Object id of Issue of goods CFL

Hi,
Alll............
I need an information
i want object of CFL(Issue for production) lisi of Goods issue
plz provide me object id of goods issue
by
Firos.C

Hi Firoz,
Object Type for Good Issue is 60.
Best Regards,
Satish. B.

Similar Messages

Accounting entry Inter company issue of goods as Sample

Dear SAP expert
We have a process to issue Finshed goods to vendor for testing purpose.
For this, I am issuing a finished goods for testing purpose to vendor (another company code in same group) .
At that stage accounting entry for goods issue is
Cost of sales Debit
To : Finished goods inventory credit.
We have created a PO of cross company code type and created a outward delivery for cross company code replenishment.
IF we change and add VQP general modifier in GBB transaction type then all material issue of such material will be accounted as testing expenses . However there may be some material transactions which are not sample but sale of finished goods , i have explore all options in OBYC but not sure what to do .
Company is not using valuation type functionality.
*Please suggest a way out to book expenses as Testing expenses whenever finished goods are issued as sample.*
Regards
Mehta S

Hi all
Is there any risk in doing the account determination through User exit in such a scenario. I have found a user exit EXIT_SAPMM07M_001 and include z_mm_exit_zxmbcm02_05 as useful instead of mapping the whole process for this transaction.
This user exit is working fine. Any risk people feel in bypassing OBYC through User exit.
Regards
MEHTA

Restricting issue of goods to cost center with respect to material type

Dear Users,
I have a requirement like we want to restrict issue of goods to cost center with respect to material type i.e., we want to issue goods to cost center only through reservation and that too only for specific material types. Is there any standard solution for this, please provide your suggestions.
Thanks,
Manoj

Hi Ajay,
Thanks for valuable input.
I also thought in the same line , but user has the following concern on this:
Assessment Cycle: As per Users, it cannot be used because this will allocate based on allocation basis. But they need, the values that was posted at the time of transaction and as per materials. So it wont be accurate through Assessment cycle,
OKB9: They have different Cost center for different valuation area for the same GL Account.
Hence through OKB9 also, we cannot post directly to COPA.
That's the reason the above option were not adopted.
My other concern to this is:
In CKM3, we have two lines under consumption, one for Normal sales PGI and other is Cost Center.
After doing revaluation of consumption in CKMLCP, we see one line under Cost Center :Revaluation of Consumption Figure"
My question, where can I see that figure whether in any table or in Cost Center report??
If that is also available we can try to match those values and post to COPA.
Let me know your thought on this.
Thanks and regards
Kami

Enough RG1 balance is not available to issue the Goods

Hi All
I am getting this error when I run "India - Excise Invoice Generation" Request by entering the Delivery Id. The Log file of the request showing this error ORA-20199: Enough RG1 Balance is not available to issue the Goods. But when I check the on hand quantity exists. Quantity is available even after reservation and shipping is done.
Can anyone please tell me the reason and resolution if you had faced this error before.
Thanks in Advance
Prem.

Process steps are as below .
Material master with base unit "SHT-Sheet" and maintained alternative unit "M2- Square Meter" along with conversion factor 4930 M2 = 100 SHT. Incoming quantity inspection type (01) is also active on the material.
Purchase Order quantity in alternative UnM like 1500 M2.
Purchasing Info Record maintained with alternative pricing Unit “M2”.
Good Receipt Quantity posted in the alternative Unit of Measure with 1500 M2.
Usage decision recorded with Base unit Quantity 30.426 SHTs
Error - PU GR blocked stock exceeded by 0.002 SHTs : 2847 1000 M7 22
Cause of error which i observed is below.
On usage decision, system calculating stock posting quantity "30.426" / Conversion factor "( 100 / 4930 )" = 1500.002 and this quantity "1500.002" exceeded from block stock quantity 1500 as posted at the time of GR in the block stock via 103 mvt.

Why decimal Places are allowed during goods issue and Goods receipt for mat

Why decimal Places are allowed during goods issue and Goods receipt for material with unit of measure PCS.
MY config allows consumption in decimal places.
How to restrict this?
Prem Nivas

Hi,
Please check in customizing UOM (T code-CUNI).
In dimensions check the decimal point for the unit of measurement.
Regards,
Krishnendu.

Is it necessary to use this. on objects or is it just good practice?

Is it necessary to use this. on objects or is it just good practice?

warnerja wrote:
yawmark wrote:
Is it necessary to use this. on objects or is it just good practice?It's good practice to use it when it's necessary.
~No, it's only necessary to use it when it's necessary.
It's good practice to use it when it's good practice.<****/>
<****/>
<****/>
(the sound of one hand, clapping)

Goods issue and goods receipt with bar code

hi
i need to do goods issue and goods receipt using bar code
using se 73 i craeted a bar code
iwill print this bar code on external system
after printing same one will be stikked to the respective bins
i need to trigger goods issue and goods recipt by reading
barcode scanner
plz suggest how to achive this
regards
sasikanth
vst

One of the ways of triggering transactions in SAP using external systems is IDOCs
When the barcode scanner scans the barcode of the material, you can trigger the IDOC from that system which will send the material barcode, number of units, goods issue/goods receipt etc to your SAP system. Once that inbound IDOC is received in SAP, SAP will trigger the goods issue or goods receipt based on the kind of transaction.
If you can give the idea of IDOCs to your technical guy, he should be able to enable the solution. You may have to configure an IDOC in your SAP system, using teh standard IDOC type/message types meant for GI/GR
Hope this helps you

Good Issue and Good Receive in Inventory Management

Hi everybody,
I have a problem to set initial stock in inventory management, because the result between BW and R/3 are not the same.
I use ZLIS_40_S278 and use some routine to calculate total good issue and good receive based on movement type.
Before that our users already define all movement type belongs to good issue and good receive.
Basically how we can get good issue and good receive value?
Regards,
Steph.

Hi Steph
Use the following key figures
0ISSBLOSTCK - Issue quantity: blocked stock
0ISSCNSSTCK - Quantity Issued from Consignment Stock
0ISSQMSTCK - Issue quantity: stock in quality inspection
0ISSTRANSST - Issue Quantity: Stock in Transit
0ISSTOTSTCK - Issue Quantity Total Stock
0ISSVALSTCK - Quantity Issued from Valuated Stock
0RECBLOSTCK - Receipt Quantity: Blocked Stock
0RECCNSSTCK - Quantity Received into Consignment Stock
0RECQMSTCK - Receipt Quantity: Stock in Quality Inspection
0RECTRANSST - Receipt Quantity: Stock in Transit
0RECTOTSTCK - Receipt Quantity Total Stock
0RECVALSTCK - Quantity Received into Valuated Stock
Thanks.

Rotating object sampling quality issues

A student of mine asked this question today. Rotating sharp-edged artwork seems to be problematic in Photoshop.
Take this grid:
Original file (6 colours):
www.estructor.biz/testje/grid2.png
Now rotate by 45 degrees.
These are the results in Photoshop CS6 labeled by sampling method:
www.estructor.biz/testje/ps_grid.png
And these are the results in Photoline (latest beta introduced improved two new sampling algorithms):
www.estructor.biz/testje/pl_grid.png
I uploaded the raw png files to my own server, otherwise the quality may be affected by the upload function here.
To compare both, open them in Photoshop and zoom to 200% or 400%, and notice how Photoshop's versions do not compare favourably: some sort of unsharp mask sharpening effect was introduced, resulting in halos.
The CatmullRom version generated in Photoline seems to be the best one, though the ones with MitchellNetravali, Lanczos3 and even bicubic all arguably produced better anti-aliased versions than the ones in Photoshop. In Photoshop only Bicubic Smooth is acceptable (in my opinion), though the anti-aliasing is too smooth looking.
I am aware the effects can be subtle - though they are quite noticeable. I mean, why does Photoshop's bicubic sampling prodube such an inferior version compared to Photoline? It makes no sense.
A secondary observation I made is that Photoshop's version introduced 2271 colours into the rotated version, while Photoline only used 231 unique colours after transformation. Which, with Photoline's version being the superior one, exacerbates the problem in my view, because it will add to the final artwork's file size (may be very important for both web graphics and 2d game graphics).
From a user experience view point, another issue is that Photoshop CS6 will not render the final result as a preview before the actual transformation is applied - meaning the user is left to first apply the transformation, and then she/he is forced to undo, and redo until satisfied. In Photoline, for example, the transformation's sampling method can be changed and the actual result is shown before committing to a sampling method.
All this is not that important to me for my own personal work, because I switched to Photoline and other software more than a year ago. However, I do still want to be able to answer questions from students in regards to Photoshop, so I feel it is an important aspect.
So, my (and my students') questions are:
- is it possible to turn off that unsharp mask-like effect when rotating?
- are there ways to improve the sampling somehow?
- down-sampling sharp artwork also introduces similar problems. Any way to circumvent them?
- placing the grid/dragging the grid file into a photoshop file produces a terrible result. Only by opening the grid file first, and copying and pasting is the original artwork preserved. Drag and drop does not function properly (and refuses to place at 100% automatically). Any solutions to change the drag and drop behaviour to automatically resample?
(btw, this does not happen in Photoline either - drag and drop does not (and should not!) resample in this case!)
- have these issues been resolved in Photoshop CC latest version?
- if the current versions of CS6 or CC do not offer solutions for this type of work, is this something that will be fixed in an upcoming release? Or is it not at all on the radar?
Thanks.
ps As mentioned before in the Illustrator forum, exporting sharp artwork from Illustrator at low screen resolutions is by far the lesser of a viable option - the anti-aliasing is absolutely horrid, unless the artwork is directly imported into Photoshop and severely blown up, and then scaled down. And even then the results are not on par with Mitchel-Netravali and Catmul Rom.

@Steve: thanks, but I am quite experienced, and I did not import the vector itself, but a straightforward bitmap grid to avoid any interpolation while importing and converting the vector graphic itself. Also see the first paragraph in my response to Mike below .
@Mike: importing the grid as a smart illustrator object does indeed help - but the lines are too thick and dark looking compared to Mitchell-Netravali and Catmull-Rom.
Exporting your screen sized artwork from Illustrator using the save for web option is positively the worst option: the quality is unacceptable in most cases. I've done a small write up concerning the bad anti-aliasing as a result of Illustrator's web export here:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/6002543#6002543
The only workable solution to get the best anti-aliased down-scaled artwork from Illustrator is to blow up the artwork to a large size, then rasterize, and scale down again. Even then the final quality as a result of the built-in sampling algorithms of Photoshop will not be on par with Photoline or ImageMagick.
And, of course, not always is a vector version available. The screen artwork I receive is often bitmap based, which proves to be problematic for transformation jobs in Photoshop.
Gif is merely 8bit indexed, and would not solve the issue - reducing the number of colours is no solution for poor anti-aliasing along edges.
@Chris: I am unsure how you can say that - yes, Catmull-Rom is known to be a less than ideal re-sampling method for up-scaling images. That said, it works wonderfully well for down-sampling images or as a sampling method to transform lower resolution bitmap based artwork - essential for screen based work and web jobs.
Lanczos does a meagre job for down-sampling (with Lanczos8 especially bad in terms of artifacts), but a very good job for up-sampling images. We have to know the goal to identify the best method/approach/solution.
Although I am certain you are familiar with the math, the example shown on this page demonstrates that Catmull-Rom and Mitchell-Netravali do in fact work best for down-sampling images: http://pixinsight.com/doc/docs/InterpolationAlgorithms/InterpolationAlgorithms.html
And I am not inventing all this - for lower resolution sharp edged illustrative artwork Photoshop has always been rather awkward. The sampling methods currently implemented in Photoshop deal very well with high resolution artwork and photographic media, but fare poorly with lower resolution graphics.
The demonstration files I prepared earlier and linked in my original question show unequivocally that Photoshop's current sampling algorithms deal poorly in this regard! I did not even bother to include Bicubic Automatic, because that looked positively awful.
I do understand why that is - traditionally it has never been Photoshop's focus I think. Looking at the bare-bones results, though, I am inclined to conclude that both Mitchell-Netravali and Catmull-Rom do indeed produce superior results for down-sampling and re-sampling during transformations of lower resolution images - both sharp-edged artwork, as well as photos.
This has been my experience for years now dealing with 2d game graphics, web work, and general screen graphics work. It is one of the reasons why I left Photoshop and Illustrator early on for this type of work.
So it eludes me why these are not available in Photoshop. Because as far as the results are concerned, they seem to be quite good enough to ship.

Smart Object Anti-Aliasing issues in PS CS5

I am having a heck of a time working with smart objects that contain transparency in CS5. Here is an example of what I'm experiencing:
1,700px smart object scaled down to 156px. No transparency in SO. Good anti-aliasing.
Same smart object, but with a layer mask or transparency in the smart object. But alas: horrible anti-aliasing, throughout the entire image.
I frequently embed my transparency within the SOs I work with, due to the limitations of linking embedded SOs with layer masks etc. I experienced no problems in CS3. I'm thinking this is a bug? Does anyone have any insight? Thanks!
UPDATE: after performing many tests, and noticing that having transparency in a smart object does not necessarily lead to poor anti-aliasing in the parent image, I have narrowed-down the issue. The issue will occur only if at least an antire column or row of pixels (of any height/width) along the border of the image are transparent. It does not matter if the transparency is at the top, bottom, sides, or surrounding the image, but it must take up some amount of an entire side. This is looking more and more like a bug... Is anyone able to replicate the issue? (Adobe engineers?) Thanks.

Here is the file I'm seeing this in. Incidentally, if I drag the problematic smart object to another open image, the appearance is the same (Photoshop is, after all, the epitome of wysiwyg software). But this works both ways: I can also re-create the smart object in another document without the poor anti-aliasing, then drag it into the original image and it will still look fine. (in this file there are two side-by-side, so that you can compare the two. you can also play with the smart object on the left to see the anti-aliasing go from good to bad; just go into the SO and delete a row or column of pixels from the border and re-save).
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8162462/SO-aa-issue%3F.tif
(i used Dropbox; lmk if there's a better way to post a file in this forum)
Since I just started using CS5 (from CS3), I have suspicions that it may be a version translation issue (either in the TIFF or smart object). Either way, I'm glad that this is not a common or easily-reproduced issue. Let me know if you learn anything from the file
Thanks,
Cory

Value of inventory after Goods Issue, before Goods Receipt for open order

Dear Experts,
Raw materials R72 and R82 are required to produce Semifinished Product S10.
Semifinished product S10 is required to produce Fnished product F20
On 10th August 2011, I created and release a Process Order for material S10 copying component materials R72 and R82.. Goods issue for component materials R72 and R82 were done for this process order using tcode MIGO (mvt type 261).
It takes four to five days to properly blend components R72 and R82 to obtain S10.
It means Goods Receipt for this process order will be done on 14th or 15th August when this blending has been completed.
Management suddenly issues a directive that stock take should be carried out in the plant on the 12th August 2011, and my process order is still open and cannot be closed ( or goods receipt cannot be done) because blending is yet to be completed.
Please how do I take care of this scenario/situation since Goods Issue has been done already?
How will the Accountants see or get the correct value of inventory?

When I run WIP Calculation for my Process Order, what will be the effect ? I mean what accouts are updated by WIP Calculation within a period (not across a perion or at period end)?
GI values issued to the Process order will come into WIP GL .( Since your client want to know the stock take should be carried out in the plant on the 12th August 2011- we are doing WIP calculation)
> After this WIP Calculation is run, and say about 2days later, Goods Receipt for this process order is to be posted, what steps am I suppose to carry out?
After GR Made, Run a WIP calculation again for the order so that The WIP from the GL account will get reduced ,now WIP= (GI value + confirmation ) -(GR Value),
Check in DEV system before doing in PRD,
On Month end, do the variance calculation and do the settlement

Order Confirmation Without Doing Goods Issue & No Goods Receipt W/o Confirm

Hi,
I am facing a problem at client site & i need a quick response from you people.
If i am not doing GOODS ISSUE to a Production Order the system is allowing me to do Confirmation for that Production order & also the system is allowing me to do GOODS RECEIPT for that Order before doing complete Confirmation.
My client wants that Without doing Goods Issue it should not allow order confirmation & also No Goods receipt without doing Final confirmation. Please help me regarding this configuration, How to do it. If it is possible then please help me& tell how to do it.
I am in final stage of my project.Please i want a quick response.
regards
Jimmy

Hi Ashish,
you need to create new thread anyway
for process industry you need to use CONFPI 02 you can put this in SMOD and go to display in that you can see component when you click that you can find functional module : EXIT_SAPLCORF_402 click in that you can see include in which you need to modify
take help of ABAP and do some modify to this module
Thanks
Bala

Automatic Goods Issue for Goods Receipt (Purchase Order).

Hi,
Experts - I have some newbee problem.
I have to create ZMIGO to behave like follows:
1. User enters all necessary data (like in MIGO) and posts document.
2. System creates automatic Goods Issue document based on data entered in 1. (above).
I doubt full automatic posting of GI will be possible (user has to fill in WBS for GI and possibly change "GI for project"). So my idea is to redirect user from ZMIGO (after posting) GR document to MIGO_GI and pass all necessary parameters. And thats my question: How to do it? Is it possible? Any other ideas? Maybe examples???
Will reward points to all helpful answers.
Regs,
FS

Hi,
I've created implementation for MB_DOCUMENT_BADI in se19 (named it: ZMB_DOCUMENT_BADI_1). Filled methods with code and put some break-points. Activiated methods and implementation.
When I post documents via MIGO this BADI is not executed! Why? When I've searched program SAPLMIGO for cl_exithandler only two were found: MB_MIGO_BADI and MB_MIGO_ITEM_BADI. What I have to do to activate this MB_DOCUMENT_BADI???
Points waiting for helpful answers.
REgs,
FS

Issue in goods receipt

Daear All,
while doing goods receipt getting the error message : Acct. 200510 for trans./event key BSX, postable directly.
the same in goods issue also.
please help me on this.
Best Regards,
Venkat.

The tick mark is already is there.
By,
Venkat.

Issue Finished Goods

Hi All,
For few finished goods we have not entered stock in our opening balance since we didnt ahev any stock for them.
now the customer has returned some FG item which we have taken as sales return item. while trying to issue these items in the Bill of material of other items we get an error " Item cost not found"
wht could be the reason.

Hi Prince......
It seems you don't have put Item Cost while Entering Opening Stock.
Please make sure of this. Else you may have to do inventory Revaluation of these Items......
Regards,
Rahul

Object id of Issue of goods CFL

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for