NxCreateSession Long Execution
I have created an executable that uses NI-XNET and a NI PCI-8512 CAN card. I create a distribution and installed it on a PC. After installation, I startup the appplication and everything works as expected.
However, when starting the application immediately following a boot of the PC, the application seems to hang a few times. After this, the application does not perform as expected. I have narrowed down the hanging to the NI-XNET function "nxCreateSession". Using printfs and the Timer() function, it seems that it takes this function call 2 to 3 seconds on average.
The interesting thing is that if i close the application and start it again, everything works as expected and the "nxCreateSession" function takes about 0.5 seconds on average. Also, If i start the NI-XNET Database Editor prior to starting my application immediately following a boot of the PC, everything works as expected.
I hope this makes sense and that someone has seen a similar issue. Thanks in advance for any advice.
Mark.
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Hey mjz,
I have never seen this identical issue, however, I have seen some similar issues with the XNET API where errors can occur when the database isn't fully deployed before trying to call to it. Since you said that this behavior only happens when you run the program right after the computer boots, it leads me to believe that you might just need to give the database some time to deploy. Try putting a couple second wait somewhere in your VI before you get to the nxCreateSession function that seems to be hanging and see if that helps at all.
Regards,
Doug B
Applications Engineer
National Instruments
Similar Messages
-
Long execution times for TestStand conditional statements
I have two test stations – one here, one at the factory in China that has been operating for about a year. The test program uses TestStand 3.1 and calls primarily dll's developed using CVI. Up until a couple months ago, both test stations performed in a similar manner, then the computer at the factory died and was replaced with a new, faster computer. Now the same test sequence at the factory take three times as long to execute (30 min at the facotry, 10min here).
I have recoded the execution time at various point during the execution, and have found that the extra times seems to be occurring during the evaluation of conditional statements in TestStand (i.e. for loops, if statements, case statements). For example, one particular ‘for’ evaluation takes 30 ms on the test station here, but takes 400 ms at the test station at the factory (note: this is just the evaluation of the for condition, not the execution of the steps contained within the for loop).
The actual dll calls seem to be slightly faster with the new computer.
Also the ‘Module Times’ reported don’t seem to match the actual time for the module for the computer at the factory. For example, for the following piece of TestStand code:
Label1
Subsequence Call
Label2
I record the execution time to the report text in both Label1 and Label2. Subtracting one from the other gives me about 18 seconds. However the ‘Module Time’ recorded for ‘Subsequence Call’ is only 3.43 seconds.
Any body have any ideas why the long execution time with the new computer? I always setup the computers in exactly the same way, but maybe there is a TestStand setting somewhere that I have missed? Keep in mind, both test stations are running exactly the same revision of code.Got some more results from the factory this morning:
1) Task Manager shows that the TestExec.exe is the only thing using CPU to any significant degree. Also CPU Usage History show that the CPU Usage never reaches 100%.
2) I sent a new test program that will log test execution time in more places. Longer execution times are seen in nearly every area of the program, but one area where this is very dramatic is the time taken to return from one particular subsequence call. In this subsequence I log the time just before the <End Group> at then end of Main. There is nothing in Cleanup. I then log the time immediately after returning from this sequence. On the test system I have here this takes approximately 160 ms. On the test system at the factory this takes approximately 14.5 seconds! The program seems to be hanging here for some reason. Every time this function is called the same thing happens and for the same amount of time (and this function is called about 40 times in the test program, so this is kill me). -
Alert with event for delayed job and long execution time
Dear All,
We are planning to send alert via email in case job delayed or long execution time.
I have followed below steps:
1) Create event Raise Event when job is delayed.
2) create job chain with STEP1, Job 1 and assign event in raise event parameter.
3) Once job chain delayed it should raise events.
4) Above event should trigger custom email but I can not put the Mail_To parameter as IN parameter. And can not be recognized during
execution.
It ends with the below error.
Details:
JCS-122035: Unable to persist: JCS-102075: Mandatory parameter not set: Parameter Mail_To for job 20413
at com.redwood.scheduler.model.SchedulerSessionImpl.writeDirtyListLocal(SchedulerSessionImpl.java:805)
at com.redwood.scheduler.model.SchedulerSessionImpl.persist(SchedulerSessionImpl.java:757)
Please let us know if anybody knows how to add Mail_To parameter to script.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
JiggiDear Jiggi,
where will you define execution time of particular job? because some jobs will take only 1 or 2 minutes, but some jobs normally take more than hours, so how will you decide execution time of individual jobs?
i thinks you can use P_TO Parameter for sending mail, if you want to add some output log activate spool output script.
Thanks and regards
Muhammad Asif -
Optimize long execution time due to 'db file sequential read'
Hi to all,
I have got a query that takes long execution time. Most of the time is due to 'db file sequential read'. The query is:
SELECT * FROM Table_Name
WHERE col1 = :some_value
AND col2 BETWEEN :some_range_about_2_Million
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 21 | 504 | 26125 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| Table_Name | 21 | 504 | 26125 |
| 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | Index Name | 1705K| | 4100 |
The table is not partitioned having around 0.2 billion records. Record set for column 'col1' is around 1700K.
Another index is available for the col2 and col3 is not getting used.
Any suggestions to optimize it..
Regards.Perhaps a combined index (col2, col1) would work...or try "parallel" hint.
:p -
Hi,
lately, I realized that Jubula needs extremely long for all the progresses...
For example, deleting TestResults or after execution of TestCases, the Progress "Collecting Information" and "Writing Report to Database" needs about 15-20 minutes!!
I use the embedded database and html toolkit and my project is not big at all!
I already had larger projects and never experienced that long progresses!
Any ideas/suggestions why Jubula is suddenly working that slow?
ThanksHi Nicole,
Thanks for your question! I think the problem is that the h2 database isn't designed for productive use - it doesn't scale well and will indeed get slower and slower with time (not necessarily size of the project, just time).
If you need to keep using it then you can do the following:
- stop Jubula
- perform an export all to export all of the projects
- you can also copy the database files (from your home directory under .jubula) to back them up
- delete the database files from your home directory
- connect to the database: this will recreate the database
- then you can import the projects you exported
Like I say, this isn't the preferred way of working, but the steps above should help with the current performance. Bear in mind that you should ensure that you have backups before you delete the database!
Hope that helps,
Alex -
Hi,
Can anyone see a problem with the below query it is taking a long time to execute in SQL developer
select ol.sku_id, oh.order_id
from order_header oh, order_line ol
where ol.qty_tasked <= 0 or ol.qty_picked <= 0
and oh.order_id = ol.order_id
and oh.order_id = '9150391359'
and oh.client_id = ol.client_id
group by oh.order_id, ol.sku_id
order by ol.sku_id#
Regards,
Sam.You can try something like this:
select
ol.sku_id, oh.order_id
from
(select order_id, client_id
from order_header
where order_id = '9150391359') oh,
(select order_id, client_id, skew_id
from order_line
where qty_tasked <= 0 OR qty_picked <= 0) ol
where
oh.order_id = ol.order_id AND
oh.client_id = ol.client_id
group by
oh.order_id, ol.sku_id
order by
ol.sku_idThis will reduce the number of rows before the join and may speed things up. -
hi,
working with 10g XE
new_header table has 9749 rows and consist of two column : itemsets and codes like that
AST:GLU:KREA:Na:IBIL, 2380. codes starts from 1 to 9749
when I run belows pl/sql codes, it takes very long time in fact it can not be complete without error
declare
cnt1 number(15) ;
cnt2 number(15) ;
itemset1 varchar(800) ;
itemset2 varchar2(800) ;
begin
select max(codes) into cnt1 from new_header ;
cnt2 := cnt1 ;
for f in 1..cnt1 loop --cnt1 loop
for l in 1..cnt2 loop --cnt2 loop
itemset1 := 'AST:GLU:KREA:Na:TBIL:IBIL' ; ---given for exeample
--select itemsets into itemset1 from new_header where codes = f ;
insert into k1
select REGEXP_SUBSTR (itemset1,'[^:]+', 1, level)
from dual
connect by level <= length(regexp_replace(itemset1 ,'[^:]*'))+1 ;
select itemsets into itemset2 from new_header where codes = l ;
insert into k2
select REGEXP_SUBSTR (itemset2,'[^:]+', 1, level)
from dual
connect by level <= length(regexp_replace(itemset2 ,'[^:]*'))+1 ;*/
check_it ;
commit ;
end loop ;
end loop ;
dbms_output.put_line(myres.count) ;
end ;
I wanto to get each part of itemset1 seperated by : k1 global temporary table has one column varchar2 will be used in check_it procudere to compare with a table values. please give me some advice urgent..what can i do. what can I use instead of regexp_substr or any idea..thanks..The regexp_substr isn't the problem.
The problem is your table has 9749 rows and you're doing this:
for f in 1..cnt1 loop --cnt1 loop
for l in 1..cnt2 loop --cnt2 loop
end loop ;
end loop ;i.e. you are trying to execute the code in the loops 9749^2 which is roughly 95 million times. And you wonder why its taking a long time.
I havn't even tried to work out what you are trying to achieve in the rest of the code - maybe you could elaborate.
I suggest you rethink your approach to the problem though. Oh, and no, it's not urgent. -
BAPI performance low- taking too long execution time
Hi,
I am using BAPI "BAPI_MOSRVAPS_GETLIST2" for reading planned order details but its taking to long to execute (3-4 mins approx for 3-4 products). Please suggest me how to improve the performance of it. Input for the BAPI :
Import Parameters
Tables (Input)
PRODUCT_SELECTION
LOCATION_SELECTION
*Tables(Output)*
ORDER_HEADS
PEGGING_OUTPUT_NODES
Thanks ,
RoopeshHi,
If possible give values for locations , location types .
Please also check if you can give order ATP category.
This should give faster extraction of data.
Regards
Datta -
Long execution of 'no. of entries'
Hi,
I had z-table with huge no. of entries. I somehow managed to delete all entries. however in se16 if i click on 'no. of entries' tab , the system takes a lot of time & then displays '0 records' . Can anyone help me ?
ByeHi,
are you sure your table is really empty? (think of other clients)
Or is just the data of this client you are loged in not existing anymore?
If it is really empty and you can be sure that you don't need any data
of any client:
Go To SE14 - enter table name - edit
mark "delete data" and click "Activate and adjust database"
The table is "truncated" then... all of the allocated table and indexblocks
are freed back to the database system (for other tables).
If you delete in your ABAP programm only a logical delete is done.
All blocks stay allocated for this table and its indexes and can only
be reused by this table.
If your count does a table or index full scan... it runs much longer if
the number of allocated (but empty) blocks is high. In this case
you can speed it up by removing the allocated (empty) blocks from
the table and indexes with SE14 as pointed out above.
Kind regards,
Hermann -
Long execution for Full optimize?
Hi!
Do anyone know how long a normal executiontion time for full optimize is? And what you can do to speed it up?
We have an application with about 5 000 000 records in the Fact table. We have scheduled 8 imports every day which creates about 100 000 records for every import in the Fac2 table. And we have sheduled one full optimize every night and this optimize takes about 45 minutes, is this normal for this number of records in the tables.That's about how long our optimizes take with our 9m record fact table.
The fewer the records, the shorter the optimize so you can look into partitioning and archiving if you would like to shorten the optimize time. -
LabVIEW2012 has long execution time to write string than LabVIEW2011 on XP SP3
in for loop, each execution will output string and display it on front panel by value property.
But after upgrade to LabVIEW 2012, the execution time doubled on Chinese XP OS, I really want to know this difference between LabVIEW 2011 & LabVIEW 2012, pls advice.
"I think therefore I am"This is no way to measure the execution time. Your parallel while loop spins as fast as the computer allows, consuming all CPU it can get in the process, and starving everything else. Your code is highly flawed!
Eli: actually I add 10milliseconds delay inside both for and while loop.
In addition, get date/time in seconds is also a relatively expensive function, not to mention all these local variables! Your benchmark is completely meaningless! All it does is slow down your regular code, nothing else. How do you know in what order things start? Where is the "start time" initilized (where is the terminal?!)
Eli: I am using the states machine, and set the "start time" during the program initialization, then calculate "test time"in next case (running block).
A proper benchmark uses a three-frame flat sequence with to high resolution relative seconds timers, on in each outer frame and the code to be benchmarked in the inner frame. (here is an example). The difference between the two timers is the exection time of the inner code in seconds. Make sure to only have wires in the benchmarking code. All controls and indicators belong outside the sequence. Also make sure that no other code can run in parallel to the sequence.
Use this and you'll be surprise how fast your code actually runs.
Then you should also disabele debugging.
Please attach your actual code (including the subVI) so we can see what else you are doing wrong.
Eli: if possible, give me your mail address, then I can sent more actual code to you separately.
"I think therefore I am" -
I have implemented a basic login screen and its working ok except that it's giving me this error and is taking long to execute:
Error: Error #1502: A script has executed for longer than the default timeout period of 15 seconds.
at login_screen/Checklogininfo()[login_screen::frame1:34]
Script is the following:
login_error_lbl.visible = false;
login_ok_btn.addEventListener (MouseEvent.CLICK,Checklogininfo);
function Checklogininfo (event:MouseEvent):void
while ((User_name_txtbox.text != "xx") || (Password_txtbox.text != "y")){
login_error_lbl.visible = true; /////////////////////////////////////////this part of the "while" is taking very long to execute
User_name_txtbox.text = "";
Password_txtbox.text = "";
this.visible = false;
Any ideas how I can go about it? Thanks!Perhaps something like this. The credentials are checked each time login_ok_btn is clicked.
login_error_lbl.visible = false;
login_ok_btn.addEventListener (MouseEvent.CLICK,Checklogininfo);
function Checklogininfo (event:MouseEvent):void
var loginValid:Boolean = ((User_name_txtbox.text == "xx") && (Password_txtbox.text == "y"));
// don't know if you really want to clear these fields
// might want to just leave them alone so the user can see what was typed
User_name_txtbox.text = "";
Password_txtbox.text = "";
this.visible = login_error_lbl.visible = !loginValid; -
Long execution time for report MMREO050N
Hi,
I want ask a help for a report MMREO050N.
I have executed a report MMREO050N in ECC6.0, for archive 42.000 materials, but the program run a long long time, in 24 hours the report have elaborated only 254 materiel and with this performance, the program will run for months...
do you have any suggestions?
Thanks
Regards
Andrea Cioccais it the first archiving program you execute?
I am just asking this as I have seen many questions here and all started with archiving of material master while material master archiving is probably the very last step in an archving circle.
Just execute SARA, enter MM_MATNR and click the button for network.
SAP will shows you which objects should be archived prior to material master.
wrong sequence of archiving has an enormous effect on run time, because SAP executes some hundred checks for each material master. And if you have a still dependend data for an material to be archived, then SAP reads a lot data before and writes error messages in the log and does not archive the material.
Even after having archived the dependend data I am still facing about 3 minutes runtime per material. -
SQL Query + long execution time.
Dear Gurus/masters/All,
I request you all to help me in tuning the SQL query which is taking more time. DB Version : 10.2.0.4
SQL Query WHERE condition:
select column1, column2, .........
FROM
SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T1,
SIEBEL.S_PROD_INT T2,
SIEBEL.S_VOD T3,
SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T4,
SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T5,
SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT_X T6,
SIEBEL.S_PROD_LN T7,
SIEBEL.S_ASSET_OM T8,
SIEBEL.S_VOD_VER T9,
SIEBEL.S_CTLG_CAT T10,
SIEBEL.S_CONTACT T11,
SIEBEL.S_PARTY T12,
SIEBEL.S_PARTY T13,
SIEBEL.S_PROD_INT T14,
SIEBEL.S_ASSET_BU T15,
SIEBEL.S_CTLG_CAT T16,
SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T17,
SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T18,
SIEBEL.S_ASSET T19,
SIEBEL.S_ADDR_PER T20,
SIEBEL.S_ORG_EXT T21,
SIEBEL.S_ASSET_X T22,
SIEBEL.S_ASSET T23
WHERE
T16.PAR_CAT_ID = T10.ROW_ID (+) AND
T14.CG_PR_CTLG_CAT_ID = T16.ROW_ID (+) AND
T3.ROW_ID = T9.VOD_ID AND
T14.CFG_MODEL_ID = T3.OBJECT_NUM AND
T23.OWNER_CON_ID = T11.ROW_ID (+) AND
T23.OWNER_ACCNT_ID = T6.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
T23.PER_ADDR_ID = T20.ROW_ID (+) AND
T23.PROD_ID = T14.ROW_ID AND
T23.OWNER_ACCNT_ID = T21.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
T14.PR_PROD_LN_ID = T7.ROW_ID (+) AND
T23.ROOT_ASSET_ID = T19.ROW_ID (+) AND
T19.PROD_ID = T2.ROW_ID (+) AND
T23.BILL_ACCNT_ID = T18.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
T23.RTNG_DLR_ID = T1.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
T23.PREF_SRV_DLR_ID = T17.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
T23.DLR_ID = T4.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
T23.ROW_ID = T22.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
T23.ROW_ID = T8.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
T23.PR_CON_ID = T12.ROW_ID (+) AND
T23.BU_ID = T15.BU_ID (+) AND T23.ROW_ID = T15.ASSET_ID (+) AND
T15.BU_ID = T13.ROW_ID (+) AND
T15.BU_ID = T5.PAR_ROW_ID (+) AND
((T23.SERIAL_NUM IS NOT NULL AND T23.PAR_ASSET_ID IS NULL OR T23.X_PHONE_NUMBER IS NOT NULL AND T23.PAR_ASSET_ID IS NOT NULL) AND
(T9.VER_NUM = :1));Query Exection Plan:
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 967177145
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 54117 | 92M| 4435K (1)| 01:58:43 |
| 1 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 54117 | 92M| 4435K (1)| 01:58:43 |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 54117 | 87M| 4261K (1)| 01:54:04 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 54117 | 86M| 4154K (1)| 01:51:13 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 54117 | 85M| 4111K (1)| 01:50:03 |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 54117 | 84M| 3980K (1)| 01:46:33 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 54117 | 83M| 3937K (1)| 01:45:24 |
| 7 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 54117 | 81M| 3763K (1)| 01:40:44 |
| 8 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 54117 | 81M| 3751K (1)| 01:40:25 |
| 9 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 54117 | 80M| 3621K (1)| 01:36:57 |
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 54117 | 73M| 3515K (1)| 01:34:07 |
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 54117 | 71M| 3410K (1)| 01:31:18 |
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 54117 | 69M| 3410K (1)| 01:31:18 |
| 13 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 54117 | 67M| 3410K (1)| 01:31:18 |
| 14 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 54117 | 66M| 3410K (1)| 01:31:18 |
| 15 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 54117 | 64M| 3324K (1)| 01:28:59 |
| 16 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 54117 | 62M| 3237K (1)| 01:26:40 |
| 17 | NESTED LOOPS | | 54117 | 57M| 3106K (1)| 01:23:10 |
| 18 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 71 | 43665 | 381 (2)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 71 | 42316 | 323 (2)| 00:00:01 |
| 20 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 71 | 41322 | 322 (2)| 00:00:01 |
| 21 | NESTED LOOPS | | 71 | 24708 | 265 (3)| 00:00:01 |
| 22 | NESTED LOOPS | | 77 | 2772 | 141 (4)| 00:00:01 |
|* 23 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | S_VOD_VER | 75 | 1350 | 72 (7)| 00:00:01 |
| 24 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| S_VOD | 1 | 18 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 25 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_VOD_P1 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 26 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_PROD_INT | 1 | 312 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 27 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_PROD_INT_F9 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 28 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_PROD_LN | 1 | 234 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 29 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_PROD_LN_P1 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 30 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_CTLG_CAT | 1 | 14 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 31 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_CTLG_CAT_P1 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 32 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_CTLG_CAT | 1 | 19 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 33 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_CTLG_CAT_P1 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 34 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ASSET | 760 | 375K| 43753 (1)| 00:01:11 |
|* 35 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_ASSET_U2 | 55873 | | 312 (3)| 00:00:01 |
| 36 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ASSET_OM | 1 | 94 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 37 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_ASSET_OM_U1 | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 38 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_CONTACT | 1 | 39 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 39 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_CONTACT_P1 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 40 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ADDR_PER | 1 | 29 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 41 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ADDR_PER_P1 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 42 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 1 | 32 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 43 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 44 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 1 | 32 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 45 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 46 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 1 | 32 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 47 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 48 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 1 | 36 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 49 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 50 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 1 | 139 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 51 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 52 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT_X | 1 | 16 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 53 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_X_U1 | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 54 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_PARTY_P1 | 1 | 12 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 55 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ASSET_BU | 1 | 34 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 56 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_ASSET_BU_U1 | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 57 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_PARTY_P1 | 1 | 12 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 58 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ASSET | 1 | 37 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 59 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ASSET_P1 | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 60 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_PROD_INT | 1 | 16 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 61 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_PROD_INT_P1 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 62 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 1 | 14 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 63 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 64 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ASSET_X | 1 | 93 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 65 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_ASSET_X_U1 | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
23 - filter("T9"."VER_NUM"=TO_NUMBER(:1))
25 - access("T3"."ROW_ID"="T9"."VOD_ID")
27 - access("T14"."CFG_MODEL_ID"="T3"."OBJECT_NUM")
29 - access("T14"."PR_PROD_LN_ID"="T7"."ROW_ID"(+))
31 - access("T14"."CG_PR_CTLG_CAT_ID"="T16"."ROW_ID"(+))
33 - access("T16"."PAR_CAT_ID"="T10"."ROW_ID"(+))
34 - filter("T23"."PAR_ASSET_ID" IS NULL AND "T23"."SERIAL_NUM" IS NOT NULL OR "T23"."X_PHONE_NUMBER" IS
NOT NULL AND "T23"."PAR_ASSET_ID" IS NOT NULL)
35 - access("T23"."PROD_ID"="T14"."ROW_ID")
37 - access("T23"."ROW_ID"="T8"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
39 - access("T23"."OWNER_CON_ID"="T11"."ROW_ID"(+))
41 - access("T23"."PER_ADDR_ID"="T20"."ROW_ID"(+))
43 - access("T23"."RTNG_DLR_ID"="T1"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
45 - access("T23"."DLR_ID"="T4"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
47 - access("T23"."PREF_SRV_DLR_ID"="T17"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
49 - access("T23"."BILL_ACCNT_ID"="T18"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
51 - access("T23"."OWNER_ACCNT_ID"="T21"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
53 - access("T23"."OWNER_ACCNT_ID"="T6"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
54 - access("T23"."PR_CON_ID"="T12"."ROW_ID"(+))
56 - access("T23"."ROW_ID"="T15"."ASSET_ID"(+) AND "T23"."BU_ID"="T15"."BU_ID"(+))
57 - access("T15"."BU_ID"="T13"."ROW_ID"(+))
59 - access("T23"."ROOT_ASSET_ID"="T19"."ROW_ID"(+))
61 - access("T19"."PROD_ID"="T2"."ROW_ID"(+))
63 - access("T15"."BU_ID"="T5"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
65 - access("T23"."ROW_ID"="T22"."PAR_ROW_ID"(+))
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
105 rows selected.out put of dbms_xplan.display_cursor :
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display_cursor('xxxxxxxxxxxxxx',NULL,'iostats last'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, child number 0
SELECT T23.CONFLICT_ID, T23.LAST_UPD, T23.CREATED, T23.LAST_UPD_BY, T23.CREATED_BY,
T23.MODIFICATION_NUM, T23.ROW_ID, T23.ASSET_NUM, T21.LOC, T21.NAME, T23.INSTALL_DT,
T23.INVLOC_ID, T23.NAME, T23.OU_ADDR_ID, T23.OWNER_ACCNT_ID, T23.PAR_ASSET_ID, T23.PER_ADDR_ID,
T20.STATE, T23.PR_CON_ID, T23.PR_EMP_ID, T14.DESC_TEXT, T23.PROD_ID, T14.NAME,
T21.INTEGRATION_ID, T23.COST_LST_ID, T14.SERIALIZED_FLG, T23.REGISTERED_DT, T23.SERIAL_NUM,
T23.VERSION, T23.STATUS_CD, T14.PR_PROD_LN_ID, T7.NAME, T23.QTY, T23.ASSET_COND_CD,
T23.PR_ACCNT_ID, T23.OWNERSHIP_TYPE_CD, T23.XA_CLASS_ID, T23.OPER_STATUS_CD, T23.SP_NUM,
T23.BILL_ACCNT_ID, T23.SERV_ACCT_ID, T9.RELEASED_FLG, T23.CFG_TYPE_CD, T9.VER_NUM, T23.END_DT,
T23.ASSEMBLY_PORT_ID,
Plan hash value: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers | Reads |
| 1 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 10 | 10 |00:23:58.99 | 1236K| 460K|
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 10 | 10 |00:23:58.99 | 1236K| 460K|
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 10 | 10 |00:23:58.85 | 1236K| 460K|
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 10 | 10 |00:23:58.69 | 1236K| 460K|
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 10 | 10 |00:23:58.69 | 1236K| 460K|
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 10 | 10 |00:23:58.69 | 1236K| 460K|
| 7 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:23:58.47 | 1236K| 460K|
| 8 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:23:58.47 | 1236K| 460K|
| 9 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:23:58.37 | 1236K| 460K|
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:23:58.22 | 1236K| 460K|
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:23:58.16 | 1236K| 460K|
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:23:58.16 | 1236K| 460K|
| 13 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:23:58.16 | 1236K| 460K|
| 14 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:23:58.16 | 1236K| 460K|
| 15 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:23:58.09 | 1236K| 460K|
| 16 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:23:57.99 | 1236K| 460K|
| 17 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:23:57.98 | 1236K| 460K|
| 18 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 1 | 57 |00:00:00.02 | 828 | 0 |
| 19 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 2 | 57 |00:00:00.02 | 828 | 0 |
| 20 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 2 | 57 |00:00:00.02 | 828 | 0 |
| 21 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2 | 57 |00:00:00.01 | 786 | 0 |
| 22 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2 | 232 |00:00:00.01 | 493 | 0 |
|* 23 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | S_VOD_VER | 1 | 75 | 246 |00:00:00.01 | 12 | 0 |
| 24 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| S_VOD | 246 | 1 | 232 |00:00:00.01 | 481 | 0 |
|* 25 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_VOD_P1 | 246 | 1 | 232 |00:00:00.01 | 249 | 0 |
| 26 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_PROD_INT | 232 | 1 | 57 |00:00:00.01 | 293 | 0 |
|* 27 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_PROD_INT_F9 | 232 | 1 | 57 |00:00:00.01 | 236 | 0 |
| 28 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_PROD_LN | 57 | 1 | 39 |00:00:00.01 | 42 | 0 |
|* 29 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_PROD_LN_P1 | 57 | 1 | 39 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_CTLG_CAT | 57 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
|* 31 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_CTLG_CAT_P1 | 57 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_CTLG_CAT | 57 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
|* 33 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_CTLG_CAT_P1 | 57 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
|* 34 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ASSET | 57 | 10 | 10 |00:23:57.97 | 1235K| 460K|
|* 35 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_ASSET_U2 | 57 | 734 | 627K|00:00:01.34 | 4295 | 2032 |
| 36 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ASSET_OM | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 26 | 2 |
|* 37 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_ASSET_OM_U1 | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 26 | 2 |
| 38 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_CONTACT | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.11 | 36 | 12 |
|* 39 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_CONTACT_P1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.06 | 26 | 6 |
| 40 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ADDR_PER | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.07 | 36 | 18 |
|* 41 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ADDR_PER_P1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.04 | 26 | 8 |
| 42 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
|* 43 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
| 44 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
|* 45 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
| 46 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
|* 47 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
| 48 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.05 | 46 | 12 |
|* 49 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.03 | 26 | 6 |
| 50 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.15 | 55 | 23 |
|* 51 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.04 | 26 | 6 |
| 52 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT_X | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.10 | 40 | 12 |
|* 53 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_X_U1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.05 | 30 | 6 |
|* 54 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_PARTY_P1 | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 5 | 0 |
| 55 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ASSET_BU | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.22 | 50 | 29 |
|* 56 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_ASSET_BU_U1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.15 | 40 | 19 |
| 57 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.01 | 36 | 0 |
|* 58 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.01 | 26 | 0 |
|* 59 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_PARTY_P1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.01 | 26 | 0 |
| 60 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ASSET_X | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.16 | 50 | 20 |
|* 61 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_ASSET_X_U1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.09 | 40 | 10 |
| 62 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ASSET | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.14 | 46 | 19 |
|* 63 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ASSET_P1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.04 | 36 | 9 |
| 64 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_PROD_INT | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.01 | 26 | 0 |
|* 65 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_PROD_INT_P1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.01 | 16 | 0 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
23 - filter("T9"."VER_NUM"=:1)
25 - access("T3"."ROW_ID"="T9"."VOD_ID")
27 - access("T14"."CFG_MODEL_ID"="T3"."OBJECT_NUM")
29 - access("T14"."PR_PROD_LN_ID"="T7"."ROW_ID")
31 - access("T14"."CG_PR_CTLG_CAT_ID"="T16"."ROW_ID")
33 - access("T16"."PAR_CAT_ID"="T10"."ROW_ID")
34 - filter((("T23"."PAR_ASSET_ID" IS NULL AND "T23"."SERIAL_NUM" IS NOT NULL) OR ("T23"."X_PHONE_NUMBER" IS NOT NULL AND
"T23"."PAR_ASSET_ID" IS NOT NULL)))
35 - access("T23"."PROD_ID"="T14"."ROW_ID")
37 - access("T23"."ROW_ID"="T8"."PAR_ROW_ID")
39 - access("T23"."OWNER_CON_ID"="T11"."ROW_ID")
41 - access("T23"."PER_ADDR_ID"="T20"."ROW_ID")
43 - access("T23"."RTNG_DLR_ID"="T1"."PAR_ROW_ID")
45 - access("T23"."DLR_ID"="T4"."PAR_ROW_ID")
47 - access("T23"."PREF_SRV_DLR_ID"="T17"."PAR_ROW_ID")
49 - access("T23"."BILL_ACCNT_ID"="T18"."PAR_ROW_ID")
51 - access("T23"."OWNER_ACCNT_ID"="T21"."PAR_ROW_ID")
53 - access("T23"."OWNER_ACCNT_ID"="T6"."PAR_ROW_ID")
54 - access("T23"."PR_CON_ID"="T12"."ROW_ID")
56 - access("T23"."ROW_ID"="T15"."ASSET_ID" AND "T23"."BU_ID"="T15"."BU_ID")
58 - access("T15"."BU_ID"="T5"."PAR_ROW_ID")
59 - access("T15"."BU_ID"="T13"."ROW_ID")
61 - access("T23"."ROW_ID"="T22"."PAR_ROW_ID")
63 - access("T23"."ROOT_ASSET_ID"="T19"."ROW_ID")
65 - access("T19"."PROD_ID"="T2"."ROW_ID")
SQL_ID xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, child number 1
SELECT T23.CONFLICT_ID, T23.LAST_UPD, T23.CREATED, T23.LAST_UPD_BY, T23.CREATED_BY,
T23.MODIFICATION_NUM, T23.ROW_ID, T23.ASSET_NUM, T21.LOC, T21.NAME, T23.INSTALL_DT,
T23.INVLOC_ID, T23.NAME, T23.OU_ADDR_ID, T23.OWNER_ACCNT_ID, T23.PAR_ASSET_ID, T23.PER_ADDR_ID,
T20.STATE, T23.PR_CON_ID, T23.PR_EMP_ID, T14.DESC_TEXT, T23.PROD_ID, T14.NAME,
T21.INTEGRATION_ID, T23.COST_LST_ID, T14.SERIALIZED_FLG, T23.REGISTERED_DT, T23.SERIAL_NUM,
T23.VERSION, T23.STATUS_CD, T14.PR_PROD_LN_ID, T7.NAME, T23.QTY, T23.ASSET_COND_CD,
T23.PR_ACCNT_ID, T23.OWNERSHIP_TYPE_CD, T23.XA_CLASS_ID, T23.OPER_STATUS_CD, T23.SP_NUM,
T23.BILL_ACCNT_ID, T23.SERV_ACCT_ID, T9.RELEASED_FLG, T23.CFG_TYPE_CD, T9.VER_NUM, T23.END_DT,
T23.ASSEMBLY_PORT_ID,
Plan hash value: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Id | Operation | Name | Starts | E-Rows | A-Rows | A-Time | Buffers | Reads |
| 1 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 10 | 10 |00:28:15.04 | 1237K| 512K|
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 10 | 10 |00:28:15.04 | 1237K| 512K|
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 10 | 10 |00:28:14.92 | 1237K| 512K|
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 10 | 10 |00:28:14.82 | 1237K| 512K|
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 10 | 10 |00:28:14.82 | 1237K| 512K|
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 10 | 10 |00:28:14.82 | 1237K| 512K|
| 7 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:28:14.64 | 1237K| 512K|
| 8 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:28:14.63 | 1237K| 512K|
| 9 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:28:14.51 | 1237K| 512K|
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:28:14.42 | 1237K| 512K|
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:28:14.33 | 1236K| 512K|
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:28:14.33 | 1236K| 512K|
| 13 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:28:14.33 | 1236K| 512K|
| 14 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:28:14.33 | 1236K| 512K|
| 15 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:28:14.23 | 1236K| 512K|
| 16 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:28:14.12 | 1236K| 512K|
| 17 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 11 | 10 |00:28:14.12 | 1236K| 512K|
| 18 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 1 | 57 |00:00:00.02 | 828 | 0 |
| 19 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 1 | 57 |00:00:00.02 | 828 | 0 |
| 20 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 1 | 57 |00:00:00.01 | 828 | 0 |
| 21 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 1 | 57 |00:00:00.01 | 786 | 0 |
| 22 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2 | 232 |00:00:00.01 | 493 | 0 |
|* 23 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | S_VOD_VER | 1 | 74 | 246 |00:00:00.01 | 12 | 0 |
| 24 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| S_VOD | 246 | 1 | 232 |00:00:00.01 | 481 | 0 |
|* 25 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_VOD_P1 | 246 | 1 | 232 |00:00:00.01 | 249 | 0 |
| 26 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_PROD_INT | 232 | 1 | 57 |00:00:00.01 | 293 | 0 |
|* 27 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_PROD_INT_F9 | 232 | 1 | 57 |00:00:00.01 | 236 | 0 |
| 28 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_PROD_LN | 57 | 1 | 39 |00:00:00.01 | 42 | 0 |
|* 29 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_PROD_LN_P1 | 57 | 1 | 39 |00:00:00.01 | 3 | 0 |
| 30 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_CTLG_CAT | 57 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
|* 31 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_CTLG_CAT_P1 | 57 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_CTLG_CAT | 57 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
|* 33 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_CTLG_CAT_P1 | 57 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
|* 34 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ASSET | 57 | 10 | 10 |00:28:14.10 | 1236K| 512K|
|* 35 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_ASSET_U2 | 57 | 734 | 627K|00:00:01.26 | 4299 | 3327 |
| 36 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ASSET_OM | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 26 | 2 |
|* 37 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_ASSET_OM_U1 | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 26 | 2 |
| 38 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_CONTACT | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.10 | 36 | 18 |
|* 39 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_CONTACT_P1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.04 | 26 | 9 |
| 40 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ADDR_PER | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.11 | 36 | 20 |
|* 41 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ADDR_PER_P1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.04 | 26 | 10 |
| 42 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
|* 43 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
| 44 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
|* 45 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
| 46 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
|* 47 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 0 | 0 |
| 48 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.09 | 46 | 18 |
|* 49 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.05 | 26 | 9 |
| 50 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.09 | 55 | 32 |
|* 51 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.02 | 26 | 8 |
| 52 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT_X | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.13 | 40 | 18 |
|* 53 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_X_U1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.06 | 30 | 9 |
|* 54 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_PARTY_P1 | 10 | 1 | 0 |00:00:00.01 | 5 | 0 |
| 55 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ASSET_BU | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.18 | 50 | 29 |
|* 56 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_ASSET_BU_U1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.11 | 40 | 19 |
| 57 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ORG_EXT | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.01 | 36 | 0 |
|* 58 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ORG_EXT_U3 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.01 | 26 | 0 |
|* 59 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_PARTY_P1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.01 | 26 | 0 |
| 60 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ASSET_X | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.10 | 50 | 20 |
|* 61 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | S_ASSET_X_U1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.03 | 40 | 10 |
| 62 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_ASSET | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.12 | 46 | 20 |
|* 63 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_ASSET_P1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.06 | 36 | 10 |
| 64 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | S_PROD_INT | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.01 | 26 | 0 |
|* 65 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | S_PROD_INT_P1 | 10 | 1 | 10 |00:00:00.01 | 16 | 0 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
23 - filter("T9"."VER_NUM"=:1)
25 - access("T3"."ROW_ID"="T9"."VOD_ID")
27 - access("T14"."CFG_MODEL_ID"="T3"."OBJECT_NUM")
29 - access("T14"."PR_PROD_LN_ID"="T7"."ROW_ID")
31 - access("T14"."CG_PR_CTLG_CAT_ID"="T16"."ROW_ID")
33 - access("T16"."PAR_CAT_ID"="T10"."ROW_ID")
34 - filter((("T23"."PAR_ASSET_ID" IS NULL AND "T23"."SERIAL_NUM" IS NOT NULL) OR ("T23"."X_PHONE_NUMBER" IS NOT NULL AND
"T23"."PAR_ASSET_ID" IS NOT NULL)))
35 - access("T23"."PROD_ID"="T14"."ROW_ID")
37 - access("T23"."ROW_ID"="T8"."PAR_ROW_ID")
39 - access("T23"."OWNER_CON_ID"="T11"."ROW_ID")
41 - access("T23"."PER_ADDR_ID"="T20"."ROW_ID")
43 - access("T23"."RTNG_DLR_ID"="T1"."PAR_ROW_ID")
45 - access("T23"."DLR_ID"="T4"."PAR_ROW_ID")
47 - access("T23"."PREF_SRV_DLR_ID"="T17"."PAR_ROW_ID")
49 - access("T23"."BILL_ACCNT_ID"="T18"."PAR_ROW_ID")
51 - access("T23"."OWNER_ACCNT_ID"="T21"."PAR_ROW_ID")
53 - access("T23"."OWNER_ACCNT_ID"="T6"."PAR_ROW_ID")
54 - access("T23"."PR_CON_ID"="T12"."ROW_ID")
56 - access("T23"."ROW_ID"="T15"."ASSET_ID" AND "T23"."BU_ID"="T15"."BU_ID")
58 - access("T15"."BU_ID"="T5"."PAR_ROW_ID")
59 - access("T15"."BU_ID"="T13"."ROW_ID")
61 - access("T23"."ROW_ID"="T22"."PAR_ROW_ID")
63 - access("T23"."ROOT_ASSET_ID"="T19"."ROW_ID")
65 - access("T19"."PROD_ID"="T2"."ROW_ID")
226 rows selected.
SQL > -
Good Explain plan long execution.
Hi,
on 11.2.0.3 for a query I have following explain plan which sounds good but when executed by an application it does not finish.
It waits on db file scattered read. Thanks for your ideas.
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | INSERT STATEMENT | | 1 | 427 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | LOAD TABLE CONVENTIONAL | PS_PC_RT_RUN_TA24 | | | | |
|* 2 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| PS_PRT_PRICE4 | 1 | 427 | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | PSAPRT_PRICE4 | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | PS_PC_RT_RUN_TA24 | 1 | 57 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Query Block Name / Object Alias (identified by operation id):
1 - SEL$1
3 - SEL$1 / PRT@SEL$1
4 - SEL$1 / PRT@SEL$1
5 - SEL$2 / A@SEL$2
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter( NOT EXISTS (SELECT 0 FROM "PS_PC_RT_RUN_TA24" "A" WHERE
"A"."BUSINESS_UNIT"=:B1 AND "A"."PROJECT_ID"=:B2 AND "A"."ACTIVITY_ID"=:B3 AND
"A"."RESOURCE_ID"=:B4 AND "A"."PROCESS_INSTANCE"=2690469))
4 - access("PRT"."PROCESS_INSTANCE"=2690469)
5 - filter("A"."BUSINESS_UNIT"=:B1 AND "A"."PROJECT_ID"=:B2 AND "A"."ACTIVITY_ID"=:B3
AND "A"."RESOURCE_ID"=:B4 AND "A"."PROCESS_INSTANCE"=2690469)
SQL> show parameter optimizer
NAME TYPE VALUE
optimizer_capture_sql_plan_baselines boolean FALSE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 2
optimizer_features_enable string 11.2.0.3
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_mode string ALL_ROWS
optimizer_secure_view_merging boolean TRUE
optimizer_use_invisible_indexes boolean FALSE
optimizer_use_pending_statistics boolean FALSE
optimizer_use_sql_plan_baselines boolean TRUEmany thanks Nicolas,
yes it is the famous standard PC_Pricing on step PC_PRICING.COPYTA2.Step01.S.
The query is :
INSERT INTO PS_PC_RT_RUN_TA24 (PROCESS_INSTANCE, BUSINESS_UNIT, PROJECT_ID, ACTIVITY_ID, RESOURCE_ID, LINE_NO, SEQ_NUM, RESOURCE_ID_FROM, ANALYSIS_TYPE, RESOURCE_TYPE, RESOURCE_CATEGORY, RESOURCE_SUB_CAT, CONTRACT_NUM, CONTRACT_LINE_NUM, RESOURCE_QUANTITY, FOREIGN_AMOUNT, RATE_OPTION, RATE_AMT, AMOUNT, TRANS_DT, ACCOUNTING_DT, INFO_FLD1, INFO_FLD2, EMPLID, TIME_RPTG_CD, JOBCODE, UOM_BILL, UNIT_OF_MEASURE, UNIT_AMT, FOREIGN_CURRENCY, RT_TYPE, OPRID, OVERRIDE_SRC, SRC_AN_TYPE, SRC_RES_CATEGORY, SRC_RES_SUB_CAT, SRC_RES_TYPE, TO_CUR, BUSINESS_UNIT_GL, ACCOUNT, ALTACCT, DEPTID, OPERATING_UNIT, PRODUCT, FUND_CODE, CLASS_FLD, PROGRAM_CODE, BUDGET_REF, AFFILIATE, AFFILIATE_INTRA1, AFFILIATE_INTRA2, CHARTFIELD1, CHARTFIELD2, CHARTFIELD3, SYSTEM_SOURCE, PROCESS_STATUS, BI_DISTRIB_STATUS, RATE_PLAN, DESCR, DESCR1, PROJ_ROLE, TIER_PRICE_SW, PRICED_RATE, RATE_MULT, RATE_DIV, CST_DISTRIB_STATUS, REV_DISTRIB_STATUS, RATE_DEF_TYPE, BUSINESS_UNIT_WO, WO_ID, WO_TASK_ID, RSRC_TYPE, RES_LN_NBR, PC_TEMPLATE_ID, COMBO_STATUS, COST_RATE, BILL_RATE, TEMPLATE_TYPE, RATE_PLAN_TYPE, RATE_DEF_BIL, RATE_DEF_COST, RATE_DEF_REV) SELECT PRT.PROCESS_INSTANCE, PRT.BUSINESS_UNIT, PRT.PROJECT_ID, PRT.ACTIVITY_ID, PRT.RESOURCE_ID, 1, 0, PRT.RESOURCE_ID, PRT.ANALYSIS_TYPE, PRT.RESOURCE_TYPE, PRT.RESOURCE_CATEGORY, PRT.RESOURCE_SUB_CAT, PRT.CONTRACT_NUM, PRT.CONTRACT_LINE_NUM, PRT.RESOURCE_QUANTITY, PRT.FOREIGN_AMOUNT, ' ', 0, 0, PRT.TRANS_DT, PRT.ACCOUNTING_DT, ' ', ' ', PRT.EMPLID, PRT.TIME_RPTG_CD, PRT.JOBCODE, ' ', PRT.UNIT_OF_MEASURE, 0, PRT.FOREIGN_CURRENCY, PRT.RT_TYPE, PRT.OPRID, 'N', ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', ' ', PRT.BUSINESS_UNIT_GL, PRT.ACCOUNT, PRT.ALTACCT, PRT.DEPTID, PRT.OPERATING_UNIT, PRT.PRODUCT, PRT.FUND_CODE, PRT.CLASS_FLD, PRT.PROGRAM_CODE, PRT.BUDGET_REF, PRT.AFFILIATE, PRT.AFFILIATE_INTRA1, PRT.AFFILIATE_INTRA2, PRT.CHARTFIELD1, PRT.CHARTFIELD2, PRT.CHARTFIELD3, PRT.SYSTEM_SOURCE, PRT.PROCESS_STATUS, PRT.BI_DISTRIB_STATUS, PRT.RATE_PLAN, PRT.DESCR, ' ', PRT.PROJ_ROLE, PRT.TIER_PRICE_SW, PRT.PRICED_RATE, PRT.RATE_MULT, PRT.RATE_DIV, PRT.CST_DISTRIB_STATUS, PRT.REV_DISTRIB_STATUS, PRT.RATE_DEF_TYPE, PRT.BUSINESS_UNIT_WO, PRT.WO_ID, PRT.WO_TASK_ID, PRT.RSRC_TYPE, PRT.RES_LN_NBR, PRT.PC_TEMPLATE_ID, ' ', 0, 0, PRT.TEMPLATE_TYPE, PRT.RATE_PLAN_TYPE, PRT.RATE_DEF_BIL, PRT.RATE_DEF_COST, PRT.RATE_DEF_REV FROM PS_PRT_PRICE4 PRT WHERE PRT.PROCESS_INSTANCE = 2690469 AND NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 'X' FROM PS_PC_RT_RUN_TA24 A
WHERE A.BUSINESS_UNIT = PRT.BUSINESS_UNIT AND A.PROJECT_ID = PRT.PROJECT_ID AND A.ACTIVITY_ID = PRT.ACTIVITY_ID AND A.RESOURCE_ID = PRT.RESOURCE_ID AND A.PROCESS_INSTANCE = 2690469)
====================End of query=================================
Best regards.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Can't see databases in Hyperion Workspace or Web Analysis 9.3.1
Hi, I installed all the components of reporting and analysis (services, ui services, client). I had also installed Shared services, created a user and created an essbase database/application. However, when I log on to the Workspace, I can't see any d
-
Find does not work in numbers for iPad.
help, my company has an excel document which I have saved to numbers. But the find option DOES NOT WORK, when the find option is tapped the find screen shows up but only accepts on or two letters. Then when the wheel/ tool is presses the screen goes
-
How to create dynamic rows in a table
Hi All, in my application i want to create rows dynamically by pressing enter button or else i can use button,once i click the button new row should come,that row should allow to enter values,like input field. please can any one help me in this. rega
-
Amaya 8.3-1 won't start, still. :)
I already posted this to the bug reports, but wanted to bring it up here to see if there was anyone else experiencing this problem, or if anyone had a fix: http://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?do=details&id=680 On trying to run amaya from xfce termina
-
Where can I find my backups from Palm?
I have to do a Hard Reboot to my Treo (palm software) and so I am trying to accomplish a good backup so that I can get all my third party software and information back. (I am having trouble with my email software shutting my palm software down.) How