Not calculating Time of arrival

My N8 Anna Nokia Maps 3.08 does not calculate the Time of arrival. It shows the estimated time of arriving only with the Hours, but no Minutes (dots instead of the minutes number) - f.e. "22:....". This is so even at the Endpoint of the route.
This is very frustrating, as I use the navigation to plan my driving in order to arrive on time.
Any ideas?
P.S. This was no problem with the previous Ovi Maps 3.06.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

It seems this is a problem of the active installed font to the N8... Change the font and everything will be OK

Similar Messages

Bank charges is not calculating at the time of payment to vendor by APP

hi experts,
In APP the paying company is paying to the vendor.Now they want to issue a DD (Demand Draft) to the vendor where a bank charges is involved.
I have already customized the CHRGES/EXPENSES in Bank Determination Tab (transaction Code FBZP) to the corresponding Bank Subledger(outgoing) and also the Charge Indicator to the corressponding House Bank.
the transaction key BSP is already assigned with the ledger(Bank Charges)
I have already checked the Field status variant, it is ok
But , that system is not calculating the bank charges as it is configured in the system at the time of payment through APP when a full MM invoice verification cycle is running
Can anybody help me out?
With regards,
Sudipto Paul

You have to select update profile, which works with payment budget. Secondly, you have to define the settings for payment transfer in OF29 transaction. You should consult the following notes, in order to secure smooth payment transfer procedure:
For online update:
Note 1695556 - Main features of Customizing for onilne payment update
Note 882379 - FMPU_R: Recommendations for the online payment update
In general:
Note 400924 - Recommendations and rules for the payment transfer in FM
Note 1466979 - FM Financial transactions to be used in FI line items

Cess on TDS is not calculating at the time of posting F-47

Dear All,
Cess on TDS is not calculating at the time of F-47 (vendor Down payment Requst)
Mean system is deducting TDS amount only, not deducting Cess amount on TDS . at the time invoice posting Cess & TDS calculating in this company code (1111)
But in other (2222) companycode,system calculating cess on TDS at the time F-47 . both company codes under the same system. if we apply perticular notes on above issue is there any affect to other (2222)company code settings ?
Plse give me advise urgant.
Raja

Hi
In the withholding tax settings Define Withholding Tax Type for Invoice Posting
and Define Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting for CESS ,check whether you selected in calculation part: tax amount as base for calculation and selected inherit base.
If this is not done system will not calculate the Cess.
Regards
Aravind
Assign points if useful

Error during date calculation: Time entered not numerical

Hi All,
We are using SAP MI 7.0 SP18 Server and Client
xMAM 3.0 SR06
Now when we create a Notification using the link Notification Management of type PV and SAVE.
When Synchronized, it is completed but backend no notification is trigerring and when checked in Error Logs
the following message is shown Error during date calculation: Time entered not numerical
Kindly Suggest
Regards,
Kiran Joshua

Hi All,
I got to know how to edit the entries from merep_mon : Thanks to Chinna.
But unfortunately that did not solve my problem
I had to debug the function module of the respective SyncBO and found that the Profile type was not maintained in the backend.
Infact the error "Error during date calculation: Time entered not numerical" was misleading.
Anyways upon customising the Profile for the PJ and PV type Notifications that solved my issue.
Regards,
Kiran Joshua

TDS not calculating at the time of advance payment to vendor

hello gurus,
need urgent help ,
TDS not calculating for advance payment made to vendor, checked configuration in detail. payment WT type is marked as central invoicing prop.all other config is o.k.
regards,
Anand

Hi Anand,
Mark the WT type as No central invoicing. U can still deduct TDS. Central Invoicing concept is mandatory only in Argentina.
what u have to do is, configure the WHT code and the WHT type for "Define Withholding Tax Type for Payment Posting".
Then include the same in the vendor master in FK02 under "withholding Tax accounting" tab. mark it as liable.
these settings in the master are enough.
then when u run the f-48 for downpayment, after entering the details in the first screen and u press enter, the system will give a msg that the vendor is liable for WHT.
this is how u can do it.
award points if helpful.
Regards,
CA. Karthik Narayan N S
SAP-FICO Consultant

Pension not calculated when EE is hired mid-month

Hi All
Please suggest for the following....
When an Employee is hired in the middle of the month, the system doesn't calculate Pension Contribution.
Like if an EE is hired on 10th April. The system will calculate all payments & deductions, but it is not calculating the Pension Contributions.
I am maintaining IT 169, 171 for Pension Contribution.
The problem I found behind this is.....(WIth the help of an ABAPer)
-: System checks the Payroll Period Start Date with the Org. Assignment start date. When it doesnu2019t match, the system does not calculate the Pension Contribution.
For the time being I solved this through the following action -: In debugging, I canceled this condition (skipped this check). Then it calculated the Pension Contribution.
But, this is not the right solution for achieving that as we are changing standard SAP coding.
Please suggest any solution for the same.
Thanks & Regards

If your schema has p0169 with BEG that will happen, try put below Param1 which fits your requirement.
BEG
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll period begin date.
No changes within the current payroll period are taken into
consideration.
No proration of contributions takes place, even if the record ends
within the current payroll period.
END
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll period end date.
No changes within the current payroll period are taken into
consideration.
No proration of contributions takes place, even if the record begins
within the current payroll period.
CHK
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll check date (the pay date),
regardless of whether the check date falls into the payroll period
itself.
A record whose validity starts after the end date of the current payroll
period is still evaluated if the check date (which lies in the future)
falls within the validity period of the infotype.
FRST
Infotype records are evaluated if there is any intersection of plan
infotype and payroll period. The first intersection is taken to
determine the full period deduction amount which is stored without
proration.
LAST
Infotype records are evaluated if there is any intersection of plan
infotype and payroll period. The last intersection is taken to determine
the full period deduction amount which is stored without proration.

Depreciation not calculated and posted

Dear All
I have a problem. Actually we had a legacy data transfer last year in the month of March.
All the assets were posted to new company code fronm the old company code by using an initial clearing account.
the entries were done through f-02.
My problem lies in the fact that 4 assets which were posted at that time are not functioning well.
The balances got transfered as opening balances in Aw01n but there is no planned depreciation for them for the year 09-10.The amounts are coming as " zero" in the planned depreciation tab.
As a result of which my asset acquisition reports are not coming correct.
I have figured out the diiferences..
The differences are regarding these 4 assets only.
Could any of you please help me in finding the reason why the depreciation is not calculated on these assets since April 2009 and how they are appearing "ZERO" in the acquistion report when there is a actual balance in the asset
Thanking you
regards
Ruby

Hi
I have checked the asset in the previous company code also.. All the parameters are same..plus in that company code the sysytem has shown the planneed depreciation too for all the assets.
now I think the problem lies in the depreciation key or in some linking between depreciation key and the asset..
have you any clue about the areas that needs to be checked for this sort of linkage?
Plus there is no over charging of depreciation.... The system didnot calculate anything in the present company code.........
Regards
Ruby jamwal

BED is not calculating values after enter Excise Invoice number in MIGO

Hi,
We are doing a process of MB01 --> J1IEX --> MIGO.
At the time of J1IEX, we entered the Excise Invoice number and date. After that when we change the quantity, then BED is automatically change.
But at the time of MIGO, when we enter the Excise Invoice number, then BED is not calculating as calculated in J1IEX earlier.
This was working fine before apply the Patch. I think this is due to Patch because in our Development system still working fine but we have apply the Patch in Quality Server..there this problem comes..
Please guide what should be configuration changes has been done after apply the patch.
Applied Patch is: - SAPKH60015 & SAPKH60016..
Plz guide..

hi
i think your doing something wrong
i think first when u did j1iex then in MIGo u have to go for ONLY REFER INVOICE option
better you go for other process
DO GR for required quantity say 5 out of 10 without excise
then do J1iex with reference to GR number
regards
kunal
Edited by: Kunal Ingale on Jul 28, 2010 9:15 AM

Problem at calculation time, when using Dynamic Calc measures

Hello, We are using Essabse v6.5 and we want to upgrade to v7.1. we are performing some tests, in order to check that the Cubes we have created in 6.5 are working properly in v7.1. the problem that we are experiencing is that the calculation time for the cubes that have dynamic calc members has exploaded to 10 times more, compared to what it took at version 6.5. Do you have any idea why this happens. (also we are still using the old client "Application Manager") Furhermore, I have set up 2 cubes that are the same, except the 1st has dynamic calc memebers, whereas the 2ns has not. I perform calcualtions with the SET MSG DETAIL; and receive the following: CUBE (A) with Dynamic Calc Total Block Created: [4.3720e+03] Blocks Sparse Calculations: [8.0620e+03] Writes and [2.5338e+05] Reads Dense Calculations: [2.8000e+01] Writes and [2.8000e+01] Reads Sparse Calculations: [6.0202e+06] Cells Dense Calculations: [1.1476e+06] Cells CUBE (B) withOUT Dynamic Calc Total Block Created: [4.3720e+03] Blocks Sparse Calculations: [4.3720e+03] Writes and [3.5887e+04] Reads Dense Calculations: [2.8000e+01] Writes and [2.8000e+01] Reads Sparse Calculations: [6.0202e+06] Cells Dense Calculations: [1.1476e+06] Cells Question: Why does Cube (A) has more Sparse Calculations than Cube(B) ???? thanx

Yes, all the settings were exactly the same. See following: - Data Cache (note: we are NOT using the Data File Cache) - Index Cache - Index Page - Commit Block Interval - Cache memory Locking - Access Mode = buffered IO - Data Compression = Bit-Map encoding - Two Pass Calculatino = ON - Aggregate Missing Values = ON - CFG file Is there any new settings in 7.1 that I must configure? Is there any settings that I cannot see through the old client Application Manager, which is important? Must I install the new client in order to be able to configure correctly the Outline/Cube? Thnkx

F110-Withholding Tax Not Calculating

Dear Gurus,
For ceratin vendors in F110 system is not paying and in payment run log a msg is generated as--Internal Error:Doc Balance not zero.In one vendor there are 2 open items system is calculating WHT for one invoice correctly and showing in payment log for ther other other than posting its its showing at as a difference and sysing that doc balance is not zero.
But when I simulated the 2 invoices separately in F-53 correct WHt is shown but unable to understand why Payment Prog is not calculating for one of the documents.
My client is based out of Thailand both docs have same WHT code and and WHT Type that is at payment.Please help.
Regards
Prabin

You are saying that the invoice which are created with tax codes creates problem when it is paid through F110 that too for certain vendors, right ? Still I am asking, at the time of invoice booking (F-43), the document will have line items with payable amount, tax deductions, etc. right ? This payable amount only will be selected in F110 run. Why then you want to calculate TDS again in F110 ? With regard to your query that it is happening for certain vendors, please check the proper tax codes have been incorporated in the masters and the liable bock check is ticked.

Frequent postfix "master exit time has arrived" error messages in the log

I'm seeing this in my mail.log every minute:
Dec 1 12:27:46 Executor postfix/master[6394]: master exit time has arrived
Dec 1 12:27:46 Executor postfix/master[6399]: daemon started -- version 2.5.5, configuration /etc/postfix
Dec 1 12:28:46 Executor postfix/master[6399]: master exit time has arrived
Dec 1 12:28:46 Executor postfix/master[6406]: daemon started -- version 2.5.5, configuration /etc/postfix
Dec 1 12:29:46 Executor postfix/master[6406]: master exit time has arrived
Dec 1 12:29:46 Executor postfix/master[6409]: daemon started -- version 2.5.5, configuration /etc/postfix
This does not seem to be normal behavior. Is something misconfigured here? How can I fix this?

just experienced this and found your thread while looking for an answer.
do you have any thing in /var/spool/postfix/maildrop ? if there is something there, then launchd will keep launching postfix.
(ls /var/spool/postfix/maildrop)
i had a file there, and the permissions were wrong for it to process. so it kept launching, but never was able to clear the folder.
i did a chmod 775 on that document ( something like: sudo chmod 755 /var/spool/postfix/maildrop/* ), and that has fixed it after years of issues.
i'm not sure it's the best answer, but worked for me.
Message was edited by: neuralstatic
btw, i had tried to disable the launchd entry for it, but that was no help.

Tax not calculating in MIRO within a date range.

Hi Experts ,
We have created a tax code and assign its values in condition types under two separate Key Combination.
1) Tax Classification : 4% ( Non Validity) , in access sequence exclusive indicator is set aganst it.
2) Tax Code : 4% (Valdity - Sept - till 9999), Exclusive indicator is not set against it.
Issue is that when i create a PO ( at any date) system is picking up the taxes.
Nom at the time of MIRO , if i post the MIRO before sept. system is allowing me to do so and calculate taxes correctly.
But when i change the date to Sept the system does not calculate taxes.
Even though the Tax Classification has more priority in access sequence compared to tax code , i am failed to understand why system is not calculating taxes.
I have tried deleting conditions in tax code key combinations but still system is not calculating taxes in MIRO,
Pls guide.
Regards
Honey

Hi Ramesh ,
i have done the same . Maintained he condition record via FV11. but system is not calculating tax for sept. month in MIRO.
In PO tax calculation is perfect but in MIRO it is not calculating tax.( ticked calculate tax option also).

System not calculating as mentioned in the price differentials multipliers

Dear Folks,
We are using contingent worker functionality in R12.1.3.
1) For example,we have a PO with line type as rated based temporary labour, UOM as "HR" , unit price as 100 and total amount is 100000.
2) Mentioned multipliers in PO for price differentials as Holiday as 2 and Overtime as 1.5.
3) In general working hours in a day is 8 hrs.The calendar defined in the system with Mon-Fri as working days.
4) Timecard entered in OTL with Sunday as '8' hrs, Monday as '10' hrs.
5) Whereas system need to calculate as for Sunday 8hrs=>8*100*2=1600 and for Monday =>10hrs=(8*100)+2*100*1.5=1100 in total need to show as 2700.
6) And those time card details interfaced from OTL to purchasing and it shows as received with an amount of 1800 as received in the PO shipments under more tab.
System does not calculated as per mentioned price differential multipliers.
Am i missing any setup?
Any help will be highly appreciated
Regards,
Sri.

Please someone help...I am stuck on this at some place or the other and now finally at this place when I thought that everything is well:(

I have been using time machine to back up my Mac Book Pro 3.1 to my Time Capsule. Now the Time machine hangs up on "calculating time remaining".

I have been using time machine to back up my Mac Book Pro 3.1 to my Time Capsule. Now the Time machine hangs up on "calculating time remaining".
Mac Book Pro - 3.1-15-inch 2.4/2.2GHz), Processor 2.2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
Operating system : OS X 10.10.1
Time Machine Version 1.3, Copyright 2007-2014 Apple Inc., Modified Tuesday, September 9, 2014 at 6:03 PM
Time Capsule: 500 GB C 2007
This Time Machine software worked satisfactory until Monday Nov, 10 2014 and I have backups until that time. For several years, the software deleted the oldest back up to save the latest one. This is acceptable to me as I have off site storage that is updated every 3 months. How do I get Time machine working again?

I have spent a couple of days trying to respond to Linc Davis. Finally I figured it out . The following is a copy of data from my console from the initiation of a time machine backup until it gets stuck trying to calculate the time remaining. There is no indication that anything starts saving. I copied about 3 minutes of data. This is probably way too much data, but I do not know what is relevant.
Thanks for the help,
calcool
12/22/14 3:16:54.655 PM com.apple.backupd[551]: Starting manual backup
12/22/14 3:16:55.057 PM com.apple.backupd[551]: Attempting to mount network destination URL: afp://”name”%20”lastname”@Home%20Network%20Time%20Capsule._afpovertcp._tcp.loca l./Time%20Capsule
12/22/14 3:16:57.262 PM mds[33]: (Volume.Normal:2464) volume:0x7fed5ab54000 ********** Bootstrapped Creating a default store:0 SpotLoc:(null) SpotVerLoc:(null) occlude:0 /Volumes/Time Capsule
12/22/14 3:16:57.565 PM com.apple.backupd[551]: Mounted network destination at mount point: /Volumes/Time Capsule using URL: afp://”name”%20”lastname”@Home%20Network%20Time%20Capsule._afpovertcp._tcp.loca l./Time%20Capsule
12/22/14 3:17:08.000 PM kernel[0]: hfs: mounted Backup of “name” “lastname”’s MacBook Pro on device disk3s2
12/22/14 3:17:09.625 PM com.apple.backupd[551]: Disk image /Volumes/Time Capsule/”name” “lastname”’s MacBook Pro (2).sparsebundle mounted at: /Volumes/Backup of “name” “lastname”’s MacBook Pro
12/22/14 3:17:11.112 PM com.apple.backupd[551]: Backing up to /dev/disk3s2: /Volumes/Backup of “name” “lastname”’s MacBook Pro/Backups.backupdb
12/22/14 3:17:24.931 PM “name”[593]: audit warning: soft /var/audit
12/22/14 3:17:24.944 PM “name”[594]: audit warning: allsoft
12/22/14 3:17:24.958 PM “name”[596]: audit warning: closefile /var/audit/20141222201654.20141222201724
12/22/14 3:17:26.544 PM com.apple.backupd[551]: Event store UUIDs don't match for volume: Macintosh HD
12/22/14 3:17:34.767 PM com.apple.backupd[551]: Deep event scan at path:/ reason:must scan subdirs|new event db|
12/22/14 3:17:34.768 PM com.apple.backupd[551]: Reading cached event database from: /Volumes/Backup of “name” “lastname”’s MacBook Pro/Backups.backupdb/”name” “lastname”’s MacBook Pro (2)/2014-12-22-151726.inProgress/F85FEA51-E137-471A-84DA-A2C00E4ECB42/.1BEF88C6 -20C3-3DDC-AE30-05EAB2AFCC15.eventdb
12/22/14 3:17:38.115 PM com.apple.backupd[551]: Using cached disk scan
12/22/14 3:17:39.114 PM com.apple.backupd[551]: Saved event cache at /Volumes/Backup of “name” “lastname”’s MacBook Pro/Backups.backupdb/”name” “lastname”’s MacBook Pro (2)/2014-12-22-151726.inProgress/5BC46A53-25E8-4C4A-8947-AFB221D1FA0C/.1BEF88C6 -20C3-3DDC-AE30-05EAB2AFCC15.eventdb
12/22/14 3:17:39.355 PM com.apple.backupd[551]: Not using file event preflight for Macintosh HD
12/22/14 3:19:14.782 PM CoreServicesUIAgent[294]: unexpected message <OS_xpc_error: <error: 0x7fff77befc60> { count = 1, contents =
"XPCErrorDescription" => <string: 0x7fff77beff70> { length = 18, contents = "Connection invalid" }
}>
12/22/14 3:20:15.207 PM locationd[182]: Location icon should now be in state 'Active'
12/22/14 3:20:17.267 PM locationd[182]: Location icon should now be in state 'Inactive'
12/22/14 3:20:17.884 PM locationd[182]: Location icon should now be in state 'Active'
12/22/14 3:20:18.483 PM sandboxd[296]: ([310]) com.apple.metada(310) deny mach-lookup com.apple.cfnetwork.cfnetworkagent
12/22/14 3:20:21.646 PM com.apple.metadata.SpotlightNetHelper[310]: [SLSUGGESTIONS] Location managed failed with error Error Domain=kCLErrorDomain Code=0 "The operation couldn’t be completed. (kCLErrorDomain error 0.)"
12/22/14 3:20:23.892 PM WindowServer[143]: disable_update_timeout: UI updates were forcibly disabled by application "Spotlight" for over 1.00 seconds. Server has re-enabled them.
12/22/14 3:20:26.526 PM WindowServer[143]: common_reenable_update: UI updates were finally reenabled by application "Spotlight" after 3.63 seconds (server forcibly re-enabled them after 1.00 seconds)
12/22/14 3:20:28.298 PM sandboxd[296]: ([310]) com.apple.metada(310) deny mach-lookup com.apple.cfnetwork.cfnetworkagent
12/22/14 3:20:29.094 PM com.apple.xpc.launchd[1]: (com.apple.quicklook[599]) Endpoint has been activated through legacy launch(3) APIs. Please switch to XPC or bootstrap_check_in(): com.apple.quicklook
12/22/14 3:20:30.670 PM bird[263]: Assertion failed: ![_xpcClients containsObject:client]
12/22/14 3:20:30.670 PM bird[263]: Assertion failed: ![_xpcClients containsObject:client]
12/22/14 3:20:32.294 PM com.apple.InputMethodKit.UserDictionary[600]: -[PFUbiquitySwitchboardEntryMetadata setUseLocalStorage:](808): CoreData: Ubiquity: “name”~00000000-0000-1000-8000-001B63947FCF:UserDictionary
Using local storage: 1
12/22/14 3:20:32.317 PM bird[263]: Assertion failed: ![_xpcClients containsObject:client]
12/22/14 3:20:32.769 PM locationd[182]: Location icon should now be in state 'Inactive'
12/22/14 3:20:34.580 PM Console[601]: Failed to connect (_consoleX) outlet from (NSApplication) to (ConsoleX): missing setter or instance variable
12/22/14 3:20:35.540 PM com.apple.xpc.launchd[1]: (com.apple.imfoundation.IMRemoteURLConnectionAgent) The _DirtyJetsamMemoryLimit key is not available on this platform.
12/22/14 3:20:36.388 PM com.apple.xpc.launchd[1]: (com.apple.auditd[604]) Endpoint has been activated through legacy launch(3) APIs. Please switch to XPC or bootstrap_check_in(): com.apple.auditd
12/22/14 3:20:36.693 PM “name”[608]: audit warning: soft /var/audit
12/22/14 3:20:36.718 PM “name”[607]: audit warning: allsoft
12/22/14 3:20:37.045 PM “name”[610]: audit warning: closefile /var/audit/20141222201724.20141222202036
12/22/14 3:20:37.438 PM bird[263]: Assertion failed: ![_xpcClients containsObject:client]
12/22/14 3:20:42.437 PM QuickLookSatellite[611]: CGSConnectionByID: 0 is not a valid connection ID.
12/22/14 3:20:42.437 PM QuickLookSatellite[611]: Invalid Connection ID 0
12/22/14 3:20:42.477 PM QuickLookSatellite[611]: CGSConnectionByID: 0 is not a valid connection ID.
12/22/14 3:20:42.477 PM QuickLookSatellite[611]: CGSConnectionByID: 0 is not a valid connection ID.
12/22/14 3:20:42.612 PM QuickLookSatellite[611]: [QL] No sandbox token for request <QLThumbnailRequest stackshot.log>, it will probably fail
12/22/14 3:20:42.613 PM QuickLookSatellite[611]: [QL] No sandbox token for thumbnail request file:///Library/Logs/stackshot.log, it will probably fail
12/22/14 3:20:42.615 PM QuickLookSatellite[611]: [QL] No sandbox token for request <QLThumbnailRequest stackshot-syms.log>, it will probably fail
12/22/14 3:20:42.615 PM QuickLookSatellite[611]: [QL] No sandbox token for thumbnail request file:///Library/Logs/stackshot-syms.log, it will probably fail

Calculated time of predecessor and successor task

Hi
In standard system calculated time of predecessor and successor task are not strictly continued. For example, Task1 under Phase One is a predecessor task of Task3 which is under Phase Three, and Phase Two is between Phase One and Three. The earliest finish time of Task1 is 8.31, but the successor task Task3 does not begins on 9.1(maybe it's earliest start time is 10.1 e.g). That is because the system takes the duration of Phase Two into account. How to break this time structure and let Task3 starts strictly following Task1(here the earliest start date is 9.1). Is there any configuration or BAPI we can use here?
Regards,
Yemi

Hi Yemi,
This is the standard behavior in PPM system since PPM is mainly used for projects where stage-gate methodology is followed.
To overcome this and allow parallel phase scheduling, you need to implement BADI - DPR_SCHEDULING. Refer below thread, where it is discussed in detail.
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3282028
Regards,
Ravi

Not calculating Time of arrival

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for