NWDI version compatibility

Hi,
Does anyone know if there are any version compatibility constraints developing Java WebDynpro applications on an NWDI (WAS6.40) for deployment on a WAS7.00 instance (e.g. JDK's)?
I've yet to find a general recommendation similar to that seen for SLD (i.e. keep in line with the highest WAS version on the estate) or any clear documentation on version compatibility across WAS stacks with respect to NWDI.
We have a highly complex landscape with multiple component/ product versions, and we'd prefer to have a singel central NWDI instance, but I'm not sure if this is practical and/ or possible.
Any pointers/ documentation/ comments gratefully received
Cheers
Neil

While I can't remember where I've seen it, SAP does recommend that the DI always be kept patched to the latest levels, regardless of what version your landscape (or pieces thereof ) is at.
So, as long as your DI is at patched to at least the same level as your most 'advanced' system, you should not have any problem. You should also match your Developer Studio to the same level as your target system to avoid using any plug-ins that offer features not offered by the eventual runtime system. Yes, the required libraries will be ok (as long as you configure the SLD and the associated track correctly), but the Developer Studio itself needs to be matched up.
Hope that makes sense.

Similar Messages

Version compatibility of 10G Application Server 10.1.2.0.2 with JDK 1.5.

hi buddies,
I want to know that whether
10G Application Server 10.1.2.0.2 with JDK 1.5. is Version compatibility
pls do send ur replies if known to you.

Hi ,
As far as I know AS 10.1.2.0.2 is Not certified with JDK 1.5.
Please see below some links where you can double-check this
1. OC4J with JDK 1.5 JSP compilation error
2. http://docs.huihoo.com/oracle/docs/B14099_19/web.1012/b14011/chap1.htm
"Only the JDK 1.3.1 and JDK 1.4 compilers are supported and certified by OC4J. It is possible to specify an alternative compiler by adding a <java-compiler> element to the server.xml file, and this might provide a workaround for the "classes not in packages" issue, but no other compilers are certified or supported by Oracle for use with OC4J."
3. "Certified JDKs" from
http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/ias/files/as_certification_r2_101202.html
BR,
Mihai

Need latest SLD and NWDI version for PI 7.1 EHP1

Can any one update me the latest SLD and NWDI version for PI 7.1 EHP1?
Kindly provide me the path of implementation guides for SLD, NWDI which can be used with PI 7.1 EHP1. For PI 7.1 EHP1, can we use the same version of SLD and NWDI which used IN PI 7.1?
Please help me for the above questions.
Regards,
Yuvaraj.

Hi Yuvaraj,
Please check the NWDI Development Infrastructure 7.11 and SLD 7.11 for the PI 7.1 EHP1.
Go to Service Market Place - Software Download > Support Packages and Patches > Support Packages and Patches - Entry by Application Group > SAP NetWeaver and complementary products > SAP NETWEAVER PI > SAP EHP1 FOR SAP NW PI 7.1 >Entry by Component > Development Infrastructure.
Hope it will helps
Regards
Arun Jaiswal

Version compatibility for installing WLS and ADR for ADF 11.1.2.0

Hi,
Can anyone pls let me know what versions of Weblogic server, Application Development Runtime (ADR) is required to install Oracle JDeveloper 11.1.2.0
B'coz currently I am trying to install Weblogic server, ADR and ADF separately and try to deploy and publish an application in ADF 11.1.2.0 verison.
I am trying this for the past 4 days, but still can't deploy an application successfully in ADF 11.1.2.0 version. Pls let me know the version compatibility.
Thanks,
Aparna

Hi John,
Even I saw the link that u had mentioned. From where can I install these ?
I had downloaded WLS 10.3.5 and ADR 11.1.1.5 separately. But from where do I install the patch ?? I didn't find a proper source to download.
Pls help.
Thanks,
Aparna

Photoshop Extended version compatability

I have Photoshop CS3 Extended on both PC (Windows XP) and Mac (OS X Leopard). I'm able to upgrade the PC to CS5 Extended but not the Mac.
My questions are:
1 - Will Photoshop CS5 extended work on Windows XP?
2 - Are CS3 and CS5 backwards compatible - if I work on a document in PC CS5 will the Mac CS5 version be able to open it? I know there will be some things that would not translate backwards, such as Puppet Warp and some of the newer masking and layers features, but I'd still like to be able to work on more basic functions of masking, cloning, etc. on both computers.
Thanks for any help,
Marcy

Noel Car boni wrote:
For the most part, a document saved from Photoshop CS5 will be no problem to open in CS3. There's a "Maximize Compatibility" setting in Edit - Preferences - File Handling section that you'll want to set to "Always".
-Noel
My take is that the compatibility setting should be set based on the kind of work one does. I have it set to "Never". When you check this setting ON you tell Photoshop to save along with all your layers another entity, which is a flattened version of the image. This, makes every PSD file you save larger by a non trival amount.
So this setting should have no effect regarding Photoshop to Photoshop version compatibility. All Photoshop versions understand layers and do not need a flattened version. It's intended to maximize the compatibility between Photoshop and any other program that does not know about layers but reads PSD files. If you have many of your PSD files going to, for example, Lightroom or Premiere then set it to "Always". If not, you can set it to "Ask" or "Never" and save yourself a lot of storage space.
Paulo

Re: (forte-users) C++ version compatibility question. Fortev30L2 on D

Dirk:
I ran into a similar problem. I added an other flag to my fcompile script and
it seems to be working fine, your mileage may vary. The flag was
-cflags "-oldcxx only"
Dwayne Kryger
"Haben, Dirk" <[email protected]> on 08/25/99 02:09:16 AM
To: "'Soapbox Forte Users'" <[email protected]>
cc: (bcc: Dwayne Kryger/SEH)
Subject: (forte-users) C++ version compatibility question. Forte v30L2 on
Digital Unix 4 d and C++ version ???
G'day Folxs
Just installed Forte as a Simple Server on a Digital UNIX (v4.0d) box (being
a VMSbot it was much easier than I thought). We want to use it to interface
with an existing web client. The Forte part is to provide us a scalable
access path to Oracle DBs on the VMS machine; already running Forte.
I'm having trouble finding media that contains C++ v5.4.-006 for the Unix
box. Does anyone know of/has used higher versions of C++ without too much
drama? How about v5.7 or even v6.1? We will be using extensive C++
interfacing to existing web pages!
NB: The current web system client is compiled using EGCS 2.91.66.
TIA,
/[:-)irK
Dirk Haben, Perth WA
For the archives, go to: http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: [email protected]

Dirk:
I ran into a similar problem. I added an other flag to my fcompile script and
it seems to be working fine, your mileage may vary. The flag was
-cflags "-oldcxx only"
Dwayne Kryger
"Haben, Dirk" <[email protected]> on 08/25/99 02:09:16 AM
To: "'Soapbox Forte Users'" <[email protected]>
cc: (bcc: Dwayne Kryger/SEH)
Subject: (forte-users) C++ version compatibility question. Forte v30L2 on
Digital Unix 4 d and C++ version ???
G'day Folxs
Just installed Forte as a Simple Server on a Digital UNIX (v4.0d) box (being
a VMSbot it was much easier than I thought). We want to use it to interface
with an existing web client. The Forte part is to provide us a scalable
access path to Oracle DBs on the VMS machine; already running Forte.
I'm having trouble finding media that contains C++ v5.4.-006 for the Unix
box. Does anyone know of/has used higher versions of C++ without too much
drama? How about v5.7 or even v6.1? We will be using extensive C++
interfacing to existing web pages!
NB: The current web system client is compiled using EGCS 2.91.66.
TIA,
/[:-)irK
Dirk Haben, Perth WA
For the archives, go to: http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: [email protected]

WAP54G Version compatibility

I am trying to create a wireless bridge between a network with ip's 198.1.1.xxx (this network has the gateway) to a network with ip's 198.1.2.xxx - so that it can access the internet thru the gateway). Both AP's are WAP54G set to bridge mode. Both are configured identically except for the IP numbers. SSID broadcast disabled and security off. From everything I have read, I should be able to ping (example 4.2.2.2) from 198.1.2.xxx - but cannot. The only difference I can see it that one of the WAP54G's is version 2 and the other is Version 3. Both have firmware 3.0.4.
Question: Can anyone confirm that I can or cannot create a wireless bridge with differing versions of the same device?
As a plan B, I have on order a WET200. Should I have two on order to act as a matched pair as the WAP54G's had to be?
Thank you.
Craig

I work with psd, indd and illu/eps files. I've heard the weird argument that "cause of new features it's not possible to be version compatible, but that's down right silly. Text on top of an image should be readable in any version. Even with a copule of adjustment layers it should be no problems with version compatibility. That Adobe choose to lock and force is another story. I guess I will be sticking to my CS6 version in the years to come. I paid a lot of money for that Master Collection. I also corresponde files with many CS4 users on the client side.

RoboHelp Version Compatibility

Hello everybody from Greece,
I want to ask about version compatibility. I've got RoboHelp
HTML 5.0.2 and my client has RoboHelp HTML 3.1. He asks if I can
compile his project, but I wnt to know if he will be able to work
with the project that I will work with in version 5.0.2.
Is there a way to save the project to an older version?
Is there a compatibility problem in general?
Is there going to be a problem if I compile the project in
the newer version? (Will he see any differences?)
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Tansou and υποδοχή,
You should be able to open up the X3.1 in X5.02 without a
problem. X5 will preserve all the feature used in X3.1. Are you
compiling HTML Help? My guess is that you won't see any difference
in the output when you compile.
However, the problem comes when you try and do this the other
way around. Robohelp is not backward compatible. So you won't be
able to pass a modified project back to your client. Rick the
robowizard has a few tricks to help with backward compatibility if
you don't mind going under the hood. However, not sure if this
works with X3.1 jumping to X3.1.
What type of output are you generating?
Hope that helps
Craig

Adobe Reader version compatability

I have a PDF that is compatible with Adobe reader 11.0.2 and I have version 11.0.5 currently installed. Version 11.0.5 won't open the PDF. How can I open this PDF? Do I need to specifically download version 11.0.2?
Thanks for any help!

I can open Reader on its own. I am trying to download a grant application and when I click on the link that is supposed to open it through Reader it says that Reader is not compatible and that I need to install the latest version of the PDF viewer. When I click on the link to install the latest version it send me to the Reader installation. I have installed and tried reinstalling Reader and it hasn't helped. In the instructions for the grant it only talks about compatability for versions up to 11.0.2 that's why I wasn't sure if maybe the problem is because I have 11.0.5.

NWDI Versions

I have read this document: NWDI vs. NWDI content
however, I'm having some doubts about it.
I'm currently on a project at a client trying to bring UCES online with some custom development.
I have 2 issues, this is one of them.
The Java AS is a separate box running Netweaver 7.00.
The NWDI system is on Netweaver 7.4.
I have created a track with 7.00 template and wrote a very simple "Hello World" application with a JSP page and a Java class in the WAR DC.
Everything compiled fine but I got a runtime error on the Java AS box:
class file has wrong version 50.0, should be 48.0
Please remove or make sure it appears in the correct subdirectory of the classpath.
So I'm wondering:
if the CBS of NWDI is on 7.4 and uses SAP JVM 6 to compile the SC, when it goes to the Java AS, which is on 7.00 running JVM 4, isn't there going to be a conflict?
and is there a way to tell CBS to use JVM 4 to compile my 7.00 track?
Thanks!
Eddy

Stefan,
Thanks for the info!
I have completed the following:
1. installed JDK1.4.2 on the NWDI
2. added key/value pair for JDK1.4.2_HOME in JDK_HOME_PATHS in CBS (left BUILD_TOOL_JDK_HOME blank)
3. added com.sap.jdk.home_path_key=JDK1.4.2_HOME to the default variant
Now I'm getting errors in NWDS when trying to compile:
Error: com.sap.tc.buildplugin.util.BuildPluginException: No JDK_HOME_PATH defined for key 'JDK1.4.2_HOME'
Is there something on the NWDS side I need to set?
Thanks!
Eddy

Adobe AIR version compatibility

Hi,
I am trying to run my application built in Flex Builder 3 and
compatibility with Adobe AIR beta 3 on Adobe AIR 1.0 (i.e. latest
version 1.0.7.4880); but its not working. It gives "This
application requires a version of Adobe AIR which is no longer
supported. Please contact the application author for an updated
version."
So is there any solution for this, that i can run my Adobe
AIR beta 3 compatible application on Adobe AIR 1.0 (i.e.
1.0.7.4880)?
Thanks,
vijayataV

No, AIR applications that target Beta 3 can only be run on
Beta 3. To target the 1.0 release, you must migrate your
application. In most cases, this only requires changing the
namespace in the application descriptor to refer to 1.0.
Oliver Goldman | Adobe AIR Engineering

Discoverer version compatable with 8.1.7

We are currently upgrading from 7.3 to 8.1.7, and I am wondering if the current version of Discoverer will still be compatable. What I am looking for is for someone to tell me what versions of Discoverer are compatable with 8.1.7 of the database or point me to a page on the Oracle web site.
Cheers

Pl open an SR with Support for this issue
Srini

Lightroom, Bridge, Photoshop version compatibility

I am now using Lightroom 1.1 and also have Photoshop CS2 (version 9.0.2), Bridge CS2 and of course Camera Raw (version ?)installed on my Windows XP computer. My question is, do I have to upgrade to Photoshop CS3 and Camera Raw 4 for compatibility with Lightroom? Also, how do I know which version of Camera Raw is installed?
PB

Lightroom has its own version of Camera RAW. The only reason you'd need to upgrade to CS3 is to get the latest version of Camera RAW, and the only reason you'd need to do that is if you want to be able to open the images you edit in Lightroom in Camera RAW and still have all the edits in place. You can open the image itself (processed through Lightroom) in Photoshop will all the edits in place regardless of what version you are using (I use Elements 3.0).

NWDS version compatibility !!

Dear Friends,
I would like to pose a simple question on the compatiblity of the NWDS version with my Portal version
My client set up has Portal version of NW 7.0.1 SP3 .The information i get from the SLD has the following info
Software Components all components...
Name Version Applied
sap.com/SAP-JEECOR 7.01 SP3 (1000.7.01.3.0.20081208163400) 20090713142753
sap.com/SAP-JEE 7.01 SP3 (1000.7.01.3.0.20081208163400) 20090713142549
Now the client says it has an NWDS version with 7.01.03
Now we need to set up a system at offshore as well.I couldnt find an NWDS version of the afore said 7.01.03 so i got NWDS 7.1 EHP1 SP4 Preview version from SDN .I would like to ask you if this version is compatible with the NW 7.0.1 SP3. You can also suggest me a more compatible version of NWDS or a place in SDN where i can look up for the compatibility between NWDS and the NW .
Kindly do the needful.

Hi Nishita,
I agree with Gilles... You can not use NWDS 7.1 for your portal 7.0.1. it wont support.
Always see to it that ur portal version matches with NWDS (even lower version of NWDS works).
For confirmation check below threads...
/thread/1551768 [original link is broken]
NWDS Compatability issue
Thanks,
pradeeP

Version compatibility issues

After installing 2.0, will Encore projects from previous versions open seamlessly into 2.0? I'm in the middle of a large project--is it safe to change horses mid-stream?
Julie

You guys really never had any problems with 1.0 or 1.5? 2 out of 3 friends of mine (professional DVD authors, as myself), had to abandon Encore because of bugs. And yes, as a programmer, I certainly do know when a program has bugs, as opposed to my own errors. I'm not saying I have never had problems that weren't my own fault, obviously I have.
Encore 1.51, on an ongoing basis would randomly corrupt files, menus, subtitles etc., which caused me to do over days of work more than once. Almost everyone I know has had these corruption problems, and I have seen it mentioned in these forums many times. These problems happened on at least 6 different PCs, with Encore being reinstalled on some of the machines a couple of times. Drivers/compability issues don't apply to most of the problems (for instance simply closing a working project and then reopening it the next day, and it becoming corrupt, wouldn't be a compatibility issue). I use many high-end animation programs, graphic design tools and interactive media creation tools without problems like I have witnesssed with Encore.
As for subtitling issues - I thought that was clear how I knew that the fault was within Encore and not the user. I'm not talking about simple overlap issues and incorrect coding issues, which I have had, I'm talking about Encore deleting all subtitles throughout the project, once you completed adding them.
Question for those that disagree with me, who say that Encore 1.51 works great - have any of you done really in-depth interactive projects? (I am asking seriously, not sarcastically) For instance, I did not have problems on simple DVDs with 2 or 3 menus and 10 or 11 linked videos. When Encore seemed to start corrupting my files was when I was working on educational DVDs with 30-40 menus, 50+ linked videos, with each video having subtitles in english and spanish, as well as audio in English and Spanish. {Encore advertises that all this should not be a problem]. So I'm asking seriously - has anyone worked on really complicated projects, with many subtitle and audio tracks, that took weeks or months to complete - without any corruption problems? I'd actually like to know - I'm not putting it out there to be rude.
If Adobe can admit that since 1.0 and 1.5 were early versions of the product, and, not surprisingly, had some issues which have now been fixed, then I'll gladly upgrade. If Adobe's official position is that Encore NEVER had any bugs, and the only possible errors were on the user end, then I am not interested in upgrading.

NWDI version compatibility

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for