No performance metrics for group with 2 OC4Js

I created a new group with 2 OC4J instances through the console. Then I created an additional web site (AJP protocol) for these 2 OC4Js to provide access from a HTTP server. Everything is working as expected.
But in the console, I do not get any performance metrics for these OC4Js. Everything is appearing as Unavailable. I do see performance metrics for my home OC4J instance where the console is running from.
Any ideas would be appreciated.

Interesting would also be how many changes are made to fields of roles before they become a * value in the end anyway...
I place my bets on S_PROGRAM and a close second being S_TABU_DIS on that score card.
Cheers,
Julius

Similar Messages

Cannot perform rounding for invoices with a currency other than the documen

Hi all,
I need some one to help me
I want to process the incoming payment.
The AR Invoice is using USD
In Incoming Payment i want to pay using SGD,
I already set the BP in all currency
I also set the Bank account in Bank transfer payment mean in all currency.
But when i add the document i saw the message like this
"Cannot perform rounding for invoices with a currency other than the document currency. [Message 3524-31]"
What should i do ?
Thanks in advance
Regards
KK

Hi gordon,
Thanks for your respon.
I still do not understand, what you mean.
I test it in SBO DEMO Au which is the local currency is AUD and the system currency is also AUD.
Is the any special setting for this issue?
Or Do i miss the settings in SBO
My version is 8.81 pl 9
Thanks in advance

[Forum FAQ] The Value drop down list is grayed out when you perform search for Group Policy Objects in GPMC

Symptom
On Windows Server 2012 or Windows Server 2012 R2, when you use the Search for Group Policy Objects feature in GPMC, the “Value” field is not populated when you choose “User Configuration” as the Search Item. (See Figure 1.)
<Figure 1>
Cause
The happens because the Data of the (Default) value of the following Registry Key is not correct.
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\GPExtensions\{4D2F9B6F-1E52-4711-A382-6A8B1A003DE6}]
By default the Data is (value not set). (see Figure 2)
<Figure 2>
Resolution
The registry keys under [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\GPExtensions] are the Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions. The CSE name of the GUID {4D2F9B6F-1E52-4711-A382-6A8B1A003DE6} is
RemoteApp and Desktop Connections. Please follow the steps below to resolve the issue.
1. Locate the registry key: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\GPExtensions\{4D2F9B6F-1E52-4711-A382-6A8B1A003DE6}]
2. Take the ownership of this key: Right click on the registry key and choose Permissions option and click the Advanced button on the dialogue window. Then on the Advanced Security Settings dialogue window, click Change button to take the ownership
of the key for the current logon account and make the current logon account Full Control permission with the registry key. (See Figure 3.)
<Figure 3>
3. Change the data of (Default) value from "(value not set)" to
"RemoteApp and Desktop Connection Component". (See Figure 4)
<Figure 4>
4. Once the steps above are completed, the Value drop down list will be populated again when you perform Search in GPMC. (See Figure 5)
<figure 5>
This article has been created as a TechNet Wiki
here.
Please click to vote if the post helps you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

thanks for the tip - but you should create this as a wiki article as it will be easier to reference in the future
Regards,
Denis Cooper
MCITP EA - MCT
Help keep the forums tidy, if this has helped please mark it as an answer
My Blog
LinkedIn:

Performance metrics for 8i standard vs. enterprise

I'm looking for performance metrics comparicing Oracle 8i Standard Edition to the Enterprise Edition.
Basically, I'm tyring to determine what level of web-site traffic will necessitate use of Enterprise instead of Standard.
Any ideas out there?
Thank you,
Mike

Hi,
there should be no difference in performance because both products share the very same kernel.
Of course, EE has features like partitioning which make a huge difference when they are used.
So the answer clearly depends...

Performance issues for iOS with high resolution.

I made an app with a resolution of 480x320 for iOS. It works quite well.
I then remade it with a resolution of 960x640. In AIR for iOS settings I set Resolution to "High".
The app looked great, however there was a noticeable drop in performance.
The app functioned the same way as the original lower resolution app. but it was lagging.
Has anyone else had this problem?
Am I doing something wrong?

With my game, I had around 60fps on the 3GS, and around 50 on the iPhone 4, with the high settings. I got around 10 fps extra by using: stage.quality = StageQuality.LOW;
Air 2.6. I tried with Air 2.7, but it seems like that command can't be used there (?)

Performance Metrics for PI

We are running PI 7.0 on SP10 and we are having a few problems in XI. This was quite a straight forward scenario IDOC to XI to File. We have a 10 min collection BPM in between and all messages within that 10 min interval write into one file as a single message. When 1200 IDOCS were pumped in through the system, PI came to its knees. It could only process these in 2 (two) hours. In spite of the fact that we have 16 GB of memory, for some reason BASIS has configured only one JVM node. We changed the entire processing by writing into an output file in an append mode for 10 mins each and there was no perceptible difference in performance at all. We tried converting the IDOCs to xml files so that it became a file to file scenario to get some performance stats. Not much difference. Does anybody in the community have any benchmark metrics figures for different kind of systems and scenarios? These are all in SUN Solaris systems.
We have another interface coming up where we have to handle 10 million DB records from a source file, process them and load them to MDM database. Anybody has any figures on MDM and PI? Would greatly appreciate any help.

Hi,
there should be no difference in performance because both products share the very same kernel.
Of course, EE has features like partitioning which make a huge difference when they are used.
So the answer clearly depends...

What will be the Upper Limits for Performance Metrics for Alerting

Hi,
We are planning to monitor the Performance of Cloud Services hosted onto Azure through VisualStudioOnline [TFS].
What will be the Upper limits for below metrics per cloud service hosted on Azure:-
CPU Percentage
Disk Read Bytes/Sec
Disk Write Bytes/Sec
Network In [Bytes/Sec]
Network Out [Bytes/Sec]
Thanks for the help.
Regards, Subhash Konduru

Hi,
An alert rule enables you to monitor a Azure service based on a metric value. When the value of a specified metric violates the threshold assigned for a rule, the alert rule becomes active and registers an alert.
To create an Alert Rule, you might want to check the below article
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/dn306638.aspx
To know more on the limits please follow the link
http://azure.microsoft.com/en-in/documentation/articles/azure-subscription-service-limits/
Hope this helps !
Regards,
Sowmya

Performance Metrics for PB and L7Pro

Can anyone tell me what the performance difference would be in upgrading a 17" PB (1.67GHz) from 1GB Ram to 2GB? Is it worth the money? This laptop and upgrade is SOLELY for Logic support and music, so no other concerns are relevant.
Thanks,
JG

More CPU performance and sampler instruments, more tracks, faster handling. If you're hitting the ceiling often (which is easy on a 'book) it is worth the money, shouldn't be terribly expensive-but it depends on your vendor an what your current configuration is. If it works well for you now it may not be worth it.

New OC4J group - no performance metrics

I set up a new OC4J group in my app server (ver 10.1.3.1) with 2 OC4J instances. I am not getting any performance metrics for either OC4J instance. On the Performance page, it shows "Unavailable" for everything.
I am getting performance metrics for my default_group with the home OC4J instance.
Any ideas about what I need to configure to start collecting performance metrics for my new group OC4J instances?

Michael,
Is there a specific person we could request this paper from and is it available yet? I consult for a large company so its kind of hard to get to the sales person from bea that is handling
our contract.
Thanks,
Odysseas
"Michael Girdley" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
Please contact your sales representative, we will have a performance White
paper available shortly.
Thanks,
Michael
Michael Girdley
BEA Systems Inc
"Soumitra Sengupta" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
Hello:
I am new to this group. I am looking for some performance metrics for
Weblogic 5.1 Server running on Solaris 7 and Oracle 8. Any help will be
appreciated.
Soumitra

Freelancew work for performance metrics

http://www.rentacoder.com/RentACoder/misc/BidRequests/ShowBidRequest.asp?lngBidRequestId=899712

Hi
Yes , I have 3 years ago of experience in build performance metrics for monitoring oracle databases

64-bit vs. 32-bit performance on SPARC hardware with the 1.6 JVM

I'm doing performance tuning for our Tomcat ckuster running on SPARC hardware. The 32-bit JVM gives us sufficient memory for now, but we are going to start using Terracotta for server striping so the extra memory the 64-bit JVM offers could be needed soon.
In addition to a bigger memory footprint, moving to the 64-bit JVM on SPARC has had a performance penalty. This FAQ shows a 10% - 20% performance hit when moving to the 64-bit JVM on SPARC on the 1.4 JVM:
http://java.sun.com/docs/hotspot/HotSpotFAQ.html#64bit_performance
I'm not interested in taking a 10% - 20% performance hit if I can avoid it. There's been discussion of using a 32-bit / 64-bit hybrid approach to avoid this problem so maybe the 1.6 JVM doesn't have the performance hit that the 1.4 JVM had:
http://blog.juma.me.uk/2008/10/14/32-bit-or-64-bit-jvm-how-about-a-hybrid/
Does anyone have current performance metrics for moving from the 32-bit JVM to the 64-bit JVM using the 1.6 JVM on SPARC?
Thanks.
Dean

Yes the 6380 FPU is shared between two cores. I just ran a diagnostic I made up that generates an array of 1 million random numbers, takes the average of those, and then excutes that repeatedly in a parallel loop. The 6380 showed a 20% to 30% improvement in speed between LV64 & LV32 bit depending on how many cores I told it to use. So that seems to make more sense. The other code that I was running that ran 4 times slower has a complicated clusters within a cluster structure including a large look up table array that is being passed around amoung several vi's. If it is moving that large amount of data around in memory, instead of just the pointer, that might explain it. But why then would the AMD run slower with 64 bit (by a factor of 4) when compared with the Core i7 which ran twice as fast, which kind of makes sense to me if it is moving that data around with twice the bandwidth?

Oracle E-Business Suite Performance Metrics?

Hi,
Can anyone please comment on the subject. What are the performance metrics? In general offcourse.
Sharjeel.

Performance metrics for Oracle E-Business Suite is used to gather information about application/database for the purpose of monitoring the performance (application server, forms sessions, database, CMs .. etc). Its one of the components of Oracle Applications Manager (OAM), OAM as well as Oracle Grid Control provide a complete and integrated solution for Oracle E-Business Suite system management.
To get more information and technical papers about this tool, please refer to "Administration and Management (OAM & OEM)" page at (http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/applications/admin/index.html)

1)    Is there North Bound Interface / API from SAP Solution Manager available for 3rd party integration?       i. The list of the modules that are being managed by SAP Solution Manager(s)      ii. The performance metrics of those modules/components at th

1)
Is there North Bound Interface / API from SAP Solution Manager available for 3rd party integration?
i. The list of the modules that are being managed by SAP Solution Manager(s)
ii. The performance metrics of those modules/components at the high level
iii. The information about Early Watch Alerts (or situations to watch for)
2)
Is there a full SNMP interface for getting the above information from SAP Solution Manager?
3)
Is that understanding that SAP has SNMP support for forwarding alerts to a 3rd party system, correct?
4)
Does SAP has both free and licensed? If yes then what are the advantages of licensed over the open/free version?

Mugunthan
Yes we have applied 11i.AZ.H.2. I am getting several errors still that we trying to resolve
One of them is
===========>>>
Uploading snapshot to central instance failed, with 3 different messages
Error: An invalid status '-1' was passed to fnd_concurrent.set_completion_status. The valid statuses are: 'NORMAL', 'WARNING', 'ERROR'FND     at oracle.apps.az.r12.util.XmlTransmorpher.<init>(XmlTransmorpher.java:301)
     at oracle.apps.az.r12.extractor.cpserver.APIExtractor.insertGenericSelectionSet(APIExtractor.java:231)
please assist.
regards
girish

Application Server (Pertinent Report values for performance metrics)

Hi
With dmstool what are the most relevant values to collect. My objectives are to compare performance metrics on two environments. First one is on 9iAS (or 10 g AS), the second is a weblogic environment.
Regards
Den

when running the dmstool -dump i noticed that some requests where throwing errors "connection refused".
I verified the server properties focusing on the dms port 7200;
I noticed that the listening adress and port was missing cfr httpd.conf
After adding this info metrics are displayed
thanks for the clue;
chris

Performance factors for criteria based groups

I am trying to understand what factors impact the performance of a criteria based group. I have read that member size has direct impact, but it does not make much sense, When a resource is updated, FIM looks for all criteria based groups that have criteria
containing the attributes updated in the resource and recalculates the membership of those groups. So my understanding is that the performance of criteria based group is dependent on the criteria, not on the member size of the group. If you have a lot
of criteria, then FIM will spend more time on evaluating the criteria and the chance of matching the attribute with the attributes updated in a resource will increase. The member size should not have much impact here.
Yes, member size can be an issue, but that will not be limited to a criteria based group - that should apply to any groups with large number of members. Because that impacts the memory footprints and complexity of membership calculation both in Sync
and in AD.
Is my understanding correct, or I am missing something?

If you have a lot of criteria, then FIM will spend more time on evaluating the criteria and the chance of matching the attribute with the attributes updated in a resource will increase.
For this, I know that in FIM 2010 R2 a new optimization feature came which fetches the information of "Common Criteria" from maximum number of groups and sets and uses this feature for calculating the group membership in a much faster
way which enhances the performance.
You can also, use the Deferred option in groups for calculating group membership. It is also a feature of FIM 2010 R2 for better performance.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj863243(v=ws.10).aspx
Regards,
Manuj Khurana

No performance metrics for group with 2 OC4Js

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for