Numbering Scheme for Legal Regulations

When we assign the same Numbering Scheme(1 scheme) to more than 2 legal regulations,
we cannot have more than 2 Export Control Classification Numbers in GTS material master.
（We cannot have more than 2 ECCNs for 1 item.）
We customize bellow,
(Legal Regulation) JPACT1-(Numbering Scheme) JPECCN1
(Legal Regulation) JPACT2-(Numbering Scheme) JPECCN1
(Legal Regulation) JPACT3-(Numbering Scheme) JPECCN1
In this case, we cannnot have different Numbers for 1 item, if we have below,
(Item) GTS10000-(ECCN) 1A001
(Item) GTS10000-(ECCN) 2A001
(Item) GTS10000-(ECCN) 3A001
->2A001,3A001 changes 1A001.
If we have different ECCNs for 1 item, do we divide Numbering Scheme?
(Legal Regulation) JPACT1-(Numbering Scheme) JPECCN1
(Legal Regulation) JPACT2-(Numbering Scheme) JPECCN2
(Legal Regulation) JPACT3-(Numbering Scheme) JPECCN3
If you know another ideas, could you tell me the way.
Regards,
Naoya Kaneda.

Hi,
Iam little confused as to why you want to assign 2 or more ECCN's to one product.
Multiple products with identical features and attributes can be assigned to the same ECCN's but what is the use of doing vice versa.
I know of a concept called set numbers. Number sets enable you to group tariff numbers from several numbering schemes together. You can then assign a set to a product or multiple products to classify that product with multiple tariff numbers at the same time, to simplify the classification process.
This not only allows cross-country grouping of tariff numbers but also cross application grouping. If you use several areas of SAP Global Trade Services, such as SAP Compliance Management and SAP Customs Management and SAP Risk Management for your import and export processing, you can group the numbering schemes for the relevant number types together in a set.
Regards
Vivek

Similar Messages

Assign Scheme for Numbers in Legal Control not appering in number schemes

Hi,
Assing Scheme for numbers in legal control level is not appearing in Assign Numbering Schemes to legal Regulations of the application at number schems. Please check attached screen shot.
Thanks and Regards,
Alihamed.sa

Hi Alihamed,
Maybe that feature wasn't included in the early GTS 10.0 shipment? You really ought to apply the Support Packages (SP19 is now available).
But take a look in table VCLSTRUC (using Transaction SE16), and see what entries you find with VCLNAME = /SAPSLL/VC_CTS_LGREG. The one you're interested in is PREDOBJECT = /SAPSLL/V_TLU9LD. If it's not already assigned, see if it's available in the drop-down list.
If that entry is available, you could try adding it to the assignments, and see if that solves the problem.
Otherwise you should still be able to configure by adding entries to view /SAPSLL/V_TLU9LD using Transaction SM30.
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Dave

ECCN Numbering Scheme Assignment

Hi,
When you have defined numbering scheme(NS) for ECCN for exports
what is use of assignment to
1. Assignment NS of Export List to License management
2. Assignment NS of Export List to Legal Control
I understand 1st one for license determination but what is the 2nd assignment used for? In Help both have same description
Can anybody guide me?
Thanks,

Hi Kiran,
Yes you are right, this is not properly explained in Help.
First one is for license maintenance i.e. You have defined a numbering scheme for each of the legal regulations with which you maintain ECCN's in the licenses and in the
customs product master.
Second one i.e assignment of numbering scheme to Legal Control is for license determination. Because license determination tables contain the attribute Export Control Classification Number.It is important to determine the relevant license type at control class and legal regulation level
Regards
Vivek Nair

Numbering schema in Product Hierarchy reg

Hello Experts,
We are implementing CRM 7.0, as part of the initial load we had downloaded DNL_CUST_PROD1 from ECC. But after replication we came to know that the numbering schema for Product Hierarchy is not 5,5,8 but changed to something else. When I tried doing the changes to numbering scheme, it is giving some error.
We havenu2019t created any Products or any master or transactional data.
Can you please help me in understanding how to change the numbering scheme and re-do the intial load.
Thank you.
KK

you missed to save it .
Dont maintain node 1 , 2 and 3 in one go.
Maintain your 1s then save, maintain your 2s then save, then maintain your 3rd level.

How to change scene numbering schema

Is it possible to change the numbering schema for scenes? For example a sitcom with scene letters A-L or including episode number with scene number like 1.1-1.35 and 2.1-2.25? I'm a new user and so far all I see is automatic numbering 1-10.
Thanks!

Hi,
You can easily assign custom scene numbers to a scene by simply clicking on that scene number.
Now for 1.1-1.35 and 2.1-2.25 as scene numbers, Go to the first scene of that episode (say episode 1)and click on the scene number. Assign the custom number as 1.1 to that scene and click 'OK' . Now go to 'Production->Manage Scene Numbers' and check 'Automatically assign number to new scenes'. Now subsequent scenes will have scene numbers as '2.2,2.3,2.4......' .
So simply provide a custom number to first scene of an episode and you will have forthcoming scenes as required.
Give it a shot and do let me know if this helps.
Thanks,
Ankita-Story Team

What is "Type of Legal Code" in legal regulation setting used for?Thanks

There are several options for "Type of Legal Code" in legal regulation settings.What are they used for? We found that if "others" is selected in this field for certain legal regulation, this legal regulation can't be found in the configuration of "Activate legal regulation " under legal control service or embargo service.Does anyone know what this field used for?thanks

Define the legal regulations is done for all import and export processes you use with SAP Global Trade Services (SAP GTS).
If, for example, you want to use the embargo, sanctioned party list screening, and license determination services in SAP GTS, you must create a legal regulation for each service.
Type of Legal Code : help in indentifing for which purpose its used.
for example:
US Automated Customs Environment (ACE)
Customs Processing - Germany (ATLAS)
German Foreign Trade Regulations
EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) - Restitution
Customs Processing - Austria (eZoll)
Customs Processing - Belgium
Customs Processing - Switzerland
Customs Processing - Denmark
Customs Processing - France
Customs Processing - Great Britain
Customs Processing - Netherlands
Export Administration Regulations
Embargo - United Nations
Numbering System - European Union
Letter of Credit Processing
North American Free Trade Agreement (CA/MX/US)
Pan-European Agreement (EC/EFTA
PAN-EURO-MED
Vinmar Sanctioned Party List Screening
Sanctioned Party List Screening
(NCTS) Transit Procedure Austria - eZoll Transit
(NTCS) Transit Procedure Belgium
(NCTS) Transit Procedure Switzerland - Transit
(NCTS) Transit Procedure Germany - ATLAS Transit
(NCTS) Transit Procedure France - Transit
(NCTS) Transit Procedure The Netherlands
(NCTS) Transit Procedure Slovenia
Others doesn't have relavance. so only i doesn't need activation.

Unable to find any active legal regulations for determination proc. "TEST1"

Hi Guys
This is in regards to a Customs document for a Payment doc
We have just finished the configuration of the Finance integration which will stop blocked partners during the Payment run
Now when we create a Proposal in the Payment run in ECC, the same document gets transferred to GTS, now even though the SPL is active when we check the Log there is a message Unable to find any active legal regulations for determination proc
Upon further investigation of the customs document i found 2 things
1) In the Geography section Country of Departure is populated with US, but the Country of destination is blank, this might be a reason as the Legal regulation checks both the countries and then activate, any idea how i can get the same to populate?
2) If the above population does happen, from which partner type should it come from, as in my customs document only Vendor and Bank is there, in the PO customs document this is being populated properly
Any idea what is wrong here?
Thanks
Carl

Hi Dave
Thanks for answering again.
I have tried activating it at country level, country/country, country/group, Same result in case of all
As i know now since the Country of Destination is missing, it cannot activate the last two, but the same is also not working at country level.
So is there anyway to maybe have some partner function which can populate the Destination country.
Any other advice will be really helpful..
Thanks
Carl

Separate legal regulation for customers and vendors / sanctioned party list

Hi,
since we want to separate responsibilities and mails for checking sanctioned party lists concerning customers (sales department) and vendors (purchasing department) we would like to split business partners using different legal regulations within the GTS system.
But customers as well as vendors are connected to both regulations after uploading, since there is only the country to separate them.
All checks concerning sanctioned party list screening should be separated according to the responsibilities as well.
Is there a way in customizing to solve this? If not: how best could this be done using programming?
Thanks for your help!

Hi Pici,
Take a look at the BAdI Method ACTIVE_LEGAL_REGULATIONS_GET. There you should be able to use the Partner attributes to influence which Legal Regulation is used for the checks.
Regards,
Dave

"No active legal regulations found for country US " while trying to create the Customs Import Declaration

Dear Experts,
As part of creating Customs Import Declaration manually, when I selected the FTO and try to use create button I am getting error message .
Can you please help me in this regard .
No active legal regulations found for country US
Ram

Hi Ram,
As the error message straight away tells , you need to activate Legal Regulation for Customs Management ( in standard case, it will be ACE) for US country through the below path:
SPRO-->SAP Global Trade Services-->Customs Management-->Activate Leagl Regulation for Customs Management at Country/Country Group level
In case of any further queries, please let me know it.
Regards,
Aman

Customs Declaration - Legal Regulation incorrect

I believe there is an issue with how the legal regulation determined during creation of an export customs declaration. My first thought, and from what I have read, the customs declaration legal regulation is determined based of the country where the goods are physically shipped. However, in our situation it appears the determination happens based on the country of the foreign trade organization. Can anyone else confirm this is the case? I have been searching the OSS site for some documentation but apparently have been unable to find the right combination of search keys.
Our situation is this, we have a drop ship sales order where:
Sales Org in ECC: Netherlands
Supplying Plant: United States
Receiving Customer: Serbia
We expected that the customs declaration would have determined an US legal regulation (thus determining US HTS numbers) however, instead, the document determined an EU legal regulation and therefore EU HTS codes. The Geography tab clearly shows the country of departure as US. Does this seem wrong to anyone else? Am I just not understanding the proper determination method for customs declarations?
I did debug and trace to ensure we are not overwriting this information anywhere during the transfer from ECC --> GTS, so I have ruled out code customization as an issue. Any thoughts, comments would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Rachael

Hi Rachael,
For the Export Declaration, GTS determines the Legal Regulation from the country of the Company Code of the Billing Document.
If that does not suit your purpose, you can over-write the data in the ERP BAdI /SAPSLL/IFEX_SD0C_R3.
Regards,
Dave

Numbering Schemes

Hi,
In my scenarios for EAR regulation for license determination, I have same ECCN for Both imports/exports
Is it ok if I define one Numbering scheme on the exports and assign the same for the export as well as import license determination.
Does it impact anything?
Can I have same scenario for even HTS numbering scheme?
Thanks,

Hi Friends,
My question was simple.
for example let us take US right?
I have maintained Numbering scheme (NS) "ScheduleB" for exports side and maintained numbering scheme "ECCNUS" for imports sides then for EAR regulation
Then I need to assign as follows
Regulation                            Import NS                             Export NS
EAR                                     USECCN                             ScheduleB
Now my question is without defining scheduleB and I will define only USECCN then assign as follows
Regulation                            Import NS                             Export NS
EAR                                     USECCN                              USECCN
As per my knowledge It desn't matter which ever naem you use for NS. NS is just structure for assigning value right?
My question, does it have impact from compliance point of view for option 2
Thanks,

Unable to update numbering schemes in define purchasing options

Hi,
We are unable to update the numbering scheme from manual to automatic in define purchasing options (Numbering Tab). Documentation says that you can update it, but it does not give any reason under what circumstances we would not be allowed to update the numbering schemes.
Thanks,
Ketul.

Hi Sandeep,
I am doing multi organisation implementation and only one ledger they do not require Inventory and Purchasing modules. Because of that i will not create any inventory organisation for that selected ledger.
This ledger will have seperate responsibility for AP.
Howver, my problem is when i am trying to complete the financial options, inventory organisation is mandatory for that responsability. Without inventory organisation i am unable to save the financial options.
Please assist me how to overcome this issue.
Thanks,

How do I set numbered lists for headings in Pages 5.2, and keep that system of numbered lists saved?

I have tried to set numbered lists for headings in Pages 5.2 but have not succeeded. I have read similar questions concerning this but this has not helped me...
When I say numbered lists I mean something extremely important and simple, for instance:
1. Introduction
1.1. Background
1.2. Purpose and Questions
2. The Legality of Clause X
2.1. Legality under Article 101.1
2.2. Legality under Article 101.3
And so on...
Heading 1. is selected as "Heading", 1.1 is selected as "Heading 2", and if I had 1.1.1 it would be selected as "Heading 3" and so on...
I have navigated my way to the Format window, and under the tab "Style" and down to "Bullets & Lists". I have here selected the following: Numbered, Numbers, 1. 2. 3. 4., Tiered Numbers, Continue from previous.
There are several problems with this currently.
First, based on the example it becomes "2. Background" when it should be "1.1 Background" instead.
Second, after writing some body text between the headings and then select a new heading, all the previously selected settings I mentioned above in "Bullets & Lists" have to be reselected.
So, how do I set numbered lists for headings, or so called sub-headings, in Pages 5.2? And how do I keep that selected system of numbered lists saved so I don't have to retype it for every new heading I type? (e.g. so that Pages knows that every time I choose Heading 2, I want it to number the heading in the way selected)
Obviously, manually writing the numbers for every heading is not a viable option, as it makes table of contents problematic and is simply tedious. You need an automatic way of doing it, especially if you write long documents where keeping headings in order is absolutely essential.
Also, reverting back to previous Pages versions (like v. 9 I think?) is not an option as that does not exist on my recently purchased Macbook Pro.
I need to be able to do this on Pages 5.2 and do it automatically.
I appreciate any help with this.

iWork '09 is not "outdated" it still works and works extremely well and whilst not perfect with MsWord it is far far better than Pages 5.2 which has a stream of major issues with exporting. It is also way better and faster to use than Microsoft Office.
So what is your time and work actually worth? If it is less than $19.99 for 6 months, you may as well just chuck it in and take that job on minimum wages.
You are assuming things for Office 2014 with absolutely no inside knowledge. Much as we assumed Pages 5 was going to be the long awaited improvement, but ended up being a downgrade to match the iOS version, Microsoft is headed the same way with their mobile versions.
This is not like getting the "latest" pair of pants where you go with the crowd and throw out your cigarette legs which replaced the flares, which replaced your low cuts which replaced your cigarette legs, which replaced…
This is work.
If it does the job and does it well, use it. There is nothing out there to really match what Pages '09 does. Yet.
LibreOffice can do most but not all, but has a UI that only a mother could love. It's great redemption is that it uses both open formats and the standard Microsoft formats and is under active development. It also opens and saves to just about everything. When they finally work out the Pages formats, I'm sure they will open those as well.
I use a lot of professional software. Just because the publisher's marketing department says change the product so we can sell more, doesn't mean you have to pay any attention whatsoever. Adobe being a classical example. Most designers are just ignoring their latest subscription based bloatware and getting on with their work.
Peter

Foreign trade! Legal regulation control

Hello Guys,
If someone has worked on FT-Legal Regulation,kindly tell me whether it is possible to control regulations on the basis of Sales Organisation rather than Country of origin(which is derived from plant).
The requirement is in Intercompany Business <b>wherein the delivering plant is the same</b> and the regulation needs to be picked on the basis of sales organisation.
Ex :
Sales Org 1000 only blocks for Z2 and does not block for Z3
Sales Org 2000 only blocks for Z3 and does not block for Z2
Sales Org 5300 does not block for Z2 or Z3 Legal Regs

Jean,
I have done a Foreign trade implementation.
The core team of the client are FT experts and they would tell you about the legal requirements. Your job is to map them in SAP FT.
In this process you would gain Knowledge about Foreign trade regulations of that country. Remember its country specific.
The ECCN's are provided by the client. Info abt the same is extensivley available on the NET.
You have to get the list of all the mtrls which fall under the controlled cantegory of the respective commerce ministry and then start the config setting these mtrls as relevant for FT checks.
Thanks
Vishal

RELAX NG or Schematron schemas for Pages XML file format?

Hey, I have been following with interest for over a year - more like two years - the whole "where are the XML schemas" for Keynote 1, and then Pages and Keynote 2.
Apparently there is some difficulty obtaining them and I would guess that means defining them. Because if Apple had their hands on them, they would be out - and up to date - by now.
XML Schema (.xsd) files are pretty painful to generate. There is a much simpler and and yet even more powerful schema format called "Relax NG". Assuming someone knows what the grammar is that Pages will willingly/successfully slurp up - they could probably create a .rnc file from scratch pretty quickly. The learning curve is pretty short for basic stuff and the amount of typing required is at least 40% less than when you create a .xsd file.
Some things do not lend themselves to grammar based schemas like XSD, RNG, or RNC.
Instead, a rule based schema language works better. Schematron is very good for this. The suffix for this file type is ".sch". The web site is easy to get to - just type schematron in your web browser's address field and press enter. Specs are all there.
There is a program called Examplotron that creates a Schematron schema for you, given an XML file that is a sample. Of course, making rules from one example is not the same as knowing all the rules. The more different kinds of stuff you have in the file though, the better your chances are of getting a decent start going. Examplotron lives on the web at examplotron.org in case you are curious.
OxygenXML is a very, very good XML editor and schema development environment. I have used it and a bunch of others. It is my favorite, by far.
Someone at Apple should get on this. If it is too hard to create an XML Schema file - then please, please - try to create an RNG, RNC, or SCH file.
If Apple cannot do it, then perhaps the user community could take a crack at it. However, it is a little bit like trying to document the laws of a country by watching what the government people do, what people do who do not get arrested, and what people do who do get arrested.
You are not certain to see an example of every law being broken - for starters, so you will miss some. (One hopes you will not see every law that exists broken!)
You are also not going to be able to tell what laws have influenced behavior that is lawful.
So, for both reasons, you might unwittingly "break the laws" of this hypothetical land. In that case, you might be executed, fined, imprisoned, or as is the case still in some countries - have your hand chopped off!
In the case of feeding a file based on mistaken assuptions to Pages, it certainly will not do what you want it do do. In theory, it might even crash, lose some data, pop up an error - or worse maybe not pop up an error, or corrupt its internal structures and become unstable. Or seem to work but fail to write the whole file out again. Or write out something that it cannot read in again - or does not reconstitute into the document that you used to have.
Granted, there is a brute force technique that can be employed. You can write an AppleScript that gets pages to create a document that exercises every possible style and feature and logical ordering and nesting of things.
Then you can study the XML that generates, or even feed to to Examplotron or a DTD generator.
Doing so would probably be a way to get a good start going.
Without any schema, there is no way to know if a complex program-generated Pages document will work right with pages.
Granted, such program-generated documents can be generated with Applescripts. But if one already has some XML that one wants to blend in, for example - then it would be better to do it with XSLT. Or Java. Or whatever.
Unfortunately, you really have to know what XML is legal in pages - and you have to know the grammar or rules for what Pages expects.
So, any XSD coming from Apple in the near future - or any interest at Apple in completing a .rnc or .rng schema if it gets mostly done by customer(s) and then handed off to Apple to finish?

XML converter (an add on to Inbound Refinery) could be used to display the contents with your XSLT choices but analyzing the file to prevent checkin would take data validation that would be custom. The CS does not care the file format or file type for checkin. Others have looked for analysis of file extension to stop checkin of certain extensions. This has been custom. I think there may be enhancement requests from customers for this kind of validation for the CS but it does not exist in the core yet.

Numbering Scheme for Legal Regulations

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for