NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 vs ATI Radeon HD 4870

i finally get to buy my mac pro and replace my aging g5 ... yay me!
anyone care to comment on the two graphics card choices ???

I would like to point out that nVidia does in fact have information on their main page about the GeForce GT 120. And yes... It is essentially a low power 9500GT. It is almost an identical card except that the Memory Clock has been locked at 500mhz and the Core GPU has been down powered to 500mhz vs 550mhz. Which goes in line with the way apple's GPUs are always slightly slower and optimized. So yes... If you want increased performance I would suggest the 4870. And yes I just looked at the site and it is indeed a 4870 listed as the 200 dollar upgrade. the 4870 is one of the better graphics cards on the market right now for the 250-300 dollar price point. As well as ATI cards seem to have a much nicer color range than nVidia cards.
Having had both recently in my PC system (A 4850 and a 9800GTX+) The ATI was certainly a nicer looking card, just not quite as good performing. Except on Crysis which actually did run better due to ATI cards tending to roll better with games that really push the texture palate as well as Filtering.
Only thing that is unfortunate is that I do not see an option for dual 4870's for Crossfire. At 2500 dollars you would think that would be a nice feature to include!!

Similar Messages

  • Nvidia GeForce 7300 GT and ATI Radeon X1900 XT

    I have a Mac Pro 2,1 running 10.6.1 and BootCamp.
    I had a Nvidia GeForce 7300 GT video card in it and it ran well under BootCamp.
    I installed a ATI Radeon X1900 XT.
    Under BootCamp the 2 cards seem incompatible, with an error message that the driver on the Nvidia card has been disables due to an incompatibility with the other card.
    Is there a solution for this?
    If I wanted 2 cards inside would they both need to be the ATI's or Nvidia's?
    Thanks

    Hi I would maybe get a Apple Upgrade Kit the GT 120 is 512MB's & dose not use all 16 lanes as it like to make you think & will work on 2006 Mac Pro's at $149.00 I would say if you just want more displays get two & eBay your old cards. Please know if you game you will want more power but if only for more displays this 1 slot card is great.
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Graphics Upgrade Kit for Mac Pro (early 2009)
    View all Questions
    It as well as the much better 4870 both work with the Mac Pro 1,1 & 2,1
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Graphics Upgrade Kit for Mac Pro (early 2009)
    The NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 includes 512MB of GDDR3 memory, uses the PCI Express 2.0 interface, and includes one Mini DisplayPort and one dual-link DVI port.
    Learn more Questions & Answers
    2 Questions + 2 Answers
    Based on 11 reviews
    Write a review
    $149.00
    Ships: Within 24hrs
    Free Shipping
    Overview
    The NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 with 512 MB of GDDR3 memory delivers excellent all-around performance whether your playing games or dealing with creative and scientific applications. With up to four NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 graphics cards installed, a Mac Pro can support up to eight displays simultaneously.
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 includes two video ports: one Mini DisplayPort and one dual-link DVI port. This allows you to connect both the 24-inch Apple LED Cinema Display or another Mini DisplayPort-based display, and a DVI-based display such as the 30-inch Apple Cinema HD Display. Display adapters are available to connect VGA displays.
    Good Luck man
    Thomas

  • NVIDIA GeForce 120 or ATI Radeon X1900... which is better?

    Hi-
    I currently have the ATI Radeon X1900 graphics card installed in my Mac Pro 2.26 Nehalem. I'm not having any issue's with the card except that the fans turn On quite frequently, and they're a little loud.
    I'm not using it for any games, etc... My primary use is with Pro Tools (a music DAW application).
    The ATI Radeon X1900 is running a Apple 30" display and a Sony Bravia 46" LCD.
    If I replaced the ATI Radeon X1900 with a NVIDIA GeForce 120, would I be asking for trouble?
    Thanks in advance.

    If I replaced the ATI Radeon X1900 with a NVIDIA GeForce 120, would I be asking for trouble?
    If your Mac Pro came with ATI Radeon X1900, then it needs a card with EFI-32 firmware. The NVIDIA GeForce 120 has EFI-64 firmware, and won't work in the pre 2008 Mac Pro. The only upgrade for early Mac Pros is the ATI Radeon HD 4870
    <http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB999ZM/A?fnode=MTY1NDA5OQ&mco=MTA4MzU2NTc>
    (Despite what Apple says, it will work in any Mac Pro.)
    You will need a Mini DisplayPort adapter for the second display,

  • ATI Radeon HD 4870 not better than the Nvidea Geforce 120?

    I bought av new ATI Radeon HD 4870 card to my MacPro. But are wery disappointed. My old NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 performes almost better than ATI. I ran Cinebench test and this is the results:
    *NVIDIA GeForce*
    Rendering (Single CPU): 3225 CB-CPU
    Rendering (Multiple CPU): 18880 CB-CPU
    Multiprocessor Speedup: 5.85
    Shading (OpenGL Standard): 6107 CB-GFX
    *ATI Radeon HD 4870*
    Rendering (Single CPU): 3218 CB-CPU
    Rendering (Multiple CPU): 18852 CB-CPU
    Multiprocessor Speedup: 5.86
    Shading (OpenGL Standard): 5846 CB-GFX
    I also ran the Photoshop Actiontest from www.retouchartists.com on a large .tiff file, and my ATI Radeon used 1,10,2 and NVidea used 1,09,4. That is almost 1 second better for the old card.
    Apple says that the ATI 4870 card performs 2x better than the Nvidea 120. That is not my experience!

    Hello,
    I currently have a 2008 3.0Ghz Harpertown mac pro and I am trying to figure out what to do here. I just purchased the 24 inch cinema display, but yet I have a nice 1GB 4870 ati radeon I got off ebay. Its more powerful than the Apple version, but lacks the mini-display port.
    Currently, I have the ATI RADEON 2600 XT connected, though inactive, while my 4870 is active.
    So, should I just get the Nvidia GT 120 and keep my 1GB 4870, or should I get rid of the 4870 I have and just buy Apple's? Either way, the GT 120 works in a 2008 mac pro despite what Apple says on their site that it only works in 2009 mac pros.

  • DVI to video MacPro with a NVIDIA GeForce GT 120

    Hi All
    I am currently trying to connect an external projector to create a second desktop.
    I have tried using the DVI to Video adapter, but this doesn't seem to work. The adapter works fine with macbook pro though.
    Is it something to do with the graphics card being a NVIDIA GeForce GT 120, and not a ATI X1900 XT - which seems to be what is suggested under the product description in the apple store?
    If this is the case, what cable will allow me to create a video (preferably a composite) out from the DVI connector on the back of this MacPro.
    The MacPro has one DVI video out and one MiniDisplay out. The monitor is using the MiniDisplay port out and I would prefer to not convert this i.e. DVI to a mini Display out for the monitor, and then use a MiniDisplay port as the video out for the projector - attaching some kind of MiniDP to video adapter. Although I don't know if that is possible.
    Any suggestions as to the best solutions are much appreciated.
    Neil

    Conversion of the signals provided on a DVD-I connector to Composite Video and/or S-Video requires some circuitry in the adapter. To support that, the DVI port would have to supply power. My suspicion is that only the X1900 does this, but some research may determine whether your GT120 supplies power or not.
    VGA requires no additional circuitry, because the VGA signals are present at the end of the connector, in the bar and four pins directly around it.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DigitalVisualInterface

  • Ere are the specs on the Mac I need more power on.  Mac Tower Processor  2 x 2.26 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon Memory  6 GB 1066 MHz DDR3 ECC Graphics  NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 512 MB Serial Number  H00354XF20G Software  OS X 10.8.5 (12F45)  Harddive 640 GB SATA

    ere are the specs on the Mac I need more power on.
    Mac Tower
    Processor  2 x 2.26 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
    Memory  6 GB 1066 MHz DDR3 ECC
    Graphics  NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 512 MB
    Serial Number  H00354XF20G
    Software  OS X 10.8.5 (12F45)
    Harddive 640 GB
    SATA Disk
    (2) Harddrives 1 TB
    SATA Disk
    RAM 6 slots total  -- 6 are filled with 1GB
    (3) UAD Quad cards installed
    I use this computer stictly for audio recording. 
    Pro Tools 10.3.7
    Interface Apollo 16
    Pro Tools is curretnly not compatible with Maverick.   Also, I believe that Pro Tools 10 only allows 4GB ram to be utilized (not sure ) 
    I know Pro Tools 11 allows more, but not sure how much more.  Also not sure if the upgrade to Pro Tools 11 I will have to purchase all new plug ins or if my existing ones will continue to work in it.
    The platform changes from 32 bit to 64 with the upgrade to 11
    If it is as simple as adding more ram, what mode-part #l would you recomeend.  Can the processor be upgraded also ?
    The new tube like Macs are non compatible with UAD Cards.  Those cards a must my sessions

    You can use Activity Monitor to check if apps run as 32 or 64 bit - simply look at the "Kind" column (you may need to select it under View -> Columns) and see if the app in question is listed as "Intel" i.e. 32 bit or as "Intel (64 bit)".
    While in Activity Monitor you can also check if Pro Tools is close to the 3-4 GB limit of a 32 bit app - if you aren't you will probably not benefit from more RAM.
    Your MacPro (it appears to be a Early 2009 model) should have come with a small booklet showing how to install RAM and what kind of RAM that you need. Any RAM that fulfills the requirements should work but your safest choice is probably to buy from a retailer/online store that supports Macs as they will usually know what kind of RAM you need for your mac model.
    Upgrading the CPUs should be possible, but I haven't seen Apple document how to do this, so you will probably have to google around a bit to find instructions and CPU part numbers.
    Your choice of CPUs will also be limited by the motherboard and CPU socket so you may be limited to faster version of your current CPU chip and some slightly newer versions.
    Going from your current CPU to the fastest version included in the 2009 MacPros would be going from 2.26 GHz to 2.93 GHz. This would only give a modest 30% speed boost. Using newer and highly clocked CPUs might boost this somewhat more maybe to 50% ?

  • Mac Pro 3,1 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 120

    Do The "NVIDIA GeForce GT 120" and the MacPro 3,1 2008 work together?
    The NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 is made for the 2009 MacPro

    Snow Leopard when it came out caused grief and "broke" as in dropped support, for some MacBook Pro owner's external drives.
    10.3.0 Jaguar shipped with a known and fixed bug that was resolved in the testing and GM stage but got shipped and that one DID wipe out Firewire drives on install.
    NTFS drivers (but not Paragon's) have stopped working or not been supported and updated so those using NTFS are a special case and vendors try to get new drivers out when there is a new OS. Trouble has been that for all the testing and early build access, the final product that ships is often far enough different that vendors have felt burned all too often and hold off investing time until they are certain. But many are ready or close to ready.
    It is the old "1.0 is to be avoided" syndrome. Wait for 1.1 or so.
    And always have two or more  backup sets. Anyone that has lost a drive should have a spare and backup (and one set should be on the shelf and safe).
    "Was hoping problem they had was fixed" with a new OS is wishful. But not if there is hardware or file system or a bad install or directory.
    I think I have seen where some Apple GC's just don't have the support and drivers, or support features in a new OS that didn't exist 5-6 years ago.
    Every new OS has improved but often something that was marginal or seemed to work, is pushed off the edge. Which is why that old RAM is now "bad RAM."
    The more specific the easier it is to rule out or find out why. I think we often play "20 Questions" or "Whack a mole" to get to the bottom.

  • ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB

    Does anyone know if 1 ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB uses how much power, because in the new Mac Pro (early 2009) it can't use more than 300W of graphics power consumption. So, i am thinking of getting 4 of those ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB graphics cards (because i'm a real gamer) and stick them all into my new Mac Pro (early 2009)but if it does exceed 300W, then would anyone suggest a powerful gaming graphics card that is both compatible with Mac and Windows as i am planning to get windows vista on boot camp. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 512MB is said to be a very crappy graphics card so i'm saying NO WAY!! to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 512MB.

    Get what you need for OS X, then get a PC card just for Windows. The GT120 might do normal things in OS X and grab whatever you want.... there is 75W and two aux power connectors of 75W each. GTX 275 Nvidia or something perhaps.
    http://www.barefeats.com/nehal07.html

  • Reviews for ATI Radeon HD 4870 Graphics Upgrade Kit for Mac Pro?

    There's no review at the Apple Store on this [ATI Radeon HD 4870 Graphics Upgrade Kit for Mac Pro (Early 2009 or Early 2008)|http://store.apple.com/us/product/MB999ZM/A?fnode=MTY1NDA5OQ&mco=NDE4NDMx OA]. Googled and found nothing related to the Mac kit. Mostly PC based.
    Should I consider this card? I need a spare/replacement graphics card for my Mac Pro (early 2008). The NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT card has failed me twice.

    Just came out on barefeats:
    http://www.barefeats.com/nehal14.html
    Shows new drivers with 285, also compares 4870.
    If you play a lot of games on the windows side, you might also want to consider the 4890. I has recently became flashable (if you're into that kinda thing). It has a lot more leeway to be overclocked. Close to (or if your lucky) hitting the 1 Ghz core clock speed, gives very close comp to the 285, and at fraction of the price. You can get an XFX 4890 on newegg for $195.

  • Incompatibility with ATI Radeon HD 4870

    Hi, using Aperture 3 Trial (I'm waiting the deliver of full one from AppleStore) with few Canon RAW images I've experienced very often crash of the application and two kernel panic (sad), especially using brush tool like skin smoothing:
    0x98c93fc8 : 0x29e44d (0x2113c164 0x1 0x10 0x0)
    Kernel Extensions in backtrace (with dependencies):
    com.apple.ATIRadeonX2000(6.0.6)@0x99753000->0x998adfff
    dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily(2.6)@0x8eea3000
    dependency: com.apple.iokit.IONDRVSupport(2.0)@0x98cfc000
    dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOGraphicsFamily(2.0)@0x98958000
    After that I've tried to replace the ATI Radeon HD 4870 with my old Nvidia 8800 GT and the crashes are disappeared completely, also the kenel panic.
    The 8800GT however is noticeable slower than ATi 4870 and Aperture3 is very slow with ATi, sadly slow with 8800 GT: using brush skin tool with zoom 1:1 (Z key) with color overlay and RAW images give refresh from a stoke to other until about 2 minutes! Unusable.
    Also in that "wait state", activity window always reports: Generating Thumbnails (every says that)
    Sorry to see that, because quality and features in this version are very exciting!
    Maybe most other issues are mainly connected to graphics drivers.

    Before report to Apple I would like to find most precisely the reason for the crashes :/
    In those days I'm going to be crazy...
    Now I've had aperture crash, some time, also in 1920x1200, so maybe resolution is a false positive :/
    The last trials booting in 64 Bit kernel:
    - ATi - Aperture crash during editing RAW file from canon 50D 7D and 5D mark II
    - ATi - No crash editing jpegs
    - ATi - kernel panic on ATi kernel module during editing RAW file from canon 50D 7D and 5D mark II
    - ATi - Black screen and CPU/GPU hang editing jpegs
    - NVidia 8800 - Aperture crash during editing RAW file from canon 50D 7D and 5D mark II (with 64 Bit kernel is a bit faster)
    - NVidia 8800 - no kernel panic
    - NVidia 8800 - no hang editing jpegs
    I've tried editing the same kind of RAW file on the macbook pro 17" C2D and Aperture crashed...
    So, maybe is a combination between RAW file (crash Aperture) and ATi under pressure (kernel panic & hang)
    p.s under macbook pro (ATi Radeon X1600), during edit, often the screen become corrupted
    On macpro, I've tried also 64 Bit kernel and 32 Bit Aperure, but RAW file editing hanged anyway.
    Interesting the use of memory in 64 vs 32 bit, at 64 Bit (Aperture not kernel) editing a 5D mark II RAW file rise the memory up to 6 GB ram !!! in 32 Bit mode the same image and the same filtering reach only 3 GB of ram
    weird

  • ATI Radeon HD 4870 - is it plug & play?

    After few days searching why my Mac Pro (early 2008) was not passing the apple logo icon at start up (just freezing and showing every few seconds an orange color page) I concluded that my Nvidia 8800 was dead.
    My best option here in Belgium is to go for the ATI Radeon HD 4870 but I was wondering how to install it.
    Would the ATI Radeon HD 4870 install itself or do I need an other Graphic card on to be able to see all the process...
    If it doesn't install itself I have to go to some Apple center to do the work (and the 453USD of the card... yes 315 EUROS!!!!!!!)..., I am really scared of the final bill!
    Will my Mac Pro transform in a "very" expensive paper weight!

    Thank you japamac for the links!
    The hatter:
    To be honest I don't know if I have 10.5.7! I usually always do all the update and believe that my Mac Pro is upgraded to 10.5.7. (Because I cannot pass the Apple logo, I cannot check which exact version I have now...)
    Regarding my "dead" graphic card: Is it dead if it still gives me something on the screen even if it is in a "frozen" way!? Usually really dead means dead screen too!?
    My problem is to try to find out by myself because I just don't have the budget for a costly repair (only the graphic card will cost me 400USD).
    My problem started when I was playing Civilazation: the color switched and even the sound started to come out of the internal speaker of my Mac pro!?

  • ATI Radeon HD 4870 1GB for Mac Pro 2.66 Quad Core Xenon

    I have the option of picking up an ATI Radeon HD 4870 1 GB graphics card to go with my soon-to-be-new MAc Pro 2.66 Quad core. I see know that Apple can upgrade to ATI Radeon HD 4870 512MB, but that card is not available to me at the moment. Will the 1GB do the job without overheating the system? Am new to the Mac Pros. Need it for the Windows gaming portion of the system. Am using the rest for graphics and photography.

    If the MAc Pro 2.66 comes with Snow Leopard, why would I have to upgrade my OS?
    OK. So, if got the MAc version, it would work A-OK without overheating?
    Thanks for your input!

  • Early 2008 Mac Pro + ATI Radeon HD 4870 = Not working

    Just took delivery of my new HD 4870 video card today. I installed it in my Early 2008 Mac Pro and booted up. I got a picture no problem on one monitor, but nothing on the other. Furthermore, the display perfpane was missing a lot of controls, like Arrangement and Detect Displays and whatnot.
    I did a bunch of rebooting and swapping of cables, and determined that both the mini-display port and the standard DVI connection will drive a monitor. However, if both are plugged in, the only active display is the one plugged into the mini-display port, and there's no option to setup the secondary display.
    So I booted into bootcamp, and it automatically recognized both display ports, and mirrored my desktop on both monitors. I downloaded and installed the latest windows drivers, rebooted the machine into windows once more, and was able to configure a multiple monitor display with no problem.
    This tells me it's not the card and it's not the motherboard.
    Booting back into mac OS, I discovered that it doesn't even recognize that the card has video ram. It thought I had no video ram in the system.
    So, this all leads me to the conclusion that Apple shipped me a card that it has not yet provided driver support for.
    Hey Apple, can I have my 4870 display driver now?

    Hi again,
    It was funny to read all your answers on my iPhone while away from my computer. I could have reply on the iPhone but I preferred to wait to give you all the procedure I used to install the beta driver successfully this morning.
    To start, I found this link:
    http://www.insanelymac.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=155477
    and followed the "4870 INSTRUCTIONS", starting like suggested by doing the "First, follow the 4850 INSTRUCTIONS above"... (See the link)
    I would like also to specify that I did this without having installed the card physically yet. So I kept my HD 2600 in the computer, followed all the steps excepted for the step 3:
    3. Reboot with -f -v (kextcache/verbose mode)
    There is no -f nor -v switches available for the reboot command at the shell prompt. I simply rebooted as usual "Pomme -> Redémarrer".
    After the reboot, all my software was still working as expected with my HD 2600 card, meaning that these steps are specific and active only for the HD 4870 when it's detected at boot-up.
    You may have to Google for the string "Kext" in order to get the application to install the file ATY_Motmot.kext. For your information, ATY_Motmot filename is the same string as the one found under "System Information ->PCI cards" under "Name".
    I get:
    ATI Radeon HD 4870:
    Name: ATY, Motmot
    The article is not clear regarding where to find the OpenGL.framework to backup before installing the downloaded one. I found mine under:
    /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk/System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL.framework
    After having shutdown the computer, just after the reboot that proofed everything was ok, I removed the original HD 2600 card and put back the new HD 4870 and boot up...
    Then I check the "System Information" and found both "Quartz Extreme" and "Core image" supported!
    I launched Aperture, got it!
    I launched Final Cut Express, got it!
    I launched Starry Night Pro Plus, got it! Then I checked the OpenGL settings in Starry Night Pro PLus and activated both options:
    Use shaders where available
    Use AllSky shader (Not compatible with all hardware)
    When I was doing these actions with my original HD 2600 card, the software was giving me a warning that my hardware did not support these options and that it could crash.
    This time, with the HD 4870, it accepted my settings and give me back a very beautiful blue sky with much more shades!
    So in conclusion, it works very smoothtly with my system and I am writing this with two monitors, having bought the MiniDP to DVI adapter this afternoon
    I am happy!
    P.S.: A girl from Apple support called me back this afternoon regarding my problem. She was very happy two when I told her that I did apply the beta driver and that it was working very well...
    Good luck and best regards...

  • ATI Radeon HD 4870 vs ATI Radeon HD 5870

    I have an early 2009 Mac Pro with 8 cores and the upgraded ATI Radeon HD 4870 graphics card. I see that the 2010 Mac Pros have an option for the ATI Radeon HD 5870. Apparently this card will eventually be available as a kit that will work in my computer.
    Do you think there will be a significant performance boost using the 5870 over the 4870 with Aperture if I purchase this upgrade? Apple says the 5870 is great for "motion graphics, 3D modeling, rendering, or animation", but not sure if I should expect much improvement using it with Aperture. I am pretty happy with the 4870, so don't want to spend the cash for minimal improvement.
    Any thoughts or speculation?
    Thanks,
    Dave

    No response here, but I posted the same question on the Apple Store Product page for the 5870 kit and received the following reply:
    "You won't see a noticeable difference unless you are running heavy 3D applications or gaming. What I would suggest if you want to see an improvement in Aperture 3 is to add more ram to your mac (have at least 8 Gigabytes of ram ) boot up your mac to 64 bit (if running Mac OS 10.6) and run Aperture 3."
    This supports my suspicions that this card may not be much of an improvement for Aperture users that currently use the ATI 4870.

  • Ati Radeon HD 4870 out of order?

    Hi folks,
    im using a mac pro 1.1 with an ati radeon hd 4870 since aprox. one year without troubles.
    since two weeks i habve the problem, that when i start the machine the fan of the graphik card is very loud, the power led is blinking and there is no starting at all. First i thought it would be the ram/ or riser cards. Then i installed the old graphik card (Nvida Model no P345 that one came with the computer) - and everything was ok. so i think the problem is NOT the ram. (am i right?).
    My Problem FCP X is not working with this card (too slow)
    Did anybody have the same trouble with that graphic card? is the gpu out of order? please help
    This is my first post in any forum concerning computer-problems. sorry for my bad english, i´m german
    thanks for your answers (which i long for)

    ATI Radeon 5770
    http://store.apple.com/us/product/MC742ZM/A
    http://www.amazon.com/Apple-ATI-Radeon-5770-MC742ZM/dp/B003Z6QH6M 
    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/726537-REG/Apple_MC742ZM_A_ATI_Radeon_HD_5 770.html
    How To Install and Remove Memory Mac Pro
    https://support.apple.com/kb/HT4433
    2x2GB FBDIMM DDR2 667MHz @ $32
    http://www.amazon.com/BUFFERED-PC2-5300-FB-DIMM-APPLE-Memory/dp/B002ORUUAC/
    Those 512s fail. They are 7 yrs old. They were not as well engineered at what is being made and sold now, in the last year. These I use (1,1 8x2GB) are not just fine they are great (run 10-15*C colder)
    You should use Temperature Monitor to see what thermal and other sensors report, fan speeds, temps of DIMMs (over 70*C is not good contrary to early reports).
    Temperature Monitor
    https://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/12381/temperature-monitor
    http://www.bresink.com/osx/HardwareMonitor.html
    SMCFanControl 2.4+
    https://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/23049/smcfancontrol

Maybe you are looking for

  • Using Azure internal load balancer (ILB) for Sql Reporting Services

    I am attempting to implement a scale-out SSRS deployment using the Azure ILB feature. I have created 2 Sql Reporting servers using the azure images and have created a ILB endpoint on both servers.  I am then attempting to access the servers via the I

  • How to programmatically close/minimize my app

    Hi, How to programmatically close/minimize my app. Regards Symadept

  • Xalan and EXSLT problems - namespace issue?

    Hi all, I have some code that runs fine when using some older Xalan libraries: import org.apache.xalan.extensions.ExpressionContext; import org.apache.xpath.NodeSet;I was trying to upgrade to use the latest libraries (from what I understand are inclu

  • Error in Configure JMSAdmin utililty

    Hi, I have installed IBM MQ Series 5.3 on windows XP. I am attempting to use JMSAdmin to configure my qcf and queues that my applications will talk to. When I run JMSAdmin and try to create my qcf I get unable to bind object. InitCtx> define QCF(samp

  • R/3 to XI configuration

    Hi I am new to ALE-IDOC.I had a requirement to establish connectivity to XI system from the R/3 system.Can I got a blog or document which serves my purpose.If so please povide me the link.I also need to send master data from R/3 to XI and viceversa.