NPROC:Dependent requirement not getting generated

Hi Experts,
We have an issue wherein we have Depedent requirement for a HALB material against FERT material requirement.But, the MD04 screen of HALB material doesn't show any Dependent requirement.
Infact, the MD04 screen of the FERT material shows NROC in the MRP element data for the given period.
NROC: It means that there are some errorneous components which were created by doing GR before a GI.
I had tried executing MF47 transaction(which is COGI equivalanet in REM scenario) for clearing the errorneous components.But, i got the error as "Deficit of BA Unrestricted use". So,it means that it shall use my current stock for post processing the error componenets, which ideally shouldn't been the case as the stock was already consumed.
Then, i found out that the BOM of FERT was not maintained.
So,just wanna know that coz BOM of FERT is not maintained & the HALB needs to be defined as a component in the BOM of FERT in this case?
or any other solution is there so that Depedent requirement for the HALB material reflects in MD04 screen.
What we want: The recurring NPROC requirement which is coming for the year 2009, 2010 should permanently vanish from MD04 screen.
Thanks,
Rishi
Edited by: Rishi. N. Khanduri on Jan 28, 2010 3:08 PM

Harendra,
Are you using "NETPL" as processing key for MD02? After 3 or 4 days is the dependent requirment getting created automatically or is it after MRP run again?
Please provide more details,
Regards,
Prasobh

Similar Messages

Proposals are not getting generated for BOM items in MD50

Hi Gurus,
I have maintained strategy 50 in MRP for header material , Item category gp as LUMF & maintained consumption parameters in material master .
For dependent requirements i have maintained BOM for production & sales usage, Strategy is blank as it is customer specific component , Item category gp is NORM , individual requirements i.e 1 in MRP 4 view.
MRP type is PD in both materials.
When i run a MRP thru' MD50 after getting customer order.
it is not planning my dependent requirements i.e. proposals are not getting generated for dependent requirements (BOM materials).
Please let me know the solution.
Thanx in advance
Regards,
Nagraj Vasmate

try to use strategy 20

PR not getting generated in MD50

hello,
anybody please help me.
My scenario is make to order for FG & SFG. make to stock for RM & Packing material.
MRP TYPE : PD
For FG & SFG: Individual Requirement
For RM & Packing material: collective requirement.
RM & Packing materil Stratergy group : 10
Avilability Check : 02 (individual check)
My problem is when i doing MRP run by using MD50, Purchase request are not getting generated for RM & Packing material when there is not stock, no po & No PR. in MD04 it showing dependent requirement. again when i am doing MRP run with MD02 pr getting generated. please suggest how to resolve this issue.
my client is asking to generate PR at MD 50 only.
Thanks & Regards
bhakta

MD50 is for sale order planning, system will plan with respect to sale order only - you are considered the RM and packaging as a MTS scenario, then how the system will plan for RM and Packaging in MD50
are you procuring raw material with respect to sale order means
then for RM and packaging, remove the strategy group and maintain individual indicator, then run MRP in MD50, system will plan for RM and pacakaging material also

Planned order not getting generated for FG

Dear Experts,
Planned orders not getting generated for the Finished Goods - X which is having MRP Type M0 - MPS fixing type strategy group 20 which is copied fron another FG - Y , its a new product and production plan has been updated through MC88 - Rough cut planning but the planned orders are not getting generated.
And for the material valid production version exists with selection method 3 and individullcollective as 1.
Please let me know what might be the possibalities and what all the key fields i need to check.
Thanks & Regards,
Sampath
Edited by: sampath s on Jul 13, 2011 11:31 AM

Dear,
In general MPS is run for High value items ( if you use like Gold , Platimum or A class items. ).
Always only single level is used for Explosion and planning. then only you can analyse the requirements at each stage before procurement.
Otherwise if you run MPS to multi level, Bottom most high value will be procured without any notice to authorities. Even you may cancel the process in mid way. At that time what will happen to the procured high value material.
So for that purpose only single item single level MPS concept is evolved.
Fo that you run MPS at single level so that only for the first level MPS will be carried out.
Check and revert back.\
Regards,
Alok Tiwari

Maintenance schedule is not getting generated

Hi....
Past one year, maintenance schedule is not getting generated.
Could you please let me know to where i have to look out for this problem in Equipment & Functional Locations?
What are all the fields will be mandatory and triggering the maintenance schedule / Notification in Equipment / Functional Locations?
Need your response at the earliest.
Regards,
Mohd Ali.

Hi
There May be several resons...
Check Whether Maintenace for perticualr maintenance plan is not scheduled... their could completion requirement tick might selected previous maint. not done for the equipment.
Check any scheduling for inactive equips/fl
check any long offset has been set....
check while scheduling any sortfield key is set or genral...if pertiucalr sort key is belong to Eq/fl which will not help
regards
krish

FI Doc not getting generated at the time of Asset GRN

Hi,
We have created Asset Purchase Order.
At the time of GRN, FI Doc is not getting generated.
What changes need to be required from MM side (in OBYC)
Regards,

HI PK,
whether your PO Item have Single Account Assignment or it is Multiple Account assignment.
Check Distribution in Accoun Assignment Tab at PO item level.
If it is Single account Assignment, then Accounting Document will be generated at GR where if it is Distributed then, no Accounting Document will be generated.
In your case, Probably it would be distributed. and as a result of this your PO Item is marked as 'GR non valuated'.
Check its Delivery Tab. If it is the case, then need not worry as it is std practise. system will treated it as multiple account assignment and its valuation will only be carried out Invoice Verification level.
Later on check the Material document also.
Pls Note:
If flag 'GR non-valuated' is set in the purchase order, the valuation is only executed through the invoice verification. This flag must be set if the purchase order has multiple account assignment.
A valuated goods receipt for a purchase order with account assignment generates a posting line for the consumption account 'Account-assigned purchase order' (KBS) and for the GR/IR clearing account WRX.
hope it address your issue.
Regards,
S Anand

CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE IDOC not getting generated for BUS_TRANS_MSG BDOC

Hello Experts,
In our project, we have a requirement to send custom fields in the BUS_TRANS_MSG to external system through XIF. The model of BDOC BUS_TRANS_MSG triggering IDOC CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M02 perfectly worked in the development system. We wanted to try the custom field extension in the Sandbox. So as per OSS note 916093, we have extended E101_CRMXIF_CUSTOMER_H segments with custom fields and tried generating the interfaces in BDFG transaction. While generation with IDOC CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M we got an error message "Incompatible change to complex data type
type E101CRMXIF_ISU_PRA1_X". So went about creating a custom IDOC ZZ_CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M02 for message CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE. Even for this config, the IDOC is not getting generated for the BDOCs. Lastly, configured the IDOC ZZ_CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M02 to a custom function module ZZ_BDFG_IDOC_TEST_FM. The FM got generated and activated, even then the IDOC is not generated for the BDOC.
SMOEAC config in Sandbox looks the same as the Development system. We do not the reason why IDOC is not getting generated and also the reason for error in BDFG while generating the interfaces after adding custom fields to CUSTOMER_H segment.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Partha

Hi Partha,
Kindly check the following thread.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/406efa7e-388a-2910-f9b8-81913b0ca57f?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
XIF adapter
Hope it answers your Query
Regards,
Srikanth.Naga

STPPOD.DELVRY03 idoc not getting generated

Dear Experts,
I have done the following settings for STPPOD.DELVRY03 but still idoc is not getting generated when i am posting goods reciept using VL32N
1) For Confirmation control key selected A-Always POD Relevant
2) For Item category ELN POD Relevant X and POD Automatic
SAP->Customizing Implementation Guide -> LogisticsExecution ->Shipping
->Deliveries ->Proof of Delivery ->Set POD-Relevance Depending on
Delivery Item Category
3) In Vendor Master the field "POD-Relevant" is assigned the value "A".
   4) In NACE settings
          Application:E1
          condition records & output type:OPOD
          Delivery type:EL
          Function:LS
4) In pratner profile
              Partner Type-->LS
              Partner Role --> blank)
               Message Type-->STPPOD
               Basic Type ->DELVRY03
              and under message control
              Application->E1
              Message Type
              Process code-->OPOD
Please suggest me if I am missing out on someting.
Thanks
Gaurav Gupta

Hi Gaurav,
Typically for STPPOD Idocs, the NACE and WE20 Settings are maintained at Vendor Level. Try changing your settings and see if it works.
Refer this link for further details : Re: STPPOD triggered sending wrong material from SAP to SNC
Thanks,
Bharath

Inspection lot not getting generated by Z inspection type

Hi,
I created a inspection type Z1 , copying the inspection type 01. I guess I maintained all the required configurations or conditions.
I maintained the inspection type Z1 in the QM view of a material with status Active, but I am not able to do MIGO, neither the stock type is coming as Quality Inspection automatically in both the Purchse Order creation and MIGO. As a reslut, the inspection lot is not getting generated.
I am also not able to create a manual lot but QA01, Its giving error as "Inspection type Z1 not maintained for material X" .
Thanks in advance for your valuable suggestions.
Regards
Kunal

Dear check preffered inspection type in material master QM view and do the GRN.
Check and Revert.
Cheers
KK

Spool not getting generated in OO ALV report

Hi,
I developed a report in which we are giving output in same selection screen through OO ALV.
But,when we are scheduling that report in background,spool is not getting generated.
Waiting for your reply.
BR,
Praveen

Hi Aparna,
I tried NEW-PAGE PRINT ON.
I am pasting source code extract below:
   IMPORT DATA = ME->IT_FINAL2 FROM MEMORY ID SY-CPROG.
    FREE MEMORY ID SY-CPROG.
    CHECK ME->IT_FINAL2 IS NOT INITIAL.
    CHECK LO_DOCK IS INITIAL.
    CREATE OBJECT LO_DOCK
      EXPORTING
        REPID = SY-REPID
        DYNNR = SY-DYNNR
        RATIO = 70
        SIDE = CL_GUI_DOCKING_CONTAINER=>DOCK_AT_BOTTOM
        NAME = 'DOCK_CONT'.
    IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
      MESSAGE 'Error in Docking Control' TYPE 'S'.
    ENDIF.
    IF LO_ALV IS INITIAL.
      TRY.
          LO_CONT ?= LO_DOCK.
          CALL METHOD CL_SALV_TABLE=>FACTORY
            EXPORTING
              LIST_DISPLAY   = IF_SALV_C_BOOL_SAP=>FALSE
              R_CONTAINER    = LO_CONT
              CONTAINER_NAME = 'DOCK_CONT'
            IMPORTING
              R_SALV_TABLE   = LO_ALV
            CHANGING
              T_TABLE        = ME->IT_FINAL2.
        CATCH CX_SALV_MSG.
      ENDTRY.
CLEAR LR_COLUMN.
      TRY.
          LR_COLUMNS = LO_ALV->GET_COLUMNS( ).
          LR_COLUMN = LR_COLUMNS->GET_COLUMN( 'KSCHL' ).
          LR_COLUMN->SET_LONG_TEXT( 'Cond.Type' ).
CATCH CX_SALV_NOT_FOUND.
      ENDTRY.
NEW-PAGE PRINT ON.
        LO_ALV->DISPLAY( ).
        NEW-PAGE PRINT OFF.
I am not getting spool list while executing it in background.
BR,
Praveen

MC.9 - spool is not getting generated

Hi Experts,
When i execute MC.9 transaction in foreground i am able to view the report output. but when i execute it in background spool is not getting generated.
Please provide me any solution for this issue.
Thanks
Pallavi

Hi
I have checked list of versions in the 'select version' button. But my question is when i select 'execute in background', it is not generated spool. Is there any relation between spool and version. If there is, please explain me what it mean and how it relates.
As i am new to this module i wanted to know it, in brief detailed.
Thanks
Pallavi

Transportation lane KEY not getting generated in the table

Transportation lane KEY not getting generated in the table
Hi folks,
The issue is like this :
We have a weekly workorders upload program from legacy systems to SAP-APO. The legacy planners send a .CSV file containing material-wise workroders. A customised zee program picks these quantities & writes them in Prod.planned keyfigures in SNP planning book. This process is done for the manufacturing locations only.
Lately workorders for two particular material M1 & M2 had failed to get upload. It gives the error 'NO VALID SOURCE OF SUPPLY COULD BE FOUND' in its Job log. We did some debugging & found that for successful materials the TRPID is getting generated in the table /SAPAPO/V_TRPROD whereas this TRPID is missing for M1 & M2. Why this is happening is our main concern. We tried deleting the PPM & creating this again, assuming that the PPMID is the precursor for generating this TRPID, but this yielded no results.
____ for successful upload______________
se16 --> /SAPAPO/V_TRPROD
Version = 000
LOCTO = LOCID KEY for manufacturing location
MATID = MATID KEY of successfully loaded workorder
Enter
This gives the following results
TRPID = TRPID KEY
LOCFR = LOCID KEY for manufacturing location
LOCTO = LOCID KEY for manufacturing location
MATID = MATID KEY for successfully loaded workorder
( This seems a self-lane, i.e both TO & FROM location are same)
____ for unsuccessful upload________
se16 --> /SAPAPO/V_TRPROD
Version = 000
LOCTO = LOCID KEY for manufacturing location
MATID = MATID KEY for unsuccessfully loaded workorder
Enter
This gives the following results
Error = No Table entries found for specified KEYS
We are perplexed why this TRPID is not getting generated for these two particular material M1 & M2?
We have deleted their PPM & re-created them to cross-check if the PPMID KEY is the trigger for generating the TRPID key. This didn't work!
Please let us know in case someone faced a similar issue.
Many Thanks.
Kumar
Edited by: Blue Lotus on Jun 9, 2011 2:44 PM

Yes Anand.
We deleted the PPM & created it again, which didn't work.
Later on we deleted the product itself from APO & re-CIFed it from R3 & then re-created the PPM.
The PPMID which was missing earlier is now getting created! However no luck with the TRPID.
Why this TRPID is not getting generated in our only concern
Regards
Kumar

Schedule lines are not getting generated during MRP Run

Schedule lines are not getting generated during MRP Run. I have maiantained source list for the material with proper validity date and also maintained scheduling agreement . MRP relevvant Indicator , I have marked - 2 which means -Record relevant to MRP. Sched. lines generated automatically.
Still I am not able to get schedule lines and instead of that *Purchase Requisitions* are getting generated.
Can any one help me and suggest me what to be done in this case .
Thanks & Regards ,
Nirmalya

Dear,
Welcome to SDN,
In transaction OMDT you have to enable the indicator create schedule lines
In MD02 MRP control Prameter here select the Delivery schedules -3- Schedule line. Processing Key as NETCH and Planning Mode - 3 delted and recreated.
Maintain source list ME01, in that put MRP indicator as '2' i.e. schedule lines via MRP.Put your agreement no in that.
If u run MRP properly u will get schedule lines automatically in ME38.
Make the schedule agreement, make it source relevent in the source list make is FIX and MRP indicator as 3.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

TDS reversal entry is not getting generated at time of F-54

Dear All,
I have made down payment request through F-47 transaction code and down payment made by Transaction code u2013F110 (instead of F-48) and TDS is deducted at this point. There after I made invoice through MIRO / F-43 in which TDS is again deducted for whole invoice amount. I have cleared down payment through T.code F-54. But at this time TDS reversal entry is not getting generated and only customer account is credited and debited.
So in short TDS is getting deducted at time down payment and at time of Invoice for their respective full value.
Note: For TDS type on payment I have selected u201CCentral Invoice PROPu201D and we are not using business place and section code. Please help me.
Appreciate all expertsu2019 help ASAP.
Thanks ,
Manas kumar

Hai Manas,
If ur not using business place how can u get remitance chalana thats why first u can configure the business plance. I think ur already posted some entries its correct? In this case u will run this t.code business place update the previous entries i.e., J1INPP this is very useful to u
Regards
Madhu I

Task activities not getting generated properly in BPEL

I am using the Jdev 11g TP3 (from OTN). Installation went through fine. However I observed a interesting issue with HumanTask/BPEL and I was wondering if someone faced similar such problems before, if so, how to rectify the issue. Here is the description of the issue:
1. Created a Empty SOA composite project
2. Dragged and dropped BPEL Process in the component palette. Designed a Asynchronous process.
3. Dragged and dropped a HumanTask. Did not expose as an composite. Designed a single approver workflow. In the project schema, choose the schema from BPEL input.
4. Wired BPEL to HumanTAsk
5. In the BPEL flow, I dragged the HumanTask to the flow. Everything appears to be correct. I clicked on "Ok" after associating with BPEL variable.
Now when I examine the BPEL flow, a scope before the BPEL switch is empty. There are no BPEL activities generated. This is a very simple case of BPEL and HumanTask and I am not sure as to why the tasks not getting generated properly in BPEL flow.
Has anyone experienced this issue or any ideas as to why this could happen?

After going through the exercise several times, I finally found out the reason as to why the BPEL activities are not getting generated. In the Human task form for the title, since it is a fixed string in my case I put something like the one given below:
Title : "APPROVE ORDER"
When you have fixed string within double quotes it does not generate BPEL activities correctly. You can try and u will see the problem.
My real question is should not throw proper error message when you try to drag and drop the HumanTask to BPEL flow.

NPROC:Dependent requirement not getting generated

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for