No derivation analysis available at FMDERIVE

Hello ...
I've got some 'strange' problem here.
When I'm tracing an operation, with FMDERIVE tool I couldn't see the "display log" well.
I mean, I already read [666322|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/666322] note. But, in my others custommers this trace works fine, and I saw the asignment info (I mean the trace info between FMDERIVE rules).
Look, I attach one image for example:
http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/8462/emptyrules.jpg
No derivation analysis available
Hmm... just now, before I post this messege I read the note [1231905|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1231905], but I haven't activated the US Federal Government function, so... no prerequisites for this note here.
System Specifications:
Component Version: SAP ECC 6.0
EA-PS: 603
If u need more info, please tell me.
Awaiting your comments, thank you very much for your time and help.
Regards,
Osvaldo.

Hehehe, Thanks very much for replay Aleksey.
I drowned in a glass of water.
I missed the step, when u have to assign the company code in FMDERIVE.
Lol... This happens to me for working long hours as a zombie FM.
Thanks again!
Regards,
Osvaldo.

Similar Messages

  • How to get customised reports through Flexible Analysis available in PMIS

    Dear Sir,
    Please guide us how to get customised reports through Flexible Analysis available in PMIS.
    Thanks & Regards,
    PM Team

    [Sap Help|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/c1/375e9c449a11d188fe0000e8322f96/frameset.htm].
    Regards
    Narasimhan

  • Service Master Derivation in SAP FM (FMDERIVE)

    HI,
    Can the service master & material group fields be added in FMDERIVE?
    Request to please let me know.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ajay

    Hi Ajay,
    I think note 881202 answers your question:
    881202 FM derivation tool: Derivation of foreign acct assignments
    Symptom
    Using the Funds Management (FM) derivation tool (transaction FMDERIVE),
    you want to derive account assignments that are not Funds Management
    account assignments.
    For example, you want to use a derivation rule to derive the G/L
    account, the cost center, or the business area.  However, the affected
    account assignments are not transferred to the document.
    Other terms
    FMDERIVE
    Reason and Prerequisites
    The Funds Management derivation tool can only be used to derive Funds
    Management account assignments.  These include:
        o  Commitment item
        o  Funds center
        o  Funds
        o  Grant
        o  Functional area
        o  Funded program.
    Within the derivation strategy, you can also use any other account
    assignments that are in the document to be posted but only FM account
    assignments can be transferred.
    Solution
    Account assignments that do not belong to FM cannot be changed by the FM
    derivation tool.  Otherwise, there could be major problems in other
    applications (FI, CO, and so on).
    Depending on the affected applications, two similar methods are possibly
    available (validation and substitution, or similar).
    Best Regards,
    Mateus Grings

  • FMDERIVE: adding a new MM source field

    Hi, I'd would to know how to add the field KNTTP (Account assignement category) in a derivation rule.
    So far, I've done this steps:
    1) Adding the field in the structure FMDERIVE inside de APPEND "AFMDERIVE"
    2) Activating the user exit EXIT_SAPLFMDT_002
    *--- Copy additional fields from the structure COBL.
    MOVE-CORRESPONDING i_cobl TO c_fmderive.
    *--- Copy additional fields from the structure COBL_AD
    MOVE-CORRESPONDING i_cobl_ad TO c_fmderive.
    3) Creating the new derivation rule in transaction FMDERIVE, like this:
    SOURCE FIELDS: KNTTP (Account assignment category) & PLANT (Plant)
    TARGET FIELDS: FUND_CENTER (Funds Center)
    CONDITIONS: FM_AREA = XXXX & COMPANY_CODE = 1000 & KNTTP = A
    Unchecked all in Attributes tab.
    RULE VALUES = For example: PLANT = 1000 & KNTTP = A ==> FUND_CENTER = A
                                                      PLANT = 1000 & KNTTP = K ==> FUND_CENTER = Z
    SAVE
    But when I'm creating a purchase requisition (ME51N) and I choose the plant 1000 and the account assignment category A, the derivation is not working.
    We have made a debugging and we've realised that the structure i_cobl doesn't have the field KNTTP, so the exit always move to a blank space in field KNTTP.
    Anybody can help me? Is there a way to add fields in the i_cobl structure?? Should I use another User exit because the field belongs to MM??
    If anybody have any other idea, I will be glad to read it!!
    Thanks in advance!
    Lorena

    Hi, there is a way of using KNTTP in derivation (this also applies to other fields not available in COBL/COBL_AD), not sure if it is a recommended approach because it requires reading the values from memory, it does work though.
    Read the value of KNTTP from memory and assign it to C_FMDERIVE in EXIT_SAPLFMDT_002, include ZXFMDTU02. then it is available in derivation as source field, provided that you have added it to the structure. See code below:
    DATA: lv_field(100) TYPE c.
    FIELD-SYMBOLS: <ekpo> TYPE ekpo.
    CONCATENATE '(SAPLMEPO)' 'EKPO' INTO lv_field.
    ASSIGN (lv_field) TO <ekpo>.
    IF sy-subrc = 0.
       c_fmderive-usertemp1 = <ekpo>-knttp.
    ENDIF.

  • Prob in FM Derivation

    Good day to all,
    I have an interesting issue that is we are using derivation rule like fund center and commitment item from Cost center and Cost element respectively.
    Example :
    1.     104700001(Cost Center)/Cost element (401001)  To Fund Center(104700001                                           Commitment Item ( 401001)
    2.     104700002(Cost Center)/Cost element (401002)  To Fund Center(104700002                                               Commitment Item ( 401002)
    At the time of posting expenses  initially Cost Element 401001 and Cost center 104700001 get debited and Fund Management account assignment derived correctly i.e. Fund Center (104700001) Commitment Item ( 401001)
    But after simulation FI document user realized that cost center is wrong, then changed cost center from 104700001 to 104700002 but there was no changes in Fund Management account assignment i.e Fund center where it is wrong.
    Could some advise us how to come out from this. We are looking solution like when ever changes in controlling cost object  cost center after derived FM account assignment system should replace to correct fund center and Commitment Item based on derivation  we maintained in FMDERIVE.
    Thanks & Regards,
    YK

    Dear YK,
    Unfortunately what you have described is the standard behaviour.
    Please check the following SAP consulting note that explains this in detail and the workarounds available:
    658163    Acct assignmnt change: Determinatn of new FM acct assignmnt
    I believe that this answer your inquiry.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa Barth.

  • Allocated ATP derivation for bulk loads and stealing

    Gurus,
    We are designing a solution where the requirement is to derive ATP for more than a million items every day. For around a 250,000 items, we need to know the maximum quantity available for an item, org, demand class (including Stealing).
    We need to know the availability for future dates (like Horizontal plan) which includes stealing. We are using Allocated ATP and we are in R12.2.3.
    Questions:
    1) As per the document (Doc ID 150908.1) ATP API Description R12 (ATP API MRP_ATP_PUB.Call_ATP) the API can be used derive multiple items in a single call. Is there a limit on the number of items can be passed in a single call?
    2) Can we derive ATP values including stealing in a single call? If so, which of the output record type can be referred to ATP_Rec_Typ, ATP_Period_Typ and ATP_Supply_Demand_Typ?
    3) Can we derive future availability of items in a single call? We saw the output of X_ATP_PERIOD which seem to give the horizontal plan. Can we get the availability with stealing in horizontal plan in a single ATP call itself?
    4) If API is not the suitable approach, can you please let us know the table/logic that can be used for derivation?
    Appreciate your help.
    Thanks,
    Ram.

    889367 wrote:
    What's the benefit of including "IF  :NEW.col1  IS NULL" statement? If I leave it out and someone tries to insert a value not using the trigger it changes the value for me. I can see that being good and bad, but it keeps them from not using the sequence.
    The benefit is that it allows you to manually assign the column value if you want to. Whether that is a 'benefit' for your use case or not is for you to decide.
    But I'm trying to decide when and if I should use this. I wouldn't consider it but we've got Informatica developers that insist on writing dynamic sql functions to pull values for sequences to use in inserts because they can't reference the nextval in the their workflows.
    Don't use Informatica to do something that can be done using Oracle. The strength and utility of an ETL tool is in doing things that the database either can NOT do or cannot do efficiently: for example pulling data from multiple databases and flat files for insert into a target database. The goal being to get ALL of the data into the target database as quickly and efficiently as possible. Then you can apply the full power of the target database to ALL of the data.

  • Replicating COPA derivation rules in BI

    Hi All,
    We have a requirement where we are creating an extractor and COPA derivation rules available in ECC needs to be replicated in BI. My doubts are-
    1. Could this be directly achieved in BI, if yes then how would we maintain sync between the ECC derivation rules and the replicated ones in BI. If there is some update on these rules, how would the respective BI rules get updated?
    2.Should this be handled during extraction in ECC itself. If yes, what is the best approach for this?
    any pointers catering to the above questions and anything related to mapping derivation rules in BI would be a great help.
    Thanks in advance for your help and time.
    Regards,
    Bansi.

    Hi AMK,
    As a protocol that is followed on this site, please do provide points in case the replies helped, this helps in motivating the people to keep posting for the queries and also helps in keeping the spirits of the team high.
    Regards
    Ashish

  • BAPI or fm for transaction FMDERIVER

    hi all
    is there any BAPI or fm which uploads derivation rules for tcode FMDERIVER?
    Edited by: PREMA PREMA on Oct 19, 2010 2:33 PM

    Hi,
    Function Modules:
    FM2BL_DERIVATION_TEST           =    FM2BL - Derivation Test
    FM2BL_EXECUTE_DERIVATION    =   Characteristic derivation
    FM2BL_GET_DERIVATION_FIELDS =   Get Sender/Receiver fields for Derivation
    FM_ACCOUNT_DERIVE       =       FM Account Derive
    FM_CHECK_ASSIGNMENT_RULES   =   Check FM Assignment using Derivation Tool
    FM_FMDERIVE_CALL_CUSTOMER_EXIT CALL FMDERIVE  USER-EXIT
    FM_FMDERIVE_FILL_CUSTOMER_EXIT Copy additional fields from COBL and COBL_AD into FMDERIVE
    FM_GET_INSTANCE_BADI_FMDERIVE  Initilize BADI_FMDERIVE
    FM_STRATEGY_FROM_BADI          Get Strategy Environment from BADI
    FM_STRATEGY_FROM_COMP_CODE     Get Strategy ID assigned to Company Code
    FM_STRATEGY_SAP_EXIST          Get Strategy ID assigned to Company Code
    PSM_AUTH_CHECK_DRULE           Authorization check: F_PSM_DRUL
    PSM_AUTH_CHECK_DSTR            Authorization check: F_PSM_DRUL

  • Error occurred in derivation rule in SAP

    Hi All
    i am trying to post the document as well to create the new PR i am getting the below error messge as
    'Error occurred in derivation rule. See long text
    Message no. K/101
    Diagnosis
    : Fund From Commitment Item
    No entry in a derivation rule was found for the specified source fields.
    The derivation rule was set up so that an error message appears when this happens.
    The required derivation rule entry would need the following source fields:
    Commitment Item
    350801
    Procedure
    Create an entry in a derivation rule for these source field values. Make sure that entries exist for all the valid source field values. If the derivation should not always be carried out, you can also define a derivation rule so that no error message appears if a derivation rule entry does not exist.

    Hi Krishguna,
    You need to check your derivation rule, T. Code: FMDERIVE for Fund then activate the trace, this will help you why fund is not deriving from commitment item, or tell us the detail of derivation for fund you have set.
    Thanks
    Javed

  • FM DERIVER Custom field in Derivation Rule

    Hi Experts,
    I want to have a custom field while defining Derivation Rule in TCODE FMDERIVE, the field I require is Storage Location LGORT. Inorder to achieve this I have used Customer Include in structure FMDERIVE and inserted field LGORT.
    Now the problem is that when I am defining my custom Derivation Rule using custom field Storage Location, the rule is not determined.
    Could u please help me in this.
    Thanks n Regards
    Rohit

    Hi
    Go to
    Spro -PSFM-FMG-Master Data-Allocation to account assignment from other components -select derivation steps
    here u selct 3 option
    cost center to commitment-item/fund ctr/fund function
    then define account assignment derivation
    here u define Derivation rule whcihever u define
    here u find tables and field whichever u find
    if nay query, revert back
    Regards
    Roobal

  • Price Determination Analysis Not Saved

    Price determination analysis is not saved when a document is saved in CRM. Price details are displayed, but the "Accesses" button yields the "No pricing analysis available" message unless the price update button is pressed. This is not possible when a document is complete. Questions about how a price condition was chosen are unanswerable. Is there a way to save the pricing analysis every time a document is saved?

    Hi
    When a document is saved and you try to display the conditions , the data is fetched directly from database . At this point of time there is no condition access made and that is the reasn why you dont see pricing analysis available.
    The pricing analysis data is determined runtime and not stored when the document is saved .
    When you press update button , then Repricing is triggered and you will see pricing analysis when you click "Access button".
    Regards
    Me

  • Bid Analyses

    Hi all,
    Need help regading bid analysis..
    Maintained attributes at header and item levels..
    Maintained the weighting % for the header attributes and item attributes..
    Maintained Parameter weightage at item level...
    But with all the above is there any standard analyses available with EBP..(Bcoz i can see the analyses TAB on the BID for comparisons)
    But when i click on the tab there is nothing showing up...
    is there any setup that has to be done...
    Regards
    Sunny

    Hi Vadim,
    With some technical assistance figured out that there were no Javascript errors on the page... and we also debugged from the web GUI.. and could not really figure out where the problem is..
    The Html template shows up but it is all blank..
    so could republishing the service be a remedy..
    or could you gimme some more ideas to solve this problem..
    Regards
    Sunny

  • Error while running analysis

    Hi,
    I want to use reports of standard analysis available in SD module, but when I try to run analysis such as MCTA, MCTC, MCTE etc.system shows messege 'No Data exist for chosen selection'
    What needs to do to get the data in to analysis.

    In material master -> Sales Org.2 View, Material static group should be maintained. Also in customer master->Sales Area Data, Customer static group should be maintained. Then you will get the data in MCTA reports.
    -Alpesh

  • Funds Mangement - Derivation of Tolerence profiles

    Hi
    I have created a  tolerence profile, which has to give only 'information' even after 100 % of budget usage.
    I have written a derivation rule for a particular CI pointing to this profile.
    Assigned the Tolerence profile derivation strategy to FM area and AVC ledger ( 9I) I am using only CB.
    My standard profile is to throw an error when budget exceeds 100%.
    When i post an entry (through FB60) for the above commitment item  for which i have written derivation of tolerence profile. System not overriding my standard profile. Did i miss any thing ?"
    Thanks in advance
    Chris

    Hi Chris,
    Check in your strategy, if you selected the 'overwrite with a new value' flag for the tolerance profile (the ddefault is no). Also, keep in mind, that you can always put a trace on this derivation exactly as for FMDERIVE.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Replacing FMDERIVE/GMDERIVE with BRFPlus

    I currently see a great deal of stress and anguish around managing derivation rules etc for FMDERIVE and GMDERIVE.
    I understand it is possible to call a function module from FMDERIVE - so it should be [technically] possible to link FMDERIVE to BRFPlus.
    Does anyone have any experience with this?
    My particular pain points are:
    managing WIPi.e. changes from different streams - that have to go live independently
    testing and regression testing
    are there any tools for this?
    I would prefer to maintain a test dataset and re-run tests after changes
    transporting FMDERIVE/GMDERIVE rules as a delta -
    it seems this is not possible. It's all or nothing
    delta has to be applied to target system manually
    Any direction you might provide would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Derek

    Derek,
    I do not have an expertise in the business domain but I have helped connect DSM/BRFplus mayn times. I suggest we have a call to discuss the topic.
    Concerning your pain points:
    With DSM you can change rule content on a separate system and decouple from normal transport routes and timelines (with all the limitations). It also depends on the rule design how strictly you want to separate the pieces of content. DSM further provides you a tool for administration and execution of test cases as well as a deployment workflow. In combination you can make sure that any changes is automatically tested before reaching the productive systems. With DSM you can even test on the productive system before you deploy there.
    Carsten

Maybe you are looking for