No entry in table T512W  "SAP HR PY"

Hi  Experts,
when I am trying to run a Payroll faced this error message :
"No entry in table T512W for key 99 /001
for time 15.04.2011"
Can any one  help me
Thank u so much
Mohammed Othman

Check the WT /001 in table T512W for coountry group 99....and also check the valididty dates for that WT. If it exists then check the Payroll log where your getting exact error....Check the Input and Processing in the log.....check while processing which WT you are getting error.
Mohan

Similar Messages

  • No entry in table T512W for key 40 9913

    Dear Guru
    When I am running simulation payroll run, system is throwing this error "No entry in table T512W for key 40 9913".
    9913 is the wage type which is getting updated due to INCS rule.
    In the log, 9913 value is same as value of EDLI Contribution
    /3F7 EDLI contri0101                                                    32.50
    9913            0101                                                    32.50
    I checked 40EPF feature and checked master data in 587, all are correct.Is there something I need to check? Please guide
    Regards
    Vikas K Sharma

    Hi
    I checked the customized WT entry table and there is no 9 series WT at all.
    Recently patches were updated in development. Do I have to check 40EPF features or something. I was reading some reply here but I am not clear how to do such changes.
    Please guide.
    Regards
    Vikas K Sharma

  • No entry in table T512W for key 40 0NPA

    Hi ! all
    i have some problem in payroll processing.
    i have delimited the wage type 0NPA with end date as 26.11.2008. This wage type was a used for EPF calculation. Now there is change in policy with effect from 25.11.2008. This wage type is no longer a part of EPF calculation. So i delimited the same wef from 26.11.2008. Now am trying to process the salary for period 01.04.2009 to 30.04.2009, i am getting an error
    " No entry in table T512W for key 40 0NPA for time 30.04.2009 ".
    This is an indian salary senario.
    Kindly  suggest the solution.
    regards
    Sanjay Petkar

    Hi !  partha
    Thanks for the reply.
    I tried what you said
    in SM30 modified V_512W_D for 0NPA and removed tick from cummulation item 11(EPF)
    and processed the paybill i am till getting the same error.
    I missed to mentioned that, i created the new wage type copy of the 0NPA  as NPBS. As NPA is to be paid to employees but this should not be taken for EPF calculation. so i am using the new code for NPA and discontinue 0NPA.
    Kindly suggest solution to overcome this problem
    Regards
    Sanjay Petkar

  • No entry in table in T512W

    No entry in table in T512W
    Below is the pcr i wrote
    8000 Personnel Calculation Rule  8000
          6000 Bonus
            NUM?10     Comparison
                AMT=  1000 Set
                AMT+1000   Addition
                ADDWT 1000 OT   Output table
              <
                AMT=  1000 Set
                AMT+2000   Addition
                ADDWT 1000 OT   Output table
    Placed sub schema in schema
    00080 PIT   8000      NOAB        Decision Making
    Maintained Additional Payment
    When Iam executing payroll for the month of 01.06.2014 It is throwing an error Experts please let me know where it went wrong

    Hi,
    For your Bonus Wage type, no specificatiopn has been maintained for Processing Class '72'. Check the wage type in V_512W under Country grouping '40' and maintain the specification as per your requirement.
    You may refer B100, B101, B102, B103 model wage types.
    Thanks
    Madhav.

  • TIP: Changing entries directly in any SAP table

    Use transaction SE16N -> Enter the table name and press enter to read the fields in.
    Then type &SAP_EDIT in the transaction area (as a function code) and hit enter. A success message displays saying "SAP Editing function is activated".
    You can now execute the report and you can edit any field except the key fields.
    Use with caution!!!
    This is a replacement of the blog at [/people/kevin.wilson2/blog/2009/09/29/tip-editing-any-table-in-sap|/people/kevin.wilson2/blog/2009/09/29/tip-editing-any-table-in-sap] which has stirred so many great discussion points on security.

    >
    J@Y wrote:
    > ... it would help for Ztable data as you mentioned.
    In that case one could argue that the authority-checks are both too strict (for the system debugger) and not granular enough (for the replace function in the ABAP debugger).
    Reason: For the package and the object name, the system is checking against a DUMMY element on all 3 activities used by the command. This is the equivalent of "anything which is something" in the ABAP world. If you call it programatically, then only the ability to display something in the debugger is sufficient to change everything...
    So, if you have access to execute ABAP workbench objects combined with the ability to debug a Smartform, then you can change any database table which you could prior also have displayed.
    OR
    Don't give anyone any debug authority in production at all.
    Works like a charm and the developers eventually start testing their programs more in DEV and QAS and taking collective responsibility for the quality of the coding in the first place...
    Cheers and enjoy the weekend (hopefully without having to be called in the middle of the night to debug some program which won't execute, or debug a table because the program did execute...
    Julius

  • Internal table in sap script

    Hello All ,
    I  have got a internal table with tracking numbers and I want to print all the numbers in that internal table on sap script.
    Please advise.
    Thanks
    Moderator message:  please search for available information before asking.
    locked by: Thomas Zloch on Sep 13, 2010 1:09 PM

    Hi,
    You can create a sub-routine and pass all the table entries in variables and then you can print them.

  • I have to make Multiple entry at table maintanance at a time

    Hello all,
    My requirment is to enable the multple user can loginto the same table for making there entry simultaneosuly .
    i have created the table and table maintance as well. and i have created the new lock object and added the code accrdingly and i have used the custom fm which is generated in the tablemainta  function group.
    forex: table xyz
    user 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5,so on..
    table should allow all user tomake there entry at time and the entry edited one user should be disabled to other user.
    I have gone the forum i didnt found the correct one ..plz guide me ..plz find the attached code .i got this code and referredthe samein my prog ..any suggestions on the below.
    1.       Create table ZTEST_SHUKS3.
    2.       Create table maintenance generator for the table. 
    3       Create lock object EYTSS_E433SH in SE11. Give it name as EZTEST_SHUKS3. 
    4       create a report  ZREP_SHUKS3 and transaction code ZTEST_SHUKS3  to call this report. This tcode will call table  mainatance     generator of table ZTEST_SHUKS3 . 
    5  create the report as below
    6 Now open table maintenance function  group(ZTEST_SHUKS3)  in SE80.We know for table maintenance SAP automatically creates code in the function group. Now we will make some modification in that existing code to change the behavior. Open the screen you created through table maintenance and add one module. 
    screen: 0001
    double clik on screen and add one module in PBO of the screen
    loop at extract with control
    tctrl_ZTEST_SHUKS3 CURSOR NEXTLINE.
    MODULE LIST SHOW LISTE
    ADD HERE
    MODULE m_change_locking
    Check the code below to be added in the module m_change_locking. 
    MODULE m_change_locking OUTPUT.
    *Call the function module corresponding to the lock object we created
      CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUEUE_EZTEST_SHUKS3'
        EXPORTING
          matnr          = ztest_shuks3-matnr
          werks          = ztest_shuks3-werks
        EXCEPTIONS
          foreign_lock   = 1
          system_failure = 2
          OTHERS         = 3.
      IF sy-subrc NE 0.
    row is locked..hence gray..
        LOOP AT SCREEN.
          screen-input = 0.
          MODIFY SCREEN.
        ENDLOOP.
      ENDIF.
    ENDMODULE.                 " m_change_locking  OUTPUT 
    REPORT  zrep_shuks3.
    **Selection range for view maintenance
    DATA:
      BEGIN OF selekttab OCCURS 1.         "Selektionsbereich
            INCLUDE STRUCTURE vimsellist.
    DATA: END OF selekttab,
    **Table of inactive CUA functions for view maintenance
    BEGIN OF excl_cua_funct OCCURS 1.    "inaktive CUA-Fkt bei View-Pflege
            INCLUDE STRUCTURE vimexclfun.
    DATA: END OF excl_cua_funct.
    DATA: lt_enq_del TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF seqg3,
          lt_enq_read TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF seqg7,
          lw_enq_read TYPE seqg7,
          lw_enq_del TYPE seqg3,
          lv_subrc TYPE sy-subrc.
    *Read all the lock details in system
    CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUE_READ2'
      EXPORTING
        gclient = sy-mandt
        gname   = ' '
        guname  = '*'
      TABLES
        enq     = lt_enq_read.
    *We will search entry for table level lock for our table
    LOOP AT lt_enq_read INTO lw_enq_read
    WHERE gname EQ 'RSTABLE'
    AND   garg CS 'ZTEST_SHUKS3'.
      MOVE-CORRESPONDING lw_enq_read TO lw_enq_del.
      APPEND lw_enq_del TO lt_enq_del.
    ENDLOOP.
    *Delete table level lock entry for our table
    CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUE_DELETE'
      EXPORTING
        check_upd_requests = 1
      IMPORTING
        subrc              = lv_subrc
      TABLES
        enq                = lt_enq_del.
    *Now call the table maintenace generator.
    CALL FUNCTION 'VIEW_MAINTENANCE_CALL'
      EXPORTING
        action               = 'U'
        view_name            = 'ZTEST_SHUKS3'
        show_selection_popup = 'X'
      TABLES
        dba_sellist          = selekttab
        excl_cua_funct       = excl_cua_funct.
    I followed the same steps but still not getting the multiple user enable .
    plz help
    regards
    Raju
    Edited by: abaprthree on Jul 22, 2009 7:54 PM

    Hi,
    I think you are looking for the report which will allow only for entries not for change. In this case, at PBO you write the code to make all the rows in display mode which have records using LOOP at SCREEN .....ENDLOOP. When you click on on NEW ENTRY button, add blank rows and put user entries. When you save,check for existing entries in the table because many users are entering the data at the same time, so check for duplicates KEY entries and UPDATE the table on SAVE button. If you will go in this way, I don't think you have to go for LOCK object. It's required only if you are going for EDIT mode.

  • Problem in creation table for sap 4.6

    hello evrybody
    i have just a problem in creating table with se11;after saving and activite those table and zhen i select icon  of contents it bloocks and shoz this  error message :
    Error reading table TMCNV; RC = 4
    Message no. BMG 135
    thank you for your help
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on Apr 6, 2010 10:20 AM

    Seems like you have a material number field (domain with conversion routine MATN1 or alike) and table TMCNV does not have the entry with key 'MATCONV', check the where used-list of message BMG 135. I assume this entry comes delivered by SAP, so try to restore it.
    Also search for OSS notes with "TMCNV" or "BMG 135".
    Thomas

  • Protection of Key SAP HR tables in SAP R/3 Upgrade

    Hello,
    We are upgrading SAP R/3 to ECC 6.0. We have SAP HR, that also needs to be upgraded. Based on this, I have 4 queries, seen below.
    1- What are the Pre-reqs and protection of data related activities prior to doing the above upgrade? 
    2- What are the key tables (in SAP R/3 and SAP HR) to be protected prior to "OR" during a upgrade?
    3- What are the key tables (in SAP BW) to be protected prior to "OR" during a upgrade?
    4- What is the length of a typical upgrade? (Is there a tool to analyze the expected time duration?)
    Thanks for help in advance

    Hi Abdul
    Please find answers to your questions below .
    One should be very careful with the upgrades with HR or BW unlike normal upgrades. Though upgrade do not delete any data but some exceptional tables may be skipped by upgrade and which will not have any data after system is converted to target
    1.
    Befoe prepare
    Check SAP_HR 46C SP level
    during  Prepare
    Add ST-A/PI in upgarde as well so that error will not be in JOB_RDDNTPUR
    include all support package of the SAP_HR comp in BIND _PATCH phase
    Before upgarde phase :
    Backup table T512W(wage types in HR )
    Before downtime
    backup ST03 data
    2. Key table in HR upgrade is T512W 
    3. check the upgrade guide for BW
    4. The best prractice for this kind of project is to have upgrade system (sandbox which is copy of development ) . Try to have similar hardware configuration as PRD
    This system will give the timeline for entire upgrade
    Upgrade depends on hardware ,database ,size of database ,no of support packs binded in
    So matra is " Read Read and Read "
    Success !!
    Ganesh

  • Logical system entry for table entry

    Hi,
      After system copy from one system name to another , I am facing some inconsistenices in various tables.
    The table entry can be seen in se16.But when I try to select entries from the same table using SELECT statement, table are not getting populated.
    I ran the BDLS also . How do I check the logical system entried for table where I have inconsistent entries?
    Thanks,
    Chitta

    Hello Chitta,
    But when I try to select entries from the same table using SELECT statement, table are not getting populated.
    what are you trying to populate?
    If your question is, its not showing anything... what error message you're getting? are you trying to run in the DB level?
    If you're getting error, that this object doesn't exist in the database then you might not be logging with correct user. its an SAP table, then its owner is the SAP schema user. If you login with the schema user, it should show in a normal select statement. But if you login with <sid>adm then you have to give the correct schema id before tablename.
    select * from <SchemaID>.<tablename>
    SchemaID may be sapr3, sapsr3, or sap<SID> depending on your release.
    Regards,
    Debasis.

  • How to create Infotype entry in table T777D

    Hi All,
    We have undergone Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0.
    Now we get an error while maintaining certain data infotype 0122 does not exists.
    I looked at the entries in table T777D in both the system. In older system the entry is there but not in the new system.
    When i tried creating the entry in this table the error comes 'Module pool program MP012200 is not present'. This program was there in 4.6C but is not there in ECC 6.0.
    How do we genrate this program or how do we create the entry for this infotype to correct the error.
    Is there any customizing settings that is required?
    Please advice.
    Regards,
    Vidya.

    Look at OSS [Note 546167 - Termination in PA10: Infotype 0122 does not exist|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/546167]
    >Symptom
    >
    >When you edit the master data (transaction PA10) after you upgrade Release 4.6C to Release 4.70 or higher, a termination occurs and an error message is issued informing you that infotype 0122 does not exist.
    >
    >Other terms
    >
    >No entry in table T777D
    >
    >Solution
    >
    >In the 'Infotype attributes (Customizing)' view (extended table maintenance for view V_T582A), delete the entry for infotype 0122.
    >In the 'Infotypes - country-specific settings' view (extended table maintenance for view V_T582L), delete the entry for infotype 0122.
    Regards

  • Corresponding entry in table SRRELROLES for Idoc

    Hi,
    Can anybody please help me how to find the corresponding table entry in table SRRELROLES if I know the Idoc number created in inbound process in SAP R/3 system?
    What should be the OBJKEY for the Idoc no?
    Thanks & regards,
    Yogita

    Hi Yogita,
    Check these posts, Which has been answered.
    Re: Purchase order IDOC relationship
    Re: Need help in Conversion
    Regards,
    Satish

  • Problem with No entry in table T591B for 0015 08 E101

    Hi all,
    This is our first year using SAP and we're approaching our first Year End and so want to make the E Wage Types available for us in IT0015, E121 is already OK and I can enter data in IT0015 for that WT no problem. I've added WT E101 to the 0015 Additional Payments in the IMG and it shows as being allowed for IT0015, this has created entries in the Permissability, etc. in the IMG and I've updated permisability for the ESG to allow for all ESG / PS, etc. - so all looks fine when I work through the steps for Additional Payments in the IMG, but when I try to save E101 in IT0015 I get a message about 'No entry in table T591B for 0015 08 E101' .
    When I look at this table it's called 'WT dependent retroactive accounting trigger' and I've not seen it before despite setting up many Wage Types and I can see E121 is in this table but E101 isn't - but I can't see how I can add or copy anything in this table - there are no options. So I'm assuming this is usually auto updated by creating an entry in another table but I have no idea how to find where and can't find any documentation or other forum messages for this table.
    Has anyone else come accross this before or know anything about this table - has anyone else had trouble when wanting to allow E Wage Types to be used for Year End adjustments?
    Thanks in advance for any advice anyone can give me
    Nyree

    Olnly wt configured to be permissibled on a few infotypes (e.g. 0014, 0015, 0267) would need to be configured in V_T591B. The purpose of this is to control whether these wt are allowed to be changed after payroll is already run for the ee.
    All you need to do is maintain this entry through view V_T591B - add entry for wt 'E101'  for infotype 0015 / country '08'. The indicator (V5591B-ABWRU) can be '' (allow change to wt after proll is run), 'X' (warning if change after proll is run), 'E' (hard-error if change after payroll is run) .
    Rgds.

  • Make entries in table T095

    Hi all,
    Iam unable  to make entries in table T095, if i use through se11->utilitis then create entry option is disabled. if i use sm30 then it saying " The maintenance dialog for T095 is incomplete or not defined" please give me procedure to maintain the table t095.
    Thanks&Regards,
    RP

    Hi,
    T095 is a standard SAP table and you wont be allowed to insert or update entries in this table directly.
    If you have authorization for SPRO, you can update this table via Financial Accounting. Otherwise, you can ask your FI functional consultant to provide you with values in the table so that you are able to use these in your program.
    The last option would be to write a few lines of codes in an ABAP program and use "INSERT" or "UPDATE" ABAP statements to update this table. But avoid this option as inconsistencies may occur because of this.
    Hope it helps.

  • Entries in table BWOM_SETTINGS for PARAM_NAME = 'OBJSELSIZE '

    Hello All,
    The entries in table BWOM_SETTINGS for PARAM_NAME = 'OBJSELSIZE ' in our ECC system were as follows originally:
    OLTPSOURCE = ''
    PARAM_NAME = 'OBJSELSIZE '
    PARAM_VALUE = 'X'
    At that point we started using delta extarctor 0PM_OM_OPA_2 and it had a very poor performance.
    SAP asked us to implement note 1040072.
    As a result of applying that note, the BWOM_SETTINGS table has 2 entries for PARAM_NAME = OBJSELSIZE.
    1. OLTPSOURCE = ''
    PARAM_NAME = 'OBJSELSIZE '
    PARAM_VALUE = 'X'
    2. OLTPSOURCE = '0PM_OM_OPA_2'
    PARAM_NAME = 'OBJSELSIZE '
    PARAM_VALUE = 'X'
    Things were fine until we added more init selections to another CO extractor, 0CO_OM_OPA_6.
    0CO_OM_OPA_6 deltas were taking around 2 hours for original init selections:
    Fiscal year / period 2007001 2007012
    Fiscal year / period 2008001 2020012
    Controlling Area 3000
    Recently we added more init selections and now selections are :
    Fiscal year / period 2007001 2007012
    Fiscal year / period 2007001 2020012
    Fiscal year / period 2008001 2020012
    Controlling Area 3000
    Controlling Area 4000
    Controlling Area 5000
    The extraction is now taking unacceptably long time, about 15 hours.
    I am not sure if it is because adding more inits.
    I have a feeling the entries in BWOM_SETTINGS for OBJSELSIZE are incorrect.
    According to note 836740 should they be as below?
    OLTPSOURCE = '0CO_OM_OPA_6'
    PARAM_NAME = 'OBJSELSIZE '
    PARAM_VALUE = 'X'
    OLTPSOURCE = '0PM_OM_OPA_2'
    PARAM_NAME = 'OBJSELSIZE'
    PARAM_VALUE= 'X'"
    One more question. If we change the BWOM_SETTINGS entries to as above, will that affect other CO extractors?
    For instance, we use 0CO_OM_CCA_9 very widely and it runs very fast currently. I just want to make sure we dont mess up its performance by modifying the entries in BWOM_SETTINGS. May be add one more entry in BWOM_SETTINGS for 0CO_OM_CCA_9 too?
    Sorry about the lengthy post.
    Any help is greatly appreciated.
    Thank you.

    As stated in [OSS Note 836740 - Delta extractors CO: OBJSELSIZE DataSource specific|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=836740], there should be parameter OBJSELSIZE entries, with a value of X for the following CO DataSources:
    0CO_OM_CCA_9
    0CO_OM_OPA_6
    0CO_OM_ABC_7
    0CO_OM_WBS_6
    0CO_OM_NAE_2
    0CO_OM_NTW_2
    0OC_OM_NWA_2
    The independent entry, where the DataSource is blank, should also be prsent for the OBJSELSIZE parameter with a value of X. [OSS Note 1040072 - 0PM_OM_OPA_2: Poor performance|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1040072] shows that it's also needed for the 0PM_OM_OPA_2 DataSource.
    Your entries for 0CO_OM_OPA6 and 0PM_OM_OPA_2 are correct. You should add 0CO_OM_CCA_9 and any other DataSource in the list above. If they're not listed, they are supposed to be taken care of by the independent entry (DataSource is blank).

Maybe you are looking for