OEM - Coherence - Weblogic Version compatibility

Hi,
We wanted to deploy to have a deployment of Coherence and Enterprise Manager with our Weblogic Server (10.3.0.0)
We decided to go for Coherence 3.6 since it is a major release. Also, we want to avoid upgrading Weblogic Application Server to 11g since it may involve much more work.
The question is : Does Coherence 3.6 works with OEM(Enterprise Manager) 11G R1 or not ?
My research tells me : OEM 11g Release 1 (11.1.0.1) and 10g release 5 both work with Coherence 3.5.x
Ref : http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11857_01/install.111/e18049/emcgs.htm#BEIEIDHC
Thanks,
Amol Behrani

Hello again!
Our client has the following server setup:
Oracle Weblogic 10.3.4 and Oracle database 10g running on Linux SUSE 10 SP3, all on a VMWare 4.1 virtual machine.
They intend to install LiveCycle Reader Extensions on Windows Server 2008 and use this Weblogic + Oracle database setup on Linux.
Possible?
Thank you!

Similar Messages

OEM - Coherence - Weblogic Versions compatibilty !

Hi,
We wanted to deploy to have a deployment of Coherence and Enterprise Manager with our Weblogic Server (10.3.0.0)
We decided to go for Coherence 3.6 since it is a major release. Also, we want to avoid upgrading Weblogic Application Server to 11g since it may involve much more work.
The question is : Does Coherence 3.6 works with OEM(Enterprise Manager) 11G R1 or not ?
My research tells me : OEM 11g Release 1 (11.1.0.1) and 10g release 5 both work with Coherence 3.5.x
Ref : http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11857_01/install.111/e18049/emcgs.htm#BEIEIDHC
Thanks,
Amol Behrani

Hi All ,
I have a same thread under :
Re: OEM grid 11 installation on windows server 2008
This one is closed.
Request your suggestions/comments on the above mentioned link..
Regards
Kk

OSB Version - Weblogic Version compatibility

Hi All,
We have Weblogic Server on 10.3.2 and would like to install OSB.
I Know 10gR3 is compatible with WLS 10.3.2
I would like to know any latest versions of OSB 11g compatible with WLS 10.3.2.
We have no plans on upgrading our Weblogic server to next versions.
Thanks,
Satya

I guess only 10gR3 is compatible with WLS 10.3.2. For using higher versions of OSB you need to upgrade your WLS as well.For more information you can check the certification matrix for OSB versions higher than 10gR3.
Regards,
Karan
Oracle Fusion Middleware Blog

Downgrade weblogic version from 10.3.1.0 to 10.3.0.0

Hi,
Is there any way I can downgrade he weblogic version from 10.3.1.0 to 10.3.0.0 without haveing impact on my current existing domain which was created using 10.3.1.0?
If so please post me the steps.
thanks
Pooja

Please refer to WebLogic Server 10.3.1 Compatibility with Previous Releases
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12839_01/web.1111/e13754/compat.htm

Version compatibility for installing WLS and ADR for ADF 11.1.2.0

Hi,
Can anyone pls let me know what versions of Weblogic server, Application Development Runtime (ADR) is required to install Oracle JDeveloper 11.1.2.0
B'coz currently I am trying to install Weblogic server, ADR and ADF separately and try to deploy and publish an application in ADF 11.1.2.0 verison.
I am trying this for the past 4 days, but still can't deploy an application successfully in ADF 11.1.2.0 version. Pls let me know the version compatibility.
Thanks,
Aparna

Hi John,
Even I saw the link that u had mentioned. From where can I install these ?
I had downloaded WLS 10.3.5 and ADR 11.1.1.5 separately. But from where do I install the patch ?? I didn't find a proper source to download.
Pls help.
Thanks,
Aparna

Version compatibility of 10G Application Server 10.1.2.0.2 with JDK 1.5.

hi buddies,
I want to know that whether
10G Application Server 10.1.2.0.2 with JDK 1.5. is Version compatibility
pls do send ur replies if known to you.

Hi ,
As far as I know AS 10.1.2.0.2 is Not certified with JDK 1.5.
Please see below some links where you can double-check this
1. OC4J with JDK 1.5 JSP compilation error
2. http://docs.huihoo.com/oracle/docs/B14099_19/web.1012/b14011/chap1.htm
"Only the JDK 1.3.1 and JDK 1.4 compilers are supported and certified by OC4J. It is possible to specify an alternative compiler by adding a <java-compiler> element to the server.xml file, and this might provide a workaround for the "classes not in packages" issue, but no other compilers are certified or supported by Oracle for use with OC4J."
3. "Certified JDKs" from
http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/ias/files/as_certification_r2_101202.html
BR,
Mihai

Want to deploy BI Office.ear file on weblogic version 10

Hi,
I want to deploy BIOffice.ear file on weblogic 10version.
As per oracle weblogic version 9 is supported with OBIEE 10.2.3.4.1 version.
Please let me know if anyone hase done that.
Thanks
Nitasha
Edited by: user13005863 on Jan 11, 2011 4:03PM

Do you have solution for this?

NWDI version compatibility

Hi,
Does anyone know if there are any version compatibility constraints developing Java WebDynpro applications on an NWDI (WAS6.40) for deployment on a WAS7.00 instance (e.g. JDK's)?
I've yet to find a general recommendation similar to that seen for SLD (i.e. keep in line with the highest WAS version on the estate) or any clear documentation on version compatibility across WAS stacks with respect to NWDI.
We have a highly complex landscape with multiple component/ product versions, and we'd prefer to have a singel central NWDI instance, but I'm not sure if this is practical and/ or possible.
Any pointers/ documentation/ comments gratefully received
Cheers
Neil

While I can't remember where I've seen it, SAP does recommend that the DI always be kept patched to the latest levels, regardless of what version your landscape (or pieces thereof ) is at.
So, as long as your DI is at patched to at least the same level as your most 'advanced' system, you should not have any problem. You should also match your Developer Studio to the same level as your target system to avoid using any plug-ins that offer features not offered by the eventual runtime system. Yes, the required libraries will be ok (as long as you configure the SLD and the associated track correctly), but the Developer Studio itself needs to be matched up.
Hope that makes sense.

Photoshop Extended version compatability

I have Photoshop CS3 Extended on both PC (Windows XP) and Mac (OS X Leopard). I'm able to upgrade the PC to CS5 Extended but not the Mac.
My questions are:
1 - Will Photoshop CS5 extended work on Windows XP?
2 - Are CS3 and CS5 backwards compatible - if I work on a document in PC CS5 will the Mac CS5 version be able to open it? I know there will be some things that would not translate backwards, such as Puppet Warp and some of the newer masking and layers features, but I'd still like to be able to work on more basic functions of masking, cloning, etc. on both computers.
Thanks for any help,
Marcy

Noel Car boni wrote:
For the most part, a document saved from Photoshop CS5 will be no problem to open in CS3. There's a "Maximize Compatibility" setting in Edit - Preferences - File Handling section that you'll want to set to "Always".
-Noel
My take is that the compatibility setting should be set based on the kind of work one does. I have it set to "Never". When you check this setting ON you tell Photoshop to save along with all your layers another entity, which is a flattened version of the image. This, makes every PSD file you save larger by a non trival amount.
So this setting should have no effect regarding Photoshop to Photoshop version compatibility. All Photoshop versions understand layers and do not need a flattened version. It's intended to maximize the compatibility between Photoshop and any other program that does not know about layers but reads PSD files. If you have many of your PSD files going to, for example, Lightroom or Premiere then set it to "Always". If not, you can set it to "Ask" or "Never" and save yourself a lot of storage space.
Paulo

Re: (forte-users) C++ version compatibility question. Fortev30L2 on D

Dirk:
I ran into a similar problem. I added an other flag to my fcompile script and
it seems to be working fine, your mileage may vary. The flag was
-cflags "-oldcxx only"
Dwayne Kryger
"Haben, Dirk" <[email protected]> on 08/25/99 02:09:16 AM
To: "'Soapbox Forte Users'" <[email protected]>
cc: (bcc: Dwayne Kryger/SEH)
Subject: (forte-users) C++ version compatibility question. Forte v30L2 on
Digital Unix 4 d and C++ version ???
G'day Folxs
Just installed Forte as a Simple Server on a Digital UNIX (v4.0d) box (being
a VMSbot it was much easier than I thought). We want to use it to interface
with an existing web client. The Forte part is to provide us a scalable
access path to Oracle DBs on the VMS machine; already running Forte.
I'm having trouble finding media that contains C++ v5.4.-006 for the Unix
box. Does anyone know of/has used higher versions of C++ without too much
drama? How about v5.7 or even v6.1? We will be using extensive C++
interfacing to existing web pages!
NB: The current web system client is compiled using EGCS 2.91.66.
TIA,
/[:-)irK
Dirk Haben, Perth WA
For the archives, go to: http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: [email protected]

Dirk:
I ran into a similar problem. I added an other flag to my fcompile script and
it seems to be working fine, your mileage may vary. The flag was
-cflags "-oldcxx only"
Dwayne Kryger
"Haben, Dirk" <[email protected]> on 08/25/99 02:09:16 AM
To: "'Soapbox Forte Users'" <[email protected]>
cc: (bcc: Dwayne Kryger/SEH)
Subject: (forte-users) C++ version compatibility question. Forte v30L2 on
Digital Unix 4 d and C++ version ???
G'day Folxs
Just installed Forte as a Simple Server on a Digital UNIX (v4.0d) box (being
a VMSbot it was much easier than I thought). We want to use it to interface
with an existing web client. The Forte part is to provide us a scalable
access path to Oracle DBs on the VMS machine; already running Forte.
I'm having trouble finding media that contains C++ v5.4.-006 for the Unix
box. Does anyone know of/has used higher versions of C++ without too much
drama? How about v5.7 or even v6.1? We will be using extensive C++
interfacing to existing web pages!
NB: The current web system client is compiled using EGCS 2.91.66.
TIA,
/[:-)irK
Dirk Haben, Perth WA
For the archives, go to: http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: [email protected]

Can I change how Weblogic versions the logfile

Is it possible to change how WebLogic versions the logfil?
I would like to append the date instead of just a number, is that possible.
I would appreciate if you could mail me as well as posting a reply.
Roger Kjernsrod

Roger, this functionality is not supported.
"Roger Kjærnsrød" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
Is it possible to change how WebLogic versions the logfil?
I would like to append the date instead of just a number, is thatpossible.
>
I would appreciate if you could mail me as well as posting a reply.
Roger Kjernsrod

Weblogic.version gives java error after install of D33T

Hi,
I just installed patch D33T (Oracle WebLogic Server Patch Set Update 10.3.6.0.4) - released April 2013. Before installing the patch, I checked my weblogic version (running setWLSEnv and java weblogic.version) following the instructions in the readme and the command worked.
The patch installed fine, I then checked the version again (first doing setWLSEnv and then running java weblogic.version) - however this produced the java error 'NoClassDefFoundError' - could not find the main class: weblogic.version.
I found a blog entry that suggested adding the weblogic.jar to the classpath, so I did that, then exported the classpatch, ran the setWLSEnv.sh again and tried the java weblogic.version command again - but still received the java error. I then tried running the command from the folder containg the weblogic.jar and still no luck.
Anyone have any ideas why this may be producing errors?
Thanks,
Connie
Environment info: RHEL 64 - Weblogic SErver 11gR1 (10.3.6.0) - The servers start and seem to be running fine after the patch install.

I was trying a few more things after I sent my last reply and wondered if my classpath and path values might have not had correct values after running setWLSENV.sh
When I echo'ed their values, they came back without any of the values being set by setWLSEnv.sh
I then set them by copying and pasting the values echo'ed back from the setWLSEnv.sh file - by using export CLASSPATH=$CLASSPATH:<<paste of echo'ed classpath from setWLSEnv.sh>> and then the same for the path. After this, I tried the java weblogic.version and that worked - so now, I guess I am left to deal with issue of my setWLSEnv.sh not setting the CLASSPATH and PATH variables.
Thanks,
Connie

Upgrade weblogic version to 10.x

Hi,
I have application developed using JDK1.4.2 and running in weblogic v7.x. If I were to upgrade to weblogic version 10.x, will I have face problem in terms of JDK compatilibility? Anyone has such experience?

Well, with a few tweaks you should manage to get it running. We had to migrate an ear which was initially developed for OAS 10gR2 (Java 1.4) to WebLogic 10.3. It took as some time
but we managed to do it in the end. Probably from weblogic to weblogic, the migration should be even easier.
I think in the beginning WebLogic 10.3 was accepting the ear compiled by javac 1.4, though later we switched to 1.6 for obvious reasons.

WAP54G Version compatibility

I am trying to create a wireless bridge between a network with ip's 198.1.1.xxx (this network has the gateway) to a network with ip's 198.1.2.xxx - so that it can access the internet thru the gateway). Both AP's are WAP54G set to bridge mode. Both are configured identically except for the IP numbers. SSID broadcast disabled and security off. From everything I have read, I should be able to ping (example 4.2.2.2) from 198.1.2.xxx - but cannot. The only difference I can see it that one of the WAP54G's is version 2 and the other is Version 3. Both have firmware 3.0.4.
Question: Can anyone confirm that I can or cannot create a wireless bridge with differing versions of the same device?
As a plan B, I have on order a WET200. Should I have two on order to act as a matched pair as the WAP54G's had to be?
Thank you.
Craig

I work with psd, indd and illu/eps files. I've heard the weird argument that "cause of new features it's not possible to be version compatible, but that's down right silly. Text on top of an image should be readable in any version. Even with a copule of adjustment layers it should be no problems with version compatibility. That Adobe choose to lock and force is another story. I guess I will be sticking to my CS6 version in the years to come. I paid a lot of money for that Master Collection. I also corresponde files with many CS4 users on the client side.

FORMS 11G & WebLogic Version

Hi,
How I can know which is the compatbile version of forms with weblogic version?
For forms 11.1.1.2.0 ? WebLogic ?
For forms 11.1.1.6.0 ? WebLogic ?
For forms 11.1.2.0.0 ? Weblogic?
Regards,

The version numbers mostly match in Release 1. So notice the last digit. This only applies to FMw 11.1.1.x (Release 1)
<blockquote>Fusion Middleware 11.1.1.2 with* WLS 10.3.2
Fusion Middleware 11.1.1.3 with* WLS 10.3.3
Fusion Middleware 11.1.1.4 with* WLS 10.3.4
Fusion Middleware 11.1.1.5 with* WLS 10.3.5
Fusion Middleware 11.1.1.6 with* WLS 10.3.6</blockquote>

OEM - Coherence - Weblogic Version compatibility

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for