NVidia Quadro FX 4800

Thank the gods - and Barefeats! Save your cash :-))
http://www.barefeats.com/nehal10.html

I cant help thinking that nVidia are totally out of their depth with this one. I hope evga's offering in June will be a lot better than this, otherwise its a 4870 for me as well!

Similar Messages

Is Apple 27in Cinema display compatible with NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 for Mac?

Can anyone tell me whether the new Apple 27inch Cinema display will work with the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 for Mac? I will use this on a MacPro with 2.66GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon “Westmere” and CS5 (Adobe recommends the NVIDIA). It seems incredible that it doesn't for whatever reason.
Thanks
James

You will need a dual-link DVI to Mini DisplayPort converter.
<http://www.atlona.com/Atlona-Dual-Link-DVI-to-Mini-DisplayPort-Converter-USB-Po wered.html>

PP CS6 doesn't recognize my Quadro FX 4800 for Mac graphics card but my trial PP CC does. When I open CS6 the Mercury Playback engine is grayed out. In PP CC the Mercury Playback engine is not Grayed out. I have the latest Nvidia driver & Cuda driver. Do

I installed PP CS6 on a Mac OS 10.10.2, installed latest drivers for Nvidia Quadro FX 4800 graphic card including Cuda driver. The Mercury Playback Engine is grayed out. But when I open an installed trial version of PP CC the Mercury Playback engine is not grayed out. Do I have a problem with CS6 software?? Thanks for any input you can offer.

If your nVidia card has at least 1Gig of video ram, use the nVidia Hack http://forums.adobe.com/thread/629557 - which is a simple entry in a "supported cards" file - and Mac http://www.vidmuze.com/how-to-enable-gpu-cuda-in-adobe-cs6-for-mac/

Mercury playback is always greyed out in Quadro FX 4800 + GTX 260

Hi guys,
As the title mentioned above, I have two cards installed on Win 7 64-bits. The Quadro FX 4800 is for main video card, and the GTX 260 is for the Physx only. I tried to manully assign the Physx to FX 4800 but it didn't work. Could you guys please advise me what should I do? Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Margirbee

If you have the Nvidia 258.xx or higher Nvidia drivers, then there is a CUDA GPU listing under manage 3D settings. There is a global selection and individual application setting for that. The default setting for that is all GPU's. Select that under the Global and uncheck the 260 GPU. That should fix the problem.
Eric
ADK

Adobe Premiere Cs6 Windows freezes with Tesla M2090 and Quadro FX 4800

Premiere works firn with the Quadro FX 4800 in Windows. But I bought a Tesla M2090 and it loses all power. For example a video cannpy be displayed on the monitor screen and if you try to play it on the porgram window, it freezes the whole application. It has to be killed.
I wonder if anybody ever tested this card. It passes all tests (the M2090) from the Cusa Toolkit.
Maybe somebody knows a utility to test the Tesla and see if it really works as expected.
I can open a technical support ticket if it makes sense.
Update: I moved the Quadro FX and Tesla to a MAC, there is no advantages on speed when exporting a movie. Isn't Premiere supposed to work faster with a Tesla on Mac as well. That is what they told me in tech support. The M2090 does not work in Windows, and in a Mac is not taken into consideration, I guess since Nvidia did not write a Mac driver for this card and it still uses a generic CUDA driver
I am despondent over this. Adobe support gave me wrong information.

It is explicitly stated Tesla C2070/2075 and a Quadro card only to achieve a Maxumus configuration, not a very old FX card. Given the limited number of CUDA cores in the Tesla card and the limited bandwidth, the first Maximus results are far from appealing. A Quadro 6000 + Tesla C2075 (€ 6000) is slower than a GTX 570 for a fraction of the price (€ 270). Talk about BFTB.
From the documentation I have found about the M2090, for a whopping € 4800, it requires Windows Server 2008, is still based on the Fermi architecture and has the same number of cores as a 580, but less bandwidth.

NVidia Quadro 4000 First Impressions

I've seen some questions and some discussion regarding the nVidia Quadro 4000 card. Mine arrived yesterday, I figured I would share my initial experiences with it to help give others guidance so they can make the best decisions for their own needs.
First off, if your primary interest (or a significant interest) is playing games, than a Quadro card is not for you. nVidia's high end cards are fine-tuned on both a hardware and software (driver) level in the needs of pro apps and manipulating very large data sets. It happens at the expense of some performance stats that matter to gamers. Quadro cards aren't designed to get you a higher fps in your favorite shooter, they're designed to get you better performance with ray-tracing, real-time 3D environments, and scientific use. I'll leave you to surf to nVidia's web site for more marketing speak on that. In my initial tests, I found that to be completely true. I don't do much gaming, but the couple games I tested performed no faster than the GTX-285 I had in the machine before.
Attempting to run some more tests, I found that RealTech VR's OpenGL extensions viewer (which has some decidedly gamer-centric benchmarks) showed little to no improvement over the GTX-285 (as expected).
Running a few test renders in Cinema 4D, I found only about a 5-7% increase in performance. That might be due to immature drivers, but it may also be due to C4D renders being more about CPU mucle (Maxon doesn't have any specific CUDA-support or acceleration). What I did notice was that moving/camming around in the app was much improved. I couldn't say if that had to do with an extra gigabyte of vram, or if it was some kind of 'Fermi' magic (Fermi's the name of this generation chip technology from nVidia).
I have not yet gotten the chance to give Adobe CS5 (and specifically Premiere Pro and After Effects) a serious workout, though just playing around I noticed that the Quadro card had much more capacity for handling multiple layers of video in real time (I threw a dozen videos onto a main track in varying sizes of 'picture-in-picture' display, and arbitrarily adjusted the speed of some and color corrected others). It handled everything I could throw at it without appearing to break into a sweat, and I haven't yet had time to give it a proper performance test.
Being an early adopter, I have the expectation that on initial release there will be kinks and hiccups, and that as the drivers mature the performance will improve dramatically. Based on discussions with colleagues and what I've seen in reviews, this has been the case with both the GTX-285 and the Quadro FX 4800 card, and probably was also the case on older nVidia cards as well. The Quadro 4000 met those expectations - it feels like this is still a work in progress. The drivers (version 256.01.00f03) are stable (no crashes, no kernel panics, no horrible situations to speak of), but based on my early results I'd guess that they're not optimized for speed, either. On the Windows side, nVidia has driver version 259 available as a 'certified' release, and a higher performance version 260 available, and performance under Windows 7 Professional (64-bit) seems better. To be fair, the card's been on the market for PC's since late July, those drivers are more mature.
I still need to give the card a serious workout with Adobe CS5, but so far things look promising. Anecdotally, I've also noticed that system performance is greatly improved when I'm doing lots of multi-tasking. I often have several different apps running at once, and between the new technology and the additional video memory (my old card had 1GB, this has 2GB), I find I can juggle 20+ apps and dozens of Safari windows/tabs running without the Mac Pro batting an eyelash. That's hard to quantify in a specific benchmark, but it's very welcome considering the way I tend to work.
As the drivers improve, and as my own workflow evolves to make more use of larger datasets and more complex 3D scenes, I see the Quadro 4000 really starting to shine. Heavy-duty CUDA users may be happy to know that this card only requires a single additional power connection, which means that you can install two of these cards into a single Mac Pro (for a total of 512 CUDA cores). If you're doing big scientific work or working with CUDA-supported ray tracing (or other plugins), or doing extremely elaborate things with RED camera footage, that may likely be a game-changer for you. For me, it'll likely be quite some time before I outgrow what this card can do.

As I'd mentioned in another thread, the card began shipping last week. I expect that it will take a couple months before places like Apple and Amazon to dig through the large number of backorders they have (I don't think this card is produced in mass quantity, even on the PC side).
My system setup is a Mac Pro 8x2.26GHz, 32GB RAM, 8TB HD storage, nVidia Quadro 4000 2GB driving the primary display, and nVidia GT120 driving a secondary display. I'm considering getting third party power supply unit that sits in the second optical drive bay, and would plug into the Mac Pro's power supply, and then provide additional power supply connectors that would allow me to plug in my GTX-285 as a secondary graphics card (since it uses 2 connectors, and the Mac Pro only has 2 total).
Even when my machine was using a GTX-285 and the GT-120, I could see a difference in performance when dragging an application window (particularly if it's a 3D app) from main display to the secondary (the GT-120 is a significantly lower power card, with only 32 CUDA cores and 512MB video memory). With the Quadro driving my primary display the difference is much more noticeable now.
From what I understand, there are some technical issues with using ATI and nVidia GPU's in the same machine, so attempting to use with a 5770 may not work. But if you were able to use them together, it would make more sense to have the Quadro card driving your primary display, since it's likely going to perform as well or better than any other card you might be able to pair it with.
I've already given some thought to a second Quadro card down the road. As the drivers mature, and the apps I use evolve to make better use of CUDA and OpenCL, and my own workflow and skills improve to the point where I'm doing more 3D modeling/rendering (and stuff like ray-tracing), then having 2 of these cards in a single machine could really come in handy. Today it appears that all those CUDA cores and VRAM are serving to help make the apps faster and more responsive at design time, but rendering is still very CPU-centric. But tomorrow those apps will hopefully be able to tap into the GPU to help improve render times.

If I upgade to my macpro 3,1 with a video card Nvidia Quadro FX 4801 can I still use my Cinema HD Display? Will I need an adaptor?

My video card ATI Radeon 2600 is sick. Works only some days. I would like to upgrade to Nvidia Quadro FX 4801 but it looks like it might have different video connections. I would like to continue to use my 2008 Cinema HD Display. Are these items complatable?

https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2662687?start=0&tstart=0
You don't need to spend $400, the 5770 will do fine, or I would go with Apple 5870 $449
Barefeats isn't testing the 4800 in any of their tests or since about 2009 before the 5770/5870 came out and the Quadro 4000.
But you can interpolate comparing where it sits to 8800 and others
http://www.barefeats.com/nehal10.html
Using DVI is not an issue. Not with any graphic cards.

Caution, nVIDIA Quadro FX cards may not support DirextX 11

Anyone thinking or acquiring any of these cards be careful if DirectX 11 is something you will need in the future.
During September when researching the Quadro FX cards one of my criteria was that it supports DirectX 11.
At that time their latest driver version indicated it does support DirectX 11. Only recently when running a program that requires it did I find out the card does not support DirectX 11 !
So now I've got to look at something else to replace this card. Anyone here want it?
Not so cheerful,
Michael

The card in question is the Quadro FX 3800.
However, my colleague has the Quadro FX 4800 and will run into the same problem.
Regarding running the DirectX update from Microsoft, the answer is yes I did.
The NVIDA Customer Care representative's response was as follows (I really wish one could copy and paste this):
"I apologize for the inconvenience. I must add though that the 259.81 Driver Package is generic to a lot of devices. The idea behind this is to streamline the process of driver packaging. Whilst the 259.81 drivers support DX 11 it requires a card to support DX 11 to work successfully."
Checking NVIDIA's product lineup this means only the 5000 series and up support DirectX 11.
What disturbes me, that there is no mention in the driver's web site description indicating this card is excluded. To the contrary it is listed as being included!
As well the fact that this "customer care" representative alludes to my incompitence in not checking the specifications...
Cheers
Michael

NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT vs. NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M?

I just have a PC vs. Mac question, as I am looking at the new MacBook Pros. Which of the following NVIDIA processors is the best for intense graphic applications? Why does Mac only have 1 option, and is it superior to the PC options?
PC
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
NVIDIA QUADRO NVS 140M
Mac
NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT
Many thanks!

what do you want to do with such devices, work, play, and specifically which software?
usability is often ignored by people who get swayed by paper-based specs, and it is important to know what you are going to do with a machine before making up your mind, not just which processor and hardware has a .01 percent coolness factor above the other.
I am somewhat biased, for I have developed an intense distrust, disenchantment, and pretty much an aversion to what you would call "PC" software and OSes. Twenty years of DOS and Windows have left me no fond memory, if not for the fact that I know how to fix a lot of software and hardware problems (you learn when you are constantly confronted to problems, and problems abound in the world of Windows).
A Macbook Pro is a beautiful machine, and it is hassle free a good 90%+ of the time, you can install Windows if you must anyhow, but Apple doesn't sell for cheap. Mind you, most high-end PCs do not cost much less anyhow, just the low end ones.
The 8600M GT card supports DirectX 10, can play even Crysis on a 32-bit Windows version very well (I play it from time to time, beautiful), but it isn't a 8800 card, nor is it the best card in all of laptop PCs. I do consider the Macbook Pro a desktop replacement, and I have very intensive use of my machine (scientific software for academics and industry, video games, multimedia, you name it).
So if you must play the latest game, and I mean the latest, with the highest frame-per-second count of all your friends, don't go for a 8600M GT, (ii) for a laptop anyways (laptop were never, never meant to compete with desktop-grade hardware, no matter what you local wise arses will tell you), and (iii) buy a console instead. BUT, if you want to play most games, very well, and you are concerned with media editing, usability, stability, reliability, etc., a Macbook Pro is a beautiful thing to have...
Cordially,
Dr Sly

Kernel Panic Nvidia Quadro Pro 4000 CC14 MAC PRO 10.9.4 mavericks

I get kernels panics constantly when using CC14 lightroom and photoshop.. And this is causing me to loose thousands of dollars. I have searched for months have lost thousands of dollars in work, have trued to contact support only to be sent to community forums which i get no response...o
THEREFORE.....
Allow me to waste more time by contacting this unresponsive company.
i constantly get Kernel Panics when using CC14 associated with my NVIDIA Quadro 4000 2048 while using cc14 photoshop and lightroom since I updated to Maverick 10.9.4.
I have been searching for fixes for months, i have updated everything, every driver, and this has costed me THOUSANDS of dollars in pay i am unable to receive because my %^&* computer keeps crashing.
Now i am pissed! I have consulted APPLE and even after pushing me up to the top level. they still read off a piece of paper. ! i just wanted to go back to osx before mavericks which i was having NO ISSUES but no one seem to have a clue at apple how to even turn one on.
1. i am NOT doing a master restore and I NEVER had a problem before Mavericks and CC14!!!
2. Every driver is updated every firmware is updated
3. there is NOTHING RUNNING IN HTE BACKGROUND
4. i did an smc and reset pram
5. ran disk utility -- no problems
6. searched for answers for months.
7. and by the way..... photoshop cc14 does not save your work on a crash. it saves what you already saved
I AM TIRED OF WASTING MY TIME TRYING TO GET ANSWERS WHEN I ONLY GET IGNORED.
this is an issue with my nvidia quadro pro 4000 video card and -- adobe and - mavericks.
MY system is high end, mac pro 5,1 Processor 2 x 2.93 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon Late 2010 20 gig ram, quadro pro 4000 and an APPLE SSD TS512B
solid state
and i spent 10 gran on this system. I am a professional and this is my BUSINESS... my only income. not a kid playing games.
The video card was over a 1000.00! Nvidia? ADOBE?
This needs to be fixed. this is my livelihood

Thanks for responding....of course I mean adobe. A community forum is NOT a company.
I read the link to the thread and this person says an application CANNOT cause kernel panics -- well Apple begs to differ. http://support.apple.com/kb/PH14063
I have my own photography studio, ive spent over a half million dollars on my education (2 masters degrees) my equipment, and traveling the world to various workshops. I spend some evening researching new technology to stay on top of my craft but what I dont do and dont have time to do is follow forums regularly.
Therefore i dont know that this person has repeatedly said the same thing over and over in different threads about applications causing KP.
You suggested that I take my trouble shooting somewhere else...trust me this is not the first place ive tried to get answer.s I have been trying to resolve this issue since i updated to 10.9.4 and CC 14 and Nvidia Quadro pro 4000. It has been months of phone calls research, forums, talking to anyone i know that knows anything and I have lost thousands of dollars. My digital lab ran perfect before the updates.
so......
First...I DISAGREE with the guy in the thread because what he wrote is just his opinion. It doesnt matter wjho he works for, it a person converses a fact with NO REFERENCES then it looses credibility. I always include a reference when I make a statement to anyone
second: as i said in my discussion -- i have done everything and the only time i get kernel panics is when using photoshop - nothing else running in the background, and the issue is with the video card drivers , 10.9.4 and photoshop and lightroom CC14.
lastly; I know my video card is fine because Ive had photoshoots where i tethered (as I alwasy do) to Phocus software for my Hasselblad H4d and there is never a crash or kernel panic issue. ever.
I ONLY GET KERNEL PANICS WHEN I USE ADOBE PHOTOSHOP OR LIGHTROOM CC14 AND IT HAS ONLY HAPPENED SINCE I UPDATED TO 10.9.4 AND CC14
apple told me to do a restore -- they were just reading me what they were supposed to say.

I need to connect my LED cinema display to nvidia quadro 4000 graphics card

I cant find any adapter to connect my "LED cinema display" to the brand new graphics card "nvidia quadro 4000 (for Mac pro)"
As i coldnt find any information since now, ihope someone can give me a hint.

They included the wrong DisplayPort to Mini DisplayPort adapter. The correct adapter should have a female Mini DisplayPort connector, not male. You could buy the correct adapter or you could add a F-F Mini DisplayPort coupler
<http://www.monoprice.com/products/product.asp?c_id=104&cp_id=10428&cs_id=1042804 &p_id=6502&seq=1&format=2>
Try calling the, and asking for the correct adapter. They fo say:
"Connect to mini-DisplayPort displays through the included adapter cable"
<http://store.apple.com/us/product/H3314LL/A/nvidia-quadro-4000-for-mac>

NVidia Quadro 4500 for mac and pc question

I am thinking of purchasing a new Mac Pro 3.0GHz Quad-Core desktop with the nVidia Quadro 4500 graphics card. I want to run Solidworks on Windows XP SP2 and also be able to boot into Mac OS X. I have done hours of research trying to make sure it will work but can't seem to find any posts that suggest my system will work as I intend.
I have found out that the nVidia Quadro 4500 needs to configured for the mac (firmware) and that you just can't buy one from eBay and install it. There are PC versions and Mac versions. Also, flashing it to work with a mac is very difficult and may damage the card if you get it wrong. Not something I want to do.
So, my question is: If I buy this Mac Pro from Apple with the nVidia Quadro 4500 card already installed, will I have any problems with it working on the window side of things when I boot into Windows XP? Does anyone have the setup that I am talking about and also running SolidWorks on the Windows side?
Thanks in advance for any help you can give me.
Yee Ha!

Hi,
Mac OS X Leopard has Boot Camp included with the software. I have read online (Apple site amongst others) the BootCamp bundled with Leopard has all the drivers for Windows included, so you no longer need to create a disc with the drivers needed for Windows (as you did under the BootCamp beta version).
That being the case, Leopard should have the required drivers for your Quadro FX 4500 to function under Windows.
See here for details:
http://www.apple.com/uk/macosx/features/bootcamp.html
Hope this helps

Can I install nvidia quadro 600/ AMD FirePro V4900 (ATI FireGL) on HPE h8-1220t ?

HP/Nvidia Quadro 600 graphics card hangs w/ blue hp startp screen after installation into HPE h8-1220t.
Error: After installation and startup, just it sounds a 'beep' and after a minute, it beeps again. No further progess w/ HP blue screen.
Notes: Card spec
nVIdia Quadro 600 by pny
Frame Buffer Memory 1 GB DDR3 Memory Interface 128-bit Memory Bandwidth 25.6 GB/s CUDA parallel processing cores 96 Max Power Consumption 40 W Energy Star Compliant Yes Physical Dimensions 2.713" H x 6.60" L Single Slot Low Profile Form Factor Yes Display Connectors DVI-I (1), DP (1) Number of Displays Supported 2 DisplayPort Yes DVI Yes VGA Yes Graphics Bus PCI Express 2.0 x16 Thermal Solution Active 3D Vision Pro Support Via USB Warranty 3 Year Warranty PNY Part # VCQ600-PB
I contacted both HP and PNY customer support. They've not found any solution yet.
Only the suggestion I heard from HP customer support is change the graphic card w/ PCIe 3.0 support.
I believe PCI slot should be backward compatible w/ 2.0 version.
Does it really matter install PCIe2.0 graphic board on 3.0 slot?
My ohter option is AMD FirePRo V4900, which is one of the certified graphic card for the Autodesk.
However, I'm not sure wether it works with this machine.
Please give me an answer.
Kyoo

masterqueue wrote:
HP/Nvidia Quadro 600 graphics card hangs w/ blue hp startp screen after installation into HPE h8-1220t.
Error: After installation and startup, just it sounds a 'beep' and after a minute, it beeps again. No further progess w/ HP blue screen.
Notes: Card spec
nVIdia Quadro 600 by pny
Frame Buffer Memory 1 GB DDR3 Memory Interface 128-bit Memory Bandwidth 25.6 GB/s CUDA parallel processing cores 96 Max Power Consumption 40 W Energy Star Compliant Yes Physical Dimensions 2.713" H x 6.60" L Single Slot Low Profile Form Factor Yes Display Connectors DVI-I (1), DP (1) Number of Displays Supported 2 DisplayPort Yes DVI Yes VGA Yes Graphics Bus PCI Express 2.0 x16 Thermal Solution Active 3D Vision Pro Support Via USB Warranty 3 Year Warranty PNY Part # VCQ600-PB
I contacted both HP and PNY customer support. They've not found any solution yet.
Only the suggestion I heard from HP customer support is change the graphic card w/ PCIe 3.0 support.
I believe PCI slot should be backward compatible w/ 2.0 version.
Does it really matter install PCIe2.0 graphic board on 3.0 slot?
My ohter option is AMD FirePRo V4900, which is one of the certified graphic card for the Autodesk.
However, I'm not sure wether it works with this machine.
Please give me an answer.
Kyoo
Hello masterqueue.
This desktop was a CTO (Configured-to-Order) model. As such, there is a lot of information I do not know about the machine. Most importantly, how large is the power supply? According to the computer's specification page it could have anywhere from a 300 watt to a 600 watt power supply. That is a very big difference.
I'll keep an eye out for your response. Have a great day.
Please click the white star under my name to give me Kudos as a way to say "Thanks!"
Click the "Accept as Solution" button if I resolve your issue.

Update of photoshop CC - trouble with NVIDIA Quadro 1000M display driver. PS freezes

Hey guys,
Since today I've got trouble with my PS CC.
I've updated PS CC yesterday 2014-12-12.
I was doing some drawings today and two times PS freezes during switching layers of or selecting a mask.
A message appeared that there was trouble with the display driver an PS switched off the GPU support because of that issue.
Ok, I thought let's update the display driver and so I've done today. I switched to actual NVIDIA display driver version 314.21
I'm working with an NVIDIA Quadro 1000M on a DELL mobile Workstation Precision M4600 with 8 GB RAM.
Now when I start up PS and press alt+k, my 2 displays showing a black screen for 1-2 seconds.
After closing the general setup window again black screen for 1-2 sec and the top menu bar is showing no entries.
When I move the mouse pointer over the bar, the menus appear again. But the bar is like transparent at the parts where no menues are.
When I unlock the window from the screen an put it back fitting to the screen everything looks like normal.
Till today I hadn't any problem with my notebook in that kind of way.
Maybe someone has or had similar problems.
Would be nice if someone can help me.
thanks

Oh, that sounds very bad. It's not that bad for me. It's not crashing that often at the moment, only black screens at start up or if setting dialog is opened. But I will see tomorrow how often it will crash, during today it crashed 2 times when doing some ridiculous simple actions like switchid to another layer and the other time when trying to edit an mask layer. I will contact the support chat on monday regarding this issue. Maybe there is a solution or an update soon... I keep may fingers crossed for you.

Driver please! NVidia Quadro NVS 140M Windows 7 64-bit

Installed Windows 7 RTM (Professional, x64) on my T61. Surprise! There's no driver for my NVidia Quadro NVS 140M, and I can't install the one that I downloaded from NVidia. I'm stuck in 1024x768. Ouch!
What's the plan, Stan?
If there are any driver hackers out there who could help me install NVidia's driver, please speak up.

I'm running now using the NVidia-provided driver for Windows 7 x64. I was able to install it by running the installer in Vista compatibility mode.
For Windows 7 newbies, the specific steps are:
* Download the installer (186.81_notebook_win7_winvista_64bit_international_whql.exe)
* Run this file to extract the files to C:\DRIVERS\WIN\VIDEO
* For the two files nvudisp.exe and setup.exe in C:\DRIVERS\WIN\VIDEO, do the following:
* Right-click the file, select Properties.
* Click the Compatibility tab
* Check the box for "Run this program in compatibility mode for:" Select "Windows Vista (Service Pack 2)
* Click OK.
Then double-click setup.exe to run it.
So far this is working for me.

NVidia Quadro FX 4800

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for