No Logical System Entry in Business System

When I will send an IDOC from XI to a target R/3 system, I am getting an error "Unable to convert the sender service to an ALE logical system "
I checked the threads and the problem seems to be, that there is no Logical System recognised by the Business System.
I'll checked the logical System in the Technical System in SLD, and it is there.
I checked SALE, and the entry is in the systems.
But when I go to the Integration Directory and check System-->Adapter Specific Informations, I see an empty entry for "Logical System". The field stays un-editable and when I hit the "Sync with SLD" button, nothing happens.
Any idea, how to either enter the logical system or make it recognise the SLD entry?
Thanks for any hints, points will surely be awarded

Hi,
Have you looked int XI FAQ by Michal?
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions
Have a look into the weblog
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/03/29/xi-error--unable-to-convert-the-sender-service-to-an-ale-logical-system
which addresses your problem.
Regards,
Jai Shankar

Similar Messages

SLD: Adjust / Add logical system name for Business System [XI 3.0]

Hi,
In the <b>System Landscape Directory</b>, is it possible to adjust the logical system name of an already created business system?
I found in the content maintenance in Subset="All Classes", Class=SAP_BCClient" --> <MY_BUSINESSSYSTEM_ENTRY> the only possibility to add information on the logical system name of a business system.
Unfortunately, the information provided in the BCClient Entry is not forwarded to the Business System Entry for my Business System in the Business Landscape View of the SLD...
Is there another possibility to add the logical system name to an exisiting business system?
Regards
Kristian

In a third party business system, it is not possible to add a logical system, but you can delete the business system and recreate it with the same name without problems.
After assigning a new logical system to a business system, you have to go to the integration directory and reload the logical system for the business system. Therefore open the Business System in change mode and maintain the Logical System with menu service -> Adapterspecific Identifiers.
Regards
Stefan

Logical System for RFC-Business system?

Hi,
I want use RFC adapter for my scenario like File to RFC.
The query is like, is there any importance to use Logical system for my Business System which is using for my RFC Adapter in my communication channel.
Regards
Gopi

logical system name is relevant only for Idocs, but it is always a good idea to maintain the technical and business systems with all the information you can provide.
you can check the logical system names of ABAP application servers at bd54 tx code.
Regards,
Henrique.

Same Logical System Name, different Business System

Hi all,
I have a problem regarding SLD and Integration Directory. The client is requiring me to use the same logical system name for two different business systems. It seems that this is not possible in XI. When I tried activating the business system in ID, I'm getting the error, 'Logical system XXX already exists in communication component YYY'. Please help. Thanks!
IX

Hi,
You cannot have same logical name for two business systems....
Why you need it?? How will the SAP system understand which which system the message was sent for?? Some workaround like
1. Create a business system with this logical system
2. Overwrite sender/receiver business system in the receiver agreement for messages sent to 2nd business system..
This may lead to discrepancies....
Regards
Suraj

3rd party tech systems for multiple business systems...

I think this might a very stupid question but still would like to post it..:).. In a 3parties involved scenario, can 1 technical system be assigned to multiple business systems , if all business systems refer to the same 3 party..or does each 3rp party business system needs its own technical system..
Also I need to move only 1 product and the SWCV assigned to the product to QA..I do not want to export entire SLD..By exporting this single product and importing into the SLD of QA, I hope it will not overwrite the SLD components of the QA box but add this new product as delta.
-Teresa

Hi Teresa,
>>>Also I need to move only 1 product and the SWCV assigned to the product to QA..I do not want to export entire SLD..By exporting this single product and importing into the SLD of QA, I hope it will not overwrite the SLD components of the QA box but add this new product as delta
I believe you can only do an incremental export/import
sld does not allow importing/exporting one product...
Remember to do a backup of your QA SLD
(from the SLD - administration)
then if you make a mistake nothing will happen
about the second question:
<i>"Business systems, which name the logical receiver independently of technical properties. For example, a business system might be a client of an SAP system.
Technical systems with which the hardware of the system is specified in more detail (server data, and so on)."</i>
this should be possible not only for SAP systems
Regards,
michal
Message was edited by: Michal Krawczyk

Logical system name in business system (SLD)

Hi,
While creating business system in SLD what should give for the logical system name?
Should the logical system name exists in ABAP stack or the new one?
Thanks.

Hi,
If you are creating the BS for SAP R/3 in SLD means we have to give the LS name which we had in SAP R/3( goto SALE and take the LS from there)
Goto Assign LS-----take the client which you are using for SAP R/3 and take the LS name assigned to that Client
Regards
Seshagiri

I need help in logical system name in business system

i created two business system with same logical system name and now am getting error in ID when i try to activate business system"" Logical system LSSUN already exists in service | BS_RCVESUN"" So,i again changed a logical system name in SLD and tried to activate it again but changes is not reflected back in ID.again it show logiacal system alredy exists.
pls giv me a steps to reflect changes back in ID.
thanks & Regards
Manikandan Shanmugam

open BS in edit mode,
choose from menu: Adepter Specific Identifiers
Here you push button: Compare SLD data
Save and activate

Logical Sys Name for Business system in SLD for Third Party

Hi !!
I have little doubt what will be the logical system name for creating Business systems in SLD for third party?
thanks
Gowri

Hi Gowri,
sorry, i dont agree with the other answers. The logical system name is required for ALE partner finding. If you dont want to communicate with IDocs you dont need it. If you want to send messages from third party system to R/3 via IDoc adapter, then you should (can) give a name. It can be configured in IB directory as well (adapter specific identifiers). Choose any name, this name will be used for the partner agreement in R/3.
Regards,
Udo

XI system as a business system in XI SLD?

Hello,
I recently saw an XI SLD where not just the R/3 business systems, but also the XI system itself was configured as a business system. Is there any need to have the XI system itself in its own SLD as a business system?
If yes: Do I also have to configure transport target for the XI business system (e.g. from XI dev to XI prod)?
Thanks,
Christoph

Hi,
yes the XI has to be configured as business system with role 'Integration Server'.
Regards
Patrick

Logical System Name Not appearing in the Business System

Hi,
Initially we had created a Technical system with Client 700 without a "Logical System Name" in SLD. hence the 'logical system name' in 'business system' was also Blank.
Now, since we are implementing the IDOC to file scenario; we need to maintain the "Logical System Name" in the client and which in turn should reflect in our Business System in SLD.
Though we maintained the Logical System Name in the Technical System --> Client --> Logical System Name; we are unable to see the same(Logical System Name) in Business System ('Integration' tab)
Please also note that Business System is of the ROLE: Integration server.
When we go to business system in SLD ---Integrtaion tab ---Logical System Name -- is still blank.
Can anyone please help us to update the 'Logical system name' in Business System in SLD?
Regards,
Rehan

Hi Sunil,
I followed your link till
Bussiness System -> select your bussiness System -> in Below pane u will find Details of your bussiness system ->amongs the various tabs available select Integration Tab->U will See option for technical system beside that u will see option for change ->click this ->u will be taken to Logical system ->there u define u r logical syatem name and then save the entries.
When I clicked the option chnage ---> "Change Associated Technical System" appeared, It didn't take me to Logical system.
But in turn I clicked hyperlink corresponding to Technical systems, it took me to technical system --> clients tab --I have entered the Logical system name.
When I go back to Business system again its not showing the Logical system name in Integration tab.
regards,
rehan

Logical system and business system

Hi experts, please help me with the below questions---
1) What is the diff between logical system and business system?
2)what is the difference between logical system(defined in R/3) and business system (defined in SLD) in idoc to file scenario.
3) Is it require to give the logical system name of the xi server(Which we define in idx1 port) to the 3rd party system(Application system at the FTP side) to carry out file to idoc scerario?

Hi,
Business System :
1. Business systems are logical systems, which function as senders or receivers within XI. Business systems can be SAP systems or third-party systems. Depending on the associated technical system.
2. Business Systems should be mandatory used when dealing with Idoc's and Proxies .
Business Service:
1. Business Service requires manual adding on Inbound and Outbound Interfaces, Business Systems do not.
2. Business Services are maintained across environments and so, their names cannot be changed. Business Systems names can be changed across environments by providing SLD level transport targets.
3.In the Business Services we cannot maintain the Group and Targets in SLD. For Ease in transporting your ID/Configuration objects Groups and Targets are used in SLD for Business Systems.
4.Business Service has no SLD Entries and No Assigned Products and SWCV's
Regards
Sangeetha

ATP Check Issue - No business system could be determined for logical system

Dear all
Got an issue while executing ATP check on a planned order in product view,
with a message: "No business system could be determined for logical system"
CIF setting wise:
regular business system group maintained and assigned in place,
master data wise:
business system group info fine in product master,
Is there anywhere suggested to check under ATP setting:
category, check mode, business event, check control/check instruction?
Your kindest enlighting is appreciated,
Thank you,
mandy

Dear Mandy,
usually this error is caused by a missing customizing entry:
spro:
Integration with SAP Components
   Integration via APO Core Interface (CIF)
     Basic Settings for Creating the System Landscape
       - Maintain Business System Group
       - Assign Logical System and Queue Type :
Please read the documentation for these two transactions and create the systems.
You need to specifiy there all systems that are in your BSG. The documentation for the customizing of 'name logical system' in APO says:
To enable the transfer of data between SAP R/3 and SAP APO, you need to name both the SAP APO system in which you are working and the SAP R/3 system to which you want to transfer data as logical systems.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Tibor

Business system and logical system names

hello experts,
Right now m creating scenarios of IDOCs, Files and RFCs. Just wanted to know that is it compulsory to give Business system name and Logical system names same?
Does it make difference if i will give both names different?
Regards,
H.S.

Hi,
I guess i have not explained you proprely.
Here logical system mean m asking abt the system name which we are using in RFC connections to make connection between two systems.
does Business system name and Logical system name should be same?
Actually right now we have done system copy of production system into our sandbox. So all the things are pointing to the production system.
I was just wondering, if i will just change ip/ hostname into the Technical system (ip of sandbox system) and keep business system name as it is( which is right now of production system)... then for me no need to create all ID Objects again. Its just an idea. So just wanted to check is it ok... bcz in ID i have more than 60 objects which i need to create again. and i have very less time
Or if anyone can tell me any good idea to do that.
Thankx in advance.
Regards,
H.S.

SLD Business System with or with out Logical System If so, which Log system

Hi
I'm in confuse with the Logical System when creating a Business System in SLD.
Our requirement is LEGACY -- PI/XI -- ECC.
When I create Business sytem in SLD, I need to give a Logical System. Which system (Is it xi/pi or ECC ) Logical System to be provided?
Thanks.

>
Pothana Yadav wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm in confuse with the Logical System when creating a Business System in SLD.
> Our requirement is LEGACY -- PI/XI -- ECC.
>
> When I create Business sytem in SLD, I need to give a Logical System. Which system (Is it xi/pi or ECC ) Logical System to be provided?
>
> Thanks.
if you are using File to IDoc scenario then need to define logical systems for both business systems you are going to create for
i.e they will be used as sender and receiver partners in case of logical systems
if need more details check the below blog
/people/rajeshkumar.pasupula/blog/2009/03/16/unable-to-convert-the-sender-service-to-an-ale-logical-system
check the same for how logical system are used in this case...
note above will be helpful in case of only idoc scenario..else no need of creating logical systems even though target sysstem is ECC
HTH
Rajesh

One Business System Per Client

Going in, I figured I could have multiple business systems tied to a single technical system. For example, if I have a techical system (SAP R/3) of RD0 110, and I want to have one business system for a vendor price check, another for sending ship notice idocs to a 3rd party server, etc.
When I go to add a second Business System to RD0 110 in SLD, I get an error that "The selected client already has a business system. Select a different client or system.".
Where am I going wrong?

Hi Keith,
the problem you are running in is that the SLD checks your business system entries against used client and logical system from tech.system. If one is already used in a link to a bus.system SLD does not allow to link the same tech. system to another bus.system.
But you don´t have unique namespaces for each scenario.
You will import the SWCV from SLD into Int.Rep..
Then you can define a range of namespaces in the SWCV object.
In each namespace you can implement a scenario.
The SWCV is connected to a bus. system, that s right.
But the scenario will not only work with one bus.system.
Usually you will use the SWCV to build up a scenario in Int.Rep. for the sender system providing the scenario with data.
The bus. systems defined in the SLD are more relevant in the Int.Directory, when implementing the comm.channels and building up the interface-/sender-/receiver-determinations per scenario.
If you could connect a tech. system to several business systems what could be the advantage? The tech.system is basis for connecting to SWCVs.
We had the same question here in the beginning of our project but our result was that the multi bus.system connect to a tech. system would only produce more need of organizing the structure in the SLD.
We put the focus on naming conventions in the namespaces to separate the different scenarios for the same bus.system as data provider (=sender).
If more than one system is sending the same date in a business scenario you need to establish that in having a well defined definition (agreements) in the Int. Repository!
Hope this can help!
Best regards
Dirk

No Logical System Entry in Business System

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for