ODSEE Connector Patch ID request

Hello Everyone
We are using LDAP connector 11.1.1.6 version in OIM 11.2.2. The target is SunOne and we are using it in ODSEE format.
Now, we are seeing a problem where even if the user is disabled in target and if we run 'LDAP Trusted Reconciliation' the user is not getting disabled in OIM. All the required attributes - enabledAttribute, enabledValue, disabledValue and enabledWhenNoAttribute are all set correctly.
After a research, my colleague told me that there is a patch for this bug. Can someone tell me the bug number or patch number of this solution or any other info which is helpful to me?
Thanking You in advance.
Sandeep

Not very sure but just check whether latest BP fixes your issue.
Bundle Patch Number : 11.1.2.2.5
My Oracle Support Patch Number : Patch:19718347 (Release Date: 20-Jan-2015). This is a Suite Bundle Patch with OIM OPatch Version # 19787058.
~J
Please mark the response as helpful or correct when appropriate to make it easier for others to find it

Similar Messages

Windows 2000 connector Patch issue (Patch ID: 8318738)

Hi,
We have applied the latest Windows 2000 connector Patch on our DEV environment.
While trying to provision the Windows resource (the user’s home network shared folder), effectively there is some permissions issue that is encountered while executing in the DLL and it effectively causes some page fault that prompts the OS to kill the process and the OC4J instance is restarted.
FYI..
10/01/11 01:26:17 Running GETUSERANDPERMISSIONS
10/01/11 01:26:17 Target Class = com.thortech.xl.util.adapters.tcUtilStringOperations
10/01/11 01:26:17 Running GETGRANTUSERPERMISSIONS
10/01/11 01:26:17 Target Class = com.thortech.xl.util.adapters.tcUtilStringOperations
10/01/11 01:26:17 Running GETPERMCOMMANDANDFOLDERPATH
10/01/11 01:26:17 Target Class = com.thortech.xl.util.adapters.tcUtilStringOperations
10/01/11 01:26:17 Running GETFULLGRANTUSERSHARECOMMAND
10/01/11 01:26:17 Target Class = com.thortech.xl.util.adapters.tcUtilStringOperations
10/01/11 01:26:17 Running EXECUTEGRANTUSERFOLDERPERMISSIONSCOMMAND
10/01/11 01:26:17 Target Class = com.thortech.xl.integration.WindowsNT40.tcUtilWindowsNT40
Entering method runRemoteCommand
szAdminName is =:OIMADMIN
szDomainName is =:dev.abc.com
szCommand is =:cmd /c cacls %home%\user70065 /E /P User70065:C 2>C:\WINDOWS\system32\windowsConnectorError.txt
temp is \\hou016.dev.abc.com\root\cimv2
connecting to server
# An unexpected error has been detected by HotSpot Virtual Machine:
# EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) at pc=0x695befe7, pid=2212, tid=4184
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (1.5.0_06-b05 mixed mode)
# Problematic frame:
# C [tcWindowsNT40.dll+0x1efe7]
# An error report file with more information is saved as hs_err_pid2212.log
# If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
# http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp
10/01/11 01:26:20 Start process
WARNING: Code-source D:\product\OASDev_2\j2ee\halOIM\applications\Xellerate\soap.jar (from manifest of /D:/product/OASDev_2/j2ee/halOIM/applications/Xellerate/xlGenConnector.jar) has the same filename but is not identical to /D:/product/OASDev_2/webservices/lib/soap.jar (from <code-source> (ignore manifest Class-Path) in META-INF/boot.xml in D:\product\OASDev_2\j2ee\home\oc4j.jar). If it contains different versions of the same classes, it will be masked as the latter is already visible in the search path of loader Xellerate.root:0.0.0.
WARNING: Code-source D:\product\OASDev_2\j2ee\halOIM\applications\Xellerate\http_client.jar (from manifest of /D:/product/OASDev_2/j2ee/halOIM/applications/Xellerate/xlGenConnector.jar) has the same filename but is not identical to /D:/product/OASDev_2/j2ee/home/lib/http_client.jar (from <code-source> (ignore manifest Class-Path) in META-INF/boot.xml in D:\product\OASDev_2\j2ee\home\oc4j.jar). If it contains different versions of the same classes, it will be masked as the latter is already visible in the search path of loader Xellerate.root:0.0.0.
WARNING: Code-source D:\product\OASDev_2\j2ee\halOIM\applications\Xellerate\xlWebApp\WEB-INF\lib\share.jar (from WEB-INF/lib/ directory in D:\product\OASDev_2\j2ee\halOIM\applications\Xellerate\xlWebApp\WEB-INF\lib) has the same filename but is not identical to /D:/product/OASDev_2/jlib/share.jar (from <code-source> in /D:/product/OASDev_2/j2ee/halOIM/config/server.xml). If it contains different versions of the same classes, it will be masked as the latter is already visible in the search path of loader Xellerate.web.xlWebApp:0.0.0.
10/01/11 01:26:38
GMS: address is HOUOIM602V:4079
WARNING: Code-source D:\product\OASDev_2\j2ee\halOIM\applications\Xellerate\xlScheduler\WEB-INF\lib\xlScheduler.jar (from WEB-INF/lib/ directory in D:\product\OASDev_2\j2ee\halOIM\applications\Xellerate\xlScheduler\WEB-INF\lib) has the same filename but is not identical to /D:/product/OASDev_2/j2ee/halOIM/applications/Xellerate/xlScheduler.jar (from manifest of /D:/product/OASDev_2/j2ee/halOIM/applications/Xellerate/xlDataObjectBeans.jar). If it contains different versions of the same classes, it will be masked as the latter is already visible in the search path of loader Xellerate.web.xlScheduler:0.0.0.
10/01/11 01:26:42 Loading xalan.jar for XPathAPI.
10/01/11 01:26:43 Nexaweb Technologies Inc.(C)2000-2004. All Rights Reserved.
10/01/11 01:26:43 Nexaweb Technologies Inc.
10/01/11 01:26:43 10 Canal Park
10/01/11 01:26:43 Cambridge, MA 02141
Any one of you faced a similar issue if you also happend to apply this patch? Please suggest if you interpret any other issue from the logs.
Thanks in advance.

Guys,
Any Help on this Issue?

AD Connector Patch 11.1.1.5.0A (AD connector patch 14190610)

hi all,
I am having OIM 11gR2 (11.1.2.0).
I have a confusion about applying patch for AD connector 11.1.1.5.0.
I need to know that in the Patch download zip file (AD connector patch 14190610) there are many folders that are same as available in AD connector 11.1.5.0, in the read me file for this patch there is no mentioning of what to do with the rest of the folders, its only saying
*"1)On the Target where connector server is Installed.*
*Unzip the content of the bundle ActiveDirectory.Connector-1.1.0.6380.zip to the folder where Connector server is installed."*
on the connector download page
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/id-mgmt/downloads/connectors-101674.html
for AD connector mentioned is that
*"Please apply AD connector patch 14190610 after downloading from MOS (My Oracle Support) if you are using this connector against OIM 11.1.2.0 or above."*
So it means that its a patch only not the full connector so then what is the use of the rest of the folders (configuration, dataset, owglue, resources,upgrade, xml) provided in that patch zip file other then the "bundle ActiveDirectory.Connector-1.1.0.6380.zip"
Do we need to run the "Upgrade Connector" after the installation of Connector 11.1.1.5.0 ?
any comments
Thanks...

Hi,
Even I couldn't find one, so I guess there isn't one. So, what I did was install new connector server in the same windows box running on different port and switched the OIM configuration to use it. My environment is running fine after this change.
Regards,
Sunny

Applying OIM Connector Patches

I currently have OIM 9.1 with connector version 9.0.4.1 and what to apply connector patch 7017816 to correct an issue with the AD password sync loop issue. Are there any special instructions somewhere on how to apply the patch? If I attempt to install the patch following the connector instructions on a initial install the patch breaks several adapters causing them to no longer compile.

I have seen similar issues on rare instances but neither I nor Oracle OIM support has ever been able to figure out what is causing it.
What I usually do is to delete the generated source code and then ask for a recompile in the design client This causes the source code to be regenerated which hopefully will resolve your problem.
Hope this helps
/M

OIM AD Connector Patching

I need to apply a connector patch for AD connector. I know the patch id also. Please let me know the steps for downloading this patch and applying it to the existing connector.
Edited by: 955932 on Oct 10, 2012 11:10 PM

You must have Oracle customer support identifier to login oracle support for patch download
If you have support identifier and knowing the patch ID, login into the Oracle support :
http://support.oracle.com
Finally download it from Patches section
readme will be having all the required step for patch installation.

Patch pre requests

I want to apply patch 6412999
issued the command
$>adpatch options=prereq,nocompilejps
here is the brief output
! 4712852 AD: Minipack 11i.AD.I.4
- 6412999 OWF: 1OFF:6375615:11.5.10.5:11.5.10.5:11.5.10.5:JAVA MAILER PERFORMANCE AFTER ATG RUP
Symbol Legend
!: Unapplied prerequisite patch.
This prerequisite patch must be applied together with the current patch(es).
Please merge this patch with the current patch(es) and apply them together.
-: Patch with prerequisite check information.
This patch is about to be applied.
i havent any record with bug_number 4712852 at ad_bugs table but i have a record at fnd_product_installtions which is 11i.AD.I.6 patch_level
Continue as if prerequisite patches have been applied?
yes or no
should i continue to apply patch?
any suggestion

Continue as if prerequisite patches have been applied?
yes or no
should i continue to apply patch?
any suggestionYes, you can proceed with the patch and ignore this message since you are on 11i.AD.I.6

Patch number request

Hi,
I am planning to get 10.2.0.3 64 bits patch. Can anyone please guide which one to get for Linux 64 bits server?
Please let me know.
thanks
Pat

user12020966 wrote:
I am planning to get 10.2.0.3 64 bits patch. Can anyone please guide which one to get for Linux 64 bits server?Assuming you are looking for the Patch Set that upgrades your database from 10.2.0.1 or 10.2.0.2 to 10.2.0.3, the steps, using My Oracle Support - flash site:
1) Log in to My Oracle Support (http://support.oracle.com)
2) Click on "Patches & Updates" tab
3) Click on "Product or Family (Advanced Search" link
4) Enter "RDBMS Server" for Product
5) For Release, expand "RDBMS Server" and select (check box) "10.2.0.3"
6) Ensure Platform is selected as the filter field and select "Linux x86-64" as the platform
7) Click on the circled + (right edge)
8) Select Filter "Type" and select "Patchset"
9) Click Search
In the resulting list, look at the ReadMe for each entry. The ReadME will tell you whether it's a Patch (that has probably been mis-labelled) or a Patch Set. Patch Sets, as I know them, are usually larger than the original software.

Reg_Access Request Submission Notification to GRAC_REQUESTER

Hi All,
I have an issues in SAP GRC 10.0 with respect to Notifications and variables, Currently in the Process SAP_GRAC_ACCESS_REQUEST, i have by default global notification settings which are mentioned below.
    Notification Event                              Template ID                                Recipient ID
1. END_OF_REQUEST                         GRAC_AR_CLOSE                    GRAC_USER
2. REQUEST_SUBMISSION                  GRAC_AR_SUBMIT                   GRAC_REQUESTER
Now when i try to create a change access request which is by adding roles to the user in the connector system, the request gets submitted. So because of the Request Submission Notification event , a notification is sent to the requester and notification has the text which is mentioned in the document object associated to the message class<0AC_AR_SUBMIT>. Now i have created a custom Document object <Z_GRAC_AR_SUBMIT_BODY> and assigned that to the <0AC_AR_SUBMIT> by maintaining the table GRFNVNOTIFYMSG and also have changed the subject in that.
But Now when the requester receives the notification, the subject is < Access Request Submission Notification > where as it is mentioned differently as shown below.
Where as when the requester gets the submission notification as shown below, it looks different, i mean even the first name and last name too are not coming correctly.
where as the user name maintained in the Requester's User master record is
Could you please help why there are discrepencies and also how can i know where the sender is maintained, the mail id which sends the notifcations to the users.
Thanks and Regards,
Naga.

Hi Filip,
i have found out answer to one one part.
Actually I have followed that document, and forgot to update one step, that is once i have created a custom document object thru SE61 and then we also need to assign it through SPRO-->GRC-->Access Control-->Maintain Custom Notification messages where we assign the custom document object to the message class and also we can update the sender there< from which user id's email id the notification mail should go to the requester) that is the reason why the mail is coming from GRCIDM rather than WF-BATCH...
I have one more question , when ever requester is trying to raise a change request for assigning of roles to other user, when i click on the requester link as shown below, it is showing me details of the requester which in connector system.
Note:Requester user id MARAMNA is present in both GRC system and connector system, where as it is showing me the details of connector system rather than GRC system.
Thanks and Regards,
Naga.

Receive connector anonymous or authenticate

Hi,
Does anyone know a way to set a receive connector to only request authentication in certain circumstances?
Let me explain the scenario: If you have a receive connector that is set to accept general inbound emails from anyone then it will be set to accept emails from any sender address.
However, if someone is trying to spoof the sender address and they use an email address which is valid within your organisation then it would be really useful if it could request authentication at that point, since emails from internal users should only
come from authenticated devices.
Is there any way to do this?
Thanks in advance.
Neil

Hi,
According to your description, there are spoofing emails in your environment. And as far as I know, the authentication of receive connector cannot only work in certain circumstance.
Ｈowever, I recommend the following methods to prevent emails spoofing.
1. Remove ms-Exch-SMTP-Accept-Any-Sender for anonymous users on the receive connector
2. Remove ms-Exch-SMTP-Accept-Authoritative-Domain-Sender for anonymous users on the receive connector
3. Enable Sender-ID validation on the receive connector, with a corresponding TXT (SPF) record in DNS.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff714972.aspx
4. Enable the Anti-Spam functionality on the mailbox server:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb201691(v=exchg.150).aspx
If you have any question, please feel free to let me know.
Thanks,
If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Angela Shi
TechNet Community Support

Export Patch wizard report to excel

Hi,
Is there a way to export the recommended patches list generated from the patch wizard to excel? I have tried the export to excel option but it failing.
Thanks,
Keith

OK here you go. You need the request id from submit recommend patches - so from recommended patches results page click on the request set id link and then get the Submit Analyze Patches (Wrapper) request id in.
Recommended...
select
adp.bug_number patch_name,
adp.product_family_abbreviation ,
ad_pa_validate_criteriaset.get_cs_prod_fam_abbr(adp.product_abbreviation) product_family_abbreviation,
nvl(adp.product_abbreviation, ' ') ,
adp.bug_description ,
DECODE(adp.IS_FAMILY_PACK,'Y','Family Pack')||
DECODE(adp.IS_MAINT_PACK,'Y','Maintenance Pack')||
DECODE(adp.IS_MINI_PACK,'Y','Mini Pack')||
DECODE(adp.IS_HIGH_PRIORITY,'Y','High Priority Patch',NVL(adp.patch_type,'User Request')) Patch_Type ,
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ad_pa_anal_run_bug_prereqs aparbp
WHERE adb.analysis_run_bug_id = aparbp.analysis_run_bug_id ) prereq_cnt,
DECODE (adh.bug_number, NULL, 'N', 'Y'),
adt.name ,
adb.analysis_run_id ,
analysis_run_bug_id ,
ads.snapshot_id ,
ad_pa_validate_criteriaset.get_cs_prod_fam_name(adp.product_abbreviation) product_family_name ,
appi.product_name ,
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ad_pa_anal_run_bug_codelevels aparbc
WHERE adb.analysis_run_bug_id = aparbc.analysis_run_bug_id ) level_cnt ,
decode (adb.analysis_status,'MISSING','Missing','READY','Unapplied','APPLIED','Applied',adb.analysis_status) patch_status ,
nvl(decode(adp.has_msi_steps,'Y','Yes','N','No',adp.has_msi_steps), ' ') hasMsiSteps ,
adp.baseline ,
adp.entity_abbr ,
adp.patch_id
from
ad_pm_patches adp ,
ad_appl_tops adt ,
ad_pa_analysis_run_bugs adb ,
ad_pm_product_info appi ,
ad_snapshots ads
,ad_hidden_patches adh
where
adb.analysis_run_id = 402352 --<requestid>
and adb.analysis_status in ('MISSING','READY','APPLIED')
and ads.SNAPSHOT_TYPE = 'G'
and adt.NAME ='GLOBAL'
and adb.RECOMMENDED_PATCH_TYPE in ('1','3')
and adb.appl_top_id = adt.APPL_TOP_ID
and ads.appl_top_id = adt.APPL_TOP_ID
and appi.product_abbreviation = adp.product_abbreviation
and adb.bug_number = adp.BUG_NUMBER
and adb.baseline = adp.baseline
and adp.patch_metadata_key = 'DEFAULT'
and (adp.is_high_priority = 'Y' OR adp.is_code_level='N' )
and adh.bug_number(+) = adp.BUG_NUMBER
order by patch_name
New Code ...
select
adp.bug_number patch_name,
adp.product_family_abbreviation ,
ad_pa_validate_criteriaset.get_cs_prod_fam_abbr(adp.product_abbreviation) product_family_abbreviation,
nvl(adp.product_abbreviation, ' ') ,
adp.bug_description ,
INITCAP(NVL(adp.patch_type,'User Request')) Patch_Type ,
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ad_pa_anal_run_bug_prereqs aparbp
WHERE adb.analysis_run_bug_id = aparbp.analysis_run_bug_id ) prereq_cnt,
DECODE (adh.bug_number, NULL, 'N', 'Y'),
adt.name ,
adb.analysis_run_id ,
analysis_run_bug_id ,
ads.snapshot_id ,
ad_pa_validate_criteriaset.get_cs_prod_fam_name(adp.product_abbreviation) product_family_name ,
appi.product_name ,
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ad_pa_anal_run_bug_codelevels aparbc
WHERE adb.analysis_run_bug_id = aparbc.analysis_run_bug_id ) level_cnt ,
decode (adb.analysis_status,'MISSING','Missing','READY','Unapplied','APPLIED','Applied',adb.analysis_status) patch_status ,
nvl(decode(adp.has_msi_steps,'Y','Yes','N','No',adp.has_msi_steps), ' ') hasMsiSteps ,
adp.baseline ,
adp.entity_abbr ,
adp.patch_id
from
ad_pm_patches adp ,
ad_appl_tops adt ,
ad_pa_analysis_run_bugs adb ,
ad_pm_product_info appi ,
ad_snapshots ads
,ad_hidden_patches adh
where
adb.analysis_run_id = 402352 --<request_id>
and adb.analysis_status in ('MISSING','READY','APPLIED')
and ads.SNAPSHOT_TYPE = 'G'
and adt.NAME ='GLOBAL'
and adb.appl_top_id = adt.APPL_TOP_ID
and ads.appl_top_id = adt.APPL_TOP_ID
and appi.product_abbreviation = adp.product_abbreviation
and adb.bug_number = adp.BUG_NUMBER
and adb.baseline = adp.baseline
and adp.patch_metadata_key = 'DEFAULT'
and adp.is_code_level = 'Y'
and adh.bug_number(+) = adp.BUG_NUMBER
order by patch_name

Merge 4411462 and 5073249 patches?

Performing EBS database upgrade from 9.2 to 10G:
Step 21 of note:362203.1 says to apply 9 database patches. Two of the patches in the list conflict with each other (4411462 and 5073249). How did you guys handle this? Did you skip the 5073249 patch and request a merge from Oracle and in the meantime proceed with the upgrade?

Even better, there were file conflicts with the BIS patches and the quarterly critical patch updates. Whenever I applied a CPU patch, opatch rolled back those BIS patches. After about 4 or 5 TARs, I was able to get them merged with the latest CPU build for 10.2.0.2.
For Cotober 2006 CPU, there was a super merge that merges the BIS patches with the CPU updates:
5598552 SUPER MLR FOR CPUOCT2006 ON 10.2.0.2
For January 2007 CPU, (5689957 CPU MLR patch for 10.2.0.2 on 23), 4411462 and 5073249 are listed in the bugs fixed section, and should be included in 10.2.0.2 CPU fixes going forward.

Error "One or more values could not be set" - Oracle Connector

Hey guys - I should have known there was a forum here with smart people. I'm hoping someone can shed a little light on our latest issue. When we try to invite people not within our company to a meeting, (even if they are included in our contact list/address book, etc) the error "one or more values could not be set" I'm pretty sure it's a forms error, but can't seem to resolve it. It started with the 2003 outlook service patch. I've applied every connector patch available and have searched for an answer, but can't resolve this icky problem (very crabby users) I've searched this forum but didn't see this topic. If it's already been addressed, forgive me and point me to the thread. If it hasn't and anyone has an idea, I'd appreciate some help!
Thanks
Kim

I have CRXI
First off, try verifing the database
Database,
Verifiy Database
Then if it is still broken.
Double-check all of the unlikely places in your report structure. Look at the subreport links. Look through all your formulas (including the ones for formatting). Keep in mind that Crystal doesn't have IntelliText, so you need to double-check (or even triple-check) that everything is spelled correctly.
Odds are strong that, somewhere in there, you are accidentally referencing a field that doesn't exist.

Not able to download database 11.2.0.3 - exceeded maximum permitted download requests on server

I have been trying to download database version 11.2.0.3 from the patchset a couple of times. Everytime my download gets interrupted/not complete for some reason.
Now when I try to download I get the following message:
"You have exceeded the maximum number of permitted simultaneous patch download requests allowed on this server.
Your request cannot be processed at this time, please retry later with fewer number of patch download request connections."
Would appreciate if anyone could advise on how I can get around this.
Regards,
Santhosh Jose

Thanks Baris.
Now the real problem for me is that the downloads never complete. It goes up until 99.91% etc. and then stops.
I have tried it multiple times using different browsers, different download managers and even different oracle support login ids. The same result everytime.
Has anyone else faced the same issue and found a way around?
Regards,
Santhosh Jose

IWS Web Connector Hangsup on Descent Loads

Hi All,
Env: iWS 6.0, iAS 6.0 SP 4, Solaris
We are facing some problems at descent loads about 50 users using iWS Web Connector. Everything works fine with the load test for first couple of hours and then after that the iWS Web Connector Stops forwarding requests to Application Server.
From the logs of the connector i got following errors
[08/Jan/2002:22:51:23]: Information (20289): conn : invalid packet type (0xd0a) received in GXCONN (conn 0x532278, sock 27, host 0xac130249, port 10818)
[08/Jan/2002:22:51:23]: Information (20289): RunConnection : Close conn=0x532278
[08/Jan/2002:22:51:23]: Information (20289): GXConnMgr : Closing conn 532278
[08/Jan/2002:22:51:23]: Information (20289): GXConnMgr : Delete conn table
[08/Jan/2002:22:51:23]: Information (20289): GXConn::GetNextBuffer() : invalid reply type received in GetNextBuffer (conn 0x532278, sock 0, host 0x0, port 0)
[08/Jan/2002:22:51:23]: Information (20289): GXConn::GetNextBuffer() : invalid reply type received in GetNextBuffer (conn 0x532278, sock 0, host 0x0, port 0)
The process does not crash, but stops forwarding any requests. So i have to restart it.
Any ideas as to what could be wrong?
Thanks,
Yousuf.

Hi Angus,
First of all, in a single application server installation you can't have two
instances like iWS, two have two instances of iAS you have to have two
installation of iAS.
Secondly your webconnector/plugin has the information about only one GXIP
and GXPORT, that is IP address and the KXS port number of the iAS server,
through which it tells the webserver as to which iAS it should forward the
requests containing "NASApp" string in the URL.
So you can't configure two plugins for a single web server instance.
If you want to forward the requests form a webserver to both iAS, than you
have to configure the two iAS in a cluster, and deploy the application on
both.
But you can have multiple webservers pointing to a single iAS.
Please mail me back if you have more questions.
Sanjeev.
Developer Support Team iAS.
Angus Yiu wrote:
I would like to set up an envrionment have the following condition:
one application server have two (ias_a, ias_b) iAS instance;
one web server have two (iws_A, iws_B) web instance;
the web sever is installed web connector on iws_A and point to ias_a.
1: My question is how to make iws_A also point to ias_b, because two ias
instance are doing different job.
2: How to insall a second web connector onto iws_B (also point to ias_a
and ias_b)? because i have already install one web connector for iws_A.
Thanks,
Angus--
When you smile, you know you're alive, It's what defines me.
Sanju...
----------------------------------------------------------------------

OIM Database Connectors version upgrade

Hi,
I need to upgrade the OIM DB User Management Connector from release 9.0.4.1 to 9.0.4.4. and the OIM Database Application Table Connector from release 9.0.4.1 to 9.1.0.1. Any one knows which patches should be applied for these upgrades? I can't find any documentation regarding this.
Thank you.
Regards.

First of all have a look at the read me which comes along with the connector patch and see if the upgrade you are trying to achieve is supported or not. For example:
The *4 Deploying the Patch Set* section in the latest release *9.0.4.5* of the DB User Management Connector clearly says the following:
Note:
Direct upgrade to release 9.0.4.5 from release 9.0.4.3 or earlier releases is not supported.
Same applies to DB App Tables Connector as well. See and confirm it by yourself because I don't have those versions of the connector.
Thanks
Sunny

ODSEE Connector Patch ID request

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for