No stock in MB5B quality but  appering in BW(urgent)

Hi experts,
we have come across an incident where the is no stock in R/3 MB5B quality, but when we executed the report in BW it is showing stock in quality for some material and plant combination.initially i thought the stock might have moved from quality to some warehouse after pulling to BW side but the stock qualtity and values are different fot the same mat-plant combination in r/3 and bw can you guys tell me how these variences occured.
regards.
Moses.

hi,
chk if the compression of the cube is done for all the request ,especially for the init loads.
Ramesh

Similar Messages

  • Stock on MB5B

    Hi,
    I´m having a problem with material stock. I get two different values on MB5B and MBEWH table for the same material, plant and date.
    Material: TP05891070
    Company code: 531
    Plant: 7101
    Selection Date: 01.01.2008 to 31.01.2008
    On MB5B, I get:
    Stock/Value on  01.01.2008   14,203.100KG    374,010.90 PEN
    Total/Val. of Receipts             5,541.900KG     94,518.53 PEN
    Total/Value of Issues             19,745.000KG    468,549.25 PEN
    Stock/Value on  31.01.2008    0.000KG            19.82- PEN
    On MBEWH table, I get:
    TP05891070      2007        12       14,203.100 KG         374,010.90PEN
    TP05891070      2008        01        0.000KG            0.00PEN
    Why is there a difference on Final Stock for 01.2008?
    From which table or report does MB5B get -19.82?
    I was looking all tables MB5B use, but I haven´t found that value.
    I hope u can help me. Thanks!
    Jocelyne
    Edited by: Jocelyne Garibaldi on Sep 18, 2008 11:01 PM

    MB5B calculates backwards from today all the material documents and arrives at the stock quantities. The stock values are the values associated with each material document, either debit or credit. Apart from the material documents the price change documents (which get generated when MR21 is done) also will be taken into account for arriving at stock value.
    I think probably price change (MR21) might have been done on back date after 31.01.08.
    Regards,
    GSL.

  • Problem in BAPI for stock posting from quality inspection  to unrestricted usage

    Hi all,
    I am using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE for  stock posting from quality inspection  to unrestricted usage Stock against quality inspection lot(not by MB1B) using mvt type 321.The material doc gets created by the BAPI,but actual stock posting is not taking place ie.the stock doesn’t get reflected in QA33/32 and QA11 also .Can any one suggest what must be wrong?The inputs given are as follows:
    GOODSMVT_HEADER:
    PSTNG_DATE =30/07/2014, DOC_DATE = 30/07/2014, REF_DOC_NO = INSP LOT NO.
    GOODSMVT_CODE:
    GM_CODE:  ‘04’ .
    GOODSMVT_ITEM:
    MATERIAL = MATERIAL NO
    PLANT = PLANTCODE
    STGE_LOC = ‘WIP’
    BATCH = BATCHNO
    MOVE_TYPE   = ‘321’
    ENTRY_QNT = 100
    ENTRY_UOM =  ‘EA’
    ORDERID =  Prd ord no.
    After executing this I used BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT also. I am able to see the posted qty in MMBE,but it is not reflecting in QA11/33/32.
    Kindly help me.

    Hi Naveen,
    Thanks for the reply. Even after using FM QAVE_PROCESS_AUTO_UD,when i execute
    BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE, the same thing is happening.I am unable to see the stock deducted in QA33.
    Is there any input in the goods mvt bapi where we can provide inspection lot no since i believe that the goods mvt has to get connected with the inspection lot.

  • After UD stock is in Quality stock

    Hi All,
       I am getting a problem with the Inspection lot, After doing UD for the inspection lot , System status is showing   UD   ICCO SPCO STUP HUM means stock posting is completed but actually the stock is not moving from quality stock to Unrestricted stock. Can anyone help in this problem?
    Neel

    Hello Neel,
    Did it happened  in one of the 4.6 version of SAP ? I guess I have seen something similar in 4.6C earlier ? If it  is has happened as one of the case then perform the posting in QA12 but if it  is been observed quite often then I will suggest to raise an OSS note as the lots status is already 'Stock posting completed'.
    Cheers
    Kaushik

  • Weird Problem in QM stock posting from Quality Stock to Unrestricted

    Hi all,
    Today I hit a weird problem in SAP and struck there for the past 5 hours. The problem is,
    I have a batch managed material, for which QM view is available. 01 inspection type is activated along with the "Post to Inspection Stock indicator" for that material in material master.
    Now I am creating a Purchase order and doing a goods receipt in MIGO. Then it creates a inspection lot of type 01
    for this material and puts the stock in to Quality stock (I checked in MMBE).
    Now as per standard SAP behaviour, if I want to move the stock from Quality to Unrestricted, I can only do it in QA11 trasaction through Inspection stock tab. If I try to do 321 (Quality to Unrestricted) movement in MIGO, the system will send an error message "Change the inspection stock of material XXXXXXX in QM only"
    But in my case, I am not getting this error message, the system is still allowing me to move the stock from Quality to Unrestricted thorugh MIGO using 321 movement. This is not standard and I don't want this.
    This behavior is seen in 04 and 08 inspection lots also (with post to insp stock indicator).
    The aftermath of this problem, if I do a MIGO transfer posting of say 100 PC through 321. The system is correspondingly updating the MMBE transaction by moving this 100 PC from Quality stock to Unrestricted. But if I go to QA11 and check, the QM still shows that 100 PC to be in Quality stock itself, thus creating a mis-match between actual stock situation and the stock situation in QM.
    I already checked and most of the SPRO nodes and I am left clueless. One more thing, Usage Decision is not yet done for the inspection lot and it is just REL status. Also thee are no developments or enhancements in QM module in my project. Only 1 enhancement relating to custom sample label and rest of all the functionality is standard.
    Sorry for the long post. How to correct this? Please help me!
    Thanks in advance,
    Vinodh

    I don't know why this happenned.  Look at the QM view of the material master and see if the "inspection setup" flag on the QM view is clicked on.  That is usually greyed out and is set by having an inspection type activated.  You can't manually set that once an inspection type is added.  But that is the indicator I believe is used to determine if regular stock movements are allowed for QM stocks.
    I would try to first clear all your inspection lots first.
    Then delete all the inspection types from the material.  And I mean actually go in and delete them. 
    Then use QA08 to reactivate the ones you need.
    Then see if this solves the problem.
    FF

  • I would like to connect my Apple TV 3rd gen to a projector and not an HD TV (so I can watch movies on the big screen). Are there any decent price compatible projectors? Good quality but not professional! Many thanks

    I would like to connect my Apple TV 3rd gen to a projector and not an HD TV (so I can watch movies on the big screen). Are there any decent price compatible projectors? Good quality but not professional! Many thanks

    Thank you for the answer, I suppose the main thrust of my enquiry is to find out if 65 MBits is my ATV theoretical limit of reception.  If that is the case then I am happy as a Pig in Mud
    I may have allowed myself to become a victim by listening to Fanbois posting elsewhere who always seem to go one better than everyone else. Now I have learnt two things Today; 65Mbit/s = Good enough and only read the apple forums.
    Many Thanks
    Nick

  • Query running in Quality but not in Production

    Hi Folks,
    we are running a query AQICSDUSERS=====MOVEMENTLIST4= which used to get executed previously,but all of a sudden now after running for an hour or so it is coming back to  sap easy access screen without displaying the report.It is running and giving the report in Quality but not in Production.
    What could be the reason?
    K.Kiran.

    Hi Folks,
    From DUMP I got this:-
    <b>You should usually execute long-running programs as batch jobs.
    If this is not possible, increase the system profile parameter
    "rdisp/max_wprun_time".</b>
    I want to know how to increase the system profile parameter
    "rdisp/max_wprun_time".
    Thanks,
    K.Kiran.

  • IDOC - message type WMMBXY(Stock transfer from quality to unrestricted)

    Hi Gurus,
    I have IDOC problem.
    Inbound message type WMMBXY(Stock transfer from quality to unrestricted), The status if I check in WM02 of Doc is "51-Application document not posted"
    Error Message ""Required function
    MB_CREATE_GOODS_MOVEMENT is not being processed".
    Please Help.
    Prashant

    Hi
    The Idoc whcile Posting using Message type WMMBXY calls the Function module L_IDOC_INPUT_WMMBXY & in turn this calls the function module MB_CREATE_GOODS_MOVEMENT.
    This function is not getting executed.
    Please check if the Movemnt type used is not active for WM movemnts.
    If you have used previously this movemnt type & now it is not working. Please take hlep of ABAPer  for debugging & finding the Root cause
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • Stock Type X Quality Inspection in Production Orders

    Hello,
    I have the material 123EDFXXX that the Production order has set the Stock Type =X (Quality Inspection)...
    We don´t know how was that set!! since that material has not active the QM Views in the material master.
    There is another master data (prod version, route) or something else that is coping that value??

    Hi Marco,
    1.Pl check if QM was active before the creation of order.If so you need to delete all Material and accounting documents
    2. Check in the work scheduling view in material master if the inspection stock is active box is active.then this could be the reason.
    Regards
    George

  • Stock lying in Quality from LQUA

    Hi All,
       How  do  i determine the  Stock lying in Quality/Returns/Blocked from LQUA  ....? I mean among  the below set of fields  which can give me Q- stock , Blocked , return stock etc (for WM)
    LQUA-BESTQ  =
    space   available stock
    Q     Stock in quality control
    R     Returns stock
    S     Blocked stock
        GESME
        VERME
        EINME
        AUSME
    Any other improvement tips ..
    Regards
    Jaman
    Message was edited by:
            ABAP Techie
    Message was edited by:
            ABAP Techie
    Message was edited by:
            ABAP Techie
    Message was edited by:
            ABAP Techie

    Hello ABAP techie,
    Do you want to use this information in Report or some business transaction? What you are trying to achieve with this. This will help us to give better input.
    Regards
    Arif Mansuri

  • I can't synchronyze my contacts with my Iphone after the last update and I lost all my contact I can't find them I suppose they are stocked in my ICloud but I am not sure what I should do ????

    I can't synchronyze my contacts with my Iphone after the last update and I lost all my contact I can't find them I suppose they are stocked in my ICloud but I am not sure what I should do ????

    Hi jandroantonio,
    Welcome to Apple Support Communities.
    It sounds like your iPhone update may not have completed succesfully. Not to worry, we have an article with information on how to treat this symptom:
    iOS: Unable to update or restore
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1808
    Best,
    Jeremy

  • Moving Stock out of Quality Inspection

    Hi Guys,
    I have a slight issue that I need help with.
    First, let me explain the situation.
    I have a client that wants to use a 3rd party for their Inventory postings. They DO NOT want SAP Quality to move stock. Currently they have an Interface in place that sends the Stock postings via EDI. They never had Quality Management in place until now.
    So, now when they do a MIGO Goods Receipt on a Purchase Order it generates an 01 type inspection lot. I have turned off the movement on the Usage Decision so that SAP can't move the stock out of Quality when they close the lot. They want the Interface to move the stock from Quality to Unrestricted. Currently it errors out and says "can't move stock need to use QM only"....
    My question is......Besides updating the Inspection Lot via QA12. Is there ANY configuration settings I can work with to fix this? or Allow the "321" movement?
    Thanks so much

    No.  Stock must be moved via the inspection lot.  For a third party interface like that you'll have probably look at building something using the FM used by the external interfaces to SAP QM such as LIMS.
    This PDF file might help you.
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1ebb1361-0b01-0010-56aa-c780c5446963?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    FF

  • Can you re-import your CD's in high quality, but keep the original track data?

    Dear All
    I got roughly halfway through importing my collection of about 800 CD's into iTunes 12, before realising that the default import settings applied by iTunes is not 'the best'.  In fact it's not set anywhere near 'the best', it's something like 128kbps lossy format.   I wanted to import my CD's in lossless CD-quality.  WAV would have been ideal.  However it would appear I've missed a trick by assuming it would be full-quality unless I specified something else.
    I'm not using portable devices to listen to my music, I have a Mac Mini and an endless supply of hard-drive storage space, and I'm only accessing it at home.
    A large number of my discs are classical and jazz, and in many cases I've needed to amend or reorganise the metadata, so that it all complies with an overall filing and categorising system that makes sense and is useful.   I also have a large number of rock and blues CD's, but their metadata is normally correct when the discs are issued, so they usually doesn't need adjusting.   If you're wondering, yes my taste in music is eclectic.   I'm just as big a fan of Mozart as I am of Motorhead as I am of Mo Foster.   The problem is that with classical and opera it's important that the 'artist' category shows the names of the performer/soloist/conductor/orchestra, not the name of the composer!  (I wish I *did* have actual recordings of JS Bach playing the Well Tempered Clavier!!).
    So I'm looking at this big pile of CD's thinking, "is it worth re-importing them all again at CD-quality?", because I'd really like top-quality copies, and I only really want to have to do this once.   It *is* worth doing so long as I don't have to do all the jiggery-pokery with all the artist/composer data again, because that takes an enormous amount of time.
    So the question is... will iTunes 12 let me re-import my discs at maximum quality, but at the same time let me keep the data that was painstakingly edited and stored with the previous (lesser-quality) versions?   Or is there a workaround?  Maybe I could surreptitiously replace the old audio with new audio when iTunes isn't running and hope that it won't notice?
    It goes without saying that I have spent quite a while trying to do this for myself before asking the forum, and so far I've drawn a blank so I'd be very grateful for any expert thoughts and opinions.
    Best wishes
    Nick

    HI
    Don't use WAV format as you will not retain metadate. You should use aiff if space is not a problem but Apple lossles format will be just as good with smaller file size.
    When you reimport your CDS, you will be asked if you wish to replace existing copies. Select yes, you data changes should be retained. Be aware that when you reimport, CD track names and album title must match your existing files, otherwise they will not replace existing versions.
    Jim

  • Default stock type as quality inspection when i create Stock transport orde

    I want default stock type as quality inspection when i create Stock transport order with T-code Me21n.All the settings in he material master are maintained for inspection type 08. (donot wnat to change the  stock type manually,it should come as default)Please provide solution.

    Hi
    This is not QM setting this is Achieved by MM setting in SPRO.
    SPRO>MM>purchasing>PO>define screen layout at document level>select UBF(STO) or ME21n>overview>GR/IR control>
    select Qulaity inspection--> decheck the Opt Entry click on Display.
    This will solve your problem
    Regards
    Sujit

  • How to Export a WMV file in High Quality but low MB?

    How to Export a WMV file in High Quality but low MB?

    I'm really afraid you are the only person who can answer that.
    ANY compression is totally relative: what do you think is small? What do you define as high quality?
    I can get a 5 minute wmv file at just under 100mb that I find acceptable for browser downloads. You might think that's too big. I don't.
    Trial and error is the only way. Personally, I've set up a compressor preset to crunch my wmv files. While it's doing it's thing, I can do something else.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can't install Win7 with K8N Neo Platinum (MS-7030)

    Hi, with an XP system running smoothly on my old machine, I decided it's time for a Win7 installation. However, the Win7 installation crashes after first reboot with a BSOD some 20 seconds into the windows boot process (logo displayed). I suspect mis

  • Muvo nx deleted everything whe

    The battery level was already low. But before I changed batteries, I decided to delete the last item I was listening to. Right after pressing Delete, the unit simply powered-off. After replacing the battery, the unit powered up showing NO content! Ev

  • Is the guided point to point navigation really so ...

    I have tested Ovi maps 3 on my N82 for a week now here in Ireland.At least for using it here in Ireland I admit it's a nightmare. To get a distance of 800 meters from one corner of the road to another corner, I was suggested a 2.5 km route.(It's a ma

  • Erratic track pad pointer.

    Hi new to the community. First post. I have a 2012 Macbook Pro (15 inch). I am running OS X Yosemite. For no reason at all, all of a sudden the track pad arrow is erratic and highlights words and gives the dictionary definition, moves the pages aroun

  • To Change Techinical settings without having SE13 authorization

    Hi Gurus, I am creating a custom table but i do not have authorization for changing technical settings. It is giving error message No authorization for transaction SE13. I know that we can do it in debug mode.I tried that but it's not working. Please