Note 1479040 - Header Condition not deleted during GOA distribution

Hi all
i do see condition at header level.
I know item wise condition for MATERIAL CONDITION
how header condition helps in the business . in what way.
Muthu

Gregory Mathews wrote:
Hi Gurus,
>
> I have an LIV with R block in the header level. The invoice contains a line item for planned delivery cost condition type FRB1 which was entered manually during PO creation.(no condition record exists for FRB1). But the condition type FRB1 is missing from the PO line item now and when trying to release the invoice block via MRBR, it gives the message that the 'list is incomplete'.
> The PO is not having any release strategy and the invoice number is available in the index table RBKP_BLOCKED.
>
> The condition type FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-triggering the pricing. The business needs the pricing to be carried out on the shipment date from the vendors site. So when the vendor issues the goods, the same is updated in the pricing date field in PO line item and the pricing is re-triggered. So in this case the happenings were in the below sequence.
>
> 1. Buyer created PO with manually entered FRB1 condition type.
> 2. Invoice posted against the PO.
> 3. When vendor has shipped the goods, the ASN updates the pricing date in the PO and carries out re-pricing. The FRB1 got deleted from the PO on re-pricing as no condition record existed.
> 4. Goods receipt posted
> 5. Trying to release the invoice in MRBR, but the system gives the message that the list is incomplete.
>
> Please suggest how to go ahead with the resolution of the issue.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
Hi Greg,
Are there any a/c entries showing in GR a/c doc for this cond type? I think it could be a bug when you run the ASN Idoc. Try to un-check Delete indicator for FRB1 which would stop it getting deleted.
Regards
Shiva

Similar Messages

JSESSIONID not deleted during SSO logout

We have a ADF/Struts webapp on OracleAS 10.1.2.0.2 protected by SSO (mod_osso). When a user logs off from SSO, all a success mark is shown from each partner app where the user was logged in (including our application), but the remains logged in to the webapp nevertheless.
I have tracked the problem down to the JSESSIONID cookie, which causes the user to be logged in the application as long as the cookie is present. All the strictly SSO-related cookies are deleted during the logout except the JSESSIONID for the SSO partner webapp. The user is always correctly logged out from e.g. OIDDAS after logout.
After logout, if I go and destroy the cookie either by manually deleting it from my browser or by closing the web browser, mod_osso shows immediately the SSO login page. i hav also verified by tracing the HTTP traffic that it is the JSESSIONID cookie that causes this behaviour.
In Metalink article Note:258200.1, it is said that JSESSIONID cookie is not directly related to SSO so why is it a key factor when deciding whether a user actually is logged off from the application? Furthermore, the metalink article clearly states that the JSESSIONID cookie is deleted during logout (which is not the case).
As far as I remember, we have never been able to see it working in our setup.
Can mod_osso/SSO/whatever be configured do delete the JSESSIONID during the SSO log off or what would be the correct way to get the logoff working? Furthermore, shouldn't mod_osso actually ignore the JSESSIONID cookie and only care about the SSO-related cookies when deciding whether to allow the user in?
TIA,
Markus

We solved the problem by implementing a Servlet filter that takes care of invalidating the user session if the user has logged out (either explicitly or through Global User Inactivity Timeout).
The solution follows the guidelines described in
Oracle Identity Management Application Developer's Guide section "9.4.1 Single Sign-Off and Application Logout" (http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14099_19/idmanage.1012/b14087/mod_osso.htm#BJFGAGIA)
IMHO, the solution is a bit overkill, but it solved the problem. We haven't yet tried the solutions proposed by Rodrigo.

Scheduling Lines not deleted during Product Heuristic

Hi All
During Planning run in PPDS, Surlplus Schedule lines are not getting deleted. The Heuristic using is Planning of Standard lots in 3 horizons. Earlier these schedule line were created based on Dependant demand. Since the dependant demand is deleted, we were expecting that the surplus schedule lines gets deleted during Planning run. But it is not happening.
Please note that the surplus schedule lines are well with in the Horizons defind in the heuristic.
Interesting point here is, in RRP3 view, if we execute variable heuristic using heuristic Planning of standard lots, it is perfectly deleting Excess Schedule lines
whereas it is not with heuristics Planning of standard lots in 3 horizons
Am I missing any settings here?
Please let me know
regards
Vijay

Hi Rohit
Thx
Let me implement and get back to you
Thank you very much again
regards
Vijay

Why overdued pr is not deleted during DRP planning run in APO?

the PR information still contain external PR created in DRP planning mode and it was not deleted.
I am doubt about that the planning run in ROP planning mode cannot delete old PR before recalculating PR.

I found the root cause of this symptom and have a plan to fix them.
The root cause of it is that DRP planning run has not performed successfully.
1. Details.
For material: P174552
This material’s BOD hierarchy is
4860 (Reorder point based)
└ 6000 (Reorder point based)
└ 6080 (Period based)
For both 4860, 6000 Reorder point based planning mode, but for 6080 Period Based planning mode.
This 6080’s Period based is incorrect because this material’s ABC grade is ‘N’; it should be Reorder point based.
As you see it in below screen-shot, there is error log in DRP planning for this material.
I found that about 5% of materials has incorrect planning mode.
2. Fixing Plan:
This weekend I will recalculate all material’s planning mode again and
will Run DRP planning process chain in monthly job again.

Listened to podcasts not deleted during sync

Hi All,
All of a sudden when I sync my iPod Touch to Tunes it no longer will properly sync listened to podcasts. They used to get synced to iTunes and marked as read. Now, they stay marked as unlistened in iTunes (blue dot) and get remarked on the iPod as unlistened to (blue dot) even though I have listened to the podcasts completely through to the end.
It almost appears as though the sync from the direction of iPod to iTunes has stopped functioning and I am only getting syncing in the direction of iTunes to iPod.
I have not changed any settings in iTunes. I have it set to sync unplayed episodes of selected podcasts which has always worked correctly for me in the past. My listened to podcasts used to be deleted from the iPod and only the unlistened/new podcasts would be synced to my iPod.
How do I correct this problem?
Thanks for your help.
Sue

I've seen and reported something like this as well. In my case, what I think I've figured out is that the "update podcast" function isn't happening UNLESS there is a new podcast episode downloaded for that subscription. I'm not seeing the heard/watched podcast getting remarked as unheard/unwatched on my iPod. If I go into the podcast list and ctrl-click and manually say "update podcast" it will delete the heard/watched episodes.
I never played much in the settings, but always have download all available and keep unheard podcasts selected. When this problem started I noticed a setting on each podcast regarding "auto delete" that I'd never noticed before. They seem to have been set randomly to "auto delete" or "don't auto delete", but again, I don't remember seeing or setting this before so it could have been something I did. I selected all the podcasts and set them to "auto delete".

Music not deleting during sync

I added a bunch of music to my iphone no issue. But then I got bored with some of it and unmarked said artists and genres from my sync settings and selected new stuff to replace it.
The new music added no worries. But the boring stuff wasn't deleted. I've checked it four times to make sure everything was unselected.
And no I'm not using iTunes Match.
I've tried resetting my iphone, tried toggling off Sync Music and then turning it back on. I'm not using a device backup so there's no old settings to have gotten corrupted.
And the double odd, my ipad isn't having this issue.

My one update: I talked with a Genius, and he said the memory fluctuation has to do with the converting to 128 kps. Although now that I think about it, wouldn't that imply that as my phone memory changes from more left over to less, it should end up at the "more" level, with the less memory available value being for the non converted case?
Also what's odd is that if I turn off the convert option, my memory fluctuates by 4 GB, not 0.5 GB. No one seems to be able to, or interested in, answering this question, but I thought I'd add more conundrum to the question.

Header condition type value not displayed in sales order output

Hi gurus,
I have observed a strange issue regarding a header condition in a sales order.
we have a set up like following:
1. If the Header condition XXXX is used in sales Order then this value should be printed on sales order output.
2. If the Header condition mentioned in above point is not maintained in sales order it should print the total price of all line items.
Though i have maintained the header condition value in Sales Order Header its not displayed in SO output.
That is , I have a sales order and it has one HEADER condition type entered with 3500 USD.
In fact this value is used for some business purpose and is being printed on the sales order output for a specific output type.
But where as in a sales order this header condition value is not getting printed on the output though I am using same data as of the sales order which is having the header condition value printed on its output.
According to business,we must have the header condition value printed on sales Order output.
Please suggest how to proceed.
Thanks in advance.

Not sure if you are using costom smartform to print invoice, if yes then ask developer to debug and find the root cause and fix it.
You might need to give him condition when it shuld be printed and when not.
You can take reference of another output type for which it is printing

Header condition type should not be editable at item level

Hi gurus,
could you please help me with the following question.
Our requirement is to provide header discounts manually at header level which should not be editable at item level. So I've created condition type as Header condition.
When we manually add this condition at header level in Sales order, it is copied to the item level and is not editable there.
But after saving the SO, we find that the header discounts appearing at the item level becomes editable.
Kindly advice how to make the condition type as non-editable at item level.
Thanks in advance.
Sunny.

hi Sunny,
please check your condition type for discount in section 'Changes which can be made', wheather it used only for the header level or item level or both of it.
if you want to make the condition is not editable in item level, then you must made the condition type just for the header level.
beside changing the configuration in the condition type, you can protect it via BADI but it needs more programming.
if you insist to use the BADI, you can made the implementation of class CRM_ORDER_FIELDCHECK BADI
hopes it helps
cheers

RFQ - Header Condition (Not possible to determine a condition type)

Hi,
I have defined my own Condition Schema for RFQ Item Condition are working fine. But when i am trying to add header condition it is giving msg "Not possible to determine a condition type"
Regards

Hi,
I have defined my own Condition Schema for RFQ Item Condition are working fine. But when i am trying to add header condition it is giving msg "Not possible to determine a condition type" and now allowing me to enter the condition on header level.
Regards
Edited by: Kashif Ihsan on Jun 14, 2010 3:52 PM

How do I restore NOTES that were deleted during an itunes sync from Mac mini to iphone 5?

How do I restore NOTES that were deleted during an itunes sync from Mac mini to iPhone 5?

I should mention that my notes were not being sent to icloud, my mac's time machine was not set up, and my latest back-up was 3 months ago.
I know, I know, very silly on my part. I've changed all this going forward...

Can PO header condition not base on GR quantity?

Hi, friends
I have some questions about header conditions in PO.
In our business, we need one header surcharge based on GR value/quantity, and one another header discount which will be applied totally no matter how much the GR is.
For example, we have one PO, item is 20 eur / ea, PO quantity is 100 ea. Surcharge is 200 eur and the discount is 100 eur. Now if we only do GR with 40 ea, the surcharge is 200 * (40/100) = 80 eur, the discount is still 100 eur, so the total GR/IR is 40 *20 + 80 - 100 = 780.
Now I don't know how to configure those 2 header conditions. Maybe I can use HB00 for the surcharge. But for the discount, I tried to use HB01 Header Disc.(Value) , but I found that it is based on GR value.
Could you please tell me how to configure these two header conditions?
Or where to configure whether header condition is based on GR or item?
Thanks!
Wesley

Dear Wesely,
Conditions all are configured in PO only ,but it takes data from GR also,
I mean if your quantity is less or more in GR it is updated automatically in PO and you doing MIRO reference in PO only
so how much quantity is GR/IR is received that much quantity is billed only
one more imp is header conditions of PO is based on Vendor related ,The item conditions all are PO based conditions.
Hope this may helsp you
Prem.

GOA distribution to several contracts in r/3 not working

Hi,
I have a problem with GOA distribution to backend. I would like to obtain the situation when I have 2 items in GOA, in Distribution I have also two inputs (both for the same purchasing organization, but locations are different) and the GOA is distributed to R/3 to 2 different contracts - one for the first location and first item and the second contract for second item and location. I'm not able to get that working right.
Typically, does the SRM generate 2 different numbers for to r/3 contracts that were distributed from GOA?
I have GOA number 5600000150 and no matter how many items and locations (in Distribution) I indicate, there is always only one contract in r/3 is being created. When I indicate for instance 2 purchasing organizations in Distribution, there's only one contract in r/3 created for that first one.
Please help if you know what can be wrong.

Hi
Definitely, seems to be a bug in the system.
<b>Please go through the SAP OSS notes below, depending on your System release and support pack details -></b>
Note 648393 SRM: Distribution of global outline agreement conditions
1063593 Invalid price during contract generation in Backend
859049 SRM 5.0: Restrictions for uploading and downloading
1043517 Contract Upload: Purchasing Org. is getting lost
956190 GOA created in SRM3.0 cannot be released in higher relaeses
1042111 GOA status set to Distribution Incorrect wrongly
743221 Deleted price during contract generation in Backend system
656181 Release synchronization of releases on services
896187 Line Item Internal Note not transferred to R/3 contracts
942008 SRM Distribution of GOA to R/3 System: Scales missing
852469 Error in contract distribution with service items
954183 Contract price cut when GOA is distributed to backend system
979111 Erratic distribution on adding new item or distribution
781344 Deleted conditions on GOA in EBP do not update backend
1030307 Portal Information not maintained in customizing
1033458 Item level Tolerance values in GOA not transferred to R/3
1037623 Incorrect Error message for maintaining distribution entries
1028659 Missing contract number during the synchronization of releas
1025863 Wrong Currency code during GOA replication to R/3
897759 Allow transfer of global outline agreement
909516 SRM40/CTR:New line itm distribution flag cannot be unchecked
Note 847398 Incorrect determination of the EKGRP back end
P.S.: In SRM 6.0, hierarchies on GOA is not present. Better to get more details from SAP by creating a Customer OSS message as well.
Hope this will help.
Regards
- Atul

IMAP option to not delete from server OR recommend alternate mail app?

Using POP in Windows computer and IMAP on iphone.
In the iphone, POP has the opton to "delete from server: never"
There seems no way to accomplish this in the stock mail app when using IMAP ?
Using POP on the iphone is not an option due to the longstanding issue of the Apple mail apps not sending a proper termination signal back. The mailbox remains locked until the server times it out for inactivity and cleans up the stale lock after 10 minutes. The result is "wrong password" on the computer if it then tries to retrieve during that period. It's a feature of POP by design to use a lock to prevent corruption caused by simultaneous access to the mailbox. BUT, BB,Android,Windows all handle this correctly so that their POP transaction (and the mailbox lock) only lasts seconds! Only ever see this persistent lock with Apple mail clients
The user likes to keep his phone inbox clean, he will delete messages as he deals with them as well as messages he is postponing to deal with on computer later.
Moving messages to a 'later' folder won't help, as that 'later' folder will not be available thru POP (for the computer)
They also don't want to use IMAP on the computer because they don't want their communications stored on the server any longer than necessary.
Can anyone recommend:
- Windows IMAP client which downloads all and keeps a local copy of inbox which does not synch with server inbox.
- Alternate mail app for iphone which allows "delete from device only // never delete from server "

That's not how IMAP works. If you want to keep the inbox clean, but not delete the messages, create folders and move the messages into them for later review.

Empty Log files not deleted by Cleaner

Hi,
we have a NoSql database installed on 3 nodes with a replication factor of 3 (see exact topology below).
We run a test which consisted in the following operations repeated in a loop : store a LOB, read it , delete it.
store.putLOB(key, new ByteArrayInputStream(source),Durability.COMMIT_SYNC, 5, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
store.getLOB(key,Consistency.NONE_REQUIRED, 5, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
store.deleteLOB(key, Durability.COMMIT_SYNC, 5, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
During the test the space occupied by the database continues to grow !!
Cleaner threads are running but logs these warnings:
2015-02-03 14:32:58.936 UTC WARNING [rg3-rn2] JE: Replication prevents deletion of 12 files by Cleaner. Start file=0x0 holds CBVLSN 1, end file=0xe holds last VLSN 24,393
2015-02-03 14:32:58.937 UTC WARNING [rg3-rn2] JE: Cleaner has 12 files not deleted because they are protected by replication.
2015-02-03 14:32:58.920 UTC WARNING [rg3-rn1] JE: Replication prevents deletion of 12 files by Cleaner. Start file=0x0 holds CBVLSN 1, end file=0xe holds last VLSN 24,393
2015-02-03 14:32:58.921 UTC WARNING [rg3-rn1] JE: Cleaner has 12 files not deleted because they are protected by replication.
2015-02-03 14:32:58.908 UTC WARNING [rg3-rn3] JE: Replication prevents deletion of 12 files by Cleaner. Start file=0x0 holds CBVLSN 1, end file=0xe holds last VLSN 24,393
2015-02-03 14:32:58.909 UTC WARNING [rg3-rn3] JE: Cleaner has 12 files not deleted because they are protected by replication.
2015-02-03 14:33:31.704 UTC INFO [rg3-rn2] JE: Chose lowest utilized file for cleaning. fileChosen: 0xc (adjustment disabled) totalUtilization: 1 bestFileUtilization: 0 isProbe: false
2015-02-03 14:33:32.137 UTC INFO [rg3-rn2] JE: CleanerRun 13 ends on file 0xc probe=false invokedFromDaemon=true finished=true fileDeleted=false nEntriesRead=1129 nINsObsolete=64 nINsCleaned=2 nINsDead=0 nINsMigrated=2 nBINDeltasObsolete=2 nBINDeltasCleaned=0 nBINDeltasDead=0 nBINDeltasMigrated=0 nLNsObsolete=971 nLNsCleaned=88 nLNsDead=0 nLNsMigrated=88 nLNsMarked=0 nLNQueueHits=73 nLNsLocked=0 logSummary=<CleanerLogSummary endFileNumAtLastAdjustment="0xe" initialAdjustments="5" recentLNSizesAndCounts=""> inSummary=<INSummary totalINCount="68" totalINSize="7570" totalBINDeltaCount="2" totalBINDeltaSize="254" obsoleteINCount="66" obsoleteINSize="7029" obsoleteBINDeltaCount="2" obsoleteBINDeltaSize="254"/> estFileSummary=<summary totalCount="2072" totalSize="13069531" totalINCount="68" totalINSize="7570" totalLNCount="1059" totalLNSize="13024352" maxLNSize="102482" obsoleteINCount="66" obsoleteLNCount="971" obsoleteLNSize="12974449" obsoleteLNSizeCounted="971" getObsoleteSize="13019405" getObsoleteINSize="7347" getObsoleteLNSize="12974449" getMaxObsoleteSize="13019405" getMaxObsoleteLNSize="12974449" getAvgObsoleteLNSizeNotCounted="NaN"/> recalcFileSummary=<summary totalCount="2072" totalSize="13069531" totalINCount="68" totalINSize="7570" totalLNCount="1059" totalLNSize="13024352" maxLNSize="0" obsoleteINCount="66" obsoleteLNCount="971" obsoleteLNSize="12974449" obsoleteLNSizeCounted="971" getObsoleteSize="13019405" getObsoleteINSize="7347" getObsoleteLNSize="12974449" getMaxObsoleteSize="13019405" getMaxObsoleteLNSize="12974449" getAvgObsoleteLNSizeNotCounted="NaN"/> lnSizeCorrection=NaN newLnSizeCorrection=NaN estimatedUtilization=0 correctedUtilization=0 recalcUtilization=0 correctionRejected=false
Log files are not delete even if empty as seen using DBSpace utility:
Space -h /mam2g/data/sn1/u01/rg2-rn1/env/ib/kvstore.jar com.sleepycat.je.util.Db
File    Size (KB) % Used
00000000      12743       0
00000001      12785       0
00000002      12725       0
00000003      12719       0
00000004      12703       0
00000005      12751       0
00000006      12795       0
00000007      12725       0
00000008      12752       0
00000009      12720       0
0000000a      12723       0
0000000b      12764       0
0000000c      12715       0
0000000d      12799       0
0000000e      12724       1
0000000f       5717       0
TOTALS      196867       0
Here is the configured topology:
kv-> show topology
store=MMS-KVstore numPartitions=90 sequence=106
zn: id=zn1 name=MAMHA repFactor=3 type=PRIMARY
sn=[sn1] zn:[id=zn1 name=MAMHA] 192.168.144.11:5000 capacity=3 RUNNING
    [rg1-rn1] RUNNING
             single-op avg latency=4.414467 ms   multi-op avg latency=0.0 ms
    [rg2-rn1] RUNNING
             single-op avg latency=1.5962526 ms   multi-op avg latency=0.0 ms
    [rg3-rn1] RUNNING
             single-op avg latency=1.3068943 ms   multi-op avg latency=0.0 ms
sn=[sn2] zn:[id=zn1 name=MAMHA] 192.168.144.12:6000 capacity=3 RUNNING
    [rg1-rn2] RUNNING
             single-op avg latency=1.5670061 ms   multi-op avg latency=0.0 ms
    [rg2-rn2] RUNNING
             single-op avg latency=8.637241 ms   multi-op avg latency=0.0 ms
    [rg3-rn2] RUNNING
             single-op avg latency=1.370075 ms   multi-op avg latency=0.0 ms
sn=[sn3] zn:[id=zn1 name=MAMHA] 192.168.144.35:7000 capacity=3 RUNNING
    [rg1-rn3] RUNNING
             single-op avg latency=1.4707285 ms   multi-op avg latency=0.0 ms
    [rg2-rn3] RUNNING
             single-op avg latency=1.5334034 ms   multi-op avg latency=0.0 ms
    [rg3-rn3] RUNNING
             single-op avg latency=9.05199 ms   multi-op avg latency=0.0 ms
shard=[rg1] num partitions=30
    [rg1-rn1] sn=sn1
    [rg1-rn2] sn=sn2
    [rg1-rn3] sn=sn3
shard=[rg2] num partitions=30
    [rg2-rn1] sn=sn1
    [rg2-rn2] sn=sn2
    [rg2-rn3] sn=sn3
shard=[rg3] num partitions=30
    [rg3-rn1] sn=sn1
    [rg3-rn2] sn=sn2
    [rg3-rn3] sn=sn3
Why empty files are not delete by cleaner? Why empty log files are protected by replicas if all the replicas seam to be aligned with the master ?
java -jar /mam2g/kv-3.2.5/lib/kvstore.jar ping -host 192.168.144.11 -port 5000
Pinging components of store MMS-KVstore based upon topology sequence #106
Time: 2015-02-03 13:44:57 UTC
MMS-KVstore comprises 90 partitions and 3 Storage Nodes
Storage Node [sn1] on 192.168.144.11:5000    Zone: [name=MAMHA id=zn1 type=PRIMARY]    Status: RUNNING   Ver: 12cR1.3.2.5 2014-12-05 01:47:33 UTC Build id: 7ab4544136f5
        Rep Node [rg1-rn1]      Status: RUNNING,MASTER at sequence number: 24,413 haPort: 5011
        Rep Node [rg2-rn1]      Status: RUNNING,REPLICA at sequence number: 13,277 haPort: 5012
        Rep Node [rg3-rn1]      Status: RUNNING,REPLICA at sequence number: 12,829 haPort: 5013
Storage Node [sn2] on 192.168.144.12:6000    Zone: [name=MAMHA id=zn1 type=PRIMARY]    Status: RUNNING   Ver: 12cR1.3.2.5 2014-12-05 01:47:33 UTC Build id: 7ab4544136f5
        Rep Node [rg3-rn2]      Status: RUNNING,REPLICA at sequence number: 12,829 haPort: 6013
        Rep Node [rg2-rn2]      Status: RUNNING,MASTER at sequence number: 13,277 haPort: 6012
        Rep Node [rg1-rn2]      Status: RUNNING,REPLICA at sequence number: 24,413 haPort: 6011
Storage Node [sn3] on 192.168.144.35:7000    Zone: [name=MAMHA id=zn1 type=PRIMARY]    Status: RUNNING   Ver: 12cR1.3.2.5 2014-12-05 01:47:33 UTC Build id: 7ab4544136f5
        Rep Node [rg1-rn3]      Status: RUNNING,REPLICA at sequence number: 24,413 haPort: 7011
        Rep Node [rg2-rn3]      Status: RUNNING,REPLICA at sequence number: 13,277 haPort: 7012
        Rep Node [rg3-rn3]      Status: RUNNING,MASTER at sequence number: 12,829 haPort: 7013

Solved setting a non documented parameter " je.rep.minRetainedVLSNs"
The solution is described in NoSql forum:   Store cleaning policy

Item serial numbers are not sequence in GOA

Hello SDNers
i create a GOA for three items
01 10000001
02 20000001
03 30000003
now i am holding the contract and again i am negotiating the price with vendor and decided drop an idea for 20000001 so i delete a GOA for second item 02.
Existing Standard SRM
01 10000001
03 30000003
now we expect the below same rather than above.
We want
01 10000001
02 30000003
i can not say my business about bbp_pd concepts.I knew it is srm bug. created message too. Any solution for this?
br
Muthu

I knew it is srm bug.
Not really. The system is designed so that the deletion of items does not physically delete them from DB tables, but marking them with deletion indicator. One of the benefit of this design would be to re-instate the item should you need it in the future. The "undelete" function is already existing in some business object types in SRM. In your case, if you MUST have sequential item numbers, you could theoretically make it happen through implementation of BADI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI, where you physically remove the deleted item from DB tables and sort the item numbers without skipping.

Note 1479040 - Header Condition not deleted during GOA distribution

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for