Odd sync behaviour
Here's an odd thing - when I connect the Touch iTunes opens and syncs automatically as it is set to do. Some of the playlists of music will recopy to the iPod each time, but others don't. The playlists haven't been changed, but each time they will recopy as if they are new. The only difference between these and the ones that don't is that these have had lyrics added by MPFreaker, whilst the classical music in the lists that don't resync haven't. If I click the box to manage music and videos manually, then each time I want to change even one thing this set of playlists recopy again. Any thoughts?
Chris
Answers..
are Yes Yes and I see the last record process stored in the xmldata object. All looks good from IDM.
I have located the problem and it is outside IDM control. I think our Sync Policy is correct.
This database Table is being modified in a very crude manner. It seems that once per minute (faster than our AS poll loop interval) there is a 3rd party system which pushes any 'changes' into the table from a .csv file. THIS process doesnt do any diff or compares first, it simply writes what it has in the file to the table hence changing the timestamps GRRRRRRRRRR lazy b*sterds, and this is causing IDM AS to spin round and round constantly.
Thankyou for your help. It helped us eliminate IDM as culprit.
oh and its an MS SQL table and the "timestamp" is a sort of insertion counter, the higher the number the later the data has been created/updated.
The message really is in the medium.
GF
Similar Messages
-
10.6.5 update - 27" iMac, Radeon 5750 odd graphics behaviours?
I updated my new iMac 27" to OS 10.6.5 today and have seen some odd graphics behaviours.
1. Dock icon for Activity Monitor becomes transparent. Running AM, hidden showing CPU history
2. White rectangle at bottom of expanding folder (list view)
3. OK Button blue/white check mark pattern when configuring VPN. GUI feels "slow"
I updated using the Software Update tool; noticed these issues and re-updated using the Combo Installer; no change.
Any ideas or suggestions? Is this just me? I have a MacBook -- no probems at all!N Gallagher,
I had the problem earluer, but it got far worse with 10.6.5, however, I fixed it by updating my wacom tablet driver.
It wasn't the system update, but an old driver causing the problem.
Resetting PRAM, SMC and permissions and all the other standard drivel people post is nice sentiments, but it should be clear that the problem is something else because that solution hasn't solved the problem for anyone.
I have the sneaky suspicion that it's old flash and old drivers for most people.
See my original post here: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=12570261#12570261
BUT. If you have a Wacom tablet, for to their website and download the latest driver from September 10, 2010.
That's all it took for all my graphics problems to go away. -
Odd software behaviour Lumia 720
I'm the proud owner of a Lumia 720 since July. I'm facing some odd software behaviour recently though. Without notice or any pattern, the current app changes to another one, sometimes four or five times while my phone vibrates like mad. It happens two, or three times a week, and there's no significant pattern but this weird "phone on speed" behaviour always ends in the Bing app. I thought rebooting was the answer but it doesn't. Does someone has any clue?
Ugura,
Thanks for your reply. I adjusted the touch sensitivity but that did not do the trick. Last night, I was already sleeping, suddenly my Lumina 720 played a song that I played before many weeks ago. That was quite odd too. With my phone connected to the charger, me asleep and there was that terrible noise from an old U2-song... And I could not stop it, nor could I lower the volume so I had to turn on my computer to find the keys to a soft reset and it was in the middle of the night.
So I waited till this morning to reset my phone to it's factory-settings. Much to my annoyance- without any external app loaded, the phone went on nuts again. This time, while vibrating taking numerous screen shots... It's like my phone is haunted. A little poltergeist in it. I need some high-tec exorcism I'm afraid.
Hope someone can help me further! -
I deleted TV shows on my Apple TV, and then later reinstalled some of them (via iTunes sync).
I upgraded the Apple TV software, but still have these odd problems:
Sometimes all the shows I used to have shows on A TV. Sometimes only a recent additions.
Sometimes old ones play, sometimes they don't.
Sometimes a show will pause frequently for no reason.
When I sync with iTunes, it will start over and over again, syncing the same shows.
What to do?I get similar behaviour from mine. Here's what I think is happening:
- I've set up my Apple TV to 'Custom Sync' and to not sync all podcasts, only ones I select.
- Then I download some podcast episodes direct on my Apple TV, from a podcast that iTunes doesn't know about yet.
- Next time I sync, the new episode gets transferred from my AppleTV to my iMac
BUT
The new podcast is shown UNSELECTED (checkbox not ticked) in the list of podcasts to sync to the AppleTV
- So then when iTunes syncs, it thinks that you don't want that new podcast on the AppleTV (because the checkbox isn't ticked under 'Podcasts'), so it removes it.
When iTunes transfers a new podcast from the AppleTV, the sensible default would be to add it and automatically assume you want it synced.
Even better - just let me sync some stuff and manually manage other stuff. I've got more HDD space on my AppleTV than on my Mac and I can see it becoming a pain when I want more podcasts on my ATV than I can fit on my Mac. -
Syncing behaviour/direction of individual content type in iTunes
Hi fellows. I wish to clarify my understanding of how iTunes sync (overwrite) the individual content type on an iPod. The scenario is: when I sync an iPod with another new library, typically we will be prompted with the warning message, "+this iPod is currently synced with another library. If you choose to sync it with this library, all the existing content will be replaced with the content on this library+" (or some similar warning). My doubts are as follows:
Qn1. Am I right to say that, even if I click "okay" to that warning message above, the actual "replacing" +doesn't start immediately+ as iTunes will wait for the user to select what subset of content he wants, & more importantly, for the user to click the "sync" button (near the bottom right of iTunes) before the actual erasing and replacing begins?
Qn2. Does iTunes treat each content type as separate libraries, i.e. in the context of "approving" iTunes's demand to overwrite the existing content on the iPod with content from iTunes own, current library, if the "sync" checkbox on the other content type's tab is unchecked, will that existing content type stored on the iPod be excluded from the erasing and replacing?
I understand this may be very confusing, so allow me to illustrate my question with a specific example:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v489/ralliart12/blog180610/iTunes%20library%20revisit/initially_unchked_for_unpairedipod.png
If I choose to sync music from the current iTunes library to an iPod that was previously synced with another library, and I approved iTunes to go ahead and replace the existing music on the iPod with the music from the iTunes library but I have the "Sync Apps" checkbox unchecked, will the apps +on the iPod+ be wiped? Similarly, if the "sync movies" checkbox on the Movie tab is unchecked, will the movies on the iPod be wiped when I allow iTunes to replace the music library on the iPod with the songs from iTunes?
Qn2a. If iTunes treat syncing each content type libraries on their own, are music and movies treated as one library?
Qn2b. What determines the initial "checked/unchecked" status of each of those check-boxes in the diagram above when an iPod that is synced with another library, is connected to iTunes for the first time?
In fact (this paragraph is not a qn; just a comment) I find the manner in which this is handled in iTunes to be inelegant. E.g. suppose in the context of qn2 iTunes treat all content type libraries as one unified library, and once I give iTunes the permission to erase the songs on the iPod with the songs from its current library but say I don't wanna replace the apps on the iPod with the apps from this iTunes library; neither do I wish to replace the podcasts on the iPod with the podcasts on this iTunes library. I can goto the "Apps" tab and uncheck "Sync Apps", but I could not goto the "Podcasts" tab and uncheck "Sync podcasts" without committing/applying the updated aps syncing conditions first. So if the "Sync podcasts" checkbox was checked for some reason, the podcatss on the iPod will be replaced with podcasts from the iTunes library without my "permission".
For those who are veterans with this sync-ing behaviour stuff, I sincerely hope to gain some insight as to how iTunes behaves (in these contexts above). Thanks n advance.I'm going to duck out of giving you a definitive answer on the grounds that I don't really know and I don't have the resources or time to check the details. However I may still have something to offer. As you've observed the process is more than a little obscure, but the safest option is to assume that if you attempt to move your device from syncing with one library to syncing with another you will lose all the existing media content on the device.
The exact details will ultimately depend on the type of device. For example, while many can be *manually managed* with more than one library the iPhone (and I think the Shuffle) can only take content from one library even in this mode. More particularly when you manually add content to an iPhone every file that you have on the device will be compared with it's "original" in your library and if there isn't a matching file the one on the device will be removed. In contrast on a "synced" iPod Classic you could (not that it's a good idea) remove larger physical files such as movies once they've been synced to the device and, although iTunes might issue a warning, it will not remove the existing files as long as there are still coresponding entries in the library.
With the exception of the transfer of purchased content all sync operations are strictly library to device. iTunes will have a good go at throwing away your data given half a chance. For this reason I strongly urge that you make backups of your library and media files and certainly never rely on the device to hold the only copy of any of your precious files.
It's not clear why you want this information, but if you're determined to tease out the finer details then it shouldn't be too hard for you to create a number of small distinct test libraries and actually try it out for yourself. If the issue is that you simply want the freedom to update your device from more than one computer then this is perfectly feasible. Simply put your entire library on an external (preferably host powered) usb drive and take it with you. I take one further step and sync my library with my local drive at each end using SyncToy 2.1 so that I end up with 3 mutual backups for the same library, one at home, one at work, and the one I carry between them. I can open any of the three libraries on my PCs or connect the portable version to any computer running the same build of iTunes to update any of my devices without losing any content.
tt2 -
Odd SocketPermission behaviour
Hi,
I've been trying to use SocketPermissions to restrict the IP addresses from which a ServerSocket will accept a connection and am getting some wierd behaviour.
The ServerSocket will reject and close the first connection attempt from a disallowed address. Subsequent connections from the same host (using telnet) are not rejected/accepted or closed - they just 'hang there'.
The SecurityManager is also really slow at deciding whether a connection can be accepted or rejected.
Is this usual ? Or is there a way to setup SecurityManager to behave 'nicely' ?
regards
Tony SeebregtsJust spent about an hour playing around with various things and now it seems to have resolved itself. Odd... Marking this topic as answered now.
-
Running mavericks 10.9.2 have noticed a small quirk in the behaviour on one of my installs.
Selecting a group of images (mostly jpegs, sometimes tiffs) and opening quicklook. scrollling through
and quite randomly some of the images will momentarily flash up then turn blank, if you cycle through to the start and continue
sometimes those that didn't show, will show and vice versa. if you select the grid option then all will show.
all images are in either sRGB or RGB in the most part 8 bit, and all without layers or alpha channels.
there is another hard drive on my machine that has the same version of mavericks
and does not display this behaviour
I have also removed the quick look preferences from the users library and restarted but the behaviour continues.
so i was wondering if anyone has come across this and if they have any ideas as to why this might be happening
any known issues with third party apps etc.
any advice would be gratefully received
thanks in advance.Just spent about an hour playing around with various things and now it seems to have resolved itself. Odd... Marking this topic as answered now.
-
okay, consider the following example:
public class Oops {
public static void main(String args[]){
1: String oops;
2: return;
3: System.out.println(oops);
}we get compile error at 3 saying unreachable statement .. fair enough.
now, consider this:
public class Oops {
public static void main(String args[]){
1: String oops;
2: if(true) return;
3: System.out.println(oops);
}we have modified two and now there is no errors whats-so-ever.
However, the odd behaviour hecomes obvious if we comment out line 2 where we will get "variable oops might not have been initialized." ... so it would seem that it can recognize that if(true) return; will not let the program reach 3 and hence doesn't care if oops is initialized but why don't we get a similiar error as in example one?I don't see anything bizarre about this question. What
are you referring to?Perhaps 'bizarre' was a poor choice of words. It's just that I recall silkm posting a rather similar question before (a question about how the compiler/jvm handles thing rather than what API can one use to make foo.
No, that's not a possibility. The JLS explains exactly
why this behavior occurs:
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/
tatements.doc.html#236365
The reason that the second example compiles is so that
you can have code that is conditionally compiled such
as debugging statements. It's not bizarre at all, it's
entirely pragmatic and practical.Yes, of course, makes sense. (Although the possibility of a compiler optimizing it out is flashed there.) -
Ok, I just managed to get my old Dell D610 replaced, but this new laptop has some odd behaviour with some Solman transactions. I can get into Solman Web Workcenter no problem, but when I try to open SOAMANAGER, I get one blank IE8 window (looks like it's supposed to be hidden), and then a few seconds later a second normal looking IE8 window opens, with a partial URL. This appears to be a problem with my local profile - I can log in to someone else's machine and it'll work, and a coworker can log into my laptop and it'll also work.
This is the URL it directs the second window to.. https://<server>.<domain>.com/sap/public/myssocntl?sap-client=100
whereas this is where it should be going. https://<server.domain>.com/sap/bc/webdynpro/sap/appl_soap_management?sap-client=100&sap-language=EN
Anyone have any ideas here? If I call my help desk they're going to be clueless on this one.. lol..
thanks.
bkMaybe you can rename your home folder in c:\documents and settings and login again - thereby recreating your local profile.
-
With our application deployed to a client, we have been experiencing some odd behaviour with JMS in Oracle 10g (OC4J 9.0.4).
The application posts multiple non-transactional messages (roughly 400-500Kb per message) to a queue, which an MDB processes correctly everywhere but the client site. At the client site, only the first message in retrieved from the queue by the MDB, as if to suggest the queue was only capable of holding one message and the other messages are not being added or are being dumped. No exceptions are being thrown, which isn't helpnig diagnose the problem.
The client site has a similar environment to our internal dev/qa environments - Red Hat AS 3.0 server, v1.4.2 jvm, same OC4J and application config.
Has anyone else experienced this kind of behaviour with JMS?Just spent about an hour playing around with various things and now it seems to have resolved itself. Odd... Marking this topic as answered now.
-
Odd gmail behaviour when using mail.app
Hello there,
Ever since upgrading to Mavericks, I've been experiencing odd behaviour when sending messages from my gmail account in mail.app. I send a message and up to ten copies of the message appear in mail.app's trash.
Does anyone know what might be the cause of this?
many thanks,
Chidithis is a setting in gmail that interfer with mail.app
the setting is that mail.app is that when you type a mail it will auto save it while you are typing. and gmail will delete the saved onece and the mail.app will create a new all the time
duno how to turn this off, try by rebuilding the mailbox in mail.app -
I've upgraded to itunes11 on my mac and I'm now seeing some strange behaviour in the sync settings for apps. My phone is currently running and has 4.9GB available however when I try to sync I'm getting warnings that I need and additional 4.19GB despite the coloured bar at the bottom saying 4.72GB free.
In addition to this, there are a number of apps that are currenly installed that have a "remove" status next to them. If I click the remove button it changes to "will remove". Likewise there are some apps that I don't want on my phone that now can only be changed between install/will install.
Please can anyone explain what's going on???I have a similar experience, very frustrating.
It seems like apps in the iTunes library that are not on your iPhone have an "install" tab. They are not supposed to be installed on the phone unless you click on the button to switch from "install" to "will install". The "remove/will remove" tabs are supposed to behave similarly. All apps on your phone have a "remove" tab in iTunes. If you want to remove them from the phone, click to switch the tab to "will remove".
That's all good in theory, but it doesn't really work well. The first time I synced my iPhone under iTunes11, I got lost of apps I didn't want, which never happened under iTunes10. (I keep everything I ever bought on my computer).
They thought they made it more explicit than iTunes 10, which only had check/uncheck boxes next to apps, but they actually (slightly) screwed up. -
Hi all,
I m using 10gr2 (10.2.0.4.0) database as standalone and using oracle lite r3 (10.3.0.2)
I have an application created with oracle branch office platform.
I downloaded a client in a mobile device and started doing data entry.
I made an entry in parent table and also made a corresponding entry in the child table.
The parent table is non-sync able table.
And also i did some updates in some sync able tables
Now i did a normal sync. Sync was success in the client side.
As the parent entry was not created in the server, i got an error “parent key not found”.
Now all the records will be in error queue until i clear the error.
Now, I didn’t clear the error.
Scenario 1:
Without doing any DML operations in the ODB which i synced earlier, i synced again.
The sync was success in the client side.
In the synced ODB, I noticed that all the records which i inserted earlier got deleted and also the updates which I made were not there.
The updates were changed like how its currently present in the server.
Scenario 2:
In this scenario, I did some updates in some other tables (different from previously updated tables) in the ODB which i synced earlier.
Now I did a normal sync. The sync was success in the client side.
When I checked in the server, the updates which I made now were reflected in the server.
When I checked in the ODB, the updates which I made now were unchanged and so the previous inserts and updates.
Can someone explain how oracle lite behaves in the above mentioned scenarios?
Thanks in advance for ur help.
Regards,
Prasnnaa.The standard behaviour for fast refresh publication items is
a) data created/updated on the client
1) the sync process copies the changed data from the client database and creates a packed binary file
2) file uploaded to the server and unpacked into the cfm$ tables (in queue) with 'header' data in c$in_messages
3) any new changes waiting in the cmp$ (out queue tables) for the client are extracted into a packed file
4) packed file of server changes downloaded and applied to the client database
NOTE no data removed from the client unless a delete was sent from the server out queue
5) at some point the server MGP apply process will run, and this takes the in queue data and attempts to write to the server tables
6) if this is sucessful the in queue tables are purged, if not the data is copied to the error queue
7) if the apply was successful, then the triggers on the tables updated during the apply will fire, logging the data for the compose process
8) MGP compose process runs, finds all server side changed data and builds the out queue for the next sync
9) in the next sync 'acknowledgement' updates will be sent to the client for previously uploaded data (if the data no longer meets the selection criteria, for example status=ACTIVE , this is the point at which it gets deleted)
b) data data created/updated on the server
1) the data updates cause the triggers to fire, logging the records for processing by the MGP process
2) the MGP compose process usees the logged records and builds the out queue
3) changes downloaded when the user next synchronises (NOTE the data will only be available if the client sync is AFTER the MGP compose process)
for complete refresh items
1) data upload from client
2) all data matching the selection is downloaded in real time
3) client table cleared
4) client table rebuild with the new download
The difference in behaviour, and the process delay whilst waiting for the MGP process is done, is the reason newly created data can temporarily get removed from the client, and put back once applied to the server
There is a third type of publication item that works in real time on both upload and download, but this is more complex to use -
Hi,
I'm working on a web application (Jetty, running inside JBoss 3.2.1, Redhat Linux, dual Xeon CPUs, hotspot 1.4.2_04 or sometimes 1.4.2_05) whose gc behaviour seems rather odd. I have been watching visualgc while the application is under load and have observed the following:
Using the default collector:
* I have turned off explicit GCs
* Eden is about 400M and is collected whenever it fills up. Under the load test I've been looking at this occurs about every 30 seconds This collection occurs very quickly (normally a few milliseconds). There will normally be around 2M of garbage at the end of that collection which goes straight into the old generation (maybe via s0 and s1, depending on the settings I'm using)
* The old generation is also about 400M. However, collections of the old generation happen almost every time that a collection Eden occurs, even though the old generation is very far from full. (In the test I've been looking it seems to have a "steady state" of around 100M). Collections of old take a relatively long time, normally around 1 or 2 seconds. This is an unacceptably long time for our application.
This seems very odd to me as I wouldn't expect the old generation to be collected every time Eden fills up. For our application it would be perfectly acceptable for the old generation to fill up slowly each time Eden is collected, and then for one big GC to occur once that filled up (which would once every hour or two). But re-collecting the same bit of memory in the old generation twice a minute (at a couple of times per minute) is just no good. I don't understand why the old generation is collected whenever Eden is collected.
I have tried the concurrent old-generation collector and this only made the problem worse. I also tried setting the old-generation threshold for the concurrent collector to 90% and this made no different - the old generation was still collected every time that Eden filled up.
Strangely enough, when using the parallel (high throughput) collector for Eden, the problem almost went away. I say "almost" because although no collections occured in the old generation occurred until the old generation had filled completely, the very first old generation collection (which sent it back to its "natural" 100M ") seemed to send it back to its old habits: an old generation collection for every Eden collection.
Does anybody have any idea what might be going on? Could there be something weird about our application? Am I missing some crucial GC option? Have I stumbled across a GC bug? Do I just not understand hwo this stuff all works?
Any pointers much appreciated, thanks for your time.
DavidHi,
Thanks for responding.
I started the vm with the following options:
-Dsun.net.client.defaultConnectTimeout=15000 -Dsun.net.client.defaultReadTimeout=15000 -XX:+DisableExplicitGC -XX:+UsePerfData -Xmn512m -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m -XX:PermSize=64m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -XX:MaxTenuringThreshold=0 -XX:+PrintHeapAtGC -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps -XX:+PrintGCDetails -XX:+PrintTenuringDistribution
(Note that I've set -XX:MaxTenuringThreshold=0 for this test so I could reproduce the problem more quickly. If I set it to something smaller then the problem still occurs, just less frequently).
I've got loads and loads of output from the GC trace (I ran a load test on it) so I'll just include an excerpt containing some of the full GCs that I am not expecting. Watching the proceedings in visualgc, I noted that most of the GCs I've included below involved a collection of the old generation (for reasons I cannot fathom). However, they are not noted as "Full GC" in the trace. Any help in understanding this much appreciated:
722.391: [GC {Heap before GC invocations=72:
Heap
def new generation total 471872K, used 419455K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 99% used [0x44950000, 0x5e2efff8, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K, 0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
to space 52416K, 0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
tenured generation total 524288K, used 103760K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
the space 524288K, 19% used [0x64950000, 0x6aea4338, 0x6aea4400, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26031K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bbdb0, 0x862bbe00, 0x88950000)
722.392: [DefNew
Desired survivor size 26836992 bytes, new threshold 0 (max 0)
: 419455K->0K(471872K), 0.0272900 secs] 523216K->105143K(996160K) Heap after GC invocations=73:
Heap
def new generation total 471872K, used 0K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 0% used [0x44950000, 0x44950000, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K, 0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to space 52416K, 0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation total 524288K, used 105143K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
the space 524288K, 20% used [0x64950000, 0x6affdfc8, 0x6affe000, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26031K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bbdb0, 0x862bbe00, 0x88950000)
} , 0.0280260 secs]
734.030: [GC {Heap before GC invocations=73:
Heap
def new generation total 471872K, used 419456K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 100% used [0x44950000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K, 0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to space 52416K, 0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation total 524288K, used 105143K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
the space 524288K, 20% used [0x64950000, 0x6affdfc8, 0x6affe000, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26033K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bc538, 0x862bc600, 0x88950000)
734.031: [DefNew: 419456K->419456K(471872K), 0.0000370 secs]734.031: [Tenured: 105143K->106385K(524288K), 1.2275840 secs] 524599K->106385K(996160K) Heap after GC invocations=74:
Heap
def new generation total 471872K, used 0K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 0% used [0x44950000, 0x44950000, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K, 0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to space 52416K, 0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation total 524288K, used 106385K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
the space 524288K, 20% used [0x64950000, 0x6b134458, 0x6b134600, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26033K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bc538, 0x862bc600, 0x88950000)
} , 1.2283850 secs]
747.317: [GC {Heap before GC invocations=74:
Heap
def new generation total 471872K, used 419455K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 99% used [0x44950000, 0x5e2efff0, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K, 0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to space 52416K, 0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation total 524288K, used 106385K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
the space 524288K, 20% used [0x64950000, 0x6b134458, 0x6b134600, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26033K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bc718, 0x862bc800, 0x88950000)
747.317: [DefNew: 419455K->419455K(471872K), 0.0000380 secs]747.317: [Tenured: 106385K->107602K(524288K), 1.2445540 secs] 525841K->107602K(996160K) Heap after GC invocations=75:
Heap
def new generation total 471872K, used 0K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 0% used [0x44950000, 0x44950000, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K, 0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to space 52416K, 0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation total 524288K, used 107602K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
the space 524288K, 20% used [0x64950000, 0x6b2649f8, 0x6b264a00, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26033K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bc718, 0x862bc800, 0x88950000)
} , 1.2453910 secs]
761.940: [GC {Heap before GC invocations=75:
Heap
def new generation total 471872K, used 419456K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 100% used [0x44950000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K, 0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to space 52416K, 0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation total 524288K, used 107602K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
the space 524288K, 20% used [0x64950000, 0x6b2649f8, 0x6b264a00, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26033K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bc7a8, 0x862bc800, 0x88950000)
761.941: [DefNew: 419456K->419456K(471872K), 0.0000370 secs]761.941: [Tenured: 107602K->109018K(524288K), 1.2185450 secs] 527058K->109018K(996160K) Heap after GC invocations=76:
Heap
def new generation total 471872K, used 0K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 0% used [0x44950000, 0x44950000, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K, 0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to space 52416K, 0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation total 524288K, used 109018K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
the space 524288K, 20% used [0x64950000, 0x6b3c6960, 0x6b3c6a00, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26033K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bc7a8, 0x862bc800, 0x88950000)
} , 1.2193330 secs]
777.527: [GC {Heap before GC invocations=76:
Heap
def new generation total 471872K, used 419456K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 100% used [0x44950000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K, 0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to space 52416K, 0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation total 524288K, used 109018K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
the space 524288K, 20% used [0x64950000, 0x6b3c6960, 0x6b3c6a00, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26034K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bc998, 0x862bca00, 0x88950000)
777.527: [DefNew: 419456K->419456K(471872K), 0.0000390 secs]777.527: [Tenured: 109018K->93469K(524288K), 1.4284740 secs] 528474K->93469K(996160K) Heap after GC invocations=77:
Heap
def new generation total 471872K, used 0K [0x44950000, 0x64950000, 0x64950000)
eden space 419456K, 0% used [0x44950000, 0x44950000, 0x5e2f0000)
from space 52416K, 0% used [0x61620000, 0x61620000, 0x64950000)
to space 52416K, 0% used [0x5e2f0000, 0x5e2f0000, 0x61620000)
tenured generation total 524288K, used 93469K [0x64950000, 0x84950000, 0x84950000)
the space 524288K, 17% used [0x64950000, 0x6a497778, 0x6a497800, 0x84950000)
compacting perm gen total 65536K, used 26032K [0x84950000, 0x88950000, 0x8c950000)
the space 65536K, 39% used [0x84950000, 0x862bc1a8, 0x862bc200, 0x88950000)
} , 1.4292680 secs]
Thanks for your help,
David -
Hello All,
One of my client reported a strange behaviour.
Client mapped SharePoint document library to local share(UNC, NetWork Map Drive). Opened MS Word on local machine ,saved it to the share on his local machine. The document is saved successfully to SharePoint document library. But at the same time he can
see a file with same name in Recycle bin and the size of the document in Recycle bin is <1k.
Does any one know whether it is expected behaviour, why SharePoint putting this 1k file in Recycle bin?
I tried the same thing on my Dev Environment for both SharePoint 2010 and 2013, in both environments the behaviour is same as my client experience.
I have seen in forums some other people also experiencing this odd behaviour, but no one knows why.
any info on this much appreciated.
Regards,
AndrewHi Andrew,
i tried in my environment for 2010 and 2013. The issue doesn't occur.
Here is what i did.
1, Create a new mapped drive(\\servername\DavWWWRoot\Shared Documents) for document library
2, New a Word doc and input some string, save in the mapped drive.
3, The doc exists in the document library, but no file in Recycle Bin.
Did i miss something?
Regards,
Tom
Microsoft Online Community Support
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to
other community members reading the thread.
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to write to weblogic.log from JSP ?
It is possible to write some messages to weblogic.log from JSP?
-
I recently downloaded the 3.1.3 update for my 1st generation iPod touch (better late then never huh?), and the update was going fine, until it came to restoring the iPod settings. The progress bar on the iPod got about a sixth of the way up and then
-
Exception during ADS deplopyment
hi I am trying to deploy the famous tutorial app OnlineInteractiveForm. Althugh we have installed the .pfx file yesterday When I deploy the app I get the following exception: com.sap.tc.webdynpro.pdfobject.core.PDFObjectRuntimeException: Processing e
-
Parsing Idocscript Variables in XML
I would like to parse Idocscript variables inside a regular xml file. When I say regular I really mean a non "Data File" from within Site Studio. Below is a snippet of the xml file I'm using. As you can see, I am trying to use the [!--$ssServerRelati
-
How can I set up a series of pdfs in a folder so that text from a text field (such as a name) on one pdf will populate the same text field on other pdfs in a folder?