No session per user

hello
our application uses UIX + BC4J (jdev 9.0.5.2)
we are using JAZN for authentication through Oracle OID
How can i prevent a specific OID user from loggin more than once to the application... I cannot use Oracle profiles as Oracle profile use database users. All our users have the same URL in JDBC and hence the same database user
please help

Hi,
U can do that with Profile.
Check the table dba_profiles, u'll find SESSION_PER_USER in the
field RESOURCE_NAME.
If u want different value for each user, make one profile by
user.
Bye,
Fred DENIS

Similar Messages

  • Limit the number of session per user in the Wired dot1x environment with ISE 1.2

    Hello,
    I need to check if there is any configuration/workaround to limit the number of sessions/access per user in the Wired dot1x configuration.
    I need to check if this feature is available or not to solve the following scenario:
    I have 2 SW ports configured to use dot1x authentication with ISE 1.2 server.
    If user A connects to the 1st port and authenticated then he will placed on a VLAN based on the authorization profile.
    The case, that I need to deny the same user to connect on a different machine with the same credentials.
    The ISE itself does not have this feature currently,  the only feature available is to limit the number of sessions for the guest user.
    Is there any workaround on the Cisco switches to solve this? Cisco WLC has this feature and for the VPN we can limit the number of sessions also from the ASA itself.
    Thanks.

    limit number of session per user using wired dot1x is not available in 1.3

  • Clustered WL 6.1 creates 2 server sessions per user

              It appears that WL 6.1 creates 2 HTTP sessions per user for a simple JSP object.
              It shows in "ADmin Console/mydomain> DefaultWebApp> Web Applications> DefaultWebApp>
              Servlet Runtimes":
              1 /count.jsp
              1 /*.jsp
              In a non-clustered environment this does not happen.
              Is that normal?
              

    I found the problem myself. For some reason WL did not like any special characters in the system password. I am not sure which ones are valid and which are not but I am avoiding them all right now.

  • Single Database Session Per User in ADF/BC Application

    Hi, I am using ADF with BC (JDeveloper 11.1.1.1). My application contains multiple application modules, each connected to the same JDBC data source. On the app server, I have configured the data source to use Identity Based Connection Pooling.
    My current configuration is resulting in numerous database sessions for each user. I have a requirement to use only a single database session per user HTTP session. Is there any way to configure the application modules to achieve this?
    Thanks,
    Brad

    Hi,
    use a single root Am module and make sure the others are used as nested modules. This will create a single connection
    Frank

  • No of Concurrent Sessions Per User  Mismatch with profile settings

    Hi
    DB Version Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
    OS RHES 5U2
    I created a profile MYPROFILE and set the value of Concurrent Sessions (Per User) to 30. DB was bounced after creating the profile. I made this profile default for a particular user "MYUSER". I verified that by querying DBA_USERS (select profile from dba_users where username like 'MYUSER') I checked v$session with that particular user after sometime and noticed that it was showing 34 sessions. Some ACTIVE and some INACTIVE.
    My question is, if I have set the maximum limit of concurrent sessions per user to 30 in myprofile and made this the default profile for MYUSER, then how come i am still able to see more than 34 sessions of myuser regardless of the status? I am not sure if this is relevant or not but the IDLE TIME is set to 15 minutes.
    Thank you for your help
    Edited by: user560883 on Jul 4, 2010 12:45 AM

    user560883 wrote:
    Hi
    DB Version Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
    OS RHES 5U2
    I created a profile MYPROFILE and set the value of Concurrent Sessions (Per User) to 30. DB was bounced after creating the profile. I made this profile default for a particular user "MYUSER". I verified that by querying DBA_USERS (select profile from dba_users where username like 'MYUSER';) I checked v$session with that particular user after sometime and noticed that it was showing 34 sessions. Some ACTIVE and some INACTIVE.
    My question is, if I have set the maximum limit of concurrent sessions per user to 30 in myprofile and made this the default profile for MYUSER, then how come i am still able to see more than 34 sessions of myuser regardless of the status? I am not sure if this is relevant or not but the IDLE TIME is set to 15 minutes.
    Thank you for your helpDid you set the parameter resource_limit=true ? You must do it before you test sessions_per_user. You can do so like the following,
    alter system set resource_limit=true;After this again try and post the feedback.
    HTH
    Aman....

  • Maximum Number of Sessions per User

    I am using OAM 11.1.1.5.0 running on Solaris 10. When we change the "Maximum Number of Sessions per User" to 1 (per customer requirement), a user is restricted to having one active OAM session at a time (as expected). However, if the user does not explicitly log out (e.g. they just close their browser), they are unable to log back in to OAM until their existing OAM session times-out/expires. Given the above max sessions of 1 requirement, is it possible to config OAM to auto-kill the user's session and create a new one if they attempt to login before their initial OAM session times-out/expires? This was possible in Sun's Access Manager. Is it possible in Oracle's OAM? Thank you in advance for your reply.

    Hi,
    Maximum session per user 0-9 and how can configure see the below link:-
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/97/76a341ac57ef0be10000000a1550b0/content.htm
    Regards,
    Anil

  • How to realize only one identical remoteApp per session per user per computer?

    If a terminalserver 2008 R1 is configured for only one session per user, everything works like it should if the user connects using the 'normal' remotedesktop session. A second connect with the same credentials kicks the first connect.
    If a remoteApp is used instead of the 'normal' connect, it's possible to start multiple instances of this app within one user a least from one computer. mstsc do run multiple times and seem to link in the existent connection without kicking it. How to change
    that?
    Continuative:
    The started RemoteApp checks the mutex of all started processes and stops herself if a process is found with the same mutex. This prevents multiple instances of this app within one user with the same sessionID. If a terminalserver is configured for only
    one session per user, this RemoteApp shouldn't start multiple within one user. Using a "normal" remote desktop session the app doesn't start more than one time, I tested it. Used as RemotApp, the app starts multiple! Possibly I'm able to change this behaviour
    with a code fix instead of configuring terminal services. Any tips regarding mutex and terminalservers?

    Hi,
    I tested the following code and it is working for me both in a RemoteApp and Full session:
    Imports System.Threading
    Module Main
    Sub Main()
    Dim createdNew As Boolean
    Dim m As New Mutex(True, "TPMutex", createdNew)
    If Not createdNew Then
    Return
    End If
    Application.Run(Form1)
    GC.KeepAlive(m)
    End Sub
    End Module
    -TP

  • Session per user = 1 is not working in database ?

    Dear All,
    A profile has been configured on database with parameter session_per_user=1 but it is not working on database.
    user can make n number of session to database . what could be the reason profile is not working ?
    Please sugeest the solution .....
    Regards,
    Rajesh
    Edited by: Rajesh.Rathod on Mar 17, 2009 3:34 AM

    You have to alter resource_limit to true
    Look fo rmore details in metalink note 745752.1

  • Can't limit the number of simultaneous sessions per user

    Hi,
    I am using Cisco ACS 4.0 as a radius server that authenticate users for Internet access.
    Microsoft ISA 2004 is used as Radius client.
    When users tries to connect to Internet, the ISA Server forwards requests to Radius server (Cisco ACS) for authentication.
    I have constated that some users communicates their passwords to permit acces to Internet for non authorized users.
    Even, I have selected Max Sessions property in Cisco ACS to 1 for every user, I can see clearly on ISA 2004 that the same user/password is used from multiple PCs simultaneously.
    Internet acess on my company is based on a user / password authentication, and IP adresses are provided by DHCP server.
    Can you help by advising me how to limit every user using the internet to only a single session at any time, by using ISA 2004 (proxy) and Cisco ACS 4.0 (Radius Server).
    Thank you.
    Mustapha.

    Limiting every user using the internet to only a single session at a time is not possible with a radius server. You will need to use the proxy server (ISA server) for this task.

  • Single session per user

    To demo my product, I put usernames and passwords right on the login page. I don't want people getting confused by the result when the same user is trying to do two different transactions, so I'd like to restrict each username to one session at a time. If someone tries to login with a username already in use, I need to reject their login.
    Is there a way to do this?
    Thanks.
    Bill

    Bill,
    Better keep that PayPal account up-to-date. Sounds to me like you don't want SQL executed within any HTML DB session to be able to delete/update the same rows in tables or insert new rows when the timeframe between session creation and logout (or the final page visit of the session, e.g., user closes browser) overlaps with the similarly bounded timeframe of another HTML DB session.
    HTML DB can't help you with this, there is no concept of an "active" session or "session in use".
    You'd have to do something like insert a row into an ACCOUNT_IN_USE table when one of your accounts is "logged into", then delete the row when the logout takes place. Insert the row using a new process on the login page (raise error on dup key) and delete the row when the user clicks a logout link that should take them a logout confirmation page, which when submitted, deletes the row and redirects to the logout URL that you currently see in the Logout navbar icon. Replace the target of that navbar icon with a link to your new logout page. And then manually run a reset procedure to delete all the rows after so many users have not "actively" logged out but just closed their browsers and went home.
    Scott

  • Problem: Multiple sessions per user (automatic) ?

    Hi guys,
    I have a very bad behavior with multiple sessions in SRM 4.0 sp8.
    The problem is:
    1. When the employee enter into the system one session is created
    2. The same employee click the "Shop" link and a 2nd. session is created for the same user !
    3. The same employee click the catalog link (CCM) and a 3rd. session is created !
    Anybody knows how to solve this ?  
    Thank you !!!
    Kind regards,
    diego

    Diego
    When you logged in first time, it creates one session.
    But after that if you navigate to different transactions it shows in the second session.But it does not open new session for each link(ie Shop, confirmation, etc). Instead old session closes and new session opens.
    When it comes to CCM, obviously new session opens as you are connecting to new application by keeping open the existing one(Shop).
    But how does it matter to your application?
    Does it show any impact on the performance?
    Regards
    Jagadish

  • Enabling single session per user

    I am using the following to load the event
    java oracle.apps.fnd.wf.WFXLoad -u appluser @ppluser 10.3.4.45.+preprod.ke.dipl.com:1562:TEST thin US \ $FND_TOP/patch/115/xml/US/icxevte.wfx
    and getting the error
    Connecting to [email protected]+preprod.ke.dipl.com:1562:TEST -- UTF8
    Unable to connect to 10.3.4.45.+preprod.ke.dipl.com:1562:TEST
    appluser is the application user name, @ppluser the password, 10.3.4.45 ip (single node) preprod.ke.dipl.com the fully qualified domain name TEST the SID

    Please post the details of the application release, database version and OS.
    java oracle.apps.fnd.wf.WFXLoad -u appluser @ppluser 10.3.4.45.+preprod.ke.dipl.com:1562:TEST thin US \ $FND_TOP/patch/115/xml/US/icxevte.wfx
    and getting the error
    Connecting to [email protected]+preprod.ke.dipl.com:1562:TEST -- UTF8
    Unable to connect to 10.3.4.45.+preprod.ke.dipl.com:1562:TEST
    appluser is the application user name, @ppluser the password, 10.3.4.45 ip (single node) preprod.ke.dipl.com the fully qualified domain name TEST the SIDPlease source the application env file before running this command. Also, make sure you pass the correct SID, Database port number, database IP Address (or hostname).
    The correct syntax is:
    $ java oracle.apps.fnd.wf.WFXLoad -u apps <apps password> <host>:<port>:<SID> "thin" US $FND_TOP/patch/115/xml/US/icxevte.wfx
    Interview Notifications are not Working in Release 12.1 [ID 1065114.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Per Session / per User shaping and queuing not working on 7206/7204 on 15.2

    Hello,
    we are running the following scenario - to provide QoS (shaping/queueing) for our broadband (pppoe) users, we have configured several service-policies on our 7206/7204 BRAS-Routers. The service-policies are applied with RADIUS-Attributes when the pppoe-users dials in. The service-policies look like this
    policy-map POL-BM-DEF-P_4m-DSCP-OUT
     description << Parent Policy 4 mbps >>
     class class-default
      shape average 3900000
      bandwidth 3900
       service-policy POL-BM-DEF-C_4m-DSCP-OUT
    policy-map POL-BM-DEF-C_4m-DSCP-OUT
     description << Child Policy 4 mbps >>
     class CM-VO-DEF-DSCP
      priority 900
      police cir 900000
       conform-action transmit
       exceed-action drop
     class CM-VS-DEF-DSCP
      bandwidth 100
     class CM-ID-DEF-DSCP
      bandwidth 900
     class CM-MS-DEF-DSCP
      bandwidth 600
     class CM-MC-DEF-DSCP
      bandwidth 300
     class CM-NC-DEF-DSCP
      bandwidth 150
     class CM-NM-DEF-DSCP
      bandwidth 150
     class class-default
      bandwidth 800
    We are applying the policies with the following Cisco-AV-Pair attribute
    lcp:interface-config=service-policy output POL-BM-DEF-P_4m-DSCP-OUT
    Until recently that did work pretty good when using software 12.2(33)SRC3. But it turned out that there is a bug in this software that causes that the policy is applied but not working correct sometimes. See bug CSCsv27825. Although that bug does not match the software we are using, the symptoms do. Basically the parent shaper is not working, so there is no backpressure, no need for qos to kick in ;-)
    The recommendation was to upgrade to Version 15.2(4)M5. When downloading the image there was a recommendation on the website to use Version 15.2(4)M6 instead, because of some important bugfixes. So we installed that, system cmes back online, everything works - except the service-policies. they are not applied at all any more.
    After doing some tests it turns out that
    - Policies that shape are not applied. It does not matter if using the ip:sub-qos-policy-out=xxx or lcp:interface-config=service-policy output xxx attribute.
    - Policies that police like the one here are applied
    policy-map POL-POLICE-DEF-P_1M-DSCP-OUT
     class class-default
      police 1000000
    We prefer the shaping way, because of the smoother handling of bursty traffic.
    Any ideas/recommendations ? I've tbeen readign a litte bit on the internet - that problem is not new, but unfortunately no one has a solution :-(
    Best regards
    Carsten
    Short update: as soon as some queuing configuration is present in the policy (parent and/or child) it is not applied. i tried to be extra clever and combine the "policer" parent policy with our child-policy which does priority queuing - not applied. Even the parent-policy alone with no child policy (just the shaper)  is not gettign applied.
    Any ideas what to debug to get a reason why it is not working ?

    Please Ignore Spelling errors. "I asked" replaced "It asked".
    Please Reply as soon as Possible !

  • Permit only one access per user on guest portal Cisco ISE

    Hi,
    Could you please help me to figure it out if it´s possible to create a guest account on cisco ISE which permit only one concurrent access?
    We don't want to have multiple devices registering with the same account, just one different account for each device.
    Thanks,

    Hi Gino,
    You  can restrict guests to having only one device connected to the network  at a time. When guests attempt to connect with a second device, the  currently-connected device is automatically disconnected from the  network.
    This is a global setting affecting all Guest portals.
    Step 1 Choose Administration > Web Portal Management > Settings > Guest > Portal Policy.
    Step 2 Check the Allow only one guest session per user option.
    Step 3 Click Save.

  • How to set session timeout per user

    Hi,
    Ho do I set the session timeout per User in the
    Application.cfm File??
    I tried using
    <cfif SESSION.UID EQ 1>
    <CFAPPLICATION NAME="appControl" SESSIONMANAGEMENT="Yes"
    sessiontimeout="#CreateTimeSpan(0,0,20,0)#">
    </cfelse>
    <CFAPPLICATION NAME="appControl" SESSIONMANAGEMENT="Yes"
    sessiontimeout="#CreateTimeSpan(1,0,0,0)#">
    </cfif>
    But this didnt work because the cfapplication seems to have
    to be at the top before I call the variable SESSION.UID which
    I set on my login page..
    Someone know how to do this??
    Regards
    Martin

    Martin,
    Your code example cannot work because the "session" scope
    doesn't exist until your application scope is defined. So you have
    to handle this manually. Here's how you can get it done. First,
    define your application to the maximum sessiontimeout you want to
    have.
    <CFAPPLICATION NAME="appControl" SESSIONMANAGEMENT="Yes"
    SESSIONTIMEOUT="#CreateTimeSpan(1,0,0,0)#">
    Then, I don't know how you are doing your login
    authentication but when you have authenticated the user, you need
    to define the userid and the most recent activity in the session.
    Also determine your timeout value based on the userid. See example:
    <CFIF IS_AUTHENTICATED>
    <CFSET session.user.uid = form.userid>
    <CFSET session.user.most_recent_activity = now()>
    <CFIF session.user.id eq 1>
    <CFSET session.user.timeout_mins = 20>
    <CFELSE>
    <CFSET session.user.timeout_mins = 1440>
    </CFIF>
    </CFIF>
    Now, all you have to do is check whether the user has been
    idle for too long and kill the session by purging all session
    variables. For example:
    <!--- if user id is defined, this means user is logged in
    --->
    <CFIF structKeyExists(session, "user") and
    structKeyExists(session.user, "id")>
    <!--- check if timeout has expired --->
    <CFIF datediff("n", session.user.most_recent_activity,
    now()) gt session.user.timeout_mins>
    <!--- timeout has expired, kill the session and log the
    user out --->
    <CFSET StructClear(session)>
    <!--- insert your logout code here --->
    <CFELSE>
    <!--- user hasn't timed out, so reset the most recent
    activity to now --->
    <CFSET session.user.most_recent_activity = now()>
    </CFIF>
    </CFIF>

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is there a way that to make text look like it is being written on the screen?

    I once saw a tiltle (using the font edwardian script) that looked like it was being written on the screen. I tried using the linear wipe transition, but this does not make the full effect i want.. for instance, when you make a letter "t" in cursive,

  • VPRS condition type in Third party sales

    Hi We have the following scenario for 3rd party sales: 1. SO is created which generates a PR 2. PO is created.  Example below Base price - 100 Freight - 10 Insurance - 10 3. GR is done with below a/c entry COGS Dr 120 Clearing Cr 120 4. IR is done (R

  • Moving Pages using Tags

    I have always found moving pages around in Acrobat documents to be a pain. I thought I might be able to use tags or some other form of document structure to move pages around. In the help section related to tagging, the help states: Add tagged bookma

  • SRM Workflow

    Dear Sir/Madam,    We are facing problem in Workflow. In Tata Steel We have Implemented 5 Level Workflow Approval. But at the Time of Approval of 5 th Level (Final level) Approval Button(Green Button) appearing as Gray So that Approver is not able to

  • HELP ON PDF CUSTOM PAGE SIZE

    Is there any way to save a 5.5" x 8.5" publisher file to the same sized pdf pages....??? I have Windows Vista and Adobe Reader 8. I have a 348 page cookbook ready to publish, but the cookbook publisher wants it saved to pdf in the print-page size....