No logical system exists

Hi
I am loading Bi stats cube. The DS 0TCT_DS02...i IP run gives error " No logical system exists for client 630" . Same is the error in rsa3 also.. the loading runs fine for other DS. What should i do??
Thanks
Prashant

Hi mahendra,
Source system is mentioned in tools-->source system assignment....the load is working fine with all other DS only the technical content DS is having this issue...is there any settings to b made for technical content in R/3 side also??
Thanks
Prashant

Similar Messages

RSTCO_ADMIN - "No logical system exists for client 100"

Hi all.
I am trying to run RSTCO_ADMIN in a BI 7.0 SP11 system. The activation stops / fails, and in the log I get a warning message saying:
"No logical system exists for client 100".
In SALE and SCC4 I have created a logical system TBQCLNT100 and assigned it to client 100. Client 100 was created with a client copy from client 000.
Does anyone know what I have to do to fix this?
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Thomas

Thomas
Check if you have configured the RSADMINA table, here you will see a "bw client" filed, put 100 as your bi client.
Regards

Logical system already exists in communication component | Sys_R

Hi
What should be done if there are 2 diff systems with the same logical system name. Since the technical systems are different, i am able to create different business systems for it. But it gives errors during ID configuration..
Regards
Monica

Hi
-->Whether the LOGICAL SYSTEMS are assigned to the Same client?It should be for different clients and one LS can assign to 1 existing client.
-->U are creating 2 different TS as WEB AS ABAP so in that you will maintain the details of 2 different systems.
-->finally creating the 2 different BS's in that maintain your LS and for each BS we need to assign the TS name and click finish.(NOTE:While assigning the TS to BS pls observe)
Thanks.

Product category does not exist in logical system

Hello Experts,
Need help in understanding product category change behaviour.
Shopping cart created and approved.
PO created and approved.
Now PO change version created by changing product category.
Please enlighten me whether this change is really allowed on business perspective and SAP perspective.
So far we been told that there is business case to justify this change.
If allowed by SAP, then how do we solve the problem of error occuring in workflow "product category does not exist in logical system XXXX".
Please advise.
Thanks,
Gaurav

Hi
I dont have a system right now to check
1.are you ordering the item from external catalog? ( any mapping between catalog product category to SAP product category )?
2. after approved PO created.
3. Now BUYER could change the product category again?
4. why the BUYER takes push ups for REQUESTER . Let Buyer cancel the PO and ask requester to create a PO.
What is the business process existing in your business ?
Since product category determines purchase group and every thing like gl account etc..
Can you recreate the same issue in development box?
Note 1466155 - GL account not re-determined on change of product categorySymptom
You have an SRM PO with items having multiple account assignment. Go to the PO item overview OR to the item basic data tab and change the product category. However, this does not trigger a new GL account determination for the accounting lines.
Note 1407962 - Category is editable when contract is assigned in PO item
Symptom
When ever a Contract item (Free text or Product Category) is assigned to a Purchase order free text line item, The category modification is not allowed. This is because the product category is always copied from the contract item and overrides the Category for Purchase Order Item. It is confusing for the user as the category is editable and can't be modified.
SAP has different different behaviors . Kindly tell us what type you belongs too...

An RFC destination could not be specified for the logical system

Hello Experts,
I am trying post goods receipt in EWM system in a simple inbound delivery process. It is not getting posted back in ECC. I have my RFC connection setup properly(I assume since I was able to transfer inbound delivery to EWM in first place).It seems some setting related to Outbound queue in EWM is missing.Can anyone tell me in detail what settings are required?Is it something to do with WE20 transaction?I am not sure what settings should be done there.The error log is as below-
An RFC destination could not be specified for the logical system
SB3CLNT011
Message No. B1550
Diagnosis
An RFC destination should be specified for the logical system SB3CLNT011.
This could not be done in this case. SB3CLNT011 is not your local logical system
and this system is not included in the relevant Customizing tables.
Procedure
Check:
RFC
destination
Port
definitions
oubound partner profile of
message type SYNCH for this logical system
Regards,
Khushboo

Hi Oritra and Suraj,
I have checked remote connection in SM59 for both the logical system.It works fine.I understand this is more of a technical issue,but I don't have A local basis team to help me so reaching out to experts here.Can you guide me what technical settings could be checked for EWM-->ECC connection?When I execute BD82 for SB3CLNT011 it shows me green status with message "No messages have been defined for the selection conditions in the model".
Although when I do this for EWM logical system SB3CLNT012 it shows me this with all green status-
System SB3CLNT011 as a partner type already exists
System SB3CLNT012 as a partner type already exists
Port A000000018 with RFC destination SB3CLNT011 already exists
Outbound parameters for message type SHP_IBDLV_CHANGE SHP_IBDLV_CHANGE01 already
Outbound parameters for message type SHP_IBDLV_SAVE_REPLICA SHP_IBDLV_SAVE_REPLI
Outbound parameters for message type SYNCH SYNCHRON already exist
Am I missing something in WE20?
Regards,
Khushboo

Logical System(ORGLOGSY) populating from which table in R/3 system

Hi Friends,
I would like to understand about the Logical System(ORGLOGSY) from which table or from where this logical system being populating.
Because we could see this fields Logical System(ORGLOGSY) exist in PO item, HDR, SGR data sources.
Can anybody give some idea, how we'll get this source system logical system name into BW system.
SIRI

Hi Siri,
Check here
V_TBDLS
TX: RSA13----->Tools -
>assigment of source system to source system id
hope this will help you.
Thanks,
Vijay.

Logical system name for acknowledgement in BPM

Hi,
I have a szenario:
IDOC --> BPM --> MAIL
Inside BPM I check the message and depending on an xml-element I stop the process or I send the message by mail.
When I stop the process the BPM sends back an acknowledgement and in SXMB_MONI I can see an error of the acknowledgement:
"Sender Test_BPM_IDOC_TO_MAIL kann nicht in ein ALE Logisches System umgeschlüsselt werden" (Sender can not convert in a ALE logical system)
What can I do?
Possible Solution 1:
I can define my BPM "Test_BPM_IDOC_TO_MAIL" as a logical system (including WE20 for ALEAUD).
Possible Solution 2:
I can enter an existing logical system name in the "adapter specific attributes".
BUT it is not use the same logical system name twice (BAD ... or is there a workaround?
Is Solution 1) a common way?
Thanx
Regards
Wolfgang Hummel

Hi,
there are many ways:
some for aleaud are described in my book:
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2006/10/11/xi-new-book-mastering-idoc-business-scenarios-with-sap-xi"><b>Mastering IDoc Business Scenarios with SAP XI</b></a>
>>>>Is Solution 1) a common way?
no this is not good a good idea
BTW
you can also supress aleaud raport IDX_NOALE
Regards,
michal
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions"><b>XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</b></a>

New outputs generated when changing logical system in output master record

Hi!
We are sending documents from ECC 5 to a legacy system via XI/PI. We are about to move from an old XI installation to a new PI installation. The output record used (for example in a billing document) is set up based on logical system. When moving from the old to the new platform, we need to change the output records from the old logical syste to the new logical system. However this leads to generation of new outputs in all billing docs when opened in change mode. This goes also for billing docs where we already generated outputs via lthe old logical system in the past. Is there any solution to prevent the automatic generation of outputs for documents where the condition type already was successfully processed (as it works when the logical system is not changed)?
Best regards
/Björn

Normally the same output is not supposed to be generated, unless 'Multiple issuing' checkbox is checked in the output type configuration.
Also you can probably add a requirement in the output determination procedure and check if output record already exists. Take a look at the standard 'Reprint' routine, kind of the opposite is needed in this case.

Logical system name in business system (SLD)

Hi,
While creating business system in SLD what should give for the logical system name?
Should the logical system name exists in ABAP stack or the new one?
Thanks.

Hi,
If you are creating the BS for SAP R/3 in SLD means we have to give the LS name which we had in SAP R/3( goto SALE and take the LS from there)
Goto Assign LS-----take the client which you are using for SAP R/3 and take the LS name assigned to that Client
Regards
Seshagiri

Multiple Logical Systems in Partner Profile for one instance

Can we create multiple Logical Systems in Partner Profile (WE20) for one instance or one System? If it is possible, can we create Logical System with respect to Plant/Country?

I am not quite sure if I understood your problem completley. But let's see...
Usually you use on on MSCS Cluster Group per SAP instance. So you have your already existing NW 7.0 ABAP stack in a separated Cluster Group, and you create a new Cluster Group for your new Java system.
You can find more information about it in this guide here on SDN:
Link: [High Availability;
More information about High Availability Setups for SAP System can be found here on SDN:
Link: [High Availability]
If you want to use the same database for your clustered ABAP stack and your new Java stack you can do a MCOD installation.
Please see Link: [SAP Note 388866 - Multiple Components on One Database - Installation|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/388866]
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Mathias

XI testing for two SAP R/3 systems with same system id/logical system

Hi
We are currently in the process of upgrading our R/3 4.7 to ECC 6.0 and plan to maintain dual landscape for DEV & QA (4.7 & ECC 6.0) for a period for testing and maintaining existing applications for fixes etc. The second DEV & QA (upgraded to ECC 6.0) are copy of respective systems and these systems are created automatically under technical systems in SLD by auto update (RZ70).
The question is, can we use the same XI system for testing inbound/outbound interfaces for both the systems i.e 4.7 & ECC 6.0 at the same time. I am aware of the fact that XI Technical/Business sytems dependent on unique logical systems, so we cannot create new business system for the upgraded DEV-II ECC 6.0 system.
For your information, we have two slds (one for XID/XIQ and second one for XIP).
What are the options without disturbing & maintaining the current XI system set up?
1) Can we change current Business systems e.g DEV010 to use new technical system i.e DEV-II ECC 6.0 for testing for a period and switch it back to DEV-I 4.7 technical system?
2) or change logitical system name of DEV-II ECC 6.0 and create new business sytem in SLD without interfering the existing setup and modify/create interfaces to use this new business system?
3) Do we need to refresh cache from time to time in XI ?
4) Any other implications
We will be upgrading XI to PI 7.1 after ECC 6. 0 Upgrade.
Any views on this would be highly appreciated.
Regards
Chandu

Hi
Technical System was created in the SLD automatically after RZ70 configuration in the new DEV-II system. We then modified Business System to use the new Technical system and carried out following steps:
1)     Original Idoc metadata was deleted from XID
2)     The port definition was deleted
3)     A new port definition was created for new system
4)     The metadata for each idoc type used was re-created in IDX2 , using METADATA -> CREATE
5)     This brought in all known versions of the idoc segments, including the 7.1 version.
I have already checked the guides suggested for our upgrade and we are thinking of going ahead with fresh installation and migrating the interfaces.
Regards
Chandu

An SLD system has not been assigned to logical system TEC101

Hello all
We are trying to send an message RFC or IDOC from our SRM (5.0) system to the XI (7.0). But we allways get the error
"An SLD system has not been assigned to logical system TEC101". In the SLD the system is visible, sldcheck works.
Does anyone know this problem and can give me a hint how to fix this problem?
Thanks a lot
Stefan

Hi Stefan,
Is there a technical & Business System for SRM5.0 in SLD? If entry exists then confirm if the logical system name mentioned in Business System is TEC101.
If entry does not exist in SLD for SRM, then in SRM run t-code
1) SLDAPICUST .. Enter relevant details
2) RZ70 : Give XI Server details , activate and then Execute.
Once you do that you can see entry for SRM in SLD.
After that try running the schenario again.
Regards,
Sumit

Logical System Conversion after system refresh failed

Hello,
Logical System Conversion after system refresh couldn't complete as the printer was locked. This job was run in the background. In SM37, the job log of RBDLSMAP shows as job finished, but it took only 40 seconds. Now I see that the logical system got changed(Converted) in the client settings scc4 but I know that this client being a production client and would run for couple of hours. Here is the job log information.
02/18/2009 16:09:33 Job started                                                                     00           516          S
02/18/2009 16:09:33 Step 001 started (program RBDLSMAP, variant &0000000000000, user ID ABCD)      00           550          S
02/18/2009 16:09:33 Output device PRN1 is locked in the SAP system                                  PO           349          I
02/18/2009 16:10:19 Job finished                                                                    00           517          S
When try to rerun bdls again, it shows that it is already available and it says "The new logical system name is already assigned to the current client".
Any suggestions on this?
Thanks,
Mahesh

Hi ,
Rerun the BDLS again as this took very little time.
When you try to run again it popsup message saying it already exists just delete that and again put the Logical system name and run it will run that time.
May be while scheduling the job you gave for spool I am not sure why is it looking for Printer which is locked.
Thanks.

PLEASE HELP ME TO FIND THE SOLUTION REGARDING "LOGICAL SYSTEM CHANGED"

HAI EVERYBODY,
PLEASE HELP ME TO FIND THE SOLUTION REGARDING "LOGICAL SYSTEM CHANGED" during the material master replication by using middleware parameters.
step1 : i have taken SRM client 810 and named it as CHINNISRM
step2 : i have taken r3 client 810 and named it as CHINNIR3
step3: During material master replication i maintained tables like crmconsum,crmrfcpar,crmparoltp in r3 and smofparsfa in srm client and filtered the objects and loaded the objects through r3ac3,r3ac1,r3as.
step4 : And later i have checked in r3 queues to activate the objects,but i have seen a message like "LOGICAL SYSTEM CHANGED:SEE 588701".according to the oss instructions i have checked in CRMPRLS table in se16 in R3 .there i found out there is one logical client named with T90CLNT810.
oss :588701
Solution
There are different cases in which different forms of processing are
required or where several options exist:
- The logical system name of an R/3 Backend client was changed in
current operation. In this case, the data hangs in the outbound
queues of the R/3 Backend system as specified under point 1 of
the symptom. In this case, the logical system name must be
changed back to the original value. Then the outbound queues
can be reactivated. If no data was transferred to the EBP/CRM
server before the change, also a correctioin of the check table
is possible.
- The same logical system name was used again in a new client of
an R/3 Backend system that was linked to the EBP/CRM server. In
this case, the data is in the inbound queue of the EBP/CRM
server with the exception GUID_FOR_LOGSYS_CHANGED. In this
case, the queue entries which have status SYSFAIL must be rejected, however, not the entire queues. If the new client of the R/3 Backend system you have linked has exactly the same
data as the old client and if it is meant to replace the old
client (that is, this was deactivated), also a correction of
the check tables is possible. In this case, the inbound queues
can be reactivated after the correction.
oss:765018
1. If the situation in your system corresponds to the situation described
under "Reason and Prerequisites" and if symptom 1 occurs, you can
delete the table entry from table CRMPRLS table (there is just one
entry). Since there is no maintenance dialog for this table and you
cannot maintain it using transaction SE16, you must use a report to
delete it. This report is attached to this note as correction
instructions.
Create the report ZZ_DELETE_CRMPRLS in your system and copy the source
code from the correction instructions. You cannot implement this
source code using transaction SNOTE.
You can use the report in every plug-in or plug-in basis system, even
if it is not specified in the validity section.
After you have run the report, you can trigger existing queues again
in transaction SMQ1.
2. If the situation in your system corresponds to the situation described
under "Reason and prerequisite" and if symptom 2 occurs, you can
delete the entry from table CRMMLSGUID (there is just one entry).
Since there is no maintenance entry for this table and you cannot
maintain it using transaction SE16, you must use a report to delete
it. This report is attached to this note as correction instructions.
If they do not yet exist, add the following messages to message class SMOF in your logon language:
Message Message short text
303 User &1 is not allowed to change table &2.
304 User &1 IS not allowed to display table &2.
305 Logical system &1 was not found in table &2.
306 System error! The current client was not
found in table T000.
Create the report ZZ_DELETE_CRMMLSGUID in your system and copy the
source code from the correction instructions. You cannot implement
this source code using transaction SNOTE.
You can use the report for every release of the CRM system, even if it
is not specified in the validity section. The only exceptions are CRM
releases with Support Package versions that are too low such as CRM
Release 3.0 with Support Package 12.
After you have run the report, you can trigger existing queues again
in transaction SMQ1 of the R/3 back-end system or transaction SMQ2 of
the CRM system.
so what should i do to do the replication.please suggest me .untill and unless i solve my problem i cant move to the further activity.i hope you people can solve my problem.thanks in advance.
thanks and best regards,
n.chakradhar

Hi chakradhar,
Did you find a solution to your issue? We are facing a similar issue and looking to figure out how this can be resolved.
BR// 420

Error while assigning Logical System to Client

Hi,
I am trying to perfomr data transfer suing Idoc from SAP R/3 to PI.
For this, I have created a logical system PD1CLNT100.
But when I try to assign the client 100 to this Logical system through SALE, I ge the following error
"An entry already exists with the same key SALE"
but I am unable to see this entry in the client list in SALE.
Please tell me where is it picking the entry from?
regards,
Piyush

Hi Piyush Mathur SAP
Check once again for Client 100 ... there willl be entry (Assign the Logical System to Client)
Check in table V_TBDLS for Logical Systems..
T000 for Clients
Log out from the system and log in once again and check it....
i hope Above info helps you
Thanks
Ramesh

No logical system exists

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for