Not able to Cif Safety stock.

Hi All
I am not able to cif the safety stock.I tried RIMODINI also.The parameters like lot size ,text etc I m able to cif.
But not safety stock.Can anyone help me in this.
R

Hi Roshan,
If your material is  in integration model then initial transfer of that model should transfer Safety Stock as well irrespective of whether an entry is maintained in BD52- CIFMAT or not.
Tell me one thing, is safety stock not getting transferred for all materials or for some materials?
if it is happening with all the materials then:
--> I think you need to check CIF logic, somewhere safety stock must be getting deleted, you may have to debug and find out.
I hope this will help.
Thanks,
Anupam

Similar Messages

  • Not able to CIF materials from R/3 system to APO

    Hi
    I am not able to CIF materials from R/3 to APO, Integration model is failing and it is giving me following error,
    '' Unkown reference product XXXX  for packaging in product YYYY"
    Basically looks like for above product YYYY there is reference packaging material  XXXX attached in  Material master data, Basic data view Tab1 in R/3, During CIF process it is giving error related to this reference packaging material,
    Can anyone help on this?
    Thanks and regards
    Nitin Lavhe

    Nitin,
    CIF across XXXX first, then YYYY.
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • Not Able to maintain the Stock

    Hi All,
    When i am using the MB1C Transaction code fro Maintaining the Stock then the error is occur "Fld seclectn for movt type 561/acct 799999 differs for Ext. GA amount in LC (023)"For that reason I am not able maintain the Stock.
    Can any one give the right solution?

    Hi,
    Go to t-code OMJJ >>> Select movement 561 >>> Double click on FIELD SELECTION(from 201) BATCH SEARCH PROCEDURE at left side
    Then again select movement type 561 >>> Details (Magnifying glass icon)
    Then double click on MATERIALS MANAGEMENT >>> Ext. GA amount in LC
    Either suppress this entry and save
    Then go for material posting
    Kapil

  • Not able to cif transiton data from APO to R/3 and from R/3 to APO

    Hi:
    I have made all relevant setting as per required for configuration of cif architecture in R/3 and in APO.I am able to cif master data from R/3 to APO but when I am transferring Planned Order from APO to R/3 or Sales Order from R/3 to APO I am not able to tranfer it .Even I am not getting any blocked q.
    Even I am able to access remote login to both system by RFC Connection.
    Please let me know how to debug it and solve it.
    With Regards
    Ashish Gupta

    Hi Ashish,
    Please try ciffing only one transactional data and then check on the application logs using t-code CFM1 or SLG1 in R/3 and /n/sapapo/c3 & slg1 in APO.  This will give you idea where is going on wrong.
    Kindly confirm
    Regards
    R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

  • MIGO it is not picking business area for stock account

    dear all
    here we created business area wise balance sheet and profit and loss account it is picking business area for all GL accounts excluding Stock account , while making goods receipt MIGO it is not picking business area, we assigned business area to plant and division. here is it possible to pick business area at the time of goods receipt. it is capturing  for all MM and SD entries here it is not able to capture for stock account.
    regards
    babu

    i make the fields optional in FSG for stock account and movement type  when i make MIGO when i select entries are automatically generates so it is not possible to capture business area, plese any one give me answer is it possible to capture business are at the time of MIGO
    regards
    babu

  • Safety stock caluculation

    Hi
    The issue is even though I have suffiecient stock still PRs are generating.I want to know why this PRs are generating.
    I suspect this is because of safety stock.I have maintained Safety Days' Supply 22,Safety Stock Method SM (Max.of Safety Stock and Safety Days'Sup.from Loc.Prod.Master).
    Please let me know how this safety stock caluculation works.
    R

    R,
    Rather than explain, let me just say that if it is your goal to have PRs never exceed requirements, then you should not maintain anything in Safety stock at all.  That is the whole purpose of Safety stock, to generate extra proposals to meet a particular business requirement.
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • Safety stock not covered by schedule lines in planning run

    Hi !
    In our organization we are trying to implement scheduling agreements and automatic creation of delivery schedule lines through MRP. We have MRP type PD and it considers the reservations created by PM orders and Production orders as requirement elements. When I do the planning run, it creates schedule lines for the PM order reservations and purchase requisition for safety stock. I need it to create schedule lines for all scenarios. Kindly help and suggest a solution.
    Regards,
    Satya

    Hi,
    Please refer the below links.
    Schedule Lines not getting created in MRP
    Re: No Scheduling line is generated when RUN MRP
    Hope it helps you.
    Thanks.

  • Inspection stock not able to move

    Hi
    For one material there is stock in Quality Inspection.I want to move stock to unrestricted use
    I am not able to see any Inspection lots in QA32.
    I tried using MIGO-movt type: 321 no use.
    All Inpection master data exists
    Please tell me How can i move stock from QI to unrestricted.
    Regards,
    Srihari.m

    HI
    where can i check for the particular Inspection lot partial stock is posted from QI to Unrestricted.?
    In QA 32 You can set the lay out to see  Posted stock and quality stock etc....
    How ever for partially posted lots status will be UD ICCO SPST STUP and not UD ICCO SPCO STUP
    I will analyze all movements happened using MB51 for the last one year at least for the movements 101,102,and 321 to find out the issue.
    One more thing, When u are carrying out 321 using MIGO what error you are getting. This may help further to know the cause.
    Nitin

  • CIF Exit for updating APO field SAFETY STOCK METHOD from R/3.

    Hi All,
    I have a requirement for updating filed "Safety stock Method " in APO from R/3.
    We can do it through transactions CFM1 and then CFM2 in R/3.
    This happens when we make changes in MM02 in R/3,
    for fields,
    In ECC, Goto MRP2 view in material master
    Safety stock (EISBE)
    Safety time/act cov. (SHZET)
    STime period profile (SHPRO)
    Currently, we are using a exit : Exit_saplcmat_001,
    but it only gets triggered when we make changes in safety stock and safety time.
    where as if we make changes only in STime period profile, and don't make any change in safety stock and safety time,
    in this case the exit is not triggered.
    Now, we are looking for an exit, which will get triggered even when there is no change in safety stock and safety time,
    where as there is change in STime period profile.
    Please suggest what can be used.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Rahul A

    Hi,
    You may need to include the field in some structure also.
    eg.  for sales order interface we add z fields to  structure /SAPAPO/KOMGO
    Thanks,
    Pavan Verma

  • Sales order stock not able to use for delivery

    Hi,
    I am facing a issue for special stock of material.
    During cut over activity some documents are created in system. One of them was a sales order and then stock was also uploaded for the sales order.
    In our business special stock was required and hence stock was uploaded using 561E.
    Now in between we had archived these material documents (561E). As an effect in MMBE we are able to see special stock for material but if we click on it no sales order number is displayed. The sales order is still active. At warehouse report that is MB52 sales order number is displayed.
    Now when we are trying to do delivery for this sales order system is giving error message that "sales order stock does not exists" M7 184.
    I am not able to do any type of movement with this stock.
    I tried to correct this stock inconsistency using transaction MB5K and there were no records.
    Please guide me how to get rid of this issue.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Adwait Bachuwar

    You can even archive material documents the day after its creation, there is no defined dependency.
    And your error is certainly not caused by an archived material document.
    I just wonder a bit why a sales order stock is lying for 2 years in your system, this is usually short term stock, goods issued very soon after its production, as it is specially produced for one sales order.
    I am not in a SAP system today as we have a public holiday to double check the values from your screen shots with my system.
    Right now I somehow feel that there is something wrong with the special stock number seen in your MB52 screenshot, there is a space between the / the the first zero
    Also I do not see any batch number and special stock number in MMBE screen
    Can you add a screenshot from your sales order, does it really have this number which is seen in the special stock field?

  • Issue with -ve safety stock not allowing items of smaller demand to be isue

    We have a material with  a safety stock value of 300 with only 119 available in inventory.  Looking at MD04 the available qty immediately goes negative (-181). We have requirement of 30 but was prevented by the system from ussing the material - no iventory available message.  The workaround, which is not acceptable, was to reduice the safety stock to zero, create the delivery and then re-instate the safety stock level back to 300.
    So the issue is that  material could not be issued to PrdOrds.  Is there a possibilty that we have some missing config / master data settings that are preventing the issuing of material when safety stock is factored in and available quantity is less than zero?

    From planning perspective, there are two options available for your scenario.
    You may try if the dynamic safety stock works for you. You may have to configure the minimum, maximum  and target stock levels. The system calculates the average daily requirements of the material and determines the proposals.
    If your business process demands only static ss, you can configure the % share of ss that can be used for smaller requirements. Check the config node Production >> MRP >> Planning >> MRP calculation >> Stocks >> Define SS availability. This way the smaller requirements would be considered for use from SS by planning. You will have to define the % share of SS that can be used by planning based on MRP groups.
    Edited by: Arun.CBE on Feb 17, 2012 9:25 AM

  • Safety Stock Not Being Released To Cover New Sales Orders Or Forecast

    Hi,
    Does anyone know of a way to get safety stock at the lower levels of the BOM to get released for upper level sales order or forecast demand without having to adjust the effectively out to a future date?
    Example:
    A = Finish goods item with two weeks lead time
    B= component of A and it has two weeks lead time
    C= component of B and has 10 weeks lead time.
    Have safety stock hard coded with an effective date of today for 100,000 units.
    I have 100,000 in inventory and I have planned orders to cover all my demands and future safety stock requirements for the next ten weeks.
    I receive a new sales order for 50,000 units with a customer request date five weeks out.
    I am getting ATP dates to assign to the new sales order 14 weeks out versus allowing me to use 50,000 units from the safety stock to schedule in week five?
    Even If I schedule the sales order for five weeks, because I have gone down two levels to confirm that I have safety stock, and It could be used, planned orders would not get generated at the next two levels, because the demand date on the safety stock is earlier than the demand date for the new order?
    Is there any resolution that anyone has found that addresses this issue?
    We have set a demand priority rule on the ASCP plan options tab to "Sales Order Priority" where we have set criteria for number one to "Sales Orders & MDS Entries Priority" and number two to "Schedule Date".
    We have found that adjusting the supply and demand dates out to cover the full 14 week period does reduce the safety stock at the lower levels, but it also creates additional starts and inventory to be put into the line, which makes this approach not feasible.
    Does anyone have any solutions to this problem? We do not build safety stock for the sake of building safety stock. We want it to be used for any sales order or forecast demand that comes within the planning horizon.
    Appreciate any inputs.
    Regards,
    Dave

    Hi Dave,
    Try this note suggestion, possibly help you in resolving your issue.
    How to Avoid Getting Safety Stock Replenishment Too Early in an ASCP Plan [ID 301629.1]
    In order to line up the safety stock supply with the changes in safety stock, a combination of the profiles must be used:
    MSC: Use FIFO Pegging as yes
    and the plan option
    Peg Supplies by Demand Priority is checked.
    The profile MSC: Use FIFO Pegging as yes will perform the following:
    For all demands and supplies, it proceeds item by item and
    pegs supplies to demands on a daily basis. Daily supplies
    and demands are not sorted. When supplies or demands
    on a given date are used up, it picks from supplies or
    demands on the next date. The unpegged supplies are
    pegged to excess.
    The peg supplies by demand priority combined with the profile above will prevent the system to plan ahead for safety stock.
    Also no safety stock smoothing is setup.
    To implement the solution, please execute the following steps:
    1. Please set the profile:
    MSC: Use FIFO Pegging as yes and
    2. Under the plan settings in the main tab the set the following options:
    Enable Pegging ON
    Peg Supplies by Demand Priority ON
    Warm Regards
    Sivaraman.G

  • MRP Planned % Safety Stock Not Generating Supply in R12 ASCP

    Playing with MRP Planned Safety Stock in an unconstrained plan. See safety stock in the horizontal plan. See safety stock in the pegging tree. Yet this type of safety stock is not generating any supply recommendations. However with "regular fixed quantity" safety stock the plan is. Thanks in advance.

    Hi
    If I understand your qn correctly., user defined SS is working and MRP planned % is not. Have you setup MRP planned % such that you gave the SS method., bucket days and % for the item attributes?
    Also make sure that you have demand for the item since it looks at your demand in future,adds up demand within the bucket days and applies the % .
    Thnx
    Partha

  • MRP Not considering Safety stock

    Hello
    We have settings as 1000 for safety stock . if the stock went below 1000 , MRP is not pulling the stock for the confirmation of the Production order. we checked the safety stock indicator in the Availability check for the Prod order confirmation . What ever the stock are available ( only unrestricted stock we want to consider for the availability check )
    Any suggestion please.
    Thanks
    JJ

    Hi,
    When your stock level goes below the Safety stock, then MRP will trigger a planned order to maintain the planned order. In your availability scope of check, if you checked the safety stock, the system will allow to consume the safety stock by posting the goods issue, if the tick is not there, it will not post the goods issue, saying insufficient stock is there.
    regards,
    V. Suresh

  • Auto-release Planned Orders is not creating WIP job after zero on-hand (i.e. Level Below  safety stock)

    Hi
    The time release fence in defined at item level as 1 day also safety stock level is defined in inventory safety stock form.
    Once MRP launch it should create the discrete job against item as zero onhand for that item but MRP workbench is showing planned order for the item instead of creating item.

    Hi
    The time release fence in defined at item level as 1 day also safety stock level is defined in inventory safety stock form.
    Once MRP launch it should create the discrete job against item as zero onhand for that item but MRP workbench is showing planned order for the item instead of creating item.

Maybe you are looking for