NON 3rd party offsite server backup solutions....?

Can anyone recommend a method of an off-site server backup solution that doesn't involve a 3rd party company?
I'm new to server admin and the company I work for is sitting on tons of really, really confidential and sensitive data that we ardently protect on-site, but with all the inclemental weather we've been getting lately (and horror stories from other local businesses regarding their server rooms flooding and such) we've been considering options for offsite backups, but don't want an outside source to have any access to our server contents/data/info in way way shape or form (as in: our backups would be on one of their servers---we don't want to go that route).
Right now we CCC everything everyday to an on-site external drive and then CCCing the server backups onto another external hard drive which then gets taken off-site to the admin's home and brought back in when a backup is going to be made (about once a week for that one).
Any thoughts?
We're absolutely not above buying a second server and running it out of somebody's house for this purpose...but the details of how to configure it as a backup server aren't very clear to me.
Any help is appreciated!
Thanks!
Is there a better way to do this?

ssh/rsync works well for me at home -- local server with a backup copy plus a copy on my brother's server nearly 3000 miles away. Of course, I recommend shipping physical media containing an initial backup to the offsite backup location first to save on bandwidth and time. (Depending on your connection.)
My script is basically:
{quote}
backup()
    src=$1
    dst=$2
    rsync -abz --delete --delete-excluded $src $dst
    echo "Backup starts: `/bin/date`"
    echo ""
    backup /Volumes/backup/Backups.backupdb/computername/Latest/ \
        onsite_server:computername
    backup /Volumes/backup/Backups.backupdb/computername/Latest/ \
        offsite_server:computername
    echo ""
    echo "Backup ends: `/bin/date`"
} > backup.log
rsync -abqz backup.log offsite_server:backup.log
ssh offsite_server "~/bin/backup-complete.sh"
{quote}
backup-complete.sh just emails me using the contents of backup.log as the email body. I used keys for authentication.

Similar Messages

  • Inconsistent rendering on 3rd party hosting server

    Originally, I had uploaded my Muse site to my 3rd party hosting server and none of the formatting or images displayed. I re-uploaded the whole site and now some pages are fine and some are not. For example, I compared the source code for http://spiderinkdesign.com/test/about.html (which displays fine) with the source code for http://spiderinkdesign.com/test/exhibitions.html (which is a mess). The code seems the same and the menu for each is practically the same, the only difference is that "exhibitions" in the submenu should show up as active on the exhibitions page.
    Additionally, other pages display ok but the portfolio function does funky things where the thumbnail images disappear arbitrarily. See http://spiderinkdesign.com/test/etchings.html. The first thumbnail disappears when others are clicked. This happens on all the portfolio pages. Other pages are just missing images.
    So, I've tried uploading the site again incase there was a glitch in the file transfer process with no luck. The site works beautifully on Adobe's business catalyst server http://spiderinkstudio.businesscatalyst.com/about.html. This does not help me as I want to stick with my old hosting setup.
    These issues are not related to ftp permissions problems as Adobe's tech support suggested. So, what am I to do?

    Interesting .... your third party one has completely different coding?
    <meta name="Generator" content="Cocoa HTML Writer">
    Looks like you brought it into another editor first?
    Edit: Although I need admit I have yet to try a third party host because it just makes more sense to me to use BC.
    Message was edited by: Brad Lawryk

  • What is the difference between Outlook features using exchage server and using 3rd party mail server ?

    Hi~ I'd like to know what the difference is between Outlook features using exchage server and using 3rd party mail server.
    If I use 3rd party mail server with Outlook, Outlook features are the same as Exchange Server ?
    I want to use all Outlook features..

    The basic features (and many advanced features) are identical in all accounts. With pop3, your mail, calendar, contacts, tasks, notes are stored in a pst and are only on the computer. IMAP accounts only sync email back to the server, not calendar,
    contacts, and tasks. Outlook.com EAS accounts (aka Hotmail) syncs calendar and contacts back to the server. Exchange mailboxes stores everything on the server - mail, calendar, contacts, custom views, rules - and if you open the mailbox in outlook on
    any other computer, the mailbox is identical. Because everything is on the server, you'll have much better syncing with smartphones and tablets with Exchange mailboxes.
    Calendar sharing, open other users folder, and retention policies are Exchange-only. Mail Tips and apps (linked under the reading pane header in Outlook 2013) are Exchange-only.
    Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
    Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center
    Outlook Tips
    Subscribe to Exchange Messaging Outlook weekly newsletter

  • 3rd party ssh server in SMF

    3rd Party SSH Server:
    =================
    I am using a 3rd party ssh application. I did add this to the startup through SMF and I got this error in my console.
    I copied the ssh.xml and revised some lines from manifest(ssh.xml) and revised particularly the below entries
    *1. [Since this ssh server has no config (as I knew). I removed this entry so that it won't look for such config entry related]*
    <dependency name='config_data'
    grouping='require_all'
    restart_on='restart'
    type='path'>
    <service_fmri
    value='file://localhost/etc/ssh/sshd_config' />
    </dependency>
    *2. [I point the exec where the executable file resides]*
    exec='/usr/local/sbin/sshd start' <== modified
    exec='/lib/svc/method/sshd start' <== default config
    *3. [I point the exec where the executable file resides]*
    exec='/usr/local/sbin/sshd restart' <== modified
    exec='/lib/svc/method/sshd restart' <== default config
    I rebooted the machine and here is the aftermath.
    Jul xx 18:33:11 svc.startd[7]: svc:/network/ssh:default: Method "/usr/local/sbin
    /sshd start" failed with exit status 255.
    Jul xx 18:33:12 netrat1 sshd[299]: FATAL ERROR: Extra arguments in command line
    Jul xx 18:33:12 netrat1 sshd[319]: FATAL ERROR: Extra arguments in command line
    Jul xx 18:33:12 netrat1 svc.startd[7]: network/ssh:default failed: transitioned
    to maintenance (see 'svcs -xv' for details)
    I would really appreciate your help for this.

    See those posts:
    content repository with web center
    Re: How to Integrate  Webcenter and MS Sharepoint

  • IPhone MobileMe Incoming & 3rd Party Outgoing Server Help!

    Okay this is my first post and any help on this would be greatly appreciated. I have a MobileMe account and I setup my account on my iPhone and that works great. However since most people do not know my @me.com address I want to use a 3rd party outgoing server (hosted by GoDaddy.com) and the server needs to use port 80 and SSL off. I have not been able to get SSL turned off, I can set it to off but it instantly goes back to ON and I am unable to send e-mail using my outgoing mail server with SSL turned on. I have setup Mail on my MBP with using the incoming server as MobileMe and the outgoing server as my godaddy.com account (with SSL off and using port 80) and it works perfect. On my laptop I am able to send e-mails using my MobileMe account but instead of showing it coming from MobileMe it shows coming from my own domain. And all e-mails sent to my domain get forwarded to my MobileMe account and all of this works perfect on my laptop but I cannot get it working on my iPhone. Incoming e-mail on the iPhone is not a problem as I can receive everything since my domain is forwarding all e-mail to MobileMe. It's just sending e-mail I cannot get it to send using my outgoing server from godaddy. Thanks for your time in this matter.
    Regards,
    Jeff

    I see what you're saying, but actually I was trying this with my iPhone connected via Wi-Fi to my home network (connected to Rogers). So although what you said makes sense, it doesn't apply to my case, I don't think. I have set it up to authenticate my user name on Rogers to permit outside access.
    I still think it has to do with not being able to re-name my e-mail address to @Rogers.com, not @me.com. If this field could be edited, like on my iMac, then I'm pretty sure it would work. I don't know what the work-around is. If I try to add Rogers as a new account and have my mail sent from there, then my sent messages won't appear under my Me account on my iPhone, and it'll be a mess. I'd really like to keep everything inside one account.

  • Can POSReady 7 run a 3rd party DNS server?

    Hi everyone,
    Long story short, we'd like to install a lightweight, 3rd party DNS server onto one of our POSReady machines.  I'm not very familiar with the architecture of the OS, so I'm not sure if this is possible...  
    Is there a way to install an application that supports 'All versions of Windows 7' onto a POSReady machine?  Would I need to application white-list somehow, or is this a dead end?  
    Thanks!

    POSReady 7 is Windows 7 with some extra lockdown features. You can install applications just like Windows 7. Per the license agreement: Full Office is not allowed, but parts of office are allowed for use with your system.
    The only way to know if the application will work is to try it out.
    www.annabooks.com / www.seanliming.com / Book Author - Pro Guide to WE8S, Pro Guide to WES 7, Pro Guide to POS for .NET

  • Mac OS X Server Backup solutions?

    Hi all, I have built up my network with 3 Leopard servers running on Mac Pro's and 8 mac clients (one mobile)
    Between all of them there is about 12TB's of storage space (about 2TB being used at present)
    it really is time to now invest in a complete backup solution and we won't a format that can be taken offsite (Tape sounds the best)
    I really have hardly any experience in this area and need to get some advice.
    I have an ATTO Ultra320 card in one of the Mac Pro's so need to figure out which tape drive (or drives) which software and the best way to implement it.
    All the clients are on OD so not overly bothered about backing them up, just the 3 main servers really.
    Any help would be really appreciated, thanks.

    Here's some grist for the thought mill...
    The use of "Removable" here likely (probably?) means "remote", which itself (and depending on the bandwidth of the network connection or access to couriers or such) may or may not actually be a removable disk or removable tape storage, or disk or tape libraries.
    What's the volume of the actual data? What's the rate of change of the data? There are two parts to the calculation for the creation and operation of the archive, the initial archive and the occasional (weekly, monthly, before an upgrade) full archive, and then the incremental (hourly, daily, weekly) archives. This assumes the usual two-level archive processing; an occasional full and a more frequent incremental.
    You need to figure out how big these activities are, and what your backup window is. These details then drive the available hardware and media options and then the device selection.
    Then determine (or guesstimate) the growth rate of the data. That tells you what your approach can support now, and how quickly your backup window (if you have one) might be closing. And (if you're using smaller media) when you might need to go to a larger-capacity media or to multi-volume archives. Right now, you can probably get most everything onto a 1 TB or 1.5 TB spindle, for instance.
    You'll also need to sort out the local and continuously-active processing activities, and how to get copies of those. The sqldump tool, for instance, can be the path to get a recoverable installation. And that processing tends to be part of getting a recoverable archive.
    There are cloud services around for storage and (if your change rate is less than the bandwidth "slop" available within your current network pipe) to a remote site that you manage or contract with; to a storage site or to warm site you work with, or out to an Amazon S3 or other competing storage pool. (There are various options for archiving out into Amazon S3, for instance. And Time Capsule and Time Machine is seriously slick.)
    Never assume that RAID is an archival strategy. It's not. RAID is useless against application corruptions, blown software upgrades, user errors, client and server and storage theft, and malicious-user activities. Nor against roof-mounted heat exchanger system that sprout leaks that then pour red-colored coolant into the server racks. RAID protects against disk spindle failures and (for some specific configurations) against certain other "upstream" storage controller failures.
    When you get all done, make sure you can recover and restart using your archives. Periodically test the recoverability of the archives.

  • BE6K on 3rd Party HP server

    Can I load BE6K on a 3rd party HP UC supported Vmware server?

    Yes, from a technical point of view, you can use the 6K OVAs (I'm assuming it meets the HW reqs), BUT, we won't call it a 6K, nor we support it if you do that. If he HW meets the requirements from virtualization wiki, and you use OVAs approved for non 6K, or 6K AND non 6K deployments, then we would support it, but as a regular install.
    If this is for a production environment, that's a huge no.
    You can reach pre-sales if you're a partner, or a Cisco Gold partner for info of the current options for a 6K, but it's a bundle, HW + SW + licenses, right now we have medium density (4 app + prime) and HD (8 apps + prime), not sure about the server models we're currently selling with each.

  • ICal server and external invitations via 3rd party mail server

    Hi everyone,
    OS 10.6.5 Server:
    Services running
    AFP
    DNS
    iCal
    Open Directory
    Push Notification
    We are currently testing iCal server and have configured it to send out invites via our mail server (which is running on a different server) by creating the com.apple.calendarserver user on our mail server.
    Email notifications are then configured under the Enable Email Invitations tab in the iCal service of Server Admin as follows:
    IMAP
    Email address: [email protected]
    Incoming server: mail.mytest.com
    Port: 143 (not using SSL)
    Username: com.apple.calendarserver
    Password: secret
    SMTP: mail.mytest.com
    Port: 25 (not using SSL)
    Server requires authentication
    Username: com.apple.calendarserver
    Password: secret
    My test OD users are able to send out invites both internally to other iCal users and externally via email.
    So for example, I invite someone to a meeting and enter their gmail address ([email protected]), the invitation goes out correctly - when I log into gmail I see the invitation.
    When responding to the invitation (clicking Yes), the mail server receives the response from gmail and the iCal server collects the message via IMAP.
    However, the iCal server doesn't seem to parse the received email correctly as I get the following error in the iCal error logs:
    [twistedcaldav.extensions#info] Cannot authenticate proxy user 'com.apple.calendarserver' without X-Authorize-As header
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] 2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [AuthorizedHTTPGetter,client] [twistedcaldav.mail#error] Mail gateway failed to inject message <[email protected]> (Reason: 400 Bad Request)
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] 2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [AuthorizedHTTPGetter,client] [twistedcaldav.mail#debug] Failed calendar body: BEGIN:VCALENDAR
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] VERSION:2.0
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] METHOD:REPLY
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] BEGIN:VEVENT
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] UID:43121576-1183-40C8-82D8-A052754AD1CE
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] DTSTART:20110406T080000Z
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] DTEND:20110406T090000Z
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] ATTENDEE;[email protected];CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;PARTSTAT=DECLINED;RO
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] LE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:[email protected]
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] CREATED:20110303T062518Z
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] DESCRIPTION:
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] DTSTAMP:20110303T064335Z
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] LAST-MODIFIED:20110303T064335Z
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] LOCATION:
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] ORGANIZER;CN=com.apple.calendarserver+07b1c044-9d98-4cdc-afe3-48139218ee35
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] @mytest.com:urn:uuid:B72794FB-3242-48D7-AC22-A584D279B9F9
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] SEQUENCE:3
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] STATUS:CONFIRMED
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] SUMMARY:one more test
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] TRANSP:OPAQUE
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] END:VEVENT
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway] END:VCALENDAR
    2011-03-03 17:44:03+1100 [-] [mailgateway]
    I have set a rule on our mail server to bypass any spam filtering for all messages sent to the [email protected] address, but this doesn't seem to make any difference.
    Does anyone else have this working ? Any ideas ?
    Many thanks
    Message was edited by: gen_bunty
    null

    The issue is not "user authorization". The issue is that the 3rd-party service does not accept all incoming relay requests unless there is authentication with a registered account (which we have). This protects the 3rd-party service from becoming the relaying host for the universe's spoofed and anonymous spam. My deduction is that there is no mechanism in UTL_MAIL to designate not only the 3rd-party ip-address:port (by-passing the local sendmail server) but also providing the username:password for the account there for authentication.
    Plan A: I have attempted to follow directions for client-side SMTP Authentication for Relaying on the sendmail.org site.
    I have not been successful in completing a simple mailx interactive test, much less completing a UTL_MAIL configuration.
    I am scouring the user universe for someone who has put all the pieces together successfully and can advise. . . .
    Edited by: StevenInTallyFl on Mar 26, 2010 3:50 PM
    to clarify that I cannot get from UTL_MAIL to 3rd-party IP directly

  • How to link files to DIR which are in 3rd party File Server?

    Hi, guruu2019s
    This is ben,
    We have one typical requirement,
    Client using third party File Server to store their current documents [files].
    Now client upgrading SAP, so now they want just link those documents [files] to SAP DMS, which are stored in File Server.
    Condition
    Only link has to be established from file server to SAP DMS.
    Files are stored permanently in File server only.
    As I know when we link or attach any file we have to chek-in to store files to SAP-DB or HTTP CS. Then only we have to access these attachments.
    Please help me regarding this integration.
    Points awaiting
    Rgds,
    Benaka

    Hi Benaka Rajes 
    You cannot link just Documents from a File net sever to DIR in SAP DMS. You are right. You will have to check in Documents into Secure Storage area.When we say secure storage area mean these documents are not accessed via windows explorer.So Integration with SAP DMS DIR and Documents would be a tedous Job.
    With Regards
    Mangesh Pande

  • Trying to publish iWeb created pages on a 3rd party webpage server...HELP!!

    I recently purchased iLife '06. My questions pretains to iWeb specifically. I have been laboring for hours trying to publish one page that I made to a third party web page server with absolutely no success. I am currently trying to upload my page to freewebs.com via the upload service they offer; would using FTP make a difference? Do you know of a free web page server that works with greater compatibility with iWeb? (i.e. not having to convert .png files to .jpg or .gif, etc.)
    PowerBook G4, 1GHz, 60GB, 512MB   Mac OS X (10.4.4)  

    Does your provider allow ssh/scp? I'm a UNIX admin, so I typically do all this stuff from a shell or via scripts that I run. But this is very easy, IF they allow scp.
    - Save iWeb to a directory (for the sake of this example, I'll say "~/sites"
    - Open up a terminal
    - Change directory to the sites directory
    cd ~/sites
    - Run the scp recursively
    scp -r * [email protected]
    It'll ask you for your password, then it'll transfer all the directories in "sites" recursively (i.e. all the file and directories in each directory).
    -Tom

  • NI Server Explorer Attempts to Start When a 3rd Party OPC Server is Referenced

    I am using Labview with a third party (Siemens) OPC server.
    On one PC the Labview application (which uses a data socket to read OPC items from the Siemens OPC server) works without any problem.
    On another PC the same Labview application opens a window/dialog looking for the NI Server Explorer.  It does not find it and leaves the PC in a endless loop while I try to cancel.
    I can not understand why one PC is behaving differently from the other?
    Both PCs are running the same Windows XP operating system, both are running the same Siemen's OPC server, but are running the same Labview application.
    How can I troubleshoot this issue?
    I have attached the Labview application for reference.
    Thanks,
    Bernie
    Attachments:
    OPC chart.vi ‏129 KB

    hi there,
    please compare the settings of all NI-related services and check for firewalls on both machines.
    btw.: if you have LV >6.1 i suggest o use the DataSocket functions. this should improve performance of your app a lot (see attachment. not tested!!). can you see the url defined in the vi when you open the URL-Browser "DataSocket Select URL.vi"?
    Best regards
    chris
    CL(A)Dly bending G-Force with LabVIEW
    famous last words: "oh my god, it is full of stars!"
    Attachments:
    OPC_chart_DataSocket_7.1.vi ‏123 KB

  • Advanced Server - Backup Solutions

    I'm needing to set up backup on my Advanced Server, but am aware Time Machine doesn't deal with Open Directory.
    The question is - will Carbon Copy Cloner 3.1 work fine? I'm very impressed with it's recent update, scheduling et al, so I'm leaning towards that.
    Of course, I need to ensure that it's going to be able to back up everything so a cloned drive can just be stuck in for a failover.
    On a related note, is it possible to run Time Machine on an Advanced Server - but just to back up user and group directories, and email?
    I know that on Standard and Workgroup, Tim Machine can stop the mailserver for long enough to snapshot the database - something mightily useful in my view. This would be great, but if Time Machine just won't play ball, what else (preferably open source and free), will do all this?

    Hi
    I have some knowledge of one site where MySQL DBs are being backed up funnily enough using Retrospect. Its not a large DB and as far as I know its at a testing stage. Things may have moved on a since then. As far as I know no issues. This is a 10.4.10 Server however.
    As for backing up a Mail Server? There has been some discussion regarding this over on the Mail Forums. My personal feeling is any backup of a constantly changing Mail service has the potential for being a problem.
    Alex (Pterobyte) has something which might be useful to you here:
    http://osx.topicdesk.com/content/view/41/41/
    I've not used this personally but many people have with no complaints. Beyond Apple's built-in Mail Server there are alternatives. One I am familiar with is Kerio:
    http://www.kerio.com/kms_home.html
    This has a built-in Archive and Restore facility that backs up all Mail to another volume (network or local) and zips the resulting file. This Archive can be backed up further using anything you like, even Retrospect. Another alternative to Apple's Mail Server is Communigate Pro, from what I've seen its very similar to Kerio.
    Tony

  • Synchronous Communication from 3rd party XI server

    Hi,
    I have the following XI landscape where the receiver system is on 1 XI server, and the sender system is on the other XI server, where between the 2 XI servers, the communication protocol used is HTTP.
    For synchronous communication between sender (SOAP client) and receiver system (SAP ABAP proxy), do I still have to prototype BPM in the sender's XI server to relay the SAP result via HTTP?
    Any advise will be greatly appreciated. 
    vivian

    Hi Vivian
    I don't know what you mean by "prototype BPM", but I don't think you need a BPM in this scenario.
    If I understand you correctly, the flow is as follows:
    1. Sender SOAP client makes synchronous call to first XI server.
    2. First XI server routes call to second XI server (probably using XI protocol) - still using synchronous messaging.
    3. Second XI server routes call to receiving system (synchronous ABAP proxy).
    4. Synchronous response propagates back the opposite way.
    In this case, there is no need for a BPM.
    Regards,
    Thorsten

  • Migration scenario from 3rd party mail server to GW12?

    Hi
    We need to migrate from existing e-mail server (Axigen ) to GW12.
    The main concern is how to do that as quickly as possible or step by step without disrupting mail traffic and users.
    Here is the situation:
    In local network there is mentioned Axigen mail server serving aprox 70 users at single location.
    Our official domain is hosted outside by Hosting provider where their mail server forwards all mail to our DDNS address where is ported to local mail server. Forwarding is performed discrete on user base. Each [email protected] is forwarded to [email protected]. where local server taking over.
    This setting is harder to maintain because it is necessary to maintain users and aliases on outside server manually. However, this setting has some advantages. First of all, forwarding is happened immediately. If for some reason , local server is unreachable, outside server will keep on trying for two more days.
    Second advantage is that we can use anti spam and virus blocking at the providers side.
    Both functionality we could'nt achieve with simple global forwarding of all mail to local server.
    This comment is digresion from main topic.
    Outgoing mail is relayed by local server over our Internet Connection provider's SMPT host.
    Local mail is delivered locally.
    We maintain local DNS server too.
    Most users are using POP service, while IMAP is used by few only. All users are using Thunderbird so far.
    All users in the future should use full GW capabilities with regular GW client, mobile clients and so on.
    GW12 server is installed and up already. It is tested locally and tested for remote sending. So, only remote receiving is not tested yet, so neither correct domain is set yet.
    Present users authentication is performed by Axigen server and LDAP connection to eDir. STARTTLS is used between clients and server.
    Our plan is simple to change local DNS record point to new GW server, to change NAT/routing point to new server and set correct domain for the GW server.
    We expect that this will be transparent for users while they will continue to use Thunderbird (certificate mismatch will be issued by first connection and first mail sending. But we plan to warn users in advance together with instructions what to do. My phone will ring that morning many times, I am sure). Few IMAP accounts we can prepare in advance by move mail manually to local folders and back to GW server later.
    Latest step should be migrate users from Thunderbird to GW client. This need to be perfomed manually at each user seat. Each Thunderbird client need to be switched to IMAP and then mail need to move to GW server.
    Here is concern about old mail volume. Many users have their old mail archived in local folders by years. Some of them has quite huge amount of archived mails with heavy attachments. However old mail can be moved gradually later.
    So, this is our plan. Does anybody has any suggestion, comment or wish to point some problem we didn't aware of?
    Thank you.
    Drazen

    On 9/24/2012 3:56 AM, dzuvela wrote:
    >
    > Hi
    > We need to migrate from existing e-mail server ('Axigen '
    > (http://www.axigen.com/)) to GW12.
    > The main concern is how to do that as quickly as possible or step by
    > step without disrupting mail traffic and users.
    >
    > Here is the situation:
    > In local network there is mentioned Axigen mail server serving aprox 70
    > users at single location.
    > Our official domain is hosted outside by Hosting provider where their
    > mail server forwards all mail to our DDNS address where is ported to
    > local mail server. Forwarding is performed discrete on user base. Each
    > [email protected] is forwarded to [email protected]. where local
    > server taking over.
    >
    > This setting is harder to maintain because it is necessary to
    > maintain users and aliases on outside server manually. However, this
    > setting has some advantages. First of all, forwarding is happened
    > immediately. If for some reason , local server is unreachable, outside
    > server will keep on trying for two more days.
    > Second advantage is that we can use anti spam and virus blocking at the
    > providers side.
    > Both functionality we could'nt achieve with simple global forwarding of
    > all mail to local server.
    > This comment is digresion from main topic.
    >
    > Outgoing mail is relayed by local server over our Internet Connection
    > provider's SMPT host.
    > Local mail is delivered locally.
    >
    > We maintain local DNS server too.
    >
    > Most users are using POP service, while IMAP is used by few only. All
    > users are using Thunderbird so far.
    >
    > All users in the future should use full GW capabilities with regular GW
    > client, mobile clients and so on.
    >
    > GW12 server is installed and up already. It is tested locally and
    > tested for remote sending. So, only remote receiving is not tested yet,
    > so neither correct domain is set yet.
    >
    > Present users authentication is performed by Axigen server and LDAP
    > connection to eDir. STARTTLS is used between clients and server.
    >
    >
    > Our plan is simple to change local DNS record point to new GW server,
    > to change NAT/routing point to new server and set correct domain for the
    > GW server.
    > We expect that this will be transparent for users while they will
    > continue to use Thunderbird (certificate mismatch will be issued by
    > first connection and first mail sending. But we plan to warn users in
    > advance together with instructions what to do. My phone will ring that
    > morning many times, I am sure). Few IMAP accounts we can
    > prepare in advance by move mail manually to local folders and back to GW
    > server later.
    >
    > Latest step should be migrate users from Thunderbird to GW client. This
    > need to be perfomed manually at each user seat. Each Thunderbird client
    > need to be switched to IMAP and then mail need to move to GW server.
    > Here is concern about old mail volume. Many users have their old mail
    > archived in local folders by years. Some of them has quite huge amount
    > of archived mails with heavy attachments. However old mail can be moved
    > gradually later.
    >
    >
    > So, this is our plan. Does anybody has any suggestion, comment or wish
    > to point some problem we didn't aware of?
    >
    > Thank you.
    > Drazen
    >
    >
    most of this sounds good. With such heavy imap/pop usage, you MIGHT
    want to consider installing a temporary dedicated gwia just for that
    separate from the smtp handling gwia. But that might not be necessary at
    all. 70 people isn't THAT much.

Maybe you are looking for