OBIEE report performance issue when initialized

Hi, All:
Thanks for reading this First, please forgive some appropriate words, I am not good at English...
I met a problem on production, when the report is selected, It shows up very slow even I did some performance tuning on this report. And after I checked the session, when the report is selected, it still runs with some SQL with every prompt has value even It shows no result in this report.
So, my question is, Is it possible not to run this SQL or is there any other way to get better performance on this report?
Thanks for answering that.

I've definitely got plenty of suggestions. But to really help you, I need a few more details.
How many different measures do you have in the pivot table? Do you have any Time Series Analytics in there (like Ago or ToDate)? Approximately how many records are being displayed in the pivot table (100, 1,000,100,000)?
Most importantly, do you have usage tracking enabled? If not, please turn it on. John Minkjan's blog here can help you enable this. [http://obiee101.blogspot.com/2008/08/obiee-setting-up-usage-tracking.html]
If you manage to turn on usage tracking, we should be able see how much time is spent on the database versus OBIEE. If it turns out the bottleneck is the database, then you'll need to work with your DBA to tune the database.
-Joe

Similar Messages

Performance issues when creating a Report / Query in Discoverer

Hi forum,
Hope you are can help, it involves a performance issues when creating a Report / Query.
I have a Discoverer Report that currently takes less than 5 seconds to run. After I add a condition to bring back Batch Status that = Posted we cancelled the query after reaching 20 minutes as this is way too long. If I remove the condition the query time goes back to less than 5 seconds.
Please see attached the SQL Inspector Plan:
Before Condition
SELECT STATEMENT
SORT GROUP BY
VIEW SYS
SORT GROUP BY
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS
AND-EQUAL
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_N2
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_N1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES
INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_N1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL_U1
INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_NORM_HIER_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_LINES
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_LINES_N1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_HEADERS
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_DAILY_CONVERSION_TYPES_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_CATEGORIES_TL_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_BUDGET_VERSIONS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_ENCUMBRANCE_TYPES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_BATCHES
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_PERIODS
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_PERIODS_U1
After Condition
SELECT STATEMENT
SORT GROUP BY
VIEW SYS
SORT GROUP BY
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
TABLE ACCESS FULL GL.GL_JE_BATCHES
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_HEADERS
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_N1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_ENCUMBRANCE_TYPES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_DAILY_CONVERSION_TYPES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_BUDGET_VERSIONS_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_CATEGORIES_TL_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_LINES
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_LINES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_PERIODS
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_PERIODS_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES
INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_N1
INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_NORM_HIER_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
Is there anything i can do in Discoverer Desktop / Administration to avoid this problem.
Many thanks,
Lance

Hi Rod,
I've tried the condition (Batch Status||'' = 'Posted') as you suggested, but the qeury time is still over 20 mins. To test i changed it to (Batch Status||'' = 'Unposted') and the query was returned within seconds again.
Ive been doing some more digging and have found the database view that is linked to the Journal Batches folder. See below.
I think the problem is with the column using DECODE. When querying the column in TOAD the value of P is returned. But in discoverer the condition is done on the value Posted. Im not too sure how DECODE works, but think this could be the causing some sort of issue with Full Table Scans. How do we get around this?
Lance
DECODE( JOURNAL_BATCH1.STATUS,
'+', 'Unable to validate or create CTA',
'+*', 'Was unable to validate or create CTA',
'-','Invalid or inactive rounding differences account in journal entry',
'-*', 'Modified invalid or inactive rounding differences account in journal entry',
'<', 'Showing sequence assignment failure',
'<*', 'Was showing sequence assignment failure',
'>', 'Showing cutoff rule violation',
'>*', 'Was showing cutoff rule violation',
'A', 'Journal batch failed funds reservation',
'A*', 'Journal batch previously failed funds reservation',
'AU', 'Showing batch with unopened period',
'B', 'Showing batch control total violation',
'B*', 'Was showing batch control total violation',
'BF', 'Showing batch with frozen or inactive budget',
'BU', 'Showing batch with unopened budget year',
'C', 'Showing unopened reporting period',
'C*', 'Was showing unopened reporting period',
'D', 'Selected for posting to an unopened period',
'D*', 'Was selected for posting to an unopened period',
'E', 'Showing no journal entries for this batch',
'E*', 'Was showing no journal entries for this batch',
'EU', 'Showing batch with unopened encumbrance year',
'F', 'Showing unopened reporting encumbrance year',
'F*', 'Was showing unopened reporting encumbrance year',
'G', 'Showing journal entry with invalid or inactive suspense account',
'G*', 'Was showing journal entry with invalid or inactive suspense account',
'H', 'Showing encumbrance journal entry with invalid or inactive reserve account',
'H*', 'Was showing encumbrance journal entry with invalid or inactive reserve account',
'I', 'In the process of being posted',
'J', 'Showing journal control total violation',
'J*', 'Was showing journal control total violation',
'K', 'Showing unbalanced intercompany journal entry',
'K*', 'Was showing unbalanced intercompany journal entry',
'L', 'Showing unbalanced journal entry by account category',
'L*', 'Was showing unbalanced journal entry by account category',
'M', 'Showing multiple problems preventing posting of batch',
'M*', 'Was showing multiple problems preventing posting of batch',
'N', 'Journal produced error during intercompany balance processing',
'N*', 'Journal produced error during intercompany balance processing',
'O', 'Unable to convert amounts into reporting currency',
'O*', 'Was unable to convert amounts into reporting currency',
'P', 'Posted',
'Q', 'Showing untaxed journal entry',
'Q*', 'Was showing untaxed journal entry',
'R', 'Showing unbalanced encumbrance entry without reserve account',
'R*', 'Was showing unbalanced encumbrance entry without reserve account',
'S', 'Already selected for posting',
'T', 'Showing invalid period and conversion information for this batch',
'T*', 'Was showing invalid period and conversion information for this batch',
'U', 'Unposted',
'V', 'Journal batch is unapproved',
'V*', 'Journal batch was unapproved',
'W', 'Showing an encumbrance journal entry with no encumbrance type',
'W*', 'Was showing an encumbrance journal entry with no encumbrance type',
'X', 'Showing an unbalanced journal entry but suspense not allowed',
'X*', 'Was showing an unbalanced journal entry but suspense not allowed',
'Z', 'Showing invalid journal entry lines or no journal entry lines',
'Z*', 'Was showing invalid journal entry lines or no journal entry lines', NULL ),

Accrual Reconciliation Load Run report performance issue.

we have significant performance issues when running accrual reconciliation load run report. we had to cancel after have it run for a day. any idea on how to resolve it?

We experienced similar issue. As the runtime of this report depends on the input parameters. Remember, your first run of this report going to take significant amount of time and the subsequent runs will be much shorter.
But w had to apply the patches referred in the MOS article to resolve the performance issue.
Accrual Reconciliation Load Run Has Slow Performance [ID 1490578.1]
Thanks,
Sunthar....

Performance issue when a Direct I/O option is selected

Hello Experts,
One of my customers has a performance issue when a Direct I/O option is selected. Reports that there was increase in memory usage when Direct I/O storage option is selected when compared to Buffered I/O option.
There are two applications on the server of type BSO. When using Buffered I/O, experienced a high level of Read and Write I/O's. Using Direct I/O reduces the Read and Write I/O's, but dramatically increases memory usage.
Other Information -
a) Environment Details
HSS - 9.3.1.0.45, AAS - 9.3.1.0.0.135, Essbase - 9.3.1.2.00 (64-bit)
OS: Microsoft Windows x64 (64-bit) 2003 R2
b) What is the memory usage when Buffered I/O and Direct I/O is used? How about running calculations, database restructures, and database queries? Do these processes take much time for execution?
Application 1: Buffered 700MB, Direct 5GB
Application 2: Buffered 600MB to 1.5GB, Direct 2GB
Calculation times may increase from 15 minutes to 4 hours. Same with restructure.
c) What is the current Database Data cache; Data file cache and Index cache values?
Application 1: Buffered (Index 80MB, Data 400MB), Direct (Index 120MB; Data File 4GB, Data 480MB).
Application 2: Buffered (Index 100MB, Data 300MB), Direct (Index 700MB, Data File 1.5GB, Data 300MB)
d) What is the total size of the ess0000x.pag files and ess0000x.ind files?
Application 1: Page File 20GB, Index 1.7GB.
Application 2: Page 3GB, index 700MB.
Any suggestions on how to improve the performance when Direct I/O is selected? Any performance documents relating to above scenario would be of great help.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sudhir

Sudhir,
Do you work at a help desk or are you a consultant? you ask such a varied range of questions I think the former. If you do work at a help desk, don't you have a next level support that could help you? If you are a consultant, I suggest getting together with another consultant that actually knows more. You might also want to close some of your questions,. You have 24 open and perhaps give points to those that helped you.

Performance Issues when editing large PDFs

We are using Adobe 9 and X Professional and are experiencing performance issues when attempting to edit large PDF files. (Windows 7 OS). When editing PDFs that are 200+ pages, we are seeing pregnated pauses (that feel like lockups), slow open times and slow to print issues.
Are there any tips or tricks with regard to working with these large documents that would improve performance?

You said "edit." If you are talking about actual editing, that should be done in the original and a new PDF created. Acrobat is not a very good editing tool and should only be used for minor, critical edits.
If you are talking about simply using the PDF, a lot depends on the structure of the PDF. If it is full of graphics, it will be slow. You can improve this performance by using the PDF Optimize to reduce graphic resolution and such. You may very likely have a bloated PDF that is causing the problem and optimizing the structure should help.
Be sure to work on a copy.

Oracle Retail 13 - Performance issues when open, save, approving worksheets

Hi Guys,
Recently we started facing performance issues when we started working with Oracle Retail 13 worksheets from within the java GUI at clients desktops.
We run Oracle Retail 13.1 powered by Oracle Database 11g R1 and AS 10g in latest release.
Issues:
- Opening, saving, approving worksheets with approx 9 thousands of items takes up to 15 minutes.
- Time for smaller worksheets is also around 10 minutes just to open a worksheet
- Also just to open multiple worksheets takes "ages" up to 10-15 minuts
Questions:
- Is it expected performance for such worksheets?
- What is your experience with Oracle Retail 13 in terms of performance while working with worksheets - how much time does it normally take to open edit save a worksheet?
- What are the average expected times for such operations?
Any feedback and hints would be much appreciated.
Cheers!!

Hi,
I guess you mean Order/Buyer worksheets?
This is not normal, should be quicker, matter of seconds to at most a minute.
Database side tuning is where I would look for clues.
And the obvious question: remember any changes to anything that may have caused the issue? Are the table and index statistics freshly gathered?
Best regards, Erik Ykema

Report performance Issue in BI Answers

Hi All,
We have a performance issues with reports. Report is running more than 10 mins. we took query from the session log and ran it in database, at that time it took not more than 2 mins. We have verified proper indexes on the where clause columns.
Could any once suggest to improve the performance in BI answers?
Thanks in advance,

I hope you dont have many case statements and complex calculations that you do in the Answers.
Next thing you need to monitor is how many rows of data that you are trying to retrieve from the query. If the volume is huge then it takes time to do the formatting on the Answers as you are going to dump huge volumes of data. Database(like teradata) returns initially like 1-2000 records if you hit show all records then even db is gonna fair amount of time if you are dumping many records
hope it helps
thanks
Prash

Database migrated from Oracle 10g to 11g Discoverer report performance issu

Hi All,
We are now getting issue in Discoverer Report performance as the report is keep on running when database got upgrade from 10g to 11g.
In database 10g the report is working fine but the same report is not working fine in 11g.
The query i have changed as I have passed the date format TO_CHAR("DD-MON-YYYY" and removed the NVL & TRUNC function from the existing query.
The report is now working fine in Database 11g backhand but when I am using the same query in Discoverer it is not working and report is keep on running.
Please advise.
Regards,

Pl post exact OS, database and Discoverer versions. After the upgrade, have statistics been updated ? Have you traced the Discoverer query to determine where the performance issue is ?
How To Find Oracle Discoverer Diagnostic and Tracing Guides [ID 290658.1]
How To Enable SQL Tracing For Discoverer Sessions [ID 133055.1]
Discoverer 11g: Performance degradation after Upgrade to Database 11g [ID 1514929.1]
HTH
Srini

How to get around a performance issue when dealing with a lot of data

Hello All,
This is an academic question really, I'm not sure what I'm going to do with my issue, but I have some options. I was wondering if anyone would like to throw in their two cents on what they would do.
I have a report, the users want to see all agreements and all conditions related to the updating of rebates and the affected invoices. From a technical perspective ENT6038-KONV-KONP-KONA-KNA1. THese are the tables I have to hit. The problem is that when they retroactively update rebate conditions they can hit thousands of invoices, which blossoms out to thousands of conditions...you see the problem. I simply have too much data to grab, it times out.
I've tried everything around the code. If you have a better way to get price conditions and agreement numbers off of thousands of invoices, please let me know what that is.
I have a couple of options.
1) Use shared memory to preload the data for the report. This would work, but I'm not going to know what data is needed to be loaded until report run time. They put in a date. I simply can't preload everything. I don't like this option much.
2) Write a function module to do this work. When the user clicks on the button to get this particular data, it will launch the FM in background and e-mail them the results. As you know, the background job won't time out. So far this is my favored option.
Any other ideas?
Oh...nope, BI is not an option, we don't have it. I know, I'm not happy about it. We do have a data warehouse, but the prospect of working with that group makes me whince.

My two cents - firstly totally agree with Derick that its probably a good idea to go back to the business and justify their requirement in regards to reporting and "whether any user can meaningfully process all those results in an aggregate". But having dealt with customers across industries over a long period of time, it would probably be bit fanciful to expect them to change their requirements too much as in my experience neither do they understand (too much) technology nor they want to hear about technical limitations for a system etc. They want what they want if possible yesterday!
So, about dealing with performance issues within ABAP, I'm sure you must be already using efficient programming techniques like using Hash internal tables with Unique Keys, accessing rows of the table using Field-Symbols and all that but what I was going to suggest to you is probably look at using [Extracts|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/9f/db9ed135c111d1829f0000e829fbfe/content.htm]. I've had to deal with this couple of times in the past when dealing with massive amount of data and I found it to be very efficient in regards to performance. A good point to remember when using Extracts that, I quote from SAP Help, "The size of an extract dataset is, in principle, unlimited. Extracts larger than 500KB are stored in operating system files. The practical size of an extract is up to 2GB, as long as there is enough space in the filesystem."
Hope this helps,
Cheers,
Sougata.

Hyperion Interactive reporting performance issue.

Hi,
We created a report in Hyperion Interactive reporting using Hyperion Essbase as database connection file .
Report performance was good in Interactive reporting Studio we don't have any problem in studio.
when we open the the report in Hyperion Workspace We are facing performance issue of the report and also when i hit refresh button to refresh data in the Workspace,i am getting the following error message
*"An Interactive Reporting Service error has occurred - Failed to acquire requested service. Error Code : 2001"*
Any suggestions to resolve this will be really helpful.
Thanks in advance
Thanks
Vamsi
Edited by: user9363364 on Aug 24, 2010 7:49 AM
Edited by: user9363364 on Sep 1, 2010 7:59 AM

Hi
i also faced such an issue and then i found the answer on metalink
Error: "An Interactive Reporting Service Error has Occurred. Failed to Acquire Requested Service. Error Code: 2001" when Processing a bqy Report in Workspace. [ID 1117395.1]
Applies to:
Hyperion BI+ - Version: 11.1.1.2.00 and later [Release: 11.1 and later ]
Information in this document applies to any platform.
Symptoms
Obtaining the following error when trying to process a BQY that uses an Essbase data source in Workspace:
"An Interactive Reporting Service error has occurred. Failed to acquire requested service. Error Code: 2001".
Cause
The name of the data source in the CMC contained the machine name in fully qualified name format whereas the OCE contained the machine name only. This mismatch in machine names caused the problem. Making the machine name identical in both cases resolved the problem.
Solution
Ensure that the name of the data source as specified in the OCE in Interactive Reporting Studio matches the name specified in the CMC tool in the field "Enter the name of the data source".
In fact, all fields need to match between the OCE and the CMC Data Source.
regards
alex

IOS - Performance issues when touching screen

Hello,
I am having perfomance issues when the use keep moving one finger on the screen.
I am testing with :
- flash builder 4.7 beta 2
- air 3.5 (beta too I guess)
- iPhone 3GS running on iOS 6.0.1 (also tested on an iPad3, and even though it's less horrible, the impact is still huge compared to what you could expect).
- gpu mode
- always published as an addhoc release build (best)
Test 1-A) :
- Have a completely empty project, add a fps counter (with mouseEnabled and children false).
- run a while each frame so you force the fps under 60 (if not you won't see it going down from let's say theoric 100 to theoric 70 since fps max is 60).
like this for example :
                                        protected function framingMouseTest(e : Event) : void {
                       var t : int = getTimer();
                       while (getTimer()-t<30) {}//this will keep flash busy
Notice that when you keep your finger on the screen and move it you loose approximately 7ms per frame. (for example from 26 to 22fps or from 48 to 36 fps, depending on the time waited in your while).
Test 1-B) do the same with even stage mouseEnabled false (and you could even set it + mouseChildren off recursively from stage) : same result (-7ms). Why ? Since it is all off it shouldn't take more than 1 ms no ?
Test 1-C) add Multitouch.inputMode = MultitouchInputMode.TOUCH_POINT; Same result (found some threads saying it would help but not that much...)
Test 1-D) Multitouch.mapTouchToMouse = false;          It is a bit better but still around 5ms (didnt write down this one)
Test 1-D) Multitouch.mapTouchToMouse = false; Multitouch.inputMode = MultitouchInputMode.NONE;          It is a bit better but still around 4ms (didnt write down this one) And you have now nothing left to remove I think.
Now the horrible part :
Test 2-A)
Add some clips and subclips to your scene, containing bitmaps, results may vary depending on how much (let's say 30, I don't have the exact count on subcontainers), etc. but what's important is the difference between no finger and 1 finger moving on screen.
On normal conditions (keep some mouseEnabled for the clips you need interaction add those a listener, lets say 10 total, default values for the rest) you can get about 40ms per frame down ! (for example from 36 to 14 fps) just by touching the screen.
Test 2-B) Recursively set everything to mouseEnabled and children false after everything is added, you still get about 30ms down because of the finger, whereas it shouldn't test above the main container which already has mouseChildren false.
Test 2-C) Multitouch.mapTouchToMouse = false; Multitouch.inputMode = MultitouchInputMode.NONE; you still get about 20ms down !!! whereas you're in a mode when touch and mouseEvents shouldn't even exist.
I am really confused. My conclusions are :
Performance are really impacted whatever you do when a user touch the screen + it will get worse the more clips/depth you have. Even if everything is made to disable this.
I think anyone could test this with pretty much any app done with AIR on iOS, as long as the framerate is already <max (<60 for example), touch and move your finger and tell me what happens regarding framerate.
What I would love :
1) tell me what I am missing if you think this is due to some mistake on my part, if not :
2) better perfomance when containers have mouseChildren false. It seems obvious it still takes longer to process.
3) a mode where the touch/mouse is REALLY disabled including stage etc. It is quite obvious air does takes longer to handle touch as the scene gets more complex, even if you disable it all (seems to work only 20%...)
4) a mode where the touch/mouse is REALLY disabled, on anything but the stage. Because you might want to handle everythin just from stage coordinates, if your project allows you to, like mine. Unfortunately right now it wouldn't give you enough performance boost (well, a bit but still maybe +20ms).
PS : you don't even need to add mouselistener or touchlisteners (tested both), but if you do, it is worse.
Compared to this, I am finding rendering performance pretty decent - even though it's tough for a game on a 3GS- as long as you do it properly.

Could you open a bug report on this at bugbase.adobe.com? Please include any sample code or applications so we can quickly reproduce the problem. If you'd like to keep this private, feel free to send them to me directly ([email protected]). Also, please note in the bug if this is new behavior with the latest AIR sdk or if you've seen this in past versions too. Once added, let me know the bug number and I'll follow up internally. I've alerted the iOS team to expect this bug.
Thanks,
Chris

Deski reports performance issue

After an upgrade from BOXI Release2-SP3 to BOXI Release3.1-SP3 all the deski reports are very slow when we try to refresh them using Infoview.
For example, a specific deski report needs two minutes from Desktop Intelligence and twenty!!! minutes from Infoview. The same behavior have all the migrated deski reports. Do you have any idea/workaround??

hi,
- Set the array fetch size as 500 and array bind size as 32767 in Universe Parameters
Following links will be helpful.
http://www.forumtopics.com/busobj/viewtopic.php?t=142973&sid=0a48878553739783e77ca43ae06c5cdb
Performance issue with Deski in three tier mode
Regards,
Vamsee

XL Report performance issues

Hello All,
We are running some XL reports and facing some performance issues: 10 mins for a report to run.
We don´t plan to split this report in many other ones, and I have already run the SQL tools for reorganizing and reindexing the tables (I believe this is nothing to do with performance but ran it anyway...) without any improvements.
Can anybody be a help on this?
Thanks!

Hi Siavauch Saleki
Name the report which take too long to run, i have worked on XL report, when i run report from client system it takes some long time,
try running to run from server
another way of making it faster is go to Task manager in the process tab
Change the priority of XL Reporter , excel to HIGH
THIS WILL MAKE IT FASTER BY ALLOCATING MORE PROCESSOR TIME FROM OS TO IT
This should improve the reporting speed
Let me know how it works
Regards
Krish

Webi Reports - Performance Issues

Hi Experts,
       Right now we are using BO XI R2 version. We have 2 servers, server 1 is old and server 2 is new (AIX server u2013 new upgrade of old server).
      When I trying to schedule the report (webi) in both server, reports is running successfully. But problem is that the report scheduling time is more in new server (AIX) than old server (Server1).
There is some performance issues
Example:
Old serve     : 1 hrs (time taken)
New server : 2 hrs (time taken)
Could you please tell me how to increase the webi report performance in new server?
Regards,
Sridharan Krishnan

Hi,
How to enable Excel and Pdf option under Save as file in infoview.
When i trying to click modify option under public folder reports ,Report is getting open but i am not able to save that report as excel or pdf , since those option is disabled in infoview.
But it is enabled in user private folder Reports.
Right now we have upgraded the objects from XI R2 to BO 3.1, Since there is some difference in security rights in 3.1, Please tell me how to fix it.
BO Version u2013 3.1
Regards,
Sridharan

Report Performance Issue - Activity

Hi gurus,
I'm developing an Activity report using Transactional database (Online real time object).
the purpose of the report is to list down all contacts related activities and activities NOT related to Contact by activity owner (user id).
In order to fullfill that requirment I've created 2 report
1) All Activities related to Contact -- Report A
pull in Acitivity ID , Activity Type, Status, Contact ID
2) All Activities not related to Contact UNION All Activities related to Contact (Base report) -- Report B
to get the list of activities not related to contact i'm using Advanced filter based on result of another request which is I think is the part that slow down the query.
<Activity ID not equal to any Activity ID in Report B>
Anyone encountered performance issue due to the advanced filter in analytic before?
any input is really appriciated
Thanks in advanced,
Fina

Fina,
Union is always the last option. If you can get all record in one report, do not use union.
since all records, which you are targeting, are in the activity subject area, it is not nessecery to combine reports. add a column with the following logic
if contact id is null (or = 'Unspecified') then owner name else contact name
Hopefully, this is helping.

OBIEE report performance issue when initialized

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for