No entries in trace file - ST01

Hello gurus,
I'm trying to analyze an authorization problem so I created a test scenario to understand how authorization trace works.
For this test scenario, I'm trying to enter SE38 with a user that has no authorizations and getting "no authorization" error.
I activated the system trace from ST01 with authorization check setting, got the error and then deactivated the trace. But when I try to analyze, there are no records about the authorization error I'm getting.
Is my test scenario correct? If yes, why can't I see the missing authorization from the trace?
Thank you for your input.
Kind regards,
Gökhan

Hai,
Check the parameters controlling the Traces:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/5a/ace282ca0211d194b500a0c94260a5/frameset.htm
You might have configured less space for writing trace files at file system level/hard disc.
Regards,
Yoganand.V

Similar Messages

Trace File -ST01

In QAS and PRD I am gettign an excellent trace file on ST01, But on thePRD system I am not getting any..THe file itself is not created.. I am on 46c
Thanks

Specified will overide default.
What this means is that rstr/max_diskspace has a deault value of 16 384 000, if the current value of parameter rstr/max_diskspace is 0 then thats the value that the system will take...
You can either delete the parameter from your profile (which will return this to the default) or increase the value to more than 0 to give the trace some space to grow.
Regards
Juan

EJB Exceptions generate entry in trace file

Every exception I throw an exception from an EJB generates a stack trace in the oracle trace file. These are business rule errors like "Withdrawal Denied: Insuffient Funds". Can I turn this off? The J2EE spec says that the container should notify when an EJBException is throw to the container. How do I get the container to ignore my custom exception? My exception class is just derived from RemoteException like in the below Oracle example.
package employee;
public class EmpException extends RemoteException
public EmpException(String msg)
super(msg);
null

Please refer:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/oramag/oracle/09-mar/o29asktom.html?_template=/ocom/print
Edited by: SKU on 19-Dec-2009 05:10

Numerous trace files are generating every minute causing space issue

Hi All,
numerous trace files are generating every minute <SID>_<PID>_APPSPERF01.trc format.
entry in trace file will be like..
EXEC #10:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=1734896627,tim=1339571764486430
WAIT #10: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 6 driver id=1952673792 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=34562 tim=1339571764491273
FETCH #10:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=2,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=1,plh=1734896627,tim=1339571764486430
WAIT #10: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 277 driver id=1952673792 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=34562 tim=1339571764491806
EXEC #11:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=2638510909,tim=1339571764486430
FETCH #11:c=0,e=0,p=0,cr=9,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=2638510909,tim=1339571764486430
WAIT #11: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 6 driver id=1952673792 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=34562 tim=1339571764493265
*** 2012-06-13 03:16:14.496
WAIT #11: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 10003326 driver id=1952673792 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=34562 tim=1339571774496705
BINDS #10:
Bind#0
oacdty=01 mxl=32(21) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=00 fl2=1000001 frm=01 csi=871 siz=2064 off=0
kxsbbbfp=2b8ec799df38 bln=32 avl=03 flg=05
value="535"
Bind#1
oacdty=01 mxl=32(21) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=00 fl2=1000001 frm=01 csi=871 siz=0 off=32
kxsbbbfp=2b8ec799df58 bln=32 avl=04 flg=01
value="1003"
SQL> show parameter trace
NAME TYPE VALUE
tracefiles_public boolean TRUE
log_archive_trace integer 0
sec_protocol_error_trace_action string TRACE
sql_trace boolean FALSE
trace_enabled boolean TRUE
tracefile_identifier string
Profile options like "FND:Debug Log Enabled" and "Utilities:SQL Trace" are set to No
Can some one help me to stop these trace generation.
is there any way to find the cause for these trace?
Thanks in adv...

Hi;
Please check who enable trace. Please see:
How to audit users who enabled traces?
check concurrent programs first
*from the screen
*F11, then select the trace, then Ctrl+F11
Concurrent > program > define
open the form, press F11 (query mode), select the trace, then (ctrl + f11) this should return all concurrent programs which have trace enabled
Regard
Helios

Return code in trace file from ST01

Hello All,
Does anybody know what are the values for the return code (0,4,8,12,16) in an trace file from ST01 ?
Thanks you All !

seems that you are very bored during the day ....
The ST01 displays the raw data for the ST05, that is something which you will never in normal life. Return codes are also displayed in ST05, but even there you don't really need them.
If you ask this question here in the performance forum then I would definitely advise you to switch to the condensed form of the ST05
(SQL statement summary) see here:
SQL trace:
/people/siegfried.boes/blog/2007/09/05/the-sql-trace-st05-150-quick-and-easy
This condensed forum shows you all the information whioch you need for about 90% of your work.
kind regads Siegfried

Analyzing the trace file

Does someone know the meaning of the NTTCNR and the NTTVLSER codes in the
trace file from the Oracle server????
Below is an example of the mentioned codes in the trace:
nttcnr: entry
nttcnr: waiting to accept a connection.
nttvlser: entry
nttvlser: valid node check on incoming node 10.20.30.201
nttvlser: Accepted Entry: 10.20.30.201
nttcnr: exit
null

Hi,
I am new in sap i would like to mare about ST01 in deatil .
Regards
Pallav

Error in trace file

Following is getting created in D:\Oracle\Ora81\DATABASE folder once or twice a month. I do not see any error entries in db1alrt.log. Please help to find out the problem.
Thanks,
Anil
Dump file .\ORA05244.TRC
Sun May 01 21:30:07 2005
ORACLE V8.1.5.0.0 - Production vsnsta=0
vsnsql=d vsnxtr=3
Windows NT V5.2, OS V14.206, CPU type 586
Oracle8i Release 8.1.5.0.0 - Production
With the Java option
PL/SQL Release 8.1.5.0.0 - Production
Windows NT V5.2, OS V14.206, CPU type 586
Instance name: db1
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 0 <none>
Oracle process number: 0
5244
*** 2005.05.01.21.30.07.127
ksedmp: internal or fatal error
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [508], [163], [0], [1413697536], [1], [0], [], []
Current SQL information unavailable - no session.
----- Call Stack Trace -----
calling call entry argument values in hex
location type point (? means dubious value)
ksedmp+a5                       CALLrel ksedst+0
75BE3F8
ksfdmp+e                        CALLrel ksedmp+0 3
_kgeriv+95                       CALLreg 00000000
ED16A08
3
kgeasi+67                       CALLrel kgeriv+0
1E440
0 1FC
5
675BE570
kslwte+11a                      CALLrel kgeasi+0
ED16A08
0 1FC
2 5 0
A3 0
0 0
54435000
0 1 0
0
opikndf2+537                    CALLrel kslwte+0 A3
54435000
1 0
_opitsk+3da                      CALLreg 00000000
ED193E4
2
675BF544
1 0
opiino+50c                      CALLrel opitsk+0 0
_opiodr+4ce                      CALLreg 00000000                         3C 4
675BFBF8
opidrv+380                      CALLrel opiodr+0 3C 4
675BFBF8
0
sou2o+19                        CALLrel opidrv+0
opimai+110                      CALLrel sou2o+0
OracleThreadStart@4+48c         CALLrel opimai+0 2
675BFE78
77E4A98D CALLreg 00000000
----- Argument/Register Address Dump -----
Argument/Register addr=675be3f8. Dump of memory from 0x675BE3B8 to 0x675BE4F8
675BE3A0 00000000 00000003
675BE3C0 E8D60800 6552211C 00000033 00000000 FFFFFFFD 00000048 00000000 00000000
675BE3E0 00000000 00000000 0000001D 2ED16888 675BE408 00418404 00C936B4 00C936B4
675BE400 00C936D4 00C936B4 00C936B4 00C936B4 00C936BC 00C936B4 00C936BC 00C936B4
675BE420 00C936B4 00C936B4 00C936B4 00C936BC 675BE4E0 004191E0 675BE444 0000001C
675BE440 00000000 2A2A2A0A 30303220 35302E35 2E31302E 332E3132 37302E30 32332D25
675BE460 2D252073 25207338 7332332D 675F0020 00000000 00000001 000007D5 35373620
675BE480 37454642 25200038 7332332D 342D2520 00000A73 00000003 65522178 00000033
675BE4A0 00000000 2ED16888 01218A97 00000000 00000000 00000000 675BFFEC 00000000
675BE4C0 675BFE78 00000000 00000001 00000001 00000000 675BDDD0 00000009 675BE504
*** Trace file full ***

you have what one session wants the other session has what you want; neither will give it up and so Oracle detects this and kicks one out. If you trace your SQL and COMMIT logic you will find the problem

ST05 doesn't work : can't open trace file

Hi,
I am used to work with ST05 for years, but today, the trace DOESN'T WORK !! The trace activation and deactivation seem okay, but display triggers the following 2 errors : "File end of performance trace file detected -> See long text" (message 0S161), and "Could not open performance trace file" (message 0S113). I deleted all trace files in ST01, and tried again, but still the same errors.
I couldn't find anything in sap forums, notes, etc. Sometimes, it may work again, but only for a few seconds. Strange. Maybe disk full? Or memory? (buffers are undersized, total memory is 1GB)
But remember: it was working with the roughly same config since the beginning.
Any ideas?
Thx a lot.

@Rob, how do you know? :-D (sorry but I must cleanup my history of watches (of my own threads too) because it's impossible to display the watch page (so that to turn forums watch off, allow being watched config , etc.) when there are too many thread watches)
@Gana, maybe: ask the server to be restarted... and ask the admins to see if there are disk or network issues...

Fail to ping standby . error = 3113 in trace files (oracle 9i)

Hi there. One of my standby databases is not working properly, I mean is not synchronized with primary. Both database are 9i Release 2 running on Compaq Tru64 servers
I look for the primary trace files and I found this trace file:
$ vi umercado_arc1_141731.trc
"umercado_arc1_141731.trc" 28 lines, 1164 characters
/oracle/app/oracle/admin/umercado/bdump/umercado_arc1_141731.trc
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining options
JServer Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production
ORACLE_HOME = /oracle/app/oracle/product/9.2.0
System name: OSF1
Node name: utora01.emsut.com.sv
Release: V5.1
Version: 2650
Machine: alpha
Instance name: umercado
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 13
Unix process pid: 141731, image: [email protected] (ARC1)
*** SESSION ID:(10.1) 2008-09-02 16:03:38.240
Destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2 is in CLUSTER CONSISTENT mode
Destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2 is in MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE mode
Destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2 is in CLUSTER CONSISTENT mode
Destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2 is in MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE mode
*** 2008-09-03 11:22:29.405
RFS network connection lost at host 'umercado3'
Fail to ping standby 'umercado3', error = 3113
Error 3113 when pinging standby umercado3.
*** 2008-09-03 11:22:29.411
kcrrfail: dest:3 err:3113 force:0
Destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2 is in CLUSTER CONSISTENT mode
Destination LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_2 is in MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE mode
The error I want to highlight is "FAIL TO PING STANDBY UMERCADO3, ERROR 3113"
I did this testings on the primary server:
- Unix ping to standby node , ok
- tnsping to standby database (tnsping umercado3), ok
Therefore I do not find the reason for this error. By this time I have defeered the transfer from the primary to standby.
Any advice is welcome.
Thanks!

Suggestion: would attempt to make a sqlplus connection from the primary to the standby using the tns entry that you have configured for the log_archive_dest parameter. you need to connect to the standby as sys.
What happened:
I did a sqlplus connection ON THE PRIMARY DATABASE using the tns entry that is exactly the same used in log_archive_dest_2 parameter. Here is it:
SQL> conn sys/*********@UMERCADO3 as sysdba
Connected.
Therefore I do not think it is a problem in the standby password file.
Any suggestions?

MDDataSetBW.GetCellData. See RFC trace file or SAP system log for more...

Ingo,
I am getting below error message in BO Test environment when I refresh WebI document.
MDDataSetBW.GetCellData. See RFC trace file or SAP system log for more details
It was working when we migrated the objects initially. Subsequently when we try to refresh WebI document we are getting the above error message. It still works in BO Dev environment and the no of records are the same in Dev and Test.
I am able run the underlying BEx query in SAP BW Test environment and it does return data.
I checked ST22 and SM21 log, but no details there.
Is it related to Authorization on the Universe or Bex Query?
We are in the middle of UAT and not able to move forward. I would greatly appreciate your input.
Thanks
Ram

Ingo,
I ran the zip file and added the required entries to registry.
And then I tried to reproduce the error, but the files are not generated instead I noticeed below error message on the server:
The description for Event ID ( 7939 ) in Source ( Crystal OLAP Client ) cannot be found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote computer. You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE= flag to retrieve this description; see Help and Support for details. The following information is part of the event: Registry Access Error: , [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE]Software\Business Objects\Suite 12.0\MDA\Log\Modules: The system cannot find the file specified..
Does tha t mean we do not have permissons to read the registry?
I would greatly appreciate your input.
Thanks in advance.
Ram

Checking block corruption, why in alert it is saying Error in trace file

Hi,
I am using Oracle 10g 10.2.0.1 with linux 32 bit
I wanted to check block corruption using RMAN by following statement
backup validate check logical database;
when i executed the statement, following was the output
Starting backup at 09-MAY-08
allocated channel: ORA_DISK_1
channel ORA_DISK_1: sid=91 devtype=DISK
channel ORA_DISK_1: starting full datafile backupset
channel ORA_DISK_1: specifying datafile(s) in backupset
input datafile fno=00004 name=/u01/app/oracle/oradata/test/users01.dbf
input datafile fno=00008 name=/u01/app/oracle/oradata/test/workflowuser
input datafile fno=00001 name=/u01/app/oracle/oradata/test/system01.dbf
input datafile fno=00003 name=/u01/app/oracle/oradata/test/sysaux01.dbf
input datafile fno=00010 name=/u01/app/oracle/oradata/test/ifan
input datafile fno=00002 name=/u01/app/oracle/oradata/test/undotbs01.dbf
input datafile fno=00007 name=/u01/app/oracle/oradata/test/taker
input datafile fno=00009 name=/u01/app/oracle/oradata/test/testing1
input datafile fno=00005 name=/u01/app/oracle/oradata/test/brokerdb
input datafile fno=00006 name=/u01/app/oracle/oradata/test/moneio
input datafile fno=00011 name=/u01/app/oracle/oradata/test/web1
input datafile fno=00012 name=/u01/app/oracle/oradata/test/e1
input datafile fno=00013 name=/u01/app/oracle/oradata/test/ind1
channel ORA_DISK_1: backup set complete, elapsed time: 00:06:57
channel ORA_DISK_1: starting full datafile backupset
channel ORA_DISK_1: specifying datafile(s) in backupset
including current control file in backupset
including current SPFILE in backupset
channel ORA_DISK_1: backup set complete, elapsed time: 00:00:02
Finished backup at 09-MAY-08
and when i do the following query
select * from v$database_block_corruption in sqlplus
then there was no row
so it means there is no logical corruption, but when i am looking at alert log file it is giving following lines
Fri May 9 10:14:04 2008
Errors in file /u01/app/oracle/admin/test/udump/test_ora_6606.trc:
Fri May 9 10:14:04 2008
Errors in file /u01/app/oracle/admin/test/udump/test_ora_6606.trc:
Fri May 9 10:14:04 2008
Errors in file /u01/app/oracle/admin/test/udump/test_ora_6606.trc
and in above trace file following contents
/u01/app/oracle/admin/test4/udump/test_ora_6606.trc
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
ORACLE_HOME = /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1
System name: Linux
Node name: test
Release: 2.6.18-5-686
Version: #1 SMP Wed Oct 3 00:12:50 UTC 2007
Machine: i686
Instance name: test
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 61
Unix process pid: 6606, image: oracle@test (TNS V1-V3)
*** 2008-05-09 10:14:04.093
*** ACTION NAME:(0000040 STARTED19) 2008-05-09 10:14:04.071
*** MODULE NAME:(backup full datafile) 2008-05-09 10:14:04.071
*** SERVICE NAME:(SYS$USERS) 2008-05-09 10:14:04.071
*** SESSION ID:(91.40318) 2008-05-09 10:14:04.071
Is it normal, why the in alert file it is saying that Error in.
And it did not create any backupset in folder of flash recovery but in Enterprise manager it is showing last backup on 09-may-2008, why ?
Regards,

See logical corruption is normally termed as the internal inconsistancy within the block which is not caused by Oracle but by the user.So if you find internal inconsistancy than the best option is to look at the user and ask him to get the values sorted out.If the internal inconsistancy is some thig like index fragmentation sort of things or index entry pointing to a null rowid than they are termed as the logical corruption and they should not impact your normal as he data is already there and there is no issue in reading the block as such.
The term "corrupted blocks" I would call both in the tables and backup for those data blocks which are unreadable by Oracle which actualy is Physical corruption.
If i am doing the checking at 2:00 am, does it take more than two hours.I didnt understand this.
what can we do for Physical corruptionThis will need the block to be recovered with the Block Recover command of RMAN and a good backup.Read about it here,
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/backup.102/b14194/rcmsynta010.htm
About the Logical and Physical corruption checks , check here
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/backup.102/b14191/rcmconc1012.htm
Aman....

Solution Manager trace file ? Details of all systems messages ?

Hi,
I had developed custom applications involving different systems like IDES, R/3, File system and web services and BPM scenarios.
These systems are integrated with XI, and now I want to monitor the message exchanges between these systems.
I need all information (in form of txt or log trace file) containing
which systems are involved. Parameters used during communications data exchanged between them or message header, content of the messages etc.
As far as I know log files contain lot of information about user activities like transactions executed, messages exchanged between systems etc......I already tried to monitor the log files at XI level, but it contain very less information about the executions.
Solution manager and remote systems configurations are already done.
I have the following questions.....
1) Will Solution manager be the right choice to monitor such information ? If yes, then where and how ?
2) Is there any combined log file in solution manager which contain all log information about the connected systems ?
3) Where I can find the log files of solution manager ? (Is there a single file which contains all information?)
4) How communication (message exchanges) between composite applications is monitored in SAP ?
How to switch on tracing for Log file (which trace level and what settings), offcourse it will generate lot of data
Regards,
hussaan

Hi,
Please download that attachment "scripts_1139623.sar" provided in SAP Note 1139623 - Using transaction RZ20 to monitor remote Oracle databases.
Upon extraction of scripts_1139623.sar the following files you will get.
rz20_nonabap.sql
dbcheckora10_oltp.sql
dbcheckora.sql
Then Perform the below mentioned Steps to resolve your issue.
Step 1: Create tables DBCHECKORA and DBMSGORA:
sqlplus SAPSR3DB/<pwd>
SQL> @rz20_nonabap.sql
Step 2: Fill the table DBCHECKORA:
sqlplus SAPSR3DB/<pwd>
SQL> @dbcheckora10_oltp
Step 3: Create the synonyms (as user ora<sid>):
brconnect -u / -c -f crsyn -o SAPSR3DB
sqlplus "/as sysdba"
CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM SAP_DBSTATC FOR SAPSR3DB.DBSTATC;
CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM SAP_DBCHECKORA FOR SAPSR3DB.DBCHECKORA;
CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM SAP_DBMSGORA FOR SAPSR3DB.DBMSGORA;
Step 4: Grant Privileges for OPS$<SID>ADM User for the above created Tables
sqlplus "/as sysdba"
grant all on SAPSR3DB.DBSTATC to OPS$<SID>ADM;
grant all on SAPSR3DB.DBCHECKORA to OPS$<SID>ADM;
grant all on SAPSR3DB.DBMSGORA to OPS$<SID>ADM;
grant all on SAPSR3DB.DBSTAIHORA to OPS$<SID>ADM;
grant all on SAPSR3DB.DBSTATHORA to OPS$<SID>ADM;
grant all on SAPSR3DB.DBSTATIORA to OPS$<SID>ADM;
grant all on SAPSR3DB.DBSTATTORA to OPS$<SID>ADM;
commit;
Step 5:
Now after successful execution of above mentioned Steps , in DBACOCKPIT (system configuration), try to save the Remote DB entry with "Collect Alert Data". It will be saved without any error.
If you find any errors, post the error contents as a reply of this thread message.
Regards,
Bhavik G. Shroff

Trace files vs. AWR

Can I gather additional information using trace session or it's same information as using AWR reports?
Is there any situation that trace files are better than AWR - of course instead fact that tkprof is for free.

tutus wrote:
OK, understand.
But if so, when I should use ASH and in which situation I should use tkprof? Is there any best case studies for each tool?Roughly speaking the standard 10046 trace file gives you all the details for a single session; the ASH content is like sampling 1% of the same details across every single session. By capturing ASH you have a historic sample of every 10046 even when you're not expecting a problem.
If you are anticipating a problem from an individual, or program, you would enable tracing for that specific activity so that you could analyse exactly where it spent its time.
After a problem has occurred, you can go back in time with ASH because it is likely to have captured some of the details of the problem events and will therefore give you a clue (possibly even a very strong clue) about what code and what sessions caused or suffered from a problem.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
To post code, statspack/AWR report, execution plans or trace files, start and end the section with the tag {noformat}{noformat} (lowercase, curly brackets, no spaces) so that the text appears in fixed format.
There is a +"Preview"+ tab at the top of the text entry panel. Use this to check what your message will look like before you post the message. If it looks a complete mess you're unlikely to get a response. (Click on the +"Plain text"+ tab if you want to edit the text to tidy it up.)
"Science is more than a body of knowledge; it is a way of thinking"
Carl Sagan

Sql net trace file

Hi All,
Our prod db is 2 nodes RAC 10g in MS window 2003 servers. It is located in a remote place. Recently one of our local app servers lost connection to this db although we can tnsping it but got ORA3113 error when we tried to logon using sql plus. Most of our local PCs did not have problem logon at all. We enabled the sql net trace on this app server and network administrators spent a lot of time on this and finally shutdown one of the app servers in the same remote location which seemed cause a lot of network traffic with a local app server. So the problem went away and the app server can logon to the db now. I (I know nothing about network) tried to read the sql net trace file generated during the trouble time using the help outlined in the “Examining Oracle Net Trace Files” written by Kevin Reardon. The error happened after client sending server character set and conversion graph it supports and before receiving character set and conversion graph from the server. It took a minute in this step and finally gave up. Following is a section of the trace file where error happens. My question is: even we know when the error happens and at what step how can we use this info to further identify the root cause: Is this because we have too much network traffic which caused timeout or other reason(s)? By the way our db servers have “INBOUND_CONNECT_TIMEOUT=180" (3 minutes) in the sqlnet.ora file and whole trace file starts at [06-NOV-2009 14:50:23:352] and ends at [06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:758] which is a little over 1 minute. Greatly appreciate your insights and thoughts.
Shirley
[06-NOV-2009 14:50:23:836] nsdo: normal exit
[06-NOV-2009 14:50:23:836] nsdo: entry
[06-NOV-2009 14:50:23:836] nsdo: cid=0, opcode=85, *bl=0, *what=0, uflgs=0x0, cflgs=0x3
[06-NOV-2009 14:50:23:836] nsdo: rank=64, nsctxrnk=0
[06-NOV-2009 14:50:23:836] nsdo: nsctx: state=8, flg=0x400d, mvd=0
[06-NOV-2009 14:50:23:836] nsdo: gtn=127, gtc=127, ptn=10, ptc=32730
[06-NOV-2009 14:50:23:836] nsdo: switching to application buffer
[06-NOV-2009 14:50:23:836] nsrdr: entry
[06-NOV-2009 14:50:23:836] nsrdr: recving a packet
[06-NOV-2009 14:50:23:836] nsprecv: entry
[06-NOV-2009 14:50:23:836] nsprecv: reading from transport...
[06-NOV-2009 14:50:23:836] nttrd: entry
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] nttrd: exit
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] ntt2err: entry
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] ntt2err: Read unexpected EOF ERROR on 644
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] ntt2err: exit
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] nsprecv: error exit
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] nserror: entry
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] nserror: nsres: id=0, op=68, ns=12537, ns2=12560; nt[0]=507, nt[1]=0, nt[2]=0; ora[0]=0, ora[1]=0, ora[2]=0
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] nsrdr: error exit
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] nsdo: nsctxrnk=0
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] nsdo: error exit
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] nioqer: entry
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] nioqer: incoming err = 12151
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] nioqce: entry
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] nioqce: exit
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] nioqer: returning err = 3113
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] nioqer: exit
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] nioqrc: exit
[06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742] nioqrs: entry

I am certainly not an expert in this area, but these lines are of interest
>
06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742 ntt2err: Read unexpected EOF ERROR on 644
06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742 nserror: nsres: id=0, op=68, ns=12537, ns2=12560; nt[0]=507, nt[1]=0, nt[2]=0; ora[0]=0, ora[1]=0, ora[2]=0
06-NOV-2009 14:51:24:742 nioqer: incoming err = 12151
>
The TNS 12537, 12560 and 12151 codes indicate network errors.
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14219/tnsus.htm#sthref14851
Is this a consistently reproducible error ? Do other applications on this network operate without error ?
HTH
Srini

TRACE file question

I traced a user session against our TEST database to try and find out why an error is occuring. That trace file was quite large, with several queries showing up as going against SYSTEM tables:
select /*+ index(idl_sb4$ i_idl_sb41) +*/ piece#,length,piece
from
idl_sb4$ where obj#=:1 and part=:2 and version=:3 order by piece#When I traced a session against the PRODUCTION database there were far fewer entries. In fact, here were the differences:
TEST
       1 session in tracefile.
      13 user SQL statements in trace file.
     109 internal SQL statements in trace file.
     122 SQL statements in trace file.
      51 unique SQL statements in trace file.
    3964 lines in trace file.
       0 elapsed seconds in trace file.PROD
       1 session in tracefile.
      15 user SQL statements in trace file.
       3 internal SQL statements in trace file.
      18 SQL statements in trace file.
      17 unique SQL statements in trace file.
     650 lines in trace file.
       0 elapsed seconds in trace file.Why is there a difference between the two. The section of the Form throwing the error in TEST has not been changed from what's in PROD. But, I'm missing 2 user statements, one of which is the one I'm most interested in.
Thanks
-Chuck

Thank you very much, Mr. Forstmann, for your quick response.
It is really helpful. But I have one further question. Since our server space is limited and we can't keep those trace files forever. So I still need to delete inactive trace files to save some space. Could you please tell how to found out if files are open or closed in a SunOS 5.10 server?
Thanks a lot,
Shirley

No entries in trace file - ST01

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for