Obsolete statements in ecc and higher

can anybody tell me about the obsolete statements that are caught by transaction code uccheck(such as open data set,concordinate,translate)function modules ws_upload ws_download)

Hi,
Check these links,
Hope this helps,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/fc/eb33cc358411d1829f0000e829fbfe/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/fc/eb3294358411d1829f0000e829fbfe/content.htm
Regards,
Pritha.
Reward points if helpful.

Similar Messages

Obsolete statements in ECC with respect to 4.5b

Hi Gurus,
This is really very urgent.i need an information on Obsolete Statements in ECC 6.0 with respect to 4.5B R/3 Version.please help me..
Full marks would be rewarded 100%
regards
Sahil

Hi
check the table PRGN_CORR2 which gives the list of transactions that were changed from different versions from 3.1G to 4.70 and also above versions
Pls check this
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5ac31178-0701-0010-469a-b4d7fa2721ca
Reward if useful
Regards
Raghav T

How to query and revoke Statements Auditing (11g and higher)

HI,
When I choose the OS/XML Standard Auditing:
1) Which views allow me to see what statement auditing have been created?
For instance: audit all on scott.emp by access.
2) How to revoke a statement auditing like: audit all on scott by access?
Thanks and Regards.

I don't understand... have you tried it?
07:14:57 SQL> select * from user_obj_audit_opts;
no rows selected
Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
07:14:58 SQL> audit all on junk by access;
Audit succeeded.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
07:15:12 SQL> select * from user_obj_audit_opts;
OBJECT_NAME                    OBJECT_TYPE             ALT       AUD       COM       DEL       GRA       IND       INS       LOC       REN       SEL       UPD       REF EXE       CRE       REA
WRI       FBK
JUNK                           TABLE                   A/A       A/A       A/A       A/A       A/A       A/A       A/A       A/A       A/A       A/A       A/A       -/- -/-       -/-       -/-
-/-       A/A
1 row selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.12
07:16:46 SQL> noaudit all on junk;
Noaudit succeeded.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.03
07:16:56 SQL> select * from user_obj_audit_opts;
no rows selected
Elapsed: 00:00:00.02
07:17:03 SQL>
'ALL' is a shortcut for naming all of the relevant options: ALTER, SELECT, DELETE, etc.

REG: Obsolete statements in SLIN ecc 5.0

Hi all,
When i am executing the ABAP EPC for obsolete statements.(with Also display Hidden Messages)
I get the 2 Obsolete statements and as following :
 Program: ZXXXXX Row: 652
The current ABAP command is obsolete and problematic, especially so in ABAP
Objects
An explicit work area is necessary in the OO context. Use "APPEND wa TO S_WERKS
[SORTED BY]".
(The message can be hidden with "#EC *)
Program: ZXXXXX Row: 2558
The current ABAP command is obsolete and problematic, especially so in ABAP
Objects
At "LOOP AT itab", one of the additions "INTO", "ASSIGNING", or "TRANSPORTING NO
FIELDS" is required. in the OO context.
(The message can be hidden with "#EC *)
Though i put the "#EC after above variable still i can see it in the SLIN overview.
Pls help me to hide these Obsolete statements.
Thanks and Regards
Srikanth.P

Lest you find yourself labelled as "out of date" or "obsolete", perhaps you could spend a little time to bring your coding practices up to the state of the product. A LOT of things used in ABAP within my 12 years are now obsolete. For instance, the "Official ABAP Programming Guidelines" by SAP Press, written by Drs. Thummel and Keller, describes FORM....ENDFORM and REFRESH as obsolete.
In current versions, we loop at ...assgining <Field-symbol> or into structure....
We do read table into structure or assigning <field-symbol> or (where possible) transporting no fields.
We don't have tables with header rows, since those can't be used in OO.
We don't use REFRESH, we use CLEAR tabname[].
In OO, we use the SoC, software layering concepts, with GUI, Application and Persistence level Class definitions and implementations.
We used class-based exception handling where possible to avoid abends which are, of course, detrimental to our users' experiences.
etc.

Replacement for Obsolete Payroll schemas 'KARMC' and 'XEDT' in ECC 6.0

Hi Experts,
I am working in a upgradation project. In HR Module (Payroll schema). Any one can help me out what are the replacement for obsolete payroll schemas 'KARMC' and 'XEDT' in ECC 6.0. (These two are there in 4.6C but, not in ECC 6.0)
Thanks in Advance,
Ramesh.

Hi Experts,
I am working in a upgradation project. In HR Module (Payroll schema). Any one can help me out what are the replacement for obsolete payroll schemas 'KARMC' and 'XEDT' in ECC 6.0. (These two are there in 4.6C but, not in ECC 6.0)
Thanks in Advance,
Ramesh.

Better replacement for Obsolete statement

Hi ,
During upgradation to ECC 6.0 , at many places in order to correct the Unicode error we need to use the Move statement. Since the Move-Corresponding is an obsolete statement now , so we can't use it any more. It is very difficult and highly time consuming to move huge structures and internal tables field by field . Is there any alternative to this ?

Move-Corresponding is an obsolete statement now
Who said ????
at many places in order to correct the Unicode error we need to use the Move statement
What type of error ?

Replacement of SEARCH ITAB statement in ECC 6.0

Hello Experts,
Can anybody tell me, which statement i can use to replace an obsolete statement i.e. SEARCH ITAB in ECC 6.0?
Thanks in advance!!
Best Regards,
Bhupinder

Hello,
While using FIND statement, i am getting bellow syntax error
As line type of the table "ITAB" in the CHAR MODE a indication-like and/or in the BYTE MODE a byte-like field was expected.
My statement is
FIND FIRST OCCURRENCE OF 'WHERE'
IN TABLE ITAB
What should i do to resolve this sytax error?
Best Regards,
Bhupinder

Regarding types statement in ECC 6.0...plz reply..urgent

Hi,
I am copying a program which is in 4.7 to ECC 6.0,i am facing error regarding structures with types...
The following code in 4.7
DATA:BEGIN OF W_BMM00.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE BMM00.
DATA:END OF W_BMM00.
DATA:BEGIN OF W_BMMH1.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE BMMH1.
DATA:END OF W_BMMH1.
DATA:BEGIN OF W_BMMH7.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE BMMH7.
DATA:END OF W_BMMH7.
DATA : BEGIN OF TAB_TLINE OCCURS 0.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE TLINE.
DATA : END OF TAB_TLINE.
i have written the same in ECC6.0 as below
TYPES:BEGIN OF tw_bmm00.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE bmm00.
TYPES:END OF tw_bmm00 ,
 tt_bmm00 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF tw_bmm00.
TYPES:BEGIN OF tw_bmmh1.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE bmmh1.
TYPES:END OF tw_bmmh1 ,
 tt_bmmh1 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF tw_bmmh1.
TYPES:BEGIN OF tw_bmmh7.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE bmmh7.
TYPES:END OF tw_bmmh7 ,
 tt_bmmh7 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF tw_bmmh7.
TYPES:BEGIN OF tw_TAB_TLINE.
 INCLUDE STRUCTURE TLINE.
TYPES:END OF tw_TAB_TLINE,
 tt_tab_tline TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF tw_tab_tline.
lw_bmm00 TYPE tw_bmm00,
 lt_bmm00 TYPE tt_bmm00,
 lw_bmmh1 TYPE tw_bmmh1,
 lt_bmmh1 TYPE tt_bmmh1,
 lw_bmmh7 TYPE tw_bmmh7,
 lt_bmmh7 TYPE tt_bmmh7,
 lw_tab_thead TYPE tw_tab_thead,
 lt_tab_thead TYPE tt_tab_thead,....
when i check SLIN errors i am getting the following errors...plz resolve..
The current ABAP command is obsolete
Within classes and interfaces, you can only use "TYPE" to refer to ABAP Dictionary
types (not "LIKE" or "STRUCTURE").


include strture not allowed.
rules.
ABAP Development under Unicode
Prior to Unicode the length of a character was exactly one byte, allowing implicit typecasts or memory-layout oriented programming. With Unicode this situation has changed: One character is no longer one byte, so that additional specifications have to be added to define the unit of measure for implicit or explicit references to (the length of) characters.
Character-like data in ABAP are always represented with the UTF-16 - standard (also used in Java or other development tools like Microsoft's Visual Basic); but this format is not related to the encoding of the underlying database.
A Unicode-enabled ABAP program (UP) is a program in which all Unicode checks are effective. Such a program returns the same results in a non-Unicode system (NUS) as in a Unicode system (US). In order to perform the relevant syntax checks, you must activate the Unicode flag in the screens of the program and class attributes.
In a US, you can only execute programs for which the Unicode flag is set. In future, the Unicode flag must be set for all SAP programs to enable them to run on a US. If the Unicode flag is set for a program, the syntax is checked and the program executed according to the rules described in this document, regardless of whether the system is a US or a NUS. From now on, the Unicode flag must be set for all new programs and classes that are created.
If the Unicode flag is not set, a program can only be executed in an NUS. The syntactical and semantic changes described below do not apply to such programs. However, you can use all language extensions that have been introduced in the process of the conversion to Unicode.
As a result of the modifications and restrictions associated with the Unicode flag, programs are executed in both Unicode and non-Unicode systems with the same semantics to a large degree. In rare cases, however, differences may occur. Programs that are designed to run on both systems therefore need to be tested on both platforms.
Other Changes
1. Bit Statements
2. Adding Field Sequences
3. Loops with VARY and VARYING
4. Creating Subroutines
5. Saving Programs
6. Assigning Types for GET/SET PARAMETER
7. Unreachable Statements
8. Function Modules with Incorrect Parameter Names
1. Bit Statements
Previously, the system checked for the bit statements SET BIT i OF f [TO g] and GET BIT i OF f [INTO g]whether the field f is character-type; X fields, X strings, and flat structures are usually regarded as character-type. For Unicode programs this is no longer useful, because the types X and XSTRING no longer count as character-type and the bit by bit access to character-type fields or structures is no longer platform-independent. Therefore, with these operations in Unicode programs, the field f must be type X or XSTRING.
For the bit mask operations f O x, f Z x, and f M x you could previously use all number-type and hence all character-type types for the left operand f. In Unicode programs, the f operand must now be type X or XSTRING.
2. Adding Field Sequences
When adding field sequences, restrictions apply to the following statements in Unicode:
ADD n1 THEN n2 UNTIL nz [ ACCORDING TO sel ] GIVING m ...
ADD n1 THEN n2 UNTIL nz TO m [ RANGE str ].
1. The operands n1, n2, and nz must be type-compatible with one another.
2. The distance between nz and n1 must be an integral multiple of the distance between n2 and n1.
3. A syntax or runtime error occurs if the fields n1, n2, and nz are not in a structure. This structure must be recognizable statically or its valid area must be marked explicitly using the RANGE addition.
4. At runtime, the system ensures that the RANGE area is not left.
ADD n1 FROM i1 GIVING m [ RANGE str ].
1. Field n1 must be within the structure. The structure must be explicitly defined using the RANGE addition if it is not recognizable statically.
2. For this variant, the system also checks at runtime whether n1 and the addressed values are within the structure.
3. Loops
Loops with the VARY or VARYING addition are also problematic in Unicode, since a type-a access to memory contents cannot be ensured and memory can be overwritten inadvertently.
DO ... VARYING f FROM f1 NEXT f2.
For this statement, the fields f, f1, and f2 must be type-compatible with each other. To prevent memory contents being overwritten, a RANGE for valid accesses is introduced implicitly or explicitly for the following statements:
DO ... TIMES VARYING f FROM f1 NEXT f2 [ RANGE f3 ].
WHILE ... VARY f FROM f1 NEXT f2 [ RANGE f3 ].
A syntax or runtime error is caused if f1 or f2 are not included in f3. If the RANGE addition is missing, it is defined implicitly from FROM f1 NEXT f2 as follows:
1. If both f1 and f2 are statically recognizable components of the same structure, the valid RANGE area is defined from the smallest structure that comprises f1 and f2.
2. A syntax error is triggered if it is recognizable statically that f1 and f2 are not part of the same structure.
3. A valid area must be defined explicitly using the RANGE addition if the connection between f1 and f2 is not recognizable statically.
If you specify a deep structure as the RANGE addition, the system checks for every loop pass that there are no field references, object references, tables, or strings in the area read.
4. Creating Subroutines
When automatically generating subroutines using the statement GENERATE SUBROUTINE POOL itab NAME name, the generated program inherits the content of the Unicode flag of the generating program.
5. Saving Programs
When automatically generating programs using the statement INSERT REPORT prog FROM itab, default values are set for the TRDIR entry as before. Amongst other things, this statement has the new addition UNICODE ENABLING uc, with which the Unicode flag of the inserted report receives the value of uc. If this addition is missing, the following applies:
1. A Unicode program creates a Unicode program.
2. A non-Unicode program in turn creates a non-Unicode program.
3. A non-Unicode program becomes a Unicode program if it is overwritten by a Unicode program.
4. A Unicode program remains a Unicode program if it is overwritten by a non-Unicode program.
6. Assigning Types for GET/SET PARAMETER
For the statements GET PARAMETER ID pid FIELD f and GET PARAMETER ID pid FIELD f, f must be character-type. You can use the EXPORT and IMPORT statements for storing non-character-type fields and structures.
7. Unreachable Statements
In Unicode programs, unreachable statements cause a syntax error. In non-Unicode programs, there was previously only a syntax warning.
8. Function Modules with Incorrect Parameter Names
In Unicode programs, calling a function module, whose parameter names are specified statically as a literal or constant, causes an exception that can be handled if an incorrect parameter name was specified. This only applies to function modules that are not called via Remote Function Call. In non-Unicode programs, an incorrect name was previously ignored.
http://service.sap.com/instguides
--> SAP Business Suite Applications
--> SAP ERP
--> mySAP ERP 2005
--> Upgrade
--> Upgrade Documentation - mySAP ERP 2005 SR2
There choose your database and operating system.
If you're looking for functional details check
http://service.sap.com/releasenotes

Replace the obsolete statement STOP

Hi expert ,
I am working for a upgrade project fron 4.7 to ECC. We need to replace the obsolete statement STOP. Which is the best statement to replace STOP(RETURN or EXIT)
Thanks and Regards
Joby Jacob

HI STOP leaves the current event block and trigger END-OF-SELECTION.
SAP recommend using EXIT only within loops (see EXIT - loops ). Instead, use RETURN to leave processing blocks.
So RETURN seems to be better option.
Edited by: Anurag_n on Apr 14, 2010 8:31 AM

Sun C 5.9 optimization issue (-xO3 and higher)?

It looks like the C compiler is sometimes a bit too enthusiastic about removing obsolete code at optimization level -xO3 and higher (32-bit memory model).
I would expect the following piece of code to break from the loop after 137 iterations, exploiting the integer overflow and 'wrarp-around' of time_now.
This happens only up to and including optimization level 2.
It looks like at -xO3 and higher, the compiler thinks that since time_now starts at a positive value and is always incremented with a positive value,
the if statement with the break can be optimized away.
#include <stdio.h>
#define SECONDS_PER_DAY 86400
#define APPROX_SECONDS_PER_HALFYEAR 15768000
#define NR_HALF_YEARS 1280
void
main(int argc, char *argv[])
register int i;
long time_now;
for (i=0, time_now=2*SECONDS_PER_DAY; i < NR_HALF_YEARS; ++i, time_now+=APPROX_SECONDS_PER_HALFYEAR){
if (time_now < 0){ /* passed 2037 ... */
break;
fprintf(stderr, "%d %ld\n", i, time_now);
}

The optimizer is not too enthusiastic. The program depends on behavior that is undefined by the C standard.
The C standard does not define the results of signed integer overflow. (Unsigned integer wrap-around is required.) Signed integer overflow can wrap around as you expect, could generate a trap, or possibly have some other behavior. Programs that depend on a particular result are not portable.
The optimizer, particularly at high optimization levels, takes advantage of undefined or unspecified behavior to produce faster code. Unportable programs can display different behavior at different optimization levels, just as they can display different behavior using different compilers.

Mixing ECC and NECC (Non-ECC) RAM Modules

Hi,
I have a G5 Dual Core 2.0 with a pair of 512Mb Non-ECC (NECC) RAM installed and I want to upgrade to 3Gb. I'm thinking of getting 2Gb ECC modules and discarding the 1Mb NECC installed. But I came across a phrase in the Apple Manual of my G5 that states "DO NOT MIX ECC and NON-ECC Memory Modules WITHIN A PAIR." Does that mean I can mix ECC and NECC within Memory Banks and NOT within a PAIR? Because in that case I won't have to discard my NECC 1Gb and have a mixed 3Gb Memory!? I'm afraid to actually try it so I would appreciate your insights. Thanks much.
G5 Dual Core 2.0 Mac OS X (10.4.7)

Yes. You can mix ECC and nonECC as long as you don't pair the ECC with the nonECC. The computer will just treat all RAM as nonECC.
You can keep the original memory as long as the two 512MB DIMMs are always paired with each other.

Extremely slow and high latency all day.

DSL is running extremely slow during peak hours from 12 afternoon to 12 midnight. Lower than 50% of rated speed and high latency
I have been frustrated with this DSL Service for months now. I am considering contacting BBB to file a complaint and I am tired of dealing with customer service giving me the run around. Internet is a monopoly in my area therefore verizon feels it doesn't have to do anything to keep its customers when they provide crappy service. I am on waitlist for another internet service provider and it is going to take almost a year because of how bad the internet options are in the area and demand for better options. I even had to pay over 100 dollars to get a truck roll come to my house to fix any issues within the house and the internet has not gotten better. Atleast I feel I should get a refund or something.
Here is my speedtest result just now. http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/2899553407
It has been even slower at other times. http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/2893509440
Modem is Westell 6100 or something.
Transceiver Statistics
Transceiver Revision:
7.2.3.0
Vendor ID Code:
4
Line Mode:
G.DMT Mode
Data Path:
Interleaved
Transceiver Information
Downstream Path
Upstream Path
DSL Speed (Kbits/Sec)
3360
864
Margin (dB)
15.5
13.0
Line Attenuation (dB)
21.5
13.0
Transmit Power (dBm)
7.6
11.9
Giganews line info
news.giganews.com
traceroute to {edited for privacy}, 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 gw1-g-vlan201.dca.giganews.com (216.196.98.4) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms
2 ash-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.70.241) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms
3 TenGigE0-2-0-0.GW1.IAD8.ALTER.NET (63.125.125.41) 3 ms GigabitEthernet2-0-0.GW8.IAD8.ALTER.NET (63.65.76.189) 3 ms TenGigE0-2-0-0.GW1.IAD8.ALTER.NET (63.125.125.41) 3 ms
4 P1-8-0-0.LSANCA-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net (130.81.151.237) 72 ms 72 ms 72 ms
5 P9-3.LSANCA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.193.123) 75 ms P8-0.LSANCA-DSL-44.verizon-gni.net (130.81.35.133) 75 ms 76 ms
6 * * *
7 * * *
8 * * *
9 * * *
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 * * *
13 * * *
14 * * *
15 * * *
16 * * Max number of unresponsive hops reached (firewall or filter?)
news-europe.giganews.com
traceroute to {edited for privacy}, 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 vl201.gw1.ams.giganews.com (216.196.110.3) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms
2 te7-8.ccr01.ams05.atlas.cogentco.com (149.11.104.17) 0 ms te7-7.ccr01.ams05.atlas.cogentco.com (149.11.104.9) 0 ms te7-8.ccr01.ams05.atlas.cogentco.com (149.11.104.17) 0 ms
3 te0-7-0-16.ccr21.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.72.42) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms
4 te0-3-0-0.ccr21.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.48.141) 8 ms 8 ms te0-2-0-0.ccr21.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.28.158) 8 ms
5 te0-7-0-4.ccr21.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.84.125) 90 ms te0-0-0-4.ccr21.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.84.129) 90 ms *
6 te0-3-0-6.ccr21.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.41.5) 96 ms te0-0-0-2.ccr21.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.25.238) 96 ms te0-2-0-7.ccr21.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.41.1) 96 ms
7 be2042.ccr21.iad02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.26.126) 97 ms 97 ms 97 ms
8 uunet.iad01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.13.138) 99 ms verizon.iad01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.10.226) 105 ms 105 ms
9 P0-8-0-0.LSANCA-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net (130.81.29.127) 177 ms 178 ms P1-0-0-0.LSANCA-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net (130.81.199.39) 174 ms
10 P8-0.LSANCA-DSL-44.verizon-gni.net (130.81.35.133) 175 ms P9-3.LSANCA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.193.109) 187 ms 182 ms
11 * * *
12 * * *
13 * * *
14 * * *
15 * * *
16 * * *
17 * * *
18 * * *
19 * * *
20 * * *
21 * Max number of unresponsive hops reached (firewall or filter?)
Here is what ICSI Netalyzer Results have stated.
Network Access Link Properties + –
Network performance (?): Latency: 580 ms, Loss: 15.5% –
The round-trip time (RTT) between your computer and our server is 580 ms, which is somewhat high. This may be due to a variety of factors, including distance between your computer and our server, a slow network link, or other network traffic.
We recorded a packet loss of 16%. This loss is very significant and will lead to serious performance problems. It could be due either to very high load on our servers due to a large number of visitors, or problems in your network. Of the packet loss, at least 14.0% of the packets appear to have been lost on the path from your computer to our servers.
TCP connection setup latency (?): 720ms –
The time it takes for your computer to set up a TCP connection with our server is 720 ms, which is quite high. This may be due to a variety of factors, including a significant distance between your computer and our server, a particularly slow or poor network link, or problems in your network.
Background measurement of network health (?): 3 transient outages, longest: 0.8 seconds –
During most of Netalyzr's execution, the client continuously measures the state of the network in the background, looking for short outages. During testing, the client observed 3 such outages. The longest outage lasted for 0.8 seconds. This suggests a general problem with the network where connectivity is intermittent. This loss might also cause some of Netalyzr's other tests to produce incorrect results.
Network bandwidth (?): Upload 700 Kbit/s, Download 2.3 Mbit/s +
Network buffer measurements (?): Uplink 5400 ms, Downlink 1200 ms –
We estimate your uplink as having 5400 ms of buffering. This is quite high, and you may experience substantial disruption to your network performance when performing interactive tasks such as web-surfing while simultaneously conducting large uploads. With such a buffer, real-time applications such as games or audio chat can work quite poorly when conducting large uploads at the same time.
We estimate your downlink as having 1200 ms of buffering. This is quite high, and you may experience substantial disruption to your network performance when performing interactive tasks such as web-surfing while simultaneously conducting large downloads. With such a buffer, real-time applications such as games or audio chat can work quite poorly when conducting large downloads at the same time.
HTTP Tests + –
Address-based HTTP proxy detection (?): OK +
Content-based HTTP proxy detection (?): OK +
HTTP proxy detection via malformed requests (?): OK +
Filetype-based filtering (?): OK +
HTTP caching behavior (?): OK +
JavaScript-based tests (?): OK +
DNS Tests + –
Restricted domain DNS lookup (?): OK +
Unrestricted domain DNS lookup (?): OK +
DNS resolver address (?): OK +
DNS resolver properties (?): Lookup latency 520 ms +
Direct probing of DNS resolvers (?): +
DNS glue policy (?): OK +
DNS resolver port randomization (?): OK +
DNS lookups of popular domains (?): OK +
DNS external proxy (?): OK +
DNS results wildcarding (?): Warning –
Your ISP's DNS server returns IP addresses even for domain names which should not resolve. Instead of an error, the DNS server returns an address of 199.101.28.20, which resolves to search.dnsassist.verizon.net. You can inspect the resulting HTML content here.
There are several possible explanations for this behavior. The most likely cause is that the ISP is attempting to profit from customer's typos by presenting advertisements in response to bad requests, but it could also be due to an error or misconfiguration in the DNS server.
The big problem with this behavior is that it can potentially break any network application which relies on DNS properly returning an error when a name does not exist.
The following lists your DNS server's behavior in more detail.
Please help. I am so frustrated I literally have fights with my family over internet problems. I am right now looking for other options and even starting to think about paying over 100 a month for dedicated line or T1 if they can service my area.

Not a single response from Verizon on this? And after you posted the tests & information they will need? I think I may have to make a service choice soon. Its bad enough Verizon can't post a simple email address for our support, they have removed Usenet access, removed access to our websites (I use HTML so their sitebuilder is useless)... Sheeshe...

ABAP Objects - Obsolete Statements

How to get the list of obsolete statements in ABAP Objects?
Moderator message: please search for available information/documentation before asking.
locked by: Thomas Zloch on Oct 6, 2010 1:08 PM

hi
Check table RODIR
and pass field name obselete ='X' and check data in table
it wil give all details..
it will help you out.
ankit
Moderator message: do not copy other peoples replies, whether in the same thread or not!
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Oct 6, 2010 1:09 PM

Education cess and Higher ed Cess is not appered in J1IIN

Hi;;
while creating excise invoice (J1IIN) Education cess and Higher ed Cess is not appered in J1IIN.
BED is coming properly in J1iin, even billing document (VF01) also posted properly with proper GL A/C.
i have done excise default setting in spro, even J1id also maintain.
or , any note apply? this is new implementation. version SAP ECC 6.0
kindly reply as soon as possible.
-Mangesh

Mangesh Dongre
Go to IMG-Logistic general-Tax on goods movement-India-Basic settings-determination of excise duties-condition based excise determination-click on classify condition types
--check whether your Education cess and Higher ed Cess condition type is assigned to the excise pricing procedure.
check in account determination
--specify excise accounts per excise transaction
--specify g/l accounts per excise transaction
Regards
Pradeep

Question about network statement in OSPF and BGP

The network statements in OSPF and BGP can be used to advertise networks. But I'm not clear under what circumstances would make more sense to use network statements to advertise a network than by using other methods to have the network learned by other routers.
Here is an example: assume I'm running BGP on router A. I want to advertise network 10.1.1.0/24 to other BGP peers. I have a OSPF route for this network. I can do 2 things: one is to use "network 10.1.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0", the other is to do "redistribute OSPF ... route-map OSPF-INTO-BGP", and create a prefix list to permit 10.1.1.0/24.
Both would work to have this network learned by other BGP peers. But which is better for what purpose?
Thanks a lot
Gary

Hi Gary,
There is one little difference between the use of the two approaches - the route injected into BGP by using a network statement will carry an Origin attribute of IGP, whereas the route injected using redistribution will have an Origin attribute of Incomplete. Now, that is not a huge issue since you can always change that whatever value you desire both with the use of the network statement and redistribution. The important thing, however, is that in the BGP best path selection process, the Origin attribute comparison is fairly high up and will prefer a route with the attribute of IGP.
Apart from that, there is absolutely no difference between using the network statement and using redistribution with a route-map that matches exactly on the same route that you would have specified with the network statement.
I guess one advantage of using the redistribute approach is that it does not clutter up the BGP config. If you wish to add more routes, you simply add them to the prefix list so that you don't really touch the BGP config portion at all..
Hope that helps - pls do remember to rate posts that help.
Paresh

Obsolete statements in ecc and higher

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for