Obtaining patchset 9.0.1.4 for bug 2144889

I need to get this patchset, have been all over the oracle website looking for it
can anybody help.
Thanks John

I need to get this patchset, have been all over the
oracle website looking for it
can anybody help.Have you checked metalink.oracle.com ?
Virag

Similar Messages

Solution for Bug 13412084: RESTRICT PAYMENT: IT SHOULD NOT ALLOW PAYMENT BE

http://attiqahmed.wordpress.com/2012/03/20/solution-for-bug-13412084-restrict-payment-it-should-not-allow-payment-before-invoice-accrual/

hello sir Octavio
Im sorry.. I failed to tell you that our encoder of invoices is separate from the one who entry for payments.
Therefore, the encoder uses the invoices batches[(N) Invoices>Entry>Invoice Batches] whereas the Paymaster(the one who entered payments?) uses the Payments [Payments>Entry>Payments]
By the way your suggestion did work to disable the Pay in Full checkbox.. but i decided to get rid of the actions button for the encoder.. and another person will be handling the validation and create accounting having such access.
So what i wanted is that the paymaster wouldn't be able see among the LOV of invoices at the Payments Form if its not created accounting.
I wanna make sure that all invoices are created accounting.
thank you so much for the understanding..:-)
Emgee

Error applying patch for bug 4554072 (APEX 2.2.1 requirement)

All,
I am installing APEX 2.2.1 and is trying to apply the patch for bug 4554072. I have checked the OWA version:
SQL> select owa_util.get_version from dual;
GET_VERSION
10.1.2.0.0
And When I am trying to execute the privht8.sql script I get the following errors:
SQL> @904x_1012x/privht8.sql
Warning: Package Body created with compilation errors.
Errors for PACKAGE BODY HTF:
LINE/COL ERROR
19/10 PLS-00323: subprogram or cursor 'TITLE' is declared in a package
specification and must be defined in the package body
21/10 PLS-00323: subprogram or cursor 'HTITLE' is declared in a package
specification and must be defined in the package body
35/7 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
35/15 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'TITLE' match this call
205/7 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
205/15 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'ANCHOR' match this call
433/7 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
LINE/COL ERROR
433/14 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'EM' match this call
443/7 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
443/14 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'KBD' match this call
829/7 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
829/14 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'TABLEDATA' match this call
834/7 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
834/14 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'TABLEDATA' match this call
836/7 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
836/14 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'TABLEDATA' match this call
840/8 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
840/15 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'TABLEDATA' match this call
LINE/COL ERROR
914/9 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
914/24 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'ESCAPE_SC' match this call
Warning: Package Body created with compilation errors.
Errors for PACKAGE BODY HTP:
LINE/COL ERROR
14/11 PLS-00323: subprogram or cursor 'TITLE' is declared in a package
specification and must be defined in the package body
15/11 PLS-00323: subprogram or cursor 'HTITLE' is declared in a package
specification and must be defined in the package body
1691/7 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
1691/7 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'PRINT' match this call
1694/7 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
1694/7 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'PRINT' match this call
1697/7 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
LINE/COL ERROR
1697/7 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'PRN' match this call
1700/7 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
1700/7 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'PRN' match this call
1703/7 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
1703/7 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'PRINT' match this call
1706/7 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
1706/7 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'PRINT' match this call
1709/7 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
1709/7 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'P' match this call
1712/7 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
1712/7 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'P' match this call
LINE/COL ERROR
1715/7 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
1715/7 PLS-00307: too many declarations of 'P' match this call
SQL>
Any ideas? I am hoping that I am just tired and is doing something really stooopid ;-)
Cheers,
Andy

Andy,
From the README.txt included with that patch:
- If the PL/SQL Web Toolkit version is either 9.0.4 series or 10.1.2 series and
the database version is higher than 8.1.7.4
SQL> @904x_1012x/privht.sql
SQL> exit
I’m assuming your database version is higher than 8.1.7.4. If so, then you need to run privht.sql and not privht8.sql.
Joel

How to obtain profit centers and cost centers for a particular GL account

Hi Gurus
Can you please suggest me a table or a function module to obtain profit centers and cost centers for a particular GL account.
Thanks in advance for help!
Regards
Ankit

Hi There, I have a simillar problem as above, however I would like a list of all G/L Accounts with profit centres and cost centres as well. Is this possible? Reason being that I have many unassigned cost centres and need to link them to profit centres.
Is there also a mass processing list to see which G/L accounts dont have primary elements assigned?
Regards,
Edited by: Luke Saloojee on Jul 29, 2008 8:12 AM

[svn:fx-3.x] 5709: Accepted BugQuash patch SDK-20278 for bug SDK-15690.

Revision: 5709
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-03-28 13:57:51 -0700 (Sat, 28 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
Accepted BugQuash patch SDK-20278 for bug SDK-15690. This makes it possible to initialize ToggleButtonBar with a selectedIndex of -1 so that no button is selected.
Thank you, Tom Chiverton!
QE Notes: None
Doc Notes: None
Bugs: SDK-15690
Reviewer: Accepting patch
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-20278
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15690
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15690
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/branches/3.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/ToggleButtonBar.as

[svn:fx-3.x] 5708: Accepted BugQuash patch SDK-20277 for bug SDK-17251.

Revision: 5708
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-03-28 13:30:11 -0700 (Sat, 28 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
Accepted BugQuash patch SDK-20277 for bug SDK-17251. This makes Form respect its children's includeInLayout property when computing measuredWidth.
Thank you, Myo Thein!
QE Notes: None
Doc Notes: None
Bugs: SDK-17251
Reviewer: Accepting patch
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-20277
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-17251
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-17251
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/branches/3.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/containers/Form.as

[svn] 2649: Committing Josh McDonald' s patch for bug SDK-15795 after review and testing.

Revision: 2649
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2008-07-29 09:33:23 -0700 (Tue, 29 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
Committing Josh McDonald's patch for bug SDK-15795 after review and testing. Various minOccurs and maxOccurs scenarios could lead to short circuit logic that would not release the schema stack scope if a reference was previously resolved.
Checkintests: Pass
BlazeDS 3.0.x webService flexunit tests: 100% Pass
BlazeDS 3.0.x webService mxunit tests: 100% Pass
QE: Yes, please review schema that is described in this bug and consider adding a test case. Note that I'm seeing intermittent failures on a few tests that pass when re-run (likely due to timeouts being too aggressive?).
Doc: No
Reviewer: Svetlin
Bugs:
SDK-15795 - minOccurs on breaks XMLEncoder
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15795
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15795
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/frameworks/projects/rpc/src/mx/rpc/xml/XMLEncoder.as

Hi.
Alot of good feedback. Personally I miss some keybindings, such as for branch switching.
Anyways, on the github corruption issue it seems like this was fixed in 0.8.4 according to http://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php?t=msg&th=183637& amp;start=0&S=81dfec74c1b979b21614f923fb09b1da

[svn] 2147: fix for bug SDK-14871:

Revision: 2147
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-06-19 09:12:19 -0700 (Thu, 19 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
fix for bug SDK-14871:
A few cases dealing with arrays of registered strongly typed AS objects run into this issue.
QA: please verify
Doc: n/a
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-14871
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/frameworks/projects/rpc/src/mx/rpc/xml/XMLDecoder.as

[svn] 2145: fix for Bug SDK-14927:

Revision: 2145
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-06-19 08:52:01 -0700 (Thu, 19 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
fix for Bug SDK-14927:
An empty SOAP-encoded array was being decoded incorrectly as an array with one (null) element.
QA: regressions run fine, but we should double-check that we are covering all similar edge cases
Doc: n/a
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-14927
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/frameworks/projects/rpc/src/mx/rpc/soap/types/SOAPArrayType.as

[svn:fx-i11] 5537: Fix for bug with FxRotate3D that Thermo ran into with our i11 build.

Revision: 5537
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-03-24 20:16:43 -0700 (Tue, 24 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
Fix for bug with FxRotate3D that Thermo ran into with our i11 build. The problem was that we were sometimes setting offsets values to NaN due to bad initialization, and that we were also incorrectly calculating the transform center when offsets had not yet been initialized on the target.
QE Notes: None
Doc Notes: None
Bugs: SDK-20209
Reviewer: Ely
tests: checkintests, mustella mx/effects
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-20209
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/branches/i11/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/mx/effects/FxAnimate3D.as
flex/sdk/branches/i11/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/AdvancedLayoutFeatures.as

We experience it as soon as we enable iCloud. Then an apple certificate is automatically added to the keychain and used for every https-access. Deleting the certificate com.apple.idms.appleid.prd... will do as a workaround but the certificate continues to be added to the keyChain from time to time or if you start over deactivating iCloud and then activate back.
Is this still a bug in Safari? Rosario

[svn:fx-trunk] 5473: Fix for bug around handling of constraints during and after effects were run , both for old and new effects.

Revision: 5473
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-03-20 16:02:58 -0700 (Fri, 20 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
Fix for bug around handling of constraints during and after effects were run, both for old and new effects. Fix was to correctly record and handle styles that were set or not set in either state and to temporarily set width/height values for the duration of an effect if we disabled the relevant styles that affect width/height.
QE Notes: None
Doc Notes: None
Bugs: SDK-17809
Reviewer: Jason
Testing: checkintests, Mustella Effects, ListDataEffects
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-17809
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/mx/effects/effectClasses/FxAnimateInstance.a s
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/effects/Effect.as

Revision: 5473
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-03-20 16:02:58 -0700 (Fri, 20 Mar 2009)
Log Message:
Fix for bug around handling of constraints during and after effects were run, both for old and new effects. Fix was to correctly record and handle styles that were set or not set in either state and to temporarily set width/height values for the duration of an effect if we disabled the relevant styles that affect width/height.
QE Notes: None
Doc Notes: None
Bugs: SDK-17809
Reviewer: Jason
Testing: checkintests, Mustella Effects, ListDataEffects
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-17809
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/mx/effects/effectClasses/FxAnimateInstance.a s
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/effects/Effect.as

Can I obtain a Camera Raw lens profile for my Fujifilm X100S?

Can I obtain a Camera Raw lens profile for my Fujifilm X100S?

The Fuji X100S uses built-in lens profile supplied in the raw files, themselves, so Adobe applies the profile automatically and it cannot be turned off.
There is no indication of the profile being applied in Lightroom but the recent versions of the Camera Raw plug-in for Photoshop will indicate that a built-in profile is being used:

[svn] 3233: Fix for bug related to see tag, [Exclude] metadata, and extra lines in mxml examples block.

Revision: 3233
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-09-16 12:57:29 -0700 (Tue, 16 Sep 2008)
Log Message:
Fix for bug related to see tag, [Exclude] metadata, and extra lines in mxml examples block.
Bugs: SDK-16886
QA: Yes
Doc:
Reviewed By: Pete F
Tests: checkintests
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16886
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/asdoc/TopLevelClassesGenerator.ja va

Remember that Arch Arm is a different distribution, but we try to bend the rules and provide limited support for them. This may or may not be unique to Arch Arm, so you might try asking on their forums as well.

Patch for Bug ID 4755634

Hello,
From where can I download patch for Bug ID 4755634 .
Please provide us with a download link.
Any help is appreciated.
Best regards,
Rupesh

Hi,
My program was crashing on the Solaris 10 platform. I searched on Solaris forum and found that it was related to bug with Bug ID 4755634.
One such suggestion I found at forum was following at
http://forums.sun.comthread.jspa?messageID=10848555
============================
There doesn't appear to be a patch available.
I think its fixed in opensolaris.
I suggest you use the workaround mentioned in the bug report
Work Around:
Insert
mallopt(M_KEEP, 1);
before any memory operations
==============================
I applied the workaround that is used mallopt(M_KEEP , 1); before memory operations and the code is working fine.
As of now is this the only solution or do we have any fix for this.
Regards,
Rajendra

Patch for Bug# 11072246 for Solaris86-64 Platforms

Hello
Is patch for Solaris86-64 Platforms ok for Sun OS 5.10 or they aren't interchangeable ?
https://updates.oracle.com/Orion/Services/download?type=readme&aru=15656564
Oracle Database 11g Release 11.2.0.3.4
OPTIMIZER Patch for Bug# 11072246 for Solaris86-64 Platforms
Thanks and regards,
Pavel

x86 and Sparc are two separate Solaris platforms - patches for these platforms are not interchangeable.
HTH
Srini

Obtaining patchset 9.0.1.4 for bug 2144889

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for