Object Comparison between different systems

Hi to all,
any of you have made a program to compare object/object versions between diferent systems (with RFCs).
Can you tell me wich Function Models and tableshave you used.
I found a very usefull Function Model SVRS_GET_VERSION_DIRECTORY_46 very usefull for my purpose but i depared myself with a strange problem. The table VRSD used in this FM have all the Objects in the System but when i tried to transport a request between 2 diferent Systems no new entry was added to VRSD in the target system so SVRS_GET_VERSION_DIRECTORY_46 is no usefull.
Any one knows if there is any customizing relative to this table or any process to catch this transported objects in the target System?
There is one entry in E070 but here thre is no reference for Object versions.
Many thanks and any help will be very Helpfull.
Thanks In advance
PPaiva

Hi Pedro,
           Can you let me know which object you are comparing? Were you not able to do remote comparision for that object?

Similar Messages

  • Transferring payments between different systems

    Our Client has SAP CR&B and Oracle Financials.
    SAP CR&B and Oracle use different Bank Accounts.
    How do other clients handle scenarios where they have move dollars between different systems?
    For example:
    A customer has a receivable of 100 dollars in SAP CR&B and another receivable of 900 dollars in Oracle A/R. 
    Customer sends a payment for 1000 dollars which gets posted in SAP and also funded in the bank account.  There is a credit of 900 on the customer account in sap.
    We need to move the 900 dollars from SAP to Oracle system.  Client wants to reverse the 1000 dollar payment posting and make a new payment posting for 100 dollars in SAP system. 
    If we make this new posting of 100 dollars - the bank clearing a/c will be off balance because we cant make the corresponding funding posting to the bank a/c since the money is already realized in the bank.

    Hi,
    I dont know if any physical connection is possible b/w your two systems-SAP CR&B and Oracle Financials.
    However, what you can do is, you can move the total amount of say $1000 to the payment clarification worklist in SAP.
    Then from there you can allocate the amount pertaining to the customer in SAP, say $100 to the customer account.
    The remaining $900 you can move to a suspense account., and then post a misc dr to offset the same using a particular set of main\sub pertaining to a GL a/c-Payments-Oracle Financials in SAP.
    In oracle, you can post a misc cr against the same GL A/c of $900 and allocate it against the  customer's account.
    At the end of the day, when you reconcile, entries in GL A/c in SAP should exaclty offset the entries of the GL A/c in Oracle.
    Hope it helps....
    Thanks,
    Amlan

  • Compare object version between BW system

    Hi,
    I want to check object version between DEV system and Quality System.
    Is there any program to do that in BI7?
    Regards,

    Hi Kobul,
      For that you should write an ABAP coding using
    BAPI_IOBJ_GETDETAIL to compare the object version of the two systems.
    Regards,
    Yokesh.

  • Idoc data  comparison between different R/3 clients.

    Hi ppl ,
    Is there a way idoc comparison can be done between different clients without going
    by Segment by Segment comparison ?
    I have a requirement wherein i have thousands of idocs in QA system and i need to
    compare those with the ones in PROD system. The segments in the idocs may vary
    depending on the data that flows from the third party system which will post idocs in R/3.
    So, the segment wise comparison of data is also ruled out .
    Do we have any standard reports which will help in achieving this purpose ?
    Please let me know how the idoc data comparison can be carried out .
    Regards,
    Nick.

    Hi Nick,
    There is no standared tools available for comparing the data of two idocs.
    By using beyond compare s/w you can check the data, but the thing is you have to download the idoc data to file format.
    By using Idoc_xml_transform function module you can download idoc data to xml format, after you can compare.
    Check this
    http://download.cnet.com/Beyond-Compare/3000-2242_4-10015731.html
    Regards
    Ramesh

  • EhP5 Report: Actual/Actual Comparison Between Different Ledgers

    Dear all,
    Hoping that someone here has faced the same challenge and found a solution...
    My client wants to see a side-by-side comparison of the financial statements for several ledgers; ideally three, but two will do.
    It appears that EhP5 includes an enhancement of the standard actual/actual comparison report which allows a comparison between two ledgers. However, we are running EhP4, and an upgrade is unlikely to happen very soon. Do you know whether the report is available separately? Our search for a separate SAP note was unsuccessful.
    Our other alternative would be to develop a report ourselves, but if a standard solution is available, that would feel rather daft...
    Thanks in advance!

    Thanks for the advice - as the system would not let me create versions for these non-FISL ledgers, I assumed it was not possible to run the report for them at all.
    Unfortunately, I do not have the actual/actual comparison for two different years built in, nor the financial statement version, so we may still have to develop a new report (as per project standards, in BI rather than ERP)...
    Kind regards

  • OSS Notes Comparison among different systems

    Hi
    How do we check if a particular OSS note is implemented in Dev , Test and also Production System.
    Normally we do a version comaprion .
    I would like to know do we follow the same approach for checking if code changes is made effective in different
    systems . I dont have authorization with SNOTE transaction .
    So is there any approach for the same.
    Appreciate the inputs
    K.Nadesh Kumar

    Hi Raj
    Thanks for the valid inputs .
    When i ran the report SCWN_NOTE_BROWSER it has asked for some selection screen parameters .
    So if i am correct
    in the Selection Screen i muct give the follwoing parameters
    SAP Note Number
    and also
    Implemented status - Completely Implemented
    and Sort order as Number (radio button)..
    Or in the other method you had suggested i can do a version management if that is the case do we take the main
    program for which the SAP OSS note might be implemeted and do a code comparison
    I have previously done only code comparion for the program through SE38
    K.Nadesh Kumar

  • Use ccBPM mainly for correlation between different systems

    In his presentation: "Design Patterns for SAP NetWeaver Exchange Infrastructure"
    William Li ,from SAP NetWeaverRIG Americas, stats that following:
    *Use ccBPM mainly for correlation processing between messages from different systems
    Although this practice is well known Ito me , would like to know what stands behind this recommendation (Except for
    eSOA BP). is it performance issue, other...
    your insights will be most wellcome.

    Nimrod Gisis wrote:Hi Nimrod,
    ccBPM offers achieving some difficult requirements easily , that means some cases using standard way of integration not possible .it is true that ccBPM scenarios uses one more layer(BPE engine) but it doesn't mean that it is going to give worst performance.
    i had done couple of implementations where we used extensively ccBPM to achive complex integration logics, i never felt ccBPM performance point of view any problems, all interfaces working perfectly in production.my view is it is really awesome.
    we have to design any interfaces by following best architectural standards in case of ccBPM also same,there is so much negative publicity about ccBPM, but is it not all true.
    the thing that intrigues me the most is the reference to different systems .
    > if lets say I have to construct a mesage from 20 other messages taken from the same applicative system....
    > will that be a "good practice" or an architectural design flop?
    >
    it is a good practise to use ccBPM in this case and it is offering correlation mechanism to maintain the reaction between messages so that you can easily differentiate and suppress the unwanted messages.
    Regards,
    Raj

  • How can i transfer the xml files between different systems?

    hello
    the appearance of xml enable the inter-communication between differences systems.but
    i don't know how,such as following scinario:
    in the client side,we use the console that is written by using c#,if i finish
    filling the text boxes that are within the console,click the submit button,the
    console will generate a xml format document.i want the other application that
    is written by using jsp and servlet and deployed in weblogic server to receive
    the xml document,then process the document.
    but i don't know how i can transfer the xml files between the two applications
    that is written in different languages? can i use http protocol?
    thanks for any helps!

    Yes, you can use the HTTP protocol as a transport for the XML message, this
    is basically what the HTTP binding for SOAP does. The key is using a
    packaging mechanism that different applications will understand, otherwise
    only your own applications will know how to extract and process the XML
    messages you send between them.
    "zbcong" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:3e68318e$[email protected]..
    >
    hello
    the appearance of xml enable the inter-communication between differencessystems.but
    i don't know how,such as following scinario:
    in the client side,we use the console that is written by using c#,if ifinish
    filling the text boxes that are within the console,click the submitbutton,the
    console will generate a xml format document.i want the other applicationthat
    is written by using jsp and servlet and deployed in weblogic server toreceive
    the xml document,then process the document.
    but i don't know how i can transfer the xml files between the twoapplications
    that is written in different languages? can i use http protocol?
    thanks for any helps!

  • Copy Transport Request (customizing-workbench) between different systems

    Hello guys !
    I have a question.
    I can copy transport request of customizing and workbench from ECC 6.0 system to another ECC 6.0, with the same levels of support packages and patch realease, but one of the systems in Windows and another in AIX?. The database is the same: oracle.
    Thanks guys!!!
    dcardena

    Hi Dcardena,
    You can very well copy the request. Different OS platforms won't make any difference.
    Regards
    Sourabh Majumdar

  • Transport Mailboxes between different systems

    Hi,
    I've recently been in a situation where I had to transport 35 mailboxes from one GW7 system to another GW7 system (2 seperate networks). The way we did this was by archiving each of the mailboxes in the first system, renamed the fid and restore in the mailboxes created in the new system.
    Besides that this was a very time consuming and tedious procedure, especially with some large mailboxes involved, we also encountered situations where archives were corrupted for some reason.
    I expected that such 'migration' would be far easier then one from for example Exchange to GroupWise, but after this experience give me the latter anytime!
    Did I overlook something and IS there a much easier and less risky method of performing such migration?
    I expect to have a couple more of these migrations coming up, so any suggestions are welcome.
    Regards,
    Eduard

    Originally Posted by dzanre
    There really is no way to transfer mail to another GW system other than as you have indicated. Now, if you are creating the "new" system for the migration yourself, you could create a secondary domain and PO, move the users, and then "release" the domain after the fact - but if the systems are already in place with users in both of them and you can't start over, moving mail from one system to the other really does require
    archive/unarchive.
    I have a situation where I am creating the "new" system. My "new" system does not have any users in it yet.
    Which GW System would you create the secondary domain & PO in, OLD or NEW? What do you mean by ( "release" the domain )

  • Backup and Restore between different systems

    ALCON:
    I am considering to get a new desktop Mac soon, and currently my only Mac is my MacBook Pro 17", which I use daily.
    One of the things that I hope to accomplish (though not the reason for the purchase) is to freshen my configuration by installing all my applications and moving my data to the new machine so as it get it more organized. Once this is accomplished, what architectural or other issues would I run into if I made a full Time Machine backup of say an iMac, and then tried to restore it to a MacBook Pro so I had a duplicate of my new configuration/installation on the MacBook Pro then?

    Baltwo:
    Hey no problem on the mixup concerning my intentions.
    I am not sure I follow your English exactly, but "f you migrate from the old on initial boot with the new one, none of that stuff won't transfer. " means using Setup Assistant on the new Mac Pro to migrate from the MBP, exactly what "none of that stuff won't transfer"?
    1) If I migrate from MBP to Mac Pro, will it migrate my applications or just my data?
    (bear in mind, both are Intel systems, and both will be running the same version of MacOS)
    2) The /Library directory has more than just cache files, it has many other things in it, for example I have seen customer's systems where they had Adobe help files in their from versions of Adobe software they had long since uninstalled. To what extent does the /Library and other such (local user libraries too) get migrated?
    3) You have given me another idea, which is that once I get the Mac Pro properly setup, why not just do the reverse? Install a fresh MacOS onto the MBP, and pretend I am "migrating back" (from Mac Pro to MBP) using Setup Assistant? Let Apple's software worry about making it work, ay?!!
    Thanks again, I shall do some more research but you have given me some food for though, and some good ideas too with regard to how to leverage Setup Assistant to my advantage more fully.
    Stuart

  • Comparison insertion/search time between different Collection class

    Hi,
    Does someone know where I can find a clear an complete comparison between different JAVA class which implements interface Collection?
    I want to compare:
    - elements insertion time
    - elements search/removal time
    Thank you very much in advance
    Diego

    from wikipedia: Its purpose is to characterize a function's behavior for very large (or very small) inputs in a simple but rigorous way that enables comparison to other functions.
    meaning if I ask how quick an algorithm is you might say it completes in 10 seconds but the next time you run it it might take 8 seconds. It kind of depends on what else your computer is doing/ how fast your computer is or how much data you are putting through ie if the puter has little memory it might need to use virtual memory which will have an effect on your performance.
    Big O notation identifies how much work has to be carried out. The easiest example is a simple search of an array:
    for (int i = 0; i < array.length; i++) {
      if (array[i] == "weijewr") {
        return i;
    }Where n represents a number of elements:
    This takes O(n) (big Oh of N) as potentially you need to look at each element.
    if you were to write a standard bubble sort it would be O(n2) as potentially you need to iterate the array once for each element.

  • Mapping in interconnect between different Business Objects

    I want to know how to do transformation and mapping between different business objects in interconnects.
    Always,We have a very complex SQL,when We do intergration
    with Oracle interconnect ,We use DB Adapter or Jdbc Adapter,but the complex SQL have to be excuted in the resource DB or the destination DB which may be a big pressure to them ,I think can We use different Business Objects, and do the Mappings in interconnect,so the big pressure will be on the interconnect server just like the ETL tools, But I just find that Interconnect can do tranformation and mapping in one Business Object ,how can I do? Is anyone meet this problem like me ?thanks for discussion.

    For me, Business Objects are logical groupings of business processes. For example, we have a Business Object called "Maintain_Employees". Under this we have 1 Procedure (Create_Employee) and 2 Events (Update_Employee and Delete_Employee).
    We have 1 Oracle system interfacing with 23 other legacy systems. Some of these legacy systems will be using this "Maintain_Employees" Business Object (Common View), and our main transformations will be between the Common View and the legacy Application Views.
    We are using a number of techniques to assist in "validating" data in the InterConnect. The main ones are using 'Cross Reference Tables (XREF)' and 'DatabaseOperation' transformations. By using 'Content Based Routing' we are able to send the right message to the right legacy system, and therefore do the right transformation/validation on the message payload. However, this is only a small part of a complex puzzle.
    I also have the "problem" of having "very complex SQL" on our Oracle system too. This is not unusual when using the InterConnect.
    To my mind, the InterConnect does 2 main operations. Firstly, it performs some message transformation (mapping), and secondly, it acts as a transportation engine (routing) using the adapters.
    The remainder of the effort required to create or consume the message resides with the Applications themselves. Whether it is parsing an XML CLOB payload, inserting data into staging tables, writing to log files, pre-processing data, calling API's or something else, your Application side programming and processing overhead can get large.
    The trade off it to ask the question, do I want to be able to track and manage messages from start to finish in high detail? Or can I trust that all message payload data will be consumed with no additional processing on the Application side?
    My experience has shown that the bottleneck is always at the Application side, and almost never in the InterConnect.
    The short answer to your first question is "You are right. Mappings can take place only between Application Views and Common Views only - not between Business Objects.".
    To answer your second question "Probably everyone reading this forum has this problem. The intelligence that is able to really interpret message data, validate it and process it is only found in the Application, not the InterConnect. You could, however, use the Workflow engine within OAI in order to provide additional pre-validation, human interaction and logic, but this too could be complex."
    At my current client, we are architecting an Application OAI Message handling schema. This will contain staging tables, pre-processing tables, "OAI" wrapper PL/SQL scripts, "APPS" wrapper PL/SQL scripts and Message Logging and Exception tables. Ours will be a complex set of PL/SQL processes too.
    I hope this helps, just in letting you know that you are not alone with this problem.
    I wonder if anyone else would like to share how they have architected their InterConnect and Application side mapping and transformation solutions.

  • Massive copy of BW transformation between different source system

    Hi all,
    in my BW I have different source systems. I have mapped several objects to one source system.
    Now I need to copy all the transformation to other source systems. These source system are different instance of ECCs, there are the same extractor in all the systems.
    I can't use the BDLS becouse these move the transformations between the system not copy it.
    I try to create a Transport and using the Conversion of Logical System Names but this change only the objects with source sytems dependencies, it don't change the technical name of transformation, and do not create a tranformation to the new system but overwrite the existing one.
    Do you know if there are some program or some procedure to copy transformation between sourcesystem in BW?
    Thanks in advance
    Mario

    Hi,
    you can do a Retrofit (System copy), Generally, retrofit happens between two different BW systems.
    check with your basis team if the retrofit is possible with in the same BW system but for different clients.
    Note : System copy will overwrite all the objects.
    Regards,
    Sudheer

  • Want to compare same object in different systems

    hi all,
    i want to compare same object in different systems
    example:
    same transfer rule in BID to be compared with the one in BIT/BIP
    in these kind of cases, pls help me on how to do the comparison.
    as i have to do some enhancement in BID and release that changes to BIT/P. but while manually checking i might also miss out any important changes which might create issues.
    pls suggest.

    Could you please use the below table for comparision.
    Cubes      RSDCUBE
    DSO's (to identify DSOu2019s based on time stamp field)     RSODSO
    Multiproviders     RSDCUBEMULTI
    Infosets     RSQISET
    Trasnformations      RSTRAN
    DTP's     RSBKDTP, RSBKDTPSTAT
    Trasnfer strcuture     RSTS
    Infopackages     RSLDPIO
    Update Rules     RSUPDINFO
    Aggregates     RSDAGGDIR/RSDAGGDIR
    Process Chians     RSPCCHAIN
    OHD's     
    data sources status      ROOSOURCE,RSDS
    Regards,
    Saveen Kumar

Maybe you are looking for