No (suitable) purchase order/item found for MR11

Hi,
I am trying to do an MR11 on a PO but it says that there is no PO found. But when I look at the PO history there is an entry in Total variances through IR. Then why does it say there is nothing to do MR11 for?
The PO quantity is 440.030
The GR Quantity is 440.030
The IR quantity is 450.310
There is a variance of 18,481.48 in the amount. And that is what i am trying to do an MR11 for. Could it be because there is not Open PO quantity?
Thanks,
Jograd

Hi,
check is there any tolerance set for IR.
Regards
Ravi shankar.

Similar Messages

In MR11 - u201CNo (suitable) purchase order/item found     u201C.

Hi Friends,
We are having issue with MR11 in 4.6 B. While doing MR11 for a PO where Delivery costs have not been balanced, we are getting message u201CNo (suitable) purchase order/item found     u201C.
In the research, we found that in 4.6 B, MR11 is using program SAPMM08K, where as in ECC 6.00, it is using program SAPRCKM_MR11.
Initial fetch from PO history table :
4.6 B -> In 4.6 B we are using EKBI view (Join via EKKO / EKPO / EKBE for MR11) to fetch the PO history table. (It is not considering EKBZ table for delivery cost records)
Program is checking the Quantity of EKBI, if there is no difference in quantity then it is coming out of loop and showing message
No (suitable) purchase order/item found
    Message no. M8 401
3CAUSE&
    No purchase order exists which corresponds to your entry for a quantity
    difference posting.
ECC 6 -> In ECC 6.00 we are using view V_CKMLGRIR (DB View: Selection for MR11 Clearing GR/IR Clearing Account Table u2013 EKKO, EKPO and EKBE)
Here also program is checking the Quantity in the View, if there is no difference in quantity then it is going for another fetch (which is missing in 4.6 B).
In the another fetch, it is checking View V_CKMLGRIR_FR (DB View: Selection for MR11 Clearing Freight Clearing Accnt Table u2013 EKKO, EKPO and EKBZ)
I've searched sap notes but couldn't find much help. I've tried different search criteria but no luck. Could anyone able to help me?
Thanks,
Ramesh S

HI
MR11 will show only the blocked invoices due to quantity/price difference.
First of all please check your invoice (MIRO of your required PO) that it is blocked for invoice verification or not .(Please note block for payment is not relevant for MR11).
Further please check if you have mainatined any tolerance in GRN (MIGO) for under or over delivery , so it is not escaping the PO due to under/over tolerance limit.
Cheers
Mukta

Purchase Order Items open vs ME2M discrepancy

First posting so if this is not the right section please move this topic. Was the closest I could come to correct forum placement.
Hello all, I am in the process of setting up BPM to monitor u201CN* of Purchase Order Items openu201D from various plant locations and I am noticing the number BPM gives is different than what the system you give if I used ME2M.
For example: I am setting up BPM to monitor Number of Purchase Order Items Open for plant location 2102. The set up is scarce and I only have a few fields filled out in the set-up:
-Document Type u2013 Single Value u2013 NB, UB, FO, ZPC, ZGR
-Plant (Item) u2013 2102
-Doc. Category u2013 F (Purchase Order)
-All of fields are left blank
When this runs I will get an example of 1487 (it changes on an hourly basis so I canu2019t give a static value).
When I try to verify this number using ME2M I get a value of 1237. A difference of 250.
The configuration I am using for ME2M is as follows:
-Plant u2013 2102
-Scope of List u2013 ALLES
-Selection Parameters u2013 WE101
-Document Type - NB, UB, FO, ZPC, ZGR
-All other fields at left blank
Any reason for this discrepancy? The closest I can guess is SAP is pulling in some additional information OR my configuration is incorrect. Anybody run into this issue that has some tips?
Thank you
-nic

I know that ME2M has nothing to due to with BPM.
I am confused as to why when I set up BPM, in Solution Manager, to monitor Purchase Orders that are open I am getting a different number than when I use the transaction ME2M in SAP ECC.
For example:
When the process runs in Solution Manager I get back 1425 open POs
When I go into SAP ECC and use the transaction ME2M it will only pull up 1175 open POs
Somewhere along the lines I am missing or adding 250 POs. The current setup (listed above; not sure if BPM is configured the same for everyone) is listed above.
I have tried various set-up options in both BPM Solution Manager and SAP ECC (ME2M) but can't seem to find where these additional numbers are coming from.
Thank you
-nic

Sales order items refers to different purchase order items

Hello SAP Experts,
I have a requirement where sales order items are referring to different purchase order items. For eg. Item 1 from SO exist in PO no. 11 where as item 2 from SO exist in PO 12. Transaction MIRO allows to post items belonging to different purchase orders, but we have to do invoice verification using IDOCs. In EDI process, it is taking PO number from the SO header and not from the SO items.
Can anyone suggest how to get PO number from the SO item and not from the SO header.
Thanks.

Not possible to create sales order with reference to PO.
but if to capture cost, you can consider adding cost to customer's invoice.
e.g.
SO -> PO -Inb/IR -> GR -> OB -> Inv(Add here)
to add in that invoice, its either manual or through automatic condition.

No (suitable) item found for purchase order

Dear All,
The order is stock transfer order (STO) item category U. i saw GR is already create. GI and also DCGR. i want to do DCIR which is invoice receipt in tcode mr01, the error "No (suitable) item found for purchase order" is coming out. What would be the cause of this situation? i check with old last PO it is same set with the one that having in problem. i also double click the item to see the detail and what i can see tick option for del completed and no tick on final del.
no GR-based-4 or invoice receipt option to tick. means no tick option for this. but when i see previous po also same. but there is history on DCIR.
Really need to know what should i do? is bug?
Regards
Aishah

In case of out company it was SA(schudule agrement) PO we try on the Credit memo by MIRO t-code through IV
but we met the same error message
The problem cause of not exist delivery schedule quantiry we have put in the qty to there by manually after than this issue cleared.
Hoil.

MR11- Purchase order items not balanced. Material price will be negative

Hi all,
Currently i have PO with stock items with document date on Aug with qty of 5 and good receipt with qty of 5 on the same month as well. After that when it performs MR11- account maintenance i encounter the error above.
It has performed good issue to production and now left 5 qty.
Initially i thought because the stock value cannot absorb the material price, but i have done the same simulation on QAS. it seem to working fine.
Can you assist me on this.

Hi Jurgen,
Actually i have found the Snote related to this issue. It has solved the issue for me.
To clear the purchase order items, proceed as follows:
1. Execute transaction MR11 "Maintain GR/IR Clearing Account" with the
relevant selection parameters. Select all proposed account maintenance
document items whose cumulated difference value of a material is less
than the current stock value (SALK3) of the same material.
Post this account maintenance document.
2. Execute transaction MR11 "Maintain GR/IR Clearing Account" with the
above selection parameters again. Select a proposed account
maintenance document item whose difference value is greater than the
current stock value (SALK3) of the same material. Post this
account maintenance document. Post the portion of the current stock
value to the stock account (BSX). The rest is distributed to the price
difference account (PRD). Now the current stock value (SALK3) of the
material is 0.
3. Execute transaction MR11 "Maintain GR/IR Clearing Account" with the
above selection parameters again. Now you can post all remaining
proposed account maintenance document items for this material.
Note 1305016 corrects the symptom described.
SNote 1305016 - MR11_Negative stock value for value-only article II
SNote 983769 - MR11_CKMLGRIR 023 for GR-based IV & matl moving avg. price
Thank again for your assistant.

Sp_Transaction Notification For Purchase Order Item Checking

Hello All,
I need to create a sp_Transaction notification for Purchase Order where system will check that the document to be added
with Vendor 'A' and ItemCode 'ERT' should not be be previously added for the same vendor 'A.
Example:-
Doc No. Vendor   Item Code
1                A            ERT
Is added
Next if the Purchase Order is added with same vendor and same Item then system should block the entry and throw a message
'Purchase Order Already Entered for Vendor 'A' with Item Code 'ERT'"
This checking will be done for each line item of currently entered Purchase Order Document.
Thanks ,
Amit

Hi Amit,
i found this on forum. Try this,
if @object_type = N'22' and @transaction_type in (N'A', N'U')
begin
declare @line1 int
declare @lin1 int
declare @out1 int
Set @out1 = 0
SET @lin1 = 0
Declare @Vend as varchar(200)
Declare @ItemCode as varchar(200)
Select @Vend = CardCode From OPOR Where DocEntry = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del
Select @line1 = Max (LineNum)FROM POR1 WHERE POR1.DocEntry = @list_of_cols_val_tab_del
While @lin1 < @line1
Begin
     Select @ItemCode=ItemCode From POR1 Where DocEntry=@list_of_cols_val_tab_del and LineNum = @lin1
      if (SELECT COUNT(T0.DocEntry) FROM POR1 T0 inner join OPOR T1 on T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry
      WHERE T0.ItemCode = @ItemCode and T1.CardCode = @Vend)> 1
      Begin
           Set @Out1 = 1
           Break;
      END
           Else
           Begin
           Set @lin1 = @lin1+1
           Continue
      END
END
Set @lin1 = @lin1 + 1
if @out1 = 1
begin
      Set @error = 1
      Set @error_message = 'Item Code in line ' + CONVERT(nvarchar(4), @lin1) + N'already Exists For This Vendor!'
End
END
Check this too Stored procedure in purchase order for duplicate item for a vendor
Thanks,
Joseph
Edited by: Joseph Antony on Jan 11, 2011 1:37 PM

No active purchase order item for shipment cost

Hi,
When I'm entering a shipment cost document for a shipment using Vi01, I'm getting an information like "No active purchase order item for shipment cost", When I check in the service procurement tab there is no purchasing document and entry sheet found.
Please let me know what is causing the problem and what needs to be done to resolve this
Regards,
Ashwin

Hi,
Does your shipment document contains any stage?This problem might be because of this reason.
Regards,
Sumit

Standard program for unbilled sales orders and purchase order items

Can anyone advice, is there any standard program which gives the unbilled sales order and purchase order items.

Hi,
Use the T.Code VA05/VA05n for list of all the sales order s which are open.
Take T.Code:VA05N
Select the option "Open Sales Orders".
Execute.
It will give you all the orders which are open.
The standard program for this is:"SD_SALES_ORDERS_VIEW".
The same you can also get by using the T.Code VF04.
In this if your scenario is "Order related",then select the option "Order related".
Else if it is "Delivery related",then select "Delivery-related".
Execute.
The standatd program for this is:"SDBILLDL".
T.Code:VF05/VF05n is for list of billing documents.
Regards,
Krishna.
Note:Pls search the forum.

No Suitable Items found for PO (error M8035) while doing MIRO against service PO for the 1st time in the Company Code

Hi
I am encountering the error M8035 (" No Suitable Items found for PO ") while I am doing MIRO for the 1st time against service POs (item cat - D) in a company code.
in OMSY the period opened for the company code is : Current 06 2014 previous 05 2014
This was done because Go Live date for the new company code is 01.06.2014.
I am doing test in the test client now.
I have created a vendor on today's date
I have created a service PO on today's date (GR, GR Bsd IV, IR, Serv Bsd IV - these indicators are marked in the PO)
I have created service entry sheet on today's date (acc assignment - K, G/L a/c was determined from the Material Group maintained in the PO)
I have accepted the service entry sheet on 04.05.2014 (FI doc posted against the matl doc - KBS to WRX on 04.05.2014)
I am trying to do the MIRO in the same company code on 04.05.2014.
While I am putting the PO and its line item in MIRO item and pressing enter system shows the above info msg and nothings is appearing in MIRO item.
I have tried to do MIRO against service entry sheet also - same things happened.
I have tried selecting Goods Service Item+planned del cost in MIRO - nothing changed.
I have tried posting MIRO against a non service PO (acc assgnment K, Item cat - BLANK) after doing MIGO in the same company code in the same date- PO is appearing in that case.
FI people are able to post FB60 manually for the vendor I am using in the PO - so there is no problem in the vendor also.
I have gone through the scn post related with the topic, unfortunately none of them solved my problem.
Please help
Thanks
Sanjib...

Can you post a screen shot for PO history ?
Regards
Dev

User exit/BADI for updating Purchase Order Item

I am would like to update the purchase order item - specifically field EKPO-REPOS in a user exit or BADI. I haven't been able to find one that allows you to update the purchase order item.
Any input would be appreciated.
Derick

You can use BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST for you requirement
Method PROCESS_ITEM
* Retrieve item data.
    CALL METHOD im_item->get_data
      RECEIVING
        re_data = v_data_item.
Do you validations and changes here
*update changes
CALL METHOD im_item->set_data( v_data_item ).

Expand Table Control with Fields for Purchase Order Item Overview

Hi Gurus.
Hereu2019s something easy for you, I hope/ think. We just want to additionally show the field u201CMFRPNu201D in the purchase order item overview. See structure MEPO1211 for the table control.
How can we do this? Is it possible without a modification? Is there anything to pay attention to?
Lot's of questions, because we donu2019t find any complete solutions yet. It seems there are no official SAP suggestions for this issue.
Thanks in advance!
Regards
Patric

Is there no one out there who can answer my question?

MCEKPO-MENGE issue through 2LIS_02_ITM for Statistical Purchase Order Items

Hello Everyone,
I have come across this strange scenario where a given Purchase Order Item in the Source system - SAP R/3 has been changed in the following sequence,
1. First the PO Item was marked as a Deleted PO - LOEKZ = L which set the STAPO = X (Statistical) and
2. The Deletion Indicator was removed for the PO Item which means LOEKZ now is not having "L" and the STAPO also has been removed.
Due to the above scenario, now the Order Quantity in the SAP BW system has 0 as the value whereas the Quantity in the SAP R/3 System shows up as 1.
I was curious to know if there are any OSS Notes or processes in place to avoid this from happening. As I searched the forum and service place for the OSS notes related to this issue and could not find anything related.
The Order Quantity in our system is extracted from 2LIS_02_ITM (MCEKPO-MENGE) field.
Thanks in advance for the help.
Dharma.

hi Dharma..
Did you find a solution for this post?
I Have similar issue....
    I Have an issue (I think is issue)...with extractor 2LIS_02_ITM about reversal or deleted indicator.
Some PO are created on R/3 and mark for deleted some line items I try or I hope received a R indicator. But I didn´t receive the indicator..
     I only receive X on this field.. (delete indicator). or in other examples blank on this field
    Whats the difference between X , R and blank indicator?... when is posible receive X, R or blank value??
    I was thinking that when on R/3 some lines of PO orders were deleted.. I receive "R" indicator when I extract to BW (on the PSA)... but I didn't...
   If you know how work this kind of cases or examples, please explain me more.. or let me know where can I find more information please.
    I will assign points to all the answer.
   Thank you
Alice

QC51:No certificate is required for the purchase order item

Dear all.
I want to create an certificate Receipt In the T-CODE QC51.After input the purchase order and item and press return,the SAP show an error message:
No certificate is required for the purchase order item.
Message no. QC508
My question was where to control the purchase order item to require certificate or not?
Regard
Yoda

Hi
For this you have to maintain Certificate req in Material master.
MM01>Enter your material->Quality view-->Tick on QM procurement->Certificate require-Mension kind of certificate req.
like
E21     Cert. of conformity "2.1" EN 10204
E22     Test certif. "2.2"         EN 10204
E23     Works test certif. "2.3"   EN 10204
E31A     Insp. certificate "3.1.A" EN 10204
E31B     Insp. certificate "3.1.B" EN 10204
E31C     Insp. certificate "3.1.C" EN 10204
E32     Inspection report "3.2"    EN 10204
Q001     Conformance Report
Q002     Plating Certificate
Q003     Test Report
Q004     Certificate through Web
Q005     Chemical / Physical Test report + QC
etc.....
Customizing for this can be done in
SPRO->Quality Management->QM in Logistics--->Define Keys for Certificate Processing.
This will ask you during MIGO or during UD/confirmation possible thro' QC21
Regards
Sujit S Gujar

Sp Transaction Procedure For Purchase Order Item Checking

Hello All,
I need to create a sp_Transaction notification for Purchase Order where system will check that the document to be added
with Vendor 'A' and ItemCode 'ERT' should not be be previously added for the same vendor 'A.
Example:-
Doc No. Vendor Item Code
1 A ERT
Is added
Next if the Purchase Order is added with same vendor and same Item then system should block the entry and throw a message
'Purchase Order Already Entered for Vendor 'A' with Item Code 'ERT'"
This checking will be done for each line item of currently entered Purchase Order Document.
Thanks ,
Amit

Hello Amit,
You don't need post identical thread twice. This SP related discussion is usually posted on main forum.
Please close this one.
Thanks,
Gordon

No (suitable) purchase order/item found for MR11

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for