Nvida Quadro K2000 and Telsa K20

I have a system with a Nvida Quadro K2000 and Tesla K20. After Effects, Premier and Speedgrade do not indicate that this is an acceptable GPU yet the website claims it is? How do I configure the software?

cuda_supported_cards.txt
You will likely have to go into the Nvidia control panel and set the Cuda GPU to the K20. You will want to set it up on global and then under the programs option for Premiere and Adobe Media Encoder. I have seen a bug lately where the Nvidia control panel resorts back to the Primary video card under each program listing even when you set the global option in the Nvidia control panel.
Eric
ADK

Similar Messages

I installed a NVIDIA QUADRO K2000 card and downloaded the most current drivers. AE does not accept

Can anyone offer a solution for this? I installed a NVIDIA QUADRO K2000 graphics card. I downloaded the latest drivers for the card. AE reports that this GPU is incompatible. This is one of recommended listed cards for CS6. Any suggestions?

> This is one of recommended listed cards for CS6.
Where did you get that information? That card is not on this list:
http://www.adobe.com/products/aftereffects/tech-specs.html
What is the exact message that you're referring to when you say that After Effects "reports that this GPU is incompatible"? Is it just saying that it won't use this GPU for the CUDA acceleration of the ray-traced 3D renderer? If so, the only thing that you'd be missing is GPU acceleration of one feature.
See this page for details of how the GPU is used in After Effects:
http://blogs.adobe.com/aftereffects/2012/05/gpu-cuda-opengl-features-in-after-effects-cs6. html

Bought a Quadro K2000 Video Card, After Effects CC Won't detect it?

I recently bought a Quadro K2000 for some simple 1080p video editing and rendering. Now there comes the problem, It seems like After Effects is not detecting the card, CUDA is enabled and the card is supported in the list. I have tried many solutions but unfortunately I still have this problem. Also with rendering a video my CPU still takes all the load instead of the GPU, therefore it goes really slow, 5 minute render takes up to 2+ hours. I bought this video card so my render also got quicker but it seems like After Effects just won't use the GPU for rendering. I have Ray tracing 3D rendering on.
Can someone please explain to me why my Quadro K2000 is not used for rendering the videos but instead it still uses my CPU. I hope the $500 was no waste of money for this card.
Thanks in advance,
Sjoerd

You have given us little information to go by. What exact version of After Effects? What operating system. Show a screenshot of your GPU Information dialog box in After Effects.
The Quadro K2000 was added to the list of cards tested and supported for use by the ray-traced 3D renderer in this version:
http://blogs.adobe.com/aftereffects/2013/09/after-effects-cc-12-1-whats-new-and-changed.ht ml

Quadro K2000 Mercury Hardware Acclerated Encoding

Hello,
I have got a question about hardware acclerated encoding with a Nvidia Quadro K2000.
We have got a video clip that we want to encode in 720p H264. Graphics card was recognized by Premiere, Premiere itself switched to the correct Hardware acclerated encoder.
However, it isn't working, video isn't encoding unless I select Fully Software as the encoder. Driver is brand new downloaded from Nvidia website.
There is no error message, it just goes to the progress bar screen and after that: big nothing, no progress at all, no file gets written to disk.
Any ideas? Are there special drivers neeeded? Is the Card unsupported despite it is listed as a supported one?

Agree with cc_merchant. 16GB RAM is the current minimum for glitch free editing, as the software will normally consume 8-12GB while active. Minimal disk spec should be one system disk, and if possible, a 2-disk raid running on a separate buss for project/video files. If you go the raid route and use a raid card, be sure the card is placed on the PCI slot with the fastest lane, and not to interfere with other cards. Another reason for using a raid card is that it frees up one buss on the mobo so you can add a 3rd hard drive for scratch/media files. Never fill the drives past the 50% mark to avoid issues with performance due to fragmentation, etc. Move completed projects off onto a external drive for storage, and only use that external drive for the transfer, disconnecting when not in use to free up resourced during edits.
The magic bullet or holy grail of a good editing system is the careful memory management and routing of data on the system buss. Avoiding conflict, collisions and latency. I've been doing the above configurations since 1999, owning several systems, all Dell Precisions.

Premiere Pro CS 5.5 does not recognise Nvida Quadro 2000d

I build a system with the following specs:
Intel i7
PNY Nvida Quadro 2000d
Windows 7 professional
8 GB Ram
128 SSD
1 TB x 1 TB Raid
I bought the boxed version of Production Premium CS 5.5. As I see in Premiere Project Setup, I have only MPE software only and the optoin is deactivated. However, as I see OpenGL in After effects is Quadro 2000d and it is working well. Did any one have similar experice? Looking desperately for some help.

In the Premiere program folder on your system drive, run the executable labled:
GPUSniffer.exe
If that doesn't make mecury playback available, install the latest NVidia drivers from their website and try again. If that doesn't work, make sure the name of your Video Card listed in the cuda_supported_cards.txt text file in your Premiere program folder. Quadro 2000D was listed in mine.
Also make sure your card is recognized by your system as a "Quadro 2000D"

Quadro 5000 and Geforce

hi everyone, I'm basicly using maya, nuke and sometimes adobe programs. my pc is 3 years old second gen i7, it's still good but I'm about to get a heavy project and it's time to get a new one for me.
1- I need to learn if I can use geforce and quadro (sli or separate) cards on my desktop pc.
drivers and programs will run okay?
2- I'm about to get 3770k cpu and quadro 5000, but I can't decide what is best motherboard to use on this rig.
regards,

Here's how GPU performance can slow down on an LGA 1155 platform: The CPU itself has only 16 available PCI-e lanes. Normally, all 16 of those lanes are fed to the GPU that's sitting in the primary PCI-e x16 slot. But on most LGA 1155 motherboards, if you add a second GPU, then the bandwidth of the primary PCI-e x16 slot will drop to only x8 bandwidth because the secondary PCI-e x16 slot would then steal eight of those PCI-e lanes from the primary x16 slot. (There are a few LGA 1155 motherboards that maintain x16 bandwidth in the primary x16 slot even with a second GPU installed - but that is because the "secondary" x16-length slot is actually only an x4 slot, run off of the P67/Z68/Z77 PCH in PCI-e 2.0 x4 mode, instead of directly off of the CPU.) (By the way, LGA 1155 CPUs have 20 total PCI-e lanes - but four of those are actually fed to the P67/Z68/Z77 PCH, making only 16 lanes available for GPUs.)
And we've been advising against the Quadro 5000 because it is now two generations old, and as such outdated. In fact, it dates all the way back to 2010 when the first-generation hexacore i7, the i7-980X, was brand new (Sandy Bridge was not yet on the market back then). As a GPU, it is no faster than an old GeForce GTX 465 that it's based on because although both GPUs have 352 CUDA cores, the Quadro 5000's low actual clock speed of 513MHz (compared to the 607 MHz of the GTX 465) completely offsets the Quadro 5000's higher memory bandwidth of 120 GB/s (versus 102.6 GB/s on the GTX 465). Yet it still costs more than $1,500 new, even today. That's extremely severely overpriced for a GPU that's only going to be used in a secondary capacity, with the GPU going almost completely unutilized most of the time.
Finally, there is the issue of driver compatibility: GeForce drivers generally do not work with Quadros, nor do Quadro drivers work with GeForces. And there is a good chance that the two drivers will conflict with one another, seriously affecting stability and performance. That is more likely to occur if the GeForce and Quadro cards are of two completely different GPU generations (for example, that Quadro 5000 that you're considering may clash with the GeForce 600-series GPU that's being used as primary). So, to minimize the risk of such conflicts, only consider a K-series Quadro if you need 10-bit output for a system that normally uses a GeForce GTX 600-series GPU. (This means that as a secondary output GPU for 10-bit monitors, a $400 Quadro K2000 or even a $200 Quadro K600 would suffice as a secondary output card.)
And no, the LGA 2011 platform with its i7-39xx CPU is not a first-generation i7. It is actually considered a second-generation i7 (like the i7-3770K's predecessor, the i7-2600K/2700K).
Message was edited by: RjL190365

AE2014 does not recognize Quadro 4200 with Tesla K20.

Hello.
AE2014 does not recognize Quadro 4200 with Tesla K20. As I can see in this datasheet System requirements | After Effects, theese devices are not listed as capable. Is any chance to get it work? Should I install a special Nvidia driver or do something else?
Thank you in advance.

Yes, but there is very little reason to do that.
The only thing in After Effects that uses CUDA is the GPU acceleration of the ray-traced 3D renderer, and that feature is obsolete and being phased out. There are better ways to do 3D in After Effects, including using Cinema 4D (which is included with After Effects).

Nvidia (Quadro K2000) Driver isn't installed during OSD (Task Sequence succeeded) - HP Z620

Hi everyone,
I have added a driverset (HP Z620) in SCCM for the first time using our internal procedure (Importing Drivers to SCCM, Create Driver package with specific category, apply driver package in TS using WMI to query for the model).
The Task Sequence succeeded, but the NVIDIA K2000 Graphics driver isn't installed (only HD Graphics 4000 driver).
Looking at the drivers in the Driver Package, this should normally apply since the driver is compatible with this specific GPU.
At the forums, I can see that some people have created a seperate package for the GPU driver installation using command line switches.. But looking at the environment at the customer, we have never done this and in the past, we have succesfully installed
the driver for this GPU before.
PS: The driver for the GPU in my new driver package (HP Z620) isn't the same as for previous models (HP Z220, Z230, Z600).
Could you please advise me what to do? Should I have added something in the driver sources before importing the driver to SCCM?
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards

Hi
I m installing Nvidia (Quadro K2000) Driver during OSD (Task Sequence succeeded) - HP Z420
Remove the Graphics driver for NVIDIA from the current driver database
Added below task in the existing task sequence as invidual installation based on the Condition (WMI query)
Command Line
HP_Z420_Graphics_x64\Win64_332_50\setup.exe -s -k -clean -noeula
This will install the desired driver and related configurable components
WMI Query
select * from win32_ComputerSystem where manufacturer like '%hewlett%' and model like '%z420%'
Currently I m looking out for the Errors codes needed to add to this task . Success codes 3010 and 0 already added

Quadro K2000 vs Geforce GTX 680 for AE CS6

Hi,
I want to buy one of these two cards for using with After Effects CS6. The price point of these two are about the same, although the GTX is a bit cheaper. The specs of the GTX 680 on the other hand are much more appealing then the Quadro K2000.
Especially for the Ray-Traced Renderer the 1536 CUDA Cores vs 384 CUDA Cores seems much better.
The only donwside I could find is, that the GTX uses about 4 times the power of the Quadro and is going to be louder. Also the driver for the Quadro is working more stable than the Geforce driver.
Am I missing anything here or would be the GTX be the better choice?
Kind regards
Christian

Christian,
The main performance determining factor for a video card is the memory bandwidth, not the amount of memory. Memory bandwidth is more important than number of cores too.
See a limited performance comparison here: Video Card Performance and scroll down a bit till you see the relevant graph.
Interpolating, one would expect the performance of the K2000 to be between the GTX 550 Ti and the GT 640, possibly with a score around 120-130 seconds, around 4 times slower than a GTX 680.

Premiere won't use my Quadro K2000

why won't premiere use my Quadro K2000?

I just experienced this same issue today after replacing my Quadro 2000 with a Quadro K2000. I found a text file in Program Files/Adobe/Abode Premier Pro CS5.5 called cuda_supported_cards.txt. I bought CS5.5 quite a while ago (before the K cards came out), so they aren't on the list in this file. I added Quadro K2000 to the list, saved the file, restarted PrPro and I now have Mercury Playback GPU Acceleration with the K2000.

Looking for how to run both a Quadro 4000 and a geforce card win7 please

hello,
way back when i built the window 7 editing rig i tried to get a quadro 4000 and a geforce 9800 GT (older version) to work together to get 4 displays going
but i had stability issues so i got another quadro and never had a problem
however, reading this recent thread
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1258243?tstart=0
it sounds like users are able to mix quadro 4000 with geforce cards
using the geforce for the cuda processing and the quadro for the output
i still want to run 4 monitors (2 from the quadro 4000 and then 2 from the geforce card (open to suggestions here)
if i can mix cards now i'd like to get a geforce gpu to help out with 4k editing of a feature (probably red scarlet)
and use the quadro for 10bit output
as always positive feedback is appreciated, cheers, j

hello,
no i am still sticking with cs6 for now
and i found where i had read the instructions before
(an answer to one of my own previously asked questions):
Install Quadro Driver full installation via Wizard.
Decompress Geforce Driver latest version but do not run Wizard install.
Manually update Geforce Card driver via Device manager by pointing to Nvidia/Geforce folder
Launch Nvidia Control Panel and set the GPU Acceleration to Geforce card only.
Eric
ADK
i guess this wraps this one up
thanks for taking the time to read
sorry for wasting your time
cheers, j

Bad performance quadro 4800 and premiere pro

Could someone please help me understand if somethings wrong with my settings or if my 4800 is defected?
I run OSX Lion 10.7.2 and have the quadro fx 4800 installed in a:
Mac Pro 4,1
2 x 2.93Ghz Quad-core Intel Xeon
12GB of Ram
with two additional Geforce GT 120 installed too.
the latest drivers for the 4800
GPU driver version: 7.12.9 270.05.10f03
CUDA driver version: 4.0.50
I run Premiere 5.5.2 and have tested the performance with the two different settings:
Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration
Mercury Playback Engine Software Only
I did this test because I didn’t feel my 4800 did the work I’ve read everywhere it should. Adding simple text titles to AVCHD footage made my playback drop frames.
Anyhow, I tested my machine with 1920x1080 AVCHD and added video layers until I started to see stutter during playback. First with “Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration”. With 14 video layers sized down so you could see them all beside one another playback started to drop frames. The yellow line was still yellow in the top of the timeline. Shouldn’t it turn red if the footage needs rendering?
I then switched to “Mercury Playback Engine Software Only” and the yellow line turned red. The strange thing is that when I played back the same 14 layers of video the dropped frames where gone!! Isn’t this beyond strange??? Shouldn’t everything run more smooth with the “Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration”?
Has it got anything to do with my Geforce GT 120 installed? Should I get rid of those? My two 24 inch apple displays are both connected to the 4800.
PLEASE help me or redirect me to some good forums!

After testing final cut (which I love) and Premiere back and forth with the exact same media I notice that editing prores in Final cut is the best when it comes to just edit the film. Sure Premiere does take native MTS files but what good is this when it doesn't run fluidly? Comparing playback and editing with prores in Final Cut and Premiere makes me realize that on my computer, don't ask me why, a rendered sequence with prores material in Premiere is far more jerky than a sequence with prores that "do not need render" in Final cut. Shouldn't they be the same?? Movements like camera pans that originally were shot really smoothly isn't as smooth as they should be playing back in premiere (and yes I know I got the right sequence settings and all). Final cut however gives me what I want.
To me it all comes down to how good the editing App presents what you currently are editing. Adobe has many advantages with the dynamic link and so on but playback is a such an important part of editing!! Has anyone got the same problem with "not as smooth playback as you would really want" even though the sequence is rendered displaying a green line??
Thanks for the links lasvideo but I practically read every article there is about CUDA, premiere and mercury playback engine already.
Anyone knows anything about Adobe CS 6 release dates?
12 dec 2011 kl. 22:03 skrev lasvideo:
Re: bad performance quadro 4800 and premiere pro
created by lasvideo in Premiere Pro CS5 & CS5.5 - View the full discussion
Some answers for you right from the horses mouth
http://blogs.adobe.com/premiereprotraining/2011/02/cuda-mercury-playba ck-engine-and-adobe-premiere-pro.html
http://forums.adobe.com/message/3804386#3804386
http://forums.adobe.com/community/premiere/faq_list
Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4079978#4079978
To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/4079978#4079978. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
Start a new discussion in Premiere Pro CS5 & CS5.5 by email or at Adobe Forums
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

Is it possible to install Snow Leopard on a PC and to run it with two Nvidia Quadro Cards and 8 Screens?

Is it possible to install Snow Leopard on a PC and to run it with two Nvidia Quadro Cards and 8 Screens?

Furthermore, all new Macs since 2006 have been able to have Windows or Linux installed on them natively with virtualization engines*:
http://www.macmaps.com/macosxnative.html#WINTEL
You may even want to consider a used Mac Pro*:
http://www.macmaps.com/usedrefurbished.html

Adobe Maximus with Quadro K5000 and Tesla C2075

Hi there,
i have a Nvidia Quadro K5000 installed in my 3D workstation and wanted to extend the existing configuration with a Tesla Card from Nvidia.
Because i have a Tesla C2075 in my other workstation i was thinking to combine both cards in my 3D workstation as a Maximus setup.
Is it possible to drive the configuration with both cards? Or do i need to have a Tesla K20?
Thanks for your feedback in advance
René

[Moved to Hardware forum.]

Using High-end Windows 8.1 system with Quadro Card and CC2014 fails on many levels. Help!!

I produce TV spots daily and and I can not afford so many failures. CC2014 is the worst experience for us and we have several systems that prove it's not our hardware.
-Crashes repeatedly (and most times can not be replicated)
-Freezes when queuing to media encoder
-Rendered media has variable results and sometimes has no audio (or the audio is partially there). Have to reboot to correct.
-Sporadic timeline behavior with audio playback being intermittent
-Useless clip syncing function using audio tracks
-Clip movement is frozen and cannot be moved until it's de-selected or the system has to be restarted
-Project bin behavior sends clips and text to the wrong folder.
-All the above happens when Cuda card is turn on or off.
-Some operations can not returned to normal unless we cold boot
-Just found out that the audio filter DeNoiser does not render out entirely, you can hear mid way the clip when it kicks in
I originally paid for my monthly subscription because CC first came out as an improvement to earlier version, and was very stable. Now I'm wonder why I'm wasting my money. Don't get me wrong, I like where adobe is heading but they need to address the problem or offer a discount. I'd rather they fix EVERYTHING!
My system (one of them)
Operating System        Microsoft Windows 8.1 Pro with Media Center
Central Processor        Dual Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz (16 cores)
Graphics                     Video Adapter        NVIDIA Quadro 6000
                                  Screen Resolution        2560 x 1080
RAM                          63.95 GB
Free Memory              54.68 GB
Total Hard disk           7898.89 GB
Motherboard               Z9PE-D8 WS
Manufacturer              ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
Any ideas? Is there any updates coming?
My work... http://cmediapost.com

Hi,
Try to boot from win PE, please verify disk status, make sure partitions, files applied successfully.
Please also check boot files.
In addition, is the machine under UEFI mode?
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Nvida Quadro K2000 and Telsa K20

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for