No suitable settlement rule found for object

Dear all,
i have a production order which initially does not have the settlement rule and this causes it to appear in my WIP report even though it has been closed. I tried inserting the settlement rule in the production order, calculating the variance and posting of the settlement but an error msg of
"No suitable settlement rule found for object......" appears while doing the variance calculation. Any suggestions on how can i resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance 1st.
Regards
YM

Hi,
check what the setting for KV206 is in the user defined messages (TA OPR4_KKS1). If it is set to ' E ' try setting it to ' * '.
Regards
Karl

Similar Messages

Error CREDIT_SEGMENTS_ADD COIOB NOT FOUND FOR object CC...

Hi All,
My user is geting the ERROR while running the actual OH calculation through CJ45 as below:
Error CREDIT_SEGMENTS_ADD COIOB NOT FOUND FOR object
Message NO k5011.
As this is more ralaing to the costing sheet, this refers to controlling module.
We have verfied the Note 515426, but the correction were delivered in 4.7 itself. My client is using the 6.0 verion.
Can anybody suggest the reason for the above error.
Thanks & Regards
Shankar

HI,
whats the message class, message number?
BR Christian

No archive information found for object type and document type

Hi All,
When i try to view the print preview for a perticular doc type, system is giving the error as "No archive information found for object type and document type"
Diagnosis
    No information was found about optical archiving. This may be due to
    either of the following reasons:
    1. No valid archiving parameters were passed
    2. Your system is not configured for optical archiving
System Response
    Processing is cancelled.
Procedure
    Specify valid archiving parameters or check whether your system is configured for optical archiving
Regds,
CB

Hello,
You are trying to Print & also archive by selecting the option Print & Archive.
You have to do archivelink configurations and then create document type and assign to the object type with content repository with archivelink table.
If you want to archive the spool or output then you have to use object type as DRAW. If you are archiving invoice document or letters or so on then you have to know the object type/Business object of the transaction.
Please note that for archivelink configuration, attachment will be either stored in archive server or in SAP database table based on business requirement.
Hope this will give you some understanding on archiving area.
-Thanks,
Ajay

Funds mngt - Number range 01 not found for object BULI_DOCNR

Hi all
need some urgent help to crack an error am getting while creating a budget in funds management.
the error am getting is
"Number range 01 not found for object BULI_DOCNR in fiscal year 2007"
I have maintained the number range in
Public Sector Management-Budgetary control system-Budgeting-Budget Entry Documents-Maintain Number Range Interval for Entry Documents.
But am still getting the error....
will really appreciate some help on this
thanks in advance

The number range object refers to "FM budgeting line item number "
Are you using Former budgeting or BCS ?
Try t-code- ok11 and ok91 under former budgeting.
Thanks
Siva

WBS Settlement rule control for service orders

Hello,
We have an requirement to implement validation point for service order settlement rule. Currently there is no validation check of settlment rule for service order. So that the settlement is happend to incorrect receivers in service orders.
For example :
Service order created for company code - 400 and the settlement rule receiver should be WBS which is belongs to same company code but some case , user are maintained wrong WBS in settlement rule which belongs to some other company code.
Can you please hlep us on this requirement and suggest any enhencement point avalible on the same.
Thanks
Risha

Hi,
Please go to okg2,
Calculate wip or result analysis
remove the tick for Order In Engineer to Order Production
Now run result analysis and check whether settlement will not happen for cross company code.
please check this and revert back.
Thanking you
Vengaiah Chowdary

Making Settlement rule mandatory for creating any WBS element

Hello All,
We have an requirement that system should not allow us to save any WBS element until the settlement rule is maintained.
This we want only for WBS elements where Investment rule is not assigned.
Can alyone help me to find out if this is possible, if yes then how.
Points Assured.
Thanks & Regards,
Jatinder Bansal

Hi,
The only way it seems possible is using exists in validations.
if not try to check the status of the wbs element in a validation. function module is STATUS_CHECK. and i think the system might set a special status, if a settlement rule has been maintained for a wbs element.
Rgds
Sudhir Reddy

Settlement rule Mandatory for Plant Maintenance order

Hi Expert!
I want to make the option Settlement rule mandatory while creating plant maintenance order. I would really appreciate if you provide me the menu path in customisation to make this mandatory.
Thanks
J

Hi Jean
I do not think you can make it mandatory while creation itself.
But, you can make it mandatory (Check Functions for setting order types->settlement rule....) for order release.
Best regards
Ramki

Number range interval not found for object ISH_NLEI in executing NP38

Dear ALL,
In executing Transaction NP38 when we save the surgical procedure codes the system
generates an error message "number range interval not found " . The object referred here
ISH_NLEI number range has already been defined in spro Define technical number range.
Please assist what should be done here to resolve the problem.
Regards
Ramit

Hi, check if it maintained in tcode snro for this object

Transport Error while moving Transfer rules - RS_ISMP_AFTER_IMPORT for object type(s) ISMP ( )

Hello Experts
Strucked up with an issue while transporting the Transfer rules that are created for an UPFILE source system.
Transport is included with list of Data source Replica, Transfer rules, Transfer structure and Info Package.
My data Source : ZVPRCRDT for an UPFILE
Below is my error screen :
Tried to resolve the error by moving the Data source Replica as an individual Transport.
Still see the same error and my data source is active in the current system.
Looking for a resolution to find out the root cause.
Any help is appreciated...

Thanks for your response Ram.
My Source System UPFILE is in active mode.
Unsure why system is throwing error as source system assignement was inconsistency.
All fields are mapped perfect with one-one relation.
Worked by reassigning the UPFILE - source system to the data source but still i m seeing the same error : Data Source doesnt exist in source system of version A.
Transported the DS alone to Quality initially where i m unable to find the transported data source in my quality(target). DO i need to perform replicate meta data ...something like that in quality so that imported data sources will get refreshed?
If so can you let me know the approach.
Thanks

Settlement Rule for Internal Order

Hi All
I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
CAT - FXA
Settlement Receiver - Asset
% - 100
Settlement type - Full
Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
Message no. KD042
Diagnosis
You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.

Hi:
        Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
"Symptom
    1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
    2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
Additional key words
KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
Cause and prerequisites
    1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
    You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
    The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
    2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
Solution
    1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
    2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
    Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
Regards

PM:Action log for Settlement rule

Dear all,
May i know are there any way that i can see the changes that being done at screen maintain settlement rule. For example if I change the settlement type, system will keep the change/action log for that changes.
One more question, what the different between settlement type 'FUL' and 'PER' (impact to the settlement)
thank you so much,
Siti Norbaida

Hi,
I Hope this Documentation will help you ........
Settlement type
Depending on the processing type, the settlement type determines which settlement rule is used in a particular type of settlement processing.
The SAP system supports four settlement types. The AUC and PRE settlement types are used for settlement of capital investment measures. You can only use the PER settlement type for planned settlement.
PER (periodic settlement):
Settlement with this settlement type covers only the costs for the relevant settlement period.
The following data from internal cost allocations:
Sender cost center/activity type sent
Business process
Quantities
is allocated further to the following receivers:
Cost center
Internal order
Sales order
WBS element
Cost object
Business process
Actual activity prices, elimination of internal business volume and variances can then be calculated correctly in Cost Center Accounting and Activity-Based Accounting;
FUL (full settlement):
You can use this settlement type in automatic settlements.
The difference to periodic settlement is that in full settlement you settle each time all the costs that have occurred for a sender object for all the periods prior to the settlement (and are not yet settled). If PER rules exist, they take precedence over the FUL rule.
Quantities from internal activity allocations are not sent to the receiver. This means that there is no guarantee that actual activity prices, elimination of internal business volume, and variance calculation will take place correctly. For this reason, we do not recommend that you use FUL for cost centers or business processes.
AuC (Capitalization in asset under construction):
This settlement is automatically generated if you enter a capital investment profile with an AuC as its capital investment measure in the order control data.
Settlement is conducted periodically and in full to the AuC
PRE (periodic preliminary settlement):
You can enter PRE rules in the settlement rule for the order. They are used as part of settling capital investment measures. Depending on the rules you entered, posted debits are settled to the CO receivers or to a G/L account before the periodic settlement.
It is good idea to do this for particular line items if there are additional costs assigned to a capital investment measure that should not be capitalized. This may be necessary, should you wish to monitor the total costs of the measure in controlling.
Use
Note that settlement type FUL permits quantity settlement for primary cost elements only. You cannot settle quantities to assets.
Note that you cannot manually create or change a distribution rule with settlement type AUC. This has the following effect on settlement rule maintenance:
The required rule is generated from the asset under construction, which is stored in the master data for a capital investment measure, ( order or WBS element)when you carry out settlement for the first time.
Regards,
Gangadhar

Unable to assign AUC as settlement type in settlement rule for FXA category

Dear Experts,
One of my requirement is that one WBS has several actual posting for AUC of different types and settle through CJ88. Investment profile is not in scope.
To run the above scenario, i created AUC manually via AS01 of different types. When i create settlement rule manually for that WBS i can't see the settlement type "AUC" for FXA category. I can see only the settlement type of "PER and FULL". 100% settlement should be done for all AUC posted for that WBS at the time of each period closing.
Could you help me to resolve this issue asap?
Regards
Vetri

Hi,
To get AUC in settlement rule , you need to allow settlement at wbs level which use to be controlled in settlement profile. Also you wont find AUC but u will find fixed asset- FXA.
One more thing settlement rule come automatically when you run the settlement first time as captilisation. You will get the settlement rule automatically.
Regards
Abhishek Sinha

How to create distribution rules group for wbs settlement rules

Hi,
How can I create distribution rules group for WBS element settlement rules ?
For some WBS elements I can see(in view mode(cj03)) distribution groups in settlement rules screen but when I try to edit settlement rules I only see default group.
How can i create/edit those groups ?
Regards,
Rafał

Self answered:
CJIC t-code

Error during automatic settlement rule creation

Hi Gurus,
For the investment project, I maintained as follows, first level WBSE - Only planning element - no settlement. 2nd level WBSE - settled to AuCs. For level three & below settled to Superior WBSE. I had created the Settlement type with '5'. When I am executing CJB2 to create the Settlement rules automatically, I am getting the following error message for level 3 & below WBSE.
Enter a valid value for the settlement type :
Message no. KD199
Diagnosis
The system found a settlement type settlement type in the settlement rule which either does not exist or is unsuitable for the sender.
Procedure
If possible, enter a suitable settlement rule. Remember that the rules for preliminary settlement ("PRE") of capital investment measures are different from those for period settlement ("PER") of other settlement senders. Periodic settlement only makes sense for capital investment measures. They must not have any "PER" rules.
To enter an investment profile (in the control data for an order or WBS element) or to remove it. However, first delete the PER or PRE rules (in the settlement rule) and er zu in internal orders, you can first change the investment profile and then adapt the rules before you save.
Error(s) during creation of settlement rule :
Message no. ORB509
Diagnosis
Errors occurred during the check on settlement receivers.
System Response
Processing stopped.
Procedure
Check whether the:
Specific receiver Account assignment e actually exists
Settlement profile Z7 permits account assignment to the specified receiver
can anyone help me where I am making mistake or what is the procedure to be adopted for such scenario.
somebody else also had discussed the same issue in this forum but there is no answer for this.
thanks in advance
Vinodh

hi Sreenivas,
Thanks for your reply,
I tried this, system is giving the following error now
Could not find a superior WBS element for WBS element
Message no. CJ115
Diagnosis
The system could not find a superior element for a WBS element while it was executing the function 'Derive structure'
System Response
Processing stopped.
What could be the reason ?
thanks in advance,
Vinodh

Settlement rule error

Hi,
I am facing as issue while settling costs to internal order. The system is giving warning message "Enter a percentage, equivalence number, or amount"
Diagnosis
You have entered at least one distribution rule which contains neither a percentage nor an equivalence number nor an amount.
Procedure
For each distribution rule, you must enter either a percentage, an equivalence number or an amount.
Alternatively, and depending on the situation and how you want the system to behave, one of the following is possible or required:
You want to enter the percentage, equivalence number or amount later.
You can ignore this warning. However, you should check that the appropriate values are entered before settlement.
You want to enter a percentage, an equivalence number, or an amount. However, the relevant field will not accept input, or is not displayed.
Go to the settlement profile you are using and check that one of "Percentage settlement", "Equivalence numbers", or "Amount settlement" has been switched on. You can find out which settlement profile you are using from the "Parameters" section of the screen in settlement rule maintenance.
(Press F5 to proceed to customizing.)
You receive this message other than in settlement rule maintenance - for example, when saving an order or a WBS element.
Go to settlement rule maintenance and check the individual distribution rules.
This error is coming only from past one week. Any pointers towards the resolution/ or the reasons for the error will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
S.Sumana

Hi,
On further analysis, we found that there was a settlement (in KO03) that took place without specifying percentage or equivalence amount. Is there anything that can be done like reverting the settlement so that this message doesnot appear.
Regards,
S.Sumana

No suitable settlement rule found for object

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for