No camera profiles for D90 and D80 files in ACR 8.3?

Hello,
I recently bought in to Adobe's Creative Cloud and downloaded the latest version of Photoshop and ACR. I love the new process and everything about the new Photoshop, however, when I went to re-edit some older images taken with a Nikon D80 and D90, there were no profiles to be found under the camera calibration tab. What gives? My only option for D90 files is "ACR 4.6" and "ACR 4.4 and 3.6" for the D80 files. Where are all the rest? What am I missing? What's strange is that they are all there in Lightroom. I hate Lightroom, though, and would prefer to continue working within ACR if possible.
Thanks a ton for any insight.

Here is what I have for D90 camera profiles in the Camera\Nikon D90 and Adobe Standard folders under ProgramData with PS-CC and ACR 8.3 installed:
C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Camera\Nikon D90>dir
Volume in drive C is C - Boot
Volume Serial Number is 26BE-4B1F
Directory of C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Camera\Nikon D90
01/11/2014  02:51 PM    <DIR>          .
01/11/2014  02:51 PM    <DIR>          ..
03/18/2013  11:32 AM           112,100 Nikon D90 Camera D2X Mode 1.dcp
03/18/2013  11:32 AM           112,100 Nikon D90 Camera D2X Mode 2.dcp
03/18/2013  11:32 AM           112,100 Nikon D90 Camera D2X Mode 3.dcp
03/18/2013  11:32 AM           112,100 Nikon D90 Camera Landscape.dcp
03/18/2013  11:32 AM           112,098 Nikon D90 Camera Neutral.dcp
03/18/2013  11:32 AM           112,098 Nikon D90 Camera Portrait.dcp
03/18/2013  11:32 AM           112,098 Nikon D90 Camera Standard.dcp
03/18/2013  11:32 AM           112,096 Nikon D90 Camera Vivid.dcp
               8 File(s)        896,790 bytes
C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Adobe Standard>dir *D90*
Volume in drive C is C - Boot
Volume Serial Number is 26BE-4B1F
Directory of C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Adobe Standard
03/18/2013  11:32 AM            55,838 Nikon D90 Adobe Standard.dcp
               1 File(s)         55,838 bytes
I believe these profiles can also come from installing the DNG Converter 8.3, so if the profiles don't seem to exist, then try downloading and installing the DNGC 8.3 from:
http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates

Similar Messages

  • "Embedded" camera profile for .dng file?

    Why does Lightroom 5 show "embedded" as an option for camera profile for .dng files created by my pentax k-30?  I thought that "embedded" profiles did not apply to .dng files?

    A JPG can contain color profile data not just a reference tag containing the name, although other Google results indicate that the APP2 segment is only has 65533 bytes of data and if the profile is too large for that then it is either chunked somehow or written into an XMP segment:
    http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/javax/imageio/metadata/doc-files/jpeg_metadata.ht ml#color
    “If the ColorSpace of the image is based on a non-standard ICC Profile, then that profile is embedded in an APP2 marker segment. If the ColorSpace is not based on a non-standard ICC Profile, but an app2ICC node appears in the metadata, then an APP2 marker segment is written with the appropriate standard profile. Note that the profile must specify an RGB color space, as the file must be JFIF compliant.”
    EXIFtool can extract and embed a profile:
    http://cpanforum.com/threads/2873

  • Current Lightroom / Camera Raw Camera Profile for Sony ILCE-6000 inaccurate: green cast in shadows! Capture one better! Please fix it!

    Hi folks from Adobe!
    Please take note that the current Lightroom / Adobe Camera Raw Camera Profile for the Sony ILCE-6000 is very inaccurate: There is a serious green cast in the shadows!
    Capture One Express for Sony (which is free by the way) renders a lot more correctly!
    Please correct this, since I'd rather buy the coming LR6 because of keeping my established workflow instead of going the Capture One route.
    A good example can be found in the dpreview forum "LR5 A6K shadow pulling, a mess! Adobe LR is broken? "
    Or search for Philp Reeves 3 weeks with the Sony A6000 review "3 Wochen mit der a6000", where he compares it to the Sony A7, using both times Lightroom to push the shadows.
    The Sony A7 is fine where earth looks like brown earth, the A6000 picture looks like grass instead.
    Please fix this! This is a high volume camera frequently bought by enthusiast or as second body for FF photographers. That would be really great!

    I am talking about the two raw files linked in the very last post of page 6 of the Reeves comparison thread, not JPGs or screenshots of unknown manipulation.  In LR they both say f/11 and ISO 100 and have a similar tone, but one is shot at twice the shutter speed as the other.  This side-by-side is using Adobe Factory Defaults for each image where the profile is Adobe Standard, the toning sliders are all 0, tone-curve linear, and the Sharpening and Color NR are 25:
    However, when I look at the camera-embedded JPGs, side-by-side, the 1/80th image on the left is darker than the 1/40th image on the right, as expected given the reported shutter-speed difference:
    And it is indeed the darker image that has more shadow problems, also as expected.
    When I do manipulate the darker (a6000) raw file in LR, I do see that the shadows are greenish when brightened unlike most other cameras which usually show magenta, which is the combination of the blue and red sensors showing more noise because there are half-as-many photosites as compared to the green, so I am seeing what people are complaining about and would expect shadow noise to be purple not green, I'm more concerned that these two example raws aren't actually comparable due to apparent differences in exposure.  It is also odd that the lens listed in LR is different than the lens listed in the filename, so either someone has mistakenly or deliberately renamed the file wrong or someone or something has changed the EXIF parameters that LR is reporting to be the same when they're really not.

  • Where do you put DNG camera profile for light room?

    I just received my Leica M9 and downloaded from chromasoft a camera profile for the M9. it is a .dcp file but I can not find where to use it.
    Adolfo

    Dependent on OS. On Windows vista the usual location is Users\username\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CamerRaw\CameraProfiles .
    Or you can place it directly in the folder where the Adobe profiles are located, usually Users\All Users\Adobe\CamerRaw\CameraProfiles\Camera|Leica M9
    on OSx /Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/CameraProfiles
    The actual profile is used via the calibration setting in the develop module.

  • Could´nt find a camera profile for the M9.

    I have just bought a Leica M9 but I could not find a camera profile for the M9. In the folder "application support/adobe/camera raw/" there is only a profile for the M8. Do I simply not see the profile or is there none. I am using Lightroom 4.4. and Camerea Raw 7.6. on a Mac.

    It isn’t on the list but it produces DNGs with an embedded camera profile so it wouldn’t need any specific support from Adobe, I don’t think, so maybe they didn’t feel the need. 
    If you download the sample DNGs from KenRockwell, you’ll see an Embedded and an Adobe Standard camera profile, which don’t appear to be different because switching between them produces only the tiniest variation in the histogram.  If something equivalent to Adobe Standard is already embedded in the camera’s DNGs that there wouldn’t be any other Camera-this or Camera-that profiles to match, hence only Adobe Standard is supplied.
    http://www.kenrockwell.com/leica/m9/sample-photos-3.htm

  • Where/how to obtain camera profiles for Adobe Camera Raw 7.3?

    Where can you get camera profiles for ACR?  And how do you load them into ACR?  Is the Sony A77 on that list?  Need help on this one.  Thanks.

    Adobe Standard is the only camera profile available for your camera, then, if that’s all you see. 
    Adobe only makes the so-called “camera-match” profiles, with names like Camera Standard, Camera Portrait, Camera Faithful, etc, for Canon and Nikon and a select few others.  I suspect there is a lot of work involved in these and they don’t do it for cameras they see as less popular or less used.
    They wouldn’t be the same as the Camera-Match profiles from Adobe but you can create your own proilfes with an X-Rite 24-patch ColorChecker Classic and the Adobe DNG Profile Editor or using the X-Rite ColorChecker Passport package:
    http://xritephoto.com/ph_product_overview.aspx?ID=1257

  • Camera profiles for Sony A700

    Hi,
    I'm working in CS4 (Mac) and I downloaded the latest camera raw 5.6. I have only the Adobe standard, ACR 4.4 and ACR 3.5 in the Camera Calibration -Camera Profile.
    I don't see special camera profiles for my Sony A700. In tutorials they showed profiles for Canon or Nikon. How can I get the profiles for the A700? Do they exist?
    Thanks a lot
    Claudine

    Hi Claudine,
    At the moment these are the only profiles made by Adobe for the A700. You can build your own profiles (or edit existing profiles) using the free DNG Profile Editor, if you wish. Another solution for a custom profile is the ColorChecker Passport, from X-Rite.
    Eric

  • How does one change the font size for folders and/or file lists in the Bookmarks Library?

    How does one change the font size for folders and/or file lists in the '''Bookmarks''' Library?
    Since the upgrade to version 9.0.1 of Firefox, the Bookmarks feature changes are confusing me. They seem to be confusing themselves as well. The list of bookmarks has changed. The font size is so small that my aging eyes cannot read it without fogging the screen with my breath. Some folders are out of alphabetical order (where I know they were previously good), and some are missing altogether (folders to which I frequently add references).
    As for missing or deranged files or folders, was there something that I should have done or now need to do to recover those after the upgrade (or before)?
    With regard to font size,
    1. there is no “Edit Bookmarks” or like option to edit the list in this version
    2. the “zoom” option in the “view” list of functions is greyed out when in “Show All Bookmarks” window
    3. expanding the browser window has no effect on font size
    4. “Preferences” settings for font size has no effect in that window either, including advanced settings
    5. “Help” offers none that I can find.
    Can any of you Help?!?

    Maybe this extension helps:
    *Theme Font & Size Changer: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/theme-font-size-changer/

  • Bridge does not show dimensions for .PDF and .AI files

    Is there any way to see the dimensions in cm (or inch) for PDF and AI files in Bridge? I'm using Bridge CS5 4.1.0.54 as part of CS5.5 Design Premium, have set the preferences in Bridge to show them, but there are no values in the metadata fields for dimensions in inch/cm. I don't know if this behaviour is normal or if there's something wrong with my installation...
    TIA,
    Matthias

    May be 'dimension' is not the right word/translation. In my german version it says 'Abmessungen (in Zoll)' or 'Abmessungen (in cm)', which should mean something like 'dimension' or 'size'. DIN A4, A5, US Letter, Legal etc. pp. in cm or inch.

  • I keep getting a "missing plugin" for midi and mp3 files.

    I keep getting a "missing plugin" for midi and mp3 files I want to listen to online.  These are Hymn files.  And I get a message telling me I have a missing plugin. Any ideas?

    My husband used to be able to convert ABC files to MIDI files .  This allows sheet music to be played on the computer so as to learn a tune.  We get the Missing Plug in  message.
    I downloaded the Quicktime 7.   I open Quick time, Still get the message.  What is the solution? 
    If you need to look at an example, go to "The Session" website:
    http://thesession.org/tunes/2265
    Thank you,
    Mary

  • Camera profile for Panasonic DMC - LX7 ?

    Hi ! Where could I find camera profile for my new (ld) Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 ?
    Any help welcome !

    You can create your own profile or search the community to see if one has been created for your camera by somebody else.
    See this blog link:
    http://blogs.adobe.com/jkost/tag/the-adobe-lens-profile-creator-tool

  • "Tag Editor" for M4A and M4V Files?

    I got major corruption in my music files, resulting in either 2 extra letters being inserted in the file names just ahead of the period between the file name and the extension, or the entire filename being replaced by 4 random letters. Found some tag editors that will let me repair MP3 files, by pulling tag data out of the file and using it to fix the file names. Does something like that exist for m4a and m4v files?

    No, I'm not suggesting that at all, I was replying to another poster who said they couldn't add artwork to an mp4 at all.
    Your equipment likely has nothing to do with this, I have a dual 4 core 3 Ghz Xeon CPU and I too have a considerable wait sometimes adding artwork to some files.
    mp4 containers can hold either mpeg4/2 or mpeg4/10, (simple mpeg4 and AVC) and each compression type has a whole array of complexity types associated with it, much the same can be said for audio in the mp4 container.
    What I'm saying is that some mp4's will take time to add artwork, some will do it straight away and there are situations where some mp4's won't take artwork. It isn't your system, your hardware or anything you are doing wrong, it's the way it is.

  • Camera profiles for native D80 modes

    Hi to all,
    I would like to know if there are the camera profiles (self-maded with DNG profile editor o similar) which simulate the native color mode of D80 (mode Ia, II and IIIa) because LR and ACR support only new color profiles from EXPEED chip (NATURAL, VIVID, ETC.).

    Here is what I have for D90 camera profiles in the Camera\Nikon D90 and Adobe Standard folders under ProgramData with PS-CC and ACR 8.3 installed:
    C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Camera\Nikon D90>dir
    Volume in drive C is C - Boot
    Volume Serial Number is 26BE-4B1F
    Directory of C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Camera\Nikon D90
    01/11/2014  02:51 PM    <DIR>          .
    01/11/2014  02:51 PM    <DIR>          ..
    03/18/2013  11:32 AM           112,100 Nikon D90 Camera D2X Mode 1.dcp
    03/18/2013  11:32 AM           112,100 Nikon D90 Camera D2X Mode 2.dcp
    03/18/2013  11:32 AM           112,100 Nikon D90 Camera D2X Mode 3.dcp
    03/18/2013  11:32 AM           112,100 Nikon D90 Camera Landscape.dcp
    03/18/2013  11:32 AM           112,098 Nikon D90 Camera Neutral.dcp
    03/18/2013  11:32 AM           112,098 Nikon D90 Camera Portrait.dcp
    03/18/2013  11:32 AM           112,098 Nikon D90 Camera Standard.dcp
    03/18/2013  11:32 AM           112,096 Nikon D90 Camera Vivid.dcp
                   8 File(s)        896,790 bytes
    C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Adobe Standard>dir *D90*
    Volume in drive C is C - Boot
    Volume Serial Number is 26BE-4B1F
    Directory of C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Adobe Standard
    03/18/2013  11:32 AM            55,838 Nikon D90 Adobe Standard.dcp
                   1 File(s)         55,838 bytes
    I believe these profiles can also come from installing the DNG Converter 8.3, so if the profiles don't seem to exist, then try downloading and installing the DNGC 8.3 from:
    http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates

  • How does Adobe make their camera  profiles for ACR and Lightroom?

    I'm not interested in the proprietary algorithms , but I am curious as to the photographic mechanics and hardware tools used by  Adobe to make the various camera profiles as they differ markedly from the ones I make using the DNG Profile Editor.
    My methodology is to set an X-Rite 24 patch Color Checker target, light it evenly with electromic flash (with 0.1 stops from center to corners as mesured with a Sekonic L-758r Meter) and make a series of exposures bracketed in third of a stop increments around the meter reading in case the camera sensitivity differs from the meter's.
    I then process the raw files and convert them to the DNG format, select the best exposure and run it through the DNG Profile editor. My results differ from Adobe's generic profiles for that camera enough that that I don't thin kthe difference can be credited to the difference between a generic profile a specific camera.
    How do the different tools work in the DNG converter? Starting with the Options for "Base Tone Curve"? Is there a document a moderately color geeky person can understand that explains this?
    I thin kthe DNG Profile editor is a great and under usedtool. I wish more people knew about it.
    Thank you for your time and consideration.

    Someone who only eats sausage may not want to know how it's made.  Someone who creates things with food, a chef, a cook, or otherwise is thinking about a career in the food industry, might have a interest in such things.  Someone who is thinking of making sausage will want to know all the details.  Someone who is concerned with the public safety might want to know how sasauge is made.
    It would be nice for a sausage maker to give some hints about the process as compared to what each of us can do with the DNG Profile Editor and to the original poster's question, why are our profiles different from Adobe's?
    It is my experience that when I create a profile with the DNG Profile Editor, and then compute the color error for each of the 24 color patches of a CC24, using a program like Imatest, some colors are quite a bit off and some are very close, and the colors that are off, are not the same ones that are off when I compute the color error using one of the Adobe Standard or Camera Standard profiles.
    Is Adobe using more detailed and sophisticated color targets with hundreds of different colors, or if not, do the tools provide more feedback and allow more manual manipulation of the profile and so the differences are due to their judgement about which colors to make "right" and which ones to let have more error associated with them, that can be manipulated by hand instead of merely letting the DNG Profile Editor apparently distribute the error amongst the various colors with some sort of even-handed calculation.
    For example it is easy to imagine that someone tweaking a profile by hand with a live readout of the error of each of the colors plus an overall composite error, might put more emphasis on skin tones being right if they have a background in people photography, or more emphasis on bright colors being right if their experience is in textiles and the current trend in the US is bright colors--and a different emphasis when the trend is muted colors so there is cultrual bias and life-experience coloring a "standard" profile.
    In other words, how much of the difference between Adobe and our profiles are due to Adobe having different or better science, and how much of it is due to Adobe have different or better "artists" who decide what colors to make correct compared to others.

  • Is there a camera profile for Nikon D80 available for Photoshop/Lightroom CC

    I am new to Lightroom and Photoshop. After watching a few YouTube instructional video's for Lighroom I looked for my Lens (Nikon 18-135 Zoom) but could not see one. One video suggested looking in Photoshop, there I can find the lens but not my camera. Several video's talk about downloading profiles from the internet, is there a place to do this for either?
    Is a camera profile even used in Lightroom ?

    Thanks, this workaround works:
    I copied appropriate lens profile from (the .lcp file)
    /Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/LensProfiles/1.0
    to:
    /Users/<my username>/Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/LensProfiles

Maybe you are looking for