No inconsistency found for CCLM extractors

Dear colleagues,
I tried to configure scenario "Custom Code Management" and when I performed activities on step 6.2 Activate Extractors I received yellow message:
No inconsistency found for CCLM extractors
If I uncheck CCLM all are OK.
Could you please help me to resolve it?
Thanks a lot,
Alexander

Hi,
As Aneesh said, first Check the table T006 for the record for 'BOX' unit. If it is not there you have to do Replcation of Units from source system.
It does not affect the data existing in datatargets. It simply update the table T006.
Then after also check the table T006 for this record.
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

Similar Messages

SAP database tables - Column statistics not found for table in DB02 - During import, inconsistent tables were found - Some open conversion requests still exist in the ABAP dictionary.

Hi Experts,
I'm implementing SAP note 1990492 which requires manual implementation. Implementation includes modifying standard tables (i.e. append
the structure FIEU_S_APP_H to table FIEUD_FIDOC_H). After this I've adjusted the table in SE14 (Database Utility). I've done checks in SE14 and it shows the table is consistent.
But during DB02 -> Space folder -> Single table analysis -> Input table name -> Indexes tab -> Upon clicking statistics, there is a warning "Column statistics not found for table".
Our basis team is implementing an Add-On in the development system related to RWD Context Sensitive Help. They cannot proceed due to the following inconsistencies found in the table.
Screenshot error from the activity:
Screenshot from DB02:
I'm an ABAP developer and have no other ideas on what to do. Thanks in Advanced.

Hi All,
We were able to fix the issue through the following:
1. Call transaction
SE14.
2. Enter the name of
the table and choose "Edit".
3. Choose
"Indexes".
4. Select the index
and choose "Choose (F2)".
5. If you choose
"Activate and adjust", the system creates the index again and it is
consistent.
6. Check the object
log of this activation.
7. If an error
occurs, eliminate the cause and reactivate the index.

No SID found for value '0CURR' of characteristic 0CURRENCY

Hello dear friends
I am getting this above error message 'No SID found for value '0CURR' of characteristic 0CURRENCY' when i am trying to load data in my cube from an ODS.
For the Keyfigure that is using the currency i had to write the following routine in the Update Rule fo rthe Keyfigure:
DATA: l_MZPLP1 LIKE /BIC/PMMAT_PLNT-/BIC/MZPLP1,
l_MZPLP2 LIKE /BIC/PMMAT_PLNT-/BIC/MZPLP2.
SELECT SINGLE /BIC/MZPLP1
INTO l_MZPLP1
FROM /BIC/PMMAT_PLNT
WHERE
/BIC/Mplant = COMM_STRUCTURE-/bic/Mplant
AND
/bic/mmat_plnt = COMM_STRUCTURE-/BIC/MMATERIAL.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
RESULT = l_MZPLP1.
ENDIF.
result value of the unit
UNIT = '0CURRENCY' .
Also i checked the 'UNIT CALCULATION IN THE ROUTINE' box.
And under UNIT it does show 'Target Unit' - 'Currency Key'.
Please advise what should i do to resolve this.

hi Krrish,
the error message normally indicates the value is not exist in table currency/unit
Note 619987 - No SID for the 0UNIT or 0CURRENCY characteristic
you can try transfer unit and currency from r/3, rsa1-> source system->right click 'transfer global setting', mark 'currency' and 'unit of measurement' (fiscal year and factory calendar also) and option 'update tables' and execute.
you need to schedule this update, better daily before the transaction data load, to do this, from same screen go to menu program and schedule in background.
hope this helps.
Solution
If you do not find the value in the T006 or TCURC table, you must insert it. Note that the initial value is always allowed.
If you nevertheless receive this error message for the initial value, this means that there is an inconsistency in the SID table for the 0UNIT or 0CURRENCY characteristic. You can eliminate this inconsistency by calling the RSDMD_INITIAL_LINE_INSERT function module with I_CHABASNM = 0UNIT or 0CURRENCY.
If units are loaded in the external format, you must either convert these into the internal format in the transfer or update rules or change the extractor/file.The CONVERSION_EXIT_CUNIT_INPUT function module converts the external value of a unit into the internal value.

No SID found for value 'BOX ' of characteristic 0UNIT

Fellow masters,
I get a BRAIN 70 error - "No SID found for value 'BOX ' of characteristic 0UNIT "
Diagnosis
Characteristic value BOX does not exist in the master data table of characteristic 0UNIT. Therefore, this value could not be transformed int othe internal SID.
So, I made reference to SAP Note 619987.
If you do not find the value in the T006 or TCURC table, you must insert it. Note that the initial value is always allowed.
If you nevertheless receive this error message for the initial value, this means that there is an inconsistency in the SID table for the 0UNIT or 0CURRENCY characteristic. You can eliminate this inconsistency by calling the RSDMD_INITIAL_LINE_INSERT function module with I_CHABASNM = 0UNIT or 0CURRENCY.
If units are loaded in the external format, you must either convert these into the internal format in the transfer or update rules or change the extractor/file.The CONVERSION_EXIT_CUNIT_INPUT function module converts the external value of a unit into the internal value.
Could someone please explain to me how which option should I proceed with ?
I did an SE16 with table T006 but don`t seem to find 0UNIT

Hi,
As Aneesh said, first Check the table T006 for the record for 'BOX' unit. If it is not there you have to do Replcation of Units from source system.
It does not affect the data existing in datatargets. It simply update the table T006.
Then after also check the table T006 for this record.
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

No key field found for creation of DataSource - Classification Datasource

Hello,
While trying to create a clasiffication datasource based on 0PLANT_ATTR, when i assign a characteristic and push the DataSource button, i get the following message:
No key field found for creation of DataSource
Diagnosis
During generation of a classification or configuration DataSource, only those key fields for the object table (field "Obj.Tabelle") that are already present in the basis DataSource transferred to the extract structure. This is the case when none of the key fields of the object table were found in the structure of the basis DataSource.
System response
A DataSource cannot be created without key fields. The action was cancelled.
Procedure
Check whether you have selected the correct basis DataSource and object table. For more information, please see SAP Note 569849.
Do you know what can be the problem?
Thank you and regards

Hi Alberto,
plants are a special case. The key which is used for the classification
of plants (object type BETR) is not the same as the key which is used in
datasource 0PLANT_ATTR.
BETR has key LOCNR (Site). That's a customer related to a plant. The
customer number will be extracted in field LOCNR.
0PLANT_ATTR extracts the plant in its key field WERKS.
Transaction CTBW and the generic extraction program for classifications
don't know the relationship between LOCNR and WERKS. So they cannot map
them.
I do recommend a solution which would add the mapping between
LOCNR and WERKS:
1. Create please the classification datasource as intended, but use
datasource 0RT_LOC_MGR_ATTR as basis datasource. It's the only
datasource of the content where LOCNR is a key field. So
0RT_LOC_MGR_ATTR is used as a dummy here, to allow transaction CTBW to
create the classification datasource. It's not necessary to extract
data with datasource 0RT_LOC_MGR_ATTR.
2. Extend please the extract structure of the created classification
datasource. Add please field WERKS using component type WERKS_D. Make
this field visible.
3. Fill field WERKS in the extractor user exit EXIT_SAPLRSAP_002. WERKS
can be read from table KNA1 by using the customer number extracted to
LOCNR to select on field KNA1-KUNNR.
4. Transaction CTBW_META on the BW system isn't able to append the
characteristics from the classification datasource to infosource
0PLANT, because the keys are different. So create please a new info
source with CTBW_META. This allows CTBW_META to create the info objects
for the characteristics used in the classification datasource.
5. Add please the characteristics used in the classification datasource
to infosource 0PLANT manually. You will find the info object names of
the characteristics by looking up the characteristic datasources which
are assigned to the classification datasource in transaction CTBW. From
these names you can derive the info object names:
1CL_A... -> C_A...
6. Disconnect the infosource which has been created with CTBW_META from
the classification datasource.
7. Connect please the classification datasource to infosource 0PLANT
Use following info object:
info object   field
0PLANT       WERKS
The info object names for the characteristics are explained in step 5.
8. Add an infopackage to infosource 0PLANT for the classification
datasource.
Now the extraction of classifications of sites should work.
Best regards,
Rolf
P.S. I saw the system messed it up and doesn't display any new and empty lines. Sorry, I hope you still can read it.
Edited by: Rolf Doersam on Mar 26, 2010 6:56 PM

No Component found for the structure

Hi
I am getting the following error when extracted the delta upload into BI
No Component found for the structure for article 809875.
The extractor is 2LIS_02_SCL.
The following is the msg in the status bar.
Error message from the source system
Diagnosis
An error occurred in the source system.
System Response
Caller 09 contains an error message.
Further analysis:
The error occurred in Extractor .
Refer to the error message.
Procedure
How you remove the error depends on the error message.
Note
If the source system is a Client Workstation, then it is possible that the file that you wanted to load was being edited at the time of the data request. Make sure that the file is in the specified directory, that it is not being processed at the moment, and restart the request.
I have replicated and activated the datasource. But still i am getting this error. How to fix it.
Thanks
Annie

Hi Annie,
Activate ur datasource in source system and replicate and also activate in BI system.This is a time stamp problem.After activated try to run ur infopackage again.It should be fine now.
Regards
Chandu

Inconsistency Found in segment E101CI_EEW_CUSTOMER_H.

Hi Experts,
We have a IDOC in development system CRM 4.0 created by BDFG, in that IDOC in the segment 'E101CRMXIF_CUSTOMER_H' there is a CHILD segment Z101CI_EEW_CUSTOMER_H with Z fields. it is generating/regenerating without any Inconsistency.
We have those fields in the Structure "CRMXIF_BUSTRANS" in "CRMXIF_CUSTOMER_H" i CRM 4.0 & as well as in CRM 7.0. These fields are nadded using EEWB.
The system upgraded to CRM 7.0 & the idoc is moved from CRM 4.0 to CRM 7.0, When we regenerate this IDOC in CRM 7.0 with new fields for some other segment it give me this message:
Inconsistency Found in segment:
Segment E101CI_EEW_CUSTOMER_H
Structure CI_EEW_CUSTOMER_H
"Ignore Inconsistency & continue(SAP Note 573251)"
"Remove Inconsistency & continue(SAP Note 568874)"
"Cancel Generation"
I opted "Ignore Inconsistency & continue(SAP Note 573251)",
We saw that the segment 'Z101CI_EEW_CUSTOMER_H' was not generated in CRM 7.0 as it did in CRM 4.0 but a new segment generated 'E101CI_EEW_CUSTOMER_H' with 2 fields which don't even exists in "CRMXIF_BUSTRANS".
If i opted the second option it gives me this message:
Name Range Violation: Name E101CI_EEW_CUSTOMER_H not permitted in customer system.
Project will go live next month & we are stuck in Data migration issue due to this IDOC error.
Waiting for a quick response.
Thanks,
D_marco.
Edited by: d_marco on Mar 23, 2011 7:37 PM

Hi,
While doing PGR at VL32N, we are facing this error. Can someone assist.
Regards,
Aruna

No CTS projects found for "project TEST"

Hi Experts, I´m configuring the Change Request Managment for Solman 7.0 SP16, but when I execute the check report (/tmwflow/charmchk) appear the following issues:
Check consistency of "project TEST"
    --> No CTS projects found for "project TEST"
When I execute de logistic report (/tmwflow/proj) I view that:
- the "Project Structure" status is green and I can view that the Cycle is active and CTS Project is assigned.
- The "CTS Status Switches" status is green and I can view the status of my project TEST.
When I create the IMG Project, the logistic report was in red, but applied the notes:
      1158885 Maintenance cycle/project cycle cannot be completed
      1163568 No completion of task list; CTS project active
And the status was changed to green, but the charm check said No CTS projects found for "project TEST"
Any idea to solve that?
Regards,
Sergio.

Hi,
933705 - Closing inconsistent project cycles
This note will help you to delete inconsistent cycle.
Hope it helps you to solve your problem
Note this note is release independent
Regards
Prakhar
Edited by: Prakhar Saxena on Mar 2, 2009 12:08 PM

Looking for an extractor.

Hi All. I'm looking for an extractor for the following fields:
COSP-WTG001 to COSP-WTG016
COSP-WOG001 to COSP-WOG016
COSP-WKG001 to COSP-WKG016
Is there an way to trck this down?.
I have already found extractors
0CO_OM_CCA_1
0CO_OM_CCA_2
0CO_OM_CCA_9
These extractors extract some data from COSP table but no the fields I need.
Is there a way to find out if there is any standard extractor for the fields above?
Regards, Mauro.

check the table ROOSFIELD
but i think you'll have to create generic extractor for the same... as all these field are for value in different currency

Delta field for LO Extractor Datasources

Hi All,
Can anyone tell me how to find the delta field for LO Extractor. Because currently i am facing some problem in Delta like, if i do any changes in sales order in Item Level those changes are not reflected in RSA7. And the next change if i do it in header level i cld see the change along with my previos change being displayed. Problem is i dont find as seperate record for my changes in ITEM level.
Ex. x 3040404 001 oooo ppppp oooo hhhh kkkk
3040404 001 oooo bbbbb oooo hhhh kkkk - this is for header level chnage
Item level chnage: Not shown as seperate records
Next header change displayed properly as above.
Pls advise me this is a very urgent issue.
Thanks.
Bhu.

Hi Nagesh,
Thanks for your reply.
Onething to tell is i am handling diff clients. All my clients r using 3.5 except this client. Very Unfortunate. They r using 2.1c. Its long back i used this version
In LBWE i found they have only one update type i.e V3 update.
I have checked SM13 also. There is one update records for each change in header level data. Also this time i found when i change Route i found one update record. But not when i change Schedule line date.
Pls let me know if u need any further info. Anyideas welcome.
Cheers!
Bhuvana.

Idoc error - inconsistency rate for currency..

Dear Experts,
When running WE02, I found idoc error message : inconsistency rate for currency..Diagnosis : The items in an accounting document have been provided with at least two exchange rates for currency. Actually, for this error I asked my client to update the data manually into SAP since the Act doc is created.
My question is : Could I coorect this error to prevent the same error arises in the future? After checked, in each idocs which contain the error, they have 2 exchanges rates. How the system caould be detected only one currency?
Please advice.
Thank you.

Hi Puri,
your IDOC when generated, pick up the details from the Line item in the billing.
check the Copy controls on the billing, if the exchagne rate for both the line items are different or not.

Item cost not found for one or more items - Inventory Posting

Good Day Mentors,
My user has encountered an error during Inventory Posting and its "Item cost not found for one or more items".
The specific Message ID from SAP's System Message Log is 10001287.
I found a similar post which addresses this error here.
But unfortunately it did not help me solve my user's problem.
I already checked if the items had a defined "Item Cost" in the Item Master Data Inventory Tab, and they all have "Item Cost" defined.
I'm not sure if this will help, but below is the Inventory Audit Report of one of the items that is throwing the "Item cost not found" error.
I am not a business consultant neither am I literate in accounting, so thanks for the patience.
SAP Version: 9.0 PL5
Valuation Method: Moving Average
Thanks in advance!
Sean

Hi Augusto and Raviraj,
I've already verified in our production database the points you made:
- Is the "Manage Item cost per warehouse" selected in the Basic Initialization Screen?
YES
- Is the "Manage Inventory by Warehouse" ticked/checked in the "Inventory Data" tab of the "Item Master Data" screen?
YES
* I apologize for not have been able to give this information upfront.
Anyway, the database only has one warehouse at the moment.
I've checked the items, like the item in the screen shot above, and it does have an item cost.
Below is the screenshot of the sample item from my original post,
Thanks in advance!
Sean

Error -Account 'Down-payments clearing account' could not be found for area

When I am trying to pass a down payment entry by debiting vedor and crediting bank with asset it is giving an error as follows.
Account 'Down-payments clearing account' could not be found for area 01
Message no. AU133
Please help me to rectify the same.
Thanks in advance
Deepak

HI
Please pay attention at the possible causes of message AU133:
1. Error AU133:
   a) You have not defined a contra account for acquisition value postings in the Asset Accounting Customizing settings (Transaction AO90).However, this is required as of Release 4.6C because, as is the case for all other integration postings in Asset Accounting, invoice receipt postings have to be displayed in Asset Accounting via the new posting kernel to ensure an identical document
structure.
   b) You have defined the account in Asset Accounting, however, it is not created in the affected company code.Check whether the account is correct and create it for the company code, if necessary.
2. You have entered an asset reconciliation account for the "Contra account: Acquisition value posting" (for example, the same account as for   "Acquisition:Acquis. and production costs" account).This is not permitted.Check whether your account determination is correct
   (Transaction AO90) in Asset Accounting Customizing. The same applies
   for the 'Contra account: Down payment posting'.
3. As "Contra account: Acquisition value posting" you entered an asset G/L account. If necessary change the automatic posting indicator in the G/L account master record.
4.Check if you need revaluation accounts in depreciation areas involved   (AO90):
-Revaluation acquis. and production costs
-Offsetting account: Revaluation APC
Please run also programm RACKONTO where missing or wrong customizing
the accoutn determinations per company code is displayed
Also have a look at note 7595 in this regard.
Please assign points if it useful.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni

KB15N_No adjustment account found for cost element Message no. K5112

When I am trying to post Manual Cost Allocation through TC KB15N with the following input data I am getting the following error message and the same could not be posted. Kindly advise.
Screen Variant used: 01 SAP Cost Center
Input Type: List Entry
Item No.1
Sender Cost Center : 3402100942
Cost Element: 6200001
Amount : 62,201.56
Receiving Cost Center: 3405100945
First four digits represent profit center code. If first four digits are equal the above error is not coming. But posting is needed with different profit centers.
No adjustment account found for cost element
Message no. K5112
Diagnosis
Neither standard account determination nor the enhanced function found an adjustment account for the reconciliation posting.
System Response
No adjustment account could be determined for cost element in company code SCCL.
Procedure
Maintain the standard or enhanced account determination for transaction KAMV. Information on maintenance can be found in the program documentation.
Execute

Hi all,
I face the issue like this but with transaction KOAP - Plan settlement
But, the problem is that, I do not active reconciliation ledger, so I do not maintain any thing relate to reconciation ledger or adjustment posting? I can do transaction "actual settlement" without error
So, How this error come to me?
And how I can fix it?
Thanks all!

No Adjustment account found for cost element

Dear Gurus,
I am getting Three errors msg "No Adjustment account found for cost element" when i try to run the conformation of production order create ( T Code : C015 )" and I am not able to save the record . like
1 ).No adjustment account found for cost element
Message no. K5112
Diagnosis
Neither standard account determination nor the enhanced function found an adjustment account for the reconciliation posting.
System Response
No adjustment account could be determined for cost element in company code XXXX
Procedure
Maintain the standard or enhanced account determination. Information on maintenance can be found in the program documentation.
Execute
2) . No adjustment account found for cost element XXXXXXXX
Message no. K5112
Diagnosis
Neither standard account determination nor the enhanced function found an adjustment account for the reconciliation posting.
System Response
No adjustment account could be determined for cost element XXXXXXX in company code XXXX.
Procedure
Maintain the standard or enhanced account determination. Information on maintenance can be found in the program documentation.
Execute
3 ) No account is specified in item 0000000002
Message no. F5670
Diagnosis
No account was specified for account type "S" in item "0000000002" of the FI/CO document.
System Response
The Financial Accounting program cannot process the document.
Procedure
A system error has probably occurred in the application you called up. Check the data transferred to item "0000000002" of the FI/CO document.
Could anyone please help me with this.
Regards
SAP CO

Hi,
iam not able to understand of this SAP Notes: 531606 and 1027645
Could you pl give me full details for come out this problem.
Regards
SAP CO

No inconsistency found for CCLM extractors

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for