NOT including files in organizer

Hello all:
When I save a file, in the "Save" dialogue, its default is "Include in Organizer" (the box is checked). Is there a way to "Not include in Organizer" as the default?
Thanks
Mike

<[email protected]> wrote<br />> When I save a file...Is there a way to "Not include in Organizer" as the <br />> default?<br /><br />Mike,<br /><br />Nobody has yet found such a method. Or, if they have, they are keeping it <br />quiet. It is a frequent topic with no solution, to date.<br /><br />Byron

Similar Messages

Fails to burn - not including files!!

Hello there,
I'm in the process of trying to burn two DVD's I've created. They build fine but when they go to format they always fail. In the log window it comes up with multiple errors such as this:
Warning: The directory "/Volumes/ANNADRIANACACIA/FINAL PROJECTS' will not be included in the final disc.
From look at them all of these warnings are files that need to be on the disc because they have the same names as the movie files that need to be seen... I've never had this problem before and I'm not sure what to do. I completely rebuilt the DVD today thinking that might solve the problem but it's still having the same issue.
Any help would be great! The deadline for it is approaching fast!
Thanks!

If anyone has any suggestions I would really appreciate it!

"The file is damaged or is a format that cannot be included in the Organizer"

I have been "repairing" or "restoring" an old photo using PSE 3.0. I scanned the photo to get it into my computer. I began by making 2 copies of the image in case I goofed and needed to start anew. I began "cleaning and cloning" [my terminology, not Adobe's] on a part time schedule. At the end of each sitting, I would close PSE and save the work back to the original file in "My Pictures". [I expect to get chided on this, so fire away.] After I had moved the image into and out of PSE a few times, I was presented with the phrase: "The file is damaged or is a format that cannot be included in the organizer." PSE will not re-open the image now. The Properties show the file to be "Adobe Photoshop Elements Image" and the file name ends with .PSD . I cannot remember precisely what steps I took to close PSE and save the results the last time I worked on the image. I have "restored" or "repaired" about a dozen other old images thus far with satisfactory results [ I may look back and marvel at the naivete of that statement later] and this never happened before. Is this image forever barred from being imported back to PSE for further work? Should I begin the project from scratch with one of the spare copies? I have been using "Adobe PSE 3.0 Classroom in a Book", and "The Missing Manual" [Barbara Brundage] as my guides. Do I need to use the Photo Organizer exclusively to store my "works in progress"? I am using Windows XP Home.

Larry,
>save the work back to the original file
As long as you have a backup (as you do) and are not repeatedly saving as jpg which will progressively degrade the file there is nothing wrong with this procedure. (You should save as psd or tif.)
I don't know what happened to corrupt the file but you may be able to save your work. Download the free Irfanview from here:
http://www.irfanview.com/
Try to open the corrupted psd. If successful save it to another name as psd and again as tif. Then see if either or both can be opened in PE3.
>Do I need to use the Photo Organizer exclusively to store my "works in progress"?
No. I never include some projects in Organizer unless I want to be able to find them easily later based on multiple criteria.
Let us know how you make out.
Bob

PE9 "The file is damaged or is a format that cannot be included in the Organizer"

I am trying to rebuild my Photoshop Elements 9 Organizer content after a previous computer was physically damaged beyond repair.
I reinstalled PE9 and told it to import the image files from my HDD. It imported a large number but also rejected a large number with the message "The file is damaged or is a format that cannot be included in the Organizer".
These are files which were happily resident and accessible in the previous PE9 installation on the now-dead computer and there is nothing special about them. They are almost all .JPG format (this is not a RAW or CR2 problem) and those that I have accessed by other means (e.g. with Irfanview) are not damaged.
Can someone tell me why PS9 is not able to import these files ?
Thank you.

Hi pacman110,
I was getting the same error message when importing a folder with only jpg images to PSE 9 Organizer (trial version).
Since I read a couple of threads where corrupted EXIF data was a possible reason for import failures, I changed the EXIF data - in the Windows Explorer's file properties dialog (Win 7) - to some value, applied it and changed it back again. After that the import worked fine for that file.
Later I figured out, that all images causing the error were previously tagged in Picasa 3 and later untagged - so these images actually had no tags at import. Tagging the image(s) again (in Picasa) also seemed to solve the issue.
In my case it unfortunately didn't solve the problem, because I wanted to get rid of the Picasa Tag (IPTC keyword). Therefore I removed it using the file properties dialog.
Picasa still shows the image as tagged though. Removing the - on the file non-existing - tag in Picasa results in the same issue as above. At this point the only workaround is to remove the tag in Picasa, close Picasa and set and remove some tag with Windows Explorer, which is pretty annoying regarding the amount of files.
Conclusion: removing a tag with Picasa seems to make jpg images unimportable to PSE 9 Organizer.
Workaround: Add the tag again or remove with Windows Explorer or remove tag with Picasa, close Picasa and then tag/untag the image(s) with Windows Explorer.
Maybe this helps.

Jsp taglibs in include files not detected, throws errors, no code insight

I have a jsp which is included in all the other jsp. it looks something like this
taglibs.jsp
<%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core" prefix="c" %>
<%@ taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/fmt" prefix="fmt" %>
<%@ taglib uri="http://www.springframework.org/tags" prefix="spring" %>
<%@ taglib prefix="form" uri="http://www.springframework.org/tags/form" %>
test.jsp
<%@ include file="/jsp/menu/taglibs.jsp"%>
<html>
     <head>
          <title>Tours</title>
     </head>
     <body>
<form:form commandName="testCommand">
               <form:hidden path="tour.firstname" id="tour.firstname" />
and so on.
I am having 2 problems
1. the jsp editor show errors all over the place saying
element path not expected
element commandName not expected etc.
2. no code insights.
but if i include the taglib def in test.jsp it dosn't show any error and also provides code insights. but seldom do people include all taglibs in all jsps.
is there a way for Jdeveloper to show code insights in jsp pages which includes a jsp or like xml schemas could be added at some place(tools-pref-xml schemas) and when used anywhere, would provide code insights.

am not sure, try with this
<jsp:include   .../>

EJB project IDE build dos not include properties files

We have property files also which we want included as part of the build process
for EJB projects but if we use the IDE build it does not include them. We have
to therefore export the IDE build and customize it to include *.properties like
this
<zip basedir="${dest.path}" zipfile="${ejb.outputJar}" encoding="UTF8">  <zipfileset dir="${project.local.directory}" includes="*.properties"
/> </zip>
which causes a problem for us because the exported build file is specific to a
user's local PC and cannot be used in a team environment.
How can we have the IDE build include all the files within an EJB project i.e.
include properties files also.

Hey Jamie,
Currently there is no support to include other .properties files into
the internal build. There's a build.properties that you get as part of
an EJB project which you could place your values into and use that as
your template for your team based development and check that into your
source control.
If you'd really like to get gross and hack Workshop a little bit you
could modify the default EJB project template to use your .properties
file for every EJB project you create. This would then splat a copy of
your .properties file into the root of the EJB project.
To do that you'd go to {your BEAHOME}\workshop\templates and crack open
the ejb-project.zip template zip file and merge your settings into the
existing build.properties file. This has the same
effect as replacing the .properties file after you've created your
project only it keeps you from having to perform that step each time.
The downside of this is that each person on your team would then have to
update that template zip file in their workshop installation. (I'd make
sure to backup the original template file before performing this
activity so you can always go back to the original template).
Hope this helps,
-Michael
Jamie wrote:
We have property files also which we want included as part of the build process
for EJB projects but if we use the IDE build it does not include them. We have
to therefore export the IDE build and customize it to include *.properties like
this
<zip basedir="${dest.path}" zipfile="${ejb.outputJar}" encoding="UTF8">  <zipfileset dir="${project.local.directory}" includes="*.properties"
/> </zip>
which causes a problem for us because the exported build file is specific to a
user's local PC and cannot be used in a team environment.
How can we have the IDE build include all the files within an EJB project i.e.
include properties files also.

When I send e-mail messages with file by using a POP3 in Exchange 2010 I received delivered message with file. How I can disable this functions that file do not include to delivery message. I use Exchange 2010 only local users.

When I send e-mail messages with file by using a POP3 in Exchange 2010 I received delivered message with file. How I can disable this functions that file do not include to delivery message. I use Exchange 2010 only local users.

I think there is not native rule for this, but you could try a transport rule which removes all attachments over a very small file size like 1KB.
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2009/05/11/3407435.aspx
CRM Advisor

%@ include file= ... does not work properly in Portal

I am devloping a portlet based on a jsp that uses some <%@include ..> tags. I have
a problem in that variables declared and used in one jsp is not visible in a jsp
that is included later on. Also, the scope of the page import tag of the main
jsp does not cover the included jsp's.
<%@ page import="javax.servlet.* ......>
<%@ include file="variables.jsp" %> // Classes imported above are not recognised
in this jsp
<%@ include file="code.jsp" %> // Variables declared and used in variables.jsp
are not visible here
The exact same code runs very well in a Tomcat container (as pure jsp, not portlet)
Can anybody help here please?

Geir -
I have the same problem. If you do solve it, please post it to this thread.
Thanks
Kunal
"Geir Willumsen" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
I am devloping a portlet based on a jsp that uses some <%@include ..>
tags. I have
a problem in that variables declared and used in one jsp is not visible
in a jsp
that is included later on. Also, the scope of the page import tag of
the main
jsp does not cover the included jsp's.
<%@ page import="javax.servlet.* ......>
<%@ include file="variables.jsp" %> // Classes imported above are not
recognised
in this jsp
<%@ include file="code.jsp" %> // Variables declared and used in variables.jsp
are not visible here
The exact same code runs very well in a Tomcat container (as pure jsp,
not portlet)
Can anybody help here please?

WorkShop 3.2.0 - WEB-INF/classes not included in war file

I've created the "Faces Example" project in Workshop Studio 3.2.0 and it's running fine. However, when I export the war file to run it on another server the class files located at "WEB-INF/classes" are not included with the war.
Any suggestions on what I may be doing wrong would be greatly appreciated.
thks!

Unfortunately no, the issue with output folder being ignored occurs only with example apps bundled with Workshop product.
You can try the following workaround:
- In Workshop, Project > Properties - Java Build Path, switch to Source tab - "Remove the source folder listing" - Click OK and dismiss Properties window.
- Project > Properties - Java Build Path > Source Tab, add the same source folder entry - Click OK
- Export as WAR
With this you should see the class files bundled under output directory structure (Ex: WEB-INF/classes).

Project librarys not included in WAR file with deployment (WEB-INF/lib)

Using JDeveloper 9.0.5.2
Project Libraries are not included in WEB-INF/lib when deploying. Although the files are selected in the deployment file at 'Contributors'. Within the 'filter' the .jar files are missing.
To solve it i have to register again (i have already made the librarys project library's) the files within Tools->ManageLibrarys as user library's.
The other workaround is to make the library's System Library's within the project.
In my opinion it is a bug that you must include the project librarys as user librarys within the 'LibraryManager'

Unfortunately no, the issue with output folder being ignored occurs only with example apps bundled with Workshop product.
You can try the following workaround:
- In Workshop, Project > Properties - Java Build Path, switch to Source tab - "Remove the source folder listing" - Click OK and dismiss Properties window.
- Project > Properties - Java Build Path > Source Tab, add the same source folder entry - Click OK
- Export as WAR
With this you should see the class files bundled under output directory structure (Ex: WEB-INF/classes).

ADMT 3.2 Group Migration - Include File error: The object was not found in the domain

Hello,
I have been digging for weeks and still no answer. I am trying to migrate Group across two domains and if I select the group, it works just fine. But I want to bulk-migrate groups. So I am going the Include-File route. when ever I load the file I get
the bulk of the groups processed but I get a dialogue box that states:
The following objects are either not found or do not meet selection requirement. No migration will be performed on these objects.
Then I get a list a group and the message states:
The object was not found in the domain "contoso.com"
Does any one know anything about this or how to fix it? I have compared the files with good/bad versions using ADSI edit and from its POV they look the same.

Hi,
Thanks for your post.
There is an attribute named "showInAdvancedViewOnly" which specifies whether the object is to be visible in the "Advanced" mode of user interfaces. This is to say, if the schema attribute "ShowInAdvanceViewOnly" is set to TRUE for any security principal
in AD, we would not be able to find that account or group while trying to migrate it except the simple ADUC search. Just as the issue you encountered.
Therefore, please enable the "Advanced" mode in Active Directory Users and Computers, and then check if the three groups could be migrated or not.
If anything unclear or you have any questions about this case, please feel free to let me know.
Thanks and I look forward to your reply.
Best regards,
Ann Zhu

Weblogic 9.1/10 not working on jsp:directive.include file="file.jspf"/

Does anyone know how to get rid of this problem? I have a jsp page including a sun java studio creator created page fragment using the tag:
<jsp:directive.include file="myHeader.jspf"/>
here myHeader.jspf is a page fragment.
after deployment, weblogic server report error as:
weblogic.servlet.jsp.CompilationException: Failed to compile JSP /Page1.jsp
Page1.jsp:15:57: Error in "C:\bea\user_projects\domains\base_domain\servers\AdminServer\tmp\_WL_user\proj\grb4mk\war\myHeader.jspf" at line 1: The encoding "null" specified in the XML prolog is unsupported.
<jsp:directive.include file="myHeader.jspf"/>
^----------------^
Any idea? I tried both weblogic 9 and 10, same error, change to
<jsp:include page="myHeader.jspf"/>
works. the question is: why not read jsp 1.2 tag? Any way to make it work with jsp:directive.include tag?
thanks in advance.
Edited by: user10243594 on Sep 10, 2008 10:22 AM

The "jsp:directive.include" tag is only valid in an well-formed XML file that specifies all the relevant namespaces. The "jsp:include" tag is used in a JSP file. I'll bet the beginning of your file shows that you don't have a valid and well-formed XML file.
If you found that "jsp:include" worked, then that confirms you have an ordinary JSP file here. Why are you trying to use the XML form? The result of "jsp:include" in a JSP file will be exactly the same as the analogous tag in an XML file.

LabView 2010 Application Builder for EXE Always Included files are not Included

In LabVIEW 2010 F2, When I am using the Application Builder to build an EXE file, I have listed 10 or so files to Be "Always Included". But when I Explore the directory where the EXE was built, those "Always Included" files are not there or in any subdirectory under the EXE file.
This frequently makes my EXE file not work properly because important files are missing. I have to spend extra debugging time to find out the the cause of my problem is missing files that the Application Builder should have transferred "Always".
Why did the Application Builder, when building an EXE target, not include the files that should be "Always Included"?
Why does the Application Builder ignore these files specifications?

Dennis Knutson wrote:
The build does include files you select. Post an example project with a small VI and some separate files where this does not happen.
No, it does not appear that all of the files that I listed in the "Always Include" list are copied during the Build process to the Build directory or any subdirectory under that.
The Build Source Files.jpg file shows most of the list of the files that should be "Always Included". Notice the .VI and .ctl files that are listed
The Build Directory.jpg file shows the file in the Build directory that were built.
The Data Directory.jpg file shows the data directory under the Build directory and may include some of the files listed in the "Always Include", but not all of them.
The other subdirectories under the Build directory were created by me and do not include any files that were copied during the Build process.
So not ALL of the files that were included in the "Always Include" list were copied into the Build directory area as expected. ALL of the files that are listed as "Always Include" should be copied, if they exist. Those files existed when then were selected for the List and they existed at the time of the Build.
I can not include an example project that demonstrates this. I am prevented from doing so by the terms of an NDA. You are going to have to take my word that this event is real and happens the same way every time. This information should be sufficient for someone to investigate why do not ALL of the files listed in the "Always Include" list are copied into the Build directory area regardless of the file type or contents.
Attachments:
Build Source Files.jpg ‏151 KB
Build Directory.jpg ‏125 KB
Data Directory.jpg ‏131 KB

How can I get a count of files in a directory that does not include subfolders?

Information [Comand I] gives me an "items" number that includes subfolders; however, Box gives me a number that excludes subfolders and includes only files. I am trying to double check that I have migrated everything from a local directory to a Box; thus, I would like a way to a count of just the number of files in a local directory that does not include subfolders but rather is limited to files. This has been surprisingly hard to find.
Thanks,
Stu

Sort the contents of the folder by Kind. While holding down the Shift key click on the first and last file and start to drag them. The number of the files being dragged will be displayed in a red circle.
Not elegant but works.

Saved pdf file does not include filled in text

i am using adobe acrobat pro; trail version. I can fill in a fillable pdf file but after saving the file and then emailing the filethe received email attachment does not include my text included in the pdf form?

It most likely does include it in the form, but the PDF viewer that's being used does not display it. If the user were to use Adobe Reader/Acrobat, the form data should appear as expected. The default PDF viewer that mobile devices and some browsers use don't have sufficient support for forms.
If the recipient does not need to interact with the form fields, you can flatten the form before sending it out. This converts the form field appearances to regular page content, so it will very likely appear fine in most any PDF viewer. Post again if you need help flattening form fields using Acrobat.

NOT including files in organizer

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for