NoOfRec in PSA greater than NoOfRec in RSA3

Hi,
I was trying to extract data from Masterdatasources in MM.
FOr this datasource,0DCINDIC_TEXT,I triggered a IP.
Theres is a mismatch in noof Records between PSA and RSA3.
In RSA3 I have 2 records.PSA I got 4 records.
RSA3:
Key     LA    Desc
H       EN      Credit
S       EN      Debit
PSA:
Key     LA    Desc
H       DE      Credit
S      DE      Debit
H       EN      Credit
S       EN      Debit
NoOfRecords in RSA3 is less than NoOfRecords in PSA.
I couldnt find these DE records in RSA3.Why is it like this?
Awaiting your reply....

Hi Bharath,
The Data source is the Debit or credit indicator, it will be generally have 2 records which will differentiate the records as debit or credit and based on that the result of valuated stock is calculated.
Its fine to have 4 records these are different languages, if you want you can have a filter at DTP and load only EN.
Thanks,
Rakesh.

Similar Messages

Text Remarks ofLength greater than 60

Hi Everyone,
I have a requirement where I need to pull a field called Remarks from ECC System and it is a Long Text. As , it is , Long Text will not be stored in a Table. So , there is a R/3 Function Module using which we can get the data for Remarks.
This Remarks is for SO ITEM.
Now, i plan to somehow build a Genric Extractor for this Remarks and get into BI.
But BI InfoObject has only 60 as the maximum length. So how is this going to be possible.
Can anyone throw some Light on Extracting Long Tests from ECC as well as The Modeling Part. I am new to this scenario.
Regards,
Samir

Hi Samir,
As this field Remark is for SO Item, for the extraction part you can explore the option for enhancing the Standard LO extractor , for the new field. in the CMOD code you can call the function module and populate the field.
For the length greater than 60 issue. The DS and PSA will allow you to store value for records greater than 60. will storing in the data target you will have to split the field in the different infoobject of length 60 each. You'll have to get a confirmation on the maximum length so as to anticipate the number of infoobjects required. Spliititng will be done at the transformation level. using simple ABAP code of string operation 0(60) & 61(60).
For display in report their are option avaiable in BSP code. Please check the Article below for more details:
http://www.bi-expertonline.com/article.cfm?id=2132
Hope this helps.
regards,
Umesh.
Edited by: Umesh.Chavan on Apr 20, 2010 12:44 PM

A caller 01, 02 or equal to or greater than 20 contains an error meesage.

Error message during processing in BI
Diagnosis
An error occurred in BI while processing the data. The error is documented in an error message.
System Response
A caller 01, 02 or equal to or greater than 20 contains an error meesage.
Further analysis:
The error message(s) was (were) sent by:
Update
Update
Update
Procedure
Check the error message (pushbutton below the text).
Select the message in the message dialog box, and look at the long text for further information.
Follow the instructions in the message.
Hi Experts,
My master data load is getting failed often.
I have some special characters, space, caps, lower caps etcs in my data and thos it fails.
I tried including ALL_CAPITAL sometime and also ALL_CAPITAL_PLUS_HEX
I also crossed check at SE16 > RSALLOWEDCHAR everything seems to be fine but still i get this error.
Please help me to some solution.
Thanks

You can edit them in PSA for the moment and upload
ALL_CAPITAL - May not handle all the spl char
If the problem is very often I would suggest to check the blogs in forum on this topic
/people/sap.user72/blog/2006/07/08/invalid-characters-in-sap-bw-3x-myths-and-reality-part-1
/people/sap.user72/blog/2006/07/23/invalid-characters-in-sap-bw-3x-myths-and-reality-part-2
Edited by: Srinivas on Sep 14, 2010 12:39 PM

Query to select values greater than, where AS clause is used

Oracle 10g
Requesting your help in writing the query correctly.
I have the following 2 tables. The AddProjectPhase and AddProject tables. It is many to many relationship. Each project can have a predefined set of 4 different phases under it. Each phase has a start date and an end date. I am writing a report to get the phases which have a duration greater than, for example, 3 months.
The query below is working fine to just display the list of all the phases along with the duration of each phase. I am not able to modify it to select the phases which have a duration, for example, 3 or more months.
CREATE TABLE "ADDPROJECT"
   (     "VERSIONNO" NUMBER(*,0),
     "PROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJNAME" VARCHAR2(60),
     "PROJSTARTDATE" DATE,
     "PROJSTATUS" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJENDDATE" DATE,
     "PROJENDTYPE" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJENDREASON" VARCHAR2(1000),
     "UCPROJECTMANAGER" VARCHAR2(20),
     "FROMDATE" DATE,
     "TODATE" DATE,
     "SRCHFIELD" VARCHAR2(20),
     "OPERATOR" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PARENTPROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJHIDDENDATE" VARCHAR2(20),
      CONSTRAINT "PK_B36" PRIMARY KEY ("PROJID", "PROJHIDDENDATE") ENABLE
CREATE TABLE "ADDPROJECTPHASE"
   (     "VERSIONNO" NUMBER(*,0),
     "PROJPHASEID" NUMBER(9,0),
     "PHASESTARTDATE" DATE,
     "PHASEENDDATE" DATE,
     "RRDATE" DATE,
     "PHASENAME" VARCHAR2(30),
     "PROJPHASESTATUS" VARCHAR2(20),
     "PROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
     "OPERATOR" VARCHAR2(20),
     "FROMDATE" DATE,
     "TODATE" DATE,
     "SRCHFIELD" VARCHAR2(20),
     "REVIEWCOMMENTS" VARCHAR2(1000),
     "PROJHIDDENDATE" VARCHAR2(20),
     "ISUEVALUATION" NUMBER(1,0),
     "SOLUTIONINGTEAMINVOLVEMENT" NUMBER(1,0),
     "ISUNAME" VARCHAR2(20),
      CONSTRAINT "PK_A63" PRIMARY KEY ("PROJPHASEID") ENABLE
   )Below is the query to display the list of all the phases along with the duration of each phase which is working fine.
SELECT pp.phaseName "phasename",
pp.phaseStartDate "phaseStartDate",
pp.phaseEndDate "phaseEndDate",
pp.projPhaseStatus "projPhaseStatus",
ap.projID "projID",
ap.projName "projName",
ap.projHiddenDate "projHiddenDate",
ap.projStartDate "projStartDate",
CASE
    WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL
    THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
    WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL
    THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
    ELSE null
END "phaseMonths"
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
ORDER BY ap.projIDHowever the modified query shown below to select all the phases greater than, for example, 3 months, is resulting in
ORA-00904: "PHASEMONTHS": invalid identifier SELECT pp.phaseName, pp.phaseStartDate, pp.phaseEndDate
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
AND PhaseMonths IN
(SELECT
(CASE
WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL
THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL
THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
ELSE null
END) AS PhaseMonths
FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate)
ORDER BY ap.projID

Looking for this?
select *
   from (
        SELECT pp.phaseName "phasename"
          , pp.phaseStartDate "phaseStartDate"
          , pp.phaseEndDate "phaseEndDate"
          , pp.projPhaseStatus "projPhaseStatus"
          , ap.projID "projID"
          , ap.projName "projName"
          , ap.projHiddenDate "projHiddenDate"
          , ap.projStartDate "projStartDate"
          , CASE WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
                 WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL     THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
                 ELSE null
            END "phaseMonths"
          FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
         WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
           AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
         ORDER
            BY ap.projID
where "phaseMonths" >= 3

How to use (greater than) in web services call

Hello, I am trying to query a set of assets where the external unique ID is greater than 400,000. My existing code looks like
qryIn.ListOfAsset(0).ExternalSystemId = ">'400000'"
However, using this will return any asset record starting with a 5 or above as far as I can tell, I assume b/c it is comparing string data due to the single quotes infering data of type text (string). Is it possible to use comparison operators with numeric data correctly?
I posed this question to support and received the below answer:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?> <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <soap:Body> <AssetWS_AssetQueryPage_Input xmlns="urn:crmondemand/ws/asset/"> <ListOfAsset xmlns="urn:/crmondemand/xml/asset"> <Asset> <AssetId /> <PurchaseDate/> <OwnerAccountId /> <ExternalSystemId>> '400000'</ExternalSystemId> </Asset> </ListOfAsset> </AssetWS_AssetQueryPage_Input> </soap:Body> </soap:Envelope>
Basically, instructing me to use &gt. I'm doing coding in .NET visual studio and not using the XML as above. However, I did try the following:
qryIn.ListOfAsset(0).ExternalSystemId = ">'400000'" which returned an error in the compiler.
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

Thanks for the reply. I would assume "external system id" is an integer, but, I will test on a custom field that I now is of type integer.
Could you take your same code and use a non-zero value for the operand? For example, could you try
objAccQryParam.ListOfAccount[0].CustomInteger0 = ">= '10'"; and let me know if that returns values that are greater than or equal to 10. Using a two digit number is important. Assuming you have data greater than 10.
Thanks!

Exchange 2010 SP2 RU2 - Indexing backlog reached a critical limit of 48 hours or the number of items in the retry queue is greater than 10000 for one or more databases

We have been getting intermittent SCOM alarms for our Exchange 2010 MBX server citing "Indexing backlog reached a critical limit of 48 hours or the number of items in the retry queue is greater than 10000 for one or more databases"
I see events in EventViewer that SCOM is triggering on, but not whats generating the events or how else to test for them.
    get-eventlog -computername SERVERNAME -logname "Application" -after "03/14/2013" | ?{$_.eventid -eq "5604"} | select MachineName,EventID,EntryType,Message | ft -autosize
One MS Forum post online says it is a bug in RU4, unclear if it may also be a bug in RU2 (our installed version).
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchangesvradmin/thread/9dcb3011-9327-4935-9479-62b38a6ddd87
    "I was looking for the same error and found this.. it basically says that this is a bug in RU4 and RU4-v2...and it needs to be removed."
tests using troubleshooting scripts find no issues with search indexer,
    [PS] C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\scripts>.\Troubleshoot-CI.ps1
    Get-EventLog : No matches found
    At C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\scripts\CITSLibrary.ps1:622 char:40
    + $msftesqlCrashes = get-eventlog <<<< -computername $Server -after $StartTime -logname "Application" -source $msftesqlServiceName | where {$_.eventId
    -eq $msftesqlCrashEventId}
        + CategoryInfo : ObjectNotFound: (:) [Get-EventLog], ArgumentException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : GetEventLogNoEntriesFound,Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.GetEventLogCommand
    Name IsDeadLocked CatalogStatusArray
    SERVERNAME False {DATABASENAME\SERVERNAME, DATABASENAME\S...
    [PS] C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\scripts>
and tests against searches on each DB themselves show no issues and respond typically within 3 seconds.
    [PS] C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\scripts>Test-ExchangeSearch | ft Server, Database, ServerGuid, ResultFound, SearchTimeInSeconds, Error -AutoSize
    Server Database ServerGuid ResultFound SearchTimeInSeconds Error
    SERVERNAME DATABASENAME b16e3461-257c-40dd-a9ad-99a5f41a927e True 2.937
I also tried to check the Performance Viewer for the MSExchange Search Indexer and MXExchange Search Indices but am unsure which of the many metrics would indicate this issue.
We have had no reports of search issues from our users and have been unable to duplicate any impairment in our testing.
Does anyone else have any suggestions for tests to check or steps to take on this alert? Is it simply a false alarm or a timeout of other sorts during testing? We have 80 DAGs on this server (as well as all our servers, some of which have also reported the
same alert) and the Test-ExchangeSearch command times out before completely testing all DAGs.

Hi IAMChrisL,
Any updates?
Frank Wang
TechNet Community Support

Unit Testing - Results greater than 0

I am unit testing a PL/SQL function. The function has no inputs and one output (Interval Day to Second) . The output is the time it takes to run a query therefore a valid value for the output would be greater than 0.
When I setup the test the result only takes a Interval Day to Second value. I want to be able to say any result greater than 0 is a success.
How can I do this?
tom

I am unit testing a PL/SQL function. The function has no inputs and one output (Interval Day to Second) . The output is the time it takes to run a query therefore a valid value for the output would be greater than 0.
When I setup the test the result only takes a Interval Day to Second value. I want to be able to say any result greater than 0 is a success.
How can I do this?
tom

FileUpload using JAX-WS webservice on weblogic 10.3.5 is taking long time for files greater than 10MB

I am trying to upload a file using JAX-WS webservice which is deployed on the weblogic 10.3.5 server.Even before the code reaches the Service Endpoint lot of time is being spent at the weblogic layer. for files less than 10MB the performance is good but for files greater than 10 MB it takes around 3 mins to complete the request. I did take thread dumps and I see the thread servicing the requests is taking lot of time when executing SAX2DOMEx.characters it consumes around 80 -85 % of time here. Is there anything that I can do to improve the performance here ?
"[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'" id=37 idx=0x90 tid=16848 prio=5 alive, suspended, native_blocked, daemon
                at jrockit/vm/Allocator.allocLargeObjectOrArray(JIZ)Ljava/lang/Object;(Native Method)
                at jrockit/vm/Allocator.allocObjectOrArray(Allocator.java:349)[optimized]
                at jrockit/vm/StringMaker.toString(StringMaker.java:188)[inlined]
                at com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/CharacterDataImpl.appendData(CharacterDataImpl.java:191)[optimized]
                at com/sun/xml/bind/marshaller/SAX2DOMEx.characters(SAX2DOMEx.java:218)[inlined]
                at com/sun/xml/bind/marshaller/SAX2DOMEx.characters(SAX2DOMEx.java:209)[optimized]
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/SAX2DOMWriterEx.writeCharacters( .java:108)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/util/xml/XMLStreamReaderToXMLStreamWriter.handleCharacters(XMLStreamReaderToXMLStreamWriter.java:153)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/util/xml/XMLStreamReaderToXMLStreamWriter.bridge(XMLStreamReaderToXMLStreamWriter.java:114)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/stream/StreamMessage.writePayloadTo(StreamMessage.java:313)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/stream/StreamMessage.writeEnvelope(StreamMessage.java:343)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/stream/StreamMessage.writeTo(StreamMessage.java:321)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/AbstractMessageImpl.readAsSOAPMessage(AbstractMessageImpl.java:226)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/handler/SOAPMessageContextImpl.getMessage(SOAPMessageContextImpl.java:87)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/framework/jaxrpc/SOAPMessageContext.getMessage(SOAPMessageContext.java:252)
                at weblogic/wsee/security/wssp/handlers/WssHandler.getSecurityContext(WssHandler.java:318)
                at weblogic/wsee/security/wssp/handlers/WssHandler.preValidate(WssHandler.java:420)
                at weblogic/wsee/security/wssp/handlers/PreWssServerPolicyHandler.processRequest(PreWssServerPolicyHandler.java:25)
                at weblogic/wsee/security/wssp/handlers/WssHandler.handleRequest(WssHandler.java:112)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/framework/jaxrpc/TubeFactory$JAXRPCTube.processRequest(TubeFactory.java:222)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber.__doRun(Fiber.java:866)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber._doRun(Fiber.java:815)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber.doRun(Fiber.java:778)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber.runSync(Fiber.java:680)
                ^-- Holding lock: com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber@0x83736a70[biased lock]
                at com/sun/xml/ws/server/WSEndpointImpl$2.process(WSEndpointImpl.java:403)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/transport/http/HttpAdapter$HttpToolkit.handle(HttpAdapter.java:532)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/transport/http/HttpAdapter.handle(HttpAdapter.java:253)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/transport/http/servlet/ServletAdapter.handle(ServletAdapter.java:140)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/WLSServletAdapter.handle(WLSServletAdapter.java:171)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/HttpServletAdapter$AuthorizedInvoke.run(HttpServletAdapter.java:708)
                at weblogic/security/acl/internal/AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
                at weblogic/security/service/SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:146)
                at weblogic/wsee/util/ServerSecurityHelper.authenticatedInvoke(ServerSecurityHelper.java:103)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/HttpServletAdapter$3.run(HttpServletAdapter.java:311)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/HttpServletAdapter.post(HttpServletAdapter.java:336)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/VerboseHttpProcessor.post(VerboseHttpProcessor.java:39)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/JAXWSServlet.doRequest(JAXWSServlet.java:98)
                at weblogic/servlet/http/AbstractAsyncServlet.service(AbstractAsyncServlet.java:99)
                at javax/servlet/http/HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:300)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:183)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.wrapRun(Lweblogic/servlet/internal/ServletStubImpl;Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletRequest;Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletResponse;)Ljava/lang/Object;(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run()Ljava/lang/Object;(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/security/acl/internal/AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
                at weblogic/security/service/SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:120)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletRequest;Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletResponse;Z)V(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/WebAppServletContext.execute(Lweblogic/servlet/internal/ServletRequestImpl;Lweblogic/servlet/internal/ServletResponseImpl;)V(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/ServletRequestImpl.run()V(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/work/ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
                at weblogic/work/ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
                at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)

I am trying to upload a file using JAX-WS webservice which is deployed on the weblogic 10.3.5 server.Even before the code reaches the Service Endpoint lot of time is being spent at the weblogic layer. for files less than 10MB the performance is good but for files greater than 10 MB it takes around 3 mins to complete the request. I did take thread dumps and I see the thread servicing the requests is taking lot of time when executing SAX2DOMEx.characters it consumes around 80 -85 % of time here. Is there anything that I can do to improve the performance here ?
"[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'" id=37 idx=0x90 tid=16848 prio=5 alive, suspended, native_blocked, daemon
                at jrockit/vm/Allocator.allocLargeObjectOrArray(JIZ)Ljava/lang/Object;(Native Method)
                at jrockit/vm/Allocator.allocObjectOrArray(Allocator.java:349)[optimized]
                at jrockit/vm/StringMaker.toString(StringMaker.java:188)[inlined]
                at com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/CharacterDataImpl.appendData(CharacterDataImpl.java:191)[optimized]
                at com/sun/xml/bind/marshaller/SAX2DOMEx.characters(SAX2DOMEx.java:218)[inlined]
                at com/sun/xml/bind/marshaller/SAX2DOMEx.characters(SAX2DOMEx.java:209)[optimized]
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/SAX2DOMWriterEx.writeCharacters( .java:108)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/util/xml/XMLStreamReaderToXMLStreamWriter.handleCharacters(XMLStreamReaderToXMLStreamWriter.java:153)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/util/xml/XMLStreamReaderToXMLStreamWriter.bridge(XMLStreamReaderToXMLStreamWriter.java:114)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/stream/StreamMessage.writePayloadTo(StreamMessage.java:313)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/stream/StreamMessage.writeEnvelope(StreamMessage.java:343)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/stream/StreamMessage.writeTo(StreamMessage.java:321)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/message/AbstractMessageImpl.readAsSOAPMessage(AbstractMessageImpl.java:226)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/handler/SOAPMessageContextImpl.getMessage(SOAPMessageContextImpl.java:87)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/framework/jaxrpc/SOAPMessageContext.getMessage(SOAPMessageContext.java:252)
                at weblogic/wsee/security/wssp/handlers/WssHandler.getSecurityContext(WssHandler.java:318)
                at weblogic/wsee/security/wssp/handlers/WssHandler.preValidate(WssHandler.java:420)
                at weblogic/wsee/security/wssp/handlers/PreWssServerPolicyHandler.processRequest(PreWssServerPolicyHandler.java:25)
                at weblogic/wsee/security/wssp/handlers/WssHandler.handleRequest(WssHandler.java:112)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/framework/jaxrpc/TubeFactory$JAXRPCTube.processRequest(TubeFactory.java:222)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber.__doRun(Fiber.java:866)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber._doRun(Fiber.java:815)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber.doRun(Fiber.java:778)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber.runSync(Fiber.java:680)
                ^-- Holding lock: com/sun/xml/ws/api/pipe/Fiber@0x83736a70[biased lock]
                at com/sun/xml/ws/server/WSEndpointImpl$2.process(WSEndpointImpl.java:403)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/transport/http/HttpAdapter$HttpToolkit.handle(HttpAdapter.java:532)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/transport/http/HttpAdapter.handle(HttpAdapter.java:253)
                at com/sun/xml/ws/transport/http/servlet/ServletAdapter.handle(ServletAdapter.java:140)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/WLSServletAdapter.handle(WLSServletAdapter.java:171)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/HttpServletAdapter$AuthorizedInvoke.run(HttpServletAdapter.java:708)
                at weblogic/security/acl/internal/AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
                at weblogic/security/service/SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:146)
                at weblogic/wsee/util/ServerSecurityHelper.authenticatedInvoke(ServerSecurityHelper.java:103)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/HttpServletAdapter$3.run(HttpServletAdapter.java:311)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/HttpServletAdapter.post(HttpServletAdapter.java:336)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/VerboseHttpProcessor.post(VerboseHttpProcessor.java:39)
                at weblogic/wsee/jaxws/JAXWSServlet.doRequest(JAXWSServlet.java:98)
                at weblogic/servlet/http/AbstractAsyncServlet.service(AbstractAsyncServlet.java:99)
                at javax/servlet/http/HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:300)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:183)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.wrapRun(Lweblogic/servlet/internal/ServletStubImpl;Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletRequest;Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletResponse;)Ljava/lang/Object;(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run()Ljava/lang/Object;(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/security/acl/internal/AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
                at weblogic/security/service/SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:120)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletRequest;Ljavax/servlet/http/HttpServletResponse;Z)V(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/WebAppServletContext.execute(Lweblogic/servlet/internal/ServletRequestImpl;Lweblogic/servlet/internal/ServletResponseImpl;)V(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/servlet/internal/ServletRequestImpl.run()V(Unknown Source)
                at weblogic/work/ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
                at weblogic/work/ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:178)
                at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)

How to set-up Payment terms greater than 10 years

We have payment terms that go beyond 10 years. In the configuration of the payment terms, the "Additional months" field (V_T052-ZMONA) only contains 2 characters. 10 years * 12 months = 120 months which is already 3 characters long.
Anybody know a way of how to set-up payment terms which is greater than 10 years? Any user exits?
Appreciate any help!
DGE
Edited by: DGE on Jan 3, 2008 5:43 AM

Hi Amlan Sarkar,
I went through IMG: Financial Accounting (New)> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable> Business Transactions> Outgoing Invoices/Credit Memos> Maintain Terms of Payment.
Now for me to configure Payment terms up to year 2018 (for example); i need to enter in field "Additional months" value = 120. 120 is 10 years * 12 months, since receivables for the year 2018 is 120 months from the current date.
How the "Additional months" field is only 2 characters long. Therefore I am unable to enter the value 120 which is 3 characters long.
Any ideas on how I can configure this?
Thank you.

Storage bin Capacity utilization is greater than 100%

Hi,
Via LS03N, I can found that some capacity utilization is greater than 100%, this must be incorrect, what's the reason? is there any report to update the capacity utilization for storage bin?
Kindly please advise.
Thanks

For the capacity checks, the remaining capacities or the used weight in the storage bin master data are updated with every putaway or picking. If you change the inspection method in the current operations or you change capacity or weight data of materials or storage unit types, you then need to make a comparison of the data. You can make this comparison with report RLS10200. First read the documentation before you start the report.

Passing variable of size greater than 32767 from Pro*C to PL/SQL procedure

Hi,
I am trying to pass a variable os size greater than 32767 from Pro*C to an SQL procedure.I tried assigning the host variable directly to a CLOB in the SQL section but nothing happens.In the below code the size of l_var1 is 33000.PROC_DATA is a procedure that takes CLOB as input and gives the other three(Data,Err_Code,Err_Msg) as output.These variables are declared globally.
Process_Data(char* l_var1)
EXEC SQL EXECUTE
DECLARE
l_clob clob;
BEGIN
l_clob := :l_var1
PROC_DATA(l_clob,:Data,:Err_Code,:Err_Msg) ;
COMMIT;
END;
END-EXEC;
I also tried using DBMS_LOB.This was the code that i used.
Process_Data(char* l_var1)
EXEC SQL EXECUTE
DECLARE
l_clob clob;
BEGIN
DBMS_LOB.CREATETEMPORARY(l_clob,TRUE);
DBMS_LOB.OPEN(l_clob,dbms_lob.lob_readwrite);
DBMS_LOB.WRITE (l_clob, LENGTH (:l_var1), 1,:l_var1);
PROC_DATA(l_clob,:Data,:Err_Code,:Err_Msg) ;
COMMIT;
END;
END-EXEC;
Here since DBMS_LOB packages allow a maximum of 32767,the value of l_var1 is not being assigned to l_clob.
I am able to do the above process provided i split l_var1 into two variables and then append to l_clob using WRITEAPPEND.i.e l_var1 is 32000 in length and l_var2 contains the rest.
Process_Data(char* l_var1,char* l_var2)
EXEC SQL EXECUTE
DECLARE
l_clob clob;
BEGIN
dbms_lob.createtemporary(l_clob,TRUE);
dbms_lob.OPEN(l_clob,dbms_lob.lob_readwrite);
DBMS_LOB.WRITE (l_clob, LENGTH (:l_var1), 1,:l_var1);
DBMS_LOB.WRITEAPPEND (l_clob, LENGTH(:l_var2), :l_var2);
PROC_DATA(l_clob,:Data,:Err_Code,:Err_Msg) ;
COMMIT;
END;
END-EXEC;
But the above code requires dynamic memory allocation in Pro*C which i would like to avoid.Could you let me know if there is any other way to perform the above?

Hi,
The Long Datatype has been deprecated use Clob or Blob. This will solve lot of problems inherent with the datatype.
Regards,
Ganesh R

Auto adjustment of page orientation causes printing issues with documents that have a page width greater than its page height.

Hi,
Since an upgrade from Word 2003 to Word 2010, we are experiencing printing issues with certain
documents that have a page width greater than its page height.
In Word 2003, it was no problem to set the page width greater than the page height while setting the page orientation to "portrait".
In Word 2010, this seems impossible: despite leaving the page orientation to "portrait", if one changes the page width/height as stated,
Word 2010 automatically adjusts the orientation to "landscape". Resetting the orientation to "portrait" will flip the page's width/heigth settings.
This behaviour causes printing problems: the page prints out 90° rotated.
I do not believe this is a printer driver issue: I tried several different printer drivers, and all give the same (bad) result. Setting the printer driver's page orientation settings (before printing) makes no difference, as
Word 2010 seems to force the page orientation settings.
Inserting the documents 90° rotated is not an option, since it causes problems with the printing margins.
This is very annoying, since we have to print official documents of a municipality (driver's licences).
Is there a workaround for this issue?
Regards,
Laurent Grandgaignage
Sysadmin Gemeentebestuur Stabroek, Belgium

Hi
Thank you for using
Microsoft Office for IT Professionals Forums.
From your description, we can follow these steps to test this issue
Step 1: Repair Office 2010
1.
Click
Start, and then click Control Panel.
2.
Click
Programs and Features.
3.
Click the
Office 2010 program that you want to repair, and then click
Change.
4.
Click
Repair, and then click Continue. You might need to restart your computer after the repair is complete.
Step 2:
Rename the global template (Normal.dotm)Follow the steps for the operating system that you are using:
Windows Vista and Windows 7
a)
Exit Word 2010
b)
Click
Start.
c)
In the
Start Search box, type the following text, and then press
ENTER:
1.
%userprofile%\appdata\roaming\microsoft\templates
d)
Right-click
Normal.dotm, and then click Rename.
e)
Type
Oldword.old, and then press ENTER.
Microsoft Windows XP
a)
Exit Word 2010
b)
Click
Start, and then click Run.
c)
In the
Open box, type the following text, and then press ENTER:
%userprofile%\Application Data\Microsoft\Templates
d)
Right-click
Normal.dotm, and then click Rename.
e)
Type
Oldword.old, and then press ENTER.
f)
Close Windows Explorer.
How to troubleshoot print failures in Word 2010, Word 2007, and Word 2003
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/826845
Please take your time to try the suggestions and let me know the results at your earliest convenience. If anything is unclear or if there is anything
I can do for you, please feel free to let me know.
Hope that helps.
Sincerely
William Zhou CHNPlease remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.

Schedule line getting confirmed when Ordered Quanity is greater than stock.

Hi Sap Gurus,
We have an issue in one of the sales scenario.
In one of the sales orders the ordered quanity is purposely maintained greater than the stock at respective storage location(batch managed).
In this case the schedule line should not get confirmed and it should not allow delivery document creation.
But in the sales order the schedule lines are geeting confirmed and even the delivery document is getting created with picking request completion.
Could you please help to understand :
1. why the schedule lines are getting confirmed when ordered quantity > Inventory?
2. How do I stop delivery document creaton in this scenario?
Looking for a quick response.
Thanks in advance,
Bhaskar

Hello Bhaskar,
Is Availability Check in your system considering Replenishment Lead time, if yes, then this is possible.
Check this IMG Link:
IMG - Sales and Distribution - Basic Functions - Availability Check and Transfer of Requirements - Availability Check with ATP Logic or Against Planning - Carry Out Control For Availability Check
Here check the RLT settings.
Also check settings under In/Outward Movements, where things like include Purchase Order can lead to confirmation of stock in Sales Order, despite physical inventory being present.
Hope this helps,
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

How to block Invoice when qty of Invoice is greater than PO Qty

Hi
We want to block the Invoice when Invoice qty is greater than PO qty.Is there any way to block the invoice ?

prashant shinde wrote:
Hi
>
> We want to block the Invoice when Invoice qty is greater than PO qty.Is there any way to block the invoice ?
Hi,
You can deal with this situation in 2 ways. Manually block the invoice while posting, TAB: Payment.
Else,
Use Quantity Variance Key: DQ,DW. You can enter tolerances for Lower and Upper Limit. You can enter absolute and percentage base variance. If one of the limit is exceeded the invoice is blocked for payment.
If you want certain variance is always blocked, set value or percentage for the upper limit to ZERO and select Check Limit.
IMG->Material Management->logistics Invoice Verification->Invoice Block->Set Tolerance Limits (Transaction Code: OMR6).
These setting are for Co. Code level.
Any deviation from ordered Quantity will be blocked.
Hope this is what you are looking for!!
Reetesh
Edited by: Reetesh on Nov 22, 2011 7:43 AM

HT1229 My iPhoto Library (version 8.1.2) is 280GB (greater than 50% of my 500GB total storage memory on my iMac. It was too large for me to drag it to a new hard drive so the Apple geniuses did it for me. However they did not delete the Library from my

My iPhoto Library (version 8.1.2) is 280GB (greater than 50% of my 500GB total storage memory on my iMac. It was too large for me to drag it to a new hard drive so the Apple geniuses did it for me. However they did not delete the Library from my iMac (that's my responsibility). I dragged it to Trash and when it started to move I clicked over to the new hard drive to confirm it had indeed been copied. I became nervous when I didn't see among the few files on this otherwise empty new hard drive anything that resembled a 280GB Library so I cancelled the migration to trash.
How can I be sure that my iphoto has been copied and that all my "metadata" survived in tact?

the new backup drive
I thought the new drive would be your data drive to host the iPhoto library. Do you also use it for TimeMachine backups?
I am unable to search either in email as well as Finder. I AM able to search within iPhoto though, thankfully
Spotlight may still be busy rebuildig its index.
You could try to rebuild the Spotlight Index, if you do see no progress:
Spotlight: How to re-index folders or volumes
I hope, other frequent posters will drop in. I have not used iPhoto 8.x in long time.

NoOfRec in PSA greater than NoOfRec in RSA3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for