No conditions determined (no authorization for input)

Hi Friends,
I am trying to create a PO but i am getting a error message that "No conditions determined (no authorization for input)" and I am unable to view the conditions tab.
Can anyone please guide how do I rectify the error.
Regards,
Wasim.

Hi,
When I run the t-code SU53 it says "The last authorization check was successful" But the problem still exists.
Regards,
Wasim,

Similar Messages

No Conditions Determined (NoAuthorization for Input)

Hi, I'm new in SAP, can anybody please help me with this error messages happened in MIGO transaction?
"No Conditions Determined (No Authorization for Input) - Message No.: 06235
Diagnosis:
Your user master record does not include authorization to perform this function or display certain data.
Procedure:
Contact your system administrator.
Your function authorization does not cover the entry of conditions.
Function authorizations may be maintained or displayed by authorized persons in Customizing."
The user is doing MIGO with Article that has a Material Type: Packaging. The document won't post due to said error messages.
I've already checked the user authorization, everything is ok.
Please advise.
Thanks.

Hi,
You can check with your system administrator (basis admin) to check whether correct profile has been authorized for your user name.
Regards

Abort Could not determine a value for variable 0DAT from the authorizations

Hi All,
I encountered an error '/ Abort Could not determine a value for variable 0DAT from the authorizations\' when executing my query on a multiprovider in BW 3.5.
Can anyone help me in finding a solutionn to this issue.
Thanks,
Kartik.

Hi Kartik,
I am sorry as that note is for NW2004s. Please check if 0DAT variable installed from a business content? if not then I think thats the cause of the problem.
Hope this helps,
Bye...

How to give authorization for create and change particular Condition Type

Hi...
In my requirement is , Only one user can be authorized to create and change a particular condition type 'ZABC' in vk11 and vk12 .
For remaining condition type can be used as in normal .
How to do this ? How to give authorization for a particular user for particular condition type ?
Plz guide me ..
Thanks in advance .
Deepa .

Hi Deepa ,
u can check A.Object V_KOND_VEA, in user profile u can assign condition type or tables.
have a word with ur basis guy , so he can help u in better way.
aand also ref FM SD_COND_AUTH_CHECK
Regards
Prabhu

Price condition determination for purchasing contract(ME31K)

Hi Experts,
     It is possible to apply price condition determination in purchasng contract(ME31K)? We had maintain the price condition for below keys: WBS/Material number and this condition record work well in purchase order. But I hope that this condition record is applied in pruchasing contract when we create contract by ME31K. Plz kindly give me a suggestion.
So I want to check the condition dtermination is whether fullfil my requirement. If we can not use the price condition determination to get the net price, then we only go for user-exit to get it.
Thank you very much in advance.

>
Gangrong Chen wrote:
> Hi Experts,
>
>      It is possible to apply price condition determination in purchasng contract(ME31K)? We had maintain the price condition for below keys: WBS/Material number and this condition record work well in purchase order. But I hope that this condition record is applied in pruchasing contract when we create contract by ME31K. Plz kindly give me a suggestion.
>
> So I want to check the condition dtermination is whether fullfil my requirement. If we can not use the price condition determination to get the net price, then we only go for user-exit to get it.
>
> Thank you very much in advance.
Why not, in me31k, click on condition button on toolbar for item conditions and for header conditions, click on menu bar path HEADER>CONDITIONS and maintain your conditions accordingly.

BAPI to get all user lists for input object,authorizations, and profiles

Hi Experts,
BAPI to get all user lists for input specific object, authorizations, profiles and values?
Any useful answer will be rewarded with suitable points.
Thanks,
Rohan

Hi
use the fun module/Bapi's
BAPI_USER_GET_DETAIL
BAPI_USER_LOCPROFILES_ASSIGN
BAPI_USER_LOCPROFILES_DELETE
BAPI_USER_LOCPROFILES_READ
BAPI_USER_PROFILES_ASSIGN
BAPI_USER_PROFILES_DELETE
SUSR_BAPI_USER_PROFILES_ASSIGN
SUSR_BAPI_USER_PROFILES_DELETE
also you can use the tables UST12 for user based authorizations
AGR_USERS -roles assignment for users
AGR_PROF - Profile data for roles
AGR_DEFINE - Auth Profiles for users
See the AGR_* and US* tables further
Reward points if useful
Regards
Anji
Message was edited by:
Anji Reddy Vangala

Authorization Variables ready for input

I have a problem whit a variable, is an authorization variable and ready for input, but when i use this variable and clean the input box this variable don't works as an authorization variable...
I hope that this variable return all the values where the user has authorization but it return ALL values and not only where the user is authorized...
How can I make that a blank variable gives me all the values the user is authorized to see?
Hope someone can help me!
Best regards
Enrique

Steps that you may be missing:
1. Make the info object authorization relevent. You make this setting in info object maintenance screen -RSA1 .
2. Create a authorization objects in RSSM for this object.
3. Maintain values for this object in PFCG for the role that you assign to the users.
After that, run the query.
Ravi Thothadri

Missing authorization for processing condition

Hi All,
We are having a problem with our pricing procedure zxxx.
we created a pricing procedure and connect it to a java formula.
this formula return an error message :
" Missing authorization for processing condition zxxx "
in debug we see that this message come from the formula and not some kind of authorization check.
( even a user with "sap all" get this message ).
does any one know how to solve this?
or:
does any one know how to debug the java formula ?
thanks,
Lilach.

Hi,
Check with your basis consultant whether the authorization is change ?
Regards,
Chetan.

Abort Couldn't determine the value for 0P-KEYD2 from Authorizations

Hi All,
When attempting to open a query, i'm encoutered with an error like "Abort Could not determine a value for variable 0P_KEYD2 from the authorisations".
Last month it was working fine, and working fine in Quality enviroment also.
If anyone come across such situation or any ideas, Please help me out in this regard.
Awaiting to see replies for this.
Regards,
PRK.

Dear PRK,
I'm facing exactly the the same problem - which solution did you finally find.
Regards,
Axel

What's the best way to do authorization for my app?

The authorization situation is somewhat complicated for my app.
Each component of the app is authorized based on not only the user, but also the page number, the value of at least one P0_ITEM.
From what I've seen so far, there are two different options of setting the authorization for the component:
1. Set its Condition
2. Set its Security Authorization Scheme
Here is my understanding for each (from my limited experience with APEX):
1. Set its Condition
+ Can pass in parameters such as :APP_USER, page numebr, P0_ITEM. So I can just create one function that does all the authorization
- Have to combine the SQL query with the component's non-authorization display conditions, if any.
2. Set its Security Authorization Scheme
+ By name, it seems like it should be used for authorization
- Cannot take in parameters relating to the page, such as the page number --> therefore I will need to create many different schemes, for all the different pages.
#2 will end up with a long list of schemes (each with its own SQL queries) for different pages, which doesn't seem as efficient as #1 with far fewer SQL queries and just take in parameters.
Which one should I pick?
Thanks!

953006 wrote:
Thanks fac586 for the detailed response, and also everyone else who replied. You guys are very helpful and respond promptly. And we'd appreciate it if you changed "953006" into a real handle promptly.
Andre mentioned using conditions:
The way I work around this is to have two functions, one which is used at the page level as a normal authorization scheme and one which can be passed variables which is called as a Condition and the name of the item is one of the variables, in effect giving it "self awareness".But fac586 said:
You can't pass "parameters" to authorization schemes. Use application items, APEX collections or application contexts to set current context before the authorization scheme is evaluated, and access these values in the functions.Does this mean, fac586, that we can avoid conditions altogether? No, it means that I prefer to use Authorization Schemes to control access to resources based on user privileges and security, and Conditions to control rendering and processing for functional reasons. Using the approach described above I have found it possible to maintain this separation.
Say if a page has two buttons, Button_A and Button_B. Button_A has a set of requirements for displaying and Button_B has its own set of requirements (some of which are shared with Button_A). So far, the only way that I can see of using pure authorization is to write 2 different authorization schemes, and set the authorization schemes for the two buttons respectively.What's the problem with that? Consider a more concrete example using a standard APEX report/form pattern for customer maintenance. Page 6 contains the report, and page 7 is the maintenance form with P7_CREATE and P7_SAVE buttons. Only users entitled to create new customers should have access to P7_CREATE, and only users able to edit customers access to P7_SAVE. This would be controlled by the CREATE_CUSTOMER and EDIT_CUSTOMER authorization schemes respectively. Functionally, conditions are used to show P7_CREATE if the P7_CUSTOMER_ID is null, and P7_SAVE if it's not null. We don't mix non-functional security considerations with functional requirements.
The CREATE_CUSTOMER and EDIT_CUSTOMER authorization schemes are of type PL/SQL Function Returning Boolean. These are implemented using package functions. Exactly how a user has create/edit customer privilege is determined in the package. Determinants that are shared by multiple schemes can be combined at this level. These implementations can be changed as necessary without requiring changes to the application.
The authorization schemes are reusable across pages and components. On page 6, CREATE_CUSTOMER can be used on the "Create New Customer..." button; EDIT_CUSTOMER on the report column containing the "Edit" links.
Each component of the app is authorized based on not only the user, but also the page number, the value of at least one P0_ITEM. So I guess this goes back to my original concern with Authorizations:
[Using purely authorizations] will end up with a long list of schemes (each with its own SQL queries) for different pages [and page items] ....
Re: VPD policies. Note that in the example above there's no need for the authorization schemes to "know" which pages/items are being evaluated. The P7_SAVE button and the page 6 link column are involved with the EDIT_CUSTOMER operation, so that authorization scheme is applied to them.

Disabling the Qty field for Input for Sub items in Sales Order and Delivery

Hi..
I have a requirement, where by we need to disable the qty field vbap-kwmeng for input for sub items of the BOM.
I am planning to use the user exit USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION...in the include MV45AFZZ for sales orders.
But i need to disable the input only after the BOM Explosion and item category determination in the sales order.
Can i Use the same exit ?? what additional conditions i need to take into account.
also we need to disable the delivery quantity field also for the sub items of this sales bom.
I see that this User exit is not available in delivery procesing. How to acheive the required functionality in the delivery processing...
your advice is much appreciated in this matter.
Regards
Srini

hi,
Route is determined
1.Country of Departure & Departure Zone taken from Shipping Point
2.Country of Destination & receiving Zone from Ship to party
3.Shipping condition from CMR
4.Transportation Group from MMR
5.Weight Group which is optional.
Check the above.
Route is determined in delivery.
ASHA

Authorization for a custom programme

How to do Authorization for Custom Transactions?
Can we directly put Authorization Object name in SE93?
What should be the default values? How can we authorize - User Input values in Program T-Code?
How to do Authorization for Custom Programs?
     This is usually done by incuding:
     AT SELECTION-SCREEN .
     AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'F_RE_TRANS' ID1 Authorization field1      FIELD1 Authorization field value1
                                   ID2 Authorization field2      FIELD2 Authorization field value2
      IF sy-subrc = 4.
              Display No Authorization error
     ENDIF.
If we donot want to pass the Authorization field - Activity Code ACTVT as Display/Change/Create etc., what should be passed in ACTVT, can we leave it ' ' ?
How to do Authorization for Table Maintainance Transactions?
Can we directly put Authorization Object name in SE11 Table Maintainance Generator?
If how to determine Authorization Group?
What should be the default values?
How can we authorize - User Input values in Table maintainance T-Code?
Can we use transaction SU22? If so how?

Hi Friend,
SU21- for creating authorization object
SU20 - for creating authorization field and assign with authorization object
SU22 - maintain authorization agianst transactions
Execute these transactions or see any standard object you will understand everything.
Regards
Krishnendu

Problem with Authorization for Planning folder

Hi an having a problem with providing authorization for a planning folder
i am getting the following error when i test it with test user
Error while calling up RFC
Message no. UPC202
Diagnosis
You have selected a function, to execute this the system must set up an RFC connection to another SAP System. However, setting up this connection was not successful. The following internal error message was generated:
"You do not have authorization for InfoCube ZT_MR_T "
Procedure
Inform the system administrator.
we are not pulling the data from any other server, all the data is on the sif any one has faced the same issue let me know.
Regards,
Abraham

Calling Thru Trans code: BPS0 in ECC 6
getting this error:
Error while calling up RFC
Message No. UPC202
Diagnosis
You have selected a function, to execute this the system must set up an RFC connection to another SAP System. However, setting up this connection was not successful. The following internal error message was generated:
"An error occurred during the receipt of a complex parameter."
after i check in bw trans code:st22
Following this error message:
Category                   Internal Kernel Error
Runtime Errors         PARAMETER_CONVERSION_ERROR
Application Component BC-MID-RFC
Short text
    An error occurred during the receipt of a complex parameter.
What happened?
    During a remote function call, an error occurred while converting
    a complex parameter.
What can you do?
    Note which actions and input led to the error.
    For further help in handling the problem, contact your SAP administrator
    You can use the ABAP dump analysis transaction ST22 to view and manage
    termination messages, in particular for long term reference.
Error analysis
    An error occurred during the conversion of a complex parameter.

BW report authorization for restrict cost center

dear all,
i have problem on BW report authorization for restrict cost center.....when i execute the query, after selection screen, appear error message 'you cannot change zv_cctr for characteristic 0COSTCENTER during query'.
note : zv_cctr is variable restriction for costcenter, type processing = customer exit.
below the customer exit :
WHEN 'ZV_CCTR'.
    IF i_step = 2.
      DATA : gt_mstuidvscc TYPE TABLE OF ztbw_mstuidvscc,
             gs_mstuidvscc TYPE ztbw_mstuidvscc,
             wa_final2(10) TYPE c.
      SELECT * FROM ztbw_mstuidvscc INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE gt_mstuidvscc
        WHERE userid = 'sy-uname'.
      LOOP AT gt_mstuidvscc INTO gs_mstuidvscc.
        wa_final2 = gs_mstuidvscc-kostl.
        l_s_range-opt = 'EQ'.
        l_s_range-high = wa_final2.
        APPEND l_s_range TO e_t_range.
      ENDLOOP.
    ENDIF.
Regards,
Tony

i defined variable as ready for input and mandatory.
regards,
Tony

Cannot determine a value for an exit variable in the Formula fn w/p empty

Hi All,
We have an exit variable Z_EX_AR_VAR, the would read a hierarchy node input variable (Z_HN_AREA), which is furthur based on a hierarchy input variable (Z_HR_AREA), and wouuld return the first leaf of it.
We have implemented a input ready query based on this exit variable and it is getting the first node and is input ready and saves the data to the database.
It works well in the query when we have filtered the characteristic with the hier and hier node and the exit variables.
We need to use the same value to be used in the Fox function.
As per the requirement, the Fox function has to process the zero (empty) records.
So, we have customized formula function to process emptry records.
And in the function of type formula function that processes empty records, we have used the following statement.
DATA AR type ZAREA.
AR = VARI ( Z_HN_AREA, HIENM=Z_HR_AREA, 1).
We are getting the following error message:
Cannot determine a value for the variable Z_HN_AREA.
Planning function ended with errors.
What is that we are doing wrong here. Is it with the 'Process Empty Records' function that cannot read the variable.
How come this variable is working in the query and it is not working in the FOX.
We have done the variable to variable binding in the WAD also. Still the same problem.
Any ideas? Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
- Shashi
Thanks in '

Hi All,
Michael Wolf from SAP confirmed that we cannot use VARiable read functions in the customized Formula function that processes the zero (empty records) as he spoke to SAP AG about the issue.
Hence we have made a work around by creating a valid record using a dummy key figure in the Custom Formula function that processes empty records so that in the next step, the regular Formula function would get executed, where we could access the variable values by using VARV, VARI functions.
Thanks,
- Shashi

No conditions determined (no authorization for input)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for