No internet access for multiple users

I have tried setting up an account for the kids but it will not display Safari. I have tried both limited and unlimited access options but there is a question mark where Safari should be in the dock. Any ideas? thanks
Message was edited by: 911golfer

The icons in the doc are really shortcuts/aliases to the real program or file.
The "?" means the system cannot find the target file.
Typically happens if the target file has been renamed or moved.
In the kid account, drag the "?" from the Dock to the desktop. It will disappear in a puff of smoke.
Verify Safari is not running.
Open the Applications folder.
Locate Safari.
Drag the Safari icon to the dock.
If security on the kid account is set to allow them to modify the Dock, the Safari icon should stay in the dock where ever you placed it.
If security is set to disallow dock modification, it will not allow you to put the icon thin the dock.

Similar Messages

File accessability for multiple users

I am designing a we application in which each and every updation done by the users will be written in a text file. I have a question that since this is a web based application there will be multiple users accessing the application. And when many users are trying to update a record then they will be accessing the same file.i.e., writing into the same file at the same time and that will be a problem... Please suggest me a solution for this issue.... Some people suggested to use synchronized methods for writing and some suggested like writing into a temporary file and then once the user has finished updating we have to write from the temporary file to the main text file. So the main file is not directly updated by the users..
Please suggest me if you have any new ideas...Thanks in advance..

Hi Thanks for your explanation...Since I am new to this field i have a doubt. Could you please explain it.
Question:
Will Session affect this logic?
Consider a user A is performing the update action at location 1 and a user B is performing another update action at location 2. My doubt here is will both the updated records will be present in the same Vector even if the users closes the session? Because what if the user closes the application before the "WorkerThread" runs method "performNextUpdate()". And also will the thread start running from the moment the user logs into the application for every 25ms.
Sorry if it is a silly question or if you dont understand it properly.

ITunes access for multiple users on the same Apple

I think I'm really done myself in for the fist time with my iMac. I have decided instead of sharing a single log-in with my girlfriend, to get her her own. This is working out great, but I'm come to a halt in trying to get her access to our music on iTunes. I read the article on the Apple Support website that clearly explains how to do this, I also read Kay and Bert's message thread which I thought would be of help to no avail.
I've copied my iTunes folder into user/shared then opened iTunes/preferences and connected iTunes the path to the new location. Done... but I can't see any of my music!! ... and I can't even see the music under my log-in. However, I can clearly see the files there in the user/shared folder. I'm starting to feel those "windows" days before I found Apple. Please help!
iMac G5 Mac OS X (10.4.6) iLife 06

I got my answers looking at another post. This individual was able to hit up a Genious Bar, something I had tried to schedule on the internet but was denied because I don't have the care plan. Here is the thread.
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=2538248#2538248
Again, the Apple Discussion has saved the day.

Non-profit looking to purchase creative suite for multiple users

Hi! I am representing a non-profit who is interested in purchasing the creative suite to be accessed for multiple users. Can someone direct me with how to do that? Thanks.Non-profit looking to purchase

Start here:
Adobe nonprofit eligibility qualifications| Adobe Volume Licensing

How to provide access to multiple users connected to a Dumb switch? (multi-auth/multi-domain)

Good morning everybody,
I am writing on behalf of not being able to implement a desired outcome in our company network. In fact the situation is as follows:
What I want to do is to be able to authenticate users (802.1x authentication) in our company radius server and authorize them access by having a dynamic VLAN assignment in a multi-user environment on one and the same port of a Cisco 2960 switch. So far, the authentication and authorization has been working completely smoothly (there are no problems with itself). The concept involves the configuration of both DATA and VOICE VLANs as I there is also phone authentication implemented. In order to simulate this environment I introduce a Dumb switch connected to my Cisco 2960 Catalyst.
What I have successfully managed to get to work so far is this:
1) On one switch port I have tried the “authentication host-mode multi-domain” and it worked perfectly for a PC behind a telephone, or with one PC connected to a the dumb switch + the telephone connected to another port of the dumb switch. Logically it is the same situation as there is a separation in two domains – DATA and VOICE. Bellow is an output from show authentication sessions for this scenario.
Interface MAC Address Method Domain Status Session ID
Fa0/23 0021.9b62.b79b dot1x DATA Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F3008E (user1)
Fa0/23 0015.655c.b912 dot1x VOICE Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F9009F (phone)
2) On the other hand, when I try the same scenario with the “authentication host-mode multi-auth”, the switch still separates the traffic in two domains and is able to authenticate all users, AS LONG AS they are in the same VLAN.
show authentication sessions:
Interface MAC Address Method Domain Status Session ID
Fa0/23 0021.9b62.b79b dot1x DATA Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F3008E (user1)
Fa0/23 b888.e3eb.ebac dot1x DATA Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F8008C (user2)
Fa0/23 0015.655c.b912 dot1x VOICE Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F9009F (phone)
However, I cannot succeed authentication of many users from DIFFERENT VLANs, neither in multi-auth nor in multi-domain modes.
What I want to get is an output like this:
Interface MAC Address Method Domain Status Session ID
Fa0/23 0021.9b62.b79b dot1x DATA Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F3008E (user1)
Fa0/23 b888.e3eb.ebac dot1x DATA Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F8008C (user2)
Fa0/23 0015.655c.b912 dot1x VOICE Authz Success C0A8FF69000000F9009F (phone)
I want the switch to authenticate the users anytime they connect to itself and for them to have an instant access to the network. (I tell this because I tried scenario 1) with multi-domain mode and authentication violation replace, and it worked but, two users never had access to the “Internet” simultaneously!!!
The configuration of the interface connected to the Dumb switch is as follows.
interface FastEthernet0/x
description Connection to DUMBswitch
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan XXX
switchport port-security maximum 10
switchport port-security
switchport port-security violation protect
authentication host-mode multi-auth
authentication priority dot1x
authentication port-control auto
authentication timer reauthenticate 4000
authentication violation replace
dot1x pae authenticator
dot1x timeout tx-period 10
spanning-tree portfast
The way I see it is explained in the following steps:
- PC1 connects to the Dumb switch. This causes the Cisco switch to authenticate user1. This creates an auth. session with its MAC address linked to a domain DATA.
- When PC2 connects to the Dumb switch, this causes the violation replace which replaces the recent authenticated MAC address with the MAC of PC2. I would like it once authenticated to appear in the authentication sessions with a link to a new DATA domain linked to the VLAN assigned from the RADIUS server.
Is this possible? I think (in theory) this is the only way to provide authenticated access to multiple users connecting through Dumb switch to the network.
Has anybody ever succeeded in such a configuration example and if yes, I would be love to get some help in doing so?
Thank you
Stoimen Hristov

Hi Stoimen,
I have done a setup similar to yours with the only exception being VLAN assignment. When I used dACLs only, it makes things somewhat easier as the VLAN no longer matters. Remember that the switchport is in access mode and will only allow a single VLAN across it (with the exception of the voice VLAN). I think that is the real cause of your problem.
From what I can see, you have 2 options available to you:
1) Use dACLs instead of VLAN assignment. This means that an access list will be downloaded from the radius server straight to the authenticated user's session. I have tested this and it works perfectly. Just Google Cisco IBNS quick reference guide and look for the section that deals with Low Impact mode.
2) Get rid of the dumb switches and use managed switches throughout your network. Dumb switches will always be a point of weakness in your network because they have no intelligence to do advanced security features like port security, 802.1x, DHCP snooping, etc.
Hopefully someone else will chime in with another option.
Xavier

How to use the same POWL query for multiple users

Hello,
I have defined a POWL query which executes properly. But if I map the same POWL query to 2 portal users and the 2 portal users try to access the same page simultaneously then it gives an error message to one of the users that
"Query 'ABC' is already open in another session."
where 'ABC' is the query name.
Can you please tell me how to use the same POWL query for multiple users ?
A fast reply would be highly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Sandhya

Batch processing usually involves using actions you have recorded. In Action you can insert Path that can be used during processing documents. Path have some size so you may want to only process document that have the same size. Look in the Actions Palette fly-out menu for insert path. It inserts|records the current document work path into the action being worked on and when the action is played it inserts the path into the document as the current work path..

Setting up accounts for multiple users

Suggestions for allowing multiple users to access one account to avoid having to reimburse folks for every download on their work iPads?

short answer, no. Mail.app does not have support within itself for multiple user accounts. It displays the messages from the mailboxes of the user that is currently logged in. so if you want multiple people to read their mail on the same mac without being able to read other users' mail, you will need to set up multiple user accounts. alternatively, use another client. i think thunderbird supports multiple mail accounts under the same user account. hope this helps.

Is there a way for multiple users to connect to my home sharing with their iOS device to select music to stream to my A/V receiver jukebox style?

I have an A/V receiver that I can connect to and select music to stream over my network but I want to know if I have a party if it's possible for multiple users to have access on their own devices to my home shared music and select music to play like a jukebox.

I almost forgot that using folders can allow each folder to contain a song. I also recall touch tracks or one key play...

How can I create a folders of apps for multiple users?

I use several iPads with my students and would like to set up a folder for each student. I want to place "an alias" of each app the student uses in their folder. On my Mac, I can "make alias" and place aliases in seperate folders. How can I do that on my iPad? Thanks!

You can drag one app on top of another and make a folder. However the limit to this is, for your situation, there can be no sharing of apps....the app Fred can only be in one folder because it's only on the device once. (so it may not work for what you need)
and I cannot recall if you can edit the name of the folder.
Unfortunately, for situations like yours, the iPad was created to be a single user device, so there's really not support for multiple users or multiple levels of access.

GRC 10: Initial password for multiple users creation in a ARQ request???

Hi All,
I was trying to create a request in ARQ for multiple users. I noticed that, I could add all the necessary required information for multiple users using the template. I added the roles as well. However, I could not set the initial password for multiple users as the tab "User System Details" (where the initial password is provided for a single user) is disabled!!!
The users were successfully created in the R/3 system. However, due to non-availability of initial password, these users could not log into the R/3 system.
May I know how to set the initial password for multiple users?
Regards,
faisal

Vit,
I was trying to test this multiple user creation scenario. But I am surprise to get a template where in I have only below mentioned fields:
1. User Name
2. User Id
3. Email
I filled these details and uploaded. Then filled the "User Access" details. While submitting the request, I got the error:
"Last name is not mentioned for user id XXX"
But there is not such column in provided template by GRC!
I added 2 columns: First Name and Last Name and saved it and uploaded again. These details are not picked up!
Following are the only columns shown:
1. User Name
2. User Id
3. Email
4. Manager
Out of above, only "Manager" field is editable and others are disabled.
Last time I remember, I has got complete template with all the columns. Unfortunately, I have deleted it and not available with me now.
Any idea you have why am I getting such incomplete template?
Regards,
faisal

SESSION VARIABLES : HOW TO TEST FOR MULTIPLE USERS

I have a username session variable set up on a localhost testing envirnoment.
This works fine for one user, but when I open another occurence of the browser (or just another tab) to test for multiple users the system overwrites the session variable with the last username input.
So the question is:
Why doesn't dreamweaver hold an instance of the session variable for each browser session? and if not what are your suggestions?
Thanks
Adam.

Thanks for that.
After scouring the internet I found the only way of running 2 instances of firefox without them sharing the session variables is to create 2 new firefox profiles in windows + set the MOZ_NO_REMOTE environment variable.
Internet explorer is much easier as it has a 'new session' option in the file menu, but seems to have more trouble displaying tables correctly.
Hope this helps anyone with a similar problem.

Change Reference Attribute - "Manager" for multiple users

Hi,
I have a scenario in which I have to create a workflow to change a reference value attribute - "Manager" for multiple users in one go. Is it possible to achieve this with workflow. If yes, then how?
Regards,
Manuj Khurana

Hello,
not out of the box, since in workflows and custom activities you can only access the reqestor and target object direcly.
But you can develop your own custom activity that fits you need, or do it with powershell custom activity.
I did a very similar thing, to be able to change users group membership from the user UI, so I have also edit objects other then requestor and target in a workflow.
Since both (manager and member) are reference attributes you maybe find this article helpful:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/19615.fim-2010-r2-how-to-manage-group-membership-from-the-user-ui.aspx
I used this powershell activity in my solution:
http://fimpowershellwf.codeplex.com/
Regards
Peter
Peter Stapf - ExpertCircle GmbH - My blog:
JustIDM.wordpress.com

Design forms for multiple users

Dear sir
I am developing new application for my company.I don't know how to desing the the tables for multiple users and how to give rights to users to access certain forms.This application will use in two differnet languages.
how to switch one language to other languages
give me some ideas
thanks
Dev

...how to desing the the tables for multiple users and how to give rights to users to access certain forms.
There are several ways to do this. One way is to create different database accounts for each user, and give each user priviledges to the tables they need. (Your DBA may need to do this.) Then, when the users logs in, check who it is and call the appropriate form.
how to switch one language to other languages
This is a common question. See Experts Experience Required: Direction In 10g or search the forum for additional help.

Table data getting locked for multiple user for a Z-table updation after EH4 to EHP6 Upgrade

Hi,
We have one new upgraded system at EHP6, earlier system was at EH4 where multiple user can Run one Z T-code and can edit the entries for the Z-table.
This Z-Tcode is calling SM30 internally for updating the Z-Table.
Now in the upgraded system, when one user is into the transation code, and other user runs that T-code, systems throws a POP-UP mesg saying that the data is locked and can be displayed only(can not be edited).
I have debugged the code in both the environment and found that there is one statement Call C_ENQUEUE ID < > field. for which the Sy_Subrc is coming as 2 in the upgraded system which is causing the issue, where as the sy-subrc is 0 in the system at EH4 level.
Can any body tell me why this Z-tcode is not allowing to be accessed by multiple user at same time for Editing(updating the table) .
Regards,
Archana Jha

Hi,
When you create the lock object you can define the keys.
and then you can use those in the ENQUEUE function.
Regards.
regards.

Is there a way to have internet access for my laptop through Verizon? I have a smartphone, but I don't want to rack up too much data.

Is there a way to have internet access for my laptop through Verizon? I have a smartphone, but I don't want to rack up too much data. How would the laptop connect to the 4G? network? Thanks for any info:)

Rcshnoor nailed it, everything will depend on how they manage their data connection once the laptop is connected. It is perfectly feasible that they will have no issues with this new connection. However, there is nothing stopping the user from going above and beyond the data usage cap currently sufficient for the phone by itself. We cannot presume that any estimations on new usage will be accurate either.
Users should always be aware of the reality that revolves around data usage and the devices that consume them. Its no different than installing a 2nd waterline/hose on your house. Sure the hose will be fine if you remember to turn it off when you are done, but no one is going to stop you from letting it run all night if you forget.

No internet access for multiple users

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for