Number Range RF_Beleg has reached critical limit

Hi
While doing the customer clearing in AR , I got the error as "Number Range RF_Beleg has reached critical limit ". Can anybody suggest me how to fix this error.it looks some allocated number range has exhausted.
Thanks
SN

Hi Sathya,
You may have to follow the following steps:
i) You may know the document type of the document that generates this error, say DZ, Pls goto OBA7 and note the Number Range defined for the same.
ii) Having noted the Number Range, goto FBN1. Click on the Change Status Button.
iii) Locate the Co Code, Fiscal Year and the Number Range (That u got from Step i). Select that line and change the current number to zero.
iv) Come back to the main screen of FBN1. Again click onto the Change Interval Button. Select the same record as in iii) and change the From & To Numbers. The defined numbers should not overlap with any other number range for any other document type.
v)Save it.
Try posting again.
Hope this helps.

Similar Messages

Creative Cloud Membership has reached its limit for hosted sites

I have had a paid Adobe Muse Creative Cloud membership for about 2 years now, and only used one website. I understand I can host up to 5. But for some reason when I try to launch a new site, I am told my membership has reached its limit for hosted sites. Can someone please tell me if I have some test pages I'm hosting (or something) and how I can erase them so I can make room for my new site. These are only personal sites so I do not need a business catalyst url for testing. I have the two domains active now and just need to be able to have both go live.
My email is [email protected]
The web page I'm trying to launch is www.ninetiesband.com. The only site that should be active right now is www.wearenightsbridge.com.
Thank you for any help you can provide.
-Mickey

Hello Mickey,
I checked your subscription details, and it looks like you're subscribed to Adobe Muse single app subscription, and not Creative Cloud subscription. When you sign up for Muse single app subscription (yearly), you get one free site to host with Business Catalyst. You only get 5 sites when you have a full Creative cloud subscription.
Cheers
Parikshit

Why am I getting a "Adobe Creative Cloud Membership has reached its limit for hosted sites" message?

I just tried to push my FIRST "free" Creative Cloud site live and got the message "Your Adobe Creative Cloud Membership has reached its limit for hosted sites. To push this site live you will need to purchase an additional hosting plan." I thought CC membership was supposed to give you 5 free hosted web basics sites?
I am a premium BC partner and so far have my partner site and a paid Webcommerce site . In addition to the site I'm trying to put live I have 2 other trial sites (think they are designated as WebMarketing sites) of which one is expired. So where does the limit come in as this is so far my only WebBasics site?
Please help as I need this live urgently (without additional expense).

Hi Judy
Appologies for this un-answered post, if any related issue is still active please reach out to our support directly.

Cloud Membership has reached its limit for hosted sites.

I have a full subscriptin to the cloud but when I try to push my new Muse site live Iget the following error: "Your Adobe Creative Cloud Membership has reached its limit for hosted sites." After much research I have kind of figured out that when I upgraded my trial version of Muse only to a paid version of the Adobe Cloud, the system may think I am still a trial member. I sent in a ticket but three says later it's still not fixed. Anyone one else had this issue?

I have only ever used one email address. [email protected] I'm not sure why it would should that I have even used one site since I have never published a website live. I have only played around with 3 different sites... all of which should still be temporary. The site I am trying to push live right now is outsidetheveil.com.

I need to log into my icloud account but it has reached its limit can i reset this ?

i cannot get my icloud account on my device it says it has reached its maximum amount of account

No, that cant be reset. You won't be able to create a new account using that device. Your only options are to either re-use one of the accounts previously created on it, or create a new account using a different iOS device or Mac, if you have one.

E bay app has reached the limit

Hi does anyone using the Ebay app in the UK know anything about the USERS LIMIT when i try and sign in i get this message coming up users limit has been reached i hope this is a bug or it is a usless app

no idea. i dont use it myself. might get more response in the app forum though:
http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=1280

Does AD member group count has a critical limit in OAM?

Hi,
I’m using Oracle Access Manager 10g (10.1.4.0.1) to setup an SSO system. The user base is an instance of Microsoft Active Directory 2003. I’m authorizing a particular URL (which is defined as a Policy Domain in OAM) for the users based on user groups defined in the Active Directory.
I’ll explain my problem using this example. Suppose the URL I’ve setup is http://www.example.com/test. Therefore, ‘/test’ is defined as a Policy Domain in OAM. Within this policy domain, I have two (enabled) authorization rules namely, Rule-A (allows access to the AD group, Group-A) and Rule-B (allows access to the AD group, Group-B). Then, under ‘Default Rules’ I have defined the authorization expression as, Rule-A | Rule-B.
In the AD, Group-A has 500 member groups and Group-B has 1900 member groups. (User accounts are members of these sub-groups). Let us suppose that there is a user account called User-A as a member of a sub-group under Group-A, and User-B under Group-B likewise. My problem is, that when access is tested for the above URL through the ‘OAM Access Tester’, User-A is authorized but User-B is shown as “Inconclusive”. Is this related to some member group count limitation in OAM? I would be really grateful if anybody can help me.
By the way please note that, I’ve already changed the value of the parameter “maxForRangedMemberRetrieval” to 1500 in \IdentityServer_install_dir\identity\oblix\apps\common\bin\globalparams.xml, as suggested in OAM documentation.
Regards,
Asanka Gallege.
Edited by: ASGALK on Nov 6, 2008 11:30 AM

Originally Posted by dkitzen
Hi Thomas,
Thanx for the quick reply.
Is it posible to edit the LDAP request in ZCM, like explained below?
To perform a search where the result might exceed this number of objects, the client (ZCM) must specify the paged search control. This is to group the returned results in groups that are no larger than the MaxPageSize value.
Greetings,
Dennis.
Not that I'm aware of, you need to increase the MaxPageSize value of your AD.
Thomas

Number range interval exceeds

Dear All,
when i try to post document in the no. range which has only the balance of 400 documents,it is showing the warning message: number range RF_BELEG has reached the critical limit but i want to control this message only for last 100 documents.In SPRO where can i do this config.
points will be rewarded for the relevant answer.
thanks,
venkata hemanth

Hi Hemanth R,
Goto SNRO:-
enter your object ( for eg: FIAA-BELNR -Number range for asset accounting documents)
maintain warning percentage -
this field is used wen- Percentage of numbers remaining in a number range, upon reaching which in number assignment a warning is given.
wen you reach the critical limit ( percentage of this) you will get warning messages.
hope it helps

Number Range Error in Invoice posting in FI.

Dear friends,
I have copied F2 and created another Billing Document Type. A seperate number range series has also been maintained and has been defined in the newly created Billing document type.
At the time of saving and posting the Invoice with the newly created number range, system is throwing an error and disallowing the document to get posted, till the time the number range is not maintained in the series specified, from "9000000000 to 9999999999".
Once I am changing the number series in the billing document and maintaining the standard, system is allowing the document to get posted.
Can anybody help me with a solution, where I can use my newly created number series in any newly created billing document type.
Rgds,
Indrajit

Hi indrajit,
There is standard setting in accounting document number range so that the accounting document number is same as you billing document number.
Check you accounting document type .
Goto transaction FBKP and see the number range assigned to the accounting document type.
Goto SNRO and give objed RF_BELEG and the series maintaines for the accountion type, if external tick is on the the systems assigns same number.
for this to happen your billing document number range should fall within the range specified for accounting document.
Regards
Rasik Waghela

Inspection lot number ranges skipping

My inspection lot number ranges are skipping, those are std number ranges like 01 origin, 04 origin etc, what could be the reason for that.
Inspn lots are getting generated and I took UD also. But certain numbers in the range got skipped.
Eg:- Incoming inspn lot 010000000041 then it comes 010000000045
Lot numbers 01/42, 01/43, 01/44 does not exist in sytem.
Please suggest a way out
Thanks
Vineeth
Edited by: vineeth varghese on Jul 18, 2008 11:31 AM

Craig,
But expert suggestion says, not to switch off buffer thru SNRO as it may affect fuctionality as you said early in this discussion.
But I believe, this is to be relooked by SAP as number range skipping is not good (My case its skipping 5-7 numbers at a time). But I am not convinced with the reply from SAP also.
Anyway thanks to you craig for your advice.
SAP Note on this matter for reference of all. Thanks
================================
Note: 62077
Summary
Symptom
Gaps (jumps) occur when allocating internal numbers.
The status of the number range interval does not match the number that was last assigned.
The number assignment does not reflect the insert sequence.
IMPORTANT: Read Notes 504875 and 678501.
Other terms
Document number, number range, number range object, buffering, current number level, trip number assignment, number interval, CO document, CO actual posting, inspection lot, material document, physical inventory document, production order number, planned order number, process order number, maintenance order number
FB01, VF01, KO88, KE21, KE11, FD01, FK01, XK01, XDN1, MB01, MB0A, MB11, MB1A, MB1B, MB1C, MB31, KANK, KB11, KB13, KB14, KB41, KB43, KB44, KB21, KB23, KB24, KB31, KB33, KB34, KB51, KB53, KB54, PR01, PR02, PR03, PR04, PR05, XD01, VD01, MK01, SNUM, SM56, SNRO, VL01, VL02, CO01, CO40, CO41, VA01, MR1M, MIRO
Reason and Prerequisites
A large number of number range objects are buffered. When the system buffers a number range object, it does not update numbers individually in the database but reserves a preset group of numbers (depending on the number range object) in the database the first time a number is requested, and makes these numbers available to the application server in question. The following numbers can then be taken directly from the application server buffer. New numbers are not used in the database until the application server buffer has been used up.
The effects described under "Symptom" are a direct consequence of this:
If an application server is shut down, the numbers that are left in the buffer (that is, that are not yet assigned) are lost. As a result, there are gaps in the number assignment.
The status of the number range interval reflects the next free number that has not yet been transferred to an application server for intermediate buffering. The current number level therefore does not display the number of the "next" object.
The current number level (for each server) can be displayed using Transaction SM56. Call transaction SM56 and choose the menu 'Goto' -> 'Entries'. In the dialog box, enter the client, the affected number range object (for example, RK_BELEG) and possibly the required subobject (corresponds to the controlling area for the object RK_BELEG).
If you use several application servers, the numerical sequence will not reflect the (chronological) insert sequence because the numbers are buffered separately on the individual hosts.
Buffering the number range objects has a positive effect on performance, because the system no longer has to access the database (number range table NRIV) for each posting. Furthermore, a serialization of this table (database locking) is prevented to a large extent so that posting procedures can be carried out in parallel.
Solution
Since number range buffering does not cause any expressly assured qualities to be lost, no correction is required.
If you still require continuous allocation, you can deactivate the number range buffering specifically for individual objects.
Proceed as follows:
- Start Transaction SNRO and enter the affected object.
- Choose 'Change'.
- Deactivate buffering: Choose 'Edit' -> 'Set Up Buffering' -> 'No Buffering'.
- If you want to change the buffer size only, enter the corresponding value in the field 'No. of numbers in buffer'.
- Save the changes.
Please note that this change is a modification. The modification is overwritten as soon as the affected number range object is redelivered - in other words, you must check the change manually each time you import a release.
In particular, read Note 678501, bearing in mind that changing the buffering type - if not explicitly recommended by SAP - constitutes a modification. For other possible solutions, refer to the following notes:
179224, 599157 and 840901.
For the the following number range objects, gaps may cause users to have doubts since they are 'expecting' a sequential numbering:
Area CO:
- RK_BELEG   (CO Document)
CAUTION: Note that the problems described in Notes 20965 and 29030 may occur if you deactivate buffering.
- COPA_IST (Document number in actual posting)
- COPA_PLAN (Document number in planned posting)
- COPA_OBJ   (Profitability segment number)
Area FI:
- DEBITOR    (Customer master data)
- KREDITOR   (Vendor master data)
Area HR:
- RP_REINR (Trip numbers)
Area PM, PP, PS
- AUFTRAG    (Order number, production, process, maintenance order, network number)
- QMEL_NR    (Number range - message)
Area MM:
- MATBELEG   (Material documents)
- MATERIALNR (Material master)
Area QM:
- QLOSE      (Inspection lots in QM)
- QMEL_NR    (Number range - message)
- QMERK      (Confirmation number)
- QMERKMALE (Master inspection characteristics in QSS)
- QMERKRUECK (Confirmation number of an inspection characteristic in QM results processing)
- QMETHODEN (Inspection methods in QM)
- ROUTING_Q (Number ranges for inspection plans)
- QCONTROLCH (Quality control chart)
Area Workflow:
- EDIDOC     (IDocs)
Number range buffering can be activated or deactivated at any time.
Number range objects that have to be continuous due to legal specifications (for example, RF_BELEG, RV_BELEG), or due to a corresponding application logic must not be buffered using the buffering type 'Main memory buffering'. See also Notes 37844 (for RF_BELEG) and 23835 (for RV_BELEG).
Header Data
Release Status: Released for Customer
Released on: 10.07.2007 12:57:00
Priority: Recommendations/additional info
Category: Consulting
Primary Component: BC-SRV-NUM Number Range Management
Secondary Components: CA-GTF General Application Functions
BC-SRV-ASF-UOM Unit Management
CO Controlling
CO-OM-CCA Cost Center Accounting
CO-OM-CCA-A Master Data
CO-PA Profitability Analysis
FI Financial Accounting
FI-AP Accounts Payable
FI-AR Accounts Receivable
FI-GL General Ledger Accounting
FI-TV Business Trip Management
LO-MD-MM Material Master
MM Materials Management
MM-IM Inventory Management
MM-IM-PI Physical Inventory
PM Plant Maintenance
PP Production Planning and Control
QM Quality Management
QM-PT Quality Planning
QM-QN Quality Notifications
Edited by: viny on Jul 23, 2008 9:18 AM

Number range issue -urgent

Hi ,
     We are transferring master data from one system to another system. Since there would be clash of number ranges , we want to make number range as manual ( i.e. external ) for a given master data type.
Since we don't want to do it manually , is there some function module which can do this and again redo this .
Regards,
Divyanshu

hi divyanshu,
As Neil ,Patrick and Amit said it would be better if u take the resource help of a Functional consultant .
Moving   master data from one system to another system , yeah obviously there will be a clash for number ranges if not now in future it may arise .
Are u trying to reverse(master data) the procedure from Production data to Testing system or vice versa? U didnt mention that whether its a table or whatever stuff it is .
The process is we set define the number range in SNRO say I defined ZXXX . The range is 000000000000001 to 999999999999999999 unique to a system .
say I have generated 2000 numbers for a process under a ZXXX in development system , the same object now when run in Testing may be different , now in production that will vary as well this is the criteria.
so if u r trying to move the data then u need to map the appropriate number as this may be a primary key/Foreign key in the field for some tables say Ztables if u have in this scenario.
Function module Number_get_next   is used to generate the next number . Say like I had 10000002456 as my last number then when I want to see my next sequence then it has to start from 10000002457 so this fm does that.
Dont look for a Function module as of now, just check the values what u want to move , with proper fixes .
As per rules plz dont use the word Urgent .
forgot to add..
a number range usually is very critical as we maintain that number for a unique combination so if its a primary key then dont depend on do redo process by an fm .
Regards,
vijay
Message was edited by: Kan vijay

Clear Vendor Down Payment F-54, Number range

Hi Experts
I tried to clear the vendor down payment using the T-Code; F-54, It is displaying a error message as "Number Range 17 is Missing for the year 2010"
Message no. F5150
Diagnosis
The document type you specified has been allocated to a number range in fiscal year "2010" that has not been created.
- Should we need to create a New Number range for this document type.
- Is this a New requirement in ECC 6.0?
- Is this linked to the New GL feature?
Please share your views.
With Regards
Siva

Hi,
The document type you are using is referring to number range maintained with the id 17. You need to go to FBN1 transaction code and maintain a number range for id 17 for the year 2010.
Normally the accounting document number ranges are maintained year specific so that every new fiscal year will restart at 1 and not continue from last year.
As corrected by Ramnuja, you need to maintain number ranges for entry view and general ledger view (new GL feature).
For you the number range 17 has not been maintianed for 2010 and you need to maintain it.
hope this helps.
thanks and regards,
anit
Edited by: Anit Mangat on Nov 23, 2010 4:56 PM

Number Range assignment to Org plan/model

Hi,
have a question on number ranges w.r.t Org plan.
in CRM 5.0, my number assignment is independent of all plan versions (maintained 'X' in t.code OONC).
Now I want to create a new number range and assign it to the new org model/plans that I will be creating - how do I do it.
I could define the new number range but am not sure how to assign this to the org plan. If I explain it the other way, how does the Org plan determine which number range it has to use ?
will reward points.
thanks
kumar

Thanks Robin for your response. I did reward points to you. Its useful to understand HRALX-OSUBG function.
I did assign the new number range id here as per your message and saved but when I try to create the new Org model/plan, it still takes my old range - is there any dependency as well that I need to change?
One more observation, on the same table T77S0, I have the value '1' for HRALX-ONUMB.
I changed HRALX-ONUMB to '2' and then maintained HRALX-OSUBG with the Z1 number range (custom), but still my Org model determines the old number range?
Could you suspect something?
thanks
Kumar

Subject: Number Range interval deleted automatically

Hi
At the time of Accounting Document Posting system is giving error message for maintaining number ranges interval for the corresponding Number Ranges (For example: 50, 51, 49, 19) for the fiscal year 2010. But Number range interval has already been maintained in the Tcode FBN1 for the fiscal year 2010.
After maintaining Number range interval again for the corresponding number range in Tcode FBN1, when we are trying to post accounting document system is again giving one error message that document number (5000000000) is already been used. When we are looking into Tcode FBN1 the current number status is 0.
So to resolve this problem we have to provide the Number range status into FBN1 manually (suppose if 10 doc are already existing in the system for number range 50 then we have enter the number range 5000000010 manually in FBN1).
After Number range status setting in FBN1 System is allowing to post the Accounting Document.
Along with this one more issue is appearing related to MM posting period.
The current posting period in the system is 08/2010 and the initial period in the system is 08/2007. System is automatically going back to the initial posting period 08/2007. After opening the Posting Period with Tcode MMPV we can post the document only.
Both Issues are appearing repeatedly.
Plese help
Thanks..
BRSR

Dear If you have already maintained number range for particular period then again for same period and series system should not allow to maintain but as you said above it is allowed so i feel it was not done correctly first time and the given series number could have already been used so when changed the current number in status it's working fine.
For MM posting period issue please check transactions MMRV,OMSY,OMWD with your MM consultant
Cheers
KK
Edited by: kiran kumar on Oct 19, 2010 8:32 PM

External Document Number Range

Dear Forum,
We have an issue with the Document Number Range that has been defined in the system, according to which the document numbering is automatic. When the users post the entries for audit adjustments in the back date, the numbers jump, which becomes an audit issue. However, to resolve this the users want the externally controlled document number range, so that they have the option to chose the manual numbers. Another problem is that we are using the ledgers 0L as well as 1L, while the entries are posted in the leading ledger 0L, the same get replicated in the non leading ledger 1L and we want the external document number range in the non leading ledger 1L also.
Your prompt help would be highly appreciated as to how can we resolve the same.
Regards

Hi Dianne,
Your advice is quite helpful. I have one more confusion. The fiscal year for the leading ledger 0L is calender year and for the non leading ledger 1L is the year from April to March. Thus period 03 for 0L corresponds to period 12 of 1L. Therefore, to keep the 'external document numbers' same in 0L and 1L, would the following be corect way, say for year 2010 -
0L Year 2010 (Calender Year Jan to Dec) - External Doc nos. From 01 to 1000
1L Year 2009 (April'09 to Mar'10) - External Document nos. From 01 to 1000
Thus if the audit adjustmnets are posted on 31 March, 2010 with document no with 001 in 0L, it would appear with same document no. 001 in 1L on 31 March, 2010. In ledger 0L it will be in period 3, but in ledger 1L it will be in period 12.
Would really appreciate your help.
Regards,

Number Range RF_Beleg has reached critical limit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for