No Revaluation Amount being posted in CKMLCP

Hello,
Please find the issue in more details.
We are performing CKMLCP for marking prices.
After this process we are releaseing the price for next period through CKME.
The revaluation amount is showing zero values despite of having some movement in some materials.
Though the revaluation amount is zero, the price has still be marked & released.
We tried to close the period for 3 and we still got the revaluation amount field zero after running CKME?
After analysing with the user, it is understood that users did CKMLCP Mark Material Price for Feb 2011 on Feb 26, 2011. They had input the manual date on 27.02.2011. It should be 01.03.2011.
Is it because the user has used wrong date for the closure of period 2 instead of using the first day of the next period (they used 27.02.2011), there is no revaluation values posted or shown up in the summary?
How can we rectify this? Is there a T code that can UNMARKED the material price & let us re-do the marking and CKME again?
Or the only way is to delete the costing run by using CKMLRUNDEL and re-run the whole process once again?
Could you please help us in understanding this?
Thanks and Regards
Sandeep

Hi ,
? Is there a T code that can UNMARKED the material price & let us re-do the marking and CKME again? = No , nothing is there ..
the only way is to delete the costing run by using CKMLRUNDEL and re-run the whole process once again? = Yes , its advisable to run CKMLRUNDEL and re-run the whole process again with correct dates ..
Becuse of incorrect dates.. there may be possibility that actual prices are now incorrect .. hence always advisable to delete ML run and redo it..
Regards
Sarada

Similar Messages

No Revaluation Amount is posted in CKMLCP

Hello,
I have a issue with the CKMLCP for the costing run.
1.I Marked Material Price for Feb 2011 on Feb 26, 2011. We had input the manual date as 27.02.2011 instead of 01.03.2011.
2.After this I did the CKME and no revaluation amount was reported. It seems that the revaluation amount is not posted.
I think step 1 had caused the CKME not working correctly after that. The amount for revaluation always is zero even if we put the date as 01.03.2011 or we do closing for March or Aprilu2026etc.
System just stop doing the revaluation and posting.
Can you help to confirm if that is how the system react if we input the date wrongly ?
How can we rectify this ?
Is there a T code that can UNMARK the material price & let us re-do the marking and CKME again?
Thanks
Sandeep

Hello,
Please find the issue in more details.
We are performing CKMLCP for marking prices.
After this process we are releaseing the price for next period through CKME.
The revaluation amount is showing zero values despite of having some movement in some materials.
Though the revaluation amount is zero, the price has still be marked & released.
We tried to close the period for 3 and we still got the revaluation amount field zero after running CKME?
After analysing with the user, it is understood that users did CKMLCP u2013 Mark Material Price for Feb 2011 on Feb 26, 2011. They had input the manual date on 27.02.2011. It should be 01.03.2011.
Isu2019t because the user has used wrong date for the closure of period 2 instead of using the first day of the next period (they used 27.02.2011), there is no revaluation values posted or shown up in the summary?
How can we rectify this? Is there a T code that can UNMARKED the material price & let us re-do the marking and CKME again?
Or the only way is to delete the costing run by using CKMLRUNDEL and re-run the whole process once again?
Could you please help us in understanding this?
Thanks and Regards
Sandeep

Reversal of Revaluation Amount in Assets at the time of retirement

Hi
I have posted revaluation through ABAWN. I have run depreciation and all entries are posted properly. Now i am retiring the asset through F-92.
After running F-92, entry was posted. I went through the entry and i found that the entry related to Original Cost (ie profit / reversal of accumlated depreciation, etc) was perfect. However reversal of revaluation entry was not passed in GL. I ran depreciation run for that month. Inspite of depreciation run, the revaluation was not reversed.
However in AW01N, the value is zero. Revaluation amount is value adjustment field (under comparison) & closing value is shown as zero.
Let me know when reversal of revaluation entry is passed.
Edited by: Deepak Agrawal on Oct 8, 2009 6:00 PM

Hi
I tried ASKB. But it gives error: Account 'Capital. difference/Non-operatng expense' could not be found for area 90
Area 90 is depreciation area for revaluation. I have to specify GL account in AO90. But i want to know the use of that field. What is the purpose of that field. Let me know how to go ahead.
Edited by: Deepak Agrawal on Oct 9, 2009 2:18 PM
Edited by: Deepak Agrawal on Oct 18, 2009 10:33 AM

Depreciation on Revaluated Amount

Dear Friends,
Our client wants to go for Revaluation and we did the following set up:
We have created two depr. areas 01 Book Dep and 15 Tax depreciation
In dep area 01 we have allowed revaluation as well as Revaluation Depreciation.
T-Code: OABW 01 depreciation area to manage Revaluation
OAYR For posting the revaluation amount in area 01
AO90 For defining the revaluation accounts
I have run transaction code ABAW to post revaluation.
I have put only revalued amount as 100 for testing in the existing asset.
Then after when i run repeat run for the previous month depreciation it is poting Revaluation amount in the GL i have given in AO90
But it is not posting anything in the Depreciation.
I have also tried to do fresh run for the next period it is not posting in the Depreciation for revaluation.
Then i tried to post the amount in ABAW with
"Proportional revaluation of annual ordinary dep." column. When i post it with repeat run, it has posted amount correctly.
This value of "Proportional revaluation of annual ordinary dep." is getting posted to the respective Depreciation and Contra Account.
Q: But when we run the depreciation for the next period, depreciation is calculated only on the Old Value but not taken into account the Revaluated amount.
Ex: NBV before Revaluation    : 1000 (depreciation per month : 100)
Revaluated amount                      100
NBV after Revaluation            : 1100
According to our requiremnt the depreciation to be posted in the new period should be equal to 110. But the system is posting only 100.
How to post 110 depreciation.
Thanks in Advance
Rayala

You can set up a virtual Area which is a Calculation of the two area you have then this can post the Difference for Depreciation only.
I have done an excercise similar to this so if you need further informaton let me know.

Manual bank statement status "being posted"

Hi guys,
We are using manual bank statement. We have created one statement, posted it, but the status in ff67 is still "being posted".
The accounting document has been created correctly; we have checked the corresponding bank account with FS10N and the amounts were posted.
In FEBAN the system displays a yellow triangle next to this statement.
Is there something we can do to corrcet the status?
Thanks
Ionut

Hi Ionut,
Please, use the program RFEBKA90 to set correct status of this
bank statement:
tr. SE38 -> Program: RFEBKA90
Enter parameters:
ID:
Change Status: 8
(SAP note 15759).
Then FEBKO-ASTAT will be 8 'Posting complete'.
Incorrect bank statement status could be caused by system terminations etc.
Also, you can review the note 1546009.
Regards,
Gaurav

Report to track the G/L details of all the conditions being posted to FI

Hi Friends,
We are using SAP ECC 6.0 RE-FX module.
We have a requirement wherein we would like to get the details of the G/L account being posted through RE-FX Periodic Posting activity.                                                                                In the current design, while we carry out Periodic Posting for any Contract, through T Code RERAPP, the Rent for the period is first posted to a single G/L Account(Central G/L) irrespective of the nature of Rental Income. Subsequently, when we carry out the Transfer Posting, it gets posted to the respective Revenue G/L depending upon the Account Determination Value (Food & Beverage/Advertisement/Miscellaneous/Parking) assigned to it.
We have Conditions Types which have been assigned to Contract, Rental Object Group and Rental Object. To these Condition Types, we assign the Posting Term/s, to which the Account Determination Value.
My query is has anyone worked on a similar requirement and if someone can help me on the Tables to be used in order to achieve the same.
Thanks in advance,
Pankaj

Hi,
Please find the condition, flow and distrution tables of RE-FX.
VICDCFOBJ     Object-Related     Cash     Flow
VICDCFPAY     Payment-Related     Cash     Flow
VICDCOND     Condition
VICDCONDCALC     Conditions     -     Calculation     Factors     and     Condi
VICDCONDDIST     Conditions     -     Distribution     Factors     and     Tran
VICN01     Real     Estate     Contract:     Contract     Data
VICN02     Real     Estate     Contract:     Resubmission     Data     OL
VICN03     Real     Estate     Contract:     Posting     Distribution
Thanks,
Bala Cheruvu.

Email messages from my personal email account are being posted (copied) to SMS messages. I have a new cell device, and this is happening on the new device also. The copy/forward to SMS is NOT being initiated by my email provider. How do I end this?

Email messages from my personal email account are being posted (copied) to SMS messages. I have a new cell device (swtched from Droid to iPhone) and this is happening on the new device also. The copy/forward to SMS is NOT being initiated by my email provider, and not by Gmail. How do I end ûVerizon's forwarding my personal email to SMS?
Thanks.

Maybe I'm missing something but how can Verizon have control over your personal GMail account? Sounds like you do have your email set up to forward to sms.
I have certain emails that are forwarded to me as SMS but that is an option that is enabled on the email side of things and is independent from Verizon.

Prevent oracle r12 legal entity from being posted in another ledger

Given the following:
Ledger = Ireland
Legal Entity:
Germany =123 segment 1
France= 456 segment 1
Ledger=Hong Kong
Legal entity=Hong Kong=789 segment 1
The Ireland ledger is intended for Euro based companies, the Hong Kong for HKD
I want to prevent any journal entries that have a segment1 789 from being posted in the Ireland Ledger, and segment 1 of 123 and 456 from being posted in the Hong Kong ledger.
How does one do this?

Looks like you are sharing a chart of account structure between the two ledger or at least you are sharing the segment 1 value set between the two ledgers.
Once you defined your ledgers, create and assign respective legal entities to your ledgers.
Associate Legal Entity Hong Kong to the ledger Hong Kong.
Associate Legal Entities Germany and France to the ledger Ireland.
Make sure you also assign balancing segment values to the legal entities associated with your ledgers.
Assign 789 to Legal Entity Hong Kong (associated with the ledger Hong Kong)
Assign 123 to Legal Entity Germany (associated with the ledger Ireland)
Assign 456 to Legal Entity France (associated with the ledger Ireland)
Once you assign the balancing segment values to the legal entities, system will not let you use any other balancing segment values (that are not assigned to the legal entities associated with your ledger). This will prevent 789 from being used in Ireland Ledger, and 123 and 456 from being used in Hong Long Ledger.
Hope that helps.
Hasan
Learn Oracle Financials Through Video Demonstrations at http://handsonerp.com

How the SAC amounts are posted to G/L accounts through Inbound Invoic Idocs

Hi EDI/ABAP experts,
Can anyone please tell me wow the SAC amounts are posted to G/L accounts through Inbound Invoic Idocs??
Can anyone point me to the code that permits INVOIC02 IDocs to post the SAC (service allowances and Charge) amount to particular G/L account??
What is the logic??
Thanks,
Creasy
Edited by: Creasy Matthew on Apr 27, 2009 10:41 PM

Hi Sunil,
When ever you prepare a billing document it creates an entry in General Ledger as Trial Balance has to be generated for the company all the expenses for a company should be recorded in GL. So that a company can see view their profit/loss figures.
As Billing is a sales related transaction it creates an GL Entry where in
Debits    --> Customer Account
Credit     --> Sales Revenue Account
And when the Customer Makes a payment with reference to the bill
One more GL Entry will be created i.e
Debit     --> Bank Account
Credit    --> Customer Account
With this we can track the customer balance (What ever balance is there in Customer account is customer Balance)
I think this is very clear with respect to the question you had asked.
Reward points if it helps.
Regards,
Sreekanth

FI Report showing Discount amount before posting a Document

We are paying Vendor's invoices. While creating document, we enter Discount base amount and payment terms. Discount amount appears only after document is posted. Is there any way I can print/display discount amount before posting the document?
Thank you

Ashok, it's F-43 to create a Vendor Invoice. After creating, when you display the document through FB03, on screen 302, you will find Disc Base, payment term. The Disc Amount would be blank, as it is not yet posted.
Thanks

Break up of CKME revaluation amount...

Hi Gurus,
After the execution of CKME (release planned price changes) system gives the revaluation amount(total figure). Can any one please let me know, is there any report to see the break up of revalaution amount by material.
Regards,
Inayat A Khan.

Hi Gurus,
Can anyone please reply my query, its very urgent.

Some amounts was posted to Price Diff Account even tho there was no price d

Hi Experts,
Users have a few AP Invoice which they have some typo, thus they canceled it by copying the whole invoice to AP Credit Note (w/o changing anything).
But when they try to cancel it, it says u201CGL Account is missingu201D.
After I try to search high and low for this GL Account, I couldnu2019t find anything. Thus I asked the users to u201CRight click > Duplicateu201D the rows in the AP Credit Note (delete the original), and then I was able to add it successfully OK.
But after the AP Credit Note is added, we checked back the JE posted by system, we realized some amount was posted to the u201CPrice Difference Accountu201D (which is not correct, because there was no price differences between the invoice and cn at all).
Have you experienced smth like this before?
Warmest Regards,
Chinho

Hi Chin,
The target Document uses the same G/L accounts than the Base Document, and maybe the G/L account was entered in the Account Determination after the Invoice was added.
regards
Carin
Edited by: Carin Botha on Jun 1, 2010 9:56 AM

Managing revaluation amounts after manual period closing for a material

Hello everyone,
We implemented [Note 645083 - Material period status set to "Closing Entry Completed"|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/645083], along with [Note 364368 - Material ledger help desk|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/364368] as instructed in the former. Then we ran MLHELP_DELETE_UMBEW and saw that revaluation amounts do exist, which we are supposed to move to a revaluation account. So here comes the question: Where are these amounts now, in a price difference account? Also, how do I manage them afterwards, just leave them on the revaluation account?
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
the correct closing of the previous period would have moved the revaluation amounts to the price difference accounts in the current period. But if you change the status manually, these revaluation amounts have to be deleted manually. Otherwise the single-level settlement will not work for the current period. The revaluation amounts will not be used for the actual costing in the current period and would remain on the respective accounts.
Report MLHELP_DELETE_UMBEW can be run in update mode only by SAP Support. If you want these revaluation amounts to be deleted, please create a message (component CO-PC-ACT).

Batch Quantity is being posted incorrectly in WM stock

Hi Experts,
I would like to share you a question about the batches are being created in the SAP system... When the user does movement type 101 from P.O, the quantity is being posted correctly in Quality Status - MM Inventory but in WMS Stock, a small part is being posted in Available Quantity status and the biggest part from the batch is being posted in Pick Quantity incorrectly. We would like the total quantity from Batch be posted in Available Quantity in WM... We don't know if this error is about some Master Data QM is missing or some configuration incorrectly from QM... For this reason, I was wondering if you could help us with this issue?
Please if you need more details I'd be glad to inform you.
Thanks a lot,
BR
Valdevair

Basically because you have a destructive sample requirement, the system is making a WH request to deal with that quantity of sample. So you have two orders to deal with. One to pull or process the sample qty and the other to put away the remaining qty.
In bulk products we don't usually track the qty's. Since .001 kg out of several hundred KG's is basically insignificant, unless you deal in something like precious metals.
If your UOM was 1L bottles however and you ordered 8000 kgs or roughly 1000 bottles, you might want to show the one bottle as having been consumed since it would indeed throw your inventoy count off. In that case you sampling UOM would be a bottle.
FF

BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE - posting extra lines (amount being multiplied by 100)

Hello Gurus,
I am using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE for posting.
When I check FBL3N, i see 2 lines:
The first one is correct while the second is a copy of the first one, with the exeception that the amount in Local Currency has been multiplied by 100. And this second line is not required.
I am passing only one line to the BAPI and I get 2 lines as output.
Has anyone encountered this problem before?
Thanks for your precious help.
Regards,
Parvez

Hello,
Here are some more information:
goodsmvt_code-gm_code    = '02'.
goodsmvt_item-move_type      = '101'.
The posting done in NISL is in fact done twice in SAP ECC6 :
a)      at normal standard price of the materials
b)      at standard price * 100 (current issue).
In 46C version, the posting was done only once at the standard price of the material. (correct)
In SAP ECC6, 2 postings are done:
            - Posting a) correct.
            - Posting b) multiplied by 100 should not exist. This error should be corrected.
seem to be related to the upgrade?
Any hint on this?
Thanks

No Revaluation Amount being posted in CKMLCP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for