Nokia 6225 and Sprint/other providers questions

I'm thinking of signing up with sprint, getting the Pictures Pack service(for wireless internet) and the Nokia 6225 phone. This is all to test a j2me CLDC 1.0/MIDP1.0 application I'm developing. Does anyone have any experience with this phone? It seems to be earning praise generally. I want a device that is fairly 'average' and would likely be owned by college kids.
Also, if anyone has experience with the Sprint service, it does allow downloads of third party java apps, correct?
Any comments on the phone, sprint's service(the other main provider in my area is cingular), OTA provisioning of ava apps etc. are appreciated.
Finally, what phones/providers DO NOT allow downloads of third party java apps, provided that the phones support java? Is it just those with BREW?

Sprint does allow download of third party java apps! But keep away from Samsung phones. They apparently don't allow third party application to open a HTTP connection.

Similar Messages

  • 10.3.5 sluggish on my iMac (and some other newbie questions)...

    I just purchased an iMac, and am brand-new to Macs. I can do anything on a PC, and actually do PC tech support for a living, so you can imagine that I feel completely ridiculous asking some of these questions, but here goes:
    1. How do I copy and paste? Ctrl+C does not work.... surely there is another alternative?
    2. Is there a way I can download OE for Mac? I know Microsoft no longer offers downloads or support, but if there is another place I could find ol'familiar Outlook Express, that would be fantastic.
    3. My browser (either IE or Safari) is not completely maximized. There's the area below, and an area to the side with some icons as well... is this the maximum size of the browser, or...?
    4. Right now I'm running OS 10.3.5, which seems a bit sluggish. It came installed. I also have the discs for 8.6, and if it will make the system run better, I'll definitely ''downgrade.'' How would I do this? Do I have to ''reformat'' or anything like that?
    5. Are there other tweaks, sort of like MSCONFIG, that will help speed up my system in general?
    Here are my system stats:
    iMac (Grape!), 333MHz, 6GB Harddrive, 196 MB RAM...
    It's a G3 CRT, I think (if that matters).
    Any help would be so much appreciated!
    Tiffany
    ([email protected])

    Hello Tiffany,
    First of all, Welcome to the Apple Discussions!
    In regards to your #4, I would just suggest running Software Update (after upgrading the RAM memory if possible) and upgrading to the latest version of 10.3 that should be offered to you, ie. 10.3.9). As the other posters have suggested above you should upgrade your RAM to at least 256 MB. With any updates to system software, remember to Repair Permissions from Disk Utility found at HD/Applications/Utilities/Disk Utility before and after the update.
    There are many "tweaks" and troubleshooting information for OS X that you can perform to get the best from your OS and machine.
    Some great information can be found @:
    http://www.thexlab.com/faqs/faqs.html
    A great tip, as your machine has a very small amount of Disk space is to run a little app called Delocalizer that will free up alot of space taken from Foriegn language files. The link to it can be found in Dr. Smoke's FAQ for "Freeing space on your Mac OS X startup disk".
    hope that helps some,
    littleshoulders [:-)

  • IMac 21.5" performance on COD4 and few other general questions from a newbi

    I'm a current and long time PC owner who is sick of messing with registry problems, performance issues and viruses.
    I am strongly considering the purchase of a 21.5" iMac, but have some reservations as to whether I may have performance issues playing Call of Duty 4 using Parallels or Boot Camp. Will the 21.5" machine with the upgraded 256K video card handle this and other games OK? Other than that, I am a light user who mainly surfs the web, sends email and tracks finances with quicken. Games and some video are about the heaviest applications I use.
    Currently on a 3 year old Pentium Duo Dell with 2GB ram, 512mb Nvidia video card.

    I'm just extremely concerned that the 21.5" iMac won't have enough juice for multi-tasking such as playing COD4 while surfing the net. Even my hopped up gaming PC (older dual core with 512K video card) struggles at times. I'm wanting to make the jump to Mac, just afraid of spending almost $1500+ and winding up with worse performance than I already have.
    Unfortunately, the nearest Mac retailer is over an hour away from me so there isn't a real chance to put one through it's paces in person.

  • I have an iPhone 4, My itunes are from two differnt accounts; one from when I was under my dads account, and the other is my own. My question is would I be able to sync and update my itunes on my MacBook without having all the new music erased.

    I have an iPhone 4, My itunes are from two differnt accounts; one from when I was under my dads account when i was younger, and the other is my own which i currently use. My question is would I be able to sync and update my itunes on my MacBook without having all the new music erased. I have the icloud on my phone, but I just want to update my music on my laptop. Just nervous to, because it has happened to me before on a desktop computer  and it *****. Please help! Thanks.

    nevermind, i figuered it out

  • Adding a RAID card to help speed up export (and other drive question) in Premiere Pro CC

    First of all, I have read Tweakers Page exporting section because that is where my primary concern is. First my questions, then background and my current and proposed configurations:
    Question 1: Will adding a hardware RAID controller, such as an LSI MegaRAID remove enough burden from the CPU managing parity on my software RAID 5 that the CPU will jump for joy and export faster?
    Question 2: If true to above, then compare thoughts on adding more smaller SSDs for either a one volume RAID 0 or smaller two volume RAID 0 to complement existing HDD RAID 5. That is, I'm thinking of buying four Samsung 850 Pro 128 GB SSDs to put in a four disk volume to handle everything (media/projects, media cache, previews, exports), or split it up into two volumes of two disks each and split the duties, or keep the four disk volume idea and put the previews & exports on my HDD RAID 5 array.
    The 850's are rated at SEQ read/write: 550/470 MB/s thus I could get around 2000/1500 MB/s read write in a four disk RAID 0 or 1/2 that if I split into two volumes to minimize volumes from reading/writing at the same time, if that really matters with these SSDs?
    The Tweaker's page made a few comments. One is splitting duties among different disks, rather than a large efficient RAID may actually slow things down. Since the SSDs are much faster than a single HDD, I'm thinking that is no longer accurate, thus I'm leaning toward the Four disk configuration putting OS & Programs on C drive, Media & Projects on D (HDD RAID 5), Pagefile & Media Cache on SSD (2-disk RAID 0) and Previews &Exports on 2nd SSD RAID 0 (or combine the two RAID 0's and their duties).
    Just trying to get a perspective here, since I haven't purchased anything yet. Any experience/stories, I would appreciate.
    My current drive configuration:
    My D drive is software RAID 5 consisting of four 1 TB Western Digital RE4 (RED) 7200 RPM HDDs with a CrystalDiskMark SEQ Read/Write of 339/252 MB/s.
    The C drive is SSD 500 GB (Samsung 840 (not Pro) and does 531/330 MB/s. My OS, Program Files and Page File are on C, and data/media files/project, etc all are on the RAID drive.
    Problem:
    Current setup allows for smooth editing, only the exporting seems slow, often taking between two and two and a half times the video length to export. Thus a 10 minute video takes 20-30 minutes to export. 15 minute video can take 30-40 minutes to export. The first 10% of the two-pass export takes under a minute (seems fast), but it gets slower where the final 10 or 20% can hang for many minutes like my system is running out of steam. So where is the waste?
    I have enabled hardware acceleration (did the GPU hack since my GPU isn't listed) and it may spike at 25% usage a few times and eat up 600 MB of VRAM (I have 2 GB of VRAM), otherwise it is idle the whole export. The CPU may spike at 50% but it doesn't seem overly busy either.
    Our timeline is simple with two video streams and two audio streams (a little music and mostly voice) with simple transitions (jump cuts or cross dissolves). We sometimes fast color correct, so that might use the GPU? Also, since we film in 1080 60P and export 1080 29.97 frames/sec, I think that is scaling and uses the GPU. I know without the GPU, it does take a lot longer. I have ruled out buying a faster GPU since it doesn't appear to be breaking a sweat. I just need to know if my system is bottlenecked at the hard drive level because I'm using software RAID and my disks are slow and will hardware RAID significantly reduce the CPU load so it can export faster.
    Our files are not huge in nature. Most our clips are several MBs each. Total project files are between 5 GBs and 10 GBs for each video with Windows Media File export being 500 MB to 1.2 GB on average. We shoot using Panasonic camcorders so the original files are AVCHD, I believe (.MTS files?).
    Considerations:
    1. I'm thinking of buying (and future proofing) an LSI Logic MegaRAID 9361-8i that is 12Gb/s SAS and SATA (because some current SSDs can exceed the 6Gb/s standard).
    2. I'm not replacing my current RAID 5 HDDs because not in my budget to upgrade to 6 or more large SSDs. These drives are more important to me for temporary storage because I remove the files once backed up. I don't mind a few inexpensive smaller SSDs if they can make a significant difference for editing and exporting.
    I can only guess my HDD RAID is slow but the CPU is burdened with parity. I would imagine running RAID 10 would not help much.
    My setup:
    my setup:
    CPU - i7-3930K CPU @4.5 GHz
    RAM - G.SKILL Ripjaws Z Series 32GB (4 x 8GB) DDR3 2133 @2000
    Motherboard - ASUS P9X79 WS LGA 2011
    GPU - Gigabyte GeForce GTX 660 OC 2GB (performed the compatibility list hack to enable hardware acceleration).
    C drive - 500 GB Samsung 840 SSD (Windows 7 Pro 64 bit and programs).
    D drive - four 1 TB WD RE4 Enterprise HDDs 7200 RPMs in software RAID 5
    Case - Cooler Master HAF X
    CPU Fan - Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO with 120 mm fan
    Power Supply - Corsair Pro Series AX 850 Watt 80 Plus Gold
    Optical Drive - Pioneer BDR - 208DBK
    thanks in advance,
    Eric

    ........software RAID 5 off the motherboard ??????......NOT a good idea, from what I have read here on this forum from experts like Harm Millard and others. They have mentioned a LARGE overhead on the CPU doing this....causing sub-par performance. RAID 0 off the motherboard will NOT do this, however.....RAID 0 would provide optimum speed, but, with the risk of total data loss if ANY drive fails. You may wish to reconfigure your RAID to be RAID 0...BUT...you would need to DILIGENTLY back up its entire volume onto perhaps a quality 4TB drive very frequently.
         A lot depends on the nature of your current and FUTURE codecs you plan to edit. You may not want to sink a lot of money into an older setup that may have trouble with more demanding future codecs. For now, in the 1080p realm, your rig should be OK....the read/write performance on your CURRENT RAID 5 setup is not great, and a definite drag on the performance. The rest of your components appear to be fine.....the Samsung SSD, though not ideal, is OK.....it's write speed is WAY lower than the Pro model,but, the drive is used mainly for reading operations. Since you have Windows 7 Pro, and NOT Windows 8.......you CAN put the entire windows page file onto the RAID 0 you might create.....this will take that frequent read/write load OFF the SSD. Read the "tweakers Page" to see how to best TUNE your machine. To use your current setup most efficiently, without investing much money, you would :a. create the RAID 0 off the motherboard, ( putting all media and project files on it )  b. install a quality 7200rpm 4TB HDD to serve as a BACKUP of the RAID array. Then, install a Crucial M550 256GB or larger SSD, ( close in performance to Samsung 850 Pro...much cheaper), to put all previews, cache , and media cache files on....AND to use as " global performance cache" for After Effects...if you use that program. Exporting can be done to ANOTHER Crucial M550 for best speed...or, just to the either the FIRST Crucial or, the 4TB drive. Your current GPU will accelerate exports on any video containing scaling and any GPU accelerated effects. Your CPU is STILL important in SERVING the data to and from the GPU AND for decoding and encoding non-GPU handled video....your high CPU clock speed helps performance there ! You may want to check out possibly overclocking your video card, using MSI Afterburner.or, similar free program. Increasing the "memory clock speed" can RAISE performance and cut export times on GPU effects loaded timelines,or, scaling operations. On my laptop, I export 25% faster doing this. With my NEW  i7 4700 HQ laptop, I export in the range of your CURRENT machine....about 2 to 3 times the length of the original video. PROPERLY SET UP...your desktop machine should BLOW THIS AWAY !!
        Visit the PPBM7 website and test your current setup to possibly identify current bottlenecks,or, performance issues. THEN, RE-TEST it again, after making improvements to your machine to see how it does. Be aware that new codecs are coming (H.265 and HEVC,etc.) which may demand more computer horsepower to edit, as they are even MORE compressed and engineered for "streaming" high quality at a lower bandwidth on the internet. The new Haswell E...with its quad-channel memory, 8 core option, large number of PCI gen. 3 lanes, goes farther in being prepared for 4K and more. Testing by Eric Bowen has shown the newer PPro versions provide MUCH better processing of 4K than older versions.

  • Suggest improvements for nokia n73 and other devic...

    Nokia n73 is the most succsesful device ever made by nokia. But you noticed that the images taken by the n73 are little blury and the video is also poor. If theres is nothing harware problem why not nokia fix theme with software update. Why not nokia try to make n73 just like n78. This will be great if nokia update n73 software and fix the problem. N78 also powerfull device but its buttons make it lazy. N78 will be more greater if its button replaced with bigger and esiar. And the improved new device will launched n78i.
    Personal info removed
    Message Edited by shameers on 23-Feb-2009 10:21 AM

    I would not bother getting a nokia at the moment.....
    If you can live without nokia drive for now then i would hold back for atleast 6 months and see what happens.
    Nokia have slipped down the chain a bit and are not as almighty as they use to be.
    There are loads of probs with the Lumia 800 and the 710 is not all that good compared to nokia's of old.
    I got the 710 because of nokia drive and it is no where near as good as the old Ovi navigation...
    In fact the whole phone is a let down....with poor camara, poor sat nav, poor speaker and poor battery...
    The Actual phone is a nice design and the screen is not bad...WP7.5 looks interesting but still needs a lot of work to catch up with the others.
    Not sure what the Omnia is like...but if i knew then what i know now about the 710 i would of gone for the HTC Radar and just used my N8 for Sat Nav.

  • I have an iphone 4 from Russia....my question is : Can i use an iphone 4 from Russia in other countries and with other sim cards?

    i have an iphone 4 from Russia.my question:can i use an iphone 4 from russia in other countries and with other sim-cards?

    If officially unlocked, yes.

  • How does Smartware handle backing up two drives to My Cloud...and other Smartware questions

    When you set up backup from two disk drives on one PC to My Cloud via Smartware, do they both backup simultaneously, or do I need to do one, then the other? I have a Windows 8.1 laptop with two hard drives, one is 500GB, the other 1 TB. After installing My Cloud (3TB) and Smartware, I went into Smartware and set up my backups. I selected various folders on each drive to back up, and I also set up two different folders on My Cloud to receive these files. Setup is like this: PC Drive ->                                 My Cloud FolderSeveral folders in G: drive ->    Pictures, Video folder on My CloudDesktop and User folder onmain drive                           ->     Users folder on My Cloud Every time I open my PC at home, I start Smartware, click the Backup tab and let the backup continue. I feel like I need to manually go into the Home and Backup tab for each backup plan (one per drive) and restart it. Regardless, my question is this: is Smartware able to handle these two drives on my laptop backing up onto My CLoud? Other Smartware questions:- Does my PC have to be on my home network (where My Cloud is installed) in order to run Smartware? Can I be on the internet outside of my home and run Smartware?- I run Outlook 2010. Will Smartware back up the latest Outlook file automatically as new files are created (basically, every time I run Outlook)? Much appreciated. - Paul M.

     
    Hello,
    When you set up backup from two disk drives on one PC to My Cloud via Smartware, do they both backup simultaneously, or do I need to do one, then the other?
    You will need to do one first and then the other and the last one that is selected will be done automatically.
    - Does my PC have to be on my home network (where My Cloud is installed) in order to run Smartware?
    Yes.
    Can I be on the internet outside of my home and run Smartware?
    WD Smartware does not perform remote backups. 
     

  • Scratch disk and other setup questions

    Hello, I am a long time Premiere user but have never been involved with the setup. I have decided to start doing personal video editing on my gaming computer and have run into some questions.
    The biggest one I have is with the scratch disk setup. I've read the help doc about 10 times and googled every combination of terms I can think of but am still unsure how I should set these for my setup.
    I have Premiere Pro CS5 installed on my C:, which is a 128 GB SSD
    For storage I have 4 1TB drives in Raid 5, so 2.72 TB total storage.
    How do I want to set up my scratch disks for best possible performance?
    Question 2: This might be related to scratch disk setup, I'm not sure, but something I have always wondered. Which disk should I save my projects to in this configuration? Does it matter? Then, do I want to render my final video to that same folder or to another disk?
    Question 3: I currently have a GTX 460 graphics card and am enjoying the benefits of CUDA acceleration. I have been looking at adding a second in SLI for gaming purposes, but have read that the Mercury Playback Engine is not compatible with SLI. Does this mean that it will still just work with one card and I will see no benefit in premiere, or that all CUDA acceration will cease?
    Thanks guys, I really appreciate the help.

    Alright, so I have the hdd's in the case and am setting up where to place everything, but each of my drives is different, so I am hoping someone can suggest best practice on which drives should hold what. I can rearrange any drive to suit any purpose you guys would suggest, but here is what I currently have set up:
    C: - 128 GB SATA III SSD
    D: - 150 GB 10k VelociRaptor
    E: - 250 GB Caviar Black
    F: - 4x 1 TB Spinpoint F4 7200 RPM in RAID 5
    Here is how I am currently planning on using these drives:
    C: - OS, Programs
    D: - Media, Projects
    E: - Previews, Exports
    F: - Pagefile, Media Cache
    When I am finished with a project I move the exported file onto my media server, so that is why I set the export onto the smaller drive and media cache onto the RAID.
    Does this look good or would you guys suggest a different orientation for better performance?
    And one other question, this time regarding RAM. I currently have 6 GB of DDR3, 3 x 2 GB. I have been reading all about how moving up to 24 GB would be very beneficial, and since it really isn't all that expensive, I am planning on doing so. My question is that, I have watched the task manager while rendering and exporting my videos and I've only ever seen RAM usage hit 1.8 GB. I wondered why it didn't get close to using all 6, but didn't worry about it too much. But now that I am hearing 24 would be helpful, I am wondering if I have something set up wrong that is stopping Premiere from using all my RAM?
    Thank you guys so much for the help.

  • Nokia drive and other apps for other windows phone...

    i saw on the net abt the pirated versions of nokia s best gps app being used on other windows phones and with partnership of microsoft will there be nokia apps available officially on the marketplace ..? and m confused between nokia 710 and samsung omnia w.. both priced the same and omnia with front cam but i need the gps navigation for sure more than frnt cam..now the point is if nokia makes their apps available for other devices then no point in buyin any phone in intrest .. i got this doubt coz i read nokia maps coming to other devices and also the EA games ???? pls suggest

    I would not bother getting a nokia at the moment.....
    If you can live without nokia drive for now then i would hold back for atleast 6 months and see what happens.
    Nokia have slipped down the chain a bit and are not as almighty as they use to be.
    There are loads of probs with the Lumia 800 and the 710 is not all that good compared to nokia's of old.
    I got the 710 because of nokia drive and it is no where near as good as the old Ovi navigation...
    In fact the whole phone is a let down....with poor camara, poor sat nav, poor speaker and poor battery...
    The Actual phone is a nice design and the screen is not bad...WP7.5 looks interesting but still needs a lot of work to catch up with the others.
    Not sure what the Omnia is like...but if i knew then what i know now about the 710 i would of gone for the HTC Radar and just used my N8 for Sat Nav.

  • Posible p4n diamond heat problem and other beep question

    Hi   was using my p4n diamond for about 2h 30min and it all of a sudden just cuts out with no warning.
    im unsure if its heat related thought the constant 55C is not as good temp as i should probably have but it stays stable there.
    Also when i recently installed msi core it said i was very close to the voltages it had in the display just to hope to rule out power problems.
    i have the cases 120mm exaust fan in the back an 80mm input fan in thefront and then the cpu fan that came with my pentium d 830 .
    if its heat related should i get another 80mm fan as an exaust or an 80 mm input fan. i have one more spot on the door of the case.
    ----other beep question--
    I was also wondering about the beeps on my computer. when i first was working with this pcc i had no beeps but then when working i had one beep  before os   then two after os and usb case plugs and floppy , 3 when i put on a printer and then back to one and then no  beeps.
    are these my beeps going down related to my heat or is this mother board short lived . one beeps soposed to mean that its loading properly
    thanks
     

    regarding your question about target temperature. my board isn't exactly the same as yours, but it's close.
    you are right that you can lower the target temp and it will tend to cool the cpu because the fan runs faster at a lower temperature. the way i set up mine was to DISABLE the target temp and that gives the fan full voltage at all temps. that way, the fan rpm will bottom out at 2250rpm (instead of 1100rpm up to the target temp) or so even at lower temps.
    also keep in mind that your cpu temp in the bios disply should be a few degrees HIGHER than the temp in "idle windows".
    the intel data sheet for the pentium D 8xx series says that the max temp is 69C. so your cpu shouldnt have a problem at 55C.
    i ran a prime95 primality test for about 17 hours at 60C to test stability (while using the computer for my normal foreground tasks) and didn't have a problem. i'm NOT recommending this. but i wanted you to know that this cpu doesn't have a problem with temps in the 60C range. and that msi motherboard will stand up to rough treatment.
    also, in my humble opinion, i would NEVER run those msi windows utilities. they may be causing you a problem with stability. i use speedfan from almico to monitor temps and i have it set up to generate sound and visual warnings at certain temps. the F1 docs are good. if it were my system, i would go so far as to reinstall windows and format the C: to get rid of core center. i wouldn't even trust the uninstall unless you're good enough to surgically remove it manually.
    also make sure you turn off EIST in the bios. it wont impact your temps significantly. that nvidia nforce sli intel edition has a problem with 14x multiplier and pentiumD. and EIST bumps you down to 14x occaisionally.

  • FTP Proxy not being denied (and some other questions)

    I have a simple BM37+NW6SP5 test server for testing rules prior to moving them to production (2x BM38+NW65SP6). Recently we tried to block all access to FTP sites and allow only a select group of users access. The rules on the test proxy looked something like this:
    1. Action: Deny / Source: Any / Access: URL / Dest: SurfControl
    2. Action: Allow / Source: FTP_User_Group / Access: FTP Proxy / Dest: Any
    3. Action: Allow / Source: WWW_User_Group / Access: URL / Dest: Any URL
    Default Rule:
    4. Action: Deny / Source: Any / Access: Any / Dest: Any
    Yet with this setup, anybody in the WWW_User_Group (but not in the FTP_User_Group) was able to access FTP. I temporarily closed the hole by doing this ruleset:
    1. Action: Deny / Source: Any / Access: URL / Dest: SurfControl
    2. Action: Allow / Source: FTP_User_Group / Access: FTP Proxy / Dest: Any
    3. Action: Deny / Source: Any / Access: FTP Proxy / Dest: Any
    4. Action: Allow / Source: WWW_User_Group / Access: URL / Dest: Any URL
    Default Rule:
    5. Action: Deny / Source: Any / Access: Any / Dest: Any
    I don't understand why I have to explicitly deny access to FTP Proxy for this to work. I think the rule that grants access to URL for WWW_User_Group is also allowing FTP access. If I turn that rule into a Deny rule in the first ruleset, it deny's all FTP (as well as all HTTP).
    Also, we are using SurfControl to block access to certain categories. I read that the URL rule only affects port 80 requests (which would seem weird when its affecting my ftp proxy over port 21 above). How would I go about blocking those same categories over HTTPS?
    Finally, does anybody have any general guidelines on how many rules should exist in a typical medium business BM environment (assuming modern hardware)? I'm trying to get the customer to avoid adding so many adhoc rules as the production environment is pretty complex which is why I am testing on a test proxy with few rules to avoid accidental rule overlap. I'm going to have to do an audit of their existing production environment and prefer the KISS principle when it comes to rule definitions.
    P.S. Since most sites require both a HTTP and HTTPS rule, almost every desired "rule" in BM needs to be repeated twice to allow (or deny) secure communication as most websites switch to SSL from the launcher (non-ssl) parent page. The rulebase expands quite quickly and gets confusing due to this.

    cam wrote:
    > Perhaps I should have said that this was being tested using normal dos
    > FTP. Open a command prompt, type FTP proxyservername, open
    > [email protected](for example), etc... no browser involved, but
    > that does bring up another point of WHY do I need a dozen rules to block
    > access to a single site over a single protocol?
    Then you're doing something wrong or you're not telling the whole
    settings. your rule was calling nds groups so you need authentication
    enable and the checkbox for " Authenticate only when user......."
    unchecked. Then the syntax once you open the connection to the ftp proxy
    is ndsusername@[email protected]. In your example there is not
    nds authentication.
    you do not need ANY rule to block a single site. The default rule will
    do for you. If you do not make an specific allow one, then sites will be
    blocked.
    Even if I use a web
    > browser and access it as ftp://, it should use the FTP protocol, not
    > the HTTP protocol.
    When your browser is configure to go thru proxy and you access a ftp
    site, you'll hit two situations with IE:
    1. With default settings, IE will use its miniftp client build in and
    try to access the ftp site directly. that can fail if there is a
    firewall stopping this traffic as it will bypass bm.
    2. If the option "enable ftp folder view" is unchecked and the "use pasv
    ftp..." checked, IE will encapsulate ftp traffic into http and send it
    to border, to the http proxy. So bm gets http traffic, remove the http
    envelope and makes a ftp connection to the ftp server. But to apply
    rules, this is a http traffic thru http proxy. A single LAN trace on the
    server will show you this behavior
    Firefox always uses the configured proxy settings.
    > Regarding the point you bring up about HTTPS, I can't wrap my mind
    > around how if this is true, we can still keep things secure and safe.
    > Let's look at a single website, www.novell.com. The novell.com domain
    > is not listed in a SurfControl category filter that places would
    > normally block. Therefore most approved internet users would be able
    > to access it. Now let's say you go to www.novell.com and log into the
    > user portal; it switches to HTTPS! Without an allow port 443 rule,
    > this should fail then. However, if that's the case, I need to know
    > that this website needs access to port 443, so I am forced to manage
    > another rule for port 443. This rules destination filter will grow to
    > thousands if not millions of websites as almost every valid website
    > known to man requires HTTPS if they want you to create a login on their
    > site. This is unmanageable.
    You;re exaggerating here.You will need indeed an port 443 rule but this
    is how it works. SSL traffic and normal http traffic are two very
    different things. But with a single allow all port 443 you can
    accomplish here. Read below
    > So you're solution is to create a Destination ALL rule for Port 443.
    > While this removes the need to manage a list of millions of websites,
    > it now opens you to all the vicious websites (domains listed in blocked
    > categories in SurfControl for example) which use https. My company pays
    > Websense thousands of dollars a year to block certain categories of
    > websites, but if any of those websites use HTTPS, based on what you are
    > telling me it seems it is impossible to block it using SurfControl since
    > the Deny Port rule does not allow a Destination of ANY third party
    > filter.
    The allow all port 443 it has to be placed after the surfcontrol one and
    after other third party rule or websense or whatever you use to block
    specific sites. that means that the allow all port 443 only will be hit
    if surfcontrol and other rules above this one did not find a match. If a
    match is find, bm applies the rule and stop reading so if it hits a site
    that websense or SF blocks, it will block it, regardless of the allow
    all port 443.
    Also you can make an allow port 443 with a domain name destination, just
    for specific destination
    if sites are on the blocked category for SF then it will blocked. You
    can go to SF website an check it and if it is not blocked then is a SF
    problem not a bm and you should contact them.
    Gonzalo

  • Nokia 6205 and PC Suite

    I can get my phone to connect and be recognized by PC Suite but, it will not authenticate. Does anyone know if there is a solution for this? I contacted Nokia tech support and they said my service provider (Verizon) was not allowing this functonality. However, PC Suite worked fine on my previous Verizon Nokia phone and when I contacted Verizon - they said there was no reason it should not work. Verizon has not done anything to limit such functionality in the phone.

    Have you tried another USB port in your PC ?
    or
    PC - desktop - my computer -right click with mouse - manage - device managre - see how th ephone is visible in list. If question marks etc. highlight- right click- uninstall
    Boot PC and try again.
    You should have the USB mode question popiing up in phone screen everytime you connect. Select dafault

  • Nokia 6225 - DB errers

    Hello Friends,
    Nokia 6225 - DB erase �s
    We have an application running under Nokia 6225, when ever application produce �Application Error� or some inconsistence due to some problem with the network or abnormal exist etc., we are facing DB erase problem. i.e. all the stored data under locally is getting deleted and user need to create one more time
    Let me know if any one come across this kind of issue and have a solution for this
    Thanks and regards,
    Kumar.M.R

    This is due to application error (due to open threads), so under nokia 6225 it creates separate new db and old db (absorbed) will not be access by next time result all the stored values looks like erased

  • Who has nokia 701 and WhatsApp ? Please enter

    I'd like to know if turning 3G off on the nokia 701 (or any nokia belle), and being in an area without wifi - Will whatsapp still work? Because from what I understand, Whatsapp is always connected. Does that mean that Whatsapp will force my phone to connect over 3g EVEN IF I TURNED  3G OFF? 
    This question is directed at people running Belle because you have the option to turn 3G off from the notifications menu. Please check that out, turn Wifi and 3g off and let me know if Whatsapp created a data connection, or not? 
    I wanna be able to control my data and so I dont want Whatsapp to open my 3g for whatever reason, can i be sure? 
    THANKS.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Hi unger123,
    Thank you for your post.
    It is true that Whatsapp is always sucking data because it delivers message instantly, so it has to be connected at all time. But when you turn off 3G and wifi, Whatsapp should not be able to connect to the internet. Your messages will then get delivered once you reconnect.
    Hope this helps, 
    Sergent
    If my response has helped you in any way, show it by hitting the WHITE STAR... If you don't a MONSTER will come and eat your lunch...
    Also hit the Accept as solution button, so OTHERS can benefit from this helpful answer...
    DON'T BE SHY...

Maybe you are looking for