Non deductable Tax amount is not hitting in G/L at MIRO/GR

Hi
We have requirement as input 7.5% tax has to be loaded on material while GRN. and same has to hit on seperate G/L while MIRO.
The following settings has done and i am getting value in PO. But its not working in GR/MIRO..
1. Created the new condition type zusa with condition class D, calculation type %, Catag 1..accural key tick mark is selected..For my usa plant
2. created the acct key USA in OBCN as tax type-2, Non deductable, posting is 3..
3. in OB4O the G/l is maintained against the Accural key
4. In OBQ3 condition type is mainatined with acct key, accural key
5. Then in FTXP i maintained the tax code
6. FV11 against the condition 7.5% mainatined.
Finally while in PO tax is getting calculated, but GRN time , MIRO time there is no effect. system is taking the only Base price in Debit , credit at Inventory account. The tax calculated account is missing
Please susggest me

We have a Scenario thatu2026u2026. Tax Amount should Load on the Material but while capturing MIRO Tax Amount should post in Separate Accrual GL
Please find the below Accounting Entries.. which we need for the Businessu2026u2026.
Please suggest u2026u2026u2026
Please note the required accounting entry
GRN
Inventory DR    1100 (1000 Price + 100 Tax)
GR/IR     CR    1110
INVOICE
Vendor               Cr        1000
Tax Accrual        Cr         100
GR/IR                Dr        1100
my tax condition is getting calculated but it is not passing into the NAVS condition. can i have your  id ..so that i can send u

Similar Messages

  • Invoice non deductible tax amount vs Purchase order

    In the purchase order the tax amount is calculated item by item (ME21N). In the invoice (MIRO) when we select flag “Calculate tax” the system calculates the tax amount for the total of all the items. Because of this system behaviour in the invoice verification sometimes we obtain small differences.
    These differences should not exist specially when we are using a non deductible tax that affects the material valuation with the goods receipt and has to be corrected in the moment of the invoice verification.
    Why does the system have a different behaviour from the purchase order to the invoice?
    What can be done?
    Best regards

    Dear Biju K
    Whatever you mentioned about condition NAVS is there in system.
    I am not adding tax code in PO, referring your earlier email I am asking that.
    For adding other element I have not asked anything here, only to clarify your statement
    You need to cross check why non-deductible tax amount needed in your PO with NAVS condition type and its purpose.
    I explained this.
    My question is simple that in one PO I am getting non-deductible tax but if I change vendor for the same material I am not getting non-deductible tax in condition tab ? I am not able to understand why its happened ? If one PO shows means there are chances that basic configuration is correct but may be somewhere something is wrong, I want to find out that.  If you can throw some light on that its helpful for me.
    regards
    Nitin

  • TDS TAX AMOUNT  IS NOT MACHING WITH INVOICE WTAX AMOUNTu2019

    Dear All,
    I am Facing Following Problem in TDS
    While creating an A/P Invoice after putting row level information when user click on u2018ADDu2019 button u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D opens for deduction of TDS amount. When user selects u201CWithholding Tax Codeu201D in u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D to deduct TDS amount for an invoice system shows WTax amount as per rate of deduction. But when user click on u2018OKu2019 to u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D window, WTax Amount will comes as zero on A/P Invoice window.
    Then when again user will go to u201CWithholding Tax Tableu201D and manually put the value of WTax Amount system reflects it on A/P Invoice window.
    In case when we set approval procedure to A/P Invoice, this invoice goes for an approval. After coming back as approved invoice when originator of invoice going to u2018ADDu2019 the same document system shows an error as u2018TDS TAX AMOUNT  IS NOT MACHING WITH INVOICE WTAX AMOUNTu2019
    please reply me ASAP
    Thanks & Regards,
    Swapnil

    hi
    try this
    We need to follow  the following steps
    u2022     Open the BP master for which TDS needs to be deducted go to the accounting tab followed by tax option and then  click on the checkbox subject to withholding tax
    u2022     Click on the option WTAX codes Allowed and select the TDS Category
    u2022     On the previous window click the check box pertaining the checkbox  u201CTDS OVERLOOKu201D
    Regards,
    Manish

  • PO - Status without non-deductable taxes

    Hi,
    my problem is, that in transaction code ME23N I see in the Status of the PO only the net price not the price with non-deductable taxes.
    Any Idea, why this is so.
    The conditions are OK, and the budget-reduce works with the whole sum.
    The status shows something else
    And the accounting people are little bit confused about it.
    Is it possible, that the status tab shows the whole sum (for example if we have freight, also with freight) ?
    Thanks Ralf

    Thanks,
    the schema wasn't well customized in English. Here the way it looks in German.
    Here you see, that the condition tab in the header has it's sums.
    The status tab is still shown the net price.
    What can I do more?
    Regards Ralf

  • Non deductable tax & deductable tax

    Dear ALL
    What are Non deductable tax & deductable tax?
    How system determines which is the deductable & non deductable tax?
    Regards
    SANTOSH KADAM.

    hii
    FO some material we will be availing the CENVAT credit , that is called CENVA deductible . like raw material ,consumable, capital item with excise duties .
    For Some cases , material will be excisable ,but we won't take CENVAT credit , this is called CENVAT non deductible.
    Like , spare parts,some other material..etc.
    IFu r using TAXINJ, maintain all the tax code conditions with Non deductible.
    So that system will automatically hit the materials account for Non deductible materials .
    Thanks

  • In fbl1n report for document type RE  withholding tax amount is not showing

    in fbl1n report for document type RE  withholding tax amount is not showing
    in sap note 363309 determines
    Solution
    Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information (field BSEG-QSSHB) from your display
    variant.
    If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on the document number and
    subsequently choose 'Withholding tax'.
    my doubt is we remove the field BSEG-QSSHB in layout how can show the withholding tax amount in FBLIN report
    how to remove from the layout
    please clarefy
    bhayyapu   

    Hi,
    If you want to check amounts of withholding tax for the vendors, you have some options to view it. You can access the WITH_ITEM, LFC1 tables by SE16. You have too the S_P00_07000134 report. This report is developed for the Colombia but I already used for the another country with the ABAP development for this country.
    Also you can use table join BSIK and WITH_ITEM by SQVI for the open items and BSAK and WITH_ITEM for cleared items. It is more simple and fast.
    JPA

  • Error in A/P invoice -non deduct tax a/c missing

    Dear All
    While adding A/P invoice from base GRPO where it contains frieght an error is displaying:non deduct tax account is missing for stock item.
    In frieght the stock option and distribution method is none only,but A/P invoice getting added with out frieght this is issue is coming only when freight is given.
    Please provide the solution
    Regards
    M Auditya

    Hi,
    Change your distribution method from NONE to Quantity option to post the document.
    Check the below threads
    Non Deduct Tax Account is Missing for Stock Item [Message 439-125]
    Re: Error:Non deduct tax acount missing in stock item
    Senthil Maruthappan.
    Team work Never Fails

  • Error Message FF747  -The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

    Hello,
    We are attempting to post an import vendor invoice through transaction    FB60 for Israel company code . Since the tax charged by the vendor is not fixed every time , we are entering the tax amount in the    FB60 screen manually , without selecting 'calculate tax'.The amount of tax is greater than the amount of expense as per the real business scenario. For example amount of expense is 100, amount of tax is 200 and the total amount charged by the vendor is 300 .However when we simulate the posting we get an error - The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base-Message no. FF747
    We tried putting a very high percentage in the tax code also but it didn't help
    We would like to go ahead with this posting. Could you pl throw light on the same . ? Is there any way (OSS note ) or a work around which can resolve the issue ?
    Best Regards
    Amit  Kulkarni

    Hello
    This may be  a work around in other cases , but since we want the amount to be updated in the BSET table for further VAT reports , we would like  this to be posted along with the expense item

  • FBL1( VENDOR LEDGER REPORT)-  Withholding tax amount is not coming .

    in FBL1 ( vENDOR lEDGER rEPORT) - WITHHOLDING TAX AMOUNT IS NOT CMING IN COLUMN  QBSHB OF FBL1.
    Purchasing document number is not coming also.
    How these fields may appear in the above said report. Is any config missing ?
    Thanks in advance
    M K Agarwal
    9967029930

    TDS posted from MIRO will not reflect in line item report, i have taken opinion from SAP for the same issue few days back, SAP has given the following opinion.
    *With reference to the difference in behaviour as compared to the document posted for example from MIRO which is an MM transaction and FB60 which is a FI transaction please note the following:
    The withholding tax amount that you are using i.e. Field BSEG-QBSHB is designed to fill for the classic withholding tax. And extended withholding tax information is stored exclusive in table WITH_ITEM.
    Also note that MIRO does not give the user the control in case of Classical withholding tax. It only supports Extended withholding tax. Hence it does not populate BSEG fields in case of Extended WT.
    So in MIRO, the data for extended withholding tax are saved within the table WITH_ITEM and not within the table entry BSEG-QBSHB. The latter isnot updated during the procedure. Furthermore it is not possible to select data from table WITH_ITEM
    within the transaction FBL1N in a transparent and unique way, as FBL1N only reads BSEG / BSIK / BSAK tables.
    In your line layout,you define a field BSEG-QBSHB. But actually the field of vendor/customer line item is filled with zero from FI. Thus,it shows zero in line item display*
    Please review note 363309 for detailed explanation and explains the functionality which is valid even for your release.
    So it is not possible to display withholding tax information in the line item display transactions, since this information is not
    held in the BSEG / BSIK / BSAK tables, but is instead stored in the WITH_ITEM table.
    Please convey to your client, standard SAP will not show the TDS information in line item reports, documents posted from MIRO and refer  the note 363309.

  • Item's withholding tax amount is not zero

    Dear All,
    When ever we clear the vendor account through f.13 system was showing the below mentioned message.
    S No customer documents selected
    S No G/L account documents selected
    I Only accounts with debit and credit postings are included
    X Item's withholding tax amount is not zero 0101 K 319936 13000031 105352237 1
    X Item's withholding tax amount is not zero 0101 K 319936 13000031 105352237 2
    I Stop date " 02.01.2010 Stop time " 17:00:00
    Client is asking no need to show Items withholding tax amount is not zero message.
    Where as the clearing criteria is business place .
    Regards,
    Teja

    Hi,
    please refer to the note 499902 and 442588 for the explanation why the transaction F.13 has given out
    this error and which transactions (FBZ2 or F-53) should be used to clear the items with the withholding tax info maintained.
    Reg
    Madhu M

  • Tax Amount is not updated into BSEG

    Dear All,
    I have recently added a tax amount field MWSTS from table BSEG into FBL1N - Vendor Line Item Display. To my surprise the input tax amount is not updated into BSEG table. The input tax is normally posted using either MIRO or FB60.
    Any one has the same problem? Can please kindly share how to fix the problem?
    Thanks in advance for your kind assisstance.
    rgds,
    Dahlia

    Thanks Andreas,
    However I do believe that it should be updated into BSEG - MWSTS as we have mutliple companies in different countries in the system. All the other companies have the input rate updated into BSEG - MWSTS for the vendor line item, only the company for India is not updated.
    Yes, BSET do have the tax amount updated but I can't use BSET table in FBL1N. I need to provide the tax amount information for each vendor line item in FBL1N.
    thks
    Dahlia

  • The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

    Hi Experts,
    User is trying to "Relase to Account" in t-code VF01 he is getting an error message The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base.
    During Debuging i found the error is raised in Function module      RV_ACCOUNTING_DOCUMENT_CREATE
    Message raised is
    Message Class : FF
    Message number: 747
    Mesage "The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base"
    Request to through some lights on this issue.
    Reagrds
    Sree

    Hi,
    did you check SAPNET notes with "VF01" and the message class/number as search terms. There are some notes dealing with this case eg 872449, and 184985.
    Best regards, Christian

  • Tax amount is not appearing in consumption history of earmarked fund

    Dear Experts,
    It is a requirement from my customer, the tax item be populated with the same earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund of the related expense or revenue item.
    The transaction OBBH and the exit presented in attachment was used to try to achieve that requirement.
    The accounting document was correctly created with the tax item correctly populated with the earmarked fund, commitment item, functional area, funds center and fund from the related expense item.
    The funds management document was also  correctly created including the tax item with the correct commitment item, fund, funds center and functional area.
    The problem detected is related with the missing tax value in consumption history of the earmarked fund. The value of the tax item is not appearing in records of tables KBLP and FMIOI.
    Could you please help me with this problem?
    Kind Regards,
    Rui Neves

    Hi,
    Thanks for your answer.  We are reimplementing the REFX solution for a company.  The existing system is also in ECC6.  For  contracts made in existing system when periodic posting done, tax is shown against both contract and rental object.  The value of periodic posting is same for both contract and rental object.
    However, in the new implementation, tax amount is not appearing against rental rental object.  Tax amount is appearing against rental contract.  As a result, there is a difference in amount.  Is this correct as a process ?
    Regards,
    T Saravanan

  • Invoice tax amount is not equal to the calculated tax amount

    Hi All,
    I'm importing AP invoices through Open Interface R12.
    Lines includes Tax lines as well. But Invoices become held when I try to validate.
    I'm getting this hold reason: "Invoice tax amount is not equal to the calculated tax amount"
    Can anybody advise please ?
    Thanks,

    Use T. code SM30 and give table name J_1IT030K_V and click on maintain button give your chart of account, press enter here assign appropriate G/L A/C against Tax code MK.

  • FF747 Tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

    We have sample orders where the order amount is calculated and then discounted fully.  However, our freight goes to our tax software separately due to different taxability rules.  Therefore, the original tax amount (pre-discount) is sent and we end up with FF 747: The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base.
    The business wants to track this freight amount.  How do we change the message from error to warning or does anyone have a work around so we can invoice these customers?
    Thanks,
    Michelle

    Hello ,
    I am facing the same issue. Could you please let me know how you resolved it ?
    Thanks.

Maybe you are looking for