OCS 9042 - 10g upgrade

Has anyone tried an upgrade from 9.0.4.2 to 10g yet ?
I have just downloaded and started browsing through the docs, and have noticed that Oracle Files cannot be upgraded and you must wait for the next release.
Does anyone know anymore about this ?
Regards,
Colin

hi,
Yes.we can not update our 9.0.4,have to wait for next release.
Also in current 10g release,there is no any user interface in content service.
I asked oracle sales,they said the next release with content service included will be release in about 1 or 2 month.
maybe a good news.

Similar Messages

  • Report giving error after 10g upgrade

    We have a custom report which is erroring out after 10g upgrade. Following is the log file-->
    **Starts**24-APR-2009 04:11:21
    ORACLE error 3113 in FDPSTP
    Cause: FDPSTP failed due to ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
    The SQL statement being executed at the time of the error was: SELECT R.Conc_Login_Id, R.Request_Id, R.Phase_Code, R.Status_Code, P
    APP-FND-01564: ORACLE error 1000 in AFPGRG
    Cause: AFPGRG failed due to ORA-01000: maximum open cursors exceeded.
    The SQL statement being executed at the time of the error was: &SQLSTMT and was executed from the file &ERRFILE.
    Start of log messages from FND_FILE
    End of log messages from FND_FILE
    ORACLE error 3114 in AFPRSR-Resubmit_Time
    Cause: AFPRSR-Resubmit_Time failed due to ORA-03114: not connected to ORACLE
    The SQL statement being executed at the time of the error was: SELECT R.Conc_Login_Id, R.Request_Id, R.Phase_Code, R
    SELECT R.Conc_Login_Id, R.Request_Id, R.Phase_Code, R.Status_Code, P.A
    Routine AFPPRD has encountered a fatal error. ORA-03114: not connected to ORACLE
    Contact your system administrator or support representative.
    Shutting down Concurrent Manager : 24-APR-2009 04:11:51
    ORA-01041: internal error. hostdef extension doesn't exist
    ORACLE error 3114 in AFPRSR-Resubmit_Time
    Cause: AFPRSR-Resubmit_Time failed due to ORA-03114: not connected to ORACLE
    The SQL statement being executed at the time of the error was: SELECT R.Conc_Login_Id, R.Request_Id, R.Phase_Code, R
    List of errors encountered:
    _ 1 _
    Routine AFPCMT encountered an ORACLE error. ORA-01041: internal error.
    hostdef extension doesn't exist
    Review your error messages for the cause of the error. (=<POINTER>)
    _ 2 _
    Routine AFPPRD has encountered a fatal error. ORA-03114: not connected
    to ORACLE
    Contact your system administrator or support representative.
    _ 3 _
    Routine AFPPRD has encountered a fatal error. ORA-03114: not connected
    to ORACLE
    Contact your system administrator or support representative.
    However the alert log has following-->
    Errors in file /u07/fatstdb/10g/admin/FATST_fatstdb/udump/fatst_ora_10468.trc:
    ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [qercoStart()+156] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0x00000087D] [] []
    I already increased the cursors from 700 to 900
    How to fix it?

    Hi,
    However the alert log has following-->
    Errors in file /u07/fatstdb/10g/admin/FATST_fatstdb/udump/fatst_ora_10468.trc:
    ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [qercoStart()+156] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0x00000087D] [] []Refer to the lookup to get more details about this error.
    Note: 153788.1 - Troubleshoot an ORA-600 or ORA-7445 Error Using the Error Lookup Tool
    https://metalink2.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=153788.1
    I already increased the cursors from 700 to 900
    How to fix it?Is it possible to increase OPEN_CURSORS to a higher value? Enable trace on this concurrent program, and see if this collects more details about the error.
    Regards,
    Hussein

  • Collection of stats prior to 10g upgrade for dictionary tables

    Collection of stats prior to 10g upgrade for dictionary tables is required? I thought if you are upgrading from 9i to 10g the stats in 9i become stale in 10g.
    I read a document that says you need to collect stats prior to upgrade and import them once your upgrade is done. Can someone guide me?

    I don't know where did you get these? There's some optimizer improvement and new feature in 10g. Collecting stats before upgrade and import later is unheard of.
    I suggest you check this article
    Choosing An Optimal Stats Gathering Strategy
    http://structureddata.org/2008/03/26/choosing-an-optimal-stats-gathering-strategy/
    and the white paper mentioned,
    White Paper entitled Upgrading from Oracle Database 9i to 10g: What to expect from the Optimizer.

  • Heavu CPU Utilization of Dictionary Query - After 9i to 10g Upgrade

    Hi Friends,
    We have migrated our production DB from Oracle 9i(Windows) to Oracle 10g(AIX) and after that a heavy cpu utilization query is coming frequently and hence many timeouts are happening in the application.
    Application is connecting to the database through Java Application (JDBC).
    Once the application service is started, below query is invoked and CPU takes around 20% continuously.
    The interesting thing is this query is not owned by the application schema but by SYS and it's invoked from Application Schema.
    We have raised an SR but still no luck.
    Any help will be very much appreciated.
    SELECT -- Packaged procedures with no arguments package_name AS procedu
    re_cat, owner AS procedure_schem, object_name AS procedure_name, NULL
    , NULL, NULL, 'Packaged procedure' AS remarks, 1 AS procedure_type
    FROM all_arguments WHERE argument_name IS NULL AND data_type IS NULL AN
    D package_name LIKE :3 ESCAPE '/' AND owner LIKE :4 ESCAPE '/' AND obje
    ct_name LIKE :5 ESCAPE '/' UNION ALL SELECT -- Packaged procedures with a
    rguments package_name AS procedure_cat, owner AS procedure_schem, obj
    ect_name AS procedure_name, NULL, NULL, NULL, 'Packaged procedure'
    AS remarks, 1 AS procedure_type FROM all_arguments WHERE argument_name IS
    NOT NULL AND position = 1 AND position = sequence AND package_name L
    IKE :3 ESCAPE '/' AND owner LIKE :4 ESCAPE '/' AND object_name LIKE :5
    ESCAPE '/' UNION ALL SELECT -- Packaged functions package_name AS proce
    dure_cat, owner AS procedure_schem, object_name AS procedure_name, NU
    LL, NULL, NULL, 'Pa
    Regards,
    Savad

    Pl do not post duplicate threads - Heavy CPU Utilization of Dictionary Query - After 9i to 10g Upgrade
    Srini

  • 10g Upgrade on HPIA64 - missing OR510264.SAR  file

    1) Upgrading from 9.2.0.6 to 10.2.0.2 on HPIA64,
    do I first get the OR#10264.SAR files (as below) and apply them to get  Oracle 10.2.0.1.
    Then do I apply the 10.2.0.2 patchset?
    2) Where do I get OR510264.SAR
    To get the HPIA64 10g upgrade files, I go to...
    http://service.sap.com/swdc
    Download
    Installations and Upgrades
    Entry by Application Group
    SAP NetWeaver
    SAP NETWEAVER
    SAP NETWEAVER 2004S
    Installation and Upgrade
    HP-UX
    ORACLE
    Then I download these 7 files.
    DVD ORACLE RDBMS 10.2 HPUX_PARISC_64 1 of 7
    DVD ORACLE RDBMS 10.2 HPUX_PARISC_64 2 of 7
    DVD ORACLE RDBMS 10.2 HPUX_PARISC_64 3 of 7
    DVD ORACLE RDBMS 10.2 HPUX_PARISC_64 4 of 7
    DVD ORACLE RDBMS 10.2 HPUX_PARISC_64 5 of 7
    DVD ORACLE RDBMS 10.2 HPUX_PARISC_64 6 of 7
    DVD ORACLE RDBMS 10.2 HPUX_PARISC_64 7 of 7
    Then on Windows, run the application 51031671_part1.exe to extract these SAR files.
    OR110264.SAR
    OR210264.SAR
    OR310264.SAR
    OR410264.SAR
    OR510264.SAR
    But OR510264.SAR is missing.

    try this:
    https://websmp208.sap-ag.de/installations
    My Company's Application Components
    SAP NETWEAVER
    SAP NETWEAVER 7.0 (2004S)
    Installation and Upgrade
    HP-UX
    Oracle
    go get:
           EXE       51031671_1       DVD ORACLE RDBMS 10.2 HPUX_IA64 1 of 7        Info       683594       10.04.2006
              RAR      51031671_2      DVD ORACLE RDBMS 10.2 HPUX_IA64 2 of 7       Info      683594      10.04.2006
              RAR      51031671_3      DVD ORACLE RDBMS 10.2 HPUX_IA64 3 of 7       Info      683594      10.04.2006
              RAR      51031671_4      DVD ORACLE RDBMS 10.2 HPUX_IA64 4 of 7       Info      683594      10.04.2006
              RAR      51031671_5      DVD ORACLE RDBMS 10.2 HPUX_IA64 5 of 7       Info      683594      10.04.2006
              RAR      51031671_6      DVD ORACLE RDBMS 10.2 HPUX_IA64 6 of 7       Info      683594      10.04.2006
              RAR      51031671_7      DVD ORACLE RDBMS 10.2 HPUX_IA64 7 of 7       Info      616287      10.04.2006
    download all of them, you should get 7 files

  • 10g upgrade

    recently i did an upgrade od DB from 9.2.0.5 to 10.2.0.2
    everything was carried out as per the metalink note..however wen i ran the script:
    SQL> Select substr(owner,1,12) owner,
    2 substr(object_name,1,30) object,
    3 substr(object_type,1,30) type, status
    4 from dba_objects where status <>'VALID'
    i got around 34 objects whuch mainly had synonyms and views invalid..
    also some db-links have become invalid...
    can u kindly let me know wat should be the possible action for this?/
    thanks
    Nk

    yes i tried and i think now only 1 oject is invalid after running the utlrp script
    i was just checking the log i found this:
    pls check the link part:: wat should be done for the link:;
    Miscellaneous Warnings
    WARNING: --> Passwords exist in some database links.
    .... Passwords will be encrypted during the upgrade.
    .... Downgrade of database links with passwords is not supported.
    WARNING: --> Deprecated CONNECT role granted to some user/roles.
    .... CONNECT role after upgrade has only CREATE SESSION privilege.
    WARNING: --> Database contains stale optimizer statistics.
    .... Refer to the 10g Upgrade Guide for instructions to update
    .... statistics prior to upgrading the database.
    .... Component Schemas with stale statistics:
    .... SYS
    WARNING: --> Database contains INVALID objects prior to upgrade.
    .... USER INFORMATICA has 10 INVALID objects.
    .... USER MEADMIN has 23 INVALID objects.
    .... USER SYS has 1 INVALID objects.
    Message was edited by:
    user565186

  • 10G upgrade exam

    Hi All,
    I am preparing for Oracle9i DBA OCPs to Oracle Database 10g upgrade exam 1Z0-040.
    If anyone have sample practice questions/dumps for the same kindly send me at [email protected]
    Thanks in Advanced,
    Bhupinder

    Earlier, there use to be some kind of test dumps available for 9i and other exams. What I heared from few people that they follow the same for 10g upgrade and they failed. Because, the pattern has changed and hardly a couple of questions have come. My recommendation would be read oracle docs for 10g new features, make practice and SYBEX 10g upgrade book might also helpfull.
    Just reading dump and appearing exam could lead you to pass exam, but, ultimately, gaining nothing. Make practice and appear for the exam.
    Jaffar

  • Regarding 10g upgrade exam

    Dear Sir,
    I m shreyas desai from mumbai. I became 9i OCP (DBA track) on 12th sept,2009.
    Now i want to give 10g upgrade exam (1z0-040). But i didn't submitted hands-on form / didn't done any course from oracle uni. Am i able to take and give the next exam?
    How can i obtain OCP Credential?
    Thanks & Regards,
    shreyas desai

    user6727772 wrote:
    Dear Sir,
    I m shreyas desai from mumbai. I became 9i OCP (DBA track) on 12th sept,2009.
    Now i want to give 10g upgrade exam (1z0-040). But i didn't submitted hands-on form / didn't done any course from oracle uni. Am i able to take and give the next exam?
    How can i obtain OCP Credential?
    Thanks & Regards,The first thing to note is that from your email I challenge you that you are not actually a 9i DBA OCP even though you are representing yourself as one.
    Can you confirm you have received a 9i DBA Certification Success Kit from Oracle?
    If the answer is yes you have received a success kit from Oracle:
    - all well and good (and accept my apologies).
    - Taking the 1z0-040 DBA 10g upgrade exam will get your Oracle 10g OCP Certification.
    If the answer is no, and you have merely passed 1z0-007+1z0-0031+1z0-032+1z0-033 then perhaps you need to re-read the certification agreement you agreed when you took your exams:
    1) Reference: [http://education.oracle.com/pls/web_prod-plq-dad/db_pages.getpage?page_id=138]
    2) Reference: [http://www.oracle.com/global/us/education/downloads/certification/certagreement.pdf]
    In particular breach of * especially 3.2 (iii) * representing yourself as OCP when not could actually result in Oracle nullifying all your exam passes and OCA certification and possibily preventing you from taking further exams.
    My guess is you may have been through a WDP program and able to submit that as your 9i online course.
    Please note if you have not received a Certification Success Kit and have and/or have not taken a hands on course there is nothing stopping you taking 1z0-040 any time you can schedule a sitting. However under NO CIRCUMSTANCES can you represent yourself as an OCP without having received the success kit (or meeting all requirements) or the consequences can be considerable.
    Regards - bigdelboy

  • Sampe 10g Upgrade Certification Questions

    Anyone know where to find a good souce for 10g upgrade cert exam (free or not)?
    Thanks,
    Mike

    Hi, Also you can get technical information about the upgrade to 10g into Oracle Press books,
    http://www.oraclepressbooks.com/
    In fact, is recommended that you practice and get experience into the new version before that you take the exam, you should not study only the question for take the exam, in the real world you must use the concepts and experience for resolve the issues or problems.
    Regards.
    Serch-Net.

  • 9i 10g upgrade execution plan differences.

    Hi all,
    I am tring to find execution plan differences after I upgrade production system from 9i to 10gR2. So I have restored only needed tablespaces from my production system (9i) to a new machine and then upgraded thiat Oracle server to 10GR2. At this new server I run a script to get new execution plans of 10g. What suprises me is that query plans of 10g is different and most of new plans choose to access tables via indexes instead of full table scans stated in the original plans taken from 9i. My idea about those differences is that the optimizer takes some values for its cost formula from other system tables that I do not have in 10g server.I guess I am missing something which is not documented in upgrade book.
    any idea?
    Regards.

    9i database is my production database and I regularly run cron jobs for missing or stale statistics on all tables. So there is no possibility to hit a problem on object level statistics. I guess that I am missing something about system level statistics which are the part of the formula (single block read time etc) for cost calculating. So I tried to use setting some statastics via dbms_stat.set_system_statistics procedure, but it did not work.
    Any idea?
    Regards.
    ALPER ÖNEY

  • Oracle 8.0.6 to Oracle 10G Upgrade Query

    Hi,
    I have a customer that has Business Objects Release 5.1.x accessing an Oracle 8.0.6 database. They are planning to migrate the database to Oracle 10G Release 2.0
    Will Business Objects Release 5.1.x reports run off their upgraded Oracle 10G Release 2.0 database or will Business Objects have to be migrated as well ?
    Any pointers or links on this will be very helpful.
    Thx in advance
    Best Regards
    Ramdas

    Hi
    BO5.1 is not supported with Oracle10g so the user has to upgrade their BO version too.
    You can download the Product documentations from help.sap.com for detailed information.
    Regards
    Sourashree

  • Oracle AQ tables - 9i to 10g upgrade

    We have Oracle AQ implemented in one of our application. Our database on the test environment recently went through an upgrade from 9i to 10g. Now when we deploy the application we are getting the following error:
    Caused by: oracle.oc4j.admin.internal.DeployerException: Error initializing ejb-module; Exception Error in application mdo: Error loading package at file:/oc4j/oc4j10.1.2.0/j2ee/soc4j/applications/mdo/mdo.jar, Error deploying file:/oc4j/oc4j10.1.2.0/j2ee/soc4j/applications/mdo/mdo.jar homes: JMS Error: ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_AQADM_SYS", line 5989
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_AQJMS", line 174
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    The user does have the execute privileges. A quick look at the queue table revealed that the table has changed significantly after the 9i to 10g database upgrade and that could be the reason we are seeing this error. Quick differences we are seeing are all columns with DATE datatype on 9i are now defined as TIMESTAMP(6) under 10g, and there is an additional column call user_prop of type SYS.ANYDATA.
    Can somebody please confirm this ? I thought Oracle AQ will be backwards compatible and will be an abstract interface to the application but looks like its not. How do I get this issue resolved ?

    I suggest you revoke all the privileges and grant once again.
    Privileges:-
    GRANT EXECUTE ON DBMS_AQ TO User;
    GRANT EXECUTE ON DBMS_AQADM TO User;
    GRANT EXECUTE ON DBMS_AQJMS TO User;
    GRANT EXECUTE ON DBMS_AQIN TO User;
    Regards,
    Sanjeev

  • 9.0.3.5 to 10g upgrade exception

    I'm having a similiar problem to post#397238 reported in Oct. Does anyone know the fix? I'm using the 10g Workbench Build 031022 on the Windows platform and trying to upgrade a workbench file created in 9.0.3.5.
    - Matt
    Exception Description: The method [isStub] on the object [oracle.toplink.workbench.model.meta.MWClass] triggered an exception.
    Internal Exception: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
    Target Invocation Exception: java.lang.NullPointerException
    Mapping: oracle.toplink.mappings.DirectToFieldMapping[stub-->class.stub]
    Descriptor: XMLDescriptor(oracle.toplink.workbench.model.meta.MWClass --> [DatabaseTable(class)])
    Local Exception Stack:
    Exception [TOPLINK-99] (OracleAS TopLink - 10g (10.0.3) Developer Preview (Build 031022)): oracle.toplink.exceptions.DescriptorException
    Exception Description: The method [isStub] on the object [oracle.toplink.workbench.model.meta.MWClass] triggered an exception.
    Internal Exception: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
    Target Invocation Exception: java.lang.NullPointerException
    Mapping: oracle.toplink.mappings.DirectToFieldMapping[stub-->class.stub]
    Descriptor: XMLDescriptor(oracle.toplink.workbench.model.meta.MWClass --> [DatabaseTable(class)])
         at oracle.toplink.exceptions.DescriptorException.targetInvocationWhileGettingValueThruMethodAccessor(DescriptorException.java:1420)
         at oracle.toplink.internal.descriptors.MethodAttributeAccessor.getAttributeValueFromObject(MethodAttributeAccessor.java:45)
         at oracle.toplink.mappings.DatabaseMapping.getAttributeValueFromObject(DatabaseMapping.java:313)
         at oracle.toplink.mappings.DirectToFieldMapping.buildCloneValue(DirectToFieldMapping.java:98)
         at oracle.toplink.mappings.DirectToFieldMapping.buildClone(DirectToFieldMapping.java:83)
         at oracle.toplink.internal.descriptors.ObjectBuilder.populateAttributesForClone(ObjectBuilder.java:1453)
         at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.UnitOfWork.cloneAndRegisterNewObject(UnitOfWork.java:581)
         at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.UnitOfWork.internalRegisterObject(UnitOfWork.java:2334)
         at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.UnitOfWork.registerObject(UnitOfWork.java:3144)
         at oracle.toplink.mappings.CollectionMapping.buildElementClone(CollectionMapping.java:152)
         at oracle.toplink.mappings.CollectionMapping.buildCloneForPartObject(CollectionMapping.java:101)
         at oracle.toplink.internal.indirection.NoIndirectionPolicy.cloneAttribute(NoIndirectionPolicy.java:43)
         at oracle.toplink.mappings.ForeignReferenceMapping.buildClone(ForeignReferenceMapping.java:161)
         at oracle.toplink.internal.descriptors.ObjectBuilder.populateAttributesForClone(ObjectBuilder.java:1453)
         at oracle.toplink.mappings.AggregateMapping.buildClonePart(AggregateMapping.java:129)
         at oracle.toplink.mappings.AggregateMapping.buildClone(AggregateMapping.java:105)
         at oracle.toplink.internal.descriptors.ObjectBuilder.populateAttributesForClone(ObjectBuilder.java:1453)
         at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.UnitOfWork.cloneAndRegisterNewObject(UnitOfWork.java:581)
         at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.UnitOfWork.internalRegisterObject(UnitOfWork.java:2334)
         at oracle.toplink.publicinterface.UnitOfWork.registerObject(UnitOfWork.java:3144)
         at oracle.toplink.workbench.ui.WorkbenchSession.registerProject(WorkbenchSession.java:563)
         at oracle.toplink.workbench.ui.WorkbenchSession.addProject(WorkbenchSession.java:147)
         at oracle.toplink.workbench.ui.WorkbenchSession.addNewProject(WorkbenchSession.java:133)
         at oracle.toplink.workbench.ui.MainView.addNewProject(MainView.java:239)
         at oracle.toplink.workbench.filesystem.MWFileFactory.openImp(MWFileFactory.java:204)
         at oracle.toplink.workbench.filesystem.MWFileFactory.open(MWFileFactory.java:156)
         at oracle.toplink.tsceditor.persistence.PersistenceManager.open(PersistenceManager.java:747)
         at oracle.toplink.tsceditor.ui.persistence.DefaultUIPersistence.open(DefaultUIPersistence.java:181)
         at oracle.toplink.tsceditor.ui.persistence.UIPersistenceManager.open(UIPersistenceManager.java:625)
         at oracle.toplink.tsceditor.ui.persistence.UIPersistenceManager$OpenFile.execute(UIPersistenceManager.java:1095)
         at oracle.toplink.tsceditor.utility.Thread.run(Thread.java:114)
    Caused by: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
         at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor81.invoke(Unknown Source)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.toplink.internal.descriptors.MethodAttributeAccessor.getAttributeValueFromObject(MethodAttributeAccessor.java:39)
         ... 29 more
    Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
         at oracle.toplink.workbench.model.meta.MWClass.superclassIsDefaultValue(MWClass.java:1253)
         at oracle.toplink.workbench.model.meta.MWClass.isStub(MWClass.java:1214)
         ... 33 more

    Matt,
    I work on the Mapping Workbench development team and would like to resolve this problem. If possible, can you send me your 9.0.3.5 project files? Respond directly to me at [email protected]
    Thanks,
    Karen

  • DB Performance Issues after 10g Upgrade in EBS Instance

    We have upgraded our Database from 9i to 10g as first part of EBS 11.5.9 to 11.5.10.2 upgrade. Currently our production is running on 11.5.9 apps with 10g DB.
    Facing performance problems now. one of the them is, one Valueset query not using funcion based index while fired from the front end. but the same query when collected from SQL trace tkprofed file and executed from SQL Plus, it uses all proper indexes. We are not getting the cause of this.
    Had anyone faced same kind of issues before. please suggest.
    thanks,
    Raj.

    Make sure you have all of the recommended performance patches for 11.5.9, and gather stats for SYS and SYSTEM in the following manner:
    Oracle E-Business Suite Recommended Performance Patches
    http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=244040.1
    Collecting Statistics with Oracle Apps 11i
    http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=368252.1
    execute dbms_stats.unlock_schema_stats('SYS');
    execute dbms_stats.unlock_schema_stats('SYSTEM');
    exec dbms_stats.gather_schema_stats('SYSTEM',options=>'GATHER', estimate_percent => 100, method_opt => 'FOR ALL COLUMNS SIZE AUTO', cascade => TRUE);
    exec dbms_stats.gather_schema_stats('SYS',options=>'GATHER', estimate_percent => 100, method_opt => 'FOR ALL COLUMNS SIZE AUTO', cascade => TRUE);
    exec dbms_stats.gather_fixed_objects_stats();
    commit;
    exec dbms_stats.DELETE_TABLE_STATS('SYS','X$KCCRSR');
    exec dbms_stats.LOCK_TABLE_STATS('SYS','X$KCCRSR');
    commit;
    The last 3 commands resolve problems with RMAN, in case you are using it.
    Rman Backup is Very Slow selecting from V$RMAN_STATUS
    http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=375386.1
    Poor performance when accessing V$RMAN_BACKUP_JOB_DETAILS
    http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=420200.1
    Troubleshooting Oracle Applications Performance Issues
    http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=169935.1
    Debugging General Performance Issues with Oracle Apps
    http://blogs.oracle.com/schan/newsItems/departments/optimizingPerformance/2007/05/18#a1548
    Performance Tuning the Apps Database Layer
    http://blogs.oracle.com/schan/newsItems/departments/optimizingPerformance/2007/05/17#a1562
    Preventing Apps 11i Performance Issues in Four Steps
    http://blogs.oracle.com/schan/newsItems/departments/optimizingPerformance/2007/05/21#a1566

  • Pros and Cons af Oracle 10g upgrade to 11g

    Hi Basis Expert,
    We have an requirement of SAP upgrade which includes BW 3.5, CRM and R/3 (4.7).
    These components needs to be upgraded to the latest version
    BW 3.5 to BI 7.0
    R/3 (4.7) to ECC 6.0
    and also CRM upgrade to the new version
    The OS used is AIX and DB used is oracle 10g.
    Can anybody share the pros and cons of oracle DB upgrade from 10g to 11g after SAP upgrade.
    Regards,
    Anil.

    Hi DatabaseSAP and others,
    Thanks for your reply
    I started with the Oracle 11g software installer. But it gave an error during 71%. Error is
    Error in invoking target 'rat_on part_on dm_on olap_on sdo_on' of makefile '/oracle/DBW/112_64/rdbms/lib/ins_rdbms.mk'.
    See '/oracle/DBW/oraInventory/logs/installActions2011-10-10_12-04-03PM.log' for details.
    Abort      Retry         Continue
    But when i was going thorough the installActions2011-10-10_12-04-03PM.log . I could find that there are 7 arguments which is failed.
    Below are the argument  details
    1)INFO: Hard Limit: maximum user processes: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the hard limit for "maximum user processes" is set to at least 16384.
    INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
    INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
    INFO: -
    Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
    INFO: Expected Value:1024
    INFO: Actual Value:9223372036854775807
    INFO: -
    INFO: *********************************************
    INFO: Hard Limit: maximum user processes: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the hard limit for "maximum user processes" is set to at least 16384.
    INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
    INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
    INFO: -
    INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
    INFO: Expected Value:16384
    INFO: Actual Value:3048
    INFO: Error Message:PRVF-4354 : Proper hard limit for resource "maximum user processes" not found on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "16384" ; Found = "3048"]
    INFO: Cause: Hard limit for the resource does not meet the requirement on the specified node.
    INFO: Action: Modify the resource limits to meet the requirement.
    2)INFO: OS Kernel Parameter: ncargs: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the OS kernel parameter "ncargs" is properly set.
    INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
    INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
    INFO: -
    INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
    INFO: Expected Value:128
    INFO: Actual Value:6
    INFO: Error Message:PRVF-7543 : OS Kernel parameter "ncargs" does not have proper value on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "128" ; Found = "6"].
    INFO: Cause: Kernel parameter value does not meet the requirement.
    INFO: Action: Modify the kernel parameter value to meet the requirement.
    3)INFO: OS Kernel Parameter: tcp_ephemeral_low: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the OS kernel parameter "tcp_ephemeral_low" is properly set.
    INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
    INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
    INFO: -
    INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
    INFO: Expected Value:9000
    INFO: Actual Value:32768
    INFO: Error Message:PRVF-7543 : OS Kernel parameter "tcp_ephemeral_low" does not have proper value on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "9000" ; Found = "32768"].
    INFO: Cause: Kernel parameter value does not meet the requirement.
    INFO: Action: Modify the kernel parameter value to meet the requirement.
    4)INFO: OS Kernel Parameter: tcp_ephemeral_high: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the OS kernel parameter "tcp_ephemeral_high" is properly set.
    INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
    INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
    INFO: -
    INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
    INFO: Expected Value:65500
    INFO: Actual Value:65535
    INFO: Error Message:PRVF-7543 : OS Kernel parameter "tcp_ephemeral_high" does not have proper value on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "65500" ; Found = "65535"].
    INFO: Cause: Kernel parameter value does not meet the requirement.
    INFO: Action: Modify the kernel parameter value to meet the requirement.
    5)INFO: OS Kernel Parameter: udp_ephemeral_low: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the OS kernel parameter "udp_ephemeral_low" is properly set.
    INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
    INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
    INFO: -
    INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
    INFO: Expected Value:9000
    INFO: Actual Value:32768
    INFO: Error Message:PRVF-7543 : OS Kernel parameter "udp_ephemeral_low" does not have proper value on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "9000" ; Found = "32768"].
    INFO: Cause: Kernel parameter value does not meet the requirement.
    INFO: Action: Modify the kernel parameter value to meet the requirement.
    INFO: -
    6)INFO: OS Kernel Parameter: udp_ephemeral_high: This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the OS kernel parameter "udp_ephemeral_high" is properly set.
    INFO: Severity:IGNORABLE
    INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
    INFO: -
    INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
    INFO: Expected Value:65500
    INFO: Actual Value:65535
    INFO: Error Message:PRVF-7543 : OS Kernel parameter "udp_ephemeral_high" does not have proper value on node "p19849dev136" [Expected = "65500" ; Found = "65535"].
    INFO: Cause: Kernel parameter value does not meet the requirement.
    INFO: Action: Modify the kernel parameter value to meet the requirement.
    7)INFO: Users With Same UID: This test checks that multiple users do not exist with user id as "0".
    INFO: Severity:CRITICAL
    INFO: OverallStatus:VERIFICATION_FAILED
    INFO: -
    INFO: Verification Result for Node:p19849dev136
    WARNING: Result values are not available for this verification task
    INFO: Error Message:<CV_VAL>root,|super,|zero,|</CV_VAL><CV_ERES>0</CV_ERES>
    INFO: Cause:Cause Of Problem Not Available
    INFO: Action:User Action Not Available
    INFO: *********************************************
    Please let me know what is the 7th (last one) argument.
    Regards,
    Anil Shenoy

Maybe you are looking for