vendors this was working fine a couple of days back however it has just stopped working .
The error it gives me is the same as
all backend descriptions are already assigned in the system I am maintaining the below number range please can some guide me
below is the SPRO path .
Cross-application components -> SAP Business Partner -> Business Partner -> Basic Settings -> Number Ranges and Groupings
Can some one also let me know where to check in ECC ??
01    0000001999    0000009999    0
AB    0000001000    0000001998    0
MD    9000000000    9999999999    0

Can one business area be assigned to several company codes? how to do it?

Can one business area be assigned to several company codes?
what are the configurations?
thanks

Dear Humility,
If, I am not wrong, Business Area is assigned to Company Code via Finance (i.e. NO Direct assignment, but can be used across company code). You can assign a business area to an org. object through the account assignment tab.
Business areas are generally company-code independent. You can post to them from any company code. The Business area field shows up as an additional account assignment when posting to an account as long as the field is turned on in configuration. The field can be made a required entry during posting.
If certain company codes are not active in specific business areas, you can use a validation to prevent postings to this business area from the company codes specified.
Important Transactions, related to Business Area Configuration:
OX03     Create Business Area
OMJ7     assign Business Area to Plant / Valuation Area and Division
OVF2     Org Unit: Sales Area - Business Area Determination rule
OVF0     Org Unit: Business Area Determination rule
OVF1     Sales Area - Business Area Determination rule Slsorg/DstCh
Best Regards,
Amit
Note: Some Relevant Links:
[Business Area|http://www.sap-img.com/zf003.htm]
[SAP Business Area|http://www.saptechies.com/configure-the-sap-business-area/]
[Validation of Business Area for Company Code|Re: Validation of Business Area for Company code;

All backend descriptions are already assigned in the system

Hi SRM Gurus ,
While Replicating the Vendor from the backend ' I am getting this Error as +'All backend descriptions are already assigned in the system'+ . I have checked the number Range both in backend and SRM its fine we have replicated lot of Vendors allready without any error .
My analysis :
we have the same vendor Created with diffrenet accounting group with diffrent address in SRM allready . But we are now created new vendor with new accounting group and new address we are trying to Replicate the same in SRM but we are getting that error , Is there any way i can do the sucess full replication with out any error.
The correct answer will be rewarded accordingly .
Thanks & Regards
Ganesh Sagar

We had a problem with number ranges

FI Substitution exit to Business area not possible in the Standard SAP

Hi Experts
I need to derive the business area from the funds centre (local government) in the FI Substitution. This is allowed in the Co Substitution though but it must come ahead of OKB9.
We get the following with loading the Bank Statement FF_5.
Error: (00 298) Formatting error in the field COBL-GSBER ; see next message
How can I get the Business areas in the allowed fields in the FI Substitution?
Please help
Kind regards
Dawn

Dear,
Go to SM30 Enter VWTYGB01click on Maintain
Postion the folloiwng:
Boolean Class = 9
Type = S
Table = BSEG
Field = GSBER
Untick the Column Exclude
Once done please re execute the OBBH, Business Area will be shown there.
Br, Vivek

Interfaces of different SCVs are always assigned to the same proxy object

Hi,
for clean versioning and maintenance of development branches we use different versions of a software component in the ESR. It looks like this:
SC_NAME 1.1 of namespace.com
+- http://namespace.com/project/a
   +- Service Interfaces
      +- Interface1
      +- Interface2
      +- Interface3
SC_NAME 1.2 of namespace.com
+- http://namespace.com/project/a
   +- Service Interfaces
      +- Interface1
      +- Interface2
      +- Interface3
SC_NAME 1.3 of namespace.com
+- http://namespace.com/project/a
   +- Service Interfaces
      +- Interface1
      +- Interface2
      +- Interface3
Here is the problem:
Service interfaces are assigned to proxy objects by using the key type/name/namespace of the repository object (refer SAP note [886682|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/886682]). That means that the software component version of the repository objects is ignored when generating ABAP proxy objects.
Since in our case (see above) all service interfaces have the same type/name/namespace combination, all services interfaces get assigned automatically to the same ABAP proxy object. That makes it impossible to maintain different versions of ABAP proxies for the corresponding service interfaces!
As a workaround we only have two opportunities:
Either we add the version number of the SCV to the namespace (e.g. http://namespace.com/project/a/v1, http://namespace.com/project/a/v2, ...) or we add the version number to the interface name (e.g. Interface1_v1, Interface1_v2, ...) in order to distinguish the service interfaces for the proxy generation.
Both solutions are very ugly in my opinion, since they make our clean versioning with SAP's software component model useless.
Are these solutions the only way to seperate the generated ABAP proxies for each version of a SVC? If yes, then I can hardly believe, that nobody else in the SDN ever mentioned this - in my opinion - huge flaw in the ABAP proxy generation.
Please correct me, if I missed something.
Regards,
Adam
Edited by: Adam Sosnowski on Dec 3, 2009 11:25 AM

Hi Stefan,
thank you for the quick response. It really looks like a bug, since it undermines the versioning with the software component model.
Inside an SAP system, there is only one valid SWCV. So when you decide to use version 1.1 for one system, you cannot use 1.2 for the same system.
I don't exactly know, what you mean with "inside an SAP system". We connect different versions of a client application to different versions of service applications. Newer version may contain an enhanced data model (new fields in the messages, etc.). For that reason, we split the development into branches using different SWCVs in order to handle e.g. change requests for older versions seperately. This approach is a common pattern and it is also the purpose of using software component versions.
Regards,
Adam

Business area not appearing in GR of Subcontracting (Movement type 543)

Dear Gurus
We have created new plant B (and assigend to Company code B) by copying existing plant A (assigned to Company code A). Business area B was defined and assigned to plant B and valuation area. When we do normal GR document business area appears in material document but when we are doing GR for sub contracting (posting key 81) with movement type 543 Business area doesnt appear in the material doc .
In cancellation of Subcontracting material document for plant B (Movement type 544) Business area appears properly . We are unable to analyse the issue. Request your help.
Appreciate your early response
Regards
Arunjit C

Hi,
I assume you know the GL account that should be posted when doing the GR for subcontrating with movement type 543. Try SA38 report RM07CUFA which compares the movement type field status and the GL account field status.
Maybe business area is suppressed in one of the field status and cannot be posted to?
Best regards, Christian

Business area not appearing in Accounting document of 543's materail doc

Hello ,
We have created new plant CN06 (and assigend to Company code CN06) by copying existing plant CN03 (assigned to Company code CN03). Business area CN06 was defined and assigned to plant CN06 and valuation area. When we do normal GR document business area appears in material document but when we are doing GR for sub contracting (posting key 81) with movement type 543 Business area doesnt appear in the material doc .
In cancellation of Subcontracting material document for plant CN06(Movement type 544) Business area appears properly . We are unable to analyse the issue.
We have checked field status through RM07CUFA program , there wn't be any mismatch. Please required your help.
Regards
Mahesh Naik

Hello ,
We have checked
please check the for the sales area have u assigned rule (2 or 1) or not in t-code OVF2.----- Rule assigned is -1
please check business area is assigned to plant & division in t-code OVF0----correct assignment is there
please check assignment of business area to sales area OVF1.--correct assignment is there .
Still we are facing problem.
Regards
Mahesh Naik

ERS and business area

All,
If I have 3 GRs that I want to settle using MRRL.   I settle with a document selection option of 4 (document selection per delivery document/service entry).   This will result in 3 separate invoices.   The first invoice that is created the FI document has the business area. The other 2 invoices have a blank business area.   (The business area in the FI document first line item).
How do I get those other 2 invoices to have business area populated?
Regards,
Sandra

Dear Sandra
When you create invoices in the invoice verification, the business area
is not always copied from the offsetting entries in the vendor item.
According to the note
    39409 Business area in the vendor item
The business area is taken from the material (of your purchase order)
or from the coding block (if you have a purchase order with account
assignment).
The system fills the business area in the vendor item if a business
area can explicitly be determined from the offsetting entries.
If several business areas were used for the offsetting entries, the
field in the vendor item is not filled.
Also please refer to the attached note 186013 for more detail :
To determine the field 'Business area' automatically in the creditor
line, you select the field 'Business area FS' in Transaction OB65
(financial accounting).
It is possible to change the account assignment data and therefore
the business area for the invoice items.
And this might then enable the system to derive the business area
for the vendor item.
Please also review the following attached notes:
    549182 FAQ: Business Area Accounting
    199886 Business area in tax line
Kindest regards,
Erika Szántó

Reg. Business Area Determination

Hi All,
I am getting an error while saving the Sales Order saying "No Businees can be determined" . Please let me know what are all the config. I need to check.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Sen.

Hello,
Maintian the business area in Enterprise structure.
Check whther you have maintian the business are or not, if not please maitain the same.
SPRO-->Enterprise structure --> Defenition -- Financial accounting --> Define business area.
Once you defined the business area, please assign the same :
SPRO-->Enterprise structure --> Assignment --> sales and distribution --> Business area account assignment.
Maintina the rule for business area account assignment, maintina the business area according to the rule you defined.
Assign business area to sales area or Assign business area to plant and division.
Prase

Business area in asset retirement

Hi,
While retiring the asset(t.code F-92), we get an error message
"Account assignment not possible (Asset not assigned to a business area)".
But in asset master(time dep tab), business area is assigned to the asset.
The version is 5.0.
What should be the problem. In FSV and PF BA is optional field.
Can any one help me out in this. Please
Thanks,
Chandru

Hello
Assets are assigned to a single business area in their master record. Every posting to an asset balance sheet account is automatically posted to that business area. The business area for an asset is passed on to all line items connected with the asset. Therefore you do not need to make a manual account assignment for a business area at any point.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/5f/1fac7c4aee11d189740000e8322d00/frameset.htm
Check the info on the link please
Reg
assign points if useful

Error in business area determination in pgi

HI GURUS
i have 1 problem .my clients wants to sale wastes material,thats why i configure all the process(diff distribution channel,order,del,billing type,etc) i create order>delivery correctly but when i am going to post the doc for pgi it showing a red error massage "business area 1002 does not exist".
we never create business area 1002.we use KOLK .In order the system took KOLK but in pgi it showing this error.
but again when i am trying to post system allows me to post and took the KOLK automatically.
I check all the con and all are correct.
what is the reason behind it?how can i solve this problem?
If any one can help me
Thanks
babi

hi
During PGI, the system takes the business area that appears in the
material document and in the accounting document from the entries
recorded under the customizing transaction OMJ7:
In the piece of coding:
Main program     SAPLMATL
Source code of   LMATLF6P
       PERFORM LESEN_T134H   .
       CHECK SY-SUBRC = 0.
       MOVE-CORRESPONDING T134H TO MBEFU. <
     ENDFORM.
regards
ramana

Business area in MIGO

Hi all,
I have following problem, in MIGO I can not activate field BSEG-GSBER (Business area) to be update/manually maintaned by user. It is maintained in SPRO and defines combination plant/division/business area, but it is not visible in MIGO until posted. When posted, it is automaticaly updated by customizing table. I want to add this field in all movement types but it is not possible to maintain it for mov.type 101. My developer tried to add it with BADI but to many changes.
Pls. give some feedback and suggestions.
Thanks in advance,
Anchi

Hi,
The system takes the business area that appears in the material document
and in the accounting document from the entries recorded under the
customizing transaction OMJ7:
In the piece of coding:
Main program     SAPLMATL
Source code of   LMATLF6P
       PERFORM LESEN_T134H   .
       CHECK SY-SUBRC = 0.
       MOVE-CORRESPONDING T134H TO MBEFU. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< HERE
     ENDFORM.
the system completes MBEFU with the settings recorded in table T134H.
So I guess it cannot be influenced manually.........
Maybe you need to write your own code........

Business Area - Material Ledger

Hello,
Analyzing some material ledger documents (type ML) on a determined g/l account (fbl3n), I noticed some postings for only one specific material that Business Area code did not appear.
I guess it´s something related to that material. Where should I investigate ?

Hello,
I have found the root cause of this issue. The material has division 30 on master data(MARA-SPART) .
In SPRO I went to Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Sales and Dist. -> Business Area Account Assignment -> Assign Business Area to Plant And Division and I could notice that this division is not configured to show business area.

No business area is assigned to the material

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for