Odd Query behaviour

Hi Experts,
I am experiencing some problems with a query which is designed simply to show whether or not there is data in a single field.
SELECT T0.[CardCode], T0.[U_7DayExpiry], T0.[U_LstCRCallStat], T1.[Name] FROM OCRD T0 INNER JOIN [dbo].[@CR_CONTROL_STATUS] T1 ON T0.U_LstCRCallStat = T1.Code WHERE T0.[U_7DayExpiry] is not null
You can see that there is data from a UDT being pulled into the query. When I try and run the query with the UDT included I get No Data Was Found....
However, when I removed the UDT from the query:
SELECT T0.[CardCode], T0.[CardName], T0.[U_7DayExpiry] FROM OCRD T0 WHERE T0.[U_7DayExpiry] IS NOT NULL
...I get the correct results.
Why would the addition of the UDT to my query criteria cause this please?
Thanks
Geoff

I reckon its something to do with data from the left table (OCRD.U_LstCRCallStat) not matching up with data from the right (joined) table (@CR_CONTROL_STATUS.Code).
If you make the INNER into a LEFT, do you get any results back?

Similar Messages

10.6.5 update - 27" iMac, Radeon 5750 odd graphics behaviours?

I updated my new iMac 27" to OS 10.6.5 today and have seen some odd graphics behaviours.
1. Dock icon for Activity Monitor becomes transparent. Running AM, hidden showing CPU history
2. White rectangle at bottom of expanding folder (list view)
3. OK Button blue/white check mark pattern when configuring VPN. GUI feels "slow"
I updated using the Software Update tool; noticed these issues and re-updated using the Combo Installer; no change.
Any ideas or suggestions? Is this just me? I have a MacBook -- no probems at all!

N Gallagher,
I had the problem earluer, but it got far worse with 10.6.5, however, I fixed it by updating my wacom tablet driver.
It wasn't the system update, but an old driver causing the problem.
Resetting PRAM, SMC and permissions and all the other standard drivel people post is nice sentiments, but it should be clear that the problem is something else because that solution hasn't solved the problem for anyone.
I have the sneaky suspicion that it's old flash and old drivers for most people.
See my original post here: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=12570261#12570261
BUT. If you have a Wacom tablet, for to their website and download the latest driver from September 10, 2010.
That's all it took for all my graphics problems to go away.

Odd software behaviour Lumia 720

I'm the proud owner of a Lumia 720 since July. I'm facing some odd software behaviour recently though. Without notice or any pattern, the current app changes to another one, sometimes four or five times while my phone vibrates like mad. It happens two, or three times a week, and there's no significant pattern but this weird "phone on speed" behaviour always ends in the Bing app. I thought rebooting was the answer but it doesn't. Does someone has any clue?

Ugura,
Thanks for your reply. I adjusted the touch sensitivity but that did not do the trick. Last night, I was already sleeping, suddenly my Lumina 720 played a song that I played before many weeks ago. That was quite odd too. With my phone connected to the charger, me asleep and there was that terrible noise from an old U2-song... And I could not stop it, nor could I lower the volume so I had to turn on my computer to find the keys to a soft reset and it was in the middle of the night.
So I waited till this morning to reset my phone to it's factory-settings. Much to my annoyance- without any external app loaded, the phone went on nuts again. This time, while vibrating taking numerous screen shots... It's like my phone is haunted. A little poltergeist in it. I need some high-tec exorcism I'm afraid.
Hope someone can help me further!

Different query behaviour (index or no index use) between sql and pl/sql

Hi All,
I have a query inside a cursor in a procedure, let's say:
cursor c_emp (b_dept_no in number)
is
select *
from emp
where dept_no = b_dep_no;
There is an non unique index on dept_no.
In this procedure i first loop through another cursor which gets the dept_no and with this dept_no i go into a for loop for the c_emp cursor.
When i run this procedure i see that the explain plan of above query gives me a Full table Scan on EMP, eventhough there is a index on dept_no and there are 1.3 million records in the em table. When i take the above query and explain it seperately, it uses the index on dept_no.
I have rebuild/analyzed the tables and indexes, nothing seems to work. Even hints in the procedure cursor are not helping at all.
I'm using Oracle Database 10.2.0.1.0 and have never seen such behaviour before.
Anyone an idea what is going on here?
Kind regards,
Dave

Hoi Rob,
it's like i have three tables. The first i have to get data from for my output, then for every record of table one there are one or more records in table 2 and table 3.
I had to create a xml file and it looks like this:
<Table1 Record 1>
<Name>...</Name>
etc...
<Table2 Record 1>
</Table2 Record 1>
<Table2 Record 2>
</Table2 Record 2>
<Table3 Record 1>
</Table3 Record 1>
<Table3 Record 2>
</Table3 Record 2>
<Table1 Record 2>
etc.etc.etc.
So that's why i programmed:
for r_1 in c_table1 loop
for r_2 in c_table2(r_1.dept_no) loop
end loop;
for r_3 in c_table3(r_1.dept_no) loop
end loop;
end loop;
And when i look at the first record,
it has 2 records in table2 en 16 records in table3. So nothing huge.
For now i'm unable to trace the session. I will try to post the tkprof later.
Kind regards,
Dave

Odd SocketPermission behaviour

Hi,
I've been trying to use SocketPermissions to restrict the IP addresses from which a ServerSocket will accept a connection and am getting some wierd behaviour.
The ServerSocket will reject and close the first connection attempt from a disallowed address. Subsequent connections from the same host (using telnet) are not rejected/accepted or closed - they just 'hang there'.
The SecurityManager is also really slow at deciding whether a connection can be accepted or rejected.
Is this usual ? Or is there a way to setup SecurityManager to behave 'nicely' ?
regards
Tony Seebregts

Just spent about an hour playing around with various things and now it seems to have resolved itself. Odd... Marking this topic as answered now.

Odd Quicklook behaviour

Running mavericks 10.9.2 have noticed a small quirk in the behaviour on one of my installs.
Selecting a group of images (mostly jpegs, sometimes tiffs) and opening quicklook. scrollling through
and quite randomly some of the images will momentarily flash up then turn blank, if you cycle through to the start and continue
sometimes those that didn't show, will show and vice versa. if you select the grid option then all will show.
all images are in either sRGB or RGB in the most part 8 bit, and all without layers or alpha channels.
there is another hard drive on my machine that has the same version of mavericks
and does not display this behaviour
I have also removed the quick look preferences from the users library and restarted but the behaviour continues.
so i was wondering if anyone has come across this and if they have any ideas as to why this might be happening
any known issues with third party apps etc.
any advice would be gratefully received
thanks in advance.

Just spent about an hour playing around with various things and now it seems to have resolved itself. Odd... Marking this topic as answered now.

Odd return behaviour

okay, consider the following example:
public class Oops {
     public static void main(String args[]){
1:          String oops;
2:          return;
3:          System.out.println(oops);
}we get compile error at 3 saying unreachable statement .. fair enough.
now, consider this:
public class Oops {
     public static void main(String args[]){
1:          String oops;
2:          if(true) return;
3:          System.out.println(oops);
}we have modified two and now there is no errors whats-so-ever.
However, the odd behaviour hecomes obvious if we comment out line 2 where we will get "variable oops might not have been initialized." ... so it would seem that it can recognize that if(true) return; will not let the program reach 3 and hence doesn't care if oops is initialized but why don't we get a similiar error as in example one?

I don't see anything bizarre about this question. What
are you referring to?Perhaps 'bizarre' was a poor choice of words. It's just that I recall silkm posting a rather similar question before (a question about how the compiler/jvm handles thing rather than what API can one use to make foo.
No, that's not a possibility. The JLS explains exactly
why this behavior occurs:
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/
tatements.doc.html#236365
The reason that the second example compiles is so that
you can have code that is conditionally compiled such
as debugging statements. It's not bizarre at all, it's
entirely pragmatic and practical.Yes, of course, makes sense. (Although the possibility of a compiler optimizing it out is flashed there.)

Odd SOAMANAGER behaviour

Ok, I just managed to get my old Dell D610 replaced, but this new laptop has some odd behaviour with some Solman transactions. I can get into Solman Web Workcenter no problem, but when I try to open SOAMANAGER, I get one blank IE8 window (looks like it's supposed to be hidden), and then a few seconds later a second normal looking IE8 window opens, with a partial URL. This appears to be a problem with my local profile - I can log in to someone else's machine and it'll work, and a coworker can log into my laptop and it'll also work.
This is the URL it directs the second window to.. https://<server>.<domain>.com/sap/public/myssocntl?sap-client=100
whereas this is where it should be going. https://<server.domain>.com/sap/bc/webdynpro/sap/appl_soap_management?sap-client=100&sap-language=EN
Anyone have any ideas here? If I call my help desk they're going to be clueless on this one.. lol..
thanks.
bk

Maybe you can rename your home folder in c:\documents and settings and login again - thereby recreating your local profile.

Odd JMS Behaviour

With our application deployed to a client, we have been experiencing some odd behaviour with JMS in Oracle 10g (OC4J 9.0.4).
The application posts multiple non-transactional messages (roughly 400-500Kb per message) to a queue, which an MDB processes correctly everywhere but the client site. At the client site, only the first message in retrieved from the queue by the MDB, as if to suggest the queue was only capable of holding one message and the other messages are not being added or are being dumped. No exceptions are being thrown, which isn't helpnig diagnose the problem.
The client site has a similar environment to our internal dev/qa environments - Red Hat AS 3.0 server, v1.4.2 jvm, same OC4J and application config.
Has anyone else experienced this kind of behaviour with JMS?

Just spent about an hour playing around with various things and now it seems to have resolved itself. Odd... Marking this topic as answered now.

Really odd module behaviour

This is very strange.
First, this works ok:
dbxml> setNamespace x http://www.example.com
Binding x -> http://www.example.com
dbxml> query 'declare function x:foo() as element() {<foo><bar></bar></foo>}; x:foo()'
1 objects returned for eager expression 'declare function x:foo() as element() {<foo><bar></bar></foo>}; x:foo()'
dbxml> print
<foo><bar/></foo>
Now lets do the same thing in a module:
doug@andari:tmp$ cat > x.xquery
module namespace x = "http://www.example.com";
declare function x:foo() as element() { <foo><bar></bar></foo>};
doug@andari:tmp$ dbxml
dbxml> setBaseUri "file:///home/doug/tmp/"
Base URI = file:///home/doug/tmp/
dbxml> query 'import module namespace x = "http://www.example.com" at "x.xquery"; x:foo()'
1 objects returned for eager expression 'import module namespace x = "http://www.example.com" at "x.xquery"; x:foo()'
dbxml> print
<foo/>
That's definitely wrong. I'm getting the same behaviour with all sorts of modules that worked perfectly well on 2.3.10. Since the forums aren't full of complaints, I'm guessing this is only affecting me. I've built the software on two machines though, and I get the same behaviour.
Any ideas how to track down what's causing this?
Cheers,
Doug.

Hi John,
I applied the patch and it fixed the issue. Thanks.
But I have encountered another issue related to import module. I have written up a simple test case to illustrate the problem.
I created two files, test01.xqm and test02.xqm, and put them in the same directory.
======= test01.xqm =========
module namespace test01="http://www.mydomain.com/xquery/modules/test01";
import module namespace test02="http://www.mydomain.com/xquery/modules/test02" at "test02.xqm";
declare function test01:main() as xs:string?
$test02:myString
declare function test01:main2() as xs:string?
test02:main()
========= test02.xqm ========
module namespace test02="http://www.mydomain.com/xquery/modules/test02";
declare variable $test02:myString as xs:string := "test02 has a string";
declare function test02:main() as xs:string?
$test02:myString
==========================
dbxml> setBaseUri "file:///home/lap/bdbxml/debug/"
Base URI = file:///home/lap/bdbxml/debug/
dbxml> query ' import module namespace test01="http://www.mydomain.com/xquery/modules/test01" at "test01.xqm"; test01:main() '
stdin:2: query failed, Error: A variable called {http://www.mydomain.com/xquery/modules/test02}myString does not exist [err:XPST0008], file:///home/lap/bdbxml/debug/test01.xqm:7:3
dbxml> query ' import module namespace test01="http://www.mydomain.com/xquery/modules/test01" at "test01.xqm"; test01:main2() '
stdin:3: query failed, Error: A variable called {http://www.mydomain.com/xquery/modules/test02}myString does not exist [err:XPST0008], file:///home/lap/bdbxml/debug/test02.xqm:7:3
dbxml> query ' import module namespace test02="http://www.mydomain.com/xquery/modules/test02" at "test02.xqm"; test02:main() '
1 objects returned for eager expression ' import module namespace test02="http://www.mydomain.com/xquery/modules/test02" at "test02.xqm"; test02:main() '
dbxml> print
test02 has a string
=================================
Looks like from test01.xqm, it can see test02:main() but not $test02:myString.
Any advice would help. Thanks!
--Lapinski

Query Behaviour

Hello,
I would like to thank you for your time.
I would like your help for the next issue.It is a real problem,but i will presente you like an example.
I have a view which is composed as below
viewa =
sel * from
calendar_dim
inner join
sel * from table_a
inner join table_b
union all
sel * from table_c
inner join table_D
on...
All the tables , table_a table_b table_c table_d have the same partition column(on date column) , stats are up to date .
My question is the following,
If i will try to do a qurey such as
sel *
from viewa
where cal_Date = '2013-05-31'
-->> the explain plan works perfect. It takes only one partiiton from each table and produce the result.
The same happens with multiple date , /......where cal_Date in ('2013-05-31','','',.......)
(it takes the correct number of partitions ).
BUT , if i will try to inner join this view with a table , which contain 10 distinct dates , i was waiting to have 10 partitions from each table of the view inner join this spool with the external table.
sel a.*
from viewa a
inner join table_e b
on a.cal_Date = b.cal_Date
, it does a full table scan(instead of taking only the necessary partitions) ,The issue is that the 4 tables inside the view are very big,about 1 billion rows.
Solution on this?
I tried to make a table (with one column = date ) which contains only the distinct date that i am expected but nothing.Still the same behaviour.
Thank you very much for your time.

Dimitris wrote:
To be honest i was working on Oracle Db's , but i face this issue on a different DB.But due to the fact , i really trust this forum,i posted here.
I cannot use hint's, one ex-colleague , gave me an alternative solution..
select a.*
from viewa a, (select distinct cal_Date from table_e) b
where a.cal_date = b.cal_date
I posted this question, as a theory in sql and if someone else has faced the same problem in the past.
Your question is a variation on a fairly standard problem - and as we've moved through the last 5 versions of Oracle (v7 - v11) the optimizer's ability to deal with that class of query has been constantly improving; to the extent that the optimizer can even do things like moving a common join from inside the union all to outside the union all. (viz: (select from (A join C) union all select (B join C)) can become (select from (A union all B) join C)) - but there's still the problem of how to handle joins to "unknown" values - which is what your query is.
As a simplified example: joining a driving table to a partitioned table on the partitioning key, Oracle can do a nested loop join using KEY partition elimination; it can use "subquery pruning" against the driving table to derive a list of join values that allows it to do a hash join to the correct subset of partitions using KEY(SQ); it can generate a Bloom filter from the driving table to use in a hash join that eliminates partitions on the Bloom filter.
In your case, the only option Oracle has (at present) is the equivalent of the KEY partition elimination, hence the nested loop / push join predicate target, or the (undocumented) "turn the unknown table content into a list of known values" to fall back to your "literal list" approach that takes advantage of transitive closure.
I suspect your "select distinct" (which, by the way, is logically NOT the same query unless you have declared a uniqueness constraint on table_e.cal_date) may be affecting the arithmetic, or may simply be supplying an implicit uniqueness constraint that allows the nested loop / KEY approach to be taken. In the absence of any execution plans, though, we still have no solid ideas of what's happening and why it's happening.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis

Odd gmail behaviour when using mail.app

Hello there,
Ever since upgrading to Mavericks, I've been experiencing odd behaviour when sending messages from my gmail account in mail.app. I send a message and up to ten copies of the message appear in mail.app's trash.
Does anyone know what might be the cause of this?
many thanks,
Chidi

this is a setting in gmail that interfer with mail.app
the setting is that mail.app is that when you type a mail it will auto save it while you are typing. and gmail will delete the saved onece and the mail.app will create a new all the time
duno how to turn this off, try by rebuilding the mailbox in mail.app

Strange db adapter query behaviour

Has anyone come across this before....We have an issue with a couple of BPEL processes that query a view in an oracle 10g database. We select several fields from the view, 3 of which are fields in a table which are of DATE datatype. When the query runs we are starting to see this behaviour (but not all the time):
<next_inv_date>2011-03-28T00:00:00.000+01:00</next_inv_date>
<date_from>2011-03-27T00:00:00.000+00:00</date_from>
<date_to>1900-01-01T00:00:00.000+00:00</date_to>
As you can see, the field next_inv_date contains a +1 timezone shift. The output variable is setup with all the date fields of type dateTime. I did not think that timezone was stored in a DATE field, so how can this possibly be?
Thanks.

Hi there,
whether or not the query returns anything at each polling interval it still polls every 40 seconds.
For documentation on polling concepts closest would be this doc link here:
http://download-east.oracle.com/docs/cd/B31017_01/integrate.1013/b28994/adptr_db.htm#CHDEFACG
Thanks
Steve

Odd gc behaviour?

Hi,
I'm working on a web application (Jetty, running inside JBoss 3.2.1, Redhat Linux, dual Xeon CPUs, hotspot 1.4.2_04 or sometimes 1.4.2_05) whose gc behaviour seems rather odd. I have been watching visualgc while the application is under load and have observed the following:
Using the default collector:
* I have turned off explicit GCs
* Eden is about 400M and is collected whenever it fills up. Under the load test I've been looking at this occurs about every 30 seconds This collection occurs very quickly (normally a few milliseconds). There will normally be around 2M of garbage at the end of that collection which goes straight into the old generation (maybe via s0 and s1, depending on the settings I'm using)
* The old generation is also about 400M. However, collections of the old generation happen almost every time that a collection Eden occurs, even though the old generation is very far from full. (In the test I've been looking it seems to have a "steady state" of around 100M). Collections of old take a relatively long time, normally around 1 or 2 seconds. This is an unacceptably long time for our application.
This seems very odd to me as I wouldn't expect the old generation to be collected every time Eden fills up. For our application it would be perfectly acceptable for the old generation to fill up slowly each time Eden is collected, and then for one big GC to occur once that filled up (which would once every hour or two). But re-collecting the same bit of memory in the old generation twice a minute (at a couple of times per minute) is just no good. I don't understand why the old generation is collected whenever Eden is collected.
I have tried the concurrent old-generation collector and this only made the problem worse. I also tried setting the old-generation threshold for the concurrent collector to 90% and this made no different - the old generation was still collected every time that Eden filled up.
Strangely enough, when using the parallel (high throughput) collector for Eden, the problem almost went away. I say "almost" because although no collections occured in the old generation occurred until the old generation had filled completely, the very first old generation collection (which sent it back to its "natural" 100M ") seemed to send it back to its old habits: an old generation collection for every Eden collection.
Does anybody have any idea what might be going on? Could there be something weird about our application? Am I missing some crucial GC option? Have I stumbled across a GC bug? Do I just not understand hwo this stuff all works?
Any pointers much appreciated, thanks for your time.
David

Hi,
Thanks for responding.
I started the vm with the following options:
-Dsun.net.client.defaultConnectTimeout=15000 -Dsun.net.client.defaultReadTimeout=15000 -XX:+DisableExplicitGC -XX:+UsePerfData -Xmn512m -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m -XX:PermSize=64m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -XX:MaxTenuringThreshold=0 -XX:+PrintHeapAtGC -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps -XX:+PrintGCDetails -XX:+PrintTenuringDistribution
(Note that I've set -XX:MaxTenuringThreshold=0 for this test so I could reproduce the problem more quickly. If I set it to something smaller then the problem still occurs, just less frequently).
I've got loads and loads of output from the GC trace (I ran a load test on it) so I'll just include an excerpt containing some of the full GCs that I am not expecting. Watching the proceedings in visualgc, I noted that most of the GCs I've included below involved a collection of the old generation (for reasons I cannot fathom). However, they are not noted as "Full GC" in the trace. Any help in understanding this much appreciated:
722.391: [GC {Heap before GC invocations=72:
Heap
def new generation   total 471872K, used 419455K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 99% used [0x44950000, 0x5e2efff8, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K,   0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
to   space 52416K,   0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
tenured generation   total 524288K, used 103760K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
   the space 524288K, 19% used [0x64950000, 0x6aea4338, 0x6aea4400, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26031K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
   the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bbdb0, 0x862bbe00, 0x88950000)
722.392: [DefNew
Desired survivor size 26836992 bytes, new threshold 0 (max 0)
: 419455K->0K(471872K), 0.0272900 secs] 523216K->105143K(996160K) Heap after GC invocations=73:
Heap
def new generation total 471872K, used 0K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 0% used [0x44950000, 0x44950000, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K, 0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to space 52416K, 0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation total 524288K, used 105143K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
the space 524288K, 20% used [0x64950000, 0x6affdfc8, 0x6affe000, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26031K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bbdb0, 0x862bbe00, 0x88950000)
} , 0.0280260 secs]
734.030: [GC {Heap before GC invocations=73:
Heap
def new generation   total 471872K, used 419456K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 100% used [0x44950000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K,   0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to   space 52416K,   0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation   total 524288K, used 105143K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
   the space 524288K, 20% used [0x64950000, 0x6affdfc8, 0x6affe000, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26033K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
   the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bc538, 0x862bc600, 0x88950000)
734.031: [DefNew: 419456K->419456K(471872K), 0.0000370 secs]734.031: [Tenured: 105143K->106385K(524288K), 1.2275840 secs] 524599K->106385K(996160K) Heap after GC invocations=74:
Heap
def new generation total 471872K, used 0K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 0% used [0x44950000, 0x44950000, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K, 0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to space 52416K, 0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation total 524288K, used 106385K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
the space 524288K, 20% used [0x64950000, 0x6b134458, 0x6b134600, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26033K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bc538, 0x862bc600, 0x88950000)
} , 1.2283850 secs]
747.317: [GC {Heap before GC invocations=74:
Heap
def new generation   total 471872K, used 419455K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 99% used [0x44950000, 0x5e2efff0, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K,   0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to   space 52416K,   0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation   total 524288K, used 106385K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
   the space 524288K, 20% used [0x64950000, 0x6b134458, 0x6b134600, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26033K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
   the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bc718, 0x862bc800, 0x88950000)
747.317: [DefNew: 419455K->419455K(471872K), 0.0000380 secs]747.317: [Tenured: 106385K->107602K(524288K), 1.2445540 secs] 525841K->107602K(996160K) Heap after GC invocations=75:
Heap
def new generation total 471872K, used 0K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 0% used [0x44950000, 0x44950000, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K, 0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to space 52416K, 0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation total 524288K, used 107602K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
the space 524288K, 20% used [0x64950000, 0x6b2649f8, 0x6b264a00, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26033K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bc718, 0x862bc800, 0x88950000)
} , 1.2453910 secs]
761.940: [GC {Heap before GC invocations=75:
Heap
def new generation   total 471872K, used 419456K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 100% used [0x44950000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K,   0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to   space 52416K,   0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation   total 524288K, used 107602K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
   the space 524288K, 20% used [0x64950000, 0x6b2649f8, 0x6b264a00, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26033K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
   the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bc7a8, 0x862bc800, 0x88950000)
761.941: [DefNew: 419456K->419456K(471872K), 0.0000370 secs]761.941: [Tenured: 107602K->109018K(524288K), 1.2185450 secs] 527058K->109018K(996160K) Heap after GC invocations=76:
Heap
def new generation total 471872K, used 0K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 0% used [0x44950000, 0x44950000, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K, 0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to space 52416K, 0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation total 524288K, used 109018K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
the space 524288K, 20% used [0x64950000, 0x6b3c6960, 0x6b3c6a00, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26033K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bc7a8, 0x862bc800, 0x88950000)
} , 1.2193330 secs]
777.527: [GC {Heap before GC invocations=76:
Heap
def new generation   total 471872K, used 419456K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 100% used [0x44950000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K,   0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to   space 52416K,   0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation   total 524288K, used 109018K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
   the space 524288K, 20% used [0x64950000, 0x6b3c6960, 0x6b3c6a00, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26034K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
   the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bc998, 0x862bca00, 0x88950000)
777.527: [DefNew: 419456K->419456K(471872K), 0.0000390 secs]777.527: [Tenured: 109018K->93469K(524288K), 1.4284740 secs] 528474K->93469K(996160K) Heap after GC invocations=77:
Heap
def new generation total 471872K, used 0K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 0% used [0x44950000, 0x44950000, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K, 0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to space 52416K, 0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation total 524288K, used 93469K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
the space 524288K, 17% used [0x64950000, 0x6a497778, 0x6a497800, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26032K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bc1a8, 0x862bc200, 0x88950000)
} , 1.4292680 secs]
Thanks for your help,
David

Files Uploaded using Mapped Drive (UNC) to SharePoint Document library Putting a copy in Recycle Bin , odd SharePoint Behaviour

Hello All,
One of my client reported a strange behaviour.
Client mapped SharePoint document library to local share(UNC, NetWork Map Drive). Opened MS Word on local machine ,saved it to the share on his local machine. The document is saved successfully to SharePoint document library. But at the same time he can
see a file with same name in Recycle bin and the size of the document in Recycle bin is <1k.
Does any one know whether it is expected behaviour, why SharePoint putting this 1k file in Recycle bin?
I tried the same thing on my Dev Environment for both SharePoint 2010 and 2013, in both environments the behaviour is same as my client experience.
I have seen in forums some other people also experiencing this odd behaviour, but no one knows why.
any info on this much appreciated.
Regards,
Andrew

Hi Andrew,
i tried in my environment for 2010 and 2013. The issue doesn't occur.
Here is what i did.
1, Create a new mapped drive(\\servername\DavWWWRoot\Shared Documents) for document library
2, New a Word doc and input some string, save in the mapped drive.
3, The doc exists in the document library, but no file in Recycle Bin.
Did i miss something?
Regards,
Tom
Microsoft Online Community Support
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to
other community members reading the thread.

Odd Query behaviour

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for