NVdia GTX 285, Radeon 4870, GT120

Hi, I plan on only using one monitor so if I want the GTX 285 I should buy the Mac Pro with the GT 120 (and think of it as a throwaway GPU) since I'll have to buy the GTX 285 on my own, correct?
Or should I buy the Radeon 4870, see how it goes and if I need to get the GTX 285, I could get it later. The thing is if I upgrade does the other GPU have any use to me. I mean, I can't somehow link and make the 2 GPU work together can I?

I don't mean to rock the boat even more, but the 4870 on built to order is a fairly good deal (on apple standards) at $200. The upgrade kit if bought after is $350.
It's a tough decision no doubt, but if I were you I'd wait; in fact if you can, wait on buying the mac pro all together. A lot of things are happening this month: WWDC for one on June 8th, plus the release of the 285.
http://developer.apple.com/WWDC/
Even though there probably won't be anything announced for the mac pro (aside from snow leopard), it will be good to see all your options. See some benchmarks when the 285 is released. Make a decision after that. Patience, (if you can) is a virtue

Similar Messages

Possible to Use Radeon 4870 AND EVGA NVIDIA GTX 285 at the Same Time?

Hello,
I just tried to connect a second 30 inch Cinema display to my early 2009 8-core MacPro with a Radeon 4870 card.
The second display maxes out at 1280 x 800 resolution.
I think that is a function of the second port on the 4870, rather than a limitation of the card itself.
To get around this, I ordered the EVGA NVIDIA GTX 285. At $499, that's a big yikes.
Here is my question: Will I get better performance running one 30 inch from the Radeon, and the second from the Nvidia? Can I even install both at the same time? Or should I remove the Radeon and use just the Nvidia?
FWIW, I use this Mac for Photoshop and other image software, and for some stats work. No games. I am using CS4, which would never recognize my 4870. Maybe I will do better with the EVGA NVIDIA GTX 285?
I would appreciate any and all help on this!
Thanks!
Charles

I just tried to connect a second 30 inch Cinema display to my early 2009 8-core MacPro with a Radeon 4870 card.
Are you using the Mini DisplayPort to Dual-Link DVI Adapter?
<http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB571Z/A?fnode=MTY1NDA5OQ&mco=MjkyNjI0Mg>
The second display maxes out at 1280 x 800 resolution.
That's the resolution the 30" will run at with a single-link DVI connection.
I think that is a function of the second port on the 4870, rather than a limitation of the card itself.
It depends on the adapter you use.
To get around this, I ordered the EVGA NVIDIA GTX 285. At $499, that's a big yikes.
It has twice the graphics memory, so may be better if you are processing lots of large images at once.
Here is my question: Will I get better performance running one 30 inch from the Radeon, and the second from the NVIDIA?
No. For only two displays, one card is better because it can handle moving windows between displays, or windows spanning both displays. With the displays on different cards, the main computer has to do more work. Even if the windows are never going to cross display boundaries, there is no way for the applications to know that, so they won't let the graphics cards do as much as they could.
Can I even install both at the same time?
No. There are only two auxiliary power connectors, and one card will use both.
Or should I remove the Radeon and use just the NVIDIA?
Try each card and see which gives the best results with your applications.
FWIW, I use this Mac for Photoshop and other image software, and for some stats work. No games. I am using CS4, which would never recognize my 4870. Maybe I will do better with the EVGA NVIDIA GTX 285?
The extra video RAM may give better performance with lors of large images.

Radeon 2600 vs GTX 285

I have an early 2008 Mac Pro with the ATI Radeon 2600. I recently installed Windows 7 and was looking to upgrade my graphics card to whatever is currently the best available now that I have access to Windows games. Scanning the forum I see the NVIDIA GTX 285 and the ATI Radeon 4870 seem to be the most popular cards. Other than price, is there any reason to choose one over the other?
Thanks.
Message was edited by: bankergrahams

GTX 285 better gaming in windows.

How Do I use an Ati Radeon 4870 HD for 3 Monitors

I am new to the Apple world and community. I recently got a new job that requires me to use a Mac Pro. OS X version 10.6.8. 2.66 ghz dual xeon and 32 GB of ram. It has a ATI Radeon 4870 HD. I can run 2 monitors fine using the DVI and Mini DV port ( Using a convertor from apple. ). When I try to use the 2 other HDMI ports for my third monitor, Mac OS wont detect it. The wierd thing is some of the images from certain apps show on the 3rd Monitor.
Under graphics information it shows the Radeon 4870. Under PCIe information it shows the same card. On the back of my machine I have 2 HDMI slots and another lower down with Mini DV and DVI.
The Displays I am running are 3 HP LP2475w Monitors. Running in DVI mode with one converted to Mini DV. The 3rd non working is running in DVI to HDMI but it can be run Straight HDMI if need. Ive tried alot of configuration settings and I can't get the HDMI port to be detected by MAC OS. Ive plugged one in at a time and just the HDMI do not detect.
Please let me know what information is needed to help troubleshoot this better.

A 5770 is $249 or slightly less and in the same dept to me as replacing hard drives, adding some RAM in order to work and because my understanding is it was the first card to support 3 monitors.
The 5770 only requires 10.6.5+ - and the 4,1 had way too many issues with 10.5.7/10.5.8
The 4870 may or may not provide what you need for the software you run, even though 3 yr old machine but 4 yr old plus video card.
flashing:
http://boeglin.org/blog/index.php?entry=entry090918-031702
4870 vs GTX 285 that came out at that time also
http://www.geek.com/articles/games/macpro-whats-better-ati-radeon-4870-or-nvidia -gtx-285-20090720/
The default card was Nvidia GT120 and req'd no power cables and popular way to support more displays.
People were running DUAL 4870s to support 3rd monitor though back then:
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=665034&page=10

Just a feedback re Ati Radeon 4870 HD 512mb (from Apple UK Website)

I know lots of people have been asking if this card works on 2006 Mac Pros V.1.1.
Well I took the plunge and purchased one fitted it into my MP with leopard O/S
and away it went no problemo as they say Sinc doing this I have updated my
O/S to Snow Leopard and the card run brilliantly with it. I hope this helps
clarify that this card will work with V1.1 despite what Apple state in their
website advertisement.
Happy computing Denis

A 5770 is $249 or slightly less and in the same dept to me as replacing hard drives, adding some RAM in order to work and because my understanding is it was the first card to support 3 monitors.
The 5770 only requires 10.6.5+ - and the 4,1 had way too many issues with 10.5.7/10.5.8
The 4870 may or may not provide what you need for the software you run, even though 3 yr old machine but 4 yr old plus video card.
flashing:
http://boeglin.org/blog/index.php?entry=entry090918-031702
4870 vs GTX 285 that came out at that time also
http://www.geek.com/articles/games/macpro-whats-better-ati-radeon-4870-or-nvidia -gtx-285-20090720/
The default card was Nvidia GT120 and req'd no power cables and popular way to support more displays.
People were running DUAL 4870s to support 3rd monitor though back then:
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=665034&page=10

Early 2009 MacPro with GTX 285 (Mac Edition) - Dual Monitor Setup

Hey Guys - I tried going through the forum to find this, and I think I see some common responses, but wanted to detail my question and make sure I have it right.
I have a MacPro (early 2009) with the EVGA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition GPU. I replaced the GT120 that came with the MacPro. I was initially planning on attaching two monitors to the GTX 285, but I have heard rumors that for smoother performance, I should hook up the GT120 as well and hook up one monitor to that one.
However, I am reading posts regarding other configurations (4870 and GT120, etc), and it seems like there are different responses. Basically, I am looking for better performance for graphics demanding application (gaming, photo-edit, movie, etc).
Thanks for your time and responses ahead of time.

I'm so happy that you're soooo happy. If you were so so happy, I would be disappointed. Blessed? You honor me Japamac-san. I have not bestowed blessings in years, it must have been accidental. Well, I am getting old, there's a reason people move away from me on the subway. I'm glad you interpreted it that way.
Well, ok, the cats out of the bag. I do expect 10.6.2 to do something significant for this card. For gosh sake something has to one day justify this investment...
Both EVGA and Nvidia say it's all up to Apple.
Apple says,... well Apple never says anything,.. but since they sell it on their website one would think it was in their interest to do their best. It's really not nice to sell one card as a 200 dollar option, granted 350 by itself, and another for well over 400 that is only marginally better. It's like looking for a Ford, changing your mind for the Porsche, and ending up getting a Ford with a Porsche sticker on it. This card wails in Windows, how can Apple deny that performance to it's own OS?
While OS changes are incremental one doesn't necessarily expect that all things related to the industry will be. CUDA and Open CL are emerging technologies, but the 285 is real and out there. And it has been for quite some time now. Perhaps more honest marketing campaigns are needed, something like, "Here's the best video card for the Mac out there in existence, you'll just have to wait a few years to see that for yourself, maybe".
Nah, it's not right, you buy a product for what it is, not for what it could be. If it gets better over time that's great, but right from the start it should be worth the price. The 285 hasn't been that yet.
And we 285 owners waited for Snow, with all the talk of Apple's unleashing the power of the GPU. It came and the card ran slower. 10.6.1,... well at least the OS ran better. 10.6.2, well I can't say much about it, but if one can believe what they read, it looks like Apple is at least aware of certain things to be especially worked on. The question for me is to what degree they fine tune things. Can it really be as difficult to create a driver for Nvidia cards, unlike the drivers for ATIs which seem to work with such ease? It's almost like Apple and ATI are intrinsically bound somehow. For instance, with the 285 a new game like COD4 runs just perfectly for me with a 30" monitor, but another game under Rosetta runs not too well at all. Put the 4870 in and COD4 runs very well but not as good as the 285. The Rosetta game however runs great with the ATI. It's things like that I find to be very weird.
If the history of OS X has shown us anything
The history of anything only shows me we learn nothing from it. That's my biggest fear in this case, but I'm encouraged by what I hear.
Expecting 10.6.1 or even 10.6.2, .3, or even .4 to be perfect
That's an odd thing isn't it? How long would car companies last if they fine tuned their cars by analyzing how they failed and crashed for their customers on the road? "Yo, Edsel, I think we need a way to stop them once they're going".
Yet as much as we pay for our computers and equipment we realize that the companies are using us as their R&D Depts. It's an interesting cycle, we're sold things that don't work well, give feedback to make them work well, and next time we buy the better product and it starts all over again.
Well, it's been an interesting chat, full of sound and fury, signifying... well, probably something.

GeForce GTX 285

Any scoop on what the new GeForce GTX 285 card will cost in the UK? Will it cost more that the ATI Radeon HD 4870?
What's the advise for gamers using windows in boot camp. Should we patiently wait for the GeForce GTX 285 if the price is right? From the reports and articles it out performs the ATI HD 4870.
Its a shame apple holds it customers to ransom. I use to be a PC user, I miss the easy of upgrading and changing.

I'm afraid not but, it is available in a week or two on the USA website. I think I'll keep an eye on the Barefeats.com site because they usually get onto these things before anybody else. I think the main problem will be - how good are the drivers, especially with the Pro Apps. One has to assume that they have got their act together with this one and that they have also tested it with Snow Leopard(which I shall be testing this weekend!. So here's hopeing :-))
http://store.apple.com/us/product/TW387ZM/A

Any GTX 285 owners?

I've been holding out for a mac edition radeon 5870... but I'm starting to think I can't wait anymore.
I'm curious if any GTX 285 owners have any feedback regarding performance of this card in snow leopard with aperture 3 compared to a previous card. (I guess this would apply to aperture 2 as well...)
I've read all the speed tests and issues with the drivers of the card and power management... but I'm particularly interested in comparing this with an Nvidia 8800GT.
This is almost impossible to benchmark, because at this point it seems the card will only affect image adjustment operations, I believe RAW decoding and background processing/exporting are CPU bound. If anyone has any before/after feedback of "perceived improvement" while adjusting images I'd like to hear it.
Thanks!

Received the card and installed in my computer today... all I can say is WOW! This is how Aperture should run! Now, let me remind you, I'm coming from a GT 120, so this is probably to be expected. While I don't have technical data to support my claim, I can say that editing a wedding from this weekend was quick, painless and fun!
Let me just say that the GTX 285 is a huge video card. It's probably 4x the size of the GT 120. The fan looks like something I could use on a hot summer day to cool off with. Installation was a cinch and I didn't have to install any software before installing the card (must be due to Snow Leopard having the necessary drivers already).
Ok, now on to Aperture performance. My setup is an 8-Core 2.26 GHz, 6 GB memory Mac Pro with the GTX 285 running two 30" cinema displays. Upon uploading just under 1000 photos, I began editing right away. The photos loaded on my full-screen 30" display quicker than the GT 120, but not as quick as I expected. That is until I realized that Aperture was still processing all of the photos I had just uploaded. While it wasn't unbearably slow by any means, it was MUCH quicker once Aperture could give 100% of it's resources to the task at hand. Once all of the photos were processed, I could flip from photo-to-photo with the full resolution photo being displayed in under 2 seconds. On the GT 120, it sometimes took up to 5 seconds for the photo to 'Load'.
Editing the photos is such a joy now that I have a video card that can keep up. I applied a plethora of heavy edits on a single photo and didn't notice any slowdown in processing or performance. The only time Aperture gives me grief is when I'm applying the 'retouch' edit after doing several other edits. From what I've read, I believe the retouch is supposed to be down first before other adjustments are applied. No biggie, just something I noticed. All of the brushes painted the adjustments on smoothly and when I switched to the 'color overlay' there was no pause or load-time. It instantly showed the areas where the edits were applied! On the GT120, I would be waiting for 10-15 seconds for the color overlay to show on the screen.
Flipping through the browser is a breeze as well! All of the photos, no matter which size thumbnail they are, are loaded instantly. I literally can't scroll the page fast enough for the photos to not be loaded on the screen. The GT120 would leave several photos with a dashed, empty box when scrolling through the photos.
These are just some of the improvements I've noticed. Like I said before, I'm not a tech guru, but I love how Aperture is performing on my Mac Pro. It couldn't be any better and I believe the biggest reason for my performance increase was the GTX 285. Aperture 2 never ran this smooth.

EVGA GTX 285 Mac Edition - No OpenGL in Photoshop

Has anyone else had experiences running the new GTX 285 and Photoshop CS4?
I have a 2008 Mac Pro here, RAID 0 1TB, 32GB RAM, Three Displays (ATI Radeon HD 2600 driving one, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 driving two).
OpenGL used to work fine with my previous card, the ATI Radeon HD 3870 - however after upgrading to the GTX, Photoshop cannot detect and use OpenGL with it.
AfterEffects CS4 picks up the card fine (and by that I mean in the preferences, it's listed along with everything 'Supported').
Any thoughts?
Regards,
Robert Tolton

Ah ha, that might explain why it worked with my all ATI setup.
And now that you've mentioned it, I don't think I ever had OpenGL support when I had the nVidia 7300GT and the ATI HD 3870 in my 2007 Mac Pro - again, a mixture of graphics cards.
I do still have that old nVidia card in the 2007 Mac Pro - might do a swap. If it works, then I'll plant down more cash for the nVidia GT 120 from the Apple Store. Which says it's not compatible with 2008 Mac Pros, but tests have proven that it works fine.

Help using GTX 285

Okay, here's the deal. I need CUDA support on my Mac Pro so that I can run Octane renderer, but I'd rather not drop $800 just for that. So, I found a used GTX 285 (normal one, not Mac edition) and have it ready to install.
I did a search on the Macrumors forums and found Netkas, but I didn't see any clear instructions on how to get the card working. I currently have an ATI Radeon 5770 HD, which I can use as a helper card.
Can anyone direct me to a tutorial on what to do, exactly? Thanks in advance!

All I can give you is some links related to this subject:
The Golden Guide to Flashing Graphic Cards
GTX 285 installation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 and 10.6.4

Hello, so I have a Mac Pro 3.2GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon and installed the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285. when I updated to 10.6.4 last night I started getting a lot of flickers and really weird graphical things on the screen and the computer would freeze. In my CUDA pane under system preferences it says that the update server is unavailable and that an update is required...
CUDA Driver Version: 3.0.14
GPU Driver Version: 1.6.16.11 (19.5.8f01)
I thought these were the latest and greatest... no? What should I do?
Message was edited by: jamesglader

I assume you know what Nvidia's GPGPU and CUDA (as well as PhysX) are and about, and how Adobe and Nvidia have shown what can be done off-loading some of the work the processor use to have to do.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CUDA - has been updated recently too. It is NOT just aimed at OpenCL.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenCL
http://developer.nvidia.com/object/cuda3_0downloads.html
Maybe there is some porting of CUDA to OpenCL going on though, depending how you read it. From Nvidia:
OpenCL (Open Computing Language) is a new cross-vendor standard for heterogeneous computing that runs on the CUDA architecture. Using OpenCL, developers will be able to harness the massive parallel computing power of NVIDIA GPU’s to create compelling computing applications.
As the OpenCL standard matures and is supported on processors from other vendors, NVIDIA will continue to provide the drivers, tools and training resources developers need to create GPU accelerated applications.
http://www.nvidia.com/object/cudaopenclnew.html
10.6.3 brought new APIs. OpenCL 1.1 was just now finalized.
And of course, a lot of people are able to turn to Flash 10.1 and use GPU if they GPU is from Nvidia.
One Mac Pro owner has both ATI 4870 for display purposes, the GTX 285, getting power from 450W PSU placed in lower optical drive bay, for handling rendering and GPGPU tasks.

Mercury CUDA not enabling when using NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 on Apple Mac Pro after Mavericks install

Been using the same setup since CS5 with the Mercury CUDA running perfectly. After recent upgrade of OS X to 10.9 Mercury CUDA is no longer available and only lets me run with the OpenGL or software options. Im using a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 for apple computers. Here are the results for the GPUSniffer program in the latest Premiere Pro 7.1.0 files. The LAST line make me chucle because it the first on the list of supported card in the "cuda_supported_cards.txt" file. Anybody else seen this?
--- OpenGL Info ---
Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
Renderer: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 OpenGL Engine
OpenGL Version: 2.1 NVIDIA-8.18.27 310.40.05f01
GLSL Version: 1.20
Monitors: 1
Monitor 0 properties -
   Size: (0, 0, 1920, 1080)
   Max texture size: 8192
   Supports non-power of two: 1
   Shaders 444: 1
   Shaders 422: 1
   Shaders 420: 1
--- GPU Computation Info ---
Found 1 devices supporting GPU computation.
OpenCL Device 0 -
   Name: GeForce GTX 285
   Vendor: NVIDIA (Apple platform)
   Capability: 1.2
   Driver: 1
   Total Video Memory: 1024MB
   * Not enabled by default because it did not match the named list of cards.

found a link from a couple of days ago on a creative cow forum post one of the poster saying they are from adobe stating this
Re: Mercury Playback Engine MacPro
by Peter Garaway on Nov 12, 2013 at 9:49:16 am
Hi Wendell,
Sorry for the inconvenience. NVIDIA is currently working on drivers that support CUDA on Mavericks 10.9 with some of the older NVIDIA cards such as the GTX 285 and the Quadro 4800.
For others interested, the Quadro 4000, K5000 and GTX 680 ect... work with CUDA in 10.9.
Best,
Peter Garaway
Adobe
Premiere Pro
I have latest CUDA drivers, so i guess i am just waiting till a proper update that have the fixes to support my card.

Mac Pro 2008 with Radeon 4870 video useable resolution on DVI limited to size of minidisplay port VGA when displays are mirrored. Did not have this problem until I plugged in new monitor (miniDisplayport), but now it affects even going back original mon

Have been using the Mac Pro since 2008. Changed to a Radeon 4870 card early this year. Everything was fine.
Running an old KDS monitor from minidisplay port to VGA and a 1400x1050 projector from DVI out. Have used the
two mirrored the entire time with no trouble.
The old kDS monitor looked like it was starting to go bad so I got another monitor. Don't have much room
so it's a 14inchwith widescreen 1328x768 display. Hooked that to minidisplay port as it only has a VGA input.
Immediately the LCD display took over and restricted the output to the projector.
If I turn off mirroring, I can get projector back to normal. But this makes running programs a lot more difficult.
It worked fine with mirroring on before the monitor change. Except going back to old monitor,
now it is affecting things. I pull up display preferences. If the displays are mirrored, even setting the projector
to 1400x1050, it says "usuable resolution 1280x1024." It didn't use to do this at all.
Tried reseting NVRAM - no result.
Any suggestions would be helpful. Just looking at the image on the projector, I don't see any difference from
before.

UPDATE:
As noted in the first post, both of these newer USB DAC work fine at 24/96 on my wife's iMac, so it's clear that they didn't both become defective when I connected them to the Macbook Pro at the same time.
Resetting the Macbook Pro PRAM didn't help, so I removed the hard shell laptop case to get to the battery and remove it, then reset the SMC. After that I could use the original DAC at 24/96 again, but only IF it was plugged into the rear USB port. If I plugged it into the front USB port then the sound was garbled and filled with noise. This was a vast improvement over no sound at all.
Then I switched to the replacement/updated DAC, but I got no sound at all from either USB port at any bit-rate. And returning to the original DAC again now results in no sound again.
Sigh... I will reset the PRAM and SMC again, and see how far I can get with this. I'd still love some help. Thanks!

ATI Radeon 4870 won't detect second display

ATI Radeon 4870 won't detect second display I have a sony that come up as a sdm-hs95p and a asus that i want to connect they both have vga and both have conveters vga to dvi and on the asus it also has a dvi to mini dp because on the graphics card it has dvi and mini dp

You can't use more than one converter per display.
You need to get single converter that connects directly from the Mac port to the display.

Dual Radeon 4870 in 2009 Mac Pro

Can I install 2 Apple supplied Radeon 4870's in the new 2009 Mac Pro?

Hey just look & found even better this will power both 4870's leave your mac some more power for the other stuff OUTPUT.CONNECTORS: STANDARD PCI-EXPRESS 6.PIN :: 2 OUTPUTS
ADVANCED PCI-EXPRESS 8.PIN :: 2 OUTPUTS Just what you need on the Mac Pro & use the other slots that need power as well
LINK
*http://www.fspgroupusa.com/BOOSTERX.asp*
DEDICATED MULTI.GPU POWER |:
BOOSTERX 5 QUAD PCI.E OUTPUT |:
45O.WATT (500.WATT MAX.) TOTAL OUTPUT ::
MFG PART# PPA4501100 | UPC# 845685004208 ::
SAFETY: UL, CSA, VDE, NEMKO, CNS, CE, CB, FCC ::
FULL RANGE INPUT | OVP | OVP | SCP OUTPUT ::
RoHS | LEAD.FREE | GREEN PRODUCT ::
3-YEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE WARRANTY ::
AVAILABLE IN 300W | e.brochure | reviews | tech.data | tech.diagram
:|: FEATURES : :|: SPECIFICATIONS :
:|: QUAD PCI-EXPRESS 2X(6.PIN)+2X(8.PIN) :|: EFFICIENCY: 85%+
:|: INDEPENDENT POWER.BOOST TO ATX PSU
:|: LOW RIPPLE | LOW OPERATING NOISE
:|: DUAL FRONT IN.TAKE COOLING FANS :|: OPERATING TEMPERATURE: 0 TO +50C
:|: .99 ACTIVE.PFC | ULTRA-HIGH EFFICIENCY :|: STORAGE TEMPERATURE: -20 TO +65C
:|: 5.25" STANDARD DRIVEBAY TYPE ADD.ON :|: HUMIDITY: 10-90% NON.CONDENSING
:|: NVIDIA SLI READY CERTIFIED :|: OVP: OVER VOLTAGE OUTPUT PROTECTION
:|: 7-COLOR SWITCHABLE FRONT PANEL :|: OCP: OVER CURRENT OUTPUT PROTECTION
:|: DUAL FRONT IN.TAKE COOLING FANS :|: SCP: SHORT CIRCUIT OUTPUT PROTECTION
:|: AUTO POWER RECOVERY SYSTEM :|: 100% HI.POT TESTED
:|: COMPLETE INSTALLATION KIT :|: MTBF: 100,000 HOURS @ 25C AMBIENT
OUTPUT.CONNECTORS: STANDARD PCI-EXPRESS 6.PIN :: 2 OUTPUTS
ADVANCED PCI-EXPRESS 8.PIN :: 2 OUTPUTS
INPUT : FULL RANGE INPUT (U.S.) | WORLDWIDE
PATENTED INPUT FUSE PROTECTION BUILTI-IN
UNIT : DIMENSIONS | WEIGHT : 7.5"W X 1.63"H X 5.69"L @ 3LBS
RETAIL BOX : DIMENSIONS | WEIGHT : 13.75"W X 3.5"H X 7.65"L @ 4LBS
SHIPPING BOX : DIMENSIONS | WEIGHT : 29.0"W X 8.0"H X 14.5"L (8 UNITS PER CARTON) @ 40LBS
OUTPUT CHART :

NVdia GTX 285, Radeon 4870, GT120

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for