No lens data under dpp 3.13.0

hi, I recently updated to DPP 3.13.0 and all of the lens data that I had brought in under the previous version has disappeared. If I try to update the lens data the application retuns the error can't connect to server. Under the previous version of DPP I was able to connect and download the lens data. Is anyone else having this problem? I'm running on mac os 10.7.5

Kernel 3.13.7 contains the patch to fix this bug, from here on the mailing list: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/20/819
So now I don't have to hold back my kernel anymore, and this issue is resolved. Woopee!
Last edited by zanny (2014-03-27 02:03:59)

Similar Messages

Cyber Duck killed my Canon DPP Lens Data Downloads?

I run a programme called DPP, Digital Photo Professional, which was working fine and I was able to download 'lens data' for this program.
I then tried out Cyber Duck for some FTP transfers which went OK on my MBP.
But now I find that although Mail and Safari work fine, the data download for DPP no longer works, all I get is 'unable to connect to server'.
My MacMini has a copy of DPP on it and that is still able to download lens data, but I have not run Cyber Duck on that machine as yet.
Even if I reinstall DPP it remains the same reporting 'unable to connect to server'.
I tried contacting Cyber Duck who just bumped me off as it was a 'third party problem', which was not particularly very helpful of them.
So I am now at a loss what to do.
It would seem to point to something that may have been altered by using Cyber Duck, but what I do not know. All the internet connections seem to be correct as far as I can tell.
Anyone have any idea what could have been changed to give me this problem?
Many thanks for any help.

I rolled my system back to a clone that I made before I downloaded and used Cyberduck.
DPP is now able to download its Lens Data. So it would appear that Cyberduck does alter something which breaks DPP and stops it from connecting to the Lens Data server.

How do I enable "Data under cursor"?

Hi all,
I just started playing around with the new Au CS6, like it a lot so far! I've had good luck getting all the little tweaks I liked from Au 3 working except this one small thing which to many may seem unnecessary, but I have found to be very useful in specific instances.
Using Au 3, in the status bar at the bottom of the screen there are various data displayed such as 'Sample Format', 'File Size', 'Free Space', and the one I am struggling to find in CS6, 'Data Under Cursor'. With this, anywhere I placed the cursor on a spectrogram I might be looking at in Au it will give me the readout of exact Hz value at that spot in the status bar (for example: -21.6 dB @ 1:22:021, 1362Hz). I cannot find how to turn on or view this datum in CS6. If there's someone out there who knows if I can still do this in the new version, or a workaround I could use to get something similar in Au CS6, I'd love to hear about it.
Thank you!
-Melissa

I got it working since, I had to go into the rte player app and enable cellular streaming there. It wasn't anywhere in general settings where I was initially looking. Thanks anyway.

Lens data from Exif

This is a question that was raised in the Lightroom Forum, but I think it might fit better in here. In Lightroom there is an option to sort images with respect to lens used, a very neat function, but when using raw files from Minolta (.mrw) or DNG's converted from these, no lens data is provided. The only information in there is "Unknown lens". Can this be fixed?

Dana Gartenlaub wrote:
> In File Info, Camera Data 1 lists any lens that is recent enough
> to communicate its identity to the camera. This works on Pentax
> PEFs or DNGs even when run through the DNG converter.
It may work this way with Pentax PEF files but unfortunately doesn't with Minolta MRW or Sony ARW files. Of course, Minolta AF (and now Sony Alpha) lenses do report their identities to the camera, and the camera does write this info into the EXIF data but it ends up as an obscure lens ID in the Minolta (or Sony) Maker Notes where most 3rd-party software (including Adobe's) cannot (or would not) access it.
Eric DeSilva wrote:
> Adobe apps will store it in XMP format, but all the makernote
> EXIF data is gone.
This is not true! Adobe XMP won't read the Maker Notes sections but it does preserve them. When I convert an MRW file to DNG (with Adobe DNG Converter) and then create a TIFF or JPEG file from the DNG (with Camera Raw) then the Minolta Maker Notes will still be present in the final TIFF or JPEG file (and of course in the DNG file, too).
Thomas Knoll wrote:
> The problem of the lens data for Minolta/Sony cameras is the
> lens ID codes have lots and lots of overlaps. Mostly because
> Sigma released lenses that duplicate lots of the Minolta lenses
> ID codes.
Sigma lenses don't have Minolta/Sony lens IDs but just random numbers. Kindly ignore what Sigma lenses do. And please don't bother which lens 'was really used.' Just provide us with the lens ID found in the EXIF Minolta/Sony Maker Notes data. Please!
By the way, is there a way to access the Minolta Maker Note LensID tag (or any tag) in the EXIF data through the JavaScript API? If not then please add one!
Currently, I enter the names of the Minolta/Sony lenses manually into the metadata. I customized my File Info Panel 'Camera Data 1' so I can enter the data there in a fairly comfortable way. This is not too hard to do because usually I am using no more than two or three different lenses per assignment usually. This way, the lens names go into the exif/1.0/aux tag named 'Lens.' Unfortunatey, due to a bug in Bridge or in XMP, raw files and DNG files won't accept changes in this and a few more tags; only TIFF and JPEG files will. Instead, the change will get stored in Bridge's cache only. So I wrote a Bridge script to manipulate the XMP sidecar files' contents directly, to 'burn' the changes from the volatile cache permanently into the disk files' metadata.
All this would become *much* easier when 1) we had access to the lens ID in the Minolta (or Sony) Maker Notes and 2) someone would eventually care about fixing that $#!+ metadata bug in Bridge (or XMP) which was already there in Bridge 1.0 and still is around in Bridge 2.1.
-- Olaf

In using Office Mac 2011 I noticed that there is 3 gigs of data under Documents/Microsoft User data for Message Sources. Anyone know what this is and if it can be deleted?

In using Office Mac 2011 I noticed that there is 3 gigs of data under Documents/Microsoft User Data for meassage sorces. Does anyone know what these files are and can they be deleted?

Hi SDP1,
Do you use Outlook or Entourage? If so, that's where all of your emails are stored. If you don't use either of those applications I'd go digging through the folders and see where all the space is tied up. Check the Identifies folders, that's probably where everything is located.

How can i find the tables which dont contain any data under my database ?

Can you please suggest me a way to find the tables which dont contain any data under my database ?
Regards,
Renu

Can you please suggest me a way to find the tables which dont contain any data under my database ?
For the schema that you've logged in to, you could do something like this:
test@XE>
test@XE> @test
test@XE> --
test@XE> set serveroutput on size 1000000
test@XE>
test@XE> declare
2    n_count number;
3 begin
4    for rec in (select object_name from user_objects
5                where object_type = 'TABLE')
6    loop
7      execute immediate 'select count(*) from '||rec.object_name
8      into n_count;
9      if (n_count = 0) then
10        dbms_output.put_line(rec.object_name);
11      end if;
12    end loop;
13 end;
14 /
BONUS
RUN_STATS
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
test@XE>
test@XE>For the other schemas, you could query from dba_objects and probably display the owner as well.
HTH
isotope

How can we showup the GL date under iprocurement distribution lines?

Hi,
I am not able to find the GL Date under the iProcurement Distribution lines, i think we can show the GL DATE using the personalization. Can any one help how to do the personalization..?
Note: We are using the 11.5.10.2 version.
Please update me ASAP..we need to fix this issue Urgentlry.
Regards,
Kv.

Hi Gaurav,
Thanks for your reply.....
i have checked the Column Header fields for GL Date.
Please check the belwo information and suggest me accrodingly how to enable the GL Date. Plz respond ASAP..
============================================================
Scope Region: /oracle/apps/icx/por/req/webui/CheckoutLinesPG.AccountsLinesR, Document Name /oracle/apps/icx/por/req/webui/CheckoutLinesPG
=============================================================
Column Header—
Sortable Header: Charge Account
Column: (GL DateCol)
Message Text Input: (GL Date)
Message Styled Text: (GLDateMultiple)
--Column Header
Sortable Header: GL Date
Note: All the above fields are marked yes under the Shown field in the personalize page.
From the above shown GL Date columns what are the suitable options under the personalize page to enable GL Date..
Please respond ASAP, as it is very urgent for me..........
Regards,
Kv
Edited by: Peter.Kv on Sep 8, 2009 12:23 AM
Edited by: Peter.Kv on Sep 8, 2009 12:26 AM

When I remove all website data under settings safari advanced website data, it comes back a day later. How do I fix this?, When I remove all website data under settings safari advanced website data, it comes back a day later. How do I fix this?

When I remove all website data under settings>safari>advanced>website data (remove all), the websites reappear when i check a day later. How do I stop this?

HI,
Wow you must have been watching me type and hit send since it took about 1 minute for the reply. Thanks.
Yes i understand the purpose however i still feel as though i should be able to decide for myself if i want to use them as an "option" or turn them off entirely. It's sort of akin to the "trash bin" that's not really trash, though in that instance at least microsoft and Apple listened to consumers (eventally) and allowed users to make the choice. Hey there's a thought how about Apple points the delete to the trash bin and looses the annoying popup, that way we can restore cookies? Sorry, i'm being sarcastic but in my view, if i delete a cookie or a cached web icon it's not exactly the same thing as "saving us" from deleting a spreadsheet or system files. Oh but wait in that instance i CAN delete them without having to endure the annoying "are you sure" pop up. it looks like someone missed the bus on this one. Thanks again I'll check the web for the terminal command and try and edit the tag myself.

Panasonic G1 lens data in LR 2.2

It appears that LR 2.2 does not recognize lens data as encoded by the Panasonic G1, including that for the Lumix kit lenses. Looking at the RW2 files, I can't find any lens model data at all. The JPEGs do carry lens model information, but perhaps it is in some non-standard format?
So, the questions:
Does anyone know for sure that lens data is not encoded in RW2 files by the G1, including in some proprietary way?
Does anyone know if the JPEG lens data from the G1 is in some way non-standard?
Does anyone know if LR will be able to handle such lens data as may be present in either type of file in the future?
Perhaps it would be possible to re-encode the data from the JPEGs in some way that LR can use it?
Thanks -
Tim

I don't like it either that Adobe chooses only to handle certain camera brands lens data. It doesn't properly recognize lenses on my Olympus E620 either. Sometimes it will include something about the lens, but that's not the real lens name, it has picked it up from other fields in the metadata. Yes, you can pre-process the jpg files (and probably RAW too) to put the lens information in a place that Lightroom picks up.
I also discovered that the Panasonic G1 and the Olympus E620 do not call the same lens by the same name, so at the same time I standardized the names for me so if the 70-300mm lens is on either camera, it shows up as the same lens.
And the process is not so bad because now I'm merging GPS data into the files, as well as filling out the location fields automatically from the GPS data, so I am now doing a whole lot of pre-processing.
Panasonic and Olympus put the lens name in the field LensType. If you put text in XMP:Lens field then Lightroom picks it up.
You can use exiftool in Windows at least to do this. You would need something like this one line to copy the information frothe LensType field to the XMP:LENS field. Mine is more complicated because I put the lens name in explicitly.
exiftool -overwrite_original "-xmp:lens<${LensType}" *.jpg
I thought there was a LR plugin that would allow you to execute a command on import, but I don't see it now.
Judy

Lens Data

When Pentax updated its firmware for the K10D to version 1.1, the raw files (PEF or DNG) changed in some way where LR no longer is able to interpret the lens data to know what lens was used. As I understand it, Pentax's numbering system internal to the raw file that identifies the lens changed, and LR no longer interprets it.
I believe that this will probably be a temporary situation; eventually a newer version of LR will come out that supports lens metadata for Pentax K10D raw files.
My concern is this: when and if this problem is ever corrected, will I have to re-import my raw images so that their lens metadata will be acquired into the LR database?
A lot of "if's", I know. Hopefully my question actually makes sense! haha

Talk to Canon and Tokina - if that data is properly given to the camera and properly recorded in the EXIF data by the camera then iPhoto will display it - if it is not there then iPhoto can not do anything about it - only the manufactures can fix that
LN

Export Full EXIF (inluding lens data)

It would be nice if exporting would include all of the EXIF from the original image. In particular, I would like the lens data included. (Yes, I do not have "Minimize Embedded Metadata" checked.)
For example (among other things), the original image (taken with Nikon D200) includes (exported with exiftool):
]Focus Distance : 10.00 m
Focus Mode : AF-S
Focus Position : 0x05
Lens : 18-50mm f/2.8 G
Lens Data Version : 0201
Lens F Stops : 6.00
Lens ID : Unknown (7F 48 2D 50 24 24 1C 06)
Lens ID Number : 127
Lens Type : G
Max Aperture At Max Focal : 2.8
Max Aperture At Min Focal : 2.8
Max Focal Length : 50.4mm
Min Focal Length : 18.3mm
All of which I would love to see in the exported images. (I'm sure there are other ones too that I just didn't notice off-hand.)
jon

Yes, I found this morning that camera data is not exported. This is a major problem. I am entering contests which require the metadata to verify that the photo was taken within a certain period. I just realized that this data is lacking on every picture that I have exported from LR. Luckily I can process those photos in DxO to retain the data.

Iam not able to view preview data under preview tab in BI 7

Dear One's
Can any one kindly reason out the occurance of my problem ?
Iam not able to view preview data under preview tab in BI 7 even the file format is CSV and no. of rows to be ignored is 1 and data separator is "," & escape sign is ";"
The error was some thing like " infoobject MAT_IDMAT_NAME_MAT_TYPE is not corelated"
Though I was given seperated the columns like MAT_ID & MAT_NAME & MAT_TYPE
Thanks in advance,
Raj

Hi Raj,
If it is CSV, you can make corections data source itself.Once you check the fields entered in the data source with your csv file, because there may be some mismatching between the file you loaded and data source.Enter thre fields in data source as per your file.And check the line to be displayed option, when you clicking on preview.
If you still getting problem, let me know.

Rensa cachen, varför inte "Rensa ut känslig data" under verktygsmenyn efter att ha rensat cachen, så jag kan gå vidare enligt mozilla/instruktion??

Har försökt rensa cachen enligt Firefox/mozilla support, funkar innte enligt anvisning:
1. Klicka på verktyg-meny, OK
2. Väljer att enbart markera cache, trycker sedan på Ta bort-knappen. fönstret stängs, OK
3. Skall nu enligt instruktion klicka på Verktyg-meny och välja "Rensa ut känslig data" för att öppna fönstret "Rensa ut käslig data".
OBS! Jag har inte "Rensa ut känslig data" under min flik Verktyg-myny att välja på !!!
4. Vad göra??

Hello torstenmats, it is in '''History''' menu > Clear Recent History.... > select whatever you want.
see for more info : [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/remove-recent-browsing-search-and-download-history#w_how-do-i-clear-my-history How do I clear my history?]
thank you

Need to Create Customer Master Data under Multiple Sales Areas

Hi Gurus,
         My requirement is to create a customer under multiple sales areas by processing the Inbound Idoc function module "IDOC_INPUT_DEBITOR"( After generating Outbound Idoc and outbound is processed successfully).
         But, when I am trying to send the multiple sales areas information in segment "E1KNVVM". It is creating the customer under first sales area filled in first E1KNVVM segment and it is giving error that "Fill all required fields SAPMF02D 0111 ADDR1_DATA-NAME1" and it is not creating the customer under other sales areas.
        Following are the details of the Outbound Idoc which I have processed.
        Idoc Basic type : DEBMAS06
        Message          : DEBMAS
        I have filled required fields in E1KNA1M and E1KNVVM segments. But filled E1KNVVM segments twice with different sales area data.
      Please help in solving this problem?

is it really just one IDOC?
I have never seen that SAP just does a part of one IDOC.
the structure of DEBMAS ist like this:
E1KNA1M
--E1KNVVM
E1KNVPM
E1KNVDM
E1KNVIM
--E1KNB1M
which means for your example it should be like this
E1KNA1M
--E1KNVVM
E1KNVPM
E1KNVDM
E1KNVIM
--E1KNVVM
E1KNVPM
E1KNVDM
E1KNVIM
--E1KNB1M
and in this case I am very certain that it would never just process and create the part for one sales area.
Maybe your customer already exists from ealier tests with just one sales area.
Display your IDOC in WE02 or WE05 and make sure you have a value in name1 field

Delivery Creation Date under Shipping Tab in Purchase Order

Hi All,
When my client creates a Purchase Order with 5 line items, for 3 itmes he can create Delivery ( with delivery date of 25/03/2010) however for line itme 40 and 50 it gives error while creating delivery ( 0 units available of that material)
Stock exist in delivering plant as checked in MMBE.
On checking the PO, the difference i could find between line items 10.20.30 (which can be delivered) and line item 40, 50 (which cant be delivered) is that under Shipping tab for item 10,20 and 30 Delivery Creation Date is Blank. However for item 40 and 50 Delivery creation date is maintained same as delivery date i.e. 25/3/2010.
In VL10B we have already tried inputting Delivery creation date as 25/03/2010 and then executing after supplying the PO number but it still gave the same error messgae.
Kindly guide as it is stopping Business. A speedy reply will be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
BR,
Anshul

Re: Only 0 KG of material available
Kindly check above mentioned thread.

No lens data under dpp 3.13.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for