Noise reduction lost during export?

Hi everybody
I'm having a very strange issue in the last few days. I work on a picture and when I export it the noise reduction is gone in the generated jpg.
Please have a look at the screenshot... the image on the right is the image I see in lightroom... the one on the left is the jpg exported.
I'd glad is some could explain why is this. I shoot with a Sony a7.
Thanks.

There is nothing for Adobe to fix.  They are not going to do a full export computation every time you tweak any slider—that would take seconds per slider move and there’d be a lot more complaints about how slow LR is than there are about people who wish LR was magic.
You’ll have to learn how to sharpen in LR, rather than assuming a Fit view is how things would look when exported at an arbitrary size. 
Laura Shoe has a good review about the three phases of sharpening:  Capture Sharpening, Creative Sharpening and Output Sharpening, where what you’re doing in Develop is only phase 1:
1: http://laurashoe.com/2011/08/21/sharpening-in-lightroom-part-one-overview-and-capture-shar pening/
2: http://laurashoe.com/2011/09/27/creative-sharpening-in-lightroom-sharpen-eyes/
3: http://laurashoe.com/2012/07/11/sharpening-in-lightroom-part-three-output-sharpening/

Similar Messages

  • Lightroom 5 no noise reduction on file export

    Here are the steps I'm using:
                   color and luminance noise reduction
    Export with these settings:
                   jpeg ( same result with tiff}
                   quality 100%
                   resize to fit long edge 1000 px
        Lighroom screen--------------------------------------------------------Jpeg export
    Any ideas?

    JimHess wrote:
    I think it's unfair to refer to people who can provide reasonable answers as fanboys.
    Sadly Jim, we still haven't got the kind of "ignore whiney, flamebaiting troll" button that would allow us to shut the likes of him up. No, he doesn't come here for solutions, he comes here to flame. I'm baffled why he hasn't been banned.
    Torsten,
    Here's my favourite workaround. You could have done it too, and it's a simple, one-step solution:
    Don't pay for software without thoroughly testing it yourself first.
    If you've paid for Lr 5 before destruction-testing it and keeping a close eye on the forum (where this issue has been know about for ages), you've only yourself to blame.
    Adobe will fix it when they're ready and able to: but it doesn't affect me in any "I paid for this, I expect it to work" way, because I won't be buying Lr 5 until it is fixed.
    A really, really, really simple, inexpensive, trouble-free way to deal with all that stress...

  • Why is my noise reduction lost in photoshop elements editor?

    I took some star shots recently in RAW format. When I open them in elements, I first get a window that lets me make changes to the RAW file, including exposure, clarity, sharpness, noise reduction... etc. I adjust the noise reduction with the luminosity sliders and get a good looking picture (a lot of noise removed). However, when I click "Open Image" to get it into the editor, it loads the image into the work space with all of the RAW edits I just made, except the noise reduction (it reverts back to the original amount of noise). Why is this and how can I stop it from happening?

    The top larger image is the "after" I save (.png form), the screenshot within photoshop is the "before"...
    I've also tried to the merge layers beforehand as well, but it actually just displays the image as if it were the saved version, with the noise coming through extremely hard. I just didn't save it yet.
    I appreciate the suggestion!

  • Anamorphic setting and chapters lost during export

    Hi, I know "not another anamorphic thread"... but I cant find my solution anywhere so any help would be much appreciated.
    Ok let me explain what happend from start to finish. Recently I have been capturing anamorphic SD footage off of DV tapes using FCP 6.0.6. Everything was working smoothly. I would capture, then I would edit and add markers then export to QT movie. I would then take the edited anamorphic footage into DVDSP 4.2.1. DVDSP would recognize it as anamorphic and I would burn my wide screen dvd with chapters in place.
    However I had to randomly capture a VHS last week and ever since everything has not been working as it did before.
    Now what happens is this: I capture the the SD anamorphic footage off the DV tape. The capture works correctly, the capture is anamorphic. Then I bring that correct footage into FCP do my editing and add chapters and export using QT movie. The exported footage appears not anamorphic and squished (skinny). If I try to bring that export into DVDSP the program recognizes it as 4:3 squished and my chapters are missing.
    What the heck is going on????
    All my settings appear correct. I am selecting "Current settings" and "chapter markers" on export. I have even manually selected "anamorphic" on export. Nothing works. I literally have hundreds of SD anamorphic DV tapes to put on DVD and this hiccup is driving me crazy. I have trashed the preferences, trashed the project. Started fresh several time and NOTHING has helped.
    Thanks

    @joey848
    The method you describe is a work around that I have been using, but it still does not address why the work flow has changed. My FCP markers always worked in DVDSP until I transferred that VHS. They always worked, I have a stack of about 75 DVDs I made using the markers created in FCP. Also in DVDSP I never had to manually change the DVD to 16:9. DVDSP would recognize it as wide screen an automatically adjust to fit properly. Now it always sees the footage as 4:3 unless I manually adjust it. I can make it work its just several extra steps, and when your talking about 100s of dv tapes you are looking at A LOT of wasted time.
    @Doody
    I am not working with iDVD I am working with DVD Studio Pro
    I appreciate the responses, but neither really solve this mystery.
    Thanks anyway

  • Noise Reduction on slideshow or image export

    Hello, does any one know why the Noise Reduction does not work when creating a slideshow or exporting the image ? It simply ignores my noise reduction settings.

    Which version of Lightroom are you using.

  • Exporting JPEG = loosing Noise reduction and sharpening, poor quality compare to RAW

    Hi guys,
    I bought LR 5.0 not even a month ago and I was so excited to use it.
    Now that I am done working on my projects I exported them as JPEG into my hard drive. This is a disaster. My pictures are amazing in my lightroom as RAW now you should see what they look like in JPEG. I can't believe it. I obviously did something wrong but I can't figure what it is. My JPEG pictures looks extremely grainy. I did shoot at a High ISO for most of them. It is probably the real problem here but there's certainly a way to make it work in JPEG since it looks good in RAW. Please tell me what to do from there. How can I keep the same quality in JPEG than I already have in RAW? I choose JPEG - quality 80% or 100% (tried both) - sRGB. Should I resize the image too?

    Are you applying export sharpening, which would exacerbate any remaining noise-grain?  Are you judging the sharpening and noise-reduction at 100% 1:1 zoom?  You have to, otherwise, the resampling-for-display algorithms in LR and your OS viewer might be doing something completely different.

  • "noise reduction" not applied to exported photos

    I've always used iPhoto to slightly modify my photos, before exporting and sharing or uploading to Flickr.
    But, since yesterday, the exported photos do not include my "Reduce Noise" modifications. When I export them, they include the color, retouch and so on, but they look as they were BEFORE I applied the "Reduce Noise" filter.
    When I look at them in the browser, they appear WITHOUT noise reduction.
    When I press space to see them zoomed, they appear WITHOUT noise reduction.
    When I double-clic to switch to edit mode, they appear WITH noise reduction.
    And when I export them (either by dragging and dropping to the desktop or an application, using the export function or opening in an external editor), they appear WITHOUT noise reduction.
    I have tried to delete the preferences of iPhoto, but the behaviour of iPhoto remains the same.
    This applies to all the photos I've tried it onto. And this never happened before yesterday.
    I didn't install anything new, I have no plug-ins or things like that. I've repaired the permissions, even restarted and zapped the PRAM. The only thing I've done recently is install Aperture with the 30 days trial offer. Could this be the origin of the problem?
    iPhoto is an important tool for me and has always worked perfectly. I hope someone will help me solve what is a big problem for me.

    I sent to the trash the iPhoto preferences I could find and launched it again
    This time, I got the same behaviour, but also got console messages, as follows:
    *18/05/08 00:51:17 [0x0-0xa1ba1b].com.apple.iPhoto[54170]* objc[54170]: Class PlugInLoader is implemented in both /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/BilateralFilter.plugin/Contents/MacOS /BilateralFilter and /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/BlackAndWhitePointsFilter.plugin/Cont ents/MacOS/BlackAndWhitePointsFilter. Using implementation from /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/BlackAndWhitePointsFilter.plugin/Cont ents/MacOS/BlackAndWhitePointsFilter.
    *18/05/08 00:51:17 [0x0-0xa1ba1b].com.apple.iPhoto[54170]* objc[54170]: Class PlugInLoader is implemented in both /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/BlackAndWhitePointsFilter.plugin/Cont ents/MacOS/BlackAndWhitePointsFilter and /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/BlackAndWhiteFilter.plugin/Contents/M acOS/BlackAndWhiteFilter. Using implementation from /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/BlackAndWhiteFilter.plugin/Contents/M acOS/BlackAndWhiteFilter.
    *18/05/08 00:51:17 [0x0-0xa1ba1b].com.apple.iPhoto[54170]* objc[54170]: Class PlugInLoader is implemented in both /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/BlackAndWhiteFilter.plugin/Contents/M acOS/BlackAndWhiteFilter and /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/SepiaFilter.plugin/Contents/MacOS/Sep iaFilter. Using implementation from /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/SepiaFilter.plugin/Contents/MacOS/Sep iaFilter.
    *18/05/08 00:51:17 [0x0-0xa1ba1b].com.apple.iPhoto[54170]* objc[54170]: Class PlugInLoader is implemented in both /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/SepiaFilter.plugin/Contents/MacOS/Sep iaFilter and /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/SaturationFilter.plugin/Contents/MacO S/SaturationFilter. Using implementation from /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/SaturationFilter.plugin/Contents/MacO S/SaturationFilter.
    *18/05/08 00:51:17 [0x0-0xa1ba1b].com.apple.iPhoto[54170]* objc[54170]: Class PlugInLoader is implemented in both /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/SaturationFilter.plugin/Contents/MacO S/SaturationFilter and /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/ColorCorrectionFilter.plugin/Contents /MacOS/ColorCorrectionFilter. Using implementation from /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/ColorCorrectionFilter.plugin/Contents /MacOS/ColorCorrectionFilter.
    *18/05/08 00:51:17 [0x0-0xa1ba1b].com.apple.iPhoto[54170]* objc[54170]: Class PlugInLoader is implemented in both /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/ColorCorrectionFilter.plugin/Contents /MacOS/ColorCorrectionFilter and /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/LightingFilter.plugin/Contents/MacOS/ LightingFilter. Using implementation from /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/LightingFilter.plugin/Contents/MacOS/ LightingFilter.
    *18/05/08 00:51:17 [0x0-0xa1ba1b].com.apple.iPhoto[54170]* objc[54170]: Class PlugInLoader is implemented in both /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/LightingFilter.plugin/Contents/MacOS/ LightingFilter and /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/EffectsFilter01.plugin/Contents/MacOS /EffectsFilter01. Using implementation from /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/EffectsFilter01.plugin/Contents/MacOS /EffectsFilter01.
    *18/05/08 00:51:17 [0x0-0xa1ba1b].com.apple.iPhoto[54170]* objc[54170]: Class PlugInLoader is implemented in both /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/EffectsFilter01.plugin/Contents/MacOS /EffectsFilter01 and /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/EffectsFilter05.plugin/Contents/MacOS /EffectsFilter05. Using implementation from /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/EffectsFilter05.plugin/Contents/MacOS /EffectsFilter05.
    *18/05/08 00:51:18 [0x0-0xa1ba1b].com.apple.iPhoto[54170]* objc[54170]: Class PlugInLoader is implemented in both /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/EffectsFilter05.plugin/Contents/MacOS /EffectsFilter05 and /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/RemoveBlemishFilter.plugin/Contents/M acOS/RemoveBlemishFilter. Using implementation from /Applications/iPhoto.app/Contents/PlugIns/RemoveBlemishFilter.plugin/Contents/M acOS/RemoveBlemishFilter.

  • Noise Reduction Export

    I used noise reduction on a clip with a fade in, but when I export the noise reduction doesn't kick in for the first second of audio. Does this have something to do with doing a fade in?

    I'm having the same problem...in Premiere, when I play through the timeline, the noise reduction is applied very effectively to every clip.  You never hear the background noise.  However, when I export and playback in QuickTime, every time a new audio segment begins in the video, the first few seconds play the original, unaltered audio (with no noise reduction), then suddenly the noise reduction kicks in and audio sounds good.
    Here is a export that demonstrates the problem pretty well:  https://vimeo.com/47687525
    I'm just now making the switch from Final Cut to Premiere so I don't even know where to start troubleshooting!  Surely this is not the way the noise reduction effect is supposed to function in Premiere...there's got to be a fix without using Audition.
    Any ideas?

  • Export of noise reduction does not look like Develop preview

    Hi,
    I have a photo that has noise reduction applied, however, after export, it looks as if NO noise reduction has been applied.  Other photos look like they have the noise reduction applied.  Not sure why this one would refuse to export the noise reduction filter.  In the Develop preview, it looks great, no noise. After export, noise.
    Different but possibly related, On all photos, I noticed that the noise reduction preview in Develop doesn't update unless I zoom-in/zoom-out, then it updates it. But if I make any adjustments to the slider it doesn't update until I zoom-in/zoom-out again.  This seems like a bug.
    Lightroom version: 3.0 [677000]
    Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3 (Build 2600)
    Version: 5.1 [2600]
    Application architecture: x86
    System architecture: x86
    Physical processor count: 2
    Processor speed: 1.8 GHz
    Built-in memory: 2047.2 MB
    Real memory available to Lightroom: 716.8 MB
    Real memory used by Lightroom: 252.1 MB (35.1%)
    Virtual memory used by Lightroom: 400.0 MB
    Memory cache size: 51.7 MB
    System DPI setting: 96 DPI
    Displays: 1) 1680x1050, 2) 1440x900
    Thanks in advance for any help, and sorry if this has already been reported.
    tek

    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    Lee Jay wrote:
    danpancamo wrote:
    Here's the CR2 file
    https://rcpt.yousendit.com/1005742637/a865add0e167c8fdfac02211e4345a60
    TO recreate the problem
    1. import the CR2 into LR3.3
    2. In the Develop Module  change Noise Reduction Luminance and Detail to 100
    3. In the Library Module export to Hard Drive with 100% Quality no Sharpening
    4. View the JPG and compare to the LR3 views...  
    The two are virtually the same, as far as I can tell.
    It looks like the 1:1 issue in Develop view biting me again... If you view the image in develop view in less thatn 1:1 it looks great.
    Man the 1:1 view issue is annoying!   I want the image to look the way it does in Fit/Fill mode....     Is there a way to do this?
    If I export th CR2 to JPG then Import the JPG then appy NR to the JPG and export, I get the results im after....  there's got to be a better way?

  • Background noise reduction

    I would like to find a way to reduce the amount of background noise/hissing from my file.
    I have been importing audio (music) from a cassette tape directly into Soundtrack. After making the necessary edits to the track I have been using the "Bitcrusher" effect to improve the "punchiness" of the sound. Then I have been exporting to iTunes as an .aiff file, followed by an import for iTunes and the file is transferred into my music file. Then I burned to a CD.
    The sound is just okay and there is definitely a loud hissing noise as the volume is turned up. Does anyone have suggestions on how to:
    a. Improve the overall quality of the sound?
    b. Reduce the mount of background hissing/noise
    The noise is not very apparent during playback on my computer just when I play it back on CD.
    Thanks!

    Bob,
    Soundtrack Pro (STP) is currently at 1.0.3.
    Where you have a section of your audio with no voice but background noise, did you use that as your noiseprint (STP, menu bar: process then set noiseprint) or as the section for Bias Soap to learn? After that, use the tool settings to listen to what either program is actually taking out (STP, menu bar: process then reduce noise, or Soap, and click noise only in either one). I typically reduce the amount of noise reduction to ensure I'm not affecting the voice (you don't want to hear the voice in noise only mode). Then I listen to it normally to ensure I haven't over done it on the noise reduction.

  • Iphoto11, noise reduction dont save. it goes retour to de original if i restart the programm.

    If i use "noise reduction", iphoto maks it. it works. but if i quit the photo or copie the photo, ist lost de reduction effect.
    (sorry for my englisch)

    I'm suffering this same problem. Any changes I make to the de-noise slider are lost when the file is exported. Within iPhoto itself, the changes are visible. But the exported image shows none of the noise-reduction. I've noticed that this bug is present on all large images. Smaller-size photos do not seem to be plagued by this problem, however. I do hope that this bug is fixed soon.
    David Mills
    Huntington, WV

  • Noise Reduction is a PITA! Will this ever get easier?

    One of the things (and there are many) that I like about LR is the
    non-desctrcutive nature of the changes it makes. Recently I had a couple a
    hundred shots where I had to use ISO 1600-3200. The LR noise reduction can
    not hold a candle to the 3rd party tools. I use Noise Ninja myself. In order
    to make sure that I had the best image to work from I had to export from LR
    as a PSD in 16 bit and then run NN on the PSD file. The resultant PSD file
    is 4 times larger than the DNG in LR. I now also have to deal with 2 files.
    I remember reading about an SDK for LR that should allow NN and others to do
    this in the same way that LR does its edits in a non destructive fashion.
    Is there any progress on this front?
    Does DxO 5 offer this?
    The current way is really akward.

    L. Little,
    I haven't lost all hope that Adobe will get more into this. Raw Shooter Pro did not have near the issues with NR that LR has, had some nice pre-processing aspects for Noise (you can set up similar things under LR), and did not seem to create the issues frequently seen in LR especially with High ISO. Hopefully Adobe can pull more of that into the product. I think, from some of the readings on forums, that the whole NR engine in LR was a new redesign, maybe this is a case of "if it isn't broken, don't fix it" at play, with that comes a desire to make whatever the new design is work.. so I guess we'll have to see if the refinements keep coming. I don't think they can ignore all the complaints from people.
    The possibility of 3rd party tools linked in from the folks at Noise Ninja, Neat Image, etc. is also something to look forward to. For high ISO images, I tend to let NR tools in CS3 handle the exported JPG after I've done any other adjustments, as opposed to sending it out via conversion, and bringing it back into LR.
    Jay S.

  • Microfon problems s400 with noise reduction

    Hello people,
    have a problem with the microfon sound.
    This recording is either noisy (without HD driver and with HD drivers without noise reduction) or it is distorted (with HD drivers and noise reduction).
    Drivers I've tried from the Lenovo page and also from Realtek already.
    here are a few tests
    Noise: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1182020/test% 20HD% 20with% 20the%% 20treiber 20nachhallred.wma
    distortion: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1182020/test% 20with% 20HD% 20treiber% 20with% 20rauschunterdr% C3% BCckung.wma
    in the device manager for microphone stands for the version: 6.2.9200.16384 Microsoft.
    Use Windows 8 Pro which I installed by myself.
    Would be grateful for suggestions, I can not skype otherwise.
    greeting

    Dark areas have less bits to encode their values so a single bit of noise is a higher proportion of the total value.
    For the basis of the default processing, to match the human eye’s response to dark and light, darker areas are brightened more than bright areas, using a non-linear gamma curve.  This magnifies the noise in darker areas.
    If you boost the brightness of dark areas using Shadows or Clarity, you are making that noise even more visible.   Think of brightening as digitally increasing the ISO. 
    Adobe’s noise-reduction is calibrated to the original photo’s ISO setting, not how much you have digitally increased the ISO by brightening it, so if you have magnified the noise by extreme processing, you may be beyond what maxing out the NR sliders are calibrated to remove.
    Exporting sharpening will sharpen any remaining noise.
    Are you using the Mask slider in sharpen to keep from sharpening the noise grain in the Detail section?  Use the Alt key while moving the mask slider to determine the optimal Mask level for a particular photo, where you can’t to have the edges indicated but not the wide areas of little detail.
    It’s hard to guess what you’re seeing without seeing a screenshot.

  • How do I permanently disable Detail (sharpening / noise reduction)?

    I did this a while ago with the LR3 beta, but I forgot how I did it.
    Anyway, I want to disable Detail (sharpening and noise reduction) in the right hand panel forever, so that when I import new pictures, it's disabled by default when I start developing them (so I don't have to disable it manually for each picture, which is very annoying). The reason is, I handle sharpening & n.r. as a separate step outside of LR (export as TIFF and then n.r. and sharpen).
    Any hints please? I know it's simple, I just can't remember it.
    Thanks.

    first select an image, then drag the Sharpening Amount and Noise slider to zero, next choose Set Default Settings from the Develop menu. When dialog opens hit the Update to Current Settings button. If you have photos from more than one camera model you'll need to repeat process for each camera. The following tutorial should might also be worth reading http://www.computer-darkroom.com/lr2_camera/lr2-camera-defaults.htm

  • How do PS CS3 Noise Reduction Filters compare with dedicated third-party plug-ins?

    Am I missing something by not installing a dedicated Noise Reduction application into my PS CS3? Can Neat Image, Noise Ninja, Noiseware Pro, etc. do something that the PS CS3 Noise Filters can't do? Do these third-party aplications do it better?
    Since I like flashless photography, and I generally carry with me small-sensor compacts when I travel, I'm frequently confronted with the problem of digital noise. I've always wondered how the third-party noise reduction applications perform in comparison with the Photoshop Noise Filters. I hope someone in this Forum has been able to acquire direct experience on this topic and will be kind enough to share this experience with us.
    Kindest Regards,
    Conrad

    Conrad,
    ACR 4.3 has better NR (noise reduction) than previous versions and can handle NR in most normal situations. However, available light photography with a small pixel sensor may require more NR and the specialized plugins such as Noise Ninja, NeatImage, and NoiseWare Pro can do a better job. I have all three and they do an excellent job, but I currently use NoiseWare most of the time.
    Here is a demonstration of NoiseWare vs ACR NR, using 100% crops of an image taken with the Nikon D200, 1/320 sec at f/2.8. The image is reasonably sharp at normal viewing conditions, but has quite a lot of luminance noise. It was rendered with ACR and the settings were exposure +0.85, brightness +60. One thing you learn early in this type of shooting is to expose to the right to reduce noise, but this may conflict with stopping action and reducing camera shake. More exposure would have helped this image, and one should try to avoid exposures requiring this amount of positive exposure adjustment.
    The results are shown below, followed by some discussion. Other comments are welcome. Color noise is not prominent in this image and I left color NR at its default.
    ACR, No sharpening, no NR
    ACR, Luminance NR 53, no sharpening
    ACR, No NR, No sharpening, NoiseWare default, no sharpening
    Noise reduction and sharpening are antagonistic processes. It is important that NR is applied before sharpening--you don't want to sharpen noise. Following NR there is an inevitable loss of detail, and some sharpening is necessary to restore the detail, but this also brings back the noise. One can use masks and blend if sliders in Photoshop in both NR and sharpening to mitigate some of these effects, and Bruce Fraser discusses the details in his excellent book on sharpening.
    If you use an add on such as NoiseWare, you should turn off luminance sharpening in ACR. In doing so, you lose all those nifty sharpening features that have recently been added to ACR. I leave color NR at the default. It has a minimal effect on detail.
    In adjusting the NR in ACR at 100% viewing, I estimated that a luminance setting of +53 was optimal. Beyond that, blotchy artifacts appear in the image.
    For NoiseWarePro, I used the default settings with no sharpening. The NR effect is dramatic, but detail is lost and some sharpening is needed. This could be applied in NoiseWare or in Photoshop, perhaps with a plugin such as PhotoKit Sharpener. Personally, I have found that PK does not work well with this type of image because it bring back noise and produces artifacts.
    In all of these examples, sharpening is needed following the NR. One could try to use surface masks to keep sharpening in Photoshop with the unsharp mask away from the edges. However, I find it is difficult to get a good surface mask, and I don't take the trouble.
    For now, I use the sharpening built into NoiseWare. I don't know how it works internally, but it does have a slider for detail protection, and you can play with this to get the best result. It would be best to have the robust NR of the add ons built into ACR much like NoiseNinja is built into Bibble Pro. However, this is an ACR forum and I would expect that ACR is the preferred raw converter of those who frequent this forum.
    After expending this much effort on the post, I hope to get some helpful feedback.

Maybe you are looking for