Nodemgr process consuming memory

All,
We have a problem we've been experiencing for some time where the nodemgr
process starts consuming over 2gig of memory - at the OS level and locking up
our server at times. This happened on Solaris 2.6
with various older versions of Forte and we were told that upgrading to
version 3J1 would resolve it.
Unfortunately, it hasn't resolved the problem. It has happened again to an
application written in 3J1 on Unix Sun Solaris 2.6.
Forte is saying that no other company has experienced this problem with 3J1 on
Solaris 2.6. Please let me know if you have so I can relate this to Forte.
Thanks,
Peggy Adrian
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, Peggy Lynn Adrian wrote:
Unfortunately, it hasn't resolved the problem. It has happened again to an
application written in 3J1 on Unix Sun Solaris 2.6.We have experienced it too, with the previous releases man times.
With J1 I don't remember it happened ...
But, my 2cents : to save the OS , set a user limit of virtual memory
usage:
I use bash, I set it with ulimit -v 256000 to 256MB.
Interestingly when Forte crashes, it uses almost that amount of memory,
and one processor (we have a dual machine). And not more (that's why the
system can't kill it :) )
By the way, we have experienced some ftexec failures (memory and CPU
consumption) with J1 too, but since they were not reproducable, we did not
reported them. My tip : there may be a problem around the garbage
collection routine (that is just a tip from the outside). It seem to
happen when something made lots of objects, and consumed lots of memory.
GA'BRIEL, A'kos ([email protected]) FAX: (+36-1) 4312-977
UNIX & Internet consultant Phone: (+36-1) 4312-979
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Similar Messages

  • Nodemgr process running away with memory

    We have 3 different applications that this has happened to. All of a
    sudden, the nodemgr for the application environment will start consuming
    memory on the Unix Solars 2.6 box. The nodemgr process gets up to
    2 gig of virtual memory usage and seems to 'die', not to mention sometimes
    consuming all the available memory on the box, locking up the box and
    requiring a box reboot. I'm getting paged when a process starts consuming
    memory so at least a box reboot has been avoided lately.
    One application is using 3G2, two 3f2 and one is a web sdk application.
    I suspect that there is a bug in Forte causing this to happen. Maybe a
    bug with the way Forte is not handling something from the version of Solaris
    we're using.
    I've been working with a Forte tech rep. and they have said they haven't
    seen any customers with the problem and don't have a reason for it.
    Has anyone else seen this happen and can you please shed some light
    on it?
    Thanks,
    Peggy Adrian
    [email protected]
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

    Peggy:
    I have DEFINITELY seen this problem and strongly believe that it is related to
    3G2 running on Solaris 2.6. As you know, 3G2 is not supported on Solaris 2.6.
    We upgraded to 3J1 and Solaris 2.6 in late November, and have never seen this
    problem since. However, we did see this problem a number of times when trying
    to run 3G2 on Solaris 2.6.
    By the way, we did find that if we killed the nodemgr and then restarted it
    VERY quickly, it would rebind properly and all would be well (except for
    having to start all the router partitions again.)
    -Martin
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

  • Process consuming huge memory space

    Hi
    please let me know how to find the process consuming huge memory space
    Regrads,
    Pradeee

    Hi,
    Thanks for the reply
    when i gave the query i got the following
    SQL> select s.sid, s.serial#, p.pid, p.spid, pga_alloc_mem from v$process p, v$session s where pga_alloc_mem > 1024*1024 and p.addr = s.paddr;
    SID SERIAL# PID SPID PGA_ALLOC_MEM
    556 268 58 3730 1712865
    559 1006 184 4363 2920969
    560 75 182 4353 2368225
    561 3212 189 4405 1909473
    563 3304 161 4298 1741321
    564 263 188 4402 3416801
    565 1711 172 4322 1741321
    566 16294 24 23504 1516257
    567 2634 168 4316 1741321
    568 6035 173 4324 1741321
    570 6717 218 17241 1975009
    SID SERIAL# PID SPID PGA_ALLOC_MEM
    572 8408 185 4393 3678945
    576 8063 166 4311 1741321
    578 26282 177 4332 1741321
    579 5158 162 4305 1479177
    580 2755 165 12852 3117577
    581 4671 175 4328 1741321
    588 3125 176 4330 1741321
    589 28 96 3859 1479177
    591 38 57 3699 2564833
    592 4343 53 3622 1712865
    593 33 18 3137 9625693
    SID SERIAL# PID SPID PGA_ALLOC_MEM
    595 71 72 3803 1712865
    596 6544 44 29811 1085961
    597 17149 180 4338 1479177
    599 551 208 5055 3744481
    600 1064 181 4340 1741321
    601 12 77 3819 1712865
    602 36 74 3807 1712865
    605 11 75 3813 1712865
    606 5045 207 13554 7742177
    607 27464 67 29845 1479177
    609 20 79 3825 1712865
    SID SERIAL# PID SPID PGA_ALLOC_MEM
    612 21 23 3150 7217889
    613 11943 21 29907 1085961
    614 8 116 3910 2527753
    615 38 100 3873 1479177
    616 31 110 3897 2368225
    617 28 109 3902 1778401
    618 18 107 3879 1479177
    619 11 105 3893 1479177
    620 6 104 3881 1741321
    621 13 52 3618 1712865
    622 21 43 3509 5776097
    SID SERIAL# PID SPID PGA_ALLOC_MEM
    623 9 111 3899 2368225
    624 34 112 3908 1675785
    625 10 114 3889 2003465
    626 1788 169 23978 1778401
    627 1070 179 4336 1741321
    629 12 117 3914 2368225
    630 17 120 3947 2527753
    631 5 119 3924 1581793
    632 57 63 9360 1581793
    634 41 45 9550 2106081
    635 3682 140 4251 2490368
    SID SERIAL# PID SPID PGA_ALLOC_MEM
    636 18158 204 4691 9315041
    638 36 99 3863 1479177
    639 11 98 3861 1479177
    640 2993 27 3195 1479177
    644 10536 186 4396 1581793
    645 32 113 3912 2368225
    646 10 130 4196 1872393
    647 17273 187 4399 2106081
    650 164 125 4142 2302689
    651 90 128 4165 1741321
    652 116 118 3922 2368225
    SID SERIAL# PID SPID PGA_ALLOC_MEM
    654 75 121 3993 2527753
    655 7241 39 29659 1085961
    658 6501 49 28948 1741321
    659 1127 81 15939 2134537
    663 764 131 13807 5693533
    664 13 16 3135 1479177
    665 13304 46 29591 1085961
    667 187 78 3857 1479177
    668 208 68 21528 1385185
    669 10483 64 29791 2003465
    670 574 47 3605 2314117
    SID SERIAL# PID SPID PGA_ALLOC_MEM
    671 5417 167 4314 1741321
    672 276 65 3736 2695905
    673 48 136 4241 2433761
    675 13168 25 29786 1085961
    678 1907 59 29843 1823925
    679 172 42 3507 11281121
    680 40 134 4234 1516257
    681 73 103 3875 1479177
    682 492 108 3887 1479177
    683 266 51 3616 1712865
    684 38 127 4189 2433761
    SID SERIAL# PID SPID PGA_ALLOC_MEM
    685 485 54 3620 1712865
    686 18763 170 4318 1741321
    687 782 92 5656 5186273
    688 221 129 4206 1675785
    689 13003 19 29560 1151497
    690 346 73 3815 1712865
    692 210 102 3883 2564833
    693 180 76 3817 1712865
    694 84 147 4268 1741321
    695 7 115 3891 1581793
    696 741 95 11553 2200073
    SID SERIAL# PID SPID PGA_ALLOC_MEM
    697 32 122 4000 1450721
    698 31 138 4248 2368225
    699 9 148 4272 1741321
    700 39 126 4167 2724361
    701 17 36 3221 1712865
    702 44 123 3935 2368225
    704 5 22 3144 13574881
    705 62 20 3139 2433761
    709 33 151 4280 1581793
    710 13 143 4258 1479177
    711 23 82 3823 1712865
    SID SERIAL# PID SPID PGA_ALLOC_MEM
    715 45 55 3676 1712865
    718 14 97 3865 1479177
    719 27 50 3614 1778401
    720 113 132 4221 1479177
    721 30 133 4230 1450721
    724 77 56 3695 1712865
    725 26 139 4245 1975009
    726 31975 149 4274 1741321
    728 38 144 4261 2433761
    729 1426 191 4411 1479177
    730 17 40 3372 3678945
    SID SERIAL# PID SPID PGA_ALLOC_MEM
    732 19535 190 4408 2499297
    734 44 106 3885 2134537
    735 78 31 3210 1479177
    736 1471 28 29763 1085961
    737 11 37 3228 1479177
    738 25549 171 4320 1741321
    739 93 41 3505 9511649
    740 21 33 3214 3445257
    742 24320 32 3212 2003465
    745 1526 29 29915 1085961
    746 5782 62 29754 5328773
    SID SERIAL# PID SPID PGA_ALLOC_MEM
    749 53 26 3192 5972705
    751 3238 66 17384 7180809
    754 59 142 4255 2302689
    758 193 209 4826 6038241
    759 3097 83 29921 1675785
    763 2355 174 4326 1741321
    766 9446 178 4334 1741321
    769 16 152 4282 3810017
    770 70 150 4276 1741321
    772 7 153 4284 1741321
    774 19 158 4292 1741321
    here i changed the pga memory allocation to MB
    i want to know how to spool program or sql which is consuming memory space from the sid,pid as mentioned
    Regards,
    Pradeee

  • Clouds process consuming 100% of cpu

    Whenever MBP is not able to connect to internet, the cloudd process consumes 100% cpu.
    This is draining the battery in a very short time.
    Internet connectivity, either lack there of or because of corp. firewall rules send this process into 100% consumption.
    Only work around is to disable all items in iCloud control panel, which is painful for access and re-sync.
    Robert

    Does the it eventually recover on it's own? It's possible that the JVM is doing full garbage collection.  How big is your max heap size?  I suggest to add some garbage collection debugging in the JVM_OPTS to see if it is Java's garbage collection or not.  Might as well check the heap too, to see if it's running our of memory.
    Example;
    -verbose:gc -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps -XX:+PrintGCDetails -XX:+PrintTenuringDistribution -Xloggc:/tmp/gc.log -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError -XX:HeapDumpPath=/tmp
    Ron

  • Media Server Consuming Memory

    My project is forwarding an RTMP stream to an RTMFP (multicast stream) using a server action script. In forwarding this stream, the AMSCore process keeps consuming memory. This consumption of memory requires the system to be rebooted repeated. How can this be prevented?

    I did not think I could use the sample multicast application with my
    project's software. Instead,  I compared the outbound NetConnection and
    NetStream code in the sample application with the outbound NetConnection
    and NetStream code in my project's multicast server actionscript. One of
    differences I discovered is that my project's application connected to the
    rtmfp group with the following call:
    nc_connect..connect("rtmfp:");
    while the sample called:
    nc.connect(resetUriProtocol(streamContext.client.uri, "rtmfp"));
    Therefore, in my project's actionscript, I replaced connection to the
    "rtmfp:" serverless group with a connection to the application uri:
    net_connect.connect("rtmfp://127.0.0.1:" + port + "/" + application.name)
    This change fixed the excessive memory consumption. So, why does the
    connection to serverless network endpoint consume memory on Windows Server
    2008 R2 to the point that all of the virtual memory is used or it crashes
    the system?
    Scott F. Wilson
    Principal Software Engineer
    Raytheon SAS
    Marlborough, MA  01752
    Phone: 508-490-3123
    Fax:     508-490-1366

  • How can I use XSQLRequest for processing in-memory XMLDocument

    How can I use class XSQLRequest for processing in-memory XSQL?
    What should i pass in URL parameter value for constructor XSQLRequest(XMLDocument p0, URL p1)?
    Could you write the some examples?

    Here's one example of doing this:
    String xsqlPage = "<page connection='demo' xmlns:xsql='urn:oracle-xsql'>"+
                      "  <xsql:set-page-param name='username' value='{@u}'/>"+
                      "  <xsql:set-page-param name='password' value='{@p}'/>"+
                      "  <xsql:query bind-params='username password'>"+
                      "    select 'Authenticated' from dual"+
                      "    where 'SCOTT' = UPPER(?) /* username */"+
                      "      and 'TIGER' = UPPER(?) /* password */"+
                      "  </xsql:query>"+
                      "</page>";
      DOMParser d = new DOMParser();
      d.parse( new StringReader(xsqlPage));
      XSQLRequest req = new XSQLRequest(d.getDocument(),null);
      StringWriter sw = new StringWriter();
      PrintWriter errors = new PrintWriter(sw);
      Hashtable h = new Hashtable(2);
      h.put("u","scott");
      h.put("p","tiger");
      req.process(h,output,errors);
      output.println(sw.toString());

  • I have a printer that I don't use consuming memory.  How do I get rid of it?

    My laptop is increasingly slow. How do i get rid of the HP 1010 that I don't use, and otherwise speed it up? 
    EtreCheck version: 2.1.4 (107)
    Report generated 23 December, 2014 8:00:41 PM EST
    Click the [Support] links for help with non-Apple products.
    Click the [Details] links for more information about that line.
    Click the [Adware] links for help removing adware.
    Hardware Information: ℹ️
      MacBook Pro (13-inch, Early 2011) (Verified)
      MacBook Pro - model: MacBookPro8,1
      1 2.3 GHz Intel Core i5 CPU: 2-core
      4 GB RAM
      BANK 0/DIMM0
      2 GB DDR3 1333 MHz ok
      BANK 1/DIMM0
      2 GB DDR3 1333 MHz ok
      Bluetooth: Old - Handoff/Airdrop2 not supported
      Wireless:  en1: 802.11 a/b/g/n
    Video Information: ℹ️
      Intel HD Graphics 3000 - VRAM: 384 MB
      Color LCD 1280 x 800
    System Software: ℹ️
      Mac OS X 10.7.5 (11G63b) - Uptime: 2 days 19:48:24
    Disk Information: ℹ️
      ST9320325ASG disk0 : (320.07 GB)
      disk0s1 (disk0s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
      Macintosh HD (disk0s2) / : 319.21 GB (211.66 GB free)
      Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>  [Recovery]: 650 MB
      MATSHITADVD-R   UJ-8A8 
    USB Information: ℹ️
      Apple Inc. BRCM2070 Hub
      Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
      Apple Inc. Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad
      Apple Inc. FaceTime HD Camera (Built-in)
      Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
    Thunderbolt Information: ℹ️
      Apple, Inc. MacBook Pro
    Launch Daemons: ℹ️
      [loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist [Support]
      [loaded] com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper.plist [Support]
    User Launch Agents: ℹ️
      [loaded] com.adobe.ARM.[...].plist [Support]
      [loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist [Support]
    User Login Items: ℹ️
      iTunesHelper UNKNOWNHidden (missing value)
    Internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
      Flip4Mac WMV Plugin: Version: 2.4.0.11 [Support]
      FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 16.0.0.235 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
      QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.1
      AdobePDFViewerNPAPI: Version: 10.1.13 [Support]
      AdobePDFViewer: Version: 10.1.13 [Support]
      Flash Player: Version: 16.0.0.235 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
      SharePointBrowserPlugin: Version: 14.4.7 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
      GarminGpsControl: Version: 4.0.1.0 Release - SDK 10.6 [Support]
      Silverlight: Version: 4.0.60531.0 [Support]
      DirectorShockwave: Version: 12.0.2r122 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
      JavaAppletPlugin: Version: 14.9.0 - SDK 10.7 Check version
    User internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
      Google Earth Web Plug-in: Version: 7.1 [Support]
    3rd Party Preference Panes: ℹ️
      Flash Player  [Support]
      Flip4Mac WMV  [Support]
    Time Machine: ℹ️
      Time Machine not configured!
    Top Processes by CPU: ℹ️
          2% WindowServer
          2% PluginProcess
          1% WebProcess
          1% Mail
          0% opendirectoryd
    Top Processes by Memory: ℹ️
      932 MB HP_Deskjet_1010_series
      387 MB WebProcess
      249 MB PluginProcess
      245 MB Safari
      112 MB Mail
    Virtual Memory Information: ℹ️
      82 MB Free RAM
      2.18 GB Active RAM
      1.07 GB Inactive RAM
      962 MB Wired RAM
      1.73 GB Page-ins
      4.33 GB Page-outs
    Diagnostics Information: ℹ️
      Dec 21, 2014, 12:13:04 AM Self test - passed

    Apple Portables: Troubleshooting the slot load optical disc drive

  • Firefox does not open when clicking on the icon, the firefox.exe process consumes 99 % of the CPU and my computer runs slowly.

    I have been a happy user of Firefox for many years. Around last April first I opened Firefox and was offered an update to v 4.42.0.0 which I accepted. Installation seemingly went well. I forget now exactly what happened but the result has been that ever since April 1 I haven’t been able to open the Firefox browser when clicking on the Firefox icon. My computer now was running very slowly. I tried to uninstall Firefox, but a popup told me I couldn’t because Firefox was in use. This confused me because I couldn’t see it being used. Only now I have found that on Task Manager processes that “firefox.exe” was consuming 99 % of the CPU. After removing firefox.exe by clicking End Process my computer ran better. I uninstalled Firefox I had on my computer and installed Firefox 5.0. Unfortunately I have the same problems: Firefox does not open when clicking on the icon, the firefox.exe process consumes 99 % of the CPU and my computer runs slowly.

    Born2die! Brilliant. I am a desktop clicker and never knew Firefox had a safe mode.
    Thank You!
    I was unable to start in safe mode initially. The second time I disabled all of the Add-Ons and she started up just fine. I enabled them one by one hoping to track down the culprit but the problem seems to have gone away.
    BTW I am running ver. 3.6.8 (in response to cor-el's earlier post) and
    Firefox is in the process of downloading 3.6.10 (which I am starting to think may have been what caused this whole problem to begin with)
    Incidentally, whats up with all of the Java Console Add Ons?
    I have:
    Java Console 6.0.11, Java Console 6.0.13, Java Console 6.0.15
    Java Console 6.0.17, Java Console 6.0.20, and Java Console 6.0.21
    What are they? Do I need them? Can I uninstall them? Is this due to using Open Office?
    Also, .NET Framework 0.0.0 Should I uninstall it?

  • Process in memory after System.exit(0)

    I still see the process in memory after I exit the app. Do you think it is a JWS side effect?
    Platform: W2K
    Cheers,
    Ivan

    Ivan,
    when you enable the 'java console' in Java Web Start->Preferences->Advanced->Show Java Console, you'll notice that you run into a java.security.accessControlException.
    To avoid that, sign your jar file(s) and add the following to your jnlp file :
    <security>
    <all-permissions>
    </security>
    and it will work as expected!
    Regards,
    Patrick

  • Is there any command/query/etc, which would allow to understand what database objects (for example tables) are consuming memory and how much of it?

    TimesTen Release 11.2.1.9.6 (64 bit Linux/x86_64)
    Command> dssize;
    PERM_ALLOCATED_SIZE:      51200000
      PERM_IN_USE_SIZE: 45996153
    PERM_IN_USE_HIGH_WATER:   50033464
    TEMP_ALLOCATED_SIZE:      2457600
    TEMP_IN_USE_SIZE:         19680
    TEMP_IN_USE_HIGH_WATER:   26760
    Is there any command/query/etc, which would allow to understand what database objects (for example tables) are consuming memory and how much of it?
    tried to use ttsize function, but it gives some senseless results – for example, for the biggest table, tokens, it produces following output (that this table is 90GB in size – what physically cannot be true):
    Command> call ttsize('tokens',null,null);
    < 90885669274.0000 >
    1 row found.

    Are you able to use the command line version of ttSize instead? This splits out how much space is being used by indexes (in the Temp section of the TT memory segment), which I think is being combined into one, whole figure in the procedure version of ttSize you're using. For example:
    ttSize -tbl ia my_ttdb
    Rows = 4
    Total in-line row bytes = 17524
    Total = 17524
    Command> create index i1 on ia(a);
    ttSize -tbl ia my_ttdb;
    Rows = 4
    Total in-line row bytes = 17524
    Indexes:
    Range index JSPALMER.I1 adds 5618 bytes
      Total index bytes = 5618
    Total = 23142
    Command> call ttsize ('ia',,);
    < 23142.0000000000 >
    1 row found.
    In 11.2.2 we added the procedure ttComputeTabSizes which populates system tables with detailed table size data, and was designed to be an alternative to ttSize. Unfortunately it still doesn't calculate index usage though, and it isn't in 11.2.1.

  • Physical Oracle connections consume memory continuously

    I am running Oracle Database 10.2.0.1 on a Solaris x86-64bit system. We have recently stumbled upon an issue where the physical Oracle DB connections' footprint continues to grow over time. If you do a 'ps' you'll see:
    oracle 13074 1 0 Nov 27 ? 0:00 oracleAMS (LOCAL=NO)
    oracle 13076 1 1 Nov 27 ? 146:20 oracleAMS (LOCAL=NO)
    oracle 13459 1 1 Nov 27 ? 144:39 oracleAMS (LOCAL=NO)
    oracle 13463 1 1 Nov 27 ? 144:22 oracleAMS (LOCAL=NO)
    oracle 13457 1 0 Nov 27 ? 0:00 oracleAMS (LOCAL=NO)
    oracle 19847 1 0 Nov 11 ? 0:00 oracleAMS (LOCAL=NO)
    oracle 13088 1 1 Nov 27 ? 145:52 oracleAMS (LOCAL=NO)
    oracle 19925 1 0 Nov 11 ? 0:19 oracleAMS (LOCAL=NO)
    oracle 13461 1 1 Nov 27 ? 144:43 oracleAMS (LOCAL=NO)
    The connections that seem to be taking up the most memory also have a large value in the 'TIME' column of the output from 'ps'.
    Output from top:
    13463 oracle 11 49 0 2646M 2561M sleep 144:22 0.46% oracle
    13465 oracle 11 59 0 2646M 2561M sleep 144:35 0.27% oracle
    13461 oracle 11 59 0 2645M 2560M sleep 144:43 0.74% oracle
    13459 oracle 11 49 0 2645M 2560M sleep 144:40 0.59% oracle
    13088 oracle 11 59 0 2645M 2560M cpu/0 145:52 0.40% oracle
    13076 oracle 11 59 0 2645M 2560M sleep 146:20 0.28% oracle
    13090 oracle 11 59 0 2645M 2559M sleep 143:47 0.53% oracle
    Notice the size column that these connections are consuming ~2.5 GB of RAM each, but they start out around 800M.
    We've looked through our application code and have been unable to find any glaring coding issues (i.e. failure to close a PreparedStatement or ResultSet). Does anyone know if there is/was a bug in the version of Oracle we're using that would cause this to happen? Has anyone else seen this issue?
    Any feedback is greatly apprecaited!

    Generally, a ideal connection/session(can have more than one connection) uses .5mb memory to hold session related information and then depending upon what your sessions are doing (sql queries) it consumes memory ; one of the memory parameter pga_aggregate_target you might want to take a look and investigate. See following query it might give you some more insight.
    SELECT vses.username || ':' || vsst.SID || ',' || vses.serial# username,
    vstt.NAME, MAX (vsst.VALUE) VALUE
    FROM v$sesstat vsst, v$statname vstt, v$session vses
    WHERE vstt.statistic# = vsst.statistic#
    AND vsst.SID = vses.SID
    AND vstt.NAME IN
    ('session pga memory', 'session pga memory max',
    'session uga memory', 'session uga memory max',
    'session cursor cache count', 'session cursor cache hits',
    'session stored procedure space', 'opened cursors current',
    'opened cursors cumulative')
    AND vses.username IS NOT NULL
    GROUP BY grouping sets( vses.username), vsst.SID, vses.serial#, vstt.NAME
    ORDER BY vses.username, vsst.SID, vses.serial#, vstt.NAME;

  • Job in BODS is failing with an error " Your system is running low on process virtual memory".

    hello,
    I am facing an error with one of my job which is running on BODS server. The job is failing daily since last one year with the same error " Your system is running low on process virtual memory". We checked with team which deals with space issue and the space is sufficient enough.
    Please help me with this error and what can be done to do away with this.
    Regards,
    Ritu Sharma

    Greetings Narendra,
    It may help if you were to explain in more detail the software product you are encountering this issue. There are about 500 different products that might be encountering this issue. Specifying which product you are using will assist the Forum Team in providing an appropriate response.
    Thank you,
    Rob
    Technical Engineer
    Customer Assurance

  • Do uninstalled apps appearing on app world consume memory

    Hi folks,
    I see every uninstalled app in a list on my Curve 9300. I have not been able to delete those entries (is there a way to clean up this list?)
    My question is: These apps do consume memory on my device?
    (if I totalize the size of the apps it does not match the memoty consumed)
    thank you for your answers
    Sergio @ Lima

    No, only the apps themselves are saved on your computer. A backup will contain your apps content and settings, but if you remove an app from the iPad then it will no longer be included in future backups (and you can only restore the whole iPad from a backup, you can't restore individual apps).

  • Db2acd Process consumes all available CPU.

    Folks,
              We are on DB2 9.5 and we have recently updated the FixPak to 4 on the Sandbox environment.
    The environment is flatlined on cpu with the db2acd process consuming as much cpu as it can. If you stop the system this process does not stop, you have to physically kill it.
    Has anybody else had issues with this process ( db2 health monitor ), I think it was previously known as db2hmon.
    We are not sure if the problem existed before the FixPak upgrade, however we cannot upgrade our FixPaks with confidence.
    The operating system is aix 6.1.
    Thanks
    Regards Russell

    Hi Russell,
    perhaps this is the problem:
    IC63064: THE DB2ACD PROCESS SHOWS HIGH CPU USAGE:
    https://www-304.ibm.com/support/entdocview.wss?rs=203&context=SW000&dc=DA410&dc=DA450&dc=DA430&dc=DA440&dc=D600&dc=D700&dc=DB510&dc=DB520&dc=D800&dc=D900&dc=DA900&dc=DA800&dc=DB540&dc=DB400&dc=DB560&dc=DB530&dc=DA600&dc=DB550&dc=DA420&dc=DA460&dc=DA470&dc=DA480&dc=DA4A10&dc=DA4A20&dc=DA4A30&dc=DA400&dc=DA500&dc=DB700&dc=DB600&q1=IC63064&uid=swg1IC63064&loc=en_US&cs=UTF-8&lang=all
    Contact SAP/IBM for a special build.
    best regards,
    Joachim

  • Temporarily disable many of extensions will consume memory when using firefox ?

    If temporarily disable some extensions, would be used to reduce firefox memory usage by it? Or after installation is complete, whether open or close these extensions , it all will consume memory.

    Disabled extensions shouldn't use extra memory, but most extensions don't use much memory anyway.
    You can try to compare via the about:memory page (open that page via the location bar like a website).

Maybe you are looking for